sally dawson, bnl introduction to the standard model tasi, 2006 introduction to the standard model...
TRANSCRIPT
Sally Dawson, BNLIntroduction to the Standard Model
TASI, 2006• Introduction to the Standard Model
– Review of the SU(2) x U(1) Electroweak theory– Experimental status of the EW theory– Constraints from Precision Measurements
• Theoretical problems with the Standard Model• Beyond the SM
– Why are we sure there is physics BSM?– What will the LHC and Tevatron tell us?
Lecture 1
• Introduction to the Standard Model– Just the SU(2) x U(1) part of it….
• Some good references:– Chris Quigg, Gauge Theories of the Strong, Weak,
and Electromagnetic Interactions– Michael Peskin, An Introduction to Quantum Field
Theory– Sally Dawson, Trieste lectures, hep-ph/9901280
Tevatron LHC LHC Upgrade ILC
2006 2007 2012
Science Timeline
Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
• proton-proton collider at CERN (2007)
• 14 TeV energy– 7 mph slower than the
speed of light– cf. 2TeV @ Fermilab ( 307 mph slower than
the speed of light)
• Typical energy of quarks and gluons 1-2 TeV
LHC is Big….
• ATLAS is 100 meters underground, as deep as Big Ben is tall
• The accelerator circumscribes 58 square kilometers, as large as the island of Manhattan
LHC Will Require Detectors of Unprecedented Scale
• CMS is 12,000 tons (2 x’s ATLAS)
• ATLAS has 8 times the volume of CMS
What we know
• The photon and gluon appear to be massless
• The W and Z gauge bosons are heavy
– MW=80.404 0.030 GeV
– MZ =92.1875 0.0021 GeV
• There are 6 quarks
– Mt=172.5 2.3 GeV
– Mt >> all the other quark masses
• There appear to be 3 distinct neutrinos with small but non-zero masses
• The pattern of fermions appears to replicate itself 3 times
– Why not more?
Abelian Higgs Model
• Why are the W and Z boson masses non-zero?
• U(1) gauge theory with single spin-1gauge field, A
• U(1) local gauge invariance:
• Mass term for A would look like:
• Mass term violates local gauge invariance
• We understand why MA = 0
AAF
FFL
4
1
)()()( xxAxA
AAmFFL 2
2
1
4
1
Gauge invariance is guiding principle
Abelian Higgs Model, 2
• Add complex scalar field, , with charge –e:
• Where
• L is invariant under local U(1) transformations:
)(4
1 2
VDFFL
2222)(
V
ieAD
)()(
)()()()( xex
xxAxAxie
AAF
Abelian Higgs Model, 3
• Case 1: 2 > 0
– QED with MA=0 and m=
– Unique minimum at =0
)(4
1 2
VDFFL
2222)(
V
ieAD
By convention, > 0
Abelian Higgs Model, 4
• Case 2: 2 < 0
• Minimum energy state at:
2222)( V
22
2 v
Vacuum breaks U(1) symmetry
Aside: What fixes sign (2)?
Abelian Higgs Model, 5
• Rewrite
• L becomes:
• Theory now has:
– Photon of mass MA=ev
– Scalar field h with mass-squared –22 > 0
– Massless scalar field (Goldstone Boson)
hve vi
2
1
)nsinteractio,(2
1
22
1
24
1 2222
h
hhhAAve
evAFFL
and h are the 2 degrees of freedom of the complex Higgs field
Abelian Higgs Model, 6• What about mixed -A propagator?
– Remove by gauge transformation
• field disappears
– We say that it has been eaten to give the photon mass field called Goldstone boson
– This is Abelian Higgs Mechanism
– This gauge (unitary) contains only physical particles
ev
AA1'
)(2
1
24
1 22
hVhhAAve
FFL
Higgs Mechanism summarized
Spontaneous breaking of a gauge theoryby a non-zero VEV of a scalar field results in the disappearance of a Goldstone boson and its transformation into the longitudinal component of a massive gauge boson
Gauge InvarianceWhat about gauge invariance? Choice above called
unitarity gauge
– No field
– Bad high energy behavior of A propagator
– R gauges more convenient:
– LGF= (1/2)(A+ev)2
222
)(AA M
kkg
Mk
ik
222
222222
22
1
22
111
2
1
ve
hhhAvegAL
More on R gauges
)1(2222
AA Mk
kkg
Mk
i
22hMk
i
22AMk
i
Mass of Goldstone boson depends on =1: Feynman gauge with massive =0: Landau gauge: Unitarity gauge
Higgs, h
Goldstone Boson, , or Faddeev-Popov ghost
Gauge Boson, A
Aside on gauge boson counting
• Massless photon has 2 transverse degrees of freedom– p=(k,0,0,|k|) =(0,1, i,0)/2
• Massive gauge boson has 3 degrees of freedom (2 transverse, 1 longitudinal) L=(|k|,0,0,k0)/MV
• Count: Abelian Higgs Model– We start with: Massless gauge boson (2 dof), complex
scalar (2 dof)– We end with: Massive gauge boson (3 dof), physical
scalar (1 dof)
Non-Abelian Higgs Mechanism
• Vector fields Aa(x) and scalar fields i(x) of SU(N) group
• L is invariant under the non-Abelian symmetry:
a are group generators, a=1…N2-1 for SU(N)
22 )()(
),())((
V
VDDL
jijaa
i i )1(
N
.
.
.1
For SU(2): a=a/2
aa AigD
Non-Abelian Higgs Mechanism, 2
• In exact analogy to the Abelian case
a0 0 Massive vector boson + Goldstone boson a0=0 Massless vector boson + massive scalar field
...)()(...
...)()(...))((
002
2
0
bai
bi
a
bai
bi
a
AAg
AAgDD
Non-Abelian Higgs Mechanism, 3
• Consider SU(2) example
• Suppose gets a VEV:
• Gauge boson mass term
• Using the property of group generators, a,b=ab/2
• Mass term for gauge bosons:
a
a
AigD2
v
0
2
1
baba AA
vvgD
0,0
2
1 22
aamass AA
vgL
8
22
Standard Model Synopsis
• Group: SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1)
• Gauge bosons:– SU(3): G
i, i=1…8– SU(2): W
i, i=1,2,3– U(1): B
• Gauge couplings: gs, g, g• SU(2) Higgs doublet:
ElectroweakQCD
SM Higgs Mechanism
• Standard Model includes complex Higgs SU(2) doublet
• With SU(2) x U(1) invariant scalar potential
• If 2 < 0, then spontaneous symmetry breaking
• Minimum of potential at:
– Choice of minimum breaks gauge symmetry
– Why is 2 < 0?
043
21
2
1
i
i
22 )( V Invariant under -
v
0
2
1
More on SM Higgs Mechanism
• Couple to SU(2) x U(1) gauge bosons (Wi, i=1,2,3; B)
• Gauge boson mass terms from:
BYg
iWg
iD
VDDL
ii
S
22
)()()('
...)()()(8
...
...0
))((,08
1...)(
232222122
BggWWgWgv
vBggWBggWvDD bbaa
Justify later: Y=1
More on SM Higgs Mechanism• With massive gauge bosons:
W = (W
1 W2) /2
Z 0 = (g W3 - g’B )/ (g2+g’2)
• Orthogonal combination to Z is massless photon
A 0 = (g’ W3+gB )/ (g2+g’2)
• Weak mixing angle defined
• Z = - sin WB + cosWW3
• A = cos WB + sinWW3
MW=gv/2MZ=(g2+g’2)v/2
MW=MZ cos W
2222sincos
gg
g
gg
gWW
More on SM Higgs Mechanism
• Generate mass for W,Z using Higgs mechanism– Higgs VEV breaks SU(2) x U(1)U(1)em
– Single Higgs doublet is minimal case
• Just like Abelian Higgs model
– Goldstone Bosons
• Before spontaneous symmetry breaking:
– Massless Wi, B, Complex • After spontaneous symmetry breaking:
– Massive W,Z; massless ; physical Higgs boson h
vi ii
e
2
1' zi ,
Fermi Model
• Current-current interaction of 4 fermions
• Consider just leptonic current
• Only left-handed fermions feel charged current weak interactions (maximal P violation)
• This induces muon decay
JJGL FFERMI 22
hceJ elept
2
1
2
1 55
sG2
e
e
GF=1.16639 x 10-5 GeV-2
This structure known since Fermi
Fermion Multiplet Structure
L couples to W (cf Fermi theory)
– Put in SU(2) doublets with weak isospin I3=1
R doesn’t couple to W
– Put in SU(2) doublets with weak isospin I3=0
• Fix weak hypercharge to get correct coupling to photon
Fermions in U(1) Theory
• Lagrangian is invariant under global U(1) symmetry
• Gauge the symmetry by requiring a local symmetry, (x)
• Local symmetry requires minimal substitution
)( ff miL
eiQ fe
)(xeAiQD f
Coupling Fermions to SU(2) x U(1) Gauge Fields
• In terms of mass eigenstates
• Re-arrange couplings
BY
giWigD aa
22
23IY
Qem
YAgg
ggiYggZ
ggiWW
giD
3
22
232
22 22
1
22
22 gg
gge
ieQAIZg
iWWg
iD WW
23 sin2
cos222
W
eg
sin
Now include Leptons
• Simplest case, include an SU(2) doublet of left-handed leptons
• Only right-handed electron, eR=(1+5)e/2
– No right-handed neutrino
• Define weak hypercharge, Y, such that Qem=(I3+Y)/2
– YeL=-1
– YeR=-2
eeL
L
L
)1(2
1
)1(2
1
5
5
I3=1
To make charge come out right
*Standard Model has massless neutrinos—discovery of non-zero neutrino mass evidence for physics beyond the SM
Leptons, 2• By construction Isospin, I3, commutes with weak
hypercharge [I3,Y]=0
• Couple gauge fields to leptons
• Write in terms of charged and neutral currents
emZleptons JeAJZJWJWgkineticL )(
LiiL
RRleptons
Wg
iYBg
ii
eYBg
iieL
22
2
RWRLWLLLZ
LL
emem
eeeeJ
eJ
eeQJ
22 sin2sin21cos2
12
1
2
1
2
1 55
RL
After spontaneous symmetry breaking….
• Couplings to leptons fixed:
)1()1(cos4
:
)1(4
:
)1(22
:
:
55
5
5
eeW
e
LRg
ieZe
giZ
gieW
ieQieee
Le=I3-2Qemsin2W
Re=-2Qemsin2W
Higgs VEV Conserves Electric Charge
23IY
Qem
v
0
2
1
02
0
00
01
vQem
10
01Y
10
013I
Muon decay
• Consider e e
• Fermi Theory:
e
e
• EW Theory:
eF uuuugGie
2
1
2
122 55
eW
uuuugMk
ige
2
1
2
11
255
22
2
For k<< MW, 22G=g2/2MW2
For k>> MW, 1/E2
e
e
W
Higgs Parameters
• G measured precisely
• Higgs potential has 2 free parameters, 2,
• Trade 2, for v2, Mh2
– Large Mh strong Higgs self-coupling
– A priori, Higgs mass can be anything
22 )( V
42
23
22
2
822h
v
Mh
v
Mh
MV hhh
22
22
2
2
vM
v
h
22
2
2
1
82 vM
gG
W
F 212 )246()2( GeVGv F
Parameters of SU(2) x U(1) Sector
• g, g,,v, Mh Trade for:
=1/137.03599911(46) from (g-2)e and quantum Hall effect
– GF=1.16637(1) x 10-5 GeV-2 from muon lifetime
– MZ=91.18760.0021 GeV
– Plus masses
Decay widths trivial
• Calculate decay widths from:
– Z decays measured precisely at LEP
81
2
1)(
2A
MffV
V
222
2
212)(
212)(
eeZF
ZF
LRMG
eeZ
MGZ
f
f
Z
Now Add Quarks to Standard Model
• Include color triplet quark doublet
– Right handed quarks are SU(2) singlets, uR=(1+5)u, dR=(1+5)d
• With weak hypercharge
– YuR=4/3, YdR=-2/3, YQL=1/3
• Couplings of charged current to W and Z’s take the form:
iL
iLL d
uQ
Qem=(I3+Y)/2
uWddWu
gLWqq )1()1(
2255
qZRLq
gL qq
WZqq )1()1(
cos4 55
Wemq
Wemq
QR
QIL
2
23
sin2
sin2
i=1,2,3 for color
Fermions come in generations
R
L
RR
L
ee
dud
u,, ,
R
L
RR
L
scs
c
,, ,
R
L
RR
L
btb
t
,, ,
Except for masses, the generations look identical
Need Complete Generations
• Complete generations needed for anomaly
cancellation
• Triangle diverges; grows with energy
• Anomaly independent of mass; depends only on gauge properties
3
1
)2( k
kdT
n
n
RLi
cbai
for
tttTrT
,1
,,
Sensible theories can’t have anomalies
Anomalies, 2
• Standard Model Particles:
• V=B, A=Wa (SU(2) gauge bosons)
• Nc=3 is number of colors; Ng is number of generations
• Anomaly cancellation requires complete generation
0113
11
3
21 2
222
3
ggcgcem NNNNNQT
Particle SU(3) SU(2)L U(1)Y
(uR,dR) 3 2 1/3
uR 3 1 -1/3
dR 3 1 1/3
(L,eL) 1 2 -1
eR 1 1 2
Gauge boson self-interactions
• Yang-Mills for gauge fields:
• In terms of physical fields:
• Triple and quartic gauge boson couplings fundamental prediction of model Related to each other
2
2
2
)()(2
1
)(4
1
)(4
1
ZWZWs
cieAWAWieWW
WWWWs
cieZZ
WWWWieAAL
W
W
W
W
YM
BBWWL aa
YM 4
1
4
1 ,
BBB
WWgWWW cbabcaaa
Consider W+W- pair production
Example: W+W-
t-channel amplitude:
In center-of-mass frame:
(p)
(q)
e(k) k=p-p+=p--q
)()()()1()1()(8
)( 525
2 pppu
k
kqv
giWWvvAt
W+(p+)
W-(p-)
cos,sin,0,12
cos,sin,0,12
1,0,0,12
1,0,0,12
WW
WW
sp
sp
sq
sp
sM
ppkt
qps
WW /41
)(
)(
2
22
2
W+W- pair production, 2
Interesting physics is in the longitudinal W sector:
Use Dirac Equation: pu(p)=0
s
MO
M
p W
W
2
)()1()(4
)( 52
2
pukqvM
giWWvvA
WLLt
s
MOsGWWvvA W
FLLt
2222
2sin2)(
Grows with energy
W+W- pair production, 3 SM has additional contribution from s-channel Z exchange
For longitudinal W’s
)()()()()()()1()()(4
)(252
2
ppkpgkpgppg
M
kkgpuqv
Ms
giWWA
ZZs
)()1)()((4
)( 52
2
puppqvM
giWWA
WLLs
)()1()(4
)( 52
2
pukqvM
giWWvvA
WLLs
Contributions which grow with energy cancel between t- and s- channel diagrams
Depends on special form of 3-gauge boson couplings
Z(k)
W+(p+)
W-(p-)
(p)
(q)
Feynman Rules for Gauge Boson Vertices
gppgppgpppppV ZZZ )()()(),,(
),,( ZWWV pppVig
WWWZ
WW
eg
eg
cot
p-
p+
pZ
ggggggigWWVV 2
WWWZZ
WZWW
WW
eg
eg
eg
22
2
2
cot
cot
ggggggig 22
No deviations from SM at LEP2
LEP EWWG, hep-ex/0312023
No evidence for Non-SM 3 gauge boson vertices
Contribution which grows like me
2s cancels between Higgs diagram and others
What about fermion masses?
• Fermion mass term:
• Left-handed fermions are SU(2) doublets
• Scalar couplings to fermions:
• Effective Higgs-fermion coupling
• Mass term for down quark:
RRLLmmL
..chdQL RLdd
L
L d
uQ
..0
),(2
1chd
hvduL RLLdd
v
M dd
2
Forbidden by SU(2)xU(1) gauge invariance
Fermion Masses, 2
• Mu from c=i2* (not allowed in SUSY)
• For 3 generations, , =1,2,3 (flavor indices)
0
*
hcuQL RLu *v
M uu
2
,
..2
)(chdduu
hvL RLdRLuY
Fermion masses, 3• Unitary matrices diagonalize mass matrices
– Yukawa couplings are diagonal in mass basis– Neutral currents remain flavor diagonal– Not necessarily true in models with extended
Higgs sectors
mRdR
mRuR
mLdL
mLuL
dVduVu
dUduUu
• Charged current:m
LdumLLL dVUuduJ
)(
2
1
2
1
CKM matrix
Review of Higgs Couplings
• Higgs couples to fermion mass– Largest coupling is to heaviest fermion
– Top-Higgs coupling plays special role?– No Higgs coupling to neutrinos
• Higgs couples to gauge boson masses
• Only free parameter is Higgs mass!• Everything is calculable….testable theory
hffffv
mfhf
v
mL LRRL
ff
....cos
hZZgM
hWWgMLW
ZW
v=246 GeV
WWW
F eM
Gg
22
222
sin
4
sin8
2
Review of Higgs Boson Feynman Rules
• Higgs couples to heavy particles
• No tree level coupling to photons () or gluons (g)
• Mh2=2v2large Mh is strong
coupling regime– Mh is parameter which
separates perturbative/non-perturbative regimes
Higgs Searches at LEP2• LEP2 searched for e+e-Zh• Rate turns on rapidly after threshold, peaks just above threshold,
3/s• Measure recoil mass of Higgs; result independent of Higgs decay
pattern– Pe-=s/2(1,0,0,1)– Pe+=s/2(1,0,0,-1)– PZ=(EZ, pZ)
• Momentum conservation:– (Pe-+Pe+-PZ)2=Ph
2=Mh2
– s-2 s EZ+MZ2= Mh
2
• LEP2 limit, Mh > 114.1 GeV
Conclusion
• Standard Model consistent theory– Well tested (see lectures 2&3)– Theoretical issues (see lectures 4&5)