sage mt

51
George R. Jiracek San Diego State University

Upload: trixie

Post on 14-Jan-2016

40 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

SAGE MT. George R. Jiracek San Diego State University. "Understanding is More Important Than Knowledge". THE INPUT. THE OUTPUT. MT DATA. LIGHTNING. SOLAR WIND. BLACK BOX EARTH. MT Data Collection. Marlborough, New Zealand. Southern Alps, New Zealand. Southern Alps, New Zealand. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SAGE MT

George R. JiracekSan Diego State University

Page 2: SAGE MT

LIGHTNING

SOLAR WIND

MT DATA

BLACK BOX EARTH

THE INPUT

THE OUTPUT

Page 3: SAGE MT

MT Data Collection

Page 4: SAGE MT

Marlborough, New Zealand

Page 5: SAGE MT

Southern Alps, New Zealand

Page 6: SAGE MT

Southern Alps, New Zealand

Page 7: SAGE MT

Southern Alps, New Zealand

Page 8: SAGE MT

Taupo, New Zealand 2010-12

Page 9: SAGE MT

LOG (-M)DISTANCE (KM)

South Island , New Zealand Geoelectric SectionSouthern Alps Canterbury PlainNW

WSE

DE

PT

H (

KM

)

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

West-landndAFF

The “Banana”

Southern Alps, New Zealand

Page 10: SAGE MT

(Jiracek et al., 2007)

Southern Alps, New Zealand

Page 11: SAGE MT

New Zealand Earthquakes vs. Resistivity in Three-Dimensions

Southern Alps, New Zealand

Page 12: SAGE MT

Three-Dimensional MTTaupo Volcanic Geothermal Field,

New Zealand

(Heise et al. , 2008)

Page 13: SAGE MT

MT Phase Tensor Plot at 0.67s Period from the Taupo Volcanic Field

Page 14: SAGE MT

Magnetotellurics (MT)

Low frequency (VLF to subHertz)

Natural source technique

Energy diffusion governed by ρ(x,y,z)

Techniques - MT(Ack. Paul Bedrosian, USGS)

Page 15: SAGE MT

Magnetotelluric Signals

Techniques - MT(Ack. Paul Bedrosian, USGS)

Page 16: SAGE MT

Always Must SatisfyMaxwell’s Equations

0

f

J t

t

H E

E H

H

E

Quasi-static approx, σ >> εω

Magnetotellurics(Ack. Paul Bedrosian, USGS)

rf is free charge density

Page 17: SAGE MT

Quasistatic Approximation

metersf

ikwhere

eEzE

i

tt

kzx

5002

)1(

),(

),(

),(

0

2

2

ErE

ErE

(Ack. Paul Bedrosian, USGS)

d is skin depth

Page 18: SAGE MT

Graphical Description of Skin Depth, d

Page 19: SAGE MT

Ex(w) = Z(w) Hy(w)

After Fourier transforming the E(t) and H(t) data into the frequency domain the MT surface

impedance is calculated from:

Magnetotelluric Impedance

Page 20: SAGE MT

Note, that since

Ex(w) = Z(w) Hy(w)

is a multiplication in the frequency domain, it is a convolution in the time domain.

Therefore, this is a filtering operation, i.e.,

Hy(t) Ex(t)Z(t)

Page 21: SAGE MT

Apparent resistivity, ra and phase, f

2

0

1a Z

Apparent resistivity is the resistivity of an equivalent, but fictitious, homogeneous,

isotropic half-space

Phase is phase of the impedance

f = tan-1 (Im Z/Re Z)

Page 22: SAGE MT

The goal of MT is the resistivity distribution, (r x,y,z), of the subsurface as calculated from the

surface electromagnetic impedance, Zs

Dimensionality:

• One-Dimensional

• Two-Dimensional

• Three-Dimensional

r1

r2

r3

r4

r5

r6

r7

Page 23: SAGE MT

Geoelectric Dimensionality

1-D 3-D2-D

Page 24: SAGE MT

r a

Period (s)

Log

Log

y

x

z

ra a |Z2|

x

y

EH

=xyZ Shallow Resistive Layer

Intermediate Conductive Layer

Deep Resistive Layer

1-D MT Sounding Curve

Page 25: SAGE MT

Layered (1-D) Earth

Longer period deeper penetration ( )m

Using a range of periods a depth sounding can be obtained

Ex Hy1 1000 m

2 30 m

3 500 m

Apparent resistivity

Impedance Phase

20

40

60

80

0

101

102

103

104

100

30

10-2 102100 104

Period (s)

De

gre

es

Oh

m-m 500

1000

500 T

(Ack., Paul Bedrosian, USGS)

Page 26: SAGE MT

MT “Screening” of Deep Conductive Layer by Shallow Conductive Layer

(Ack., Martyn Unsworth, Univ. Alberta)

Page 27: SAGE MT

When the Earth is either 2-D or 3-D:

Ex(w) = Z(w) Hy(w)

Now

Ex(w) = Zxx(w) Hx(w) + Zxy(w) Hy(w)

Ey(w) = Zyx(w) Hx(w) + Zyy(w) Hy(w)

This defines the tensor impedance, Z(w)

Page 28: SAGE MT

3-D MT Tensor Equation

y

x

yyyx

xyxx

y

x

H

H

ZZ

ZZ

E

E

Page 29: SAGE MT

• 2-D– Assumes geoelectric strike

• 3-D– No geoelectric assumptions

41 )(/)()(

)(/)()(

iD

jiij

eHEZ

HEZ

| |

yyyx

xyxxD ZZ

ZZZ 3

0

02

yx

xyD Z

ZZ

1-D, 2-D, and 3-D Impedance

• 1-D

[ ] is Tensor Impedance

(Ack., Paul Bedrosian, USGS)

Page 30: SAGE MT

3- D MT Data

x xx xy x

y yx yy y

H

E Z Z H

E Z Z H

E Z

Estimate transfer functions of the E and H fields.

Measure time variations of electric (E) and magnetic (H) fields at the Earth‘s surface.

Subsurface resistivity distribution recovered through modeling and inversion.

Techniques - MT

Impedance Tensor: App Resistivity & Phase:

)()(

)(1

)(2

ZArg

Za

(Ack. Paul Bedrosian, USGS)

Page 31: SAGE MT

r a

Period (s)

Log

Log

2-D MT(Tensor Impedance reduces to two off-diagonal elements)

xy

yx

Z

Z

0

0Z

æ öç ÷=ç ÷ç ÷ç ÷è øy

x

z

ra a |Z2|

Geoele

ctric

Strik

e

Page 32: SAGE MT

1. E-Fields parallel to the geoelectric strike are continuous (called TE mode)

2. E-Fields perpendicular to the geoelectric strike are discontinuous (called TM mode)

Boundary Conditions

TM

TE

Map View

Log r

a

Log Period (s)

E-Parallel

E- Perpendicular

Page 33: SAGE MT

TE (Transverse Electric) and TM (Transverse Magnetic) Modes

- 2-D Earth structure

- Different results at MT1 (Ex and Hy) and MT2 (Ey and Hx)

TRANSVERSE ELECTRIC MODE (TE) TRANSVERSE MAGNETIC MODE (TM)

MT1MT2

(Ack., Martyn Unsworth, Univ. Alberta)

Visualizing Maxwell’s Curl Equations

Page 34: SAGE MT

The MT Phase Tensor and its Relation to MT Distortion (Jiracek Draft, June, 2014)

Described as “elegant” by Berdichevsky and Dmitriev (2008) and a “major breakthrough” by Weidelt and Chave (2012)

“Despite its deceiving simplicity, students attending the SAGE program often have problems grasping the essence of the MT

phase tensor” (Jiracek et al., 2014)

MT Phase Tensor

Page 35: SAGE MT

MT Phase Tensor

• X and Y are the real and imaginary parts of impedance tensor Z, i.e., Z = X + iY

• Ideal 2-D, β=0• Recommended β <3° for ~ 2-D

by Caldwell et al., (2004)

YXΦ 1

Page 36: SAGE MT

http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~jiracek/DAGSAW/Rotation_Figure/

tan( )cos( )

( )tan( ) sin( )

yx2D 2D

xy

p c( )

Ellipses are traced out at every period by the multiplication ofthe real 2 x 2 matrix from a MT phase tensor, F(f) and

a rotating, family of unit vectors, c(w), that describe a unit circle.

MT Phase Tensor Ellipse

2-D Tensor Ellipse p2D(w) is:

Page 37: SAGE MT

1-D TP Tc 2-D TP Tc 2-D TP

Phase Tensor Example for Single MT Sounding

at Taupo Volcanic Field, New Zealand

(Bibby et al., 2005)

Page 38: SAGE MT

1-D TP 2-D TP 2-D TP

Tc Tc

Phase Tensor Determinations of Dimensionality (1-D. 2-D), Transition

Periods (TP), and Threshold Periods (Tc)

Page 39: SAGE MT

SAGE MT

Caja Del Rio

Page 40: SAGE MT

Geoelectric Section From Stitched 1-D TE Inversions (MT Sites Indicated by Triangles)

Resistive Basement

Conductive Basin

Distance (m)

E

leva

tion

(m

)

W E

Page 41: SAGE MT

2-D MT Inversion/Finite-Difference Grid

• M model parameters, N surface measurements, M>>N• A regularized solution narrows the model subspace• Introduce constraints on the smoothness of the model

Techniques - MT(Ack. Paul Bedrosian, USGS)

Page 42: SAGE MT

Geoelectric Section From 2-D MT Inversion (MT Sites Indicated by Triangles)

Conductive Basin

Resistive Basement

Distance (m)

E

leva

tion

(m

)W E

Page 43: SAGE MT
Page 44: SAGE MT

(Winther, 2009)

SAGE – Rio Grande Rift, New Mexico

Page 45: SAGE MT

Resistivity Values of Earth Materials

Page 46: SAGE MT

MT Interpretation

Geology

Well Logs

Page 47: SAGE MT

(Winther, 2009)

SAGE – Rio Grande Rift, New Mexico

Page 48: SAGE MT

MT-Derived Midcrustal Conductor Physical StateEastern Great Basin (EGB), Transition Zone (TZ), and Colorado

Plateau (CP) (Wannamaker et al., 2008)

Page 49: SAGE MT

Field Area Now

The Future?

Page 50: SAGE MT

Bibby, H. M., T. G. Caldwell, and C. Brown, 2005, Determinable and non-determinable parameters of galvanic distortion in magnetotellurics, Geophys. J. Int., 163, 915 -930.

Caldwell, T. G., H. M. Bibby, and C. Brown, 2004, The magnetotelluric phase tensor, Geophys. J. Int., 158, 457- 469.

Heise, W., T. G. Caldwell, H. W. Bibby, and C. Brown, 2006, Anisotropy and phase splits in magnetotellurics, Phys. Earth. Planet. Inter., 158, 107-121.

Jiracek, G.R., V. Haak, and K.H. Olsen, 1995, Practical magnetotellurics in continental rift environments, in Continental rifts: evolution, structure, and tectonics, K.H. Olsen, ed., 103-129.

Jiracek, G. R., V. M Gonzalez, T. G. Caldwell, P. E. Wannamaker, and D. Kilb, 2007, Seismogenic, Electrically Conductive, and Fluid Zones at Continental Plate Boundaries in New Zealand, Himalaya, and California-USA, in Tectonics of A Continental Transform Plate Boundary: The South Island, New Zealand, Amer. Geophys. Un. Mono. Ser. 175, 347-369.

References

Page 51: SAGE MT

Palacky, G.J., 1988, Resistivity characteristics of geologic targets, in Investigations in Geophysics Volume 3: Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics theory vol. 1, M.N. Nabighian ed., Soc. Expl. Geophys., 53–129.

Winther, P. K., 2009, Magnetotelluric investigations of the Santo Domingo Basin, Rio Grande rift, New Mexico, M. S thesis, San Diego State University, 134 p.

Wannamaker, P. E., D. P. Hasterok, J. M. Johnston, J. A. Stodt, D. B. Hall, T. L. Sodergren, L. Pellerin, V. Maris, W. M. Doerner, and M. J. Unsworth, 2008, Lithospheric Dismemberment and Magmatic Processes of the Great Basin-Colorado Plateau Transition, Utah, Implied from Magnetotellurics: Geochem., Geophys., Geosys., 9, 38 p.