safety manager to business partner – a paradigm shift › download › safety-symposium... ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Safety Manager to Business Partner –
A Paradigm Shift1111thth Sept 2015 Sept 2015
NIRUPAM MUKHERJEEGlobal Safety Director – Engineering and ConstructionGlobal Safety Director – Engineering and Construction
PRAXAIR INC.
26F. KERRY PARKSIDE
1155 FANGDIAN ROAD
PUDONG. SHANGHAI-201204
Electrical Engineer and PG in Safety Engineering with 19 years of
diversified Safety Management experience in large scale green field,
industrial, transportation, infrastructure construction project. Gas
and air separation plants, process safety. Heavy engineering work
shops etc. Founder Member and Membership Chair ASSE India
Chapter. International Practice Specialty Liaison for India.
ObjectivesObjectives
Challanging the OBVIOUS
The primary objective of this research is to verify and revisit a few popular beliefs
• Safety Managers are responsible to ENFORCE Safety rules
• Following STRICT Safety rules ONLY can help prevent accidents
• Safety personnel slows down work, adds cost and make tasks difficult
• Safety is the only business they understand
Does these age-old paradigms still hold good?
What does the world expect from us (Safety Managers)?
Background Background –– Evolution of modern safety Evolution of modern safety phylosophyphylosophy
Most popular theories
Safety professionals have used some of the most successful and time tested
theories like
• The ‘Ice-Berg’ theory – Direct and Indirect cost of an accident
• Popular Safety catchy – ‘Safety First - Safety Must’
What we learnt and taught – Why follow Safety Rules?
Challenge Challenge –– Common BeliefCommon Belief
BUT, what did not change ?
A strong belief that - Following Safety rules will
• Make work slow
• Require more people
• Need detailed set-up. Hence, more materials, more cost
• Thus, a direct hit to the bottom-line
Result Result –– Diminishing Effect Diminishing Effect
• Growing apathy
• Increasing violation, At risk behavior
• Stressed relation between employees, client - contractor
• Complain – Safety affecting progress
Management Action
- More Enforcement
- Safety Monitoring
- Safety policing
Evolution of ‘Evolution of ‘Mr.SafetyMr.Safety CoPCoP’’
Changed role of a ‘Safety Engineer’
• Workers are SCARED – There Comes the ‘Safety Police’
• Accountable to - STOP unsafe conditions or behaviors
• Always in the field – WATCHING !!
• Recognition α Degree of ‘FEAR’ you generate• Recognition α Degree of ‘FEAR’ you generate
Result : ISOLATION at work
Mr.SafetyMr.Safety Cop Cop -- Desperate for a ChangeDesperate for a Change
Conditioned to play the role of a SAFETY COP needed to break free from the pre-
established image.
New Competencies needed –New Competencies needed –
• Positive attitude – Ready to help approach
• Effective Communication
• Most Importantly – Skill to work out easy solutions
• Awareness outside the world of Safety – How Business works?
First Step First Step ––> Business Partner> Business Partner
STEP CHANGE STEP CHANGE –– Not an easy task !Not an easy task !
• Mind set, habits were difficult to change
• Acceptance of Mr. Safety Cop in a different role was still difficult to accept
• No Trial and Error will be entertained
• A concrete proposal with measurable results was necessary• A concrete proposal with measurable results was necessary
• Knowledge / awareness about the overall business – Very Important
Example 1 Example 1 –– Game ChangerGame Changer
Management of Power cords in a Civil construction site
A CASE STUDY
Case 1Case 1
Management of Power cords in a Civil work site
Please see notes section for the description
Case 1Case 1
Proposed solution
Case 1 Case 1
Advantages:
• Safer – No sagging. More permanent set up. No energized work. No
incidents
• Reduction of approximately 150 meters of power cables : Cost reduction
• Easy cord management: No further handling, changing, replacement of
cordscords
• Reduced manual effort
• Reduction in time wastage
More ExamplesMore Examples
CASE STUDY II – Scaffolding work
CASE STUDY III – Materials HandlingCASE STUDY III – Materials Handling
CASE STUDY IV – Girder fabrication
Case II Case II –– Cooling Tower painting Cooling Tower painting
Case II Case II –– Cooling Tower painting Cooling Tower painting
Work requirement - Problem
• The structures of the cooling tower were to be painted with anti-corrosive paint.
• Erect scaffold all around the equipment and manually and apply the paint.
• Require 20 scaffolders for 30 days to erect and dismantle the scaffold
• Additional field supervisors
• Significant amount of scaffolding materials
• Significant risk due to elevated scaffold work / fall hazard
• To meet demand, hire local workers
• Not enough time for detailed safety orientation, screening and onboarding
Case II Case II –– Cooling Tower painting Cooling Tower painting
New approach - Solution
• Use two boom-lifts, each with two painters to apply the paint instead of erecting
scaffold for the task
Simple Change – Great benefits
• Savings of nearly 4000 man-hours
• Reduction of 3 supervisors• Reduction of 3 supervisors
• Substantial reduction of risk – 20 workers performing elevated work, scaffold
erection, dismantling
• No hiring of scaffold materials
• Most importantly - Reduction of more than 30 days schedule
Case III Case III –– Materials HandlingMaterials Handling
Challenges
Problem
• Manual transportation of materials from job site to warehouse (500 m away)
• Routine task by multiple workers – to and from the warehouse
• Risk of fall, strenuous task, wastage of man-power, time – low productivity
Challenges
• Hiring mechanized equipment / truck is expensive
• Materials are required in small quantity to maintain an
uncluttered site and good housekeeping.
• Extra materials are required to be returned to the
warehouse after each day’s work.
Case III Case III –– Materials HandlingMaterials Handling
Solution
• Arrange manual material carts with large wheels.
• Deploy two workers per trolley to shift materials
Case III Case III –– Materials HandlingMaterials Handling
Benefits
• A cart can carry approx. 15 times than a single person. Say, 5 cart trips = 75
individual trips --To & fro travelling time + waiting time - approx. 30 mins.
• Say 1 cart does 5 trips – Approximately 35 man-hours saved / day
• Nearly 650 man hours saving / month (35 x 26)
• Last but not the least, the safety concern could be eliminated
Happy contractor, happy workers – Safe work
Case IV Case IV –– FabricationFabrication
Work procedure challanges
• Fabrication of ‘I’ section steel girders - 18 meters (span) x 2.5 meters (tall)
• Hundreds of 100 mm (4 inches) steel anchor bolts to be welded on the top flange
• Positioning on a 300 mm (12 inches) wide flange at 2.5 meters height and
continuously performs welding was a real challenge & risky
• Fall arrestor / harness / lifeline was of no help
Proposed work procedure
• Build scaffold on both side of the flange at the
same level
• Procedure was Safe, but was slow, expensive �
Less productive
Case IV Case IV –– FabricationFabrication
Final solution
• ‘Problem’ is due to elevated work – can it be removed altogether?
• Position the ‘I’ girder slant instead of vertical as shown in the sketch
• A foreman added an ides to use a template to position the bolts easily
• This new solution and team work paid off
Case IV Case IV –– FabricationFabrication
Advantages
- Much safer than the earlier work methods
- Approximately 2000 man hours saving due to elimination of scaffolding
construction and removal every month.
- Complete elimination of elevated work – Hence the entire risk of fall
- ‘I’ girder delivery schedule was more than 20 % quicker
- Great quality – No misalignment, better weld quality, less repair
- Welder’s work position improvement – Less fatigue, health hazards
Final VerdictFinal Verdict
A positive Change
• A new and fresh image for Mr. SAFETY-COP
• New leadership position within the team
• Perspective of SAFETY MANGEMENT underwent a BIG change
• Job-Satisfaction – Respect – Recognition
A complete over-haul of the age-old safety culture took place. Safety viewed as an
‘ESSENTIAL’ element than ‘ADD-ON’
SAFETY SAVES for the first time was interpreted correctly !!
Safety IS DIRECTLY αααα to Profitability and Productivity
The Next Gen Safety EngineersThe Next Gen Safety Engineers
The ‘next-gen’ safety professionals will not only be recognized by the new
technologies and modern equipment they will adapt, but also the creativity
and innovation with which they will offer practical solutions.
World is waiting for them –
The ‘Generation Next’ safety leaders!
THANK YOUTHANK YOU