informedforlife.org safety assessment...2015 bmw 335i xdrive gt 5 hb awd car not recommended: [nhtsa...

Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r

2015 ACURA ILX 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [11% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2950 1.11

2015 ACURA MDX AWD SUV SAFEST 1% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4264 0.41

2015 ACURA MDX FWD SUV SAFEST 1% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4264 0.41

2015 ACURA RDX AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3821 0.50

2015 ACURA RDX FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3821 0.50

2015 ACURA RLX 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3919 0.75

2015 ACURA TLX 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3598 0.85

2015 ACURA TLX 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3598 0.85

2015 ALFA 4C 2 DR 2WD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 AUDI A3 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3368 0.94

2015 AUDI A3 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3368 0.94

2015 AUDI A3 CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 AUDI A3 CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 AUDI A4 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3676 0.83

2015 AUDI A4 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3676 0.83

2015 AUDI A5 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2015 AUDI A6 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 5 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3951 0.74

2015 AUDI A6 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 5 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3951 0.74



2015 AUDI A8L 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 AUDI ALLROAD STA. WGN. AWD

SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3676 0.53

2015 AUDI Q3 AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 AUDI Q5 AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4189 0.43

2015 AUDI Q5 HEV AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4189 0.43

2015 AUDI Q7 AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 AUDI R8 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 AUDI R8 SPYDER CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 AUDI RS5 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 AUDI RS5 CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2015 AUDI S3 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3368 0.94

2015 AUDI S4 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3676 0.83

2015 AUDI S5 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

InformedForLife.orgSafety Assessment

(listed alphabetically within model year)

www.InformedForLife.org All data subject to errors and omissions page 1

Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2015 AUDI S5 CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a




2015 AUDI SQ5 AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 4189 0.43

2015 AUDI TT 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 AUDI TT CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 AUDI TTS 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 AUDI TTS ROADSTER CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 BMW 228I 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3311 0.96

2015 BMW 228I 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3311 0.96

2015 BMW 320I 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3399 0.92

2015 BMW 320I XDRIVE 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3399 0.92

2015 BMW 328D 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3399 0.92

2015 BMW 328D XDRIVE 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3399 0.92

2015 BMW 328D XDRIVE STA. WGN. AWD

CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2015 BMW 328I XDRIVE STA. WGN. AWD

SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3399 0.59

2015 BMW 328I XDRIVE GT 5 HB RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3399 0.92



2015 BMW 335I XDRIVE GT 5 HB AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3399 0.92

2015 BMW 428I 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2015 BMW 428I CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 BMW 428I XDRIVE 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2015 BMW 428I XDRIVE CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2015 BMW 435I 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a






Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r





2015 BMW 535D 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3803 0.79

2015 BMW 535D XDRIVE 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3803 0.79


2015 BMW 535I GT 5 HB RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3945 0.74


2015 BMW 535I XDRIVE GT 5 HB AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3945 0.74


2015 BMW 550I GT 5 HB RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3945 0.74













2015 BMW 650XI 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 BMW 650XI CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2015 BMW 740LD XDRIVE 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 BMW 740LI 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 BMW 740LI XDRIVE 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a






2015 BMW ACTIVE HYBRID 3 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3399 0.92



Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2015 BMW ACTIVE HYBRID 7 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 BMW ALPINA B6 XDRIVE 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 BMW I3 5 HB RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 BMW I8 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 BMW M235I 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 BMW M3 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2015 BMW M4 CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a





2015 BMW X1 SDRIVE28I RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3660 0.54

2015 BMW X1 XDRIVE28I AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3660 0.54


2015 BMW X3 SDRIVE28I RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4050 0.46

2015 BMW X3 XDRIVE28D AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4050 0.46

2015 BMW X3 XDRIVE28I AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4050 0.46

2015 BMW X3 XDRIVE35I AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4050 0.46

2015 BMW X4 XDRIVE28I AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 BMW X4 XDRIVE35I AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 BMW X5 SDRIVE35I RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? 4679 0.32

2015 BMW X5 XDRIVE35D AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? 4679 0.32

2015 BMW X5 XDRIVE35I AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? 4679 0.32

2015 BMW X5 XDRIVE50I AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? 4679 0.32

2015 BMW Z4 SDRIVE28I CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2015 BMW Z4 SDRIVE35IS CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 BUICK ENCLAVE AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2015 BUICK ENCLAVE FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2015 BUICK ENCORE AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3346 0.60

2015 BUICK ENCORE FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3346 0.60

2015 BUICK LACROSSE 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4255 0.66

2015 BUICK LACROSSE 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4255 0.66

2015 BUICK LACROSSE EASSIST 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4255 0.66


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2015 BUICK LACROSSE EASSIST 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4255 0.66

2015 BUICK REGAL 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3676 0.83

2015 BUICK REGAL 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3676 0.83

2015 BUICK REGAL EASSIST 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3676 0.83

2015 BUICK VERANO 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3419 0.92

2015 CADILLAC ATS 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3683 0.82

2015 CADILLAC ATS 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3683 0.82

2015 CADILLAC CTS 4DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 5 ? GOOD note (C) ? ? ? 3786 0.79

2015 CADILLAC CTS 4DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 5 ? GOOD note (C) ? ? ? 3786 0.79

2015 CADILLAC CTS-V 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD note (C) ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 CADILLAC ELR 2 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 CADILLAC ESCALADE AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5672 0.12

2015 CADILLAC ESCALADE RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5672 0.12

2015 CADILLAC ESCALADE ESV AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5837 0.08

2015 CADILLAC ESCALADE ESV RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5837 0.08

2015 CADILLAC SRX AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4550 0.35

2015 CADILLAC SRX FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4550 0.35

2015 CADILLAC XTS 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4268 0.65

2015 CADILLAC XTS 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4268 0.65

2015 CHEVROLET CAMARO 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3791 0.79

2015 CHEVROLET CAMARO CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3791 0.79

2015 CHEVROLET CAPRICE PPV 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 CHEVROLET CAPTIVA AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 3 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3762 0.52

2015 CHEVROLET CAPTIVA FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 3 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3762 0.52

2015 CHEVROLET CITY EXPRESS FWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 CHEVROLET COLORADO PU/CC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 CHEVROLET COLORADO PU/CC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 CHEVROLET COLORADO PU/EC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 CHEVROLET COLORADO PU/EC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 CHEVROLET CORVETTE 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 CHEVROLET CORVETTE CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 CHEVROLET CRUZE 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [5% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3073 1.05

2015 CHEVROLET EQUINOX AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3936 0.48

2015 CHEVROLET EQUINOX FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3936 0.48

2015 CHEVROLET EXPRESS CARGO G23405 RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r






2015 CHEVROLET EXPRESS PASSENGER 2500 RWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 CHEVROLET EXPRESS PASSENGER 3500 12 PASS RWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2015 CHEVROLET IMPALA 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? 3606 0.85

2015 CHEVROLET IMPALA EASSIST 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? 3606 0.85

2015 CHEVROLET IMPALA LIMITED 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 4 4 ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? 3588 0.86

2015 CHEVROLET MALIBU 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3593 0.85

2015 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 PU/CC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? 5540 0.31

2015 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 PU/CC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? 5540 0.31

2015 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 PU/EC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? 5262 0.35

2015 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 PU/EC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? 5262 0.35

2015 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 PU/RC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 PU/RC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6721 0.20

2015 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6721 0.20

2015 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 2 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6721 0.20

2015 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/EC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 2 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6721 0.20

2015 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/RC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 2 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6615 0.20

2015 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 3500 PU/CC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 3500 PU/CC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 3500 PU/EC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 3500 PU/EC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 3500 PU/RC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 3500 PU/RC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 CHEVROLET SONIC 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [16% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 2820 1.16

2015 CHEVROLET SONIC 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [16% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 2820 1.16

2015 CHEVROLET SPARK 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [44% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2281 1.44

2015 CHEVROLET SPARK EV 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [44% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2296 1.44

2015 CHEVROLET SS 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 CHEVROLET SUBURBAN 1500 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5837 0.08

2015 CHEVROLET SUBURBAN 1500 RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5837 0.08

2015 CHEVROLET TAHOE 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5672 0.12


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2015 CHEVROLET TAHOE RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5672 0.12

2015 CHEVROLET TRAVERSE AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2015 CHEVROLET TRAVERSE FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2015 CHEVROLET TRAX AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3346 0.60

2015 CHEVROLET TRAX FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3346 0.60

2015 CHEVROLET VOLT 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3753 0.80

2015 CHRYSLER 200 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3447 0.91

2015 CHRYSLER 200 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3447 0.91

2015 CHRYSLER 300 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4299 0.64

2015 CHRYSLER 300 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4299 0.64

2015 CHRYSLER TOWN AND COUNTRY FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4605 0.57

2015 DODGE CHALLENGER 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3892 0.76

2015 DODGE CHARGER 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4242 0.66

2015 DODGE CHARGER 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4242 0.66

2015 DODGE CHARGER PURSUIT 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 DODGE CHARGER PURSUIT 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 DODGE DART 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3300 0.96

2015 DODGE DURANGO 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4946 0.27

2015 DODGE DURANGO 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4946 0.27

2015 DODGE GRAND CARAVAN FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4605 0.57

2015 DODGE JOURNEY AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? 4 ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4200 0.42

2015 DODGE JOURNEY FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? 4 ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4200 0.42

2015 FIAT 500 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [36% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 2438 1.36

2015 FIAT 500 ABARTH 3 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 FIAT 500 ABARTH CABRIO 3 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 FIAT 500C 3 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 FIAT 500E 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [34% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 2469 1.34

2015 FIAT 500L 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3317 0.95

2015 FORD CMAX ENERGI 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3925 0.75

2015 FORD CMAX HEV 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3637 0.84

2015 FORD EDGE AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 FORD EDGE FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 FORD ESCAPE AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3610 0.55

2015 FORD ESCAPE FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3610 0.55

2015 FORD EXPEDITION 4x2 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6125 0.02


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2015 FORD EXPEDITION 4x4 SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6125 0.02

2015 FORD EXPEDITION EL EXTENDED SUV 4x2

SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6125 0.02

2015 FORD EXPEDITION EL EXTENDED SUV 4x4


2015 FORD EXPLORER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 4633 0.33

2015 FORD EXPLORER FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 4633 0.33

2015 FORD F-150 REGULAR CAB PU/RC 4x2 PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2015 FORD F-150 SUPER CREW PU/CC 4x2 PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2015 FORD F-150 SUPERCAB PU/EC 4x2 PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2015 FORD F-250 REGULAR CAB PU/RC 4x2 PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 FORD F-250 REGULAR CAB PU/RC 4x4 PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 FORD F-250 SUPER CREW PU/CC 4x2 PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6994 0.18

2015 FORD F-250 SUPER CREW PU/CC 4x4 PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6994 0.18

2015 FORD F-250 SUPERCAB PU/EC 4x2 PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 FORD F-250 SUPERCAB PU/EC 4x4 PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a







2015 FORD FIESTA 4 DR FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [26% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

4 4 2 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 2618 1.26

2015 FORD FIESTA 5 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [26% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]


2015 FORD FLEX AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4639 0.33

2015 FORD FLEX FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4639 0.33

2015 FORD FOCUS 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [9% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2985 1.09

2015 FORD FOCUS 5 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 FORD FOCUS BEV 5 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 FORD FUSION 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 5 5 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3709 0.82

2015 FORD FUSION 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 5 5 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3709 0.82

2015 FORD FUSION ENERGI 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 4006 0.72

2015 FORD FUSION HEV 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 5 5 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3709 0.82

2015 FORD MUSTANG 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2015 FORD MUSTANG CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 FORD TAURUS 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4145 0.69

2015 FORD TAURUS 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4145 0.69

2015 FORD TRANSIT RWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? 4 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 5628 0.38

2015 FORD TRANSIT WAGON RWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? 4 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 5628 0.38

2015 FORD TRANSIT CONNECT FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? 4 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 4440 0.61

2015 FORD TRANSIT CONNECT WAGON FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3949 0.74

2015 FORD TRANSIT LOW ROOF WAGON RWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5628 0.38

2015 FREIGHTLINER SPRINTER 2500 4WD TRUCK VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 FREIGHTLINER SPRINTER 2500 RWD TRUCK VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 FREIGHTLINER SPRINTER 2500 MIXTO 4WD TRUCK VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 FREIGHTLINER SPRINTER 2500 MIXTO RWD TRUCK VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 FREIGHTLINER SPRINTER 2500 CARGO VAN CARGO VAN

4WDTRUCK VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


RWDTRUCK VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 FREIGHTLINER SPRINTER 3500 CAB CHASSIS CAB CHASSIS








2015 GMC ACADIA AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2015 GMC ACADIA FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2015 GMC ACADIA DENALI AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 4888 0.28

2015 GMC ACADIA DENALI FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 4888 0.28

2015 GMC CANYON PU/CC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 GMC CANYON PU/CC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 GMC CANYON PU/EC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 GMC CANYON PU/EC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 GMC SAVANA CARGO G23405 RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a




2015 GMC SAVANA PASSENGER 2500 RWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 GMC SAVANA PASSENGER 3500 12 PASS RWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2015 GMC SIERRA 1500 PU/CC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? 5540 0.31

2015 GMC SIERRA 1500 PU/CC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? 5540 0.31


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2015 GMC SIERRA 1500 PU/EC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? 5262 0.35

2015 GMC SIERRA 1500 PU/EC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? 5262 0.35

2015 GMC SIERRA 1500 PU/RC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 GMC SIERRA 1500 PU/RC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6721 0.20

2015 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6721 0.20

2015 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 2 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6721 0.20

2015 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/EC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 2 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6721 0.20

2015 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/RC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 2 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6615 0.20

2015 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/RC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 2 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6615 0.20

2015 GMC SIERRA 3500 PU/CC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 GMC SIERRA 3500 PU/CC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 GMC SIERRA 3500 PU/EC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 GMC SIERRA 3500 PU/EC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 GMC SIERRA 3500 PU/RC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 GMC SIERRA 3500 PU/RC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 GMC TERRAIN AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3936 0.48

2015 GMC TERRAIN FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3936 0.48

2015 GMC YUKON 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5672 0.12

2015 GMC YUKON RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5672 0.12

2015 GMC YUKON DENALI 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5672 0.12

2015 GMC YUKON DENALI RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5672 0.12

2015 GMC YUKON DENALI XL 1500 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5837 0.08

2015 GMC YUKON DENALI XL 1500 RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5837 0.08

2015 GMC YUKON XL 1500 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5837 0.08

2015 GMC YUKON XL 1500 RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5837 0.08

2015 HONDA ACCORD 2 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3311 0.96

2015 HONDA ACCORD 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3386 0.93

2015 HONDA ACCORD HYBRID 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3386 0.93

2015 HONDA ACCORD PLUG IN HYBRID 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3235 0.99

2015 HONDA CIVIC 2 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [19% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 2772 1.19


2015 HONDA CIVIC CNG 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [23% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 2678 1.23

2015 HONDA CIVIC HYBRID 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [14% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 2869 1.14

2015 HONDA CROSSTOUR AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4096 0.45


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2015 HONDA CROSSTOUR FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4096 0.45

2015 HONDA CR-V AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3491 0.57

2015 HONDA CR-V FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3491 0.57

2015 HONDA CR-Z 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [23% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 3 5 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2688 1.23

2015 HONDA FIT 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [31% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2534 1.31

2015 HONDA ODYSSEY FWD VAN SAFEST 2% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4400 0.62

2015 HONDA PILOT AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4495 0.36

2015 HONDA PILOT FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4495 0.36

2015 HYUNDAI ACCENT 4 DR FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [31% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

4 4 4 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD GOOD POOR 2532 1.31

2015 HYUNDAI ACCENT 5 5 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [31% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]


2015 HYUNDAI AZERA 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3626 0.84

2015 HYUNDAI ELANTRA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [17% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2798 1.17

2015 HYUNDAI ELANTRA GT 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [17% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2798 1.17

2015 HYUNDAI EQUUS 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4528 0.59

2015 HYUNDAI GENESIS 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD GOOD 4323 0.64

2015 HYUNDAI GENESIS 4 DR AWD CAR SAFEST 2% 5 5 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4376 0.62

2015 HYUNDAI GENESIS 4 DR RWD CAR SAFEST 2% 5 5 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4376 0.62

2015 HYUNDAI SANTA FE AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3877 0.49

2015 HYUNDAI SANTA FE FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3877 0.49

2015 HYUNDAI SANTA FE SPORT AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3733 0.52

2015 HYUNDAI SANTA FE SPORT FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3733 0.52

2015 HYUNDAI SONATA 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3315 0.96

2015 HYUNDAI SONATA HYBRID 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3225 0.99

2015 HYUNDAI TUCSON AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3414 0.59

2015 HYUNDAI TUCSON FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3414 0.59

2015 HYUNDAI TUCSON FUEL CELL FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3359 0.60

2015 HYUNDAI VELOSTER 3C FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [21% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

5 4 5 4 NO GOOD note (C) ? GOOD MARGINAL 2724 1.21

2015 INFINITI Q40 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 INFINITI Q40 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 INFINITI Q50 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3652 0.83

2015 INFINITI Q50 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3652 0.83

2015 INFINITI Q50 HYBRID 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3652 0.83

2015 INFINITI Q50 HYBRID 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3652 0.83

2015 INFINITI Q60 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 INFINITI Q60 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2015 INFINITI Q60 CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 INFINITI Q70 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3821 0.78

2015 INFINITI Q70 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3821 0.78

2015 INFINITI Q70 HEV 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3821 0.78

2015 INFINITI Q70L 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 INFINITI Q70L 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 INFINITI QX50 PC AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3970 0.47

2015 INFINITI QX50 STA. WGN. AWD

SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3970 0.47

2015 INFINITI QX50 STA. WGN. RWD


2015 INFINITI QX60 AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4431 0.38

2015 INFINITI QX60 FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4431 0.38

2015 INFINITI QX60 HYBRID AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4431 0.38

2015 INFINITI QX60 HYBRID FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4431 0.38

2015 INFINITI QX70 AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD ? GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 INFINITI QX70 RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD ? GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 INFINITI QX80 AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 INFINITI QX80 RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 JAGUAR F-TYPE 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 JAGUAR F-TYPE CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 JAGUAR XF 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 JAGUAR XF 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 JAGUAR XJ (LWB) 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 JAGUAR XJ (LWB) 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 JAGUAR XJ (SWB) 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 JAGUAR XJ (SWB) 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 JAGUAR XK 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 JAGUAR XK CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 JEEP CHEROKEE 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3960 0.47


2015 JEEP COMPASS 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? 3 ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3322 0.61

2015 JEEP COMPASS 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? 3 ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3322 0.61

2015 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 5 5 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 4679 0.32

2015 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 4679 0.32

2015 JEEP PATRIOT 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? 3 ? 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3344 0.60

2015 JEEP PATRIOT 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? 3 ? 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3344 0.60


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2015 JEEP WRANGLER 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD POOR MARGINAL ? MARGINAL n/a weight n/a

2015 JEEP WRANGLER UNLIMITED 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 KIA CADENZA 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3626 0.84

2015 KIA FORTE 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [15% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 2845 1.15

2015 KIA FORTE 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [17% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 2807 1.17

2015 KIA FORTE KOUP 2 DR FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [17% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

? ? ? ? NO GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 2812 1.17

2015 KIA K900 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 KIA OPTIMA 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3247 0.98

2015 KIA OPTIMA HYBRID 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 4% 5 5 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3247 0.98

2015 KIA RIO 4 DR FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [29% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

4 4 5 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 2559 1.29

2015 KIA RIO 5 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [29% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]


2015 KIA SEDONA FWD VAN VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4583 0.58

2015 KIA SORENTO AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3788 0.51

2015 KIA SORENTO FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3788 0.51

2015 KIA SOUL FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [15% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 2853 1.15

2015 KIA SOUL EV FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [13% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 2905 1.13

2015 KIA SPORTAGE AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3370 0.60

2015 KIA SPORTAGE FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 4 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3370 0.60

2015 LANDROVER DISCOVERY SPORT (5 SEAT) 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 LANDROVER DISCOVERY SPORT (7 SEAT) 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 LANDROVER LR2 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 LANDROVER LR4 (7 SEAT) 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 LANDROVER RANGE ROVER (LWB) 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 LANDROVER RANGE ROVER (SWB) 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 LANDROVER RANGE ROVER EVOQUE (3-DOOR) 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 LANDROVER RANGE ROVER EVOQUE (5-DOOR) 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 LANDROVER RANGE ROVER SPORT (5 SEAT) 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 LANDROVER RANGE ROVER SPORT (7 SEAT) 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 LEXUS CT200H 5 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3229 0.99

2015 LEXUS ES300H 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3575 0.86

2015 LEXUS ES350 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3575 0.86

2015 LEXUS GS350 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3743 0.80

2015 LEXUS GS350 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3743 0.80

2015 LEXUS GS450H 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3743 0.80

2015 LEXUS GX460 AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2015 LEXUS IS250 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 5 ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? 3773 0.80

2015 LEXUS IS250 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 5 ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? 3773 0.80

2015 LEXUS IS250C CONV. RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD note (C) ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 LEXUS IS350 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3773 0.80

2015 LEXUS IS350 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3773 0.80

2015 LEXUS IS350C CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 LEXUS LS460 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 LEXUS LS460 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 LEXUS LS460L 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 LEXUS LS460L 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 LEXUS LS600HL 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 LEXUS LX570 AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 LEXUS NX200T AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3972 0.47

2015 LEXUS NX200T FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3972 0.47

2015 LEXUS NX300H AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3972 0.47

2015 LEXUS NX300H FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3972 0.47

2015 LEXUS RX350 AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4816 0.29

2015 LEXUS RX350 FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4816 0.29

2015 LEXUS RX450H AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4816 0.29

2015 LEXUS RX450H FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4816 0.29

2015 LINCOLN MKC AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 4013 0.46

2015 LINCOLN MKC FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 4013 0.46

2015 LINCOLN MKS 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4145 0.69

2015 LINCOLN MKS 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4145 0.69

2015 LINCOLN MKT AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4899 0.28

2015 LINCOLN MKT FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4899 0.28

2015 LINCOLN MKX AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 4272 0.41

2015 LINCOLN MKX FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 4272 0.41

2015 LINCOLN MKZ 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 5 5 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3709 0.82

2015 LINCOLN MKZ 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 5 5 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3709 0.82

2015 LINCOLN MKZ HEV 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 5 5 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3709 0.82

2015 LINCOLN NAVIGATOR 4x2 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6125 0.02

2015 LINCOLN NAVIGATOR 4x4 SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6125 0.02

2015 LINCOLN NAVIGATOR EXTENDED SUV 4x2

SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6125 0.02




Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2015 MASERATI GHIBLI 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4629 0.56

2015 MASERATI GHIBLI 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4629 0.56

2015 MASERATI GRANTURISMO 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MASERATI GRANTURISMO CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MASERATI QUATTROPORTE 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MASERATI QUATTROPORTE 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MAZDA CX-5 AWD SUV SAFEST 2% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3333 0.61

2015 MAZDA CX-5 FWD SUV SAFEST 2% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3333 0.61

2015 MAZDA CX-9 AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] 4 3 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL MARGINAL POOR 4463 0.37

2015 MAZDA CX-9 FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] 4 3 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL MARGINAL POOR 4463 0.37

2015 MAZDA MAZDA3 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [16% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 2838 1.16

2015 MAZDA MAZDA3 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [16% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 2838 1.16

2015 MAZDA MAZDA5 STA. WGN. FWD

CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD note (C) ? GOOD POOR 3409 0.92

2015 MAZDA MAZDA6 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3199 1.00

2015 MAZDA MX-5 CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ B-CLASS E-CELL 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ C-CLASS 2 DR 4WD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ C-CLASS 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ C-CLASS 4 DR 4WD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ C-CLASS 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ CLA-CLASS 4 DR 4WD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ CLA-CLASS 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ CL-CLASS 2 DR 4WD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ CL-CLASS 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ CLS-CLASS 4 DR 4WD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ CLS-CLASS 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS 2 DR 4WD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3736 0.81

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3736 0.81

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS 4 DR 4WD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4079 0.70

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4079 0.70

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS STA. WGN.

4WDCAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4079 0.70


RWDCAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4079 0.70

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS CABRIO 2 DR 4WD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS CABRIO 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS HYBRID 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4079 0.70


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2015 MERCEDES-BENZ G-CLASS AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ GLA-CLASS 4 DR 4WD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ GLA-CLASS 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ GL-CLASS 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ GLK-CLASS 4 DR 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4157 0.43

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ GLK-CLASS 4 DR RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4157 0.43

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ ML-CLASS 4WD SUV SAFEST 1% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4754 0.31

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ ML-CLASS RWD SUV SAFEST 1% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4754 0.31

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ S-CLASS 4 DR 4WD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ S-CLASS 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ S-CLASS HYBRID 4 DR 4WD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ S-CLASS HYBRID 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ SL-CLASS CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ SLK-CLASS CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ SPRINTER 2500 4WD TRUCK VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ SPRINTER 2500 RWD TRUCK VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ SPRINTER 2500 CARGO VAN CARGO VAN




2015 MERCEDES-BENZ SPRINTER 2500 MIXTO 4WD TRUCK VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ SPRINTER 2500 MIXTO RWD TRUCK VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MERCEDES-BENZ SPRINTER 3500 CAB CHASSIS CAB CHASSIS








2015 MINI COOPER 2 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MINI COOPER CONVERTIBLE CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MINI COOPER COUNTRYMAN 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [9% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 2984 1.09

2015 MINI COOPER HARDTOP 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [19% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? 4 ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 2768 1.19

2015 MINI COOPER PACEMAN 3 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MINI COOPER ROADSTER CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MINI COOPER S 2 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MINI COOPER S CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MINI COOPER S COUNTRYMAN 5 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MINI COOPER S COUNTRYMAN ALL4 5 HB AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MINI COOPER S HARDTOP 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [19% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? 4 ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 2768 1.19


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2015 MINI COOPER S PACEMAN 3 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MINI COOPER S PACEMAN ALL4 3 HB AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MINI COOPER S ROADSTER CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MINI JCW 2 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MINI JCW CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MINI JCW COUNTRYMAN 5 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MINI JCW PACEMAN 3 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MINI JCW ROADSTER CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MITSUBISHI LANCER 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [2% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3139 1.02

2015 MITSUBISHI LANCER 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [2% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3139 1.02

2015 MITSUBISHI LANCER EVOLUTION 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 MITSUBISHI MIRAGE 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [57% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 2079 1.57

2015 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3458 0.58

2015 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3458 0.58

2015 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER SPORT AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3294 0.61

2015 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER SPORT FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3294 0.61

2015 NISSAN 370Z 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 NISSAN 370Z ROADSTER CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 NISSAN ALTIMA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [3% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3115 1.03

2015 NISSAN ARMADA 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 NISSAN ARMADA RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 NISSAN FRONTIER PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD ? ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 4265 0.52

2015 NISSAN FRONTIER PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD ? ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 4265 0.52

2015 NISSAN FRONTIER PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD ? ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 4265 0.52

2015 NISSAN FRONTIER PU/EC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD ? ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 4265 0.52

2015 NISSAN GTR 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 NISSAN LEAF 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3258 0.98

2015 NISSAN MURANO AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 NISSAN MURANO FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 NISSAN NV200 FWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 NISSAN PATHFINDER AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4431 0.38

2015 NISSAN PATHFINDER FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4431 0.38

2015 NISSAN QUEST FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE POOR 4501 0.59

2015 NISSAN ROGUE AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3542 0.56

2015 NISSAN ROGUE FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3542 0.56


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2015 NISSAN VERSA 4 DR FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [36% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

4 3 4 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 2433 1.36

2015 NISSAN XTERRA 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD ? MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ? 4322 0.40

2015 NISSAN XTERRA RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD ? MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ? 4322 0.40

2015 PORSCHE 911 CARRERA 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE 911 CARRERA 4 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE 911 CARRERA 4 CABRIOLET CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE 911 CARRERA 4 GTS 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE 911 CARRERA 4 GTS CABRIOLET CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE 911 CARRERA 4S 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE 911 CARRERA 4S CABRIOLET CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE 911 CARRERA CABRIOLET CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE 911 CARRERA GTS 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE 911 CARRERA GTS CABRIOLET CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE 911 CARRERA S 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE 911 CARRERA S CABRIOLET CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE 911 GT3 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE 911 GT3 RS 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE 911 TARGA 4 CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE 911 TARGA 4S CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE 911 TURBO 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE 911 TURBO CABRIOLET CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE 911 TURBO S 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE 911 TURBO S CABRIOLET CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE 918 SPYDER 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE BOXSTER CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE BOXSTER GTS CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE BOXSTER S CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE CAYENEE S AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE CAYENNE AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE CAYENNE DIESEL AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE CAYENNE GTS AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE CAYENNE S E-HYBRID AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE CAYENNE TURBO AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE CAYENNE TURBO S AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE CAYMAN 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2015 PORSCHE CAYMAN GT4 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE CAYMAN GTS 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE CAYMAN S 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE MACAN AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE MACAN S AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE MACAN TURBO AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE PANAMERA 5 HB RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE PANAMERA 4 5 HB AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE PANAMERA 4S 5 HB AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE PANAMERA 4S EXECUTIVE 5 HB AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE PANAMERA E-HYBIRD 5 HB AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE PANAMERA GTS 5 HB AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE PANAMERA S 5 HB RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE PANAMERA TURBO 5 HB AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE PANAMERA TURBO EXECUTIVE 5 HB AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE PANAMERA TURBO S 5 HB AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 PORSCHE PANAMERA TURBO S EXECUTIVE 5 HB AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 RAM 1500 PU/CC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD ? GOOD MARGINAL ? 5441 0.33

2015 RAM 1500 PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 NO GOOD ? GOOD MARGINAL ? 5441 0.33

2015 RAM 1500 PU/EC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD ? GOOD MARGINAL ? 5331 0.34

2015 RAM 1500 PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 NO GOOD ? GOOD MARGINAL ? 5331 0.34

2015 RAM 1500 PU/RC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD ? GOOD MARGINAL ? 5331 0.34

2015 RAM 1500 PU/RC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 NO GOOD ? GOOD MARGINAL ? 5331 0.34

2015 RAM 2500 PU/CC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6811 0.19

2015 RAM 2500 PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6811 0.19

2015 RAM 2500 PU/EC 2WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 RAM 2500 PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 RAM 2500 PU/RC 2WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 RAM 2500 PU/RC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 RAM CARGO FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 4605 0.57

2015 RAM PROMASTER 2WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 RAM PROMASTER CITY 2WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 ROLLS-ROYCE GHOST 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 ROLLS-ROYCE GHOST EWB 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 ROLLS-ROYCE PHANTOM 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r




2015 ROLLS-ROYCE PHANTOM CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 ROLLS-ROYCE PHANTOM EWB 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 ROLLS-ROYCE WRAITH 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 SMART CABRIO CONV. RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 SMART CABRIO ED CONV. RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [54% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 2123 1.54

2015 SMART COUPE 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [73% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 1828 1.73

2015 SMART ED 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [54% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 2123 1.54

2015 SRT CHALLENGER 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 SRT CHARGER 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 SRT GRAND CHEROKEE SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 SRT VIPER 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 SUBARU BRZ 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [20% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2746 1.20

2015 SUBARU FORESTER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3395 0.59

2015 SUBARU IMPREZA 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [11% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 2941 1.11

2015 SUBARU IMPREZA STA. WGN. AWD

CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [11% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 2941 1.11

2015 SUBARU LEGACY 4 DR AWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3628 0.84

2015 SUBARU OUTBACK AWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3628 0.84

2015 SUBARU WRX 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3420 0.92

2015 SUBARU XV CROSSTREK AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [4% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3111 1.04

2015 SUBARU XV CROSSTREK HYBRID AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [4% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3111 1.04

2015 TOYOTA 4RUNNER 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 4759 0.31

2015 TOYOTA 4RUNNER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 4759 0.31

2015 TOYOTA AVALON 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3575 0.86

2015 TOYOTA AVALON HYBRID 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3575 0.86

2015 TOYOTA CAMRY 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3212 1.00

2015 TOYOTA CAMRY HYBRID 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3212 1.00

2015 TOYOTA COROLLA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [15% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 2860 1.15

2015 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 4400 0.38

2015 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 4400 0.38

2015 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER HYBRID AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 4400 0.38

2015 TOYOTA LAND CRUISER AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 TOYOTA PRIUS 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [4% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3098 1.04

2015 TOYOTA PRIUS C 5 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [32% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]


2015 TOYOTA PRIUS PLUG-IN HYBRID 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [1% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3172 1.01


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2015 TOYOTA PRIUS V STA. WGN. FWD

CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3315 0.96

2015 TOYOTA RAV4 AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3560 0.56

2015 TOYOTA RAV4 FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3560 0.56

2015 TOYOTA SCION FR-S 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [20% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2746 1.20

2015 TOYOTA SCION IQ 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [54% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 3 4 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 2127 1.54

2015 TOYOTA SCION TC 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [3% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3122 1.03

2015 TOYOTA SCION XB STA. WGN. FWD

CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [5% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3078 1.05

2015 TOYOTA SEQUOIA 2WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2015 TOYOTA SIENNA AWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 4360 0.63

2015 TOYOTA SIENNA FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 4360 0.63

2015 TOYOTA TACOMA PU/CC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] 4 3 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 4321 0.51


2015 TOYOTA TACOMA PU/EC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD MARGINAL ? 4019 0.58

2015 TOYOTA TACOMA PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD MARGINAL ? 4019 0.58

2015 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/CC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 5735 0.29

2015 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 5735 0.29

2015 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/EC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? 5 3 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ? 5729 0.29

2015 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? 5 4 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ? 5729 0.29

2015 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/RC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? 5 3 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ? 5729 0.29

2015 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/RC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? 5 4 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ? 5729 0.29

2015 TOYOTA VENZA AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3956 0.48

2015 TOYOTA VENZA FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3956 0.48

2015 TOYOTA YARIS 3 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 TOYOTA YARIS 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [38% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 2396 1.38

2015 VOLKSWAGEN BEETLE 2 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom

71%] [7% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3040 1.07

2015 VOLKSWAGEN BEETLE CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 VOLKSWAGEN CC 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3419 0.92

2015 VOLKSWAGEN CC 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3419 0.92

2015 VOLKSWAGEN EOS CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 VOLKSWAGEN GOLF 2 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [1% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due

to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3166 1.01



2015 VOLKSWAGEN GOLF GTI 2 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [1% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due


2015 VOLKSWAGEN GOLF GTI 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [1% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due


2015 VOLKSWAGEN GOLF R 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2015 VOLKSWAGEN GOLF SPORTWAGEN STA. WGN.

FWDCAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2015 VOLKSWAGEN JETTA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [10% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb.

passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 2963 1.10

2015 VOLKSWAGEN JETTA HEV 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [10% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb.

passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 2963 1.10

2015 VOLKSWAGEN PASSAT 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 4% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3203 1.00

2015 VOLKSWAGEN TIGUAN AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom

15%] 4 3 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3630 0.54

2015 VOLKSWAGEN TIGUAN FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom


2015 VOLKSWAGEN TOUAREG AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4809 0.30

2015 VOLKSWAGEN TOUAREG HYBRID AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4809 0.30

2015 VOLVO S60 4 DR AWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3863 0.77

2015 VOLVO S60 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3863 0.77

2015 VOLVO S80 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3563 0.86

2015 VOLVO S80 4 DR FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 4172 0.43

2015 VOLVO V60 STA. WGN. AWD

CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD n/a weight n/a

2015 VOLVO V60 STA. WGN. FWD

CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD n/a weight n/a

2015 VOLVO V60 CC STA. WGN. AWD

CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3563 0.86

2015 VOLVO V60 CC STA. WGN. FWD

CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3563 0.86

2015 VOLVO XC60 AWD SUV SAFEST 1% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4180 0.43

2015 VOLVO XC60 FWD SUV SAFEST 1% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4180 0.43


2015 VOLVO XC70 STA. WGN. AWD

SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2015 VOLVO XC70 STA. WGN. FWD


2014 ACURA ILX 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [11% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2950 1.11

2014 ACURA ILX HYBRID 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [11% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2950 1.11

2014 ACURA MDX AWD SUV SAFEST 1% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4264 0.41

2014 ACURA MDX FWD SUV SAFEST 1% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4264 0.41

2014 ACURA RDX AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3821 0.50

2014 ACURA RDX FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3821 0.50

2014 ACURA RLX 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3919 0.75

2014 ACURA RLX SPORT HYBRID 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 ACURA TL 4 DR 4WD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3984 0.73

2014 ACURA TL 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3984 0.73

2014 ACURA TSX 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3634 0.84

2014 ACURA TSX SPORT WAGON STA. WGN. FWD

CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3567 0.86

2014 AUDI A4 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3676 0.83


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2014 AUDI A4 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3676 0.83




2014 AUDI A6 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 5 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3951 0.74

2014 AUDI A6 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 5 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3951 0.74




2014 AUDI ALLROAD STA. WGN. AWD


2014 AUDI Q5 AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4189 0.43

2014 AUDI Q5 HEV AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4189 0.43





2014 AUDI RS5 CABRIO CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 AUDI RS5 CABRIO CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a





2014 AUDI S5 CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a




2014 AUDI SQ5 AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 4189 0.43


2014 AUDI TT CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2014 BENTLEY CONTINENTAL GT 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 BENTLEY CONTINENTAL GT SPEED 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 BENTLEY CONTINENTAL GT SPEED CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 BENTLEY CONTINENTAL GT V8 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2014 BENTLEY CONTINENTAL GTC CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 BENTLEY CONTINENTAL GTC V8 CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 BENTLEY FLYING SPUR V8 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 BENTLEY FLYING SPUR W12 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 BENTLEY MULSANNE 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2014 BMW 135IS CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2014 BMW 328D 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3399 0.92

2014 BMW 328D XDRIVE 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3399 0.92





CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3399 0.92








2014 BMW 535I GT 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3945 0.74


2014 BMW 535I XDRIVE GT 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3945 0.74


2014 BMW 550I GT 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3945 0.74


2014 BMW 550I XDRIVE GT 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3945 0.74







Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



















2014 BMW ACTIVE HYBRID 535I 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3945 0.74

2014 BMW ACTIVE HYBRID 7 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a





2014 BMW X1 SDRIVE28I RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3660 0.54



2014 BMW X3 XDRIVE28I AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4135 0.44

2014 BMW X3 XDRIVE35I AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4135 0.44

2014 BMW X5 SDRIVE35I RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 BMW X5 XDRIVE35D AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 BMW X5 XDRIVE35I AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 BMW X5 XDRIVE50I AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 BMW X6 M AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 BMW X6 XDRIVE35I AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a




Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r





2014 BUICK ENCLAVE AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2014 BUICK ENCLAVE FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2014 BUICK ENCORE AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3346 0.60

2014 BUICK ENCORE FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 4 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3346 0.60

2014 BUICK LACROSSE 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4255 0.66

2014 BUICK LACROSSE 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4255 0.66

2014 BUICK LACROSSE EASSIST 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4255 0.66

2014 BUICK LACROSSE EASSIST 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4255 0.66

2014 BUICK REGAL 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3676 0.83

2014 BUICK REGAL 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3676 0.83

2014 BUICK REGAL EASSIST 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3676 0.83

2014 BUICK VERANO 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3419 0.92



2014 CADILLAC CTS 2 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD note (C) ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 CADILLAC CTS 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD note (C) ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 CADILLAC CTS 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 5 ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? 3786 0.79

2014 CADILLAC CTS 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 5 ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? 3786 0.79

2014 CADILLAC CTS STA. WGN. AWD

CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 CADILLAC CTS STA. WGN. RWD


2014 CADILLAC CTS-V 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? 4074 0.71

2014 CADILLAC CTS-V 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? 4074 0.71

2014 CADILLAC ELR 2 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 CADILLAC ESCALADE AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5678 0.11

2014 CADILLAC ESCALADE RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5678 0.11

2014 CADILLAC ESCALADE ESV AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5830 0.08

2014 CADILLAC ESCALADE ESV RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5830 0.08

2014 CADILLAC SRX AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4550 0.35

2014 CADILLAC SRX FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4550 0.35

2014 CADILLAC XTS 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4268 0.65

2014 CADILLAC XTS 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4268 0.65




Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r




2014 CHEVROLET CAPTIVA AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 3 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3762 0.52

2014 CHEVROLET CAPTIVA FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 3 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3762 0.52



2014 CHEVROLET CRUZE 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [5% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3073 1.05

2014 CHEVROLET EQUINOX AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3936 0.48

2014 CHEVROLET EQUINOX FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3936 0.48

2014 CHEVROLET EXPRESS PASSENGER 1500 AWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a





2014 CHEVROLET IMPALA 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? 3606 0.85

2014 CHEVROLET IMPALA LIMITED 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 4 4 ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? 3588 0.86

2014 CHEVROLET MALIBU 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3593 0.85

2014 CHEVROLET MALIBU ECO EASSIST 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3593 0.85

2014 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 PU/CC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? 5540 0.31

2014 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 PU/CC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? 5540 0.31

2014 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 PU/EC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? 5262 0.35

2014 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 PU/EC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? 5262 0.35

2014 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 PU/RC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 PU/RC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19

2014 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19

2014 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/RC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 2 2 2 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6455 0.22

2014 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/RC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 2 2 2 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6455 0.22

2014 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 (later release) PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 4 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19

2014 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 (later release) PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 4 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19








Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2014 CHEVROLET SPARK 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [44% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2281 1.44

2014 CHEVROLET SPARK EV 5 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [44% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2296 1.44

2014 CHEVROLET SS 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 CHEVROLET SUBURBAN 1500 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5830 0.08

2014 CHEVROLET SUBURBAN 1500 RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5830 0.08



2014 CHEVROLET TRAVERSE AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2014 CHEVROLET TRAVERSE FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2014 CHEVROLET VOLT 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3753 0.80

2014 CHRYSLER 200 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] 4 4 3 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3399 0.92

2014 CHRYSLER 200 CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 CHRYSLER 300 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4299 0.64

2014 CHRYSLER 300 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4299 0.64

2014 CHRYSLER TOWN AND COUNTRY FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4605 0.57

2014 DODGE AVENGER 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3604 0.85

2014 DODGE CHALLENGER 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3874 0.76

2014 DODGE CHARGER 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 5 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4242 0.66

2014 DODGE CHARGER 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 5 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4242 0.66

2014 DODGE CHARGER PURSUIT 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4054 0.71


2014 DODGE DURANGO 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4946 0.27

2014 DODGE DURANGO 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4946 0.27

2014 DODGE GRAND CARAVAN FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4605 0.57

2014 DODGE JOURNEY 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4200 0.42

2014 DODGE JOURNEY FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4200 0.42

2014 FIAT 500 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [36% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 2438 1.36

2014 FIAT 500 ABARTH 3 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 FIAT 500 CABRIO 3 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 FIAT 500E 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [34% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 2469 1.34

2014 FIAT 500L 5 HB 2WD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3317 0.95


2014 FORD CMAX HEV 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3637 0.84

2014 FORD E-150 RWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 FORD E-150 WAGON RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2014 FORD E-350 RWD VAN VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 FORD E-350 P12 RWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2014 FORD EDGE AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4272 0.41

2014 FORD EDGE FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4272 0.41

2014 FORD ESCAPE 4x2 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3782 0.51

2014 FORD ESCAPE 4x4 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3782 0.51

2014 FORD EXPEDITION 4x2 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5841 0.08

2014 FORD EXPEDITION 4x4 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5841 0.08

2014 FORD EXPEDITION EXTENDED SUV 4x2

SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5841 0.08



2014 FORD EXPLORER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 4633 0.33

2014 FORD EXPLORER FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 4633 0.33

2014 FORD F-150 REGULAR CAB PU/RC 4x2 PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ? 5720 0.29

2014 FORD F-150 REGULAR CAB PU/RC 4x4 PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ? 5720 0.29

2014 FORD F-150 SUPER CREW PU/CC 4x2 PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 5680 0.30

2014 FORD F-150 SUPER CREW PU/CC 4x4 PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 3 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 5680 0.30

2014 FORD F-150 SUPERCAB PU/EC 4x2 PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ? 5720 0.29

2014 FORD F-150 SUPERCAB PU/EC 4x4 PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ? 5720 0.29









2014 FORD F-350 SUPER CREW PC/CC 4x2 PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 FORD F-350 SUPER CREW PC/CC 4x4 PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2014 FORD FIESTA 4 DR FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [26% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]


2014 FORD FIESTA 5 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [26% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]


2014 FORD FLEX AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4639 0.33

2014 FORD FLEX FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4639 0.33


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2014 FORD FOCUS 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [10% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2961 1.10

2014 FORD FOCUS 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [10% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2961 1.10

2014 FORD FOCUS BEV 5 HB FWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3639 0.84




2014 FORD FUSION HEV 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 5 5 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3709 0.82

2014 FORD MUSTANG 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 5 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? ? 3511 0.88

2014 FORD MUSTANG CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 FORD TAURUS 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4145 0.69

2014 FORD TAURUS 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4145 0.69

2014 FORD TRANSIT CONNECT FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? 4 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 4440 0.61

2014 FREIGHTLINER SPRINTER 2500 RWD TRUCK NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 1%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 1 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a




2014 GMC ACADIA AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2014 GMC ACADIA FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2014 GMC ACADIA DENALI AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2014 GMC ACADIA DENALI FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2014 GMC SAVANA PASSENGER 1500 AWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a





2014 GMC SIERRA 1500 PU/CC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? 5540 0.31

2014 GMC SIERRA 1500 PU/CC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? 5540 0.31

2014 GMC SIERRA 1500 PU/EC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? 5262 0.35

2014 GMC SIERRA 1500 PU/EC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? 5262 0.35

2014 GMC SIERRA 1500 PU/RC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 GMC SIERRA 1500 PU/RC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19

2014 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19

2014 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/RC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 2 2 2 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6455 0.22

2014 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/RC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 2 2 2 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6455 0.22

2014 GMC SIERRA 2500 (later release) PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 4 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2014 GMC SIERRA 2500 (later release) PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 4 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19





2014 GMC TERRAIN AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3936 0.48

2014 GMC TERRAIN FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3936 0.48





2014 GMC YUKON DENALI XL 1500 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5830 0.08

2014 GMC YUKON DENALI XL 1500 RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5830 0.08

2014 GMC YUKON XL 1500 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5830 0.08

2014 GMC YUKON XL 1500 RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5830 0.08

2014 HONDA ACCORD 2 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3311 0.96


2014 HONDA ACCORD HYBRID 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3386 0.93

2014 HONDA ACCORD PLUG IN HYBRID 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3235 0.99





2014 HONDA CROSSTOUR 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4096 0.45

2014 HONDA CROSSTOUR FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4096 0.45

2014 HONDA CR-V 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3463 0.58

2014 HONDA CR-V FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3463 0.58

2014 HONDA CR-Z 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [23% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 3 5 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2688 1.23

2014 HONDA FCX 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 HONDA FIT EV 5 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 HONDA INSIGHT 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [21% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2724 1.21

2014 HONDA ODYSSEY FWD VAN SAFEST 2% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4400 0.62

2014 HONDA PILOT 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4495 0.36

2014 HONDA PILOT FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4495 0.36


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2014 HONDA RIDGELINE PU/CC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4496 0.48





2014 HYUNDAI AZERA 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3626 0.84

2014 HYUNDAI ELANTRA 2 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [20% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2748 1.20



2014 HYUNDAI EQUUS 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4528 0.59

2014 HYUNDAI GENESIS 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ? 3862 0.77

2014 HYUNDAI GENESIS 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3862 0.77

2014 HYUNDAI SANTA FE AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3877 0.49

2014 HYUNDAI SANTA FE FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3877 0.49

2014 HYUNDAI SANTA FE SPORT AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3733 0.52

2014 HYUNDAI SANTA FE SPORT FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3733 0.52

2014 HYUNDAI SONATA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3225 0.99

2014 HYUNDAI SONATA HYBRID 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3225 0.99

2014 HYUNDAI TUCSON AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3414 0.59

2014 HYUNDAI TUCSON FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3414 0.59

2014 HYUNDAI VELOSTER 3C FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [21% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

5 4 5 4 NO GOOD note (C) ? GOOD MARGINAL 2724 1.21

2014 INFINITI Q50 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3852 0.77

2014 INFINITI Q50 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3852 0.77

2014 INFINITI Q50 HYBRID 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3852 0.77

2014 INFINITI Q50 HYBRID 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3852 0.77

2014 INFINITI Q60 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2014 INFINITI Q60 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 INFINITI Q60 CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 INFINITI Q70 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 4037 0.72

2014 INFINITI Q70 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 4037 0.72

2014 INFINITI Q70 HYBRID 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4037 0.72

2014 INFINITI QX50 STA. WGN. AWD


2014 INFINITI QX50 STA. WGN. RWD


2014 INFINITI QX60 AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 4325 0.40

2014 INFINITI QX60 FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 4325 0.40

2014 INFINITI QX60 HYBRID AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 4325 0.40

2014 INFINITI QX60 HYBRID FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 4325 0.40

2014 INFINITI QX70 AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD ? GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 INFINITI QX70 RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD ? GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 INFINITI QX80 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2014 JAGUAR F-TYPE CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a










Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r





2014 JEEP COMPASS 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3322 0.61

2014 JEEP COMPASS 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3322 0.61

2014 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 4675 0.32

2014 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 4675 0.32

2014 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE (later release) 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 5 5 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 4679 0.32

2014 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE (later release) 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 4679 0.32

2014 JEEP PATRIOT 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 3 5 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3344 0.60

2014 JEEP PATRIOT 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 3 5 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3344 0.60

2014 JEEP WRANGLER 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD MARGINAL ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 JEEP WRANGLER UNLIMITED 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD MARGINAL ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 KIA CADENZA 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3626 0.84

2014 KIA FORTE 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [17% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 3 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 2807 1.17

2014 KIA FORTE 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [17% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 3 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 2807 1.17







2014 KIA SEDONA FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 2%] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR ? 4464 0.60

2014 KIA SORENTO AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3788 0.51

2014 KIA SORENTO FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3788 0.51

2014 KIA SOUL FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS ratings incomplete] [15% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2853 1.15

2014 KIA SPORTAGE AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3370 0.60


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2014 KIA SPORTAGE FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 4 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3370 0.60

2014 LAND ROVER LR2 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 LAND ROVER LR4 (5 SEAT) 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2014 LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER (SWB) 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER EVOQUE (3-DOOR) 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2014 LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER SPORT (5 SEAT) 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER SPORT (7 SEAT) 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 LEXUS CT200H 5 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3229 0.99


2014 LEXUS ES350 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3575 0.86

2014 LEXUS GS350 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3743 0.80

2014 LEXUS GS350 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3743 0.80

2014 LEXUS GS450H 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3743 0.80


2014 LEXUS IS F 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD ? GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a







2014 LEXUS LS460 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD ? GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2014 LEXUS LS460 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD ? GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 LEXUS LS460L 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD ? GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 LEXUS LS460L 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD ? GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 LEXUS LS600HL 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD ? GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a


2014 LEXUS RX350 AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4402 0.38

2014 LEXUS RX350 FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4402 0.38

2014 LEXUS RX450H AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4402 0.38

2014 LEXUS RX450H FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4402 0.38

2014 LINCOLN MKS 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4145 0.69

2014 LINCOLN MKS 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4145 0.69

2014 LINCOLN MKT AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4899 0.28

2014 LINCOLN MKT FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4899 0.28

2014 LINCOLN MKX AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4272 0.41

2014 LINCOLN MKX FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4272 0.41




2014 LINCOLN NAVIGATOR 4x2 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5841 0.08

2014 LINCOLN NAVIGATOR 4x4 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5841 0.08





2014 MAZDA CX-5 AWD SUV SAFEST 2% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3333 0.61

2014 MAZDA CX-5 FWD SUV SAFEST 2% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3333 0.61


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r





2014 MAZDA MAZDA2 5 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [42% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

? ? ? ? NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE GOOD MARGINAL 2321 1.42

2014 MAZDA MAZDA3 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [16% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 2838 1.16

2014 MAZDA MAZDA3 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [16% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 2838 1.16


CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD note (C) ? GOOD POOR 3409 0.92

2014 MAZDA MAZDA6 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3199 1.00


2014 MERCEDES-BENZ B-CLASS E-CELL 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 MERCEDES-BENZ C-CLASS 2 DR 4WD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in

bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3510 0.88

2014 MERCEDES-BENZ C-CLASS 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in

bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3510 0.88

2014 MERCEDES-BENZ C-CLASS 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom


2014 MERCEDES-BENZ C-CLASS 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom


2014 MERCEDES-BENZ CLA-CLASS 4 DR 4WD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 MERCEDES-BENZ CLA-CLASS 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a





2014 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS 2 DR 4WD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3736 0.81

2014 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3736 0.81

2014 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4079 0.70

2014 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4079 0.70


4WDCAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4079 0.70


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r




RWDCAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4079 0.70

2014 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS CABRIOLET CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS HYBRID 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4079 0.70



2014 MERCEDES-BENZ GLK-CLASS 4 DR 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4157 0.43

2014 MERCEDES-BENZ GLK-CLASS 4 DR RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4157 0.43

2014 MERCEDES-BENZ ML-CLASS 4WD SUV SAFEST 1% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4754 0.31

2014 MERCEDES-BENZ ML-CLASS RWD SUV SAFEST 1% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4754 0.31





2014 MERCEDES-BENZ SLS AMG 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 MERCEDES-BENZ SLS AMG CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 MERCEDES-BENZ SPRINTER 2500 RWD TRUCK NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 1%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 1 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a




2014 MINI COOPER CLUBMAN STA. WGN. FWD



2014 MINI COOPER COUPE 2 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 MINI COOPER HARDTOP 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [19% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 4 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? 2768 1.19




Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2014 MINI COOPER S CLUBMAN STA. WGN. FWD


2014 MINI COOPER S CONVERTIBLE CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2014 MINI COOPER S COUPE 2 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 MINI COOPER S HARDTOP 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [19% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 2768 1.19




2014 MINI JCW CLUBMAN STA. WGN. FWD


2014 MINI JCW CONVERTIBLE CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 MINI JCW COUNTRYMAN ALL4 5 HB AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 MINI JCW COUPE 2 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 MINI JCW PACEMAN 3 HB AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2014 MITSUBISHI IMIEV 5 HB RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [28% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 3 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 2576 1.28




2014 MITSUBISHI LANCER SPORTBACK 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [2% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 4 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3139 1.02

2014 MITSUBISHI MIRAGE 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [58% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 2061 1.58

2014 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3458 0.58

2014 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3458 0.58

2014 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER SPORT AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3386 0.60


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2014 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER SPORT FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3386 0.60

2014 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER SPORT (later release) AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3294 0.61

2014 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER SPORT (later release) FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3294 0.61






2014 NISSAN CUBE FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [16% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2833 1.16

2014 NISSAN FRONTIER PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 4265 0.52

2014 NISSAN FRONTIER PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 4265 0.52

2014 NISSAN FRONTIER PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD note (C) ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 4265 0.52

2014 NISSAN FRONTIER PU/EC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD note (C) ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 4265 0.52


2014 NISSAN JUKE AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [2% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 3 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3146 1.02

2014 NISSAN JUKE FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [2% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 3 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3146 1.02

2014 NISSAN LEAF 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3258 0.98

2014 NISSAN MAXIMA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] 4 3 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE 3546 0.87

2014 NISSAN MURANO AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 3956 0.48

2014 NISSAN MURANO FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 3956 0.48

2014 NISSAN MURANO CROSSCABRIOLET AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 NISSAN NV1500 RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 NISSAN NV200 FWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 NISSAN NV2500 RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2014 NISSAN NV3500 RWD VAN VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 NISSAN PATHFINDER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? 4325 0.40

2014 NISSAN PATHFINDER FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? 4325 0.40

2014 NISSAN PATHFINDER HYBRID AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? 4325 0.40

2014 NISSAN PATHFINDER HYBRID FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? 4325 0.40


2014 NISSAN ROGUE AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] 4 3 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3551 0.56

2014 NISSAN ROGUE FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] 4 3 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3551 0.56

2014 NISSAN ROGUE SELECT AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL 4101 0.45

2014 NISSAN ROGUE SELECT FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL 4101 0.45

2014 NISSAN SENTRA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [14% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 2862 1.14

2014 NISSAN TITAN PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD ? GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 5008 0.39

2014 NISSAN TITAN PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD ? GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 5008 0.39

2014 NISSAN TITAN PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD ? GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 5008 0.39

2014 NISSAN TITAN PU/EC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD ? GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 5008 0.39



2014 NISSAN VERSA NOTE 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [38% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 3 5 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? 2391 1.38

2014 NISSAN XTERRA 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ? 4322 0.40

2014 NISSAN XTERRA RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ? 4322 0.40

2014 PORSCHE 918 CABRIOLET CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 PORSCHE MACAN S AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 PORSCHE MACAN S DIESEL AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 PORSCHE MACAN TURBO AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2014 PORSCHE PANAMERA TURBO EXECUTIVE 5 HB AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 RAM 1500 PU/CC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD ? GOOD MARGINAL ? 5441 0.33

2014 RAM 1500 PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 NO GOOD ? GOOD MARGINAL ? 5441 0.33

2014 RAM 1500 PU/EC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD ? GOOD MARGINAL ? 5331 0.34

2014 RAM 1500 PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 NO GOOD ? GOOD MARGINAL ? 5331 0.34









2014 RAM PROMASTER 2WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a





2014 ROLLS-ROYCE WRAITH 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2014 SMART CABRIO ED CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2014 SRT 300 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2014 SRT CHALLENGER 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 SRT CHARGER 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 SRT GRAND CHEROKEE 2WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 SRT GRAND CHEROKEE 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2014 SUBARU BRZ 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [20% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2746 1.20

2014 SUBARU FORESTER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3395 0.59

2014 SUBARU IMPREZA 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [11% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 2941 1.11


CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [11% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 2941 1.11

2014 SUBARU IMPREZA WRX 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 SUBARU IMPREZA WRX STA. WGN. AWD


2014 SUBARU IMPREZA WRX/STI 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 SUBARU IMPREZA WRX/STI STA. WGN. AWD

CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 SUBARU LEGACY 4 DR AWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3428 0.91

2014 SUBARU OUTBACK AWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3428 0.91

2014 SUBARU TRIBECA AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4194 0.43

2014 SUBARU XV CROSSTREK AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [4% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3111 1.04

2014 SUBARU XV CROSSTREK HYBRID AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [4% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3111 1.04

2014 SUZUKI GRAND VITARA AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 SUZUKI GRAND VITARA RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 SUZUKI KIZASHI 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 SUZUKI KIZASHI 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 SUZUKI SX4 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [19% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 3 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 2765 1.19

2014 SUZUKI SX4 5 HB AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [19% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 3 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 2765 1.19


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2014 SUZUKI SX4 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [19% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 3 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 2765 1.19

2014 TESLA MODEL S 5 HB RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 4321 0.64

2014 TOYOTA 4RUNNER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 4759 0.31

2014 TOYOTA 4RUNNER FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 4759 0.31

2014 TOYOTA AVALON 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3575 0.86

2014 TOYOTA AVALON HYBRID 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3575 0.86

2014 TOYOTA CAMRY 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3210 1.00

2014 TOYOTA CAMRY (later release) 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3212 1.00

2014 TOYOTA CAMRY HV 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3212 1.00

2014 TOYOTA COROLLA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [15% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 5 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 2860 1.15

2014 TOYOTA FJ CRUISER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 4338 0.40

2014 TOYOTA FJ CRUISER FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 4338 0.40

2014 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 4400 0.38

2014 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 4400 0.38

2014 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER HV AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 4400 0.38

2014 TOYOTA LANDCRUISER AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2014 TOYOTA PRIUS 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [4% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3098 1.04



2014 TOYOTA PRIUS PLUG-IN HYBRID 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [1% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3172 1.01


CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3315 0.96

2014 TOYOTA RAV4 AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3560 0.56

2014 TOYOTA RAV4 FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3560 0.56

2014 TOYOTA RAV4 EV FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3516 0.57

2014 TOYOTA SCION FR-S 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [20% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2746 1.20


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r




2014 TOYOTA SCION TC 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [3% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3122 1.03


CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [5% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3078 1.05

2014 TOYOTA SCION XD 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [25% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2641 1.25



2014 TOYOTA SIENNA AWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4684 0.55

2014 TOYOTA SIENNA FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4684 0.55



2014 TOYOTA TACOMA PU/EC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD MARGINAL ? 4019 0.58


2014 TOYOTA TACOMA PU/RC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD MARGINAL ? 4019 0.58


2014 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/CC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 5658 0.30

2014 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 5658 0.30

2014 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/EC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 2 5 3 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ? 5729 0.29

2014 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 2 5 4 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ? 5729 0.29

2014 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/RC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 2 5 3 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ? 5729 0.29

2014 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/RC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 2 5 4 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ? 5729 0.29

2014 TOYOTA VENZA AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3956 0.48

2014 TOYOTA VENZA FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3956 0.48

2014 TOYOTA YARIS 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [38% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 2396 1.38

2014 TOYOTA YARIS LIFTBACK 3 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [38% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

? ? ? ? NO GOOD note (C) ? GOOD MARGINAL 2387 1.38


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r






2014 VOLKSWAGEN CC 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3419 0.92

2014 VOLKSWAGEN CC 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3419 0.92


2014 VOLKSWAGEN GOLF 2 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [7% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200

lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3042 1.07

2014 VOLKSWAGEN GOLF 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [7% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200

lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3042 1.07

2014 VOLKSWAGEN GTI 2 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [7% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200

lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3042 1.07

2014 VOLKSWAGEN GTI 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [7% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200

lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3042 1.07

2014 VOLKSWAGEN JETTA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom


2014 VOLKSWAGEN JETTA HEV 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom


2014 VOLKSWAGEN JETTA SPORTWAGEN STA. WGN.

FWDCAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3234 0.99


2014 VOLKSWAGEN ROUTAN FWD VAN VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a





2014 VOLKSWAGEN TOUAREG AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4809 0.30

2014 VOLKSWAGEN TOUAREG HYBRID AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4809 0.30




2014 VOLVO S80 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3756 0.80




Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r







2014 VOLVO XC90 AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4718 0.32

2014 VOLVO XC90 FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4718 0.32

2013 ACURA ILX 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [11% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2950 1.11

2013 ACURA ILX HYBRID 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [11% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 2950 1.11

2013 ACURA MDX 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4565 0.35

2013 ACURA RDX 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3806 0.51

2013 ACURA RDX FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3806 0.51



2013 ACURA TSX 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3634 0.84


CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3567 0.86

2013 ACURA ZDX 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD ? GOOD ? ? 4431 0.38

2013 AUDI A3 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3224 0.99

2013 AUDI A3 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3224 0.99

2013 AUDI A4 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3676 0.83

2013 AUDI A4 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3676 0.83








Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r





2013 AUDI ALLROAD 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? 5 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 3676 0.83

2013 AUDI Q5 AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4237 0.42

2013 AUDI Q5 HEV AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4237 0.42





2013 AUDI RS5 CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 AUDI RS5 CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a









2013 AUDI TT ROADSTER CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 AUDI TT RS 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2013 BENTLEY CONTINENTAL FLYING SPUR 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r





2013 BENTLEY CONTINENTAL SUPERSPORTS CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a






2013 BMW 135IS 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 BMW 135IS CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 BMW 328I 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3516 0.88

2013 BMW 328I 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3399 0.92

2013 BMW 328I CONV. RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD MARGINAL ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 BMW 328I XDRIVE 2 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3516 0.88

2013 BMW 328I XDRIVE 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3399 0.92






2013 BMW 335IS 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3516 0.88

2013 BMW 335IS CONV. RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD MARGINAL ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 BMW 335IS HP 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3516 0.88

2013 BMW 335IS HP CONV. RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD MARGINAL ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r





2013 BMW 528XI 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3945 0.74


2013 BMW 535I GT 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3945 0.74


2013 BMW 535I XDRIVE GT 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3945 0.74







2013 BMW 640I GRAN 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2013 BMW 650I GRAN 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 BMW 650I XDRIVE GRAN 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a








Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r







2013 BMW ACTIVE HYBRID 535I 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3945 0.74

2013 BMW ACTIVE HYBRID 740LI 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a






2013 BMW X1 SDRIVE28I 4 DR RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3660 0.54

2013 BMW X1 XDRIVE28I 4 DR AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3660 0.54

2013 BMW X1 XDRIVE35I 4 DR AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3660 0.54

2013 BMW X3 XDRIVE28I AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4135 0.44


2013 BMW X5 M AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? 4704 0.32

2013 BMW X5 XDRIVE35D AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? 4704 0.32

2013 BMW X5 XDRIVE35I AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? 4704 0.32

2013 BMW X5 XDRIVE50I AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? 4704 0.32






Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r





2013 BUICK ENCLAVE AWD SUV SAFEST 1% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2013 BUICK ENCLAVE FWD SUV SAFEST 1% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2013 BUICK ENCORE AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3346 0.60

2013 BUICK ENCORE FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 4 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3346 0.60

2013 BUICK LACROSSE 4 DR AWD CAR SAFEST 2% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4255 0.66

2013 BUICK LACROSSE 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 2% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4255 0.66

2013 BUICK LACROSSE EASSIST 4 DR AWD CAR SAFEST 2% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4255 0.66

2013 BUICK LACROSSE EASSIST 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 2% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4255 0.66

2013 BUICK REGAL 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3676 0.83

2013 BUICK REGAL EASSIST 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3676 0.83

2013 BUICK VERANO 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 3% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3419 0.92



2013 CADILLAC CTS 2 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ? 3939 0.74

2013 CADILLAC CTS 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ? 3939 0.74

2013 CADILLAC CTS 4 DR AWD CAR SAFEST 2% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4074 0.71

2013 CADILLAC CTS 4 DR RWD CAR SAFEST 2% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4074 0.71


CAR SAFEST 2% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4074 0.71







Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r




2013 CADILLAC ESCALADE EXT AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 CADILLAC ESCALADE HYBRID AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5678 0.11

2013 CADILLAC ESCALADE HYBRID RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5678 0.11

2013 CADILLAC SRX AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4550 0.35

2013 CADILLAC SRX FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4550 0.35

2013 CADILLAC XTS 4 DR AWD CAR SAFEST 2% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4268 0.65

2013 CADILLAC XTS 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 2% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4268 0.65

2013 CHEVROLET AVALANCHE 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 CHEVROLET AVALANCHE RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a




2013 CHEVROLET CAPTIVA AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 CHEVROLET CAPTIVA FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2013 CHEVROLET CORVETTE Z06 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 CHEVROLET CORVETTE ZR1 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 CHEVROLET CRUZE 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [5% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3073 1.05

2013 CHEVROLET EQUINOX AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3936 0.48

2013 CHEVROLET EQUINOX FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3936 0.48




Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r






2013 CHEVROLET IMPALA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 3588 0.86

2013 CHEVROLET MALIBU 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3593 0.85

2013 CHEVROLET MALIBU (later release) 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3593 0.85

2013 CHEVROLET MALIBU ECO EASSIST 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3593 0.85

2013 CHEVROLET MALIBU ECO EASSIST (later release) 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3593 0.85

2013 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? 5342 0.34

2013 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? 5342 0.34

2013 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD note (C) ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? 5249 0.35

2013 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 PU/EC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD note (C) ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? 5249 0.35

2013 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 PU/RC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD note (C) ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? 5249 0.35

2013 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 PU/RC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD note (C) ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? 5249 0.35

2013 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 HYBRID PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? 5342 0.34

2013 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 HYBRID PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? 5342 0.34

2013 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 4 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19

2013 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 4 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19

2013 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 2 2 4 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6455 0.22

2013 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/EC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 2 2 4 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6455 0.22

2013 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/RC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 2 2 2 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6455 0.22

2013 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/RC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 2 2 2 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6455 0.22

2013 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 (later release) PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19

2013 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 (later release) PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r









2013 CHEVROLET SONIC 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [16% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 2820 1.16


2013 CHEVROLET SPARK 5 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [44% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2296 1.44



2013 CHEVROLET SUBURBAN 2500 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 CHEVROLET SUBURBAN 2500 RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2013 CHEVROLET TAHOE HYBRID 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5678 0.11

2013 CHEVROLET TAHOE HYBRID RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5678 0.11

2013 CHEVROLET TRAVERSE AWD SUV SAFEST 1% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2013 CHEVROLET TRAVERSE FWD SUV SAFEST 1% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2013 CHEVROLET VOLT 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3753 0.80



2013 CHRYSLER 300 4 DR AWD CAR SAFEST 2% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4299 0.64

2013 CHRYSLER 300 4 DR RWD CAR SAFEST 2% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4299 0.64


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2013 CHRYSLER TOWN AND COUNTRY FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4605 0.57

2013 CODA CODA 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2013 DODGE CHALLENGER 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3874 0.76

2013 DODGE CHARGER 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4242 0.66

2013 DODGE CHARGER 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4242 0.66

2013 DODGE CHARGER PURSUIT 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4054 0.71

2013 DODGE CHARGER PURSUIT 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4054 0.71


2013 DODGE DURANGO 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4930 0.27


2013 DODGE GRAND CARAVAN FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4605 0.57

2013 DODGE JOURNEY 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4200 0.42

2013 DODGE JOURNEY FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4200 0.42

2013 FIAT 500 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [36% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 2438 1.36

2013 FIAT 500C 2 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 FIAT ABARTH 3 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2013 FORD E-150 WAGON WAGON RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 FORD E-350 WAGON RWD VAN VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2013 FORD EDGE AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] 4 3 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4272 0.41


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2013 FORD EDGE FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] 4 3 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4272 0.41

2013 FORD ESCAPE 4x2 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3782 0.51

2013 FORD ESCAPE 4x4 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3782 0.51







2013 FORD EXPLORER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 4633 0.33

2013 FORD EXPLORER FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 4633 0.33



2013 FORD F-150 SUPER CREW PU/CC 4x2 PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] 4 3 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 5680 0.30

2013 FORD F-150 SUPER CREW PU/CC 4x4 PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 3 5 3 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 5680 0.30









2013 FORD F-350 PU/EC 4x2 PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 FORD F-350 PU/EC 4x4 PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 FORD F-350 PU/RC 4x2 PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2013 FORD F-350 PU/RC 4x4 PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2013 FORD FIESTA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [26% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2618 1.26

2013 FORD FIESTA 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [26% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2618 1.26

2013 FORD FLEX AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4639 0.33

2013 FORD FLEX FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4639 0.33



2013 FORD FOCUS BEV 5 HB FWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3639 0.84




2013 FORD FUSION HYBRID 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 5 5 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3709 0.82



2013 FORD TAURUS 4 DR AWD CAR SAFEST 2% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4145 0.69

2013 FORD TAURUS 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 2% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4145 0.69

2013 FORD TRANSIT CONNECT FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 2 3 2 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3472 0.90


2013 FREIGHTLINER SPRINTER 2500 CARGO VAN



2013 FREIGHTLINER SPRINTER 3500 CAB CHASSIS





Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2013 GMC ACADIA AWD SUV SAFEST 1% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2013 GMC ACADIA FWD SUV SAFEST 1% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2013 GMC ACADIA DENALI AWD SUV SAFEST 1% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28

2013 GMC ACADIA DENALI FWD SUV SAFEST 1% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4888 0.28






2013 GMC SIERRA 1500 PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? 5342 0.34

2013 GMC SIERRA 1500 PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? 5342 0.34

2013 GMC SIERRA 1500 PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD note (C) ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? 5249 0.35

2013 GMC SIERRA 1500 PU/EC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD note (C) ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? 5249 0.35

2013 GMC SIERRA 1500 PU/RC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD note (C) ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? 5249 0.35

2013 GMC SIERRA 1500 PU/RC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD note (C) ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? 5249 0.35

2013 GMC SIERRA 1500 HYBRID PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? 5342 0.34

2013 GMC SIERRA 1500 HYBRID PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? 5342 0.34

2013 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 4 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19

2013 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 4 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19

2013 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 2 2 4 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6455 0.22

2013 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/EC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 2 2 4 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6455 0.22

2013 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/RC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 2 2 2 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6455 0.22

2013 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/RC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 2 2 2 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6455 0.22

2013 GMC SIERRA 2500 (later release) PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2013 GMC SIERRA 2500 (later release) PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19







2013 GMC TERRAIN AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3936 0.48

2013 GMC TERRAIN FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3936 0.48





2013 GMC YUKON DENALI HYBRID 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5678 0.11

2013 GMC YUKON DENALI HYBRID RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5678 0.11



2013 GMC YUKON DENALI XL 2500 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 GMC YUKON DENALI XL 2500 RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 GMC YUKON HYBRID 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5678 0.11

2013 GMC YUKON HYBRID RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5678 0.11



2013 GMC YUKON XL 2500 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2013 GMC YUKON XL 2500 RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 HONDA ACCORD 2 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3311 0.96






2013 HONDA CROSSTOUR 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4096 0.45

2013 HONDA CROSSTOUR FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4096 0.45

2013 HONDA CR-V 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3463 0.58

2013 HONDA CR-V FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3463 0.58

2013 HONDA CR-Z 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [23% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 3 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2688 1.23


2013 HONDA FIT 5 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [33% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

4 4 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 2488 1.33

2013 HONDA FIT EV 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [29% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 2569 1.29

2013 HONDA INSIGHT 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [21% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2724 1.21

2013 HONDA ODYSSEY FWD VAN SAFEST 2% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4347 0.63

2013 HONDA PILOT 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4495 0.36

2013 HONDA PILOT FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4495 0.36

2013 HONDA RIDGELINE PU/CC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4496 0.48





2013 HYUNDAI AZERA 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3626 0.84



Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r





2013 HYUNDAI EQUUS 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4528 0.59


2013 HYUNDAI GENESIS 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3862 0.77

2013 HYUNDAI SANTA FE AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3877 0.49

2013 HYUNDAI SANTA FE FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3877 0.49

2013 HYUNDAI SANTA FE SPORT AWD SUV SAFEST 1% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3733 0.52

2013 HYUNDAI SANTA FE SPORT FWD SUV SAFEST 1% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3733 0.52

2013 HYUNDAI SONATA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3225 0.99

2013 HYUNDAI SONATA HYBRID 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3225 0.99

2013 HYUNDAI TUCSON AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3414 0.59

2013 HYUNDAI TUCSON FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3414 0.59

2013 HYUNDAI VELOSTER 2 DR FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [20% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

? ? ? ? ? GOOD note (C) ? GOOD MARGINAL 2739 1.20

2013 INFINITI EX37 STA. WGN. AWD

SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3970 0.47

2013 INFINITI EX37 STA. WGN. RWD


2013 INFINITI FX37 AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD ? GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 INFINITI FX37 RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD ? GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a



2013 INFINITI G37 2 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD note (C) MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE 3626 0.84

2013 INFINITI G37 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD note (C) MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE 3626 0.84

2013 INFINITI G37 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE 3626 0.84

2013 INFINITI G37 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE 3626 0.84


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2013 INFINITI G37 CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 INFINITI JX AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? 4453 0.37

2013 INFINITI JX FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? 4453 0.37

2013 INFINITI M35 HEV 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 4037 0.72

2013 INFINITI M37 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4037 0.72

2013 INFINITI M37 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4037 0.72

2013 INFINITI M56 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4037 0.72

2013 INFINITI M56 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 4037 0.72











2013 JEEP COMPASS 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 4 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3322 0.61

2013 JEEP COMPASS 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 4 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3322 0.61

2013 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 4701 0.32

2013 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 4701 0.32

2013 JEEP PATRIOT 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 3 5 3 NO GOOD MARGINAL GOOD GOOD POOR 3344 0.60

2013 JEEP PATRIOT 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 3 5 3 NO GOOD MARGINAL GOOD GOOD POOR 3344 0.60


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2013 JEEP WRANGLER 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD MARGINAL ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2013 KIA FORTE 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [14% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2864 1.14

2013 KIA FORTE 5 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [14% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 4 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 2864 1.14

2013 KIA FORTE KOUP 2 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a







2013 KIA SORENTO AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4017 0.46

2013 KIA SORENTO FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4017 0.46

2013 KIA SOUL FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [18% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 2787 1.18

2013 KIA SPORTAGE AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3370 0.60

2013 KIA SPORTAGE FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 4 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3370 0.60




2013 LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2013 LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER SPORT 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 LEXUS CT200H 5 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3229 0.99


2013 LEXUS ES350 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 3% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3575 0.86


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2013 LEXUS GS350 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3743 0.80

2013 LEXUS GS350 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3743 0.80

2013 LEXUS GS450H 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3743 0.80



2013 LEXUS IS250 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE POOR 3711 0.82

2013 LEXUS IS250 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE POOR 3711 0.82


2013 LEXUS IS350 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE POOR 3711 0.82

2013 LEXUS IS350 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE POOR 3711 0.82








2013 LEXUS RX350 AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4402 0.38

2013 LEXUS RX350 FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4402 0.38

2013 LEXUS RX450H AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4402 0.38

2013 LEXUS RX450H FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4402 0.38

2013 LINCOLN MKS 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4145 0.69

2013 LINCOLN MKS 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4145 0.69

2013 LINCOLN MKT AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4899 0.28


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2013 LINCOLN MKT FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4899 0.28

2013 LINCOLN MKX AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] 4 3 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4272 0.41

2013 LINCOLN MKX FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] 4 3 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4272 0.41










2013 MAZDA CX-5 AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3344 0.60

2013 MAZDA CX-5 FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3344 0.60





2013 MAZDA MAZDA3 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [12% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 5 3 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2913 1.12

2013 MAZDA MAZDA3 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [12% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 5 3 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2913 1.12


CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD note (C) ? GOOD POOR 3409 0.92

2013 MAZDA MAZDA6 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 3 4 5 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE 3280 0.97


2013 MERCEDES-BENZ C-CLASS 2 DR 4WD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in

bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3510 0.88

2013 MERCEDES-BENZ C-CLASS 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in

bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3510 0.88


71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3751 0.80




Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r







2013 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS 2 DR 4WD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3736 0.81

2013 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3736 0.81

2013 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3880 0.76

2013 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3880 0.76

2013 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS CABRIOLET CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS HYBRID 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3880 0.76

2013 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS HYBRID 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3880 0.76

2013 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS WAGON STA. WGN.

4WDSUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS WAGON STA. WGN.

RWDCAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2013 MERCEDES-BENZ GLK-CLASS 4 DR 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4157 0.43

2013 MERCEDES-BENZ GLK-CLASS 4 DR RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4157 0.43

2013 MERCEDES-BENZ ML-CLASS 4WD SUV SAFEST 1% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4754 0.31

2013 MERCEDES-BENZ ML-CLASS RWD SUV SAFEST 1% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4754 0.31



2013 MERCEDES-BENZ S-CLASS HYBRID 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a




Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r




2013 MERCEDES-BENZ SLS AMG CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2013 MERCEDES-BENZ SPRINTER 2500 CARGO VAN



2013 MERCEDES-BENZ SPRINTER 3500 CAB CHASSIS








2013 MINI COOPER COUPE 2 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [29% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 2564 1.29

2013 MINI COOPER HARDTOP 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [29% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 2564 1.29








2013 MINI COOPER S HARDTOP 3 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a








Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2013 MINI JCW COUNTRYMAN ALL4 5 HB AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 MINI JCW Coupe 2 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 MINI JCW HARDTOP 3 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 MINI JCW PACEMAN ALL4 3 HB AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a






2013 MITSUBISHI LANCER SPORTBACK 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [2% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 4 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3139 1.02

2013 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 3670 0.54

2013 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 3670 0.54





2013 NISSAN ALTIMA 2 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [3% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 5 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3115 1.03




2013 NISSAN CUBE FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [16% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2833 1.16





Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r




2013 NISSAN GT-R 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 NISSAN JUKE AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [2% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 3 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3146 1.02

2013 NISSAN JUKE FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [2% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 3 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3146 1.02

2013 NISSAN LEAF 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3258 0.98




2013 NISSAN MURANO CROSS CONV. AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2013 NISSAN NV200 FWD VAN VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2013 NISSAN NV3500 RWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 2%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 2 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 NISSAN NV3500 RWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 2%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 2 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 NISSAN PATHFINDER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? 4453 0.37

2013 NISSAN PATHFINDER FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? 4453 0.37


2013 NISSAN ROGUE AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL 4101 0.45

2013 NISSAN ROGUE FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL 4101 0.45

2013 NISSAN SENTRA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [14% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 2862 1.14






Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r





















2013 PORSCHE CAYENNE AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 PORSCHE CAYENNE DIESEL AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2013 PORSCHE CAYENNE S AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 PORSCHE CAYENNE S HYBRID AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a




Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r






2013 PORSCHE PANAMERA S 5 HB AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 PORSCHE PANAMERA S HYBRID 5 HB AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a





2013 RAM 2500 PU/CC 2WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6580 0.21

2013 RAM 2500 PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6580 0.21





2013 RAM 1500 CREW PU/CC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD ? GOOD MARGINAL ? 5441 0.33

2013 RAM 1500 CREW PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 NO GOOD ? GOOD MARGINAL ? 5441 0.33

2013 RAM 1500 QUAD PU/EC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD ? GOOD MARGINAL ? 5331 0.34

2013 RAM 1500 QUAD PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 NO GOOD ? GOOD MARGINAL ? 5331 0.34







Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r





2013 SMART CABRIO ED CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a




2013 SUBARU BRZ 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [18% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2787 1.18

2013 SUBARU FORESTER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3254 0.62

2013 SUBARU IMPREZA 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [12% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2926 1.12


CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [12% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2926 1.12




2013 SUBARU LEGACY 4 DR AWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3428 0.91

2013 SUBARU OUTBACK AWD CAR SAFEST 3% 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3428 0.91

2013 SUBARU TRIBECA AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4194 0.43

2013 SUBARU XV CROSSTREK STA. WGN. AWD

CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [9% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2985 1.09

2013 SUZUKI EQUATOR PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 4265 0.52

2013 SUZUKI EQUATOR PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 4265 0.52

2013 SUZUKI EQUATOR PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD note (C) ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 4265 0.52

2013 SUZUKI EQUATOR PU/EC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD note (C) ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 4265 0.52

2013 SUZUKI GRAND VITARA AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ? 3639 0.54

2013 SUZUKI GRAND VITARA RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ? 3639 0.54

2013 SUZUKI KIZASHI 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD 3318 0.95

2013 SUZUKI KIZASHI 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD 3318 0.95


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2013 SUZUKI SX4 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [19% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 3 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? ? 2765 1.19

2013 SUZUKI SX4 5 HB AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [19% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 3 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? ? 2765 1.19

2013 SUZUKI SX4 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [19% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 3 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? ? 2765 1.19

2013 TESLA MODEL S 5 HB RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 5 5 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 4321 0.64

2013 TOYOTA 4RUNNER 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4759 0.31

2013 TOYOTA 4RUNNER 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4759 0.31

2013 TOYOTA AVALON 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3575 0.86

2013 TOYOTA AVALON HYBRID 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3575 0.86

2013 TOYOTA CAMRY 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3210 1.00

2013 TOYOTA CAMRY HV 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3210 1.00

2013 TOYOTA COROLLA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [20% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2754 1.20

2013 TOYOTA FJ CRUISER 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 4338 0.40


2013 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4374 0.39

2013 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4374 0.39

2013 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER HV AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4374 0.39


2013 TOYOTA MATRIX STA. WGN. AWD

CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? ? n/a weight n/a

2013 TOYOTA MATRIX STA. WGN. FWD


2013 TOYOTA PRIUS 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [5% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3082 1.05



2013 TOYOTA PRIUS PLUG-IN HYBRID 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [1% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3172 1.01


CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3315 0.96

2013 TOYOTA RAV4 AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3553 0.56


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2013 TOYOTA RAV4 FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3553 0.56

2013 TOYOTA RAV4 (later release) AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3560 0.56

2013 TOYOTA RAV4 (later release) FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3560 0.56

2013 TOYOTA RAV4 EV FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3516 0.57

2013 TOYOTA SCION FR-S 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [18% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2787 1.18


2013 TOYOTA SCION IQ EV 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [53% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 2130 1.53

2013 TOYOTA SCION TC 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [3% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3122 1.03


CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [5% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3078 1.05

2013 TOYOTA SCION XD 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [25% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2641 1.25



2013 TOYOTA SIENNA AWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4684 0.55

2013 TOYOTA SIENNA FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4684 0.55







2013 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/CC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 5581 0.31

2013 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 5581 0.31




Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r





2013 TOYOTA VENZA AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3956 0.48

2013 TOYOTA VENZA FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3956 0.48

2013 TOYOTA YARIS 3 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [38% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]


2013 TOYOTA YARIS 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [38% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 2396 1.38


71%] [7% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3040 1.07


2013 VOLKSWAGEN CC 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3419 0.92

2013 VOLKSWAGEN CC 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3419 0.92



to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3042 1.07

2013 VOLKSWAGEN GOLF 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [7% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due

to low weight] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3042 1.07



2013 VOLKSWAGEN GOLF R 2 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [7% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due


2013 VOLKSWAGEN GOLF R 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [7% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due


2013 VOLKSWAGEN GTI 2 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [7% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due




2013 VOLKSWAGEN JETTA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom


2013 VOLKSWAGEN JETTA HEV 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom



FWDCAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3234 0.99


2013 VOLKSWAGEN ROUTAN FWD VAN VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a




Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r





2013 VOLKSWAGEN TIGUAN (later release) AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom


2013 VOLKSWAGEN TIGUAN (later release) FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom


2013 VOLKSWAGEN TOUAREG AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4809 0.30

2013 VOLKSWAGEN TOUAREG HYBRID AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4809 0.30

2013 VOLVO C30 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [1% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3187 1.01

2013 VOLVO C70 CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a













2012 ACURA MDX 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4565 0.35

2012 ACURA RDX 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 3911 0.49

2012 ACURA RDX FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 3911 0.49

2012 ACURA RL 4 DR 4WD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 4051 0.71



2012 ACURA TL (later release) 4 DR 4WD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3984 0.73


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2012 ACURA TL (later release) 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD 3984 0.73

2012 ACURA TSX 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3634 0.84



2012 ACURA TSX V6 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3634 0.84

2012 ACURA ZDX 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD ? GOOD ? ? 4431 0.38



2012 AUDI A4 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3681 0.83

2012 AUDI A4 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3681 0.83

2012 AUDI A4 AVANT STA. WGN. AWD

CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3681 0.83
















Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r









2012 BENTLEY CONTINENTAL SUPERSPORTS 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 BENTLEY CONTINENTAL SUPERSPORTS CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a









2012 BMW 328I STA. WGN. RWD









2012 BMW 335IS HP 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3516 0.88


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2012 BMW 335IS HP CONV. RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD MARGINAL ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2012 BMW 528XI 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3945 0.74























Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2012 BMW ACTIVE HYBRID 750I 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a







2012 BMW X5 M AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 BMW X5 XDRIVE35D AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 BMW X5 XDRIVE35I AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 BMW X5 XDRIVE50I AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a




2012 BMW Z4 SDRIVE28I 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2012 BMW Z4 SDRIVE35IS 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 BUICK ENCLAVE AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4847 0.29

2012 BUICK ENCLAVE FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4847 0.29



2012 BUICK LACROSSE EASSIST 4 DR AWD CAR SAFEST 2% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4255 0.66

2012 BUICK LACROSSE EASSIST 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 2% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4255 0.66

2012 BUICK REGAL 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3676 0.83


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2012 BUICK REGAL 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3676 0.83

2012 BUICK REGAL EASSIST 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3676 0.83

2012 BUICK VERANO 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [2% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3143 1.02



2012 CADILLAC CTS 4 DR AWD CAR SAFEST 2% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4074 0.71

2012 CADILLAC CTS 4 DR RWD CAR SAFEST 2% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4074 0.71












2012 CADILLAC SRX AWD SUV SAFEST 1% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4574 0.35

2012 CADILLAC SRX FWD SUV SAFEST 1% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4574 0.35








Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2012 CHEVROLET CHEVROLET CAPRICE PPV 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 CHEVROLET COLORADO PU/CC AWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-moderate overlap rating in bottom 2%] [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO ACCEPTABLE POOR MARGINAL MARGINAL ? 3807 0.63

2012 CHEVROLET COLORADO PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-moderate overlap rating in bottom 2%] [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO ACCEPTABLE POOR MARGINAL MARGINAL ? 3807 0.63

2012 CHEVROLET COLORADO PU/EC AWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 CHEVROLET COLORADO PU/EC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 CHEVROLET COLORADO PU/RC AWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 CHEVROLET COLORADO PU/RC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a








2012 CHEVROLET EXPRESS CARGO G13405 RWD VAN VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a





2012 CHEVROLET EXPRESS CARGO H13405 AWD VAN VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a






Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r




2012 CHEVROLET IMPALA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 3588 0.86

2012 CHEVROLET MALIBU 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3408 0.92









2012 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 4 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19

2012 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 4 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19

2012 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/EC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/EC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/RC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/RC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 (later release) PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19

2012 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 (later release) PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19







Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r












2012 CHEVROLET TAHOE HYBRID 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5678 0.11

2012 CHEVROLET TAHOE HYBRID RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5678 0.11

2012 CHEVROLET TRAVERSE AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4847 0.29

2012 CHEVROLET TRAVERSE FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4847 0.29


2012 CHEVROLET VOLT (later release) 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3753 0.80

2012 CHEVROLET VOLT (latest release) 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3753 0.80



2012 CHRYSLER 300 4 DR AWD CAR SAFEST 2% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4299 0.64

2012 CHRYSLER 300 4 DR RWD CAR SAFEST 2% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4299 0.64

2012 CHRYSLER TOWN AND COUNTRY FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4605 0.57

2012 CODA CODA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 2 5 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3672 0.83

2012 CODA CODA (later release) 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 3672 0.83



Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2012 DODGE CALIBER 4 DR FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [4% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

3 4 3 4 NO GOOD MARGINAL GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3095 1.04

2012 DODGE CARGO VAN FWD VAN VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 DODGE CHALLENGER 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 DODGE CHARGER 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4242 0.66

2012 DODGE CHARGER 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4242 0.66



2012 DODGE GRAND CARAVAN FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4605 0.57

2012 DODGE JOURNEY 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4200 0.42

2012 DODGE JOURNEY FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4200 0.42

2012 FIAT 500 3 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [36% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]


2012 FIAT 500 (later release) 3 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [36% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]


2012 FIAT 500 CABRIO CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2012 FORD E-150 WAGON RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a






2012 FORD ESCAPE 4x2 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 3 3 3 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 3491 0.57


2012 FORD ESCAPE HEV 4x2 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 3 3 3 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 3491 0.57



Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r









2012 FORD EXPLORER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4763 0.31

2012 FORD EXPLORER FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4763 0.31




















Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r









2012 FORD FUSION 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 3 4 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3764 0.80

2012 FORD FUSION 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 3 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3764 0.80

2012 FORD FUSION HYBRID 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 3 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3720 0.81



2012 FORD TAURUS 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4125 0.69

2012 FORD TAURUS 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4125 0.69

2012 FORD TRANSIT CONNECT FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 2 3 2 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3472 0.90





2012 FREIGHTLINER SPRINTER 3500 CAB CHASSIS




2012 GMC ACADIA AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4847 0.29

2012 GMC ACADIA FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4847 0.29

2012 GMC CANYON PU/CC AWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-moderate overlap rating in bottom 2%] [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO ACCEPTABLE POOR ? MARGINAL ? 3807 0.63

2012 GMC CANYON PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-moderate overlap rating in bottom 2%] [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO ACCEPTABLE POOR ? MARGINAL ? 3807 0.63

2012 GMC CANYON PU/EC AWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2012 GMC CANYON PU/EC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 GMC CANYON PU/RC AWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 GMC CANYON PU/RC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 GMC SAVANA CARGO G13405 RWD VAN VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a





2012 GMC SAVANA CARGO H13405 AWD VAN VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a












2012 GMC SIERRA 1500 HYBRID PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? 5342 0.34

2012 GMC SIERRA 1500 HYBRID PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? 5342 0.34

2012 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 4 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19

2012 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 4 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2012 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/EC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/EC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/RC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/RC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 GMC SIERRA 2500 (later release) PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19

2012 GMC SIERRA 2500 (later release) PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 6800 0.19















2012 GMC YUKON DENALI XL 2500 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 GMC YUKON DENALI XL 2500 RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 GMC YUKON HYBRID 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5678 0.11

2012 GMC YUKON HYBRID RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 5 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5678 0.11


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r





2012 GMC YUKON XL 2500 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 GMC YUKON XL 2500 RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 HONDA ACCORD 2 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 HONDA ACCORD 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 3% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3265 0.97

2012 HONDA ACCORD V6 2 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 HONDA ACCORD V6 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 3% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3265 0.97

2012 HONDA CIVIC 2 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [23% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 4 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 2688 1.23

2012 HONDA CIVIC 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [16% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2838 1.16

2012 HONDA CIVIC CNG 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [23% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2678 1.23

2012 HONDA CIVIC HYBRID 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [16% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2838 1.16

2012 HONDA CROSSTOUR 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 4026 0.46

2012 HONDA CROSSTOUR FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 4026 0.46

2012 HONDA CR-V 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3463 0.58

2012 HONDA CR-V FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3463 0.58

2012 HONDA CR-Z 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [23% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 3 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2688 1.23


2012 HONDA FIT 5 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [33% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]


2012 HONDA INSIGHT 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [21% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2724 1.21


2012 HONDA PILOT 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4495 0.36

2012 HONDA PILOT FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4495 0.36

2012 HONDA RIDGELINE PU/CC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4496 0.48


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r





2012 HYUNDAI ACCENT 5 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [31% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]


2012 HYUNDAI AZERA 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3626 0.84



2012 HYUNDAI ELANTRA (later release) 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [17% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2798 1.17

2012 HYUNDAI ELANTRA TOURING 5 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a




2012 HYUNDAI SANTA FE AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] 3 4 2 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3868 0.49

2012 HYUNDAI SANTA FE FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] 3 4 2 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3868 0.49



2012 HYUNDAI TUCSON AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3414 0.59

2012 HYUNDAI TUCSON FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3414 0.59

2012 HYUNDAI VELOSTER 2 DR FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [20% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]


2012 HYUNDAI VERACRUZ AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 HYUNDAI VERACRUZ FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a









Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r











2012 INFINITI M35 HEV 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 4039 0.71

2012 INFINITI M37 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4039 0.71

2012 INFINITI M37 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4039 0.71


2012 INFINITI M56 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4039 0.71








2012 JEEP COMPASS 2WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2012 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4701 0.32

2012 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4701 0.32


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2012 JEEP LIBERTY 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 3 2 4 3 NO GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 4160 0.43

2012 JEEP LIBERTY 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 3 2 4 3 NO GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 4160 0.43

2012 JEEP PATRIOT 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD MARGINAL GOOD GOOD POOR 3393 0.59


2012 JEEP WRANGLER 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD POOR MARGINAL ? MARGINAL n/a weight n/a



2012 KIA FORTE 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [14% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2864 1.14




4 4 5 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? GOOD MARGINAL 2559 1.29


4 4 5 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? GOOD MARGINAL 2559 1.29

2012 KIA SEDONA FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 2%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR ? 4449 0.61

2012 KIA SORENTO AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4017 0.46

2012 KIA SORENTO FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4017 0.46


2012 KIA SPORTAGE AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3370 0.60

2012 KIA SPORTAGE FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] 4 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3370 0.60




2012 LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a




Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r





2012 LEXUS ES350 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] 3 4 2 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL GOOD POOR 3632 0.84

2012 LEXUS GS350 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL GOOD POOR 3601 0.85

2012 LEXUS GS350 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL GOOD POOR 3601 0.85

2012 LEXUS GS450H 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL GOOD POOR 3601 0.85


2012 LEXUS HS250H 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ? 3650 0.84

2012 LEXUS IS F 4DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD ? GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 LEXUS IS250 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE POOR 3580 0.86

2012 LEXUS IS250 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE POOR 3580 0.86





2012 LEXUS LFA 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a










Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r





2012 LINCOLN MKS 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4172 0.68

2012 LINCOLN MKS 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4172 0.68



2012 LINCOLN MKX AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] 4 3 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4272 0.41

2012 LINCOLN MKX FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] 4 3 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4272 0.41

2012 LINCOLN MKZ 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 3 4 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3764 0.80

2012 LINCOLN MKZ 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 3 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3764 0.80

2012 LINCOLN MKZ HEV 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 3 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3720 0.81







2012 MAYBACH MAYBACH 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 MAZDA CX-7 AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD ? MARGINAL ? 3896 0.49

2012 MAZDA CX-7 FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD ? MARGINAL ? 3896 0.49

2012 MAZDA CX-9 AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL MARGINAL POOR 4463 0.37

2012 MAZDA CX-9 FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL MARGINAL POOR 4463 0.37






CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD note (C) ? GOOD POOR 3409 0.92


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2012 MAZDA MAZDA6 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 3 4 5 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE 3280 0.97


2012 MERCEDES-BENZ B-CLASS 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 MERCEDES-BENZ C-CLASS 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3733 0.81

2012 MERCEDES-BENZ C-CLASS 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3733 0.81

2012 MERCEDES-BENZ CL-CLASS 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2012 MERCEDES-BENZ CLS-CLASS 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2012 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3736 0.81




2012 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS CABRIOLET 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2012 MERCEDES-BENZ GL-CLASS AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 MERCEDES-BENZ GL-CLASS RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 MERCEDES-BENZ GLK-CLASS 4 DR AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4157 0.43


2012 MERCEDES-BENZ ML-CLASS AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4722 0.31

2012 MERCEDES-BENZ R-CLASS AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 MERCEDES-BENZ R-CLASS RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 MERCEDES-BENZ S-CLASS 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r





2012 MERCEDES-BENZ SLS AMG 2 DR OR C

RWDCAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a





2012 MERCEDES-BENZ SPRINTER 3500 CAB CHASSIS








2012 MINI COOPER HARDTOP 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [29% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 2564 1.29












2012 MINI JCW COUPE 2 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a




Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2012 MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE 3 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE SPYDER CONV. FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 MITSUBISHI GALANT 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ? 3438 0.91




2012 MITSUBISHI LANCER 5 HB AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [2% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3139 1.02

2012 MITSUBISHI LANCER 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [2% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3139 1.02


2012 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 3670 0.54

2012 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 3670 0.54





2012 NISSAN ALTIMA 2 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD note (C) ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 3196 1.00

2012 NISSAN ALTIMA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [4% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 3111 1.04









Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r





2012 NISSAN JUKE AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [2% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 3 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3146 1.02

2012 NISSAN JUKE FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [2% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 3 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3146 1.02

2012 NISSAN LEAF 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3351 0.94




2012 NISSAN MURANO CROSS CONV. AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a





2012 NISSAN PATHFINDER 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL MARGINAL ? 4721 0.31

2012 NISSAN PATHFINDER RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL MARGINAL ? 4721 0.31




2012 NISSAN SENTRA 4 DR FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [12% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

4 3 3 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 2917 1.12








Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2012 NISSAN VERSA 5 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [30% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

? 3 ? 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? ACCEPTABLE ? 2539 1.30




2012 PORSCHE 911 CARRERA CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2012 PORSCHE 911 CARRERA 4 CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2012 PORSCHE 911 CARRERA 4S CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2012 PORSCHE 911 CARRERA S CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 PORSCHE 911 GTS 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 PORSCHE 911 GTS CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 PORSCHE 911 GTS 4 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 PORSCHE 911 GTS 4 CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 PORSCHE 911 TARGA 4 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 PORSCHE 911 TARGA 4S 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2012 PORSCHE 911 TURBO CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2012 PORSCHE 911 TURBO S CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a





Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r








2012 PORSCHE CAYMAN R 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a





2012 PORSCHE PANAMERA S 5 HB RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 PORSCHE PANAMERA S HYBRID 5 HB AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2012 RAM 1500 PU/RC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 4 3 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5331 0.34

2012 RAM 1500 PU/RC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 3 4 3 3 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD MARGINAL ? 5331 0.34







2012 RAM 1500 CREW PU/CC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD MARGINAL GOOD MARGINAL ? 5441 0.33

2012 RAM 1500 CREW PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 NO GOOD MARGINAL GOOD MARGINAL ? 5441 0.33


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2012 RAM 1500 QUAD PU/EC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD MARGINAL ? 5331 0.34

2012 RAM 1500 QUAD PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD MARGINAL ? 5331 0.34







2012 SAAB 9-3 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 SAAB 9-3 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 SAAB 9-3 CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 SAAB 9-3 STA. WGN. AWD


2012 SAAB 9-3 STA. WGN. FWD


2012 SAAB 9-5 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3832 0.78

2012 SAAB 9-5 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3832 0.78

2012 SAAB 9-5 STA. WGN. AWD

CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3832 0.78

2012 SAAB 9-4X AWD SUV SAFEST 1% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4574 0.35

2012 SAAB 9-4X FWD SUV SAFEST 1% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4574 0.35

2012 SMART FORTWO 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [73% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 1828 1.73

2012 SMART FORTWO CABRIOLET 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 SMART FORTWO ED 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [73% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 1828 1.73

2012 SMART FORTWO ED CABRIOLET 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2012 SUBARU IMPREZA 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [13% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 4 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2902 1.13


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r




CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [13% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 4 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2902 1.13




2012 SUBARU LEGACY 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] ? 4 ? 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3489 0.89

2012 SUBARU OUTBACK AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3489 0.89










2012 SUZUKI SX4 4 DR FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [19% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

4 4 3 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL MARGINAL ? 2765 1.19

2012 SUZUKI SX4 5 HB AWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [19% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]


2012 SUZUKI SX4 5 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [19% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]


2012 TOYOTA 4RUNNER 2WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 4759 0.31

2012 TOYOTA 4RUNNER 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 4759 0.31

2012 TOYOTA AVALON 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3583 0.86

2012 TOYOTA CAMRY 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3210 1.00

2012 TOYOTA CAMRY HV 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3210 1.00

2012 TOYOTA COROLLA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [20% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2754 1.20



Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r













2012 TOYOTA PRIUS PLUG-IN 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [1% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3172 1.01


CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3274 0.97

2012 TOYOTA RAV4 AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3540 0.56

2012 TOYOTA RAV4 FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3540 0.56





2012 TOYOTA SCION XD 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [25% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2641 1.25







2012 TOYOTA TACOMA PU/EC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD MARGINAL ? 3922 0.60

2012 TOYOTA TACOMA PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD MARGINAL ? 3922 0.60


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2012 TOYOTA TACOMA PU/RC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD MARGINAL ? 3922 0.60

2012 TOYOTA TACOMA PU/RC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD MARGINAL ? 3922 0.60

2012 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/CC 2WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 3 5 3 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 5784 0.28

2012 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] 4 3 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 5784 0.28







2012 TOYOTA YARIS 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [38% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD note (C) GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 2401 1.38

2012 TOYOTA YARIS 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 4180 0.68

2012 TOYOTA YARIS 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [38% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 2396 1.38

2012 VOLKSWAGEN BEETLE 2 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [6% higher driver fatality

risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD ? GOOD GOOD ? 3049 1.06













passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2963 1.10

2012 VOLKSWAGEN JETTA STA. WGN.

FWDCAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2012 VOLKSWAGEN PASSAT 4 DR FWD CAR SAFEST 4% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3203 1.00


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2012 VOLKSWAGEN ROUTAN FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4594 0.57

2012 VOLKSWAGEN TIGUAN AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3665 0.54

2012 VOLKSWAGEN TIGUAN FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3665 0.54


2012 VOLVO C30 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [1% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3187 1.01






2012 VOLVO XC60 AWD SUV SAFEST 1% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4180 0.43

2012 VOLVO XC60 FWD SUV SAFEST 1% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4180 0.43







2011 ACURA MDX AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 5 4 5 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? 4565 0.35

2011 ACURA RDX AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 3911 0.49

2011 ACURA RDX FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 3911 0.49

2011 ACURA RL 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 4051 0.71

2011 ACURA TL 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? GOOD n/a weight n/a

2011 ACURA TL 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? GOOD 3730 0.81

2011 ACURA TSX 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? MARGINAL 3364 0.94


CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? MARGINAL n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2011 ACURA ZDX AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 NO GOOD ? ACCEPTABLE ? ? 4431 0.38



2011 AUDI A4 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3681 0.83

2011 AUDI A4 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3681 0.83



2011 AUDI A5 CABRIOLET CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 AUDI A5 CABRIOLET CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 AUDI A5 COUPE 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 AUDI A6 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3855 0.77

2011 AUDI A6 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3855 0.77






2011 AUDI R8 COUPE 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2011 AUDI S4 AVANT STA. WGN. AWD


2011 AUDI S5 CABRIOLET CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 AUDI S5 CABRIOLET CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 AUDI S5 COUPE 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2011 AUDI S6 AVANT STA. WGN. AWD



Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2011 AUDI TT COUPE 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a





2011 BENTLEY CONTINENTAL SUPERSPORTS 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2011 BENTLEY SUPERSPORTS CONVERTIBLE CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a





2011 BMW 328I 2 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3398 0.92

2011 BMW 328I 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3398 0.92

2011 BMW 328I 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3398 0.92

2011 BMW 328I 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3398 0.92

2011 BMW 328I CONV. AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD MARGINAL ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2011 BMW 328I STA. WGN. AWD

CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3398 0.92

2011 BMW 328I STA. WGN. RWD


2011 BMW 328I XDRIVE 2 DR 4WD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD note (C) GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3398 0.92

2011 BMW 328I XDRIVE 4 DR 4WD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3398 0.92

2011 BMW 328I XDRIVE STA. WGN. 4WD

CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3398 0.92

2011 BMW 335 IS 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3398 0.92


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2011 BMW 335 IS CONV. RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD MARGINAL ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 BMW 335D 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3398 0.92

2011 BMW 335I 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3398 0.92

2011 BMW 335I 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3398 0.92


2011 BMW 335I XDRIVE 2 DR 4WD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD note (C) GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3398 0.92

2011 BMW 335I XDRIVE 4 DR 4WD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3398 0.92


2011 BMW 535I 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3945 0.74



2011 BMW 535I XDRIVE 4 DR 4WD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3945 0.74

2011 BMW 535I XDRIVE GT 4 DR 4WD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3945 0.74



2011 BMW 550I XDRIVE 4 DR 4WD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3945 0.74

2011 BMW 550I XDRIVE GT 4 DR 4WD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3945 0.74




2011 BMW 750I XDRIVE 4 DR 4WD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 BMW 750LI SEDAN 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 BMW 750LI XDRIVE 4 DR 4WD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2011 BMW ACTIVE HYBRID 750I 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2011 BMW ACTIVE HYBRID X6 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a




2011 BMW X3 XDRIVE28I 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 BMW X3 XDRIVE35I 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 BMW X5 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? 5090 0.24

2011 BMW X5 XDRIVE35D 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? 5090 0.24

2011 BMW X5 XDRIVE35I 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? 5090 0.24

2011 BMW X5 XDRIVE50I 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? 5090 0.24

2011 BMW X6 M 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 BMW X6 XDRIVE35I 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 BMW X6 XDRIVE50I 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2011 BMW Z4 SDRIVE35IS 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 BUICK ENCLAVE AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4847 0.29

2011 BUICK ENCLAVE FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4847 0.29



2011 BUICK LUCERNE 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] 3 5 2 5 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? ? 3751 0.80

2011 BUICK LUCERNE (later release) 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] 4 5 2 5 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? ? 3751 0.80


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2011 BUICK REGAL 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3614 0.85

2011 BUICK REGAL 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3614 0.85



2011 CADILLAC CTS 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3939 0.74

2011 CADILLAC CTS 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3939 0.74


CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3939 0.74


CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3939 0.74

2011 CADILLAC DTS 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? ? 3772 0.80



2011 CADILLAC ESCALADE ESV AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5488 0.15




2011 CADILLAC SRX AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4505 0.36

2011 CADILLAC SRX FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4505 0.36

2011 CADILLAC STS 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 2%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE POOR ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 CADILLAC STS 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 2%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE POOR ? ? n/a weight n/a



2011 CHEVROLET AVEO 4 DR FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-moderate overlap rating in bottom 2%] [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [29% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

? ? ? ? NO ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL MARGINAL MARGINAL ? 2569 1.29

2011 CHEVROLET AVEO4 5 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-moderate overlap rating in bottom 2%] [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [29% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

? ? ? 4 NO ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL MARGINAL MARGINAL ? 2569 1.29

2011 CHEVROLET CAMARO 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3728 0.81


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2011 CHEVROLET CAMARO CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2011 CHEVROLET COLORADO PU/CC AWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-moderate overlap rating in bottom 2%] [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO ACCEPTABLE POOR MARGINAL MARGINAL ? 3807 0.63

2011 CHEVROLET COLORADO PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-moderate overlap rating in bottom 2%] [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO ACCEPTABLE POOR MARGINAL MARGINAL ? 3807 0.63

2011 CHEVROLET COLORADO PU/EC AWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 CHEVROLET COLORADO PU/EC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 CHEVROLET COLORADO PU/RC AWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 CHEVROLET COLORADO PU/RC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a








2011 CHEVROLET EXPRESS CARGO 1500 AWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 CHEVROLET EXPRESS CARGO 1500 RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a








Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r




2011 CHEVROLET HHR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [2% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? ? 3155 1.02

2011 CHEVROLET HHR PANEL FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [2% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? ? 3155 1.02

2011 CHEVROLET IMPALA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 3635 0.84

2011 CHEVROLET MALIBU 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3408 0.92









2011 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/CC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/EC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/EC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/RC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 2500 PU/RC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a




2011 CHEVROLET SUBURBAN 1500 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5687 0.11

2011 CHEVROLET SUBURBAN 1500 RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5687 0.11


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r







2011 CHEVROLET TAHOE HYBRID 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5678 0.11

2011 CHEVROLET TAHOE HYBRID RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 5 ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5678 0.11

2011 CHEVROLET TRAVERSE AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4847 0.29

2011 CHEVROLET TRAVERSE FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4847 0.29


2011 CHRYSLER 200 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3275 0.97

2011 CHRYSLER 200 CONVERTIBLE FWD


2011 CHRYSLER 300 4 DR 4WD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4054 0.71

2011 CHRYSLER 300 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4054 0.71

2011 CHRYSLER TOWN AND COUNTRY FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? POOR 4456 0.61

2011 DODGE AVENGER 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3275 0.97

2011 DODGE CALIBER 5 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [4% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

3 4 3 4 NO GOOD MARGINAL GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3095 1.04

2011 DODGE CARGO VAN FWD VAN VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 DODGE CHALLENGER 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3834 0.78

2011 DODGE CHARGER 4 DR 4WD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4054 0.71

2011 DODGE CHARGER 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4054 0.71

2011 DODGE DAKOTA PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD ? ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? 4321 0.51

2011 DODGE DAKOTA PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD ? ACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ? 4321 0.51

2011 DODGE DAKOTA PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-moderate overlap rating in bottom 2%][IIHS side impact rating unknown] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO ACCEPTABLE ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 DODGE DAKOTA PU/EC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-moderate overlap rating in bottom 2%][IIHS side impact rating unknown] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO ACCEPTABLE ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2011 DODGE DURANGO 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 5059 0.24

2011 DODGE DURANGO RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 5059 0.24

2011 DODGE GRAND CARAVAN FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? POOR 4456 0.61

2011 DODGE JOURNEY 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4318 0.40

2011 DODGE JOURNEY FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4318 0.40

2011 DODGE NITRO 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 4245 0.41

2011 DODGE NITRO RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 4245 0.41

2011 FORD CROWN VICTORIA 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD MARGINAL MARGINAL ? ? 4339 0.63

2011 FORD E-150 VAN RWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 FORD E-150 WAGON RWD VAN VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a










2011 FORD EXPEDITION 4x2 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5515 0.15

2011 FORD EXPEDITION 4x4 SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5515 0.15

2011 FORD EXPLORER AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4661 0.33

2011 FORD EXPLORER FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4661 0.33



Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r








2011 FORD F-250 PU/CC 4x2 PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 FORD F-250 PU/CC 4x4 PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 FORD F-250 PU/EC 4x2 PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 FORD F-250 PU/EC 4x4 PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 FORD F-250 PU/RC 4x2 PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 FORD F-250 PU/RC 4x4 PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a











2011 FORD FOCUS 2 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 FORD FOCUS 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [24% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? ? 2659 1.24

2011 FORD FUSION 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 3 4 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3764 0.80


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2011 FORD FUSION 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 3 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3764 0.80

2011 FORD FUSION HYBRID 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 3 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3720 0.81

2011 FORD MUSTANG 2 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a


2011 FORD RANGER PU/EC 4x2 PUNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-moderate overlap rating in bottom 2%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%]

2 2 3 3 NO ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? ACCEPTABLE ? 3964 0.59

2011 FORD RANGER PU/EC 4x4 PUNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-moderate overlap rating in bottom 2%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%]

2 2 3 3 NO ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? ACCEPTABLE ? 3964 0.59

2011 FORD RANGER PU/RC 4x2 PUNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-moderate overlap rating in bottom 2%][IIHS side impact rating unknown] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%]

2 2 3 3 NO ACCEPTABLE ? ? ? ? 3964 0.59

2011 FORD TAURUS 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4125 0.69

2011 FORD TAURUS 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4125 0.69

2011 FORD TRANSIT CONNECT FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 FREIGHTLINER SPRINTER 2500 RWD TRUCK VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 FREIGHTLINER SPRINTER 2500 CARGO VAN RWD TRUCK VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 FREIGHTLINER SPRINTER 2500 PASSENGER VAN RWD TRUCK NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 1%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 1 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 FREIGHTLINER SPRINTER 3500 CAB CHASSIS RWD TRUCK VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 FREIGHTLINER SPRINTER 3500 CARGO VAN RWD TRUCK VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 GMC ACADIA AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4847 0.29

2011 GMC ACADIA FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4847 0.29

2011 GMC CANYON PU/CC AWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-moderate overlap rating in bottom 2%] [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO ACCEPTABLE POOR ? MARGINAL ? 3807 0.63

2011 GMC CANYON PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-moderate overlap rating in bottom 2%] [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO ACCEPTABLE POOR ? MARGINAL ? 3807 0.63

2011 GMC CANYON PU/EC AWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 GMC CANYON PU/EC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 GMC CANYON PU/RC AWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 GMC CANYON PU/RC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 GMC SAVANA CARGO 1500 AWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2011 GMC SAVANA CARGO 1500 RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 GMC SAVANA CARGO 3500 RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a












2011 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/CC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/EC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/EC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/RC 4WD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 GMC SIERRA 2500 PU/RC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a







Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r





2011 GMC YUKON HYBRID 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? 5 ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5678 0.11

2011 GMC YUKON HYBRID RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? 5 ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5678 0.11

2011 HONDA ACCORD 2 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3273 0.97

2011 HONDA ACCORD 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] 5 5 5 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3265 0.97

2011 HONDA ACCORD CROSSTOUR AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 4026 0.46

2011 HONDA ACCORD CROSSTOUR FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 4026 0.46

2011 HONDA CIVIC 2 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [23% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? ? 2692 1.23

2011 HONDA CIVIC 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [22% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 3 4 2 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2708 1.22

2011 HONDA CIVIC CNG 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [22% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 3 4 2 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2708 1.22

2011 HONDA CIVIC HYBRID 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [22% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 3 4 2 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2708 1.22

2011 HONDA CR-V AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 3498 0.57

2011 HONDA CR-V FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 3498 0.57

2011 HONDA CR-Z 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [24% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 3 3 3 5 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 2658 1.24

2011 HONDA ELEMENT AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3633 0.54

2011 HONDA ELEMENT FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3633 0.54


2011 HONDA FIT 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [29% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE POOR 2569 1.29

2011 HONDA INSIGHT 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [22% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 2700 1.22


2011 HONDA PILOT AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL POOR 4495 0.36

2011 HONDA PILOT FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL POOR 4495 0.36

2011 HONDA RIDGELINE PU/CC AWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? 4473 0.48


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2011 HYUNDAI ACCENT 3 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-moderate overlap rating in bottom 2%][IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [29% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

? ? ? 4 NO ACCEPTABLE note (C) ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 2558 1.29

2011 HYUNDAI ACCENT 4 DR FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-moderate overlap rating in bottom 2%] [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [29% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

? ? ? 4 NO ACCEPTABLE POOR ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 2558 1.29

2011 HYUNDAI AZERA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 HYUNDAI ELANTRA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [20% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2748 1.20

2011 HYUNDAI ELANTRA TOURING STA. WGN. FWD





2011 HYUNDAI SANTA FE 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4008 0.46

2011 HYUNDAI SANTA FE FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4008 0.46


2011 HYUNDAI SONATA (later release) 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3249 0.98

2011 HYUNDAI SONATA (latest release) 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3225 0.99


2011 HYUNDAI TUCSON 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3359 0.60

2011 HYUNDAI TUCSON FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3359 0.60

2011 HYUNDAI VERACRUZ 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 HYUNDAI VERACRUZ FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a










Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r








2011 INFINITI M37 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4039 0.71


2011 INFINITI M56 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4039 0.71


2011 JAGUAR XJ 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 JAGUAR XK CONVERTIBLE CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 JAGUAR XK COUPE 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2011 JEEP COMPASS FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3082 0.66

2011 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4701 0.32

2011 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 4 4 5 3 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4701 0.32

2011 JEEP LIBERTY 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 4245 0.41

2011 JEEP LIBERTY RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 4245 0.41


2011 JEEP PATRIOT FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD MARGINAL GOOD GOOD POOR 3393 0.59

2011 JEEP WRANGLER 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD POOR MARGINAL ? MARGINAL 3782 0.51


2011 KIA BORREGO 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 KIA BORREGO FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2011 KIA BORREGO LAMBDA 3.8 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 KIA BORREGO LAMBDA 3.8 FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2011 KIA FORTE STA. WGN. FWD

CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] [14% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 4 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 2864 1.14

2011 KIA FORTE KOUP 2 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2011 KIA RIO 4 DR FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-moderate overlap rating in bottom 2%] [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [29% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]


2011 KIA RIO STA. WGN. FWD

CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-moderate overlap rating in bottom 2%] [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 3%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [29% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]


2011 KIA RONDO 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 KIA SEDONA FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 2%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR ? 4449 0.61

2011 KIA SORENTO 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3780 0.51

2011 KIA SORENTO FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3780 0.51


2011 KIA SPORTAGE 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3359 0.60

2011 KIA SPORTAGE FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3359 0.60



2011 LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 5697 0.11



2011 LEXUS ES350 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL GOOD POOR 3601 0.85

2011 LEXUS GS350 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 3718 0.81

2011 LEXUS GS350 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 3718 0.81

2011 LEXUS GS450H 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 3718 0.81


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2011 LEXUS GS460 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 3718 0.81


2011 LEXUS HS250H 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ? 3650 0.84


















2011 LINCOLN MKS 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4172 0.68

2011 LINCOLN MKS 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 4172 0.68




Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2011 LINCOLN MKX AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] ? 3 ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4272 0.41

2011 LINCOLN MKX FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] ? 3 ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4272 0.41

2011 LINCOLN MKZ 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 3 4 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3764 0.80

2011 LINCOLN MKZ 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 3 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3764 0.80

2011 LINCOLN MKZ HEV 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 3 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3720 0.81

2011 LINCOLN NAVIGATOR 4x2 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 LINCOLN NAVIGATOR 4x4 SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 LINCOLN TOWN CAR 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? GOOD ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 MAYBACH MAYBACH 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 MAZDA CX-7 AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL MARGINAL ? 3896 0.49

2011 MAZDA CX-7 FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL MARGINAL ? 3896 0.49

2011 MAZDA CX-9 AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL MARGINAL POOR 4463 0.37

2011 MAZDA CX-9 FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL MARGINAL POOR 4463 0.37

2011 MAZDA MAZDA 2 5 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [42% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]




2011 MAZDA MAZDA6 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE 3321 0.95


2011 MAZDA RX-8 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 MAZDA TRIBUTE 4DR SUV 4x2 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 3 3 3 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 3491 0.57

2011 MAZDA TRIBUTE 4DR SUV 4x4 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 3 3 3 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 3491 0.57

2011 MAZDA TRIBUTE HEV 4DR SUV 4x2 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 3 3 3 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 3491 0.57

2011 MAZDA TRIBUTE HEV 4DR SUV 4x4 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 3 3 3 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 3491 0.57

2011 MERCEDES-BENZ B-CLASS FUEL CELL 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2011 MERCEDES-BENZ B-CLASS FUEL CELL 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


15%] 4 3 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3733 0.81


15%] 4 3 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 3733 0.81

2011 MERCEDES-BENZ CL-CLASS 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2011 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3736 0.81




2011 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS CABRIOLET 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 MERCEDES-BENZ E-CLASS CABRIOLET 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2011 MERCEDES-BENZ GL-CLASS AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 5346 0.18

2011 MERCEDES-BENZ GL-CLASS RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 MERCEDES-BENZ GLK-CLASS 4 DR AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4157 0.43


2011 MERCEDES-BENZ ML-CLASS AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? 4817 0.29

2011 MERCEDES-BENZ ML-CLASS RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 MERCEDES-BENZ ML-CLASS HYBRID AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? 4817 0.29

2011 MERCEDES-BENZ ML-CLASS HYBRID RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 MERCEDES-BENZ R-CLASS AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 MERCEDES-BENZ R-CLASS RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? ? n/a weight n/a



Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2011 MERCEDES-BENZ SL-CLASS CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2011 MERCEDES-BENZ SLK-CLASS CONV. AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2011 MERCEDES-BENZ SLS AMG 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2011 MERCEDES-BENZ SPRINTER 2500 RWD TRUCK VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 MERCEDES-BENZ SPRINTER 2500 CARGO VAN RWD TRUCK VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 MERCEDES-BENZ SPRINTER 2500 P12 RWD TRUCK NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 1%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 1 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 MERCEDES-BENZ SPRINTER 3500 CAB CHASSIS RWD TRUCK VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 MERCEDES-BENZ SPRINTER 3500 CARGO VAN RWD TRUCK VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 4118 0.69

2011 MERCURY MARINER 4DR SUV 4x2 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 3 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3491 0.57

2011 MERCURY MARINER 4DR SUV 4x4 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 3 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3491 0.57

2011 MERCURY MARINER HEV 4DR SUV 4x2 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 3 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3491 0.57

2011 MERCURY MARINER HEV 4DR SUV 4x4 SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 3 3 3 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3491 0.57

2011 MERCURY MILAN 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 4 5 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3764 0.80

2011 MERCURY MILAN 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 4 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3764 0.80

2011 MERCURY MILAN HEV 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 3 4 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 3720 0.81





2011 MINI COOPER HARDTOP 3 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [29% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 2564 1.29




Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r











2011 MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE 3 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE SPYDER CONV. FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 MITSUBISHI ENDEAVOR AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL MARGINAL ? 4174 0.43

2011 MITSUBISHI ENDEAVOR FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL MARGINAL ? 4174 0.43

2011 MITSUBISHI GALANT 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ? 3438 0.91

2011 MITSUBISHI LANCER 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [9% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2984 1.09

2011 MITSUBISHI LANCER 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [9% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2984 1.09

2011 MITSUBISHI LANCER 5 HB AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [9% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2984 1.09

2011 MITSUBISHI LANCER 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [9% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 2984 1.09


2011 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3294 0.61

2011 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE 3294 0.61

2011 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER SPORT AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 3512 0.57

2011 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER SPORT FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 3512 0.57



2011 NISSAN ALTIMA 2 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD note (C) ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 3196 1.00


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2011 NISSAN ALTIMA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [4% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 3111 1.04

2011 NISSAN ALTIMA HEV 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [4% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 3111 1.04


2011 NISSAN ARMADA RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5372 0.18


2011 NISSAN CUBE TRUCK FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [16% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2833 1.16






2011 NISSAN JUKE 4WD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [10% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 2955 1.10

2011 NISSAN JUKE RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [10% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD POOR 2955 1.10

2011 NISSAN LEAF 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] 5 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3351 0.94

2011 NISSAN MAXIMA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 5 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE 3532 0.88



2011 NISSAN PATHFINDER 4WD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL MARGINAL ? 4721 0.31

2011 NISSAN PATHFINDER RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL MARGINAL ? 4721 0.31


2011 NISSAN QX56 4WD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 NISSAN QX56 RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a




Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2011 NISSAN SENTRA 4 DR FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [12% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

4 3 3 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ? 2917 1.12

2011 NISSAN TITAN PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD MARGINAL GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 5008 0.39

2011 NISSAN TITAN PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD MARGINAL GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 5008 0.39

2011 NISSAN TITAN PU/EC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 5008 0.39

2011 NISSAN TITAN PU/EC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 5008 0.39

2011 NISSAN VERSA 4 DR FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [30% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

2 3 2 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 2539 1.30

2011 NISSAN VERSA 5 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 8%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [30% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

2 3 2 4 NO GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? ACCEPTABLE ? 2539 1.30









2011 PORSCHE 911 CARRERA GTS 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a




2011 PORSCHE 911 GT3 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2011 PORSCHE 911 SPEEDSTER CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 PORSCHE 911 TARGA 4 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 PORSCHE 911 TARGA 4S 2 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r









2011 PORSCHE BOXSTER SPYDER CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a







2011 PORSCHE PANAMERA 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 PORSCHE PANAMERA 4 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 PORSCHE PANAMERA 4S 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 PORSCHE PANAMERA S 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 PORSCHE PANAMERA TURBO 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 RAM 1500 PU/RC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 2 2 3 3 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD MARGINAL ? 5249 0.35

2011 RAM 1500 PU/RC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] 3 2 3 4 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD MARGINAL ? 5249 0.35

2011 RAM 2500 PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5532 0.31

2011 RAM 2500 PU/CC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5532 0.31


2011 RAM 2500 PU/EC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r




2011 RAM 2500 PU/RC RWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 RAM 1500 CREW PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 3 2 5 3 NO GOOD MARGINAL GOOD MARGINAL ? 5249 0.35

2011 RAM 1500 CREW PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] 3 2 5 4 NO GOOD MARGINAL GOOD MARGINAL ? 5249 0.35

2011 RAM 1500 QUAD PU/CC 4WD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating in bottom 4%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] 3 2 5 3 NO GOOD MARGINAL GOOD MARGINAL ? 5249 0.35

2011 RAM 1500 QUAD PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 3%] 3 2 5 4 NO GOOD ? GOOD MARGINAL ? 5249 0.35



2011 ROLLS-ROYCE PHANTOM CONVERTIBLE CONV. RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 ROLLS-ROYCE PHANTOM COUPE 2 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2011 SAAB 9-3 4 DR 4WD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3344 0.94

2011 SAAB 9-3 4 DR RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3344 0.94

2011 SAAB 9-3 CONV. FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? GOOD GOOD ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 SAAB 9-3 STA. WGN. 4WD


2011 SAAB 9-3 STA. WGN. RWD


2011 SAAB 9-5 4 DR 4WD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a

2011 SAAB 9-5 4 DR RWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3832 0.78

2011 SAAB 9-4X AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4505 0.36

2011 SAAB 9-4X FWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4505 0.36

2011 SMART FORTWO 2 DR RWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 14%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [73% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

? ? ? 3 NO GOOD ? ACCEPTABLE GOOD ? 1828 1.73

2011 SMART FORTWO CONV. RWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 3 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a


2011 SUBARU FORESTER (later release) AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3254 0.62


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2011 SUBARU IMPREZA 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [3% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3132 1.03



2011 SUBARU LEGACY 4 DR AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 5 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3344 0.94

2011 SUBARU OUTBACK AWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 4 4 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3344 0.94










2011 SUZUKI SX4 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [14% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL MARGINAL ? 2868 1.14

2011 SUZUKI SX4 STA. WGN. AWD

CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [14% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL MARGINAL ? 2868 1.14

2011 SUZUKI SX4 STA. WGN. FWD

CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [14% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL MARGINAL ? 2868 1.14

2011 TOYOTA 4RUNNER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 4734 0.31

2011 TOYOTA 4RUNNER RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 4734 0.31

2011 TOYOTA AVALON 4 DR FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3583 0.86

2011 TOYOTA CAMRY 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] 3 3 3 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL GOOD ? 3287 0.97

2011 TOYOTA CAMRY (later release) 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 3 4 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL GOOD ? 3287 0.97

2011 TOYOTA CAMRY HV 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 7%] 3 3 3 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL GOOD ? 3287 0.97

2011 TOYOTA CAMRY HV (later release) 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 4 3 4 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL GOOD ? 3287 0.97

2011 TOYOTA COROLLA 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 3%] [20% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] 3 4 2 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2754 1.20


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2011 TOYOTA FJ CRUISER AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 4338 0.40

2011 TOYOTA FJ CRUISER RWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 4338 0.40










2011 TOYOTA RAV4 AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 3 3 4 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3507 0.57

2011 TOYOTA RAV4 FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] [NHTSA side impact rating in bottom 17%] 3 3 4 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD ACCEPTABLE ? 3507 0.57

2011 TOYOTA SCION IQ 3 HB FWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a




2011 TOYOTA SCION XD 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-moderate overlap rating in bottom 2%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [25% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? NO ACCEPTABLE GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2641 1.25

2011 TOYOTA SEQUOIA AWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? 5680 0.11

2011 TOYOTA SEQUOIA RWD SUV VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a



2011 TOYOTA TACOMA PU/CC AWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] 4 3 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 4233 0.53

2011 TOYOTA TACOMA PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 15%] 4 3 5 4 NO GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ? 4233 0.53

2011 TOYOTA TACOMA PU/EC AWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD MARGINAL ? 3922 0.60

2011 TOYOTA TACOMA PU/EC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD MARGINAL ? 3922 0.60

2011 TOYOTA TACOMA PU/RC AWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD MARGINAL ? 3922 0.60


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r



2011 TOYOTA TACOMA PU/RC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 11%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD note (C) GOOD MARGINAL ? 3922 0.60

2011 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/CC AWD PU VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 5142 0.37

2011 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/CC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] ? ? ? 3 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 5142 0.37

2011 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/EC AWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ? 5581 0.31

2011 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/EC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ? 5581 0.31

2011 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/RC AWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 4 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ? 5581 0.31

2011 TOYOTA TUNDRA PU/RC RWD PU NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [NHTSA frontal impact rating in bottom 71%] [NHTSA rollover rating in bottom 20%] [IIHS ratings incomplete] 4 4 5 3 ? GOOD note (C) GOOD GOOD ? 5581 0.31



2011 TOYOTA YARIS 3 HB FWD CARNOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS side impact rating unknown for this body style] [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [38% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight]

? ? ? 4 NO GOOD note (C) MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ? 2401 1.38

2011 TOYOTA YARIS 4 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [38% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ? 2401 1.38

2011 TOYOTA YARIS 5 HB FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS rear impact rating in bottom 7%] [IIHS roof rating in bottom 20%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [38% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? 4 NO GOOD GOOD MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE ? 2401 1.38













passenger car--- due to low weight] 4 4 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 2963 1.10


FWDCAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3234 0.99

2011 VOLKSWAGEN ROUTAN FWD VAN NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 24%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS

ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? GOOD GOOD GOOD ? POOR n/a weight n/a

2011 VOLKSWAGEN TIGUAN AWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3665 0.54

2011 VOLKSWAGEN TIGUAN FWD SUV NOT RECOMMENDED: [IIHS frontal impact-small overlap rating in bottom 55%] [NHTSA ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD MARGINAL 3665 0.54


Year

Mak

e

Mod

el

Bod

y / D

rive-

Trai

n

Cla

ss February 1, 2015

NH

TSA

Ove

rall

Star

Rat

ing

N

HTS

A F

ront

al Im

pact

Sta

r Rat

ing

N

HTS

A S

ide

Impa

ct S

tar R

atin

g

NH

TSA

Rol

love

r Sta

r Rat

ing

IIHS

Top

Pick

?

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- m

oder

ate

over

lap

IIHS

Side

Impa

ct R

atin

g

IIHS

Rea

r Im

pact

Rat

ing

IIHS

Roo

f Str

engt

h R

atin

g

IIHS

Fron

tal I

mpa

ct R

atin

g

- s

mal

l ove

rlap

Vehi

cle

Wei

ght (

lbs.

)

(N

HTS

A o

r IIH

S Te

st V

ehic

le W

eigh

t)

Driv

er W

eigh

t-Effe

ct F

atal

ity F

acto

r




2011 VOLVO C30 2 DR FWD CAR NOT RECOMMENDED: [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [1% higher driver fatality risk than a 3200 lb. passenger car--- due to low weight] ? ? ? ? YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 3187 1.01


2011 VOLVO S40 4 DR AWD CAR VITAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT DATA MISSING [NHTSA ratings incomplete] [IIHS ratings incomplete] ? ? ? 4 ? ? ? ? ? ? n/a weight n/a




2011 VOLVO V50 STA. WGN. AWD


2011 VOLVO V50 STA. WGN. FWD


2011 VOLVO XC60 AWD SUV SAFEST 1% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4180 0.43

2011 VOLVO XC60 FWD SUV SAFEST 1% (Note: This vehicle has not been tested for small overlap frontal impact by IIHS) 5 5 5 4 YES GOOD GOOD GOOD GOOD ? 4180 0.43








informedforlife.org safety assessment...2015 bmw 335i xdrive gt 5 hb awd car not recommended: [nhtsa...

Documents