sac lec 2 nm
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Pablo Picasso – Guernica (1937)Oil on canvas (349 x 776cm)
Sociology, Art & Culture(SOCY100012)
Lecture 2: Philosophy and art: the aesthetic, beauty, and the end of art?
Neil McPhersonSchool of Social SciencesRoom: A820Tel: 01698 283100 x8479Email: [email protected] Apr 10, 2023
Philosophy and art
“Art tends to rebel against scientific images of the world, while
sociology tends to thrive on demystifying the enchanting in social
life. Art tends to revolt against materialistic explanations of life, while
sociology tends to exult in exposing singular and unique as socially
constructed and socially reproduced”
(Harrington 2004: 9)
The philosophical understanding of art pre-dates the sociological conception of art that emerged in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries
The philosophers constructed ‘metaphysical conceptions’ of art that did not consider the historical and social nature of art
In these conceptions art is seen as timeless and asocial
Metaphysical Conceptions of Art
Art as beauty
From Plato, philosophers have argued that art exists as beauty that elevates the mind, allowing individuals to gain knowledge of the beauty and unchanging nature of the cosmos
Compositions were hierarchised – historical, mythological and biblical
scenes
portraiture & landscape
realistic scenes of ‘daily life’
Plato viewed beauty as eternal, absolute and transcendent – a view that
is not compatible with modern concepts of beauty
Metaphysical Conceptions of Art
Art as the imitation of nature
A conception of art in which nature exists as the image of perfection and
art imitates that perfection – the doctrine of mimesis
Reproduction of reality – trompe d’oeil & the doctrine of illusionism
(influential during the Renaissance)
However, in the same way that ideas of beauty change historically, so to
different cultures represent nature differently
As the Enlightenment grew in influence, the aforementioned doctrines
became less influential and the focus shifted to a humanly subjective
understanding of beauty & engagement with art. (see Harrington 2004)
Metaphysical Conceptions of Art
Art as aesthetic experience
Derived from the Greek aisthesis – the study of pleasure in perfection
Aesthetics – a branch of philosophy focused on the concepts of beauty and
taste
– focused on experiencing pleasure in sensory objects
– concerned with judgements of taste in relation to ‘works of
art’
The Age of Enlightenment and Romanticism – human rationality and
emotion
The external world engaged in the mind rather than directly through sense
perceptions (we know more than the objects around us – value, belief &
tradition)
Ideas & idealism – search for objective, universal knowledge in human
thought
(see Grenfell & Hardy 2007; Harrington 2004)
Kant: Aesthetics & Art
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) – The Critique of Judgement (1790)
Can we have knowledge of art that is prior to experience?
Taste & beauty – part of Kant’s wider philosophical system
Nature is God’s “unfathomably great art” (Kant 1987: 334)
For Kant beauty is a judgment – that is, it is not a fixed concept
Taste – individual’s subjective feeling of pleasure of the object – sensory pleasure – judgments of taste are produced by pleasure, unlike moral judgements or judgments of fact
Kant: Aesthetics & Art
Where Hume sees the experience of beauty as merely subjective, Kant sees it as a logical judgment (this differs from his early discussions of beauty and taste)
Exercise of rational
judgment
Exercise of rational
judgment
Act of sensuous feelingAct of sensuous feeling
Expression of personal feeling
Expression of personal feeling
Act of the mindAct of the mind
AESTHETIC JUDGEMENT
ART
AESTHETIC JUDGEMENT
ART
Kant: Aesthetics & Art
“[W]hile it is true that beauty needs to be appreciated subjectively,
when we see beautiful things we are aware that the pleasure we
derive from them is not a function of something peculiar to us, some
‘personal condition to which our subjective self might alone be party’”
(Graham 2005: 18)
“Aesthetic judgment is thus to be distinguished (1) from a judgment of
fact because it is subjective, (2) from the merely subjective because it
commands the assent of others, (3) from a judgement grounded in
practical rationality because the beautiful has no practical purpose,
and (4) from the fanciful or superficially attractive because it has the
mark of purposefulness”
(Graham 2005: 18)
Sensus commnis – common sensitive nature
Kant: Aesthetics & Art
“[For Kant] a judgement of beauty is a disinterested, universal, and necessary judgment concerning the pleasure that everyone ought to derive from the experience of a form of purpose”
(Dickie 1997: 22)
Disinterestedness – focus solely on appearance of art object itself – no attempt to locate meaning in wider context
Universality – since the experience of beauty is not subjective beauty is evident to all
Necessity – when we identify something as beautiful we demand that everyone agrees as its beauty is identifiable to all – although not everyone will agree
Form of purpose – focuses on the object – purposiviness without purpose
Kant: Aesthetics & Art
What is important is form not content – this avoids criticisms of subjectivity – therefore the aesthetic beauty of the art work is ahistorical (timeless) and asocial
For Kant the art object is an end in itself and is without purpose – its aesthetic beauty is inherent in the form of the work itself and evident through judgments of taste
The possession of true ‘genius’ allows the exhibition of ‘aesthetic ideas’ – innate ideas of imagination and understanding not constrained by other thoughts or concepts – the capacity to create new rules and not follow existing ones – to create art outside of external determination and constraint
(see Gaiger 2002)
Kant: Aesthetics & Art
Kant argued that in affirming ‘a judgement of taste’, the individual making
the judgement was not making any claim as to the objects value, or its
moral worth or practical use
He was simply referring to the pleasure it brought to the senses through
‘disinterested contemplation’
Building on Kant, Clive Bell (1914) argues that artistic quality is located in the
‘significant form’ of the art work, rather than any narrative or
representational content
Greenberg (1986-93) adds historical concept – he states that by continually
removing and excluding all links to external conditions and concerns, art
can be ‘purified’ – only accessible through the aesthetic beauty of its form
Philosophy and Art: Kant
Kant has been used to explain the aesthetic value of post-impressionist art,
such as the work of Cezanne and Gauguin, where form is emphasised over
representational depiction (Bell 1914; Fry 1920)
Paul Cezanne - Château Noir
(1900-04) Oil on canvas
(73.7 x 96.6 cm)
Kasimir Malevich – Black Square and Red Square (1915)
Oil on canvas (71.4 x 44.4cm) Georges Braque – Woman with a Guitar (1913) Oil and charcoal on canvas (130 x 73 cm)
Hegel: The Aesthetic and the End of Art
Georg W.F. Hegel (1770-1831) – Phenomenology of Spirit (1807), Encyclopedia
of the Philosophical Sciences (1817)
Rather than individual’s response to beauty (Kant), Hegel focused on
content and meaning of art works
Art operates on the level of sensuous experience and reveals
comprehensive truth of position of humanity – like religion & philosophy
Art is externalised human self consciousness
Focuses on artistic beauty as above natural beauty – it can be philosophised
Hegel’s aesthetics provide the ‘cornerstone of the discipline of art history’ (Geczy 2008: 107)
Hegel: The Aesthetic and the End of Art
For Hegel, the human spirit manifested in art in an evolutionary manner
The history of art represented of the history of man
Art identified the progression of the human spirit towards self-awareness
Art, therefore, was teleologically progressive – working towards an endpoint
where man would fully know himself as the true nature of the spirit was
revealed
Productive tension in the idea and form of the art work –– each can be
inadequate in themselves and in relation to each other
Hegel: The Aesthetic and the End of Art
Early civilisations – symbolic art – tension between idea
and form (distorted representations of God) – form did
not fulfil idea
Classical (Greek) – unity of idea and form – the idea
represented through the idealised human form – unity
of religious awareness and artistic expression
– highest level of art
Hegel: The Aesthetic and the End of Art
Romantic (all art since Greek times)
growing tension between religious awareness and
artistic expression (idea and form)
growing inwardness and self reflection (understanding
of humanity’s relationship with God located in realm of
thought rather than physical expression)
the image can no longer truly represent the idea
Art can no longer articulate the content it aspires to
Carl Gustav Carus (1869) Das Kolosseum in einer Mondnach
Caspar David Friedrich (1818) Chalk Cliffs on Rügen
Hegel: The Aesthetic and the End of Art
For Hegel, art has been overtaken by religion and philosophy in terms of
being able to articulate and examine human existence – art is no longer
seen as divine revelation
Art now something that philosophy can examine and explain
(see Cheetham 2001; Gaiger 2002)
Hegel: The Aesthetic and the End of Art
Art is seen as a representation of human self understanding – it is a stage prior to philosophy
Art is the product of its age and the ideas of that age
Hegel linked art to historical context for the first time through philosophical discussion
Showed the historically located nature of the production and appreciation of art works
In contrast to Kant, Hegel identifies the importance of content and form (rather than just form) and identifies the historically located nature of art (against the concept of historical aesthetic beauty)
Both influential in the emergence of art history as a discipline and also in sociology’s engagement with art