s7 - 1© 2011 pearson education, inc. publishing as prentice hall s7 capacity and constraint...

68
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 1 S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to PowerPoint presentation to accompany accompany Heizer and Render Heizer and Render Operations Management, 10e Operations Management, 10e Principles of Operations Principles of Operations Management, 8e Management, 8e PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl

Upload: rogelio-radley

Post on 31-Mar-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 1

S7S7 Capacity and Constraint Management

Capacity and Constraint Management

PowerPoint presentation to accompany PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and Render Heizer and Render Operations Management, 10e Operations Management, 10e Principles of Operations Management, 8ePrinciples of Operations Management, 8e

PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl

Page 2: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 2

OutlineOutline

Capacity Design and Effective Capacity

Capacity and Strategy

Capacity Considerations

Managing Demand

Demand and Capacity Management in the Service Sector

Page 3: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 3

Outline – ContinuedOutline – Continued Bottleneck Analysis and Theory of

Constraints Process Times for Stations,

Systems, and Cycles

Theory of Constraints

Bottleneck Management

Break-Even Analysis Single-Product Case

Multiproduct Case

Page 4: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 4

Outline – ContinuedOutline – Continued Reducing Risk with Incremental

Changes

Applying Expected Monetary Value to Capacity Decisions

Applying Investment Analysis to Strategy-Driven Investments Investment, Variable Cost, and

Cash Flow

Net Present Value

Page 5: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 5

Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives

When you complete this supplement, When you complete this supplement, you should be able to:you should be able to:

1. Define capacity

2. Determine design capacity, effective capacity, and utilization

3. Perform bottleneck analysis

4. Compute break-even analysis

Page 6: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 6

Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives

When you complete this supplement, When you complete this supplement, you should be able to:you should be able to:

5. Determine the expected monetary value of a capacity decision

6. Compute net present value

Page 7: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 7

Process StrategiesProcess Strategies

The objective of a process strategy is The objective of a process strategy is to build a production process that to build a production process that meets customer requirements and meets customer requirements and product specifications within cost product specifications within cost and other managerial constraintsand other managerial constraints

Page 8: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 8

CapacityCapacity

The throughput, or the number of units a facility can hold, receive, store, or produce in a period of time

Determines fixed costs

Determines if demand will be satisfied

Three time horizons

Page 9: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 9

Planning Over a Time Planning Over a Time HorizonHorizon

Figure S7.1

Modify capacity Use capacity

Intermediate-range planning

Subcontract Add personnelAdd equipment Build or use inventory Add shifts

Short-range planning

Schedule jobsSchedule personnel Allocate machinery*

Long-range planning

Add facilitiesAdd long lead time equipment *

* Difficult to adjust capacity as limited options exist

Options for Adjusting Capacity

Page 10: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 10

Design and Effective Design and Effective CapacityCapacity

Design capacity is the maximum theoretical output of a system Normally expressed as a rate

Effective capacity is the capacity a firm expects to achieve given current operating constraints Often lower than design capacity

Page 11: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 11

Utilization and EfficiencyUtilization and Efficiency

Utilization is the percent of design capacity Utilization is the percent of design capacity achievedachieved

Efficiency is the percent of effective capacity Efficiency is the percent of effective capacity achievedachieved

Utilization = Actual output/Design capacity

Efficiency = Actual output/Effective capacity

Page 12: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 12

Bakery ExampleBakery Example

Actual production last week = 148,000 rollsEffective capacity = 175,000 rollsDesign capacity = 1,200 rolls per hourBakery operates 7 days/week, 3 - 8 hour shifts

Design capacity = (7 x 3 x 8) x (1,200) = 201,600 rolls

Page 13: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 13

Bakery ExampleBakery Example

Actual production last week = 148,000 rollsEffective capacity = 175,000 rollsDesign capacity = 1,200 rolls per hourBakery operates 7 days/week, 3 - 8 hour shifts

Design capacity = (7 x 3 x 8) x (1,200) = 201,600 rolls

Page 14: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 14

Bakery ExampleBakery Example

Actual production last week = 148,000 rollsEffective capacity = 175,000 rollsDesign capacity = 1,200 rolls per hourBakery operates 7 days/week, 3 - 8 hour shifts

Design capacity = (7 x 3 x 8) x (1,200) = 201,600 rolls

Utilization = 148,000/201,600 = 73.4%

Page 15: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 15

Bakery ExampleBakery Example

Actual production last week = 148,000 rollsEffective capacity = 175,000 rollsDesign capacity = 1,200 rolls per hourBakery operates 7 days/week, 3 - 8 hour shifts

Design capacity = (7 x 3 x 8) x (1,200) = 201,600 rolls

Utilization = 148,000/201,600 = 73.4%

Page 16: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 16

Bakery ExampleBakery Example

Actual production last week = 148,000 rollsEffective capacity = 175,000 rollsDesign capacity = 1,200 rolls per hourBakery operates 7 days/week, 3 - 8 hour shifts

Design capacity = (7 x 3 x 8) x (1,200) = 201,600 rolls

Utilization = 148,000/201,600 = 73.4%

Efficiency = 148,000/175,000 = 84.6%

Page 17: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 17

Bakery ExampleBakery Example

Actual production last week = 148,000 rollsEffective capacity = 175,000 rollsDesign capacity = 1,200 rolls per hourBakery operates 7 days/week, 3 - 8 hour shifts

Design capacity = (7 x 3 x 8) x (1,200) = 201,600 rolls

Utilization = 148,000/201,600 = 73.4%

Efficiency = 148,000/175,000 = 84.6%

Page 18: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 18

Bakery ExampleBakery Example

Actual production last week = 148,000 rollsEffective capacity = 175,000 rollsDesign capacity = 1,200 rolls per hourBakery operates 7 days/week, 3 - 8 hour shiftsEfficiency = 84.6%Efficiency of new line = 75%

Expected Output = (Effective Capacity)(Efficiency)

= (175,000)(.75) = 131,250 rolls

Page 19: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 19

Bakery ExampleBakery Example

Actual production last week = 148,000 rollsEffective capacity = 175,000 rollsDesign capacity = 1,200 rolls per hourBakery operates 7 days/week, 3 - 8 hour shiftsEfficiency = 84.6%Efficiency of new line = 75%

Expected Output = (Effective Capacity)(Efficiency)

= (175,000)(.75) = 131,250 rolls

Page 20: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 20

Capacity and StrategyCapacity and Strategy

Capacity decisions impact all 10 decisions of operations management as well as other functional areas of the organization

Capacity decisions must be integrated into the organization’s mission and strategy

Page 21: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 21

Capacity ConsiderationsCapacity Considerations

1. Forecast demand accurately

2. Understand the technology and capacity increments

3. Find the optimum operating level (volume)

4. Build for change

Page 22: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 22

Economies and Economies and Diseconomies of ScaleDiseconomies of Scale

Economies of scale

Diseconomies of scale

25 - room roadside motel 50 - room

roadside motel

75 - room roadside motel

Number of Rooms25 50 75

Av

era

ge

un

it c

os

t(d

olla

rs p

er

roo

m p

er n

igh

t)

Figure S7.2

Page 23: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 23

Managing DemandManaging Demand Demand exceeds capacity

Curtail demand by raising prices, scheduling longer lead time

Long term solution is to increase capacity

Capacity exceeds demand Stimulate market

Product changes

Adjusting to seasonal demands Produce products with complementary

demand patterns

Page 24: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 24

Complementary Demand Complementary Demand PatternsPatterns

4,000 –

3,000 –

2,000 –

1,000 –

J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J

Sal

es i

n u

nit

s

Time (months)

Jet ski engine sales

Figure S7.3

Page 25: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 25

Complementary Demand Complementary Demand PatternsPatterns

4,000 –

3,000 –

2,000 –

1,000 –

J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J

Sal

es i

n u

nit

s

Time (months)

Snowmobile motor sales

Jet ski engine sales

Figure S7.3

Page 26: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 26

Complementary Demand Complementary Demand PatternsPatterns

4,000 –

3,000 –

2,000 –

1,000 –

J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J

Sal

es i

n u

nit

s

Time (months)

Combining both demand patterns reduces the variation

Snowmobile motor sales

Jet ski engine sales

Figure S7.3

Page 27: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 27

Tactics for Matching Tactics for Matching Capacity to DemandCapacity to Demand

1. Making staffing changes

2. Adjusting equipment Purchasing additional machinery

Selling or leasing out existing equipment

3. Improving processes to increase throughput

4. Redesigning products to facilitate more throughput

5. Adding process flexibility to meet changing product preferences

6. Closing facilities

Page 28: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 28

Demand and Capacity Demand and Capacity Management in the Service Management in the Service

SectorSector Demand management

Appointment, reservations, FCFS rule

Capacity management Full time,

temporary, part-time staff

Page 29: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 29

Bottleneck Analysis and Bottleneck Analysis and Theory of ConstraintsTheory of Constraints

Each work area can have its own unique capacity

Capacity analysis determines the throughput capacity of workstations in a system

A bottleneck is a limiting factor or constraint

A bottleneck has the lowest effective capacity in a system

Page 30: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 30

Process Times for Stations, Process Times for Stations, Systems, and CyclesSystems, and Cycles

The process time of a stationprocess time of a station is the time to produce a unit at that single workstation

The process time of a systemprocess time of a system is the time of the longest process in the system … the bottleneck

The process cycle timeprocess cycle time is the time it takes for a product to go through the production process with no waiting

These two might be quite

different!

Page 31: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 31

A Three-Station A Three-Station Assembly LineAssembly Line

Figure S7.4

2 min/unit 4 min/unit 3 min/unit

A B C

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 32: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 32

Process Times for Stations, Process Times for Stations, Systems, and CyclesSystems, and Cycles

The system process timesystem process time is the process time of the bottleneck after dividing by the number of parallel operations

The system capacitysystem capacity is the inverse of the system process time

The process cycle timeprocess cycle time is the total time through the longest path in the system

Page 33: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 33

Capacity AnalysisCapacity Analysis Two identical sandwich lines

Lines have two workers and three operations

All completed sandwiches are wrapped

Wrap

37.5 sec/sandwich

Order

30 sec/sandwich

Bread Fill Toast

15 sec/sandwich 20 sec/sandwich 40 sec/sandwich

Bread Fill Toast

15 sec/sandwich 20 sec/sandwich 40 sec/sandwich

Page 34: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 34

Capacity Capacity AnalysisAnalysis Wrap

37.5 sec

Order

30 sec

Bread Fill Toast

15 sec 20 sec 40 sec

Bread Fill Toast

15 sec 20 sec 40 sec

Toast work station has the longest processing time – 40 seconds

The two lines each deliver a sandwich every 40 seconds so the process time of the combined lines is 40/2 = 20 seconds

At 37.5 seconds, wrapping and delivery has the longest processing time and is the bottleneck

Capacity per hour is 3,600 seconds/37.5 seconds/sandwich = 96 sandwiches per hour

Process cycle time is 30 + 15 + 20 + 40 + 37.5 = 142.5 seconds

Page 35: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 35

Capacity AnalysisCapacity Analysis Standard process for cleaning teeth

Cleaning and examining X-rays can happen simultaneously

Checkout

6 min/unit

Check in

2 min/unit

DevelopsX-ray

4 min/unit 8 min/unit

DentistTakesX-ray

2 min/unit

5 min/unit

X-rayexam

Cleaning

24 min/unit

Page 36: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 36

Capacity Capacity AnalysisAnalysis All possible paths must be compared

Cleaning path is 2 + 2 + 4 + 24 + 8 + 6 = 46 minutes

X-ray exam path is 2 + 2 + 4 + 5 + 8 + 6 = 27 minutes

Longest path involves the hygienist cleaning the teeth

Bottleneck is the hygienist at 24 minutes

Hourly capacity is 60/24 = 2.5 patients

Patient should be complete in 46 minutes

Checkout

6 min/unit

Check in

2 min/unit

DevelopsX-ray

4 min/unit 8 min/unit

DentistTakesX-ray

2 min/unit

5 min/unit

X-rayexam

Cleaning

24 min/unit

Page 37: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 37

Theory of ConstraintsTheory of Constraints

Five-step process for recognizing and managing limitations

Step 1:Step 1: Identify the constraint

Step 2:Step 2: Develop a plan for overcoming the constraints

Step 3:Step 3: Focus resources on accomplishing Step 2

Step 4:Step 4: Reduce the effects of constraints by offloading work or expanding capability

Step 5:Step 5: Once overcome, go back to Step 1 and find new constraints

Page 38: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 38

Bottleneck ManagementBottleneck Management

1. Release work orders to the system at the pace of set by the bottleneck

2. Lost time at the bottleneck represents lost time for the whole system

3. Increasing the capacity of a non-bottleneck station is a mirage

4. Increasing the capacity of a bottleneck increases the capacity of the whole system

Page 39: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 39

Break-Even AnalysisBreak-Even Analysis

Technique for evaluating process and equipment alternatives

Objective is to find the point in dollars and units at which cost equals revenue

Requires estimation of fixed costs, variable costs, and revenue

Page 40: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 40

Break-Even AnalysisBreak-Even Analysis Fixed costs are costs that continue

even if no units are produced Depreciation, taxes, debt, mortgage

payments

Variable costs are costs that vary with the volume of units produced Labor, materials, portion of utilities

Contribution is the difference between selling price and variable cost

Page 41: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 41

Break-Even AnalysisBreak-Even Analysis

Costs and revenue are linear functions Generally not the case in the

real world

We actually know these costs Very difficult to verify

Time value of money is often ignored

AssumptionsAssumptions

Page 42: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 42

Profit corri

dor

Loss

corridor

Break-Even AnalysisBreak-Even AnalysisTotal revenue line

Total cost line

Variable cost

Fixed cost

Break-even pointTotal cost = Total revenue

900 –

800 –

700 –

600 –

500 –

400 –

300 –

200 –

100 –

–| | | | | | | | | | | |

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001100

Co

st in

do

llars

Volume (units per period)Figure S7.5

Page 43: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 43

Break-Even AnalysisBreak-Even Analysis

BEPx = break-even point in unitsBEP$ = break-even point in dollarsP = price per unit (after all discounts)

x = number of units producedTR= total revenue = PxF = fixed costsV = variable cost per unitTC= total costs = F + Vx

TR = TCor

Px = F + Vx

Break-even point occurs whenBreak-even point occurs when

BEPx =F

P - V

Page 44: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 44

Break-Even AnalysisBreak-Even Analysis

BEPx = break-even point in unitsBEP$ = break-even point in dollarsP = price per unit (after all discounts)

x = number of units producedTR= total revenue = PxF = fixed costsV = variable cost per unitTC= total costs = F + Vx

BEP$ = BEPx P

= P

=

=

F(P - V)/P

FP - V

F1 - V/P

Profit = TR - TC= Px - (F + Vx)= Px - F - Vx= (P - V)x - F

Page 45: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 45

Break-Even ExampleBreak-Even Example

Fixed costs = $10,000 Material = $.75/unitDirect labor = $1.50/unit Selling price = $4.00 per unit

BEP$ = =F

1 - (V/P)$10,000

1 - [(1.50 + .75)/(4.00)]

Page 46: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 46

Break-Even ExampleBreak-Even Example

Fixed costs = $10,000 Material = $.75/unitDirect labor = $1.50/unit Selling price = $4.00 per unit

BEP$ = =F

1 - (V/P)$10,000

1 - [(1.50 + .75)/(4.00)]

= = $22,857.14$10,000

.4375

BEPx = = = 5,714F

P - V$10,000

4.00 - (1.50 + .75)

Page 47: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 47

Break-Even ExampleBreak-Even Example

50,000 –

40,000 –

30,000 –

20,000 –

10,000 –

–| | | | | |

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000

Do

llars

Units

Fixed costs

Total costs

Revenue

Break-even point

Page 48: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 48

Break-Even ExampleBreak-Even Example

BEP$ =F

∑ 1 - x (Wi)Vi

Pi

Multiproduct CaseMultiproduct Case

where V = variable cost per unitP = price per unitF = fixed costs

W = percent each product is of total dollar salesi = each product

Page 49: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 49

Multiproduct ExampleMultiproduct Example

Annual ForecastedItem Price Cost Sales UnitsSandwich $5.00 $3.00 9,000Drink 1.50 .50 9,000Baked potato 2.00 1.00 7,000

Fixed costs = $3,000 per month

Page 50: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 50

Multiproduct ExampleMultiproduct Example

Annual ForecastedItem Price Cost Sales UnitsSandwich $5.00 $3.00 9,000Drink 1.50 .50 9,000Baked potato 2.00 1.00 7,000

Fixed costs = $3,000 per month

Sandwich $5.00 $3.00 .60 .40 $45,000 .621 .248Drinks 1.50 .50 .33 .67 13,500 .186 .125Baked 2.00 1.00 .50 .50 14,000 .193 .096 potato

$72,500 1.000 .469

Annual WeightedSelling Variable Forecasted % of Contribution

Item (i) Price (P) Cost (V) (V/P) 1 - (V/P) Sales $ Sales (col 5 x col 7)

Page 51: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 51

Multiproduct ExampleMultiproduct Example

Annual ForecastedItem Price Cost Sales UnitsSandwich $5.00 $3.00 9,000Drink 1.50 .50 9,000Baked potato 2.00 1.00 7,000

Fixed costs = $3,000 per month

Sandwich $5.00 $3.00 .60 .40 $45,000 .621 .248Drinks 1.50 .50 .33 .67 13,500 .186 .125Baked 2.00 1.00 .50 .50 14,000 .193 .096 potato

$72,500 1.000 .469

Annual WeightedSelling Variable Forecasted % of Contribution

Item (i) Price (P) Cost (V) (V/P) 1 - (V/P) Sales $ Sales (col 5 x col 7)

BEP$ =F

∑ 1 - x (Wi)Vi

Pi

= = $76,759$3,000 x 12

.469

Daily sales = = $246.02

$76,759312 days

.621 x $246.02$5.00 = 30.6 31

sandwichesper day

Page 52: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 52

Reducing Risk with Reducing Risk with Incremental ChangesIncremental Changes

(a) Leading demand with incremental expansion

Dem

and

Expected demand

New capacity

(c) Attempts to have an average capacity with incremental expansion

Dem

and

New capacity Expected

demand

(b) Capacity lags demand with incremental expansion

Dem

and

New capacity

Expected demand

Figure S7.6

Page 53: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 53

Reducing Risk with Reducing Risk with Incremental ChangesIncremental Changes

(a) Leading demand with incremental expansion

Expected demand

Figure S7.6

New capacity

Dem

and

Time (years)1 2 3

Page 54: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 54

Reducing Risk with Reducing Risk with Incremental ChangesIncremental Changes

(b) Capacity lags demand with incremental expansion

Expected demand

Figure S7.6

Dem

and

Time (years)1 2 3

New capacity

Page 55: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 55

Reducing Risk with Reducing Risk with Incremental ChangesIncremental Changes(c) Attempts to have an average capacity

with incremental expansion

Expected demand

Figure S7.6

New capacity

Dem

and

Time (years)1 2 3

Page 56: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 56

Expected Monetary Value Expected Monetary Value (EMV) and Capacity Decisions(EMV) and Capacity Decisions

Determine states of nature Future demand

Market favorability

Analyzed using decision trees Hospital supply company

Four alternatives

Page 57: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 57

Expected Monetary Value Expected Monetary Value (EMV) and Capacity Decisions(EMV) and Capacity Decisions

-$90,000Market unfavorable (.6)

Market favorable (.4)$100,000

Large plant

Market favorable (.4)

Market unfavorable (.6)

$60,000

-$10,000

Medium plant

Market favorable (.4)

Market unfavorable (.6)

$40,000

-$5,000

Small plant

$0

Do nothing

Page 58: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 58

Expected Monetary Value Expected Monetary Value (EMV) and Capacity Decisions(EMV) and Capacity Decisions

-$90,000Market unfavorable (.6)

Market favorable (.4)$100,000

Large plant

Market favorable (.4)

Market unfavorable (.6)

$60,000

-$10,000

Medium plant

Market favorable (.4)

Market unfavorable (.6)

$40,000

-$5,000

Small plant

$0

Do nothing

EMV = (.4)($100,000) + (.6)(-$90,000)

Large Plant

EMV = -$14,000

Page 59: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 59

Expected Monetary Value Expected Monetary Value (EMV) and Capacity Decisions(EMV) and Capacity Decisions

-$90,000Market unfavorable (.6)

Market favorable (.4)$100,000

Large plant

Market favorable (.4)

Market unfavorable (.6)

$60,000

-$10,000

Medium plant

Market favorable (.4)

Market unfavorable (.6)

$40,000

-$5,000

Small plant

$0

Do nothing

-$14,000

$13,000

$18,000

Page 60: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 60

Strategy-Driven InvestmentStrategy-Driven Investment

Operations may be responsible for return-on-investment (ROI)

Analyzing capacity alternatives should include capital investment, variable cost, cash flows, and net present value

Page 61: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 61

Net Present Value (NPV)Net Present Value (NPV)

where F = future valueP = present valuei = interest rate

N = number of years

P =F

(1 + i)N

F = P(1 + i)N

In general:

Solving for P:

Page 62: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 62

Net Present Value (NPV)Net Present Value (NPV)

where F = future valueP = present valuei = interest rate

N = number of years

P =F

(1 + i)N

F = P(1 + i)N

In general:

Solving for P:

While this works fine, it is

cumbersome for larger values of N

Page 63: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 63

NPV Using FactorsNPV Using Factors

P = = FXF

(1 + i)N

where X = a factor from Table S7.1 defined as = 1/(1 + i)N and F = future value

Portion of Table S7.1

Year 6% 8% 10% 12% 14%

1 .943 .926 .909 .893 .8772 .890 .857 .826 .797 .7693 .840 .794 .751 .712 .6754 .792 .735 .683 .636 .5925 .747 .681 .621 .567 .519

Page 64: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 64

Present Value of an AnnuityPresent Value of an Annuity

An annuity is an investment which generates uniform equal payments

S = RX

where X = factor from Table S7.2S = present value of a series of uniform annual receiptsR = receipts that are received every year of the life of the investment

Page 65: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 65

Present Value of an AnnuityPresent Value of an Annuity

Portion of Table S7.2

Year 6% 8% 10% 12% 14%

1 .943 .926 .909 .893 .8772 1.833 1.783 1.736 1.690 1.6473 2.676 2.577 2.487 2.402 2.3224 3.465 3.312 3.170 3.037 2.9145 4.212 3.993 3.791 3.605 3.433

Page 66: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 66

Present Value of an AnnuityPresent Value of an Annuity

$7,000 in receipts per for 5 yearsInterest rate = 6%

From Table S7.2X = 4.212

S = RXS = $7,000(4.212) = $29,484

Page 67: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 67

LimitationsLimitations

1. Investments with the same NPV may have different projected lives and salvage values

2. Investments with the same NPV may have different cash flows

3. Assumes we know future interest rates

4. Payments are not always made at the end of a period

Page 68: S7 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 Capacity and Constraint Management PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S7 - 68

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,

recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America.