s. daniel park soohng.park@samsung
DESCRIPTION
DHCP Option for Configuring IPv6-in-IPv4 Tunnels DHC WG – 59 th IETF. S. Daniel Park [email protected]. Background. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
DHCP Option for Configuring IPv6-in-IPv4 Tunnels<draft-daniel-dhc-ipv6in4-opt-01>
DHC WG – 59th IETF
S. Daniel [email protected]
59th IETF – DHC WG , Seoul
Background
• This DHCPv4 option allows a dual host to bootstrap itself into a disconnected IPv6 infrastructure – for example, a dual-stack host on an IPv4-only link.
• to provide configured tunnel end point automatically• for the simple configured tunnel
• for the IPv4/6 dual host
59th IETF – DHC WG , Seoul
Overview
IPv4/6
IPv4 IPv6
IPv4
Code Length CTEP Order in Sequence
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| OPTION_CTEP | Len | CTEP Addr1 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| CTEP Addr 1 | Subnet Mask 1 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Subnet Mask 1 | CTEP Addr 2 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| CTEP Addr 2 | Subnet Mask 2 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Subnet Mask 2 |. . .
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
IPv6-in
-IPv4
IPv6
IPv6 connectivity
59th IETF – DHC WG , Seoul
Comments from ML
• What exactly is the subnet mask used for ? - Bernie
• IPv6 network information – Bernie• IPv4 address of the tunnel endpoint• IPv6 address and prefix-length for the IPv6 network reachable
• The receiving host encapsulates and forwards any IPv6 datagrams that match the IPv6 prefix in an IPv4 datagram sent to the IPv4 tunnel endpoint address. - Ralph
• Ambiguous word – Bernie• IPv6-in-IPv4 vs IPv6-over-IPv4
• Are the prefix length and prefix really needed ? - Bernie
59th IETF – DHC WG , Seoul
Changes from 00
• not published because of cutoff. It will be available soon
• added Multiple Tunnel End Point Considerations section to clarify how both single TEP and multiple TEP are considered… • generally single TEP is used for IPv6 connectivity and all packet
are reached to the same point
• in multiple TEP, the routes will be tried in a round robin fashion if an host load-sharing is honored
• accepted as WG Item ?