s-72.3270 coverage planning mika

Upload: paola-nomas-dicen

Post on 14-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    1/22

    1

    Coverage planning exercise

    M.Sc. Mika Husso

    16.2.2007

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    2/22

    2

    Last time we discussed

    Capacity planning

    How much traffic offered and how many BSs and

    channels/BS do we need to serve it with the given

    blocking probability (e.g. 1 %)?

    Micro and macro cells

    When designed an area with multiple regions (e.g. A,

    B, C and D), traffic already served by some region

    should not be served again by the next one planned

    Traffic given in Erlangs [E]

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    3/22

    3

    Coverage planning problem (FDMA/TDMA)

    1. Where to put the cell

    border to fulfill the

    coverage probability

    target with given radio

    link parameters?

    2. How to choose the radiolink parameters to fulfill

    the coverage probability

    target for a given cell

    size?

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    80

    rxP S

    rxP S

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    4/22

    4

    Coverage planning

    Starting points- QoS requirements

    Required SINR (signal-to-interference-and-noise-ratio)

    Coverage propability (e.g. 90 %)

    - Link budget (Prx = Ptx+ Gi - Li)

    Gi = Sum of all gains (antennas, mast-top-amplifier, ) Li= Sum of all losses (radio path, cables, connectors, )

    - Pathloss models to determine radio path loss (examples)

    Okumura-Hata MACROCELLS

    Walfisch-Ikegami MICROCELLS COST231 Lhteenmki INDOOR

    - Propagation environment (indoor, city, rural, )

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    5/22

    5

    Coverage planning process

    1. Choose a suitable path loss model depending on the

    propagation environment (rural, )2. Calculate SFM based on the given values

    - cov. prob. target, path.loss.exp. and SF std.

    3. Calculate how large the cell radius can be so that user

    can have coverage with the given coverage probabilitytarget (e.g. 80 %)- Link bugdet + SFM

    4. Choose the smaller of the capacity and coveragebased cell radiuses

    5. If radius is coverage limited recalculate the traffic in thecell with the new radius and determine the new numberof BSs on the are and traffic channels per BS

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    6/22

    6

    Calculation of SFMExample

    Values that you already have:

    Coverage probability target Fu = 0.9

    Shadow fade standard deviation SM = 6 dB

    Path loss exponent n = 3.2

    -> SM / n = 1.875

    Now, there are two ways to proceed

    1. Reading from a graph

    SFM / SM 0.58 (from the graph on the next slide)

    -> SMF = SM* a = 0.58 * 6 dB 3.5 dB

    2. Calculating using the Q-functionPb 0.72 (from the graph on Slide 10)

    Pb = 1 Q(a) is the coverage prob. at the cell border

    Q(a) 0.28 -> Q-1(0.28) = 0.583 = a

    - >SFM = SM * a = 0.583 * 6 dB = 3.5 dB

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    7/22

    7

    Calculation of SFM

    1.0

    0.8Fu 0.95

    Fu 0.90

    Fu 0.85

    Fu 0.80

    SF

    /n1 1.5 2 2.5

    0

    0.6

    0.4

    0.2

    0.2

    0.4

    1.2

    SFM/SF

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    8/22

    8

    Border coverage prob. from cell cov. prob.

    0.4 0.6 0.8 10.6

    0.65

    0.7

    0.75

    0.8

    0.85

    0.9

    0.95

    1/n = 1.0

    1.1

    1.2

    1.3

    1.4

    1.5

    1.6

    1.7

    1.8

    1.9

    2.0

    2.1

    2.2

    2.3

    2.4

    2.5 /n

    Fu

    1 Pob

    Relationship between average cell coverage probability andcell border coverage probability

    coverage_prob.dsf

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    9/22

    9

    Calculation of the link budget

    To make sure that the received power for both

    MS and BS does not go below sensitivity (e.g. -

    102 dBm) more often than what is defined by

    coverage probability target (e.g. 90 %)

    Shadow Fade Margin (SFM) is later introducedto take into account random additional

    attenuation on the connection caused by fading

    Bigger SFM is needed, if

    Coverage probability target increases (e.g.Fu = 80 % -> 90 %)

    Shadow fade standard deviation increases (e.g. 4 dB -> 6 dB)

    Path loss exponent decreases (e.g. n = 4 -> 3)

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    10/22

    10

    Calculation of the link budget

    Example (Downlink link budget)

    Receiver (MS) sensitivity: -101 dBm

    BS transmit power: 30 dBm

    MS antenna gain: 0 dB

    BS antenna gain: 10 dB

    BS cable + connectors losses: 2 dB BS other losses: 2 dB (duplexer etc.)

    MS other losses: 1 dB

    Radio path loss = 130 dB (depends on the cell radius!)

    Prx,MS = 30 + 0 + 10 2 2 1 130= -95 dBm > -101 dBm

    We have a 6 dB Fade Margin!

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    11/22

    11

    Coverage planning in the assignment

    You already performed preliminary capacityplanning and now you check if coverage can begranted

    1. Excel sheet: Link budget + SFM- Defining the maximum cell radius

    - If radius is capacity limited, the parameter values (antennaheigth etc.) in the link budget should be minimized

    2. Modifiying the preliminary capacity plan forthose regions whose cells have coverage

    limited radiuses- naturally this may also affect traffic served by thesecells in other regions

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    12/22

    12

    Assignment: Link budget calculation (Macrocells)

    Maximum cell size in Region A

    DL frequency fDL 1900 UL frequency fUL 1800

    BS tx power level Pbs_tx 44 MS tx power level Pms_tx 30BS feeder loss MS tx feeder loss Lf_ms_rx 0

    combiner filter Lcomb 4.0 MS tx antenna gain Gms_tx -3

    connectors Lconn 1.5 EIRP 27

    jumpers Ljump 2.5 macrocell path loss

    cable length l 105 path length R 2.55

    cable char. loss 0.0393 BS antenna height hbs 100

    total feeder loss Lf 12.127 MS antenna height hms 1.50BS tx antenna gain Gbs_tx 18 MS ant. correction

    EIRP 49.87 dense city >400 M -0.03

    macrocell path loss city 0.04

    path length R 2.55 suburban 11.98

    BS antenna height hbs 100 rural 32.02

    MS antenna height hms 1.50 actual correction Ahms -0.82MS ant. correction average path loss r400 M -0.03 Slow fade margin as in DL

    city 0.05 SFM 6.05

    suburban 12.15 FFM 0

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    13/22

    13

    Assignment: Link budget calculation (Macrocells)

    rural 32.33 total path loss 148.85

    actual correction Ahms -0.03 BS tx antenna gain Gbs_tx 18

    average path loss r

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    14/22

    14

    Assignment: Link budget calculation (Microcells)

    DL frequency fDL 1900 UL frequency fUL 1800

    BS tx power level Pbs_tx 44 MS tx power level Pms_tx 30

    BS feeder loss MS tx feeder loss Lf_ms_rx

    0

    combiner filter Lcomb 4.0 MS tx antenna gain Gms_tx -3

    connectors Lconn 1.5 EIRP 27

    jumpers Ljump 2.5 microcell path loss

    cable length l 15 path length R 0.559

    cable char. loss 0.0393 BS antenna height hbs 10

    total feeder loss Lf 8.59 MS antenna height hms 1.60

    BS tx antenna gain Gbs_tx 12 roof height hr 20.00

    EIRP 47.41 street width w 25.00

    microcell path loss building distance b 200.00

    path length R 0.559 free space loss 92.55

    BS antenna height hbs 10.00 street diffr.loss 26.97

    MS antenna height hms 1.60 multi screen diffr 26.45

    roof height hr 20.00 average path loss r>0.5 km 145.97

    street width w 25.00 SFM as in DL

    building distance b 200.00 SFM -0.75

    free space loss 93.02 FFM 0street diffr.loss 27.20 total path loss 145.22

    multi screen diffr 26.92 BS tx antenna gain Gbs_tx 12

    average path loss r>0.5 km 147.15 BS feeder loss

    Slow fade margin SFM connectors Lconn 1.5

    PLE 4.55 umpers Ljump 2.5

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    15/22

    15

    Assignment: Link budget calculation (Macrocells)

    free space loss 93.02 FFM 0

    street diffr.loss 27.20 total path loss 145.22

    multi screen diffr 26.92 BS tx antenna gain Gbs_tx 12average path loss r>0.5 km 147.15 BS feeder loss

    Slow fade margin SFM connectors Lconn 1.5

    PLE 4.55 jumpers Ljump 2.5

    S 6.00 cable length l 15

    SF/n 1.319 cable char. loss 0.0383

    Fu 0.80 total feeder loss Lf 4.57

    SFM -0.75 BS diversity gain 5

    FFM 0 BS rx level -105.80

    total path loss 146.40 mast top amplifier

    MS rx antenna gain Gms_rx -3 mta gain 10

    MS rx feeder loss 0 mta noise figure 2

    MS rx level -101.99 bs rx noise figure 8

    MS sensitivity -102 mta effective gain 7.40DL_margin 0.01 BS rx level with mta -98.40

    BS sensitivity -104

    DL_UL power balance 1.81 UL_margin -1.80

    DL_UL pwr bal with mta -5.59 UL_margin with mta 5.60

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    16/22

    16

    Observations from the calculation of maximum cell size due

    to coverage requirements

    Region A

    microcells

    Region A

    macrocells

    Region B

    macrocells

    Region C

    macrocells

    Region D

    macrocells

    Capacity

    based cell

    radius1.004 km 2.96 km 1.59 km 3.73 km 28.28 km

    Coverage

    based cellradius

    0.559 km 2.55 km 2.56 km 6.16 km 24.33 km

    Used cell

    radius 0.5 km* 1.59 km** 1.59 km 3.73 km 21.21 km**

    * The sites must can be matched to block size and full coverage

    ** This value is fitted to not give coverage outside Regions A and D

    Despite of using maximum equipment parameters, the macro cell size in

    Region A and D and microcell size in Region A must be reduced.

    This leads to a revision of the ca acit lans for these Re ions

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    17/22

    17

    Modified cell plan to meet cov. requirements

    (Region A)

    B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7

    B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 B13 B14

    B15 B16 B17 B18 B19 B20 B21

    B22 B23 B24 B25 B27 B28B26

    B29 B30 B31 B32 B33 B34 B35

    B36 B37 B38 B39B40

    B41 B42 B43 B44 B45

    0.48 km

    0.48 km = 5 - 2x2.26 km

    0.82 km

    0.82 km =7x2.2615 km15x15 km

    2

    A1 A2

    A3 A4

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    18/22

    18

    Modified cell plan

    Region A is now covered with four omnidirectional macrocells. Taking the

    total offered traffic determined in the capacity planning phase, the offeredtraffic in each cell will be 38.8 4 9.7 Erlang/cellT 16 TRXs in the FDMA-system giving a capacity of 9.83 ErlangThe cell size is the same as in Region B 1.59AR km

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    19/22

    19

    Summary of modified capacity planning results

    Region T Ncell NBS R/km NTCH Timpl

    Amacro

    47.538.8* 1.93 4 1.59

    416=64 39.3A

    micro

    250.0 12.41 60 0.742 403+202=160 337.0B 792.0 39.31 45 1.59 3228+1224+120=1204 857.5C 919.9

    903.0* 44.81 55 3.734028+1420+112=1412 997.1

    D 153.9

    151.4* 7.51 15 21.211220+116+212=280 181.2

    Total 1913.3

    +250.0

    119

    +91

    2960+640, 740+160 TRX 2412.1

    * Traffic originated from overlapping coverage from cells in adjacent

    Regions has been subtracted

    The lower right corner is uncovered, but can be served from macrocells

    Equipment parameters in Region A macrocell base stations (TDMA)

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    20/22

    20

    Summary of coverage planning

    Coverage planning results for the TDMA-system

    Subregionand type

    R/km GBS/dBi feed/" hBS/m PBS/dBm

    PMS/dBm

    mast-top

    amp.

    pwrbal.

    P/dBA, macro 1.59 18.0 1 1/4 30.0 41.81 29.92 no 0.01B 1.59 18.0 1 1/4 30.0 41.74 29.85 no +0.01

    C 3.73 18.0 7/8 30.0 43.42 23.65 yes 0.01D 21.21 18.0 1 5/8 65.0 44.00 24.20 yes 0.01A, micro 0.500 9.0 7/8 10.0 42.12 29.92 no 0.00

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    21/22

    21

    Coverage planning summarized

    1. Based on preliminary capacity plan and QoS

    requirements

    2. Calculation of SFM and link budget based on coverage

    probability target and other given parameters

    3. Modifiying the values obtained from the capacity

    planning process if necessary (coverage based cellradius < capacity based cell radius)

    -> More cells (BSs) to cover the area

    4. Optimizing the parameter values (antenna height,

    antenna gain, feeder type etc.)

  • 7/30/2019 S-72.3270 Coverage Planning Mika

    22/22

    22

    About the assignment

    Assignment will be published after the last

    exercise Introduction to the assignment

    Will be done in 1-2 persons teams

    There will be two deadlines, one of which you

    have to choose depending on when you wish toget your grade

    First DL at the end of the 4. study period

    Second DL somewhere in August

    Grades will come a few weeks after the DL