rv 2014: community engagement and corridor development initiative

39
Providing a framework for higher density affordable housing and mixed-use development along transportation corridors Gretchen Nicholls – Twin Cities LISC Corridor Development Initiative

Upload: railvolution

Post on 02-Jul-2015

224 views

Category:

Business


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Community Engagement + Corridor Development Initiative = Results After a difficult development project review process, have you ever wished there was a better way? Now there is. Learn about the Corridor Development Initiative (CDI) in this interactive workshop. Discover how neighbors can guide redevelopment to reflect their community vision -- how developers can reduce the amount of time between submitting a proposal and breaking ground. Join LISC Twin Cities to see how CDI's hands-on, win-win approach moves potential TOD opportunity sites into actual projects. CDI has been replicated by the Chicago Metropolitan Planning Council and is being considered by the Denver Regional Council of Governments. Hear why CDI has become a best practice in the Twin Cities and whether it might be right for your organization. Gretchen Nicholls, Program Officer, Local Initiatives Support Corporation, St. Paul, Minnesota Barbara Raye, Director, Center for Planning, Policy and Performance, St. Paul, Minnesota Yonah Freemark, Project Manager, Metropolitan Planning Council, Chicago, Illinois Ashley Kaade, AICP, Planner II, Stakeholder Engagement, Denver Regional Council of Governments, Denver, Colorado

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

Providing a framework for higher density affordable housing and mixed-use development

along transportation corridors

Gretchen Nicholls – Twin Cities LISC

Corridor Development Initiative

Page 2: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative
Page 3: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative
Page 4: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

Panel Presenters• Barbara Raye – Twin Cities CDI Tech

Team (Center for Policy Planning and Performance)

• Yonah Freemark – Chicago Metropolitan Planning Coucil

• Ashley Kaade – Denver Regional Council of Governments

Page 5: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

CDI Block Exercise

Katie Thering – CDI Block Exercise Coordinator

Miranda Walker (Aeon) & Bill Beard (The Beard Group) – Financial Analysis

Table facilitators and sketchers

Page 6: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

An interactive exercise for community members to explore different development options and find out if the are financially viable.

Block Exercise: What it is

Page 7: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

Corridor Development Initiative Community Workshops:

Workshop IGathering Information

Workshop IIBlock Exercise

Workshop IVFraming the Recommendations

Workshop IIIDeveloper Panel

Page 8: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

CDI Technical Team

Coordination

Facilitation

Development Design

Page 9: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

Proactive Planning

Production

Partnerships

Page 10: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

Twin Cities LISCCorridor Development InitiativeBarbara RayeCenter for Policy Planning and Performance

Rail-Volution ConferenceSeptember 23, 2014

Page 11: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

Goals and Outcomes1. Connect higher density housing and jobs to

transportation corridors• links vision with market realities

2. Energize collaborative planning among neighborhoods, city, and county partners

• Build relationships• Align planning efforts

3. Production of new development along corridors• Meets city goals and neighborhood interests• Integrates affordable housing options• Physically enhance neighborhoods

Page 12: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

CDI Principles

Stopping Co-Creation

Community members:* Set the stage for future development * Become wiser consumers of development* Become partners with redevelopment efforts

Page 13: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

Greater Efficiency & Better Outcomes• Development that better meets community needs /

expectations• Greater community support• Community has relationship with development, can be

allies / advocates for the project• City / Government has tool for RFP or site plan review in

advance of proposal• Quicker process of plan review – fewer surprises – less

resistance

Page 14: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

Critical Elements• Discuss community values / concerns• Experience of building to values framework: learn

considerations, costs, trade-offs, etc.• Expand viewpoint – learn from other perspectives

• Articulate values and goals

Page 15: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

Benefits

• More knowledgeable about development• Accommodate diverse opinions through listening /

dialogue / collaboration• Identify how investments can benefit broader community• Government reflects community desires – gains

confidence / trust of voters• Developer has a positive start – avoids pitfalls and

knows key issues in advance• Development has long term support from community and

meets genuine community needs• Residents experience positive process for influence and

have new mindset about citizenship

Page 16: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

• Communities are not classrooms• Experts on tap, not experts on top• Translate terminology• Change is natural evolution of past and future• Ground discussion in shared values

Lessons Learned

Page 17: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

Lessons Learned (continued)• Connect vision with financial realities• Strengthen design and development literacy• Use local images • Neutral facilitator essential

Page 18: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

Conclusion

“The Corridor Development Initiative provides a great education to community members, makes visions

more concrete, increases comfort with housing options and provides a venue for community members

to work together to identify their goals.”

Amy Sparks, St. Anthony Park Community

“The Corridor Development Initiative gets residents

meaningfully engaged in shaping the future of their neighborhoods. Any community looking for a new

way to resolve controversial neighborhood redevelopment and infill issues should consider using

this as a model,”

APA Awards Jury Chair Carol Rhea.

Page 19: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

metroplanning.org @metroplanners

Page 20: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

metroplanning.org @metroplanners

Page 21: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

metroplanning.org @metroplanners

Page 22: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

metroplanning.org @metroplanners

Page 23: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

metroplanning.org @metroplanners

Page 24: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

metroplanning.org @metroplanners

Page 25: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

metroplanning.org @metroplanners

Page 26: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

metroplanning.org @metroplanners

Page 27: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

metroplanning.org @metroplanners

Page 28: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

metroplanning.org @metroplanners

Page 29: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

metroplanning.org @metroplanners

Page 30: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative
Page 31: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

Non-profit, public agency dedicated to serving local governments

Local officials working together to address the region’s challenges

Each community has a voice in regional decision making

Program areas:- Advocacy - Regional growth and development

- Aging Services - Shared services

- Environment - Transportation and traffic operation

Page 32: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

Sustainable Communities Initiative (SCI)

- Build out of FasTracks

Metro Vision 2040

Page 33: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

Commitment to stakeholder engagement

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Housing, infill, urban centers
Page 34: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

Metro Vision

- Urban Centers

- Infill development and redevelopment

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Housing, infill, urban centers Active, pedestrian-, bicycle-, and transit-friendly More dense and mixed in use 103 designated urban centers in the DRCOG region Do you envision the center remaining stable or transition to different uses, forms, or densities over the next 5-10 years? 65% said transition
Page 35: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

Infill and redevelopment desired and critical

Challenges and barriers

Strategic coordination between the public and private sector is necessary

A clear vision with planning policies that support the vision are important

Presenter
Presentation Notes
can increase the range of housing choices available within proximity of transit and other existing amenities Challenges: Land use restrictions as a barrier Colorado Construction Defects Legislation Remaining sites can be challenged Key challenges -- Inconsistency with local comprehensive plans Lack of advanced planning and organizational support Land use regulations as a barrier Remaining sites tend to be “challenged” Infrastructure costs Market and feasibility limitations Construction defects legislation
Page 36: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

Sites that have had extensive planning and outreach are most attractive to developers

Issues arise when major site considerations have not yet been vetted through the political process (e.g., utilities, roadway access, station integration)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Lack of Advanced Planning and Organizational Support
Page 37: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

SCI Catalytic Projects

Metro Vision 2040

Infill Feasibility Plans

Photo credit: PlaceMatters

Page 38: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG)Ashley J. Kaade, AICP Planner II: Stakeholder [email protected]: www.drcog.org

Page 39: RV 2014: Community Engagement and Corridor Development Initiative

Sign up to bring theCorridor Development Initiative

to YOUR community

Gretchen Nicholls, Twin Cities [email protected]

651-265-2280www.tclisc.org/twin_cities/grants_loans

/corridor.php