ruthellen josselson, ph.d.. “there is no method capable of being learned and systematically...

18
ANALYSIS IN QUALITATIVE INQUIRY Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D.

Upload: gwen-garrison

Post on 16-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D.. “There is no method capable of being learned and systematically applied so that it leads to the goal. The scientist has to

ANALYSIS IN QUALITATIVE INQUIRY

Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D.

Page 2: Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D.. “There is no method capable of being learned and systematically applied so that it leads to the goal. The scientist has to

“There is no method capable of being learned and systematically applied so that it leads to the goal. The scientist has to worm general principles out of nature by perceiving in comprehensive complexes of empirical facts certain general features which permit of precise formulation.”---Albert Einstein

Page 3: Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D.. “There is no method capable of being learned and systematically applied so that it leads to the goal. The scientist has to

DISCOVERY

prediction (whether, to what extent in regard to difference) vs. meanings(process and causality)

Page 4: Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D.. “There is no method capable of being learned and systematically applied so that it leads to the goal. The scientist has to

"an interpretive science in search of meaning not an experimental science in search of lawas" (Geertz, 1973, p.5)

"man is an animal suspended in webs of significance he himself has spun"

From Clifford Geertz

Page 5: Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D.. “There is no method capable of being learned and systematically applied so that it leads to the goal. The scientist has to

Big Q question – the conceptual context

Little Q question – near to experience

Page 6: Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D.. “There is no method capable of being learned and systematically applied so that it leads to the goal. The scientist has to

INDUCTION

ABDUCTION

Page 7: Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D.. “There is no method capable of being learned and systematically applied so that it leads to the goal. The scientist has to

What others have seen: The literature review and conceptual context

The “method” – how you will inquire

What you see – what the texts say

The interpretation: What you make of it all.

Page 8: Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D.. “There is no method capable of being learned and systematically applied so that it leads to the goal. The scientist has to

HOLISTIC – CONTENT

HOLISTIC-FORM

CATEGORICAL –CONTENT

CATEGORICAL-FORM

Page 9: Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D.. “There is no method capable of being learned and systematically applied so that it leads to the goal. The scientist has to

From Five Ways of Doing Qualitative Analysis PHENOMENOLOGICAL ANALYSIS-Fred WertzGROUNDED THEORY-Kathy CharmazDISCOURSE ANALYSIS -Linda McMullenNARRATIVE ANALYSIS- Ruthellen JosselsonINTUITIVE INQUIRY-Rosemarie Anderson

Page 10: Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D.. “There is no method capable of being learned and systematically applied so that it leads to the goal. The scientist has to

1) Read for the plota) Attend to what is happening: Where are we? What are the stories being told?b) Attend to repeated images and metaphorsc) Attend to dominant themesd) Note contradictions and absences

2) What are the multiple contexts in which these stories are embedded?

Page 11: Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D.. “There is no method capable of being learned and systematically applied so that it leads to the goal. The scientist has to

3) The listener’s/reader’s response to the interview

a)Identify your own thoughts and feelingsWhat are your associations to the narrative? What is your emotional response to the person and interview? b)What is your social location in relation to the participant? c) How might your response affect your understanding of the person and the stories being told? How does your response help you understand the narrative?

 

Page 12: Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D.. “There is no method capable of being learned and systematically applied so that it leads to the goal. The scientist has to

ABSTRACT – summary of the story to come ORIENTATION – introduces person, place,

time COMPLICATING ACTION – what happened EVALUATION – what is significant about the

story; how it is to be understood RESOLUTION/CODA - return to the present

From the work of Labov and Waletzky

Page 13: Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D.. “There is no method capable of being learned and systematically applied so that it leads to the goal. The scientist has to

MARKERS OF SALIENCE IN NARRATIVE TEXTS

Based on Alexander, I. (1990). Personology: Method and Content in Personality Assessment and Psychobiography. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.

Page 14: Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D.. “There is no method capable of being learned and systematically applied so that it leads to the goal. The scientist has to

Primacy: What comes first has a particular importance because

it came first to the mind of the narrator and introduces and frames the narrative.

Frequency That which is repeated must have some particular

meaning. Incompletion

An obvious form of incompletion occurs when an expository sequence begins, follows a course, but ends before closure is reached. Or, there can be discontinuities in the narrative even when closure is reached.

Page 15: Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D.. “There is no method capable of being learned and systematically applied so that it leads to the goal. The scientist has to

Uniqueness This may be pointed out by the participant as something unusual. More subtle are the signs of uniqueness that arise from either differences in expression from those commonly held in the general language, or more importantly, clear departures from the usual language expressed by the subject.

Negation: Pay attention to narration that declare what is NOT or what the participant did NOT think or feel. The idea being negated still comes from the participant and we can wonder what is being negated and why.

Page 16: Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D.. “There is no method capable of being learned and systematically applied so that it leads to the goal. The scientist has to

OmissionWe might think about what is being left out of the narrative and why this might be. Ideally, this would be inquired about at the time of interview, but it can still be considered on analysis.

 Emphasis:

Something is called to our attention deliberately by the teller, e.g., “I want you to know that . . .,” or “A critical event in my life was . . .,” or other obvious forms of accent or underlining.”

Page 17: Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D.. “There is no method capable of being learned and systematically applied so that it leads to the goal. The scientist has to

Error: Slips of the tongue or distortionsmay indicate important, hidden motives.

Page 18: Ruthellen Josselson, Ph.D.. “There is no method capable of being learned and systematically applied so that it leads to the goal. The scientist has to

Listening/reading/ interpretive communities:

Read within listening communities of multiple listeners – exploring the different connections, resonances, and interpretations that each listener naturally brings to the analytic process.