rss oct 2011 mixed modes pres3
DESCRIPTION
The Role of Visual and AuralCommunication in Producing ModeEffects on Answers to SurveyQuestionsTRANSCRIPT
1
RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
The Role of Visual and Aural Communication in Producing Mode Effects on Answers to Survey Questions
Peter Lynn1, Steven Hope2, Annette Jäckle1, Pamela Campanelli3,
Gerry Nicolaas4
1 ISER, University of Essex2 University College London3 Independent Survey Methods Consultant4 National Centre for Social Research
1/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
Channels of Communication
In surveys, communication is primarily via sight (visual) and sound
(aural), of different forms and in different combinations
The nature of communication can affect:
• Comprehension
• Retrieval from memory
• Judgement
• Response
Via task difficulty - affecting whether the effort made is sufficient
Via context - affecting question processing
(Jäckle et al presentation)
2
2/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
Communication in Different Survey Modes
• Telephone surveys: communication is usually restricted to aural
form;
• Postal surveys: communication is restricted to visual form;
• Web surveys: usually just visual, but sometimes aural too;
• Face-to-face: both visual and aural
Administering Survey Items
The administration of a survey item has three main components:
• Asking the question;
• Offering response options;
• Receiving the answer.
Channels of communication can differ between items in a survey and
between components of an item.
Example: From the respondent’s perspective, a question in CAPI,
using a show card, involves these channels of communication:
Aural: respondent hears the question spoken by the interviewer;
Visual: respondent reads the response options on the card;
Oral: respondent speaks his/her response to the interviewer.
3/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
3
Our General Hypotheses I
H1. Visual rather than aural presentation of a survey question or
response options tends to increase the propensity that a
respondent will correctly understand the question
H2. Visual rather than aural presentation tends to reduce the
propensity that a respondent will take short cuts in responding due
to satisficing
4/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
Our General Hypotheses II
H1b, H2b. Effects on understanding or shortcutting will be mediated
by the cognitive ability and motivation of the respondent.
Specifically, visual rather than aural presentation will have positive
effects (better understanding; less shortcutting) for respondents of
higher ability and motivation and negative effects for respondents of
lower ability and motivation.
H1c, H2c. Effects on understanding or shortcutting will be mediated by
characteristics of the question. Specifically, positive effects of visual
presentation will be confined to questions that are relatively difficult
or burdensome and will be stronger for non-factual questions that
factual ones;
5/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
4
Our Study
4 sets of experimental manipulations, each involving between 1 and 6
survey questions.
Collectively, experiments address our hypotheses
6/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
Experiment 1
Visual vs. Aural Communication of Response Options in
CAPI
Randomised experiment, with and without show cards
Face to face interviews in respondents’ homes
6 items: 4 factual and 2 satisfaction
Satisfaction items: 7-category, ordinal
Factual items: 7-cat ordinal, 8-cat ordinal, 7-cat nominal, 8-cat nominal
7/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
5
Experiment 1: Methods
Logistic regression with controls for variables predictive of unit non-
response (sex, age, economic status, marital status, ethnic group)
Dependent variables:
a) Indicator of choice of middle or extreme categories (satisficing)
b) Indicator of choice of first n (primacy) or last n (recency) categories
presented (n = 1, 2 or 3 depending on question and response
distribution)
Tested main effect of treatment and interactions with:
a) Cognitive ability indicators (age and education level)
b) Motivation indicator (interviewer perception)
8/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
Experiment 1: Results
Visual communication (show card) reduced shortcutting (H2):
• Fewer middle/extreme responses for 1 of 2 satisfaction items
• Fewer first categories for 3 of 6 items
Interactions with cognitive ability and motivation (H2b):
• For one item (monthly expenditure on leisure activities), the
reduction in primacy was restricted to respondents aged under 65;
• For one item (proximity of features to home), Visual
communication increased primacy for less motivated respondents
Dependency on question characteristics (H2c):
• Effects observed for 2/2 difficult factual Qs, 0/2 easy factual, 1/2
non-factual
9/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
6
Experiment 2
Visual vs. Aural Communication of Question and Response
Options (CAWI vs CATI)
Same 6 items: 4 factual and 2 satisfaction
Web has only visual communication; CATI has only aural
communication
Note that both modes also have communication of the question in the
same mode as the response options (unlike experiment 1)
Interviewer ‘presence’ can also affect the CATI responses, but effect
likely to be weaker than for face-to-face, so it is possible that the
effect of channel of communication is the dominant one
Methods same as experiment 1
10/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
Experiment 2: Results
Visual communication (CAWI) and shortcutting (H2):
• No main effect;
Interactions with cognitive ability and motivation (H2b):
• Shortcutting increased for respondents without qualifications only
(1 Q, middle+extremes) and for less motivated respondents (1 Q,
primacy)
Dependency on question characteristics (H2c):
• No support for H2c: effects found were for 1/2 difficult and 1/2
easy factual Qs
11/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
7
Spend on Leisure Activities
12/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
< £20 < £40 < £60 < £80 < £100 < £120 < £140
CATI
CAWI
Experiment 3
Visual Communication of Response Options in CAWI
One item with end-labelled 10-point scale
Version one: ten radio buttons, displayed linearly
Version two: number box
13/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
8
A. On a scale of 1 to 5, with one being
very satisfied and 5 being very
dissatisfied, how satisfied are you with
the classes you are taking this
semester?
�1 Very Satisfied
�2
�3
�4
�5 Very Dissatisfied
B. On a scale of 1 to 5, with one
being very satisfied and 5 being
very dissatisfied, how satisfied are
you with the classes you are taking
this semester?
Number of your rating
Evidence that 10% of people changed their answer on B because they had
forgotten the direction of the scale! Further evidence that others answering B who
had forgotten the direction of the scale, did not realise their mistake.
Christian and Dillman, 2004
14/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
Experiment 3: Version 1
15/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
9
Experiment 3: Version 2
16/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
Experiment 3: Methods
Our specific hypotheses are that visual presentation (radio buttons)
will produce:
• Less shortcutting, indicated by middle or extreme categories;
• Better understanding, indicated by internal validity (correlations);
• Greater use of categories 2 to 9.
Methods:
• Logistic regression with controls as before. Dependent variables
are a) indicator of choice of middle or extreme categories,
b) indicator of choice of categories 2 to 9
• Comparison of correlations with conceptually-related Qs
17/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
10
Experiment 3: Results
Visual communication (radio buttons) brought:
Less shortcutting (H2);
More choice of options 2 to 9;
Greater validity (H1) (significantly higher correlations for 5 of 9 items,
though lower correlation for 1 item);
Increase in validity was for respondents with both high and low
cognitive ability and motivation (H2b):
18/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
Experiment 4
Visual vs. Aural Communication of Response Options for
End-labelled Scales (CAPI with show card vs CATI)
Four items with end-labelled scales: response task similar to experiment 3
All scales had 7 points
2 satisfaction questions and 2 difficult factual questions
Hypotheses and methods same as for experiment 3
19/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
11
Experiment 4: Results
Visual communication and shortcutting (H2):
• Less shortcutting with visual (CAPI) – significant for one item,
borderline for one (P = 0.08), consistent direction for all 4;
Mediation by question characteristics (H2c):
• Effects for two difficult factual items, not for non-factual items;
Use of options 2 to 9:
• Greater with visual (CAPI) for one item (other 3 no difference);
Visual communication and validity (H1):
• For 3 items, not possible to identify correlated items; for 4th item,
lower correlation with visual (CAPI).
20/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
Summary
Visual communication and respondent understanding (H1):
• Strong support from expt 3 (CAWI); no support from expt 4 (CAPI
vs CATI)
Visual communication and shortcutting (H2):
• Modest or strong support from all 4 expts;
Mediation by cognitive ability and motivation (H1b, H2b):
• Support from expts 1, 2, 4; no support from expt 3;
Mediation by question characteristics (H1c, H2c): :
• Indicative support from expts 1 & 4; no support from expt 2
21/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
12
Conclusions and Implications
• Visual communication can aid understanding and full processing;
• But only for respondents of higher ability and motivation;
• And effects may be noticeable only for difficult/ complex questions.
For surveys of high-ability respondents, visual may be preferable
For surveys with only simple questions, channel of communication
may not affect measurement
For surveys of respondents with a range of abilities, and including
some difficult/complex questions, it may be preferable to utilise
both visual and aural channels, e.g.
• CAPI: Show cards and interviewer read out, when appropriate
• A-CASI / A-CAWI with question text displayed
22/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
Discussion I
Use of Show Cards
• We know little about how and when respondents process them and how
this influences measurement
• We don’t know how best to control the use of cards
Dual-channel Communication
• We know little about how respondents process such stimuli:
• Respondents may give primary attention to one channel;
• They may switch between channels;
• Processing behaviour may vary between respondents and, in particular,
be associated with cognitive ability, vision, hearing, etc;
• All of which may produce response effects
23/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
13
Discussion II
And for a better understanding of the role of cognitive ability and other
relevant between-respondent differences:
• Better measures of cognitive ability and motivation in mode
experiments;
• Measures of hearing and vision;
• Control of these features through design.
We should perhaps not be asking ourselves which channel is better/best,
but how best to combine them
24/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
Cognitive Interview ResultsExperiment 1: Showcard Effects (1)• Of the 6 questions tested, the best example of a primacy effect on the
aural (no show card version) was for expenditure on leisure activities
(except eating out)
• For the cognitive interviewing an additional question on “expenditure on
eating out” was added
• One group received the leisure activities question first, the other group
received that eating out question first
• For both groups, the first question did not have a show card and the
second one did
• Main focus on expenditure on leisure activities
25/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
14
Cognitive Interview ResultsExperiment 1: Showcard Effects (2)
• Note first category was lowest value
• There were misunderstandings of the question. Themes
observed:
• Some Rs incorrectly thinking about family expenditure rather than
personal expenditure
• Some Rs incorrectly including eating out
• Thus Rs answering the question correctly would have much lower
expenditures
• The ‘average month’ part of the question was occasionally missed:
• One respondent actually answered about a week and thus had very
small expenditure
26/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
Cognitive Interview ResultsExperiment 1: Showcard Effects (3)
• These confusions, although affecting the final category
chosen by Rs did not appear to explain the show card effect
as Rs who had had the show card reported similar
confusions.
• But when asked, “How did you find it when you had a card
compared to when you did not have a card?” the majority of
respondents clearly preferred the use of a card.
27/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
15
End-Labelled Scales(only tested in CAPI and CATI in cognitive interviews)
28/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
Survey Questions Used – End-Labelled Versions
Satisfaction Questions - Common
• Difficult: Satisfaction with democracy and personal freedom in Great
Britain (where 1 is very satisfied and 7 is very dissatisfied) - from ESS,
2006 (with addition of ‘and personal freedom’ to make the question more
difficult)
• Easy: Satisfaction with state of the economy in Great Britain (where 1 is
very satisfied and 7 is very dissatisfied) - from ESS, 2006
Behavioural Frequency Questions - Uncommon
• Difficult: Frequency of hot beverages purchased outside the home (where
0 is none and more than 25 is 6) – newly developed to fit hypotheses
• Easy question, but difficult due to scale: Frequency of grocery
shopping (where 1 is every day and 7 is never) – newly developed to fit
hypotheses
29/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
16
Aural delivery and confusion of direction of scale –
Experiment 4
30/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
Cognitive Interview Findings
• Support for Christian and Dillman (2004).
Although both CAPI and CATI Rs spontaneously
mentioned that they would have liked to have had
labels on all the categories, there is evidence
from respondent comments that the lack of visual
aid in CATI made the questions more difficult than
in CAPI.
In line with the findings of Christian and Dillman
(2004), a few Rs did confuse the direction of the
scale (slightly more in CATI than CAPI).
31/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
17
Middle Categorieson End-Labelled Scales –Other analyses
32/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
Middle Categories on End-labelled Scales - Quantitative
• Tables in Dillman & Christian (2005) show a higher percentage
of middle category answers in the end-labelled format than fully
labelled format
• Same pattern on attitudinal and behavioural questions in Mixed
Modes data
• Except for state of the economy - Respondents in both
formats and all modes gave economy a bad rating
• The middle category effect less in CATI
33/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
18
Cognitive Interview Findings
• How easy or difficult is it to choose the middle category on an
aural end-labelled scale? (This was explored through cognitive
probing.)
Although roughly equal numbers said easy and difficult, only a
third of Rs could correctly identify the mid-point!
True for the 7-point satisfaction scales (correct answer is 4: Rs
also said 3, 3.5, 3 or 4)
Larger issue for behavioural frequency ones
– Correct answer for grocery shopping question is 4: Rs also said 3, 3
or 4, between 3 and 4
– Correct answer for hot beverage question is 3: Rs also said 3.5, 3 or
4, 4, 1 or 2
34/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
Other analyses -
Similar Attitudinal and Behavioural
Frequency Distribution
on End-Labelled Scales
35/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
19
Similar Attitudinal and Behavioural Frequency Distribution on End-Labelled Scales - Quantitative
• Dillman & Christian (2005) found a higher percentage of
answers at the top of the scale (more positive answers and higher
mean) in the fully-labelled format than end-labelled (end-labelled
more spread out)
• Replicated in Mixed Modes study on attitudinal and
behavioural questions (except state of the economy).
• Remember middle category pattern on attitudinal and
behavioural questions also replicated Dillman & Christian
(2005) (except state of the economy).
• Given attitudinal and behavioural show such similar
distributions, it would be tempting to say that the same
response process is responsible
36/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
Cognitive Interview Findings (1)
Attitudinal & behavioural questions processed differently
• On satisfaction questions . . .
Rs were using the 1 to 7 scale
Choice of middle category was a way to ‘satisfice’, say ‘don’t know’, or choose a valid option.
• On frequency of grocery shopping question . . .
Some Rs tried to use the scale (1 everyday to 7 never), e.g., everyday is code 1; nearly every day is code 2
‘Once a week’ very difficult to place (answers ranged from 3 to 6!)
Others patterns
– Actual number of days of shopping
– Idiosyncratic methods, e.g., 4 means every 4th day; 5 means twice a
week
37/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
20
Cognitive Interview Findings (2)
• On frequency of hot beverages purchased outside the house . . .
– Rs didn’t use the scale (0 is none and 6 is more than 25);
– Common answer was the actual number of drinks;
– But a few Rs using this strategy became confused. If 5 drinks is code 5 why the large gap with ‘more than 25’ being code 6;
– Some Rs used multiples of 2 or 5.
38/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
Thank You!
39/39 RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
21
Annex
RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
References
Christian, L. M. & Dillman, D.A. (2004) The influence of graphical and symbolic language
manipulations on responses to self-administered questions, Public Opinion Quarterly 68, 57-
80.
Holbrook A L, Krosnick J A, Moore D & Tourangeau R (2007) Response Order Effects in
Dichotomous Categorical Questions Presented Orally. Public Opinion Quarterly 71, 325-348
Stern, M.J., Dillman, D.A. & Smyth, J.D. (2007) Visual design, order effects, and respondent
characteristics in a self-administered survey, Survey Research Methods 1, 121-138.
RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
22
Survey Questions
N39x.
Which of the following is closest to where you live?
READ OUT
A primary school...........................1
A secondary school......................2
A 6th form college.........................3
A river............................................4
A lake............................................5
A cinema.......................................6
Or a theatre...................................7
RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
N43y.
I would like you to tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you are with local household waste
collection, recycling collection and other re-cycling collection points. Would you say you are…
READ OUT
Very satisfied....................................1
Moderately satisfied..........................2
Slightly satisfied................................3
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied......4
Slightly dissatisfied............................5
Moderately dissatisfied......................6
Or very dissatisfied?..........................7
RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
23
N44y
And how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with street cleaning? Would you say you are…
READ OUT
Very satisfied....................................1
Moderately satisfied..........................2
Slightly satisfied................................3
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied......4
Slightly dissatisfied............................5
Moderately dissatisfied......................6
Or very dissatisfied?..........................7
RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
FM75y.
Which of these best describes your home? Would you say a . . .
READ OUT
Detached house..................1
Semi-detached house ........2
Terraced house...................3
Bungalow ...........................4
Flat in a block of flats..........5
Flat in a house.....................6
Maisonette...........................7
Or other? ............................8
RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
24
FM81x.
How much do you personally spend in an average month on leisure activities, and entertainment
and hobbies, other than eating out? Would you say. . .
READ OUT
Less than £20..............1
£20 - £39......................2
£40 - £59 .....................3
£60 - £79 .....................4
£80 - £99......................5
£100 - £119..................6
£120 - £139 .................7
Or £140 or more.?.......8
RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
FM82x. How long have you lived in this area? Would you say. . .
READ OUT
Less than 12 months
12 months or more but less than 2 years
2 years or more but less than 3 years
3 years or more but less than 5 years
5 years or more but less than 10 years
10 years or more but less than 20 years
Or 20 years or longer
RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
25
GB16x. On the whole, how satisfied are you with the way democracy and personal freedom
work in Great Britain? Please look at this card and tell me your answer.
Very Satisfied .......... 1
2
3
4
5
6
Very dissatisfied…....7
RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
GB17x. And on the whole, how satisfied are you with the present state of the economy in Great
Britain? Please look at this card and tell me your answer.
Very Satisfied .......... 1
2
3
4
5
6
Very dissatisfied…....7
RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
26
FM68x.
The next question is about grocery shopping which includes food, drinks, cleaning products,
toiletries and household goods. How often do you personally do grocery shopping? Please
look at this card and tell me your answer.
Every day.................. 1
2
3
4
5
6
Never …….……….....7
RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011
FM74x. In the last two weeks, how many teas, coffees and other hot beverages have you
purchased outside the home? Please look at this card and tell me your answer.
None…........................ 0
1
2
3
4
5
More than 25..................6
RSS Social Statistics Section, 11 October 2011