*1PHSWeeS2 a.5186 KEMP

010

A

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

FOR ASSESSMENT WORK CREDIT

OF THE SIROLA-KARVINEN OPTION

AND NEWMONT CLAIM GROUPS IN

BURROWS AND KEMP TOWNSHIPS,

ONTARIO RECEIVEDOCT 81982

MINING LANDS SSCTION

By

R.P. Bowen, P.Eng. Project Geologist

Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd.

1982

PROJECT 285

A JOINT VENTURE BETWEEN

NEWMONT EXPLORATION OF CANADA LTD.

AND

DU PONT OF CANADA EXPLORATION LTD.

41P14SW0852 2.5106 KEMP 010C

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Qualifications of the writer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi

Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii

Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lHistory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lLocation and access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Recorded holder . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . 5Submitting party ................** 6Claims surveyed and dates of survey.......** 7Physiography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8Natural resources ...............*. 9Wildlife . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11Previous work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

General Geology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28Early Precambrian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

Metavolcanic rocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33Komatiitic metavolcanic rocks . . . . . . . . 34

Peridotitic komatiites . . . . . . . . . . 35Basaltic komatiites . . . . . . . . . . . . 37Carbonatization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

Mafic metavolcanic. rocks (Tholeiiticand Calc-Alkaline) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40Magnesium tholeiites . . . . . . . . . . . 40Iron tholeiites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41Calc-alkaline basalts . . . . . . . . . . . 42

Intermediate metavolcanic rocks(Tholeiitic and Calc-Alkaline) . . . . . . . 43

Felsic metavolcanic rocks (Calc-Alkaline) . . . 44 Metasedimentary rocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

Clastic metasedimentary rocks . . . . . . . . . 45Chemical metasedimentary rocks . . . . . . . . 46

Metamorphosed mafic intrusive rocks . . . . . . . 49Felsic intrusive rocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51

Early, Middle and Late Precambrian maficintrusive rocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52Diabase dikes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . 52

Phanerozoic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * 54Cenozoic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

Quaternary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54Pleistocene and recent . . . . . . . . . . . 54

Structural geology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56

Metamorphism .................. 63

ii

Page

Geochemistry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65

Stratigraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92

Geophysics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95

Economic geology .................... 100

References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116

Geotechnical data sheet. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . 120

iii

TABLES

Page

1 - Burrows Township assessment file data* . . . . . . . . 15

2 - Table of lithologic units- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

3 - Methods of detection and detection limited . . . . . .66

4 - Major element analyses ................67

5 - Minor element analyses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72

6 - Trace element analyses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77

7 - Calculations for Jensen Cation plot. . . . . . . . . . 81

8 - Calculations for AFM diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94

9 - Calculations for ACF diagram . . . . . . . . . . . , . 87

10 - Calculations for A'FK diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . 89

11 - Assay data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103

iv

FIGURES*

Page

1 - Key map showing location of Burrows Township. . . . . 3

2 - Burrows Township claim location map showing claimsheld by Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd.. . . . . . 3

3 - Data Location Map of Burrows Township . . . . . . . . 14

4 - Generalized Geology of Burrows Township . . . . . . . 29

5 - Diagrammatic section of a typical ultramafic flowin Munro Township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

6 - Equal area projection of lineations . . . . . . . . . 57

7 - Equal area projection of poles of foliation planesEast Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56

8 - Equal area projection of poles of foliation planes,North Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59

9 - Equal area projection of poles of foliation planes,South Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60

10 - Equal area projection of poles of joint planes . . . 62

11 - Jensen Cation Plot. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80

12 - AFM Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83

13 - ACF - A'FK Diagram. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86

14 - Regional stratigraphy of the Timmins-Gogama-Matachewan area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94

15 - Aeromagnetic map of Burrows Township. . . . . . . . . 96

MAPS

EAST GROUP GEOLOGY (back pocket)

NORTH GROUP GEOLOGY (back pocket)

SOUTH GROUP GEOLOGY (back pocket)

vi

QUALIFICATIONS OF THE WRITER

EDUCATION:

B.S. Geological Engineering, Michigan-TechnologicalUniversity, 1970.

B.S. Engineering Administration, Michigan TechnologicalUniversity, 1971.

Diploma Geological Science, McGill University, 1972. M.Se. (Applied) Minerals Exploration, McGill University,

1973.

EXPERIENCE:

Summers 1969 - 1973: Ontario Geological Survey.January 1974 - December 1975: Exploration Engineer,

Tenneco Mining Inc^ Lathrop Wells, Nevada.March 1976 - August 1978: Geological Engineer, Rosario

Resources Corp., Toronto, Ontario and Tucson, Arizona.August 1978 - April 1980: Law School and private con

sulting including teaching at Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.

April 1980 - April 1981: Geologist, Ontario Geological Survey, Toronto, Ontario.

May 1981 to present: Project Geologist, Newmont Explo ration of Canada Ltd., Timmins, Ontario.

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:

Society of Mining Engineers of .the .American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and-Petroleum -Engineers.

Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.Prospectors and Developers Association.American Society of Photogrammetry.Society of Economic Geologists.Association of Professional Engineers of the Province of

Ontario.

vi i

ABSTRACT

This report describes the geology and mineral occurrences

on the claims staked by Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd. in

Burrows Township, Ontario. The area is located in NTS area

41P/14 or roughly 47O47'N latitude and 81O25'W longitude or UTM

grid 5292000 m North and 471000 m East.

All rocks are of Early Precambrian age with the possible

exception of some diabase dikes. The bulk of the metavolcanic

rocks are iron and magnesium tholeiite basalts with a number

of thin basaltic komatiitic units. Intermediate and felsic

metavolcanic rocks are largely calc-alkaline in composition.

Numerous chemical metasedimentary units occur along the inter

faces between the various metavolcanic flows. These units may

be iron-rich exhalative units composed mostly of magnetite and

chert, and minor pyrite and pyrrhotite, however, there are

several massive pyrite pyrrhotite with minor chalcopyrite and

sphalerite units found either in outcrop or from diamond drilling.

Economic mineralization will be associated with these rocks, if such

indeed exists in the area.

Intrusive rocks range from gabbro to aplite and occur

as dikes plugs and batholithic complexes.

A major northeast trending synclinal trough is the major

structural feature influencing the minor structural complexities

in the area. The batholith to the west and those further east

have exerted forces causing refolding and warping of the

viii

metavolcfanic sequence.

Regional metamorphism is middle greenschist to lower

almandine-amphibolite facies with contact metamorphism near the

Togo Batholith of albite-epidote-hornfels facies.

No major mines are located in the area and those of the

Shining Tree area to the south have been small, however, the

rock units are representative of both the Kirkland Lake and

Timmins areas which are major gold producers.

- l -

INTRODUCTION

HISTORY

The purpose of this report is to describe in detail the

assessment work performed on the Burrows Township property,

Project 285.

Previous information submitted for assessment work credit

29 January 1982 on the original Sirola-Karvinen option is

included for the sake of continuity. The original Sirola-

Karvinen claim groups were designated the East Claim Group

covering eight claims, numbered L. 550160, 550162 through

550168 inclusive. Work on Newmont claim L. 628518 was

submitted with that report to round out the group. The West

Claim Group covered sixteen claims, numbered L. 547207

through L. 547222 inclusive.

In order to tie the two claim groups together in one

contiguous block and to cover the favorable aeromagnetic

horizon Newmont staked a further one hundred eighteen (118)

claims between 27 July 1981 and 20 July 1982 in Burrows and

Kemp Townships. These latter claims will be the primary

subject of this report.

The claims will be illustrated on three overlapping map

sheets at a scale of 1:5000 metric. The grids over which the

survey was conducted were cut by personnel of Henry T. Gonzalez

Exploration Services Ltd. at 100 meter spacings with pickets

at 25 meter intervals.

- 2 -

LOCATION AND ACCESS

Figure l is a key map showing the relative location of

Burrows Township to Timmins, Gogama and Shiningtree at a scale

of l inch to 50 miles. Burrows Township is roughly 80 kilo

meters south of Timmins and 144 kilometers north of Sudbury.

Burrows Township can be reached from Timmins or Sudbury by

travelling on highway 144 to highway 560 and east about 70

kilometers to the Grassy Lake road. The Grassy Lake road will

reach the Kemp-Burrows township boundary at the north end of Marne

Lake roughly 31 kilometers from highway 560. Travelling south on Pine

Street from Timmins, Burrows Township is roughly 60 kilometers

distant although portions of the road are not well maintained.

Figure 2 is a Burrows Township claim location map showing

the two original claim blocks contained in the Sirola-Karvinen

option agreement, designated East Group and West Group. Also

shown are the claim blocks which are the three contiguous claim

groups submitted for assessment credit in this report and

designated East Group, North Group and South Group in order to

conform with the map sheets.

All claim blocks may be reached by motor vehicle from the

main Grassy Lake road which bisects the property and enters

Cabot Township south of Burrows Township.

Several roads and drivable trails lead to nearly every

claim. Mouse Lake, Little Marne Lake and Marne Lake can be

serviced by float equipped aircraft in the summer and ski

- 4 -

equipped aircraft in the winter. During the winter, snowmobiles

may be used to reach the claims either from highway 560 or from

the Mattagami Indian Reserve No. 71 which is roughly 4 kilometers

west of the western boundary of Burrows Township.

- 5 -

RECORDED HOLDER

The claims are held by Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd.,

license number A-37767, of 33 Yonge St., Suite 370, Toronto,

Ontario. M5E 1T2

- 6 -

SUBMITTING PARTY

Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd. is the submitting party,

All surveys and work was done by Newmont personnel or by

contractors directly supervised by Newmont personnel. The

submitting author was Project Geologist and directly respon

sible for the work done.

- 7 -

CLAIMS SURVEYED AND DATES OF SURVEY

The following one hundred eighteen (118) claims were covered

by line cutting and the geological survey conducted at various

times between October 1981 and July 1982:

Kemp Township

L. 622295 through L. 622303 inclusive

Burrows Township

L. 622304 through L. 622329 inclusive

L. 622240 through L. 622290 inclusive

L. 618941 through L. 618952 inclusive

L. 628514 through L. 628516 inclusive and L. 628519

L. 624494 through L. 624497 inclusive

L. 620953 and L. 620954

L. 634109 through L. 634116 inclusive

L. 643017 and L. 643611

Figure 2 shows the relative layout and location of these

claims.

- 8 -

PHYSIOGRAPHY

The area is low to moderate in relief, generally less than

30m. The sharpest relief is where eskers and sand dunes are

encountered with 60m being the largest local variation.

The low areas are filled with proglacial lacustrine clay

and silt covered with organically derived muskeg.

The areas of more moderate relief are covered with glacial

till and outwash sand. Before the area had become stabilized

by vegetation prevailing winds had created burchan dunes with

cuspa toward the wind direction. These "dunes are confined to

the eastern portion of the project area.

Glacial till was encountered just above the bedrock

surface. This till sheet most probably covers the entire area,

however, where overburden is in excess of 5 meters, the presence

or absence of glacial till could not be ascertained with

certainty because of the limit of reach of the backhoe was 5

meters.

Several eskers traversed the property in a north-south

direction notably along the east shore of Mouse Lake and down

the main road east of Ottereyes, Zurloff and Kuitosse Lakes.

Drainage is to the north from Mouse Lake to Burrows Creek

and west to Mattagami Lake for the western one half of the area.

Drainage for the eastern one half of the area is from Little

Marne Lake to Marne Lake to Upper Grassy Lake thence north to

Sinclair Lake and to the Mattagami River. The Mattagami River

eventually joins the Moose River which flows into the south end

of James Bay.

- 9 -

NATURAL RESOURCES

The project area is forest covered, Jackpine with some red

and white pine grow on the sandy portions. Poplar, birch,

spruce and lesser amounts of pine and alders cover the till and

outwash areas. Swamp and muskeg covered areas support alders,

spruce, balsam, tamarack and cedar. Blueberries, Labrador tea

and numerous grasses, ferns and wildflowers are common throughout

the project area.

Timber operations have been active in the past and the

area was last burned over some twenty years ago. Much of the

sand covered area has been the subject of a reforestation effort

by the Ministry of Natural Resources and harvesting could begin

in the next ten to fifteen years.

- 10 - 4

WILDLIFEV

*

Moose, bear, wolf, fox and lynx were sighted on occassion

as were beaver, weasel, ground hog, muskrat, racoon and skunk.

Bald eagles, ospreys, red tail hawks, owls, raven; crows,

whiskey jacks, robins, sparrows, swallows, slickers, black birds,

mallard ducks, pin tail ducks, teal, Canadian geese, and spruce

and ruffed grouse were observed. The area is prime grouse,

moose and bear hunting country with many hunters converging

there during the spring and fall hunting seasons. Several s

trappers are active in the area during the trapping season.

The lakes contain northern pike and pickerel and the streams

are often inhabited by trout providing fishermen with plenty

of easily accessible fishing sites.

- 11 -t"'

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The writer is solely responsible for the-form and content

of this report. Th*, author -made all geological traverses and

outcrop examinations and performed all sampling. Some trenching

was done by air hammer drilling and blasting and in this the

author was assisted by Peter Wallgren.

Total rock analysis and Jensen, AFM, ACF and A'FK diagram

calculations were performed by. X-Ray Assay Laboratories Ltd. of

1885 Leslie St., Don Mills, Ontario MSB 3J4 and assays were done

by Bell-White Analytical Laboratories Ltd. of 374 Browning St.,

P.O. Box 187, Haileybury, Ontario POJ 1KO. Thin sections were

made by Arnprior Industrial Lapidary Services of 114 John

St. North, Arnprior, Ontario K.7S 2N6.

Photomicrographs were made by the author using a Vickers

M72C polarizing microscope and a Minolta SR-102 camera.

Overburden sampling was carried out by W.O. Karvinen and

Associates Ltd. of Wahnapitae, Ontario POM 3CO with special

guidance rendered by Dr. Heikki Kirvas of the Geological Survey

of Finland. Dr. W. O. Karvinen provided the initial till

sampling plan and consulting geologist Rauno Aaltonen of London,

Ontario and Bruce Raine and Dan Vaillancourt of Timmins carried

out the sampling program assisted by a timber skidder mounted

backhoe provided by M. Michaud and Sons Ltd. of Monteith, Ontario,

Heavy tnedia separation of till samples was performed by

Overburden Drilling Management Ltd. of 3 Cleopatra Dr., Nepean,

Ontario K2G 3M9.

- 12 -

Ground magnetometer, VLF electromagnetic, horizontal loop

Max Min electromagnetic, induced polarization and resistivity

surveys were carried out by Newmont personnel and Rayan

Exploration Ltd, of 125 Golf Club Rd., North Bay, Ontario P1B 8X7.

Geophysical consulting was rendered by Heikki Limion, Chief

Geophysicist of Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd. and

R.S. Middleton, Manager of the Timmins office, Newmont Exploration

of Canada Ltd. Newmont field personnel were Eigls Stiebrins,

Henry Zurloff, Phil Dunn, Pete Wallgren, Andy Mcparland, Dana

Giltnan and Mike McKay. Rayan Exploration Ltd. personnel were

R.J. Meikle, B.P. Belanger, Don Fudge, T.G. Howards,

R.M. Mathieu, J. Weckworth, D. Crowley, J. Starsyk and

D. Wharram

Diamond drilling was carried out by Norex Drilling Ltd.

P.O. Box 88, Porcupine, Ontario PON ICO. F. Plante and

D. Desjardins were the drillers and D. Bordeleau and Y. Lasalle

were helpers.

Line cutting was performed by Henry T. Gonzalez Exploration

Services Ltd. P.O. Box 695, Tiromins, Ontario P4N 3X8.

Expediting was done by W.J. Blahey's Red and White Store

of Timmins and C.D. Payette General Store and Esso Dealership

of Gogama, Ontario.

Typing was done by Sylvia David of Newmont and prints

were made by A-Line Reproductions.

- 13 -

PREVIOUS WORK

Early government sponsored work was conducted by

T.L. Gledhill (1926) during a reconnaissance of the Grassy

River. At various times parts of the surrounding area "have been

mapped or otherwise investigated by government geologists,

however, Burrows and Kemp Townships have not been the subjects

of any in-depth study. Beginning in 1973 and again in 1976 a

summary of assessment work for Burrows Township was made and

published by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Data

Series Map P.1218, Lovell et al (1977). Burrows and Kemp

Townships were covered in the regional compilation published

as the Timmins-Kirkland Lake Sheet, Map 2205 by Pyke et al

(1973) .

The following paragraphs summarize work performed on

or near the claims for which this report is submitted for

assessment work. Figure 3 is a Data Location Map showing the

locations of the claim blocks over which assessment work has

previously been filed. Table l shows the company name, type

of work and the year that work was performed. This work is

on file at the office of the Resident Geologist, Kirkland

Lake, Ontario and at the Assessment File Records Office, 77

Grenville St., Toronto, Ontario.

- 14 -

DATA LOCATION MAPBURROWS TOWNSHIP

Scale : 1 : 63,360 or 1 inch to l mile

Modified after Lovell et al (1977)

Figure 3.

- 15 -

BURROWS TOWNSHIPDATA FILED WITH THE

RESIDENT GEOLOGIST

ONTARIO MINISTRY

OF NATURAL RESOURCES

DIVISION OF MINES

KIRKLAND LAKE (Through July 1982)

i.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

***

#

Amax Potash Ltd.(Burrows et al.)

Canex Aerial Exploration, Ltd.

Dominion Gulf Co.

Dowa Mining Co. Ltd.

Hollinger Mines Ltd.

McKay, D.

Paymaster Consolidated Mines, Ltd.(Burrows and Kemp Tp.)

Prospectors Airways Co. Ltd.

Slrola-Karvlnen

Slrola-^Karvinen (Newmont I)

Correspondence and/or reportsDip needle surveyStripping & trenching

^GEOLOGIC

72

60

57,574

8181

oz—tac O

DIAMOND

72

51

74

75

62

57

-

-

ae.IU

UJ

P

Z 0

S

AIRBORNE

IUt—UJ

oUJ•z.0<•s.oOC

uUJ

IU

AIRBORNE

57

ae.

IU

52IUz o c

GROUND A

71

71

-

74

SI, 62

57

62

81

ac.UJK- IU

2IUz o5Oae.t

UJ

IU

O-

o0VERTICAL L

72

74

acIUIr- IU

OIU

o<oac

UJ

OqHORIZONS

ac

IU

So

o<oOf

-JUJ

ac SIU

-62

Zq

ac

0 .d-

INDUCED

u.

81 .

RESISTIVITY

-

-

GRAVITY

^5

GEOCHEMI

72

81

OTHERS

52*

60**

57**

81 #

NOTE: The numbers on the above list stand for the year when the work was done, e.g., 66 for 1966. On the accompanying DATA LOCATION MAP, only areas for which work was submitted to the Division are outlined, and thus a company may hold more ground than Indicated here. The numbers on the DATA LOCATION MAP and any circled numbers refer to the company list above.

lModified after Lovell et al (1977)

Table 1.

- 16 -

AMAX POTASH, INC.

In 1971 Amax Potash staked 4 claims west of little Marne

Lake over ground covered by the northwest portion of the East

Group.

Ground magnetometer and vertical loop electromagnetic

surveys were conducted in 1971 and 1972. In 1972 geologic

mapping and soil geochemistry programs were conducted. Mafic

and felsic to intermediate metavolcanics were encountered cut

by diabase and syenite dikes. Good correlation between copper,

lead and zinc was achieved with the soil geochemistry survey.

The topsoil indicated better correlation than the subsoil,

possibly because higher values were obtained in the topsoil

portion than in the subsoil portion.

Several small gossan zones that outcrop in the area may be

the cause of the above background values.

One diamond drill hole was drilled to a depth of 375 feet

to test the VEM conductor thought to be associated with the

geochem anomaly across the northern portion of the claim group.

This hole intersected a dacite fragmental to tuffaceous unit

with a graphitic zone grading into graphitic argillite then

to argillite. This would indicate tops are oriented to the

north. The rocks are cut by felsic and lamprophyre dikes.

Drill core assays indicated: Cu ranged from 62 to 256 ppm,

Zn ranged from 109 to 1,260 ppm and Ag ranged from 0.7 to 2.6

ppm. All assay values were in the graphitic argillite.

- 17 -

CANEX AERIAL EXPLORATION LIMITED

In J.9-71 B.D. Sirola staked roughly the same ground as the

McKay property. Canex Aerial Exploration Ltd. optioned the

property and conducted a ground magnetometer survey over it.

The objective of this survey was to delineate any ultramafic

metavolcanics or intrusives that may have been associated with

the iron formation and examine those rocks for gold. No ultra

mafic rocks were found or at least not recognized in outcrop

and their interpretation of -magnetic data lead Canex to feel

that any possible ultramafic Bodies were too narrow to be of

economic interest.

- 18 -

DOMINION GULF COMPANY

In 1951 Dominion Gulf Company optioned 9 claims from

O.E. Winters and attempted by diamond drilling to find the source

of the rusty iron formation float found near the northern

boundary of claim L.517209 and the southern boundary of claim

L.547212 of the West Group. One grab sample they took is

reported to have assayed 2.85 02. Au/ton. Four holes were

drilled by Heath K Sherwood numbered l through 4 to depths of

645, 506, 205 and 172 feet respectively. Hole locations are

plotted on the accompanying geology map."

Rock types encountered were:

Amphibolitized mafic metavolcanics with or without garnets.

Siliceous gneiss or felsic metavolcanic-welded tuff.

Talc-chlorite-carbonate schist, possibly a carbonitized

ultramafic zone.

Banded iron formation mainly oxide facies but sulfides

were noted as was chlorite.

Syenite, feldspar porphyry, lamprophyre, and diabase dikes.

No assays were reported in the logs filed for assessment

credit.

- 19 -

DOWA MINING COMPANY LIMITED

- In 1974 D.F. Des Rosiers staked 16 claims south of Mouse

Lake S west of Hook Lake under Dowa Mining Company Ltd. Watts

Griffis and McOuat Ltd. conducted ground magnetometer and

vertical loop electromagnetic surveys over 6 of the claims.

Several east trending conductors were delineated and two holes

were drilled by Morissette Diamond Drilling Ltd. to a depth

of 92 and 207 feet respectively. The exploration target was

massive sulfides. Drilling intersected dacitic tuffaceous \

rock, schistose with disseminated pyrite from roughly 20 feet

to 40 feet followed by a unit of banded gneissic rhyolite with

disseminated pyrrhotite and pyrite, minor andesite and some

chloritic and carbonate alteration. The author interprets

this unit to be an exhalative unit about 15 feet thick over

lying an iron formation approximately 15 feet thick. This iron

formation may best be described as magnetitic chert interlayered

with magnetite ironstone with l to 10% pyrite, pyrrhotite and

chalcopyrite. Beneath this unit is a dark green amphibolite,

most probably a mafic metavolcanic unit. Hole one terminated

in this unit while hole 1A passes through this unit and termi

nates in a medium grained gabbro.

- 20 -

HOLLINGER MINES LIMITED

In 1975 Hollinger Mines Ltd. compiled previous data on the

area just east of Mouse Lake, now the West Group and drilled

four diamond drill holes on what are now claims L.547209,

L.547211, L.547212 and L.547217. Three of the diamond drill

holes, BU1-2-75, BUl-3-75 and BUl-4-75, were drilled to test

the extent of the several iron formation outcroppings some l 000

feet east of Mouse Lake ana gQO to 700 feet north of the stream

that empties Hook Lake into Mouse Lake. One diamond drill hole

BU1-1-75 was drilled to test the conductor north of the iron

formation outcroppings. This conductor does not outcrop. The

conductor proved to be a silica-rich, graphitic iron formation.

Assay values for gold were nil. Two graphitic tuff zones with

pyrite roughly 10 feet thick were not assayed. One of two

carbon!tized anderite zones was assayed with results nil in gold.

Other iron formation intersections in the latter three

drill holes did not carry anomalous gold values.

- 21 -

iV

D. MCKAY - PICKANDS MATHER OPTION

In 1960 Pickands Mather and Company optioned the McKay

property south of the Nest Group to assess the iron formation

there for economic potential.

A magnetometer survey was conducted and profiles made.

A geological survey delineated an iron formation 600 feet wide

and 2,000 feet long. Calculations indicated 109,000 tons/

vertical foot or some 12 to 17 million tons of crude ore.

Three diamond drill holes were drilled, DH-1, 2 and 3 tos

depths of 231, 262 and 509 feet. No assays were indicated in

the logs submitted for assessment work, but the company assumed

a 30* Fe content for their grade calculations and felt the

deposit was too small to be of economic import.

t

- 22 -

PAYMASTER CONSOLIDATED MINES LIMITED

In 1957 Paymaster Consolidated Mines Ltd. staked 53 claims

in Burrows and Kemp Townships centered around Little Marne Lake

over ground now covered by the East Group of claims. Paymaster

had Aerophysics of Canada Ltd. perform an airborne electromagne

tic survey over the property and 3 conductors were delineated

over the central and southern portions of Little Marne Lake.

Ground follow up work was initiated with a brief dip needle

survey followed by a ground magnetometer survey of the whole

property by Sharpe Geophysical Surveys Ctd. Magnetic anomalies

were checked by EM methods. The best correlation between

magnetic and EM data was noted along the north shore of Little

Marne Lake.

The area was geologically mapped and a series of ultramafic,

mafic and intermediate flows along with some associated intrusive

rocks were found. Mafic spherulitic and pillow lavas were noted

as was intermediate agglomerate or flow breccia.

The chicken track lava described in the report and attribu

ted to alteration is actually spinifex texture of the middle to

upper portion of an ultramafic metavolcanic flow. This was

confirmed by the author upon examination of the Paymaster drill

core found at the drill site on Little Marne Lake. Gray (ankerite)

and green (fuchsite) carbonitized ultramafic units outcrop and

were intersected in diamond drill holes.

- 23 -

Tfrree diamond drill were drilled numbered B-l through B-3x

to depths of 698,995 and 545 feet respectively. Most assay values

were trace only with some 0.01 and 0.02 and a lone 0.11 oz Au/ton

value being recorded. Tops are indicated to be south by spinifex

and altered zone positions* however, this is not definite. The

hole locations are plotted on the geology map accompanying this

report.

- 24 -

PROSPECTORS AIRWAYS COMPANY LIMITED

In 1962 Prospectors Airways Co. Ltd. staked two blocks of

claims centered around Camp Lake and conducted a ground magneto

meter and JEM electromagnetic survey over the property. The JEM

survey delineated three short discontinuous conductors along the

southwest shore of Camp Lake.

These conductors did not appear to be of sufficient interest

to warrant follow-up by diamond drilling and the claims were

allowed to lapse.

Newmont's own ground electromagnetic surveys in this general

vicinity also delineated several similar conductors. These could

be caused by lake bottom edge effect or by small interflow

conductive units. Possibly a horizontal loop multifrequency

survey over them could provide a better qualitative classification.

- 25 -

SIROLA-KARVINEN

The Sirola-Karvinen claim group, which is now the West Group

described in this report, was the subject of a preliminary asses

sment -.by W.O. Karvinen in 1980. This work consisted of geological

mapping of claims L.547209 through L.547212 inclusive, detailed

overburden investigations, trenching and overburden blasting

to locate the source of the rusty float along the north boundary

of claim L.547210. This mechanical work was spread over several

claims. This search was unsuccessful due to limited manpower

s

and funds so the property was optioned to Newmont for a more

detailed assessment.

- 26 -

SIROLA-KARVINEN (NEWMONT OPTION)

The Sirola-Karvinen claim groups L,547207 through L.547222

inclusive (West Group) and L.550160, L.550162 through L.550168

inclusive and Newmont's claim L.628518 (East Group) were taken

under option by Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd. in late 1981.

With Newmont's joint venture partner, Dupont of Canada

Exploration Ltd. as a financial participant, Newmont undertook

a preliminary examination of these claims with some overlap

onto surrounding claims subsequently staked by Newmont to cover

the aeromagnetic anomalies in Burrows and Kemp Townships. This

work consisted of line cutting, a geological survey, a ground

magnetometer and VLF EM survey and an overburden till sampling

heavy media separation geochemical survey. All this work was

submitted for assessment credit.

In addition to this work, an induced polarization survey,

a resistivity survey and a horizontal loop MAX MlN survey were

instituted. These surveys were continued on other Newmont claims

during the winter months and during the summer of 1982. These

later results are the subject of the present report.

The results of the first pass survey delineated magnetic

and EM anomalies worth further detailed work by more sophisticated

geophysical methods. Several anomalies extended to adjoining

claims and these were recommended for follow-up geophysics.

Diamond drill targets were also delineated and three (3)

holes were drilled on the West Group and two (2) holes were

- 27 -

drilled on the East Group. The purpose of the drilling on the

West Group was to assist in unravelling the complex stratigraphy

in that area as well as to test the several geophysical anomalies.

For the East Group, the geology was thought to be somewhat more

straight forward and the anomalies were less complicated so the

drilling in that area was more to test the anomalies than for

geological information. The previously unknown contact between

mafic and ultramafic metavolcanic flows was located by the diamond

drilling program. The results of this diamond drill program

will be submitted for assessment credit^

- 28 -

GENERAL GEOLOGY

The bedrock in the area is of Early Precambrian (Archean)

age. Unconsolidated deposits of Pleistocene and Recent age

mantle most of the area. Outcrop coverage is less than it of

the area, therefore, geophysical, geochemical and diamond drill

hole data was most important in the geological interpretation

seen in Figure 4.

Ultramafic metavolcanic rocks of peridotitic to basaltic

komatiitic composition and pillowed to massive mafic metavolcanics

of magnesium-rieh to iron-rich tholeiitic composition are the

oldest rocks in the area. The ultramafic metavolcanics are best

developed on the East Group of claims and are present as a

series of flows ranging in thickness from just over l meter to

about 10 meters. The komatiitic package probably does not

exceed 500 meters in total thickness. The mafic units are

thicker. Individual flows could not be delineated with precision,

however, massive to pillowed units were noted as were pyroclastic

units. Some of the thicker flows were medium grained (1-3 mm

crystals) but exhibited flow texture in outcrop. Sills and dikes

of gabbro and lamprophyre were often found associated with these

flows and in some cases could have been feeders from a central

magma chamber. These units are on the order of 500 to over 1000

meters thick and comprise roughly 60 to 70% of the total rock

noted. Carbonitization of some of these rocks has no doubt

caused previous workers to classify them into a more felsic

category due to the lighter color resulting from such alteration.

- 29 -

Figur* 4- Generallied geology of th* SIrolo-Karvinen option and the Newmont-Du Pont claims, Burrows and Kemp Township*,

Ontario. Scale; Is 63,360.

Coba It Group m*tat*dlm*n11

Major dlabat* dlkvi

Oraned lerM* batholith

Iron formation

LIOINDFvlilc to Intermediate mota volcanics

Mafic to Intermediate metavolcanlct

Komatlltlc meta volcanic f

Major breaks

IIIIIIIIII Minor breaks

Anticline

Syncline

- 30 -

Total rock analysis and Jensen and AFM plots provide a sound

basis for proper classification. Calc-alkaline basalts were noted

in several small outcrops and are thought to form a unit between

mafic metavolcanic flows and intermediate pyroclastics.

Intermediate tuffs, lapilli tuffs and volcanic breccias

form a transition phase between the mafic and felsic metavolcanic

units and are tholeiitic to calc-alkaline in composition.

Felsic metavolcanic flows, tuffs, lapilli tuffs and volcanic

breccia were noted and were especially common in the South Group

area. Porphyritic dikes possibly represent feeders from a central

magma chamber. They are calc-alkaline in composition.

Clastic metasedimentary rocks are not common and were noted

in outcrop only south of Ottereyes Lake. This was an argillaceous

unit. Diamond drill data by Amax (1972) and Newmont (1982)

reported carbonaceous argillite, argillite and arenite to pebble

conglomerate from drill holes south of Little Marne Lake. These

metasediments appear to be related to felsic to intermediate

volcanism notably the exhalative phases of such volcanism.

Chemical metasedimentary rocks are generally exhalative in

origin and are represented by oxide-rich banded magnetitic chert

interbedded with magnetite ironstones and pyrite-pyrrhotite rich

phases of these oxide facies units and at least two chert-

sulfide units, one found in outcrop and one noted by diamond

drilling Dowa (1974). These sulfide units were easily traced

by electromagnetic devices.

A large granodiorite batholith borders the western portion

- 31 -

of the area and makes itself known by extensive albitization,

epidotization and amphibolitization of the metavolcanic rocks in

that area. A similar intrusive plug was noted southwest of

Karvinen Lake intruding the mafic and felsic metavolcanic

series. Some smaller syenitic outcrops were also noted and could

be part of a larger syenite plug.

Diabase dikes traverse the area and are diabase, quartz

diabase and porphyritic (Matachewan) diabase types. All have

been classified as Early Precambrian in age, however, some may

be younger.

Most of the rocks of the area are part of a steeply dipping

synclinal structure, the axis of which trends northeast across

the western part of the area then swings southeast across the

north and east parts of the area.

Regional metamorphism of the rocks is greenschist to lower

amphibolite facies with some rocks near the Togo Batholith

subjected to contact metamorphism of lower to middle amphibolite

facies.

- 32 -

TABLE 2TABLE OF LITHOLOGIC UNITS FOR THE SIROLA-KARVINEN PROPERTY AND THE NEWONT-DU PONT JOINT VENTURE IN BURROWS TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO -

PHANEROZOIC CENOZOIC

QUATERNARYPLEISTOCENE AND RECENT

Clay, sand, gravel, till and swamp and stream deposits

UNCONFORMITY

PRECAMBRIANEARLY PRECAMBRIAN

MAFIC INTRUSIVE ROCKSDiabase, quartz diabase, porphyritic (Matachewan)

diabase

INTRUSIVE CONTACT

FELSIC INTRUSIVE ROCKSAmphibolite, forming marginal phases of granodiorite i

aplite, syenite, syenitic feldspar porphyry, granitic quartz feldspar porphyry , granodiorite

INTRUSIVE CONTACT

METAMORPHOSED MAFIC INTRUSIVE ROCKSGabbro, diorite, magnesium tholeiite porphyry

INTRUSIVE CONTACT

METAVOLCANIC AND METASEDIMENTARY ROCKS CHEMICAL METASEDIMENTARY ROCKSMagnetitic chert interlayered with magnetite ironstone,

pyritic chert interlayered with pyrite ironstone, chlorite and carbonate layers within ironstone units

CLASTIC METASEDIMENTARY ROCKSArgillite, carbonaceous argillite, arenite to pebble

conglomerate with pyrite balls

FELSIC METAVOLCANIC ROCKS (CALC-ALKALINE)Massive unstratified tuff, crystal tuff, lapilli tuff,

volcanic breccia

INTERMEDIATE METAVOLCANIC ROCKS (THOLEIITIC AND CALK-ALKALINE) Massive unstratified tuff, lapilli tuff, volcanic

breccia, garnet bearing tuffs and lapilli tuffs

MAFIC METAVOLCANIC ROCKS (THOLEIITIC AND MINOR CALC-ALKALINE) Massive to well foliated flows, pillowed flows,

amphibolitized and gneissic lavas, tuff, lapilli tuff, volcanic breccia, garnet bearing flows

KOMATIITIC METAVOLCANIC ROCKSMassive polysutured serpentinized peridotitic komatiite,

spinifex textured flows, massive and pillowed basaltic komatiite, lapilli tuff to tuff breccia, extensive carbonate, chlorite and talc alteration.

- 33 -

EARLY PRECAMBRIAN (ARCHEAN) METAVOLCANIC ROCKS

The metavolcanic sequence in Burrows Township may be

subdivided into three rock series on the basis of geochemistry:

(1) komatiite, (2) tholeiite and (3) calc-alkaline. The

methods for doing this are based on calculations for ternary

diagrams obtained from total rock geochemical analysis. Two

ternary plots were used for chemical classification: (1) the

Jensen Cation plot (Jensen, 1976) using A1-0-, Fe.O -f Ti00 , MgOifc .5 t* .3 4*

and (2) the AFM diagram, .(Irving and Barager, 1971) using

Na2O + K O, Fed (total), MgO. Of these, the Jensen Cation

plot was most useful in discriminating rocks in the komatiitic

series from those in the iron and magnesium tholeiitic suite

and further differentiates those of the calc-alkaline suite.

Further discussions involving methodology and the plots

themselves, Figures 11 and 12, including calculations, may be

found in the section on geochemistry.

- 34 -

KOMATIITIC METAVOLCANIC ROCKS

The term 'komatiite 1 has been introduced from South

African Literature to describe rocks in and around the

Barberton Mountain area, particularly within the Swaziland

sequence.

In general, rocks of a komatiitic affinity have Ca/Al

rations <l, a low TiO- content (<0.9%) and a lower Fe/Mg

ratio compared to Al ?0. than for rocks of tholeiitic or

calc-alkaline affinities.

- 35 -

PERIDOTITIC KOMATIITES

No rocks analyzed fell into the peridotitic komatiite

category on the Jensen Cation plot, however, four .did on the

AFM diagram. This does not mean that the rock-type is missing

from the area, only that it was not analyzed for. If they do

exist, it is not likely in excess of 5% of the total rock units.

Spinifex texture was noted in sample 9136. The outcrop was

sheared and on the fresh surface, the rock was dusky blue to

dusky blue green, which is indicative of the komatiite rocks

in general. The rock weathers greenish gray to moderate brown.

Rock colors used in this report are standardized by the use of

the Rook Color Chart published by the Geological Society of

America, Goddard et al (1948). Samples 9756, 9760 and 9763 were

from diamond drill holes B-82-2, B-82-6 and B-82-1, respectively.

In each case, the rock was badly broken along foliation planes

and was a talc-chlorite-carbonate rock greenish gray to dark

greenish gray in color.

Sample 9136 was obviously a flow, however, and it is likely

the units encountered in diamond drilling were also flows as

very few komatiitic tuffaceous units have ever been reported.

The flows encountered in diamond drilling range from 0.7 to 4

meters.thick.

In thin section, alteration of pyroxenes to serpentine,

tremolite and chlorite has taken place. Iron-titanium oxides

occurred as fine dustings along interblade areas. No relic

- 36 -

olivine was noted. Carbonate content ranged from 10 to 40*,

however, most of the time it was in the 5 to 15% range. CO,

vaules ranged from 0.2 to T.5%.

- 37 -

BASALTIC KOMATIITES

Basaltic komatiites were better established chemically than

the peridotitic variety. They were noted as flows/ some pillowed

and some in the classical flow sequence, peridotite-spinifex-

polysutured, described by Pyke et al (1973), Figure 5. Individ

ual flows, 2 to 4 meters thick, were easily noted in outcrop

on line 36 east between 50 and 75 north and to a lesser degree

on line 44 east at 75 south.

Some gabbroic sills were noted within the sequence and whens

analyzed either fell into the basaltic komatiite or magnesium

tholeiite categories. These units are thought to be the

peridotitic part of the flow, however, they are shown as gabbro,

subscripted basaltic komatiite on the geological map in order

to indicate structural trends.

The rocks were grayish blue green weathering light to

moderate brown.

The rocks were altered largely to tremolite in felted

masses and carbonate and chlorite commonly associated with the

alteration. Skeleton pyroxene and olivine are present as

serpentine or antigorite. Iron-titanium oxides occur as fine

dustings along spinifex blades and randomly as idiomorphic

crystals in the coarser grained units. Plagioclase (lS-20%)

was noted in one sample.

Basaltic komatiites make up about 5 to 10* of the rock

types on the claim group.

- 38 -

JOVERLYING FLOW UNIT

UPPER PART OF FU)W UNIT .

A] Chilled and fractured flow top.

A, Spinifex.

LOWER PART OF FLOW UNIT

B, Foliated skeletal olivine.

B] B4 Mediunvto fine-grained peridotite.

B, Knobby peridotite.

UNDERLYING FLOW UNIT

Figure 5-Oiagrammatic section of a typical ultramafic flow in Munro Township (after fVk*. drett and Eckstrand 1973).

- 39 -

CARBONITIZATION

The komatiitic rocks were largely altered to carbonate

minerals. No attempt, other than visual, was made to differen

tiate carbonate types. This carbonitization does not destroy

the primary textures. An outcrop of green carbonate (fuchsite

rich) was noted on the point, on line 59 east, at about 800

south. From this location, Paymaster (1957) drilled two diamond

drill holes and intersected what they called gray (ankerite)

carbonate and green (fuchsite) carbonate with massive (perido-s

titic and ploysutured) and chicken track (spinifex) textures.

Some of this drill core was found on location and the primary

structures were indeed preserved.

CO~ values range from <0.1% to 7.5%, demonstrating consi

derable variation in carbonate alteration. Observed carbonate

in thin section ranges from <l% to 40%.

- 40 -

MAFIC METAVOLCANIC ROCKS (THOLEIITIC AND CALC-ALKALINE) MAGNESIUM THOLEIITES

Tholeiitic metavolcanic rocks are subdivided into two

groups: (1) magnesium-rich tholeiites and (2) iron-rich

tholeiites.

Magnesium tholeiite rocks were quite wide-spread, making

up 2(^ of the rock types mapped. They occur as massive or

pillowed flows ranging in from under 100 to 150 meters thick.

These rocks are often nearby or in contact with komatiitic

rocks which aids in differentiating them in the field from

calc-alkaline basalts and andesites. The exception in this

area is in the South Group where no komatiitic rocks were

noted, yet a magnesium tholeiite basalt flow was mapped.

Rock color of magnesium tholeiites is generally similar to

calc-alkaline basalts and andesites which are usually a light

greenish gray. Again in the South Group, the magnesium

tholeiites were dusky blue green to dark greenish gray to

greenish black, colors generally associated with iron

tholeiites.

Most of these rocks are aphanitic, except for thicker

flow portions which are medium grained. Mafic minerals,

tremolite-actinolite (SO-60%), hornblende (S-10%) and chlorite

make a color index over 35 and feldspars (30 to 40%) with

quartz and accessory apatite, sphene, sulfides and iron-

titanium oxides making up the balance. -Hardness is 4 to 5.

- 41 -

IRON THOLEIITES

Iron tholeiite basalts are the most wide-spread metavol-

canic rock in the area, comprising at least 501. of the rock

units.

The rocks are aphanitic in massive to pillowed flows up

to 150 meters thick and are medium grained in the coarser flow

portions. They are dark greenish gray to greenish black and

weather greenish gray to moderate brown. Hardness is generally

4 to 5.s

Amphibole/ usually green and brown hornblende is the

dominant mafic mineral ranging from 10 to over 30t. Tremolite

may range from 15 to 20%. Most plagioclase has been

saussaritized so determination of An content is not reliable.

Quartz may be present up to 1(H (usually <5%) and may be

secondary along with secondary albite and epidote. Iron-

titanium oxides, partially altered to leucoxene range from

3 to 5t. Some garnitiferous zones were noted in diamond

drill core, Hollinger (1975), Dominion Gulf (1951) and

Newmont (1982) . This drilling was done near the Togo

Batholith and the garnets and associated coarse amphibole

could be the result of contact metamorphism of almandine-

amphibolite facies grade.

- 42 -

CALC-ALKALINE BASALTS

Calc-alkaline basalts were noted in several locations as

aphanitic massive, tuffaceous, porphyritic and pillowed units.

Pillows are not well developed and not reliable.as top

determinations. These units are difficult to separate from

andesitic and dacitic end members in the field as the color

and hardness of all are so similar. Color is grayish green,

greenish gray to medium light bluish gray.

The calc-alkaline basalts and andesites are usually

prophyritic with hypidiomorphic twinned plagioclase 0.2 to

0.3 mm of An up to 35 to 40% by volume. The pheno-

crysts are set in a fine-grained matrix of xenomorphic

plagioclase, chlorite, actinolite, quartz, iron-titanium

oxides, sulfides and accessory zircon and apitite. Alteration

products, sericite, epidote and calcite are present as well.

- 43 -

INTERMEDIATE METAVOLCANIC ROCKS (THOLEIITIC AND CALC-ALKALINE)

For the most part, the intermediate metavolcanic rocks

are lapilli tuffs with tuffs and volcanic breccia less common.

Some may have carbonate vesicles and fillings. The rocks may

have a tholeiitic or calc-alkaline affinity and several ride

the line on the Jensen Cation plot. These rocks make up

roughly 5% of the rock types and may be up to 250 meters thick

and may be transitional into overlying felsic metavolcanic

units.

The rocks are medium to dark gray to grayish green, with

hardness 5 to 6 and color index 5 to 6, <35> 15. The green

color may be due to chloritic replacement of crushed pumice.

The rock is often porphyritic with plagioclase laths 0.3 to

l mm up to 10%. Quartz phenocrysts may be 10 to 15%. These

phenocrysts are set in a fine matrix of plagioclase, 30 to 40%,

quartz, 10 to 15*, hornblende 10 to 15% and biotite 5 to 10*fc.

Tremolite and sericite along with iron-titanium oxides,

sulfides, chlorite and carbonate comprise the balance of the

rock mineralogy. An outcrop of garnitiferous intermediate

lapilli tuff (tholeiitic dacite) was noted on line 4 west at

1550 south.

- 44 -

FELSIC METAVOLCANIC ROCKS (CALC-ALKALINE)

Felsic metavolcanic rocks occur as crystal tuff and

lapilli tuff units of rhyolitic composition. They comprise

approximately 15% of the rock types in the area. The rocks

are porphyritic with phenocrysts of quartz and/or potassium

feldspar to l mm comprising up to 20* of the rock. These

phenocrysts are set up in an aphanitic matrix of quartz,

potassium and sodic feldspar. Pumice has been altered or

replaced by chlorite, biotite and sericite. Color of these

rocks is medium to dark gray to yellowish grey to gray olive.

The degree of yellowishness is a factor of percent sericite

composition. Sulfides are common and increase with hydro

thermal alteration as does carbonate. Feldspars exhibit

sericitic and kaolinitic alteration. Hardness is greater

than 6.

These rocks appear to be associated with late stage

volcanism and may be associated with exhalative units.

Layering was not observed, however. Where lapilli and breccia

units were observed, the fragments were monolithic and frag

ment size differed greatly with distribution in any one

outcrop. This is suggestive of an explosive eruption rather

than a quite extrusion of lava.

- 45 -

METASEDIMENTARY ROCKS CLASTIC METASEDIMENTARY ROCKS

Only one outcrop of clastic metasedimentary rock was found

on the claim group. South of Ottereyes Lake, an outcrop of

argillite is cut by a diabase dike. This unit was contorted,

possibly from the intrusion of the dike, and the general trend

could only be estimated. The rock was grayish green and

weathered grayish orange pink to moderate brown. No other

rock was found in contact with this unit and no other exposures

were noted so the area allotted to this unit was left small.

Another similar but more arenaceous metasedimentary outcrop

was noted at the north end of Marne Lake off the claim group.

Other workers, Pyke et al (1973) have classified this unit as

a member of the Cobalt Group of Late Precambrian age.

Diamond drilling by Amax Potash, Inc. (1972), west of

Little Marne Lake, encountered graphitic argillite and

argillite. Diamond drilling by Newmont (1982), south of Little

Marne Lake, encountered a similar unit and also a peeble

conglomerate. These units were closely related to an interme

diate tuffaceous unit and a graphitic horizon. The exact

boundary between these clastic units and the associated

graphitic-pyritic exhalative unit is not clear cut.

- 46 -

CHEMICAL METASEDIMENTARY ROCKS

The Ontario Geological Survey is now using the term

ironstone in place of the older conventional iron

for the banded oxide, sulfide and carbonate exhalative units

and replacement sulfide inhalative units in an attempt to

conform with the American Commission on Stratigraphic

Nomenclature, Articles 6 and 10, American Association of

Petroleum Geologists (1961). The survey would like to reserve

the term iron formation for a mappable geologic, stratigraphic

or lithologic units that can be associated with geographical

names. The term ironstone is reserved for rocks containing

more than 33% common iron minerals by volume. This would

exclude many exhalative chert or silica-rich metasedimentary

rocks and carbonate rocks which should be called what they

are rather than lumped into the general term iron formation

or even worse lean iron formation. The author prefers the

use of iron-rich rocks or iron-rich chemical metasedimentary

rocks. The term facies has also been discarded in preference

to notations indicating the dominance of oxide (magnetite

specularite, hematite, etc.), sulfide (pyrite, pyrrhotite,

etc.) and carbonate (siderite) minerals.

The most common exposures of iron-rich metasedimentary

rocks is on the South Group of claims. Mast have an oxide

mineral affinity although at least two sulfide affinity

iron-rich units were observed either in outcrop or from

- 47 -

diamond drill results. Magnetite with minor specularite is

the dominate iron mineral associated with oxide affinity iron-

rich rocks while pyrite and lesser amounts of pyrrhotite and

minor chalcopyrite and sphalerite are the minerals associated

with the sulfide affinity iron-rich rocks. Siderite was

reported in drilling by Pickands Mather (1962) as veins and

bands. The author recovered.core at drill sites in the bush

and substantiated this report. Some beds of chlorite were

noted as interbeds in the iron-rich rock units. Individual

bands are l to 3 cm thick with beds measured in outcrop from

30 cm to 10 m thick. From diamond drilling, these units have

been reported as thick as 48 meters, Pickands Mather (1962),

although the author believes that a series of iron-rich units

separated by mafic metavolcanic rock were combined to give

such an intersection.

The chert has been recrystallized giving the silica-rich

bands the appearance of quartzite. The massive sulfide iron-

rich units appear as EM conductors and when sufficient

pyrrhotite is present are magnetically anomalous as well.

The oxide affinity iron-rich rocks are magnetically anomalous

in any case and where magnetite content is high enough or

sulfide content sufficient, they also appear as EM conductors.

In diamond drilling by Newmont (1982) several inhalative

pyrite and pyrite-pyrrhotite zones on the order of 10 to 30 cm

were encountered. These quite possibly are formed by iron

- 48 -

and sulfur-rich solutions and gases percolating through flow

top or bottom breccia or factured zones and precipitating out in

cavities and even replacing the host rock. This process could

have caused the disseminated sulfide zones on either side of

the massive zone where the less broken rock was not so

susceptible to the flow of these fluids. Economic mineraliza

tion was expected in these units, however, sampling and

drilling to date have been disappointing. The overburden

till sampling and heavy media separation program, Newmont

(1982), did define several anomalous gold areas down ice from

the iron-rich rock units including one assay of 756 ppb in a

magnetic fraction.

These iron-rich units are often contorted and may be

even brecciated in places. This phenomena may be caused by

loading of overlying units and/or subsequent tectonic defor

mation .

A graphitic zone with disseminated pyrite was delineated

by EM and induced polarization methods south of Little Marne

Lake. A fault offset of this unit was drilled by Amax (1972).

The major zone was drilled by Newmont (1982) . The Amax

drilling stated the graphitic argillite was hosted in a

dacite fragmental. Total rock analyses by Newmont of drill

core from hole B-82-4 south of Little Marne Lake indicate a

magnesium tholeiite. This unit is brecciated and fractures are

filled with pyrite.

- 49 -

METAMORPHOSED MAFIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS

Metamorphosed mafic intrusive rocks comprise 3 to 5% of

the rocks noted during this survey. They are coarse grained,

3 to 5 mm, greenish black weathering dusky yellowish brown to

brownish black. Plagioclase content is 30 to 4(^ and k-feldspar

may be present up to 5 to 7%. The remaining 50 to 60% is an

amphibole, likely hornblende. Color index is 40 to 60.

In places, this rock is most probably a sill along the

interface between mafic to ultramafic flow units. The rock-\

also could be thicker flow units where cooling of the lava

took place more slowly, thereby allowing for the coarser

grains. Geochemically most of these rocks fell in the magne

sium tholeiite area on the Jensen Cation Plot. Flow texture

in some outcrops is indicative of a flow, however, this could

also be an effect of metamorphism.

Along the boundary of the Togo Batholith, a diorite was

noted. This is likely a hybrid rock type resulting from

digestion of mafic metavolcanics intruded by the granodiorite

batholith.

Within the komatiitic metavolcanic sequence, several sills

or thick flow units were noted. Total rock geochemistry on

selected samples indicated that they are magnesium tholeiite

in composition rather than peridotitic komatiitic as originally

thought.

A samll porphyritic dike magnesium tholeiitic in composition

- 50 -

was noted on Line l west about 1700 south. This dike was

probably a feeder within the mafic metavolcanic sequence.

- 51 -

FELSIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS

The Togo Batholith bounds the claims along the western

boundary of the group. This batholith is granodiorite in

composition with plagioclase 40-50*, K-feldspar 20-25%, quartz

20,25%, with biotite, white mica, Fe-Ti oxides and sulfides

comprising the remainder. The rock is medium to coarse

grained, inequigranular and hypidiomorphic to xenomorphic in

form. Where the batholith is in contact with or close to the

metavolcanic sequence considerable digestion of the metavol-

canic unit has taken place. This has produced an amphibolite

with considerable epidote and albite alteration as a result

of contact metamorphism and hydrothermal activity.

/Several granite quartz feldspar porphyry and syenite

feldspar porphyry dikes were noted throughout the map area.

Some were close to felsic metavolcanic units and could have

been feeder-dikes from a central magma chamber. Aplite dikes

were noted at several locations and several were reported in

diamond drill logs' Paymaster (1957), Amax (1972), Dominion

Gulf (1951) and Hollinger (1975).

An outcrop of pyroxene-rich syenite outcrops west of

Ottereyes Lake. The boundary of this unit has been determined

from the detailed magnetometer survey Newmont conducted over

the property which will be submitted for assessment credit at

a later date.

Felsic intrusive rocks comprise about W of the rocks

found on the claim group.

- 52 -

LATE, MIDDLE AND EARLY PRECAMBRIAN MAFIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS DIABASE, QUARTZ DIABASE AND PORPHYRITIC DIABASE DIKES

Diabase dikes cut all rocks in the area. For the most part

they trend north-south and somewhat west of north-south, however,

a few do trend northwesterly. Due to the lack of exposure in

critical areas, i.e. where the dikes of one type could cut dikes

of another type, and due to their lack of economic interest no

attempt was made to classify them by age group, hence, they were

all labled Early Precambrian for mapping purposes. The fact that

different types were noted does indicate, some age difference

between them, however, A thin section of one dike on Little

Marne Lake, Bowen (1982), indicates micrographic intergrowths

of quartz in a matrix of twinned pyroxene, plagioclase, pyrite

and magnetite. No olivine was noted in that sample or in other

hand specimens. Work by Middleton (1969) and expanded on by

Pyke (1978) attempted to classify the various diabase dikes by

their -trend. Middleton (1969) used remnant magnetism in studies

northwest of Timmins to show that the north-trending dikes have

similar magnetic susceptibilities to Abitibi dikes of Late

Precambrian age. One age date of 2.485 b.y. was reported by

Fahing and Wanless (1963) from a Matachewan (porphyritic) dike

swarm which would put this group in Early Precambrian age. For

an academic study, this area would provide a good set of

specimens for study and assisted by the ground magnetometer survey

conducted by Newmont, proper age classification could be possibly

be made..

- 53 -

The dike rock is grayish green to dusky blue green and

weathers moderate brown. Tension or cooling fractures often

develope perpendicular to dike trend. In some dikes, notably

the larger ones, epidote and albite alteration was noted.

Diabase dikes account for about H of the bedrock in the

map area.

- 54 -

PHANEROZOIC CENOZOIC QUATERNARY PLEISTOCENE AND RECENT

Rock outcrop is less than J.%. Clay, sand gravel, till and

swamp deposits unconformably overlie the Precambrian bedrock.

These deposits are mostly glacial-fluvial and glacial-lacustrine

in nature and cover over 8(^ of the property. The other 2(H

or so is water covered. From diamond drill data, overburden can

be over 20 meters thick. The author estimates bedrock topography

may vary as much as 100 meters with overburden thickness over

80 meters.

Transverse moraines were noted near the South Group of claims

south of Karvinen Lake. The east-central portion of the claim

group is covered by glacial outwash deposits which consist

mostly of sand. This sand was modified by wind action after

the glacial retreat, and before becoming stabilized by vegeta

tion, into barchan dunes up to 20 meters high with cusps

toward the then prevailing wind direction. Bedrock outcrops

were often found on the windward side of the sand dunes which

would indicate that the high rebel of the outcrop acted as a

deflection device to the windborne sand. The deflection of

the wind created wind turbulence causing sand to be deposited

on the lee side of the bedrock protrusion allowing a barchan

dune to develope.

Two major eskers traverse the area from north to south.

- 55 -

One divides the area roughly in -half and provides the natural

ballast supporting the north-south road that bisects the claim

group. This major esker has several sub-eskers and offshoots.

The other esker is a braided esker which forms separate eskers

east and west of Mouse Lake and trends southward in sinuous

pattern into Cabot Township. These eskers terminate in broad

lacustrine deltas and outwash plains.

The rest of the claims, especially where overburden is thin,

are mantled by a thin veneer of basal till in one or more

sheets. Where two till sheets have been noted it is possible

that both are part and parcel of the same till sheet merely

interdigitated by non-till debris.

Glacial striae have a general trend of 165 with local

variations which seem to indicate that glacial ice movement

was fairly constant. Local variations were caused by more

resistant bedrock.

- 56 -

t

STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY

The metavolcanic sequence has been folded into a series of

tight synclines and anticlines about a major synclinal axis.

The most probably cause for this tight folding would be the

upwelling of the felsic batholithic complex to the west. The

heavier komatiitic and mafic metavolcanic rocks would tend to

sink in the lighter felsic magma. This intrusion of magma would

cause warping of the folded sequence thereby causing secondary

folding to develope. When stress became great enough major

strike-slip faults developed such as the Marne Lake and Grassy

River Lineaments to the east, the Blair Lake Lineament in the

center of the group and the Mattagami River Lineaments to the

west. Batholithic complexes to the south and east caused the

folded metavolcanic sequence to become folded a second time into

a broad anticline around a north-south axis south of Little Marne

Lake.

Lineations have developed steeply toward the east/ Figure 6,

indicating some movement. Best estimates of movement are on

the order of 500 meters. No extensive shear or mylonite zones

were noted. Foliation has developed just north of east dipping

predominately steeply to the south, Figures 7, 8 and 9. Foliation

in general parallels bedding except where folding is very tight

and cleavage developes.

The dominant joints pattern is azimuth 20 to 40 dipping

50 to 70 south east while the secondary joint pattern is azimuth

- 57 -

Figure 6 - Projection of 49 lineations on the lower hemisphere of an equal area stereonet.

- 58 -

N

W

Figure 7 - Projection of 61 poles of foliation planes from the East Group on the lower hemisphere of an equal area stereonet.

- 59 -

2%

Figure 8 - Projection of 45 poles of foliation planes from the North Group on the lower hemisphere of an equal area stereonet.

- 60 -

N

W

2.5%

0%

Figure 9 - Projection of 40 poles of foliation planes from the South Group on the lower hemisphere of an equal area stereonet.

- 61 -

110 to 1300 dipping 80O southwest, Figure 10.

Most top determinations indicate a south facing series,

however, enough north facing top determinations were made to

indicate a series of tightly folded units. This series may be

the western limb of a much larger north trending synclinal

sequence, the axis of which trends north through Kemp and Mond

Townships, east of Burrows Township.

- 62 -

Figure 10 - Projection of poles of 41 joint planes on the lower hemisphere of an equal area stereonet.

- 63 -

METAMORPHISM

Regional metamorphism is greenschist to almandine-

amphibolite facies and contact metamorphism is albite-epidote-

hornfels facies.

Figure 13 is and ACF-A'FK Diagram with values calculated

from whole rock geochemical data listed on tables 9 and 10.

Diamond drill core on the West Group of claims indicated

garnets (almandine) in the mafic metavolcanic sequence.

Contact metamorphism is noted around the interface or

aureole of the Togo Batholith and the metavolcanic rocks.

Judging from the minerals observed in hand specimen, the

contact metamorphic grade is albite-epidote-hornfels facies

with mineral assemblage:

hornblende + epidote * albite * chlorite - biotite * quartz.

See Figure 13a on page 86.

Regional metamorphism of the metavolcanic rocks is

greenschist to almandine-amphibolite facies of the Barrovian-

type facies series.

For^the greenschist facies the quartz-albite-muscovite-

chlorite subfacies is characteristic with the mineral

assemblage:

Albite * epidote * chlorite * actinolite -f sphene -

stilpnomelane - quartz.

See Figure 13b on page 86.

For the almandine-amphibolite facies the most

- 64 -

characteristic subfacies is the sillimanite-almandine-

orthoclase subfacies. The mineral assemblage for metamorphosed

mafic metavolcanic and intrusive rocks is:

hornblende + plagioclase -t- almandine garnet - quartz.

For ultramafic rocks, the mineral assemblage is:

Anthopyllite, cummingtonite or gedrite -f hornblende * almandine

garnet - plagioclase.

or

Cummingtonite + tremolite

See Figure 13C on page 86.

Normative mineral calculations from whole rock geoche

mical data would greatly assist in metamorphic classification.

- 65 -

GEOCHEMISTRY

Total rock geochemical analyses of 34 rocks were used to

classify stratigraphic units and aid in the geological inter

pretation.

Analyses were done by X-Ray Assay Laboratories of Don

Mills, Ontario. Methods of analyses and detection limites for

X-Ray Assay Laboratories are shown on Table 3. Tables 4, 5,

and 6 tabulate siajor elements, minor elements (Cr0O,, Zr, Srtt 3

and Rb) and trace elements (Au, Ni, Cu, Zn, As and in addition,

CO ) respectively.

From major element data calculations for the Jensen Cation

Plot, AFM, ACF and A'FK diagrams were made, Tables 7 through

10 and the ternary diagrams plotted, Figure 6 through 8.

No gold values were anomalous, i.e.> 100 ppb. Komatiitic

rocks carried M40 ppm Ni and > 1500 ppm Cr O .

All iron tholeiitic intermediate and all calc-alkaline

rocks carried > 100 ppm Zr and > 40 ppm Kb (calc-alkaline basalts

did not exceed 20 ppm Rb). Both magnesia-rich and iron-rich

tholeiitic basalts carry values of Sr >100 ppm while calc-

alkaline rocks carry values of Sr > 180 ppm.

As, Cu and Zn background was l ppm, 40 ppm and 70 ppm

respectively while background for gold*: was 2 ppb.

- 66 -

X-RAY ASSAY LABORATORIES LIMITED

1885 LESLIE STREET* DON MILLS* ONTARIO M33 3J4

PHLNE 416-445-5755 TELEX 06-986947

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

TO: NEWMCNT EXPLORATION OF CANADA SUITE 2840* COMMERCE COURT W.* P.O. BOX 105* TORONTOt ONT. M5L 1E3

PEPORT 13740 REF. FILE

CUSTOMER NC. 432

DATE SUBMlTTfcO 18-NOV-B1 17-MAY-8226-ALG-82 l

9341-A5

34 *OCKS REC'D. FROM R.P.BOWEN PROJECT #285

HERE ANALYSED AS FOLLOWS*

AUC02WRMAJNICUZKASWRMIN

UNITSPPBZzPPMPPMPPMPPMPPM

METHODFADCPWETXRFAAAAAANAXRF

DETECTION LIMIT 2.000 0.100 0.010 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000

10.000

Table 3 - Methods of detections and detection limits.

DATE 21-OEC-81

X-RAY ASSAY LA&ORATQtyl ES LIMITED

CERTIFIED BY ,

- 67 -

X X RRRRR AXX XX RR RR AAAXX XX RR RR AA AAXXX RR RR AA AAXXX RRRRR AAAAAAA

XX XX RR RR AA AAXX XX RR RR AA AAX X RR R AA AA

TABLE 4

MAJOR ELEMENTS

NFWMONT

ll-DEC-8l

Q3-JUN-S2 22-SEP-82

SAMPLES RECEIVED FROM REF FILE 4t9341-A5

- 68 -

s/mr

9101

9102

9105

9113

9115

9116

9117

9122

9124

9126

9127

9128

9130

9131

9134

9135

9136

9137

9139

9140

9142

9143

9141

9145

9146

9147

9148

9149

9150

9J81

610?

510

49.8

50.2

59.6

70.3

49.0

70.1

51.8

511

47.8

53.0

51.4

52.7

57.8

55.3

51.8

439

419

4S7

49.0

47.9

51.9

50.0

50.5

47.2

60.6

70.9

5i7

48.6

4R2

ftL203

9.25

14.8

16.2

11.9

14.5

114

117

110.

112

117

150

15.2 '

12.9

IS 6

119

111

5.82

110

8.37

13.4

8.54

113

117

6.55

9.01

15.4

15.1

15.4

117

14 1

CftO t

9.04

7.17

8.50

6,62

105

8.08

3.47

9.03

6.64

10.4

4.24

9.22

8.01

4.16

4.47

7.95

6.46

8.46

10.1

10.1

a is

a 03

7.93

112

7.93

4.07

1.82

8,20

11.5

7.99

WO

11.4

6,72

7.S9

586

0.73

5.46

0.62

4.34

182

7.78

193

8.65

7.82

165

151

165

210

6,95

li 2

146

15.2

7.51

4.07

118

14.5

126

0.70

167

632

aw

NA20

1.42

L98

1.87

108

5.32

1.10

L92

142

135

171

4.24

157

3.72

3.64

4.76

151

0.21

178

0.46

1.60

1.59

L44

164

1.76

1.53

100

5.87

3.31

L 49

171

KM

170

0.47

0.32

0.56

1.70

0.35

1.38

0.21

0.40

1.97

0.10

0.21

0.66

1.25

0.14

1.81

0.03

0.91

0.27

0.22

0.07

a 73

0.27

0.08

0.08

1.42

L60

0.26

0.06

0.53

FI203

ass

14.8

10.2

9.21

3.28

19.5

7.27

15,2

117 -

10.9

114

9.44

11.1

8.55

B. 90

14.9

11.4

11.7

11. S

119

117

113

15,4

1L3

115

7.36

172

7.17

115

113

mo

0.16

0.33

0.18

0.14

0.05

0. 49

0.34

0.36

0.35

0.17

0.19

0.15

0.21

0.11

0.14

0.21

0.16

0.21

0.18

0.25

0.19

0.18

0.27

0.21

0.21

0.10

0.02

0.14

0.22

0.19

TIQ2

1.00

0.99

0.53

0.59

0.32

1.50

0.35

1.34

1.40

0.89

1.42

0.56

0.79

0.85

1.28

1.46

0.44

1.14

0.41

0.80

0.61

0.91

1.84

0.45

0.63

0.89

0.25

0.66

0.91

0.67

P205

0.22

0.09

0.03

0,10

0.08

0.14

0.09

0.12

0.14

0.10

0.14

0.03

0.21

0.21

0.16

0.19

0.04

0.37

0.07

o.oe

0.05

0.08

0.16

0.04

0.06

0.24

0.08

0.24

0.10

0.07

Lot tun

147 99.2

177 100.0

123 98.9

L93 99.0

100 100.4

100 99.9

L70 99.9

1. 31 99. 1

119 98.7

154 99.0

2.42 99.4

131 100.8

114 100.3

S. 70 100.4

5.93 945

1.39 100.1

8.31 98.7

154 98.9

4.08 99.7

7,93 100.7

185 99.9

154 99.9

177 99.3

1.85 98.7

193 98.5

500 100.3

131 100.3

5,47 100.5

13? 99. 3

3. 47 9t. 1

11-DEC-*! X-ftAY ftSSAY LABORATORIES- 69 -

SWLE SI02 dm CM MOO NA20 00 FE203 WO TI02 P205 LOI OH

9182 486 112 11,4 820 1.49 0.2* 11.5 ft 18 0.55 0.06 2.93 98.5

9184 506 11.9 11.3 6.90 2.40 0.98 7.91 0.15 0.48 0.29 1 39 100.7

9185 49.0 113 10.0 6,17 2.48 0.22 11.1 0.23 0.71 0.07 7.A2 100.9

9184 45.1 12.4 895 7.42 1.32 0.34 RO 0.31 0.72 0.07 10.) 100. fL

Table 4 - Major element analyses.

- 70 -

VAV ASSAY

SAMPLE

9012

9013

?109

9114

9119

9120

9121

9183

9190

9191

9192

9195

9196

9197

9198

9199

LftKRftTGRI

S 102

16 4

49.3

37.7

48.8

51.3

70.7

73.3

46 4

49.3

77. 1

51. 1

45.5

46.9

54.1

51.2

46.9

IS

A1.203

13.4

12 7

11.2

14.0

14 2

14 9

14.7

15.1

14.5

12.3

14.4

10.6

20.3

13.0

13.8

14.4

03-JUH-82

GAO

6.79

7.63

5.29

11.0

9.70

2.26

2.59

6.22

10. 1

0.94

5.89

7.64

10.6

5.62

6.45

11.0

(V30

6.09

3.S8

5 59

7.02

7.18

0.95

0.52

7.61

7.48

0.95

6.04

16.8

4.82

4.02

4.84

5.87

FErGRT 1

NA20

3.18

2 03

0.21

2.46

2.37

6.07

4.6P.

3.20

1.S8

6.32

2.57

1.19

2.20

3.99

3.38

1.84

K20

0.45

0.13

0.03

0.20

0.53

0.62

1.73

0.45

0.45

0.17

0.46

0.35

0 44

0.23

0.29

0.14

i?03 REFERENCE

FE203

18.6

19.9

31.2

13.6

11.2

2.78

2.34

12.7

33.8

1.78

15.2

13.3

11.0

15 4

14.7

15.6

m

0.40

0.26

0 13

0.21

0.16

0.03

0.03

0.19

0.20

0.03

0.21

0 21

0.15

0.28

0.26

0.20

FILF 10567

TI02

I 69

1.91

0.49

0.76

0. 33

0.27

0.20

0.71

O.S6

0. 14

0.90

0.62

0.79

1.77

2 00

1.34

P205

0.12

0.14

0.23

0.05

0.20

0.07

0.07

0.05

0.07

002

0.07

0.05

007

0.15

0.16

0.12

CR203

0.00

0.01

0.10

0 03

0.03

0. 01

0. Oi

0.00

0.02

0.01

0.00

0. ?0

0.02

000

0.00

001

101

1.77

J. ?3

8. 31

l 31

2. OS

0.77

v 93

6.38

1.04

0 J3

3 W

3.70

3.31

1 93

3.00

262

SUM

93 9

9?. 2

i 00 5

9?. ft

i 00. 3 .

99 -l

i 00. 6

9? l

100. 3

100 7

??.9

100. i

100. 6

SCO. 5

100. 2

100 0

9202 47.8 14.4 9.14 2.73 2.96 0.28 140 0.34 127 0.12 O.Ot 623 9? l

- 71 -

RFPORT 15900 HOTttWE Fllf. 11522

HW1 NfttO K70 FF2(J3 KNO TI02 P7G5 OR203 L01 SUM

4.82 198 0.70 13.7 0.26 1.07 0.09 0.02 2.39 98.4

276 1,78 3 06 9.75 0.15 0.55 0.08 0.02 1.70 99.0

4. 'fi 4.91 AM 1.11 872 0.17 0.69 0.31 0.02 3.54 98.7

707 15.2 7.95 0.119 5.18 1.45 ?. 41 0.03 0.23 0.07 0.01 0.70 99.6

7.75 9.69 2.01 2.45 11.? 0.17 0,83 0.71 0.05 5.39 98.7

1.97 1.15 6.52 1.37 2.18 0.02 0.32 0.10 0.01 0.85 99.3

1FRAY ASSAY 1 1

SAMPLE

9205

9206

9207

9232

9518

9536

9758

9759

9760

9761

9762

97fc3

9764

9765

8107

48.9

57. 4

M. 7

70 1

47 0

6V. 0

44.0

68.5

41.6

sa 4

56.7

47. 6

(6. S

4V. 0

n m

16.7

15.3

i 4 r.

15 7

11.4

15. 7

7.98

15 4

6.57

18.0

16.4

9.16

11.8

11 8

77-SK

WO

6.7V

12.0

4 79

7.9?

7.75

1.97

6. W

1.04

5.7.'

aw

4.5(

R 95

6. W

R 4'

440 798 6. W) 21.6 0.21 0.11 12.0 0.18 0.30 003 0.22 5.62 99.0

4.04 0.64 4.31 1.70 1.89 0.04 0.78 0.07 0.01 1.47 98.4

6.57 5.73 21.8 0.15 0.10 11.6 0.21 0.27 0.03 0.28 12.7 100.6

a W A 26 7.03 1.77 a ?5 0.09 0. 0.10 0.00 2.85 98,6

56.7 16.4 4.50 7.10 4.66 7.41 5.69 0.07 0.83 0.16 0.01 5.16 98.7

17.6 9.16 8.99 18.3 0. 18 0.11 12.2 0.18 0.28 0.04 0.21 8.08 100.4

6.H6 7.89 3.06 1.13 888 0.13 0.62 0.20 0.05 Z 47 98.6

4V. O 11.8 R 44 7.56 3.94 0.16 11.8 0.17 1.02 0.27 0.05 7.93 98.2

- 72 -

X X RRRRR AXX XX RR RR AAAXX XX RR RR AA AAXXX RR RR AA AAXXX RRRRR AAAAAAA

XX XX RR RR AA AAXX XX RR RR AA AAX X RR R AA AA

TABLE 5

MINOR ELEMENTS

NEWMONT

ll-DEC-01

SAMPLES RECEIVED FROM REF FILE *934 l-AS

U-DEC-fil

s/mf

^ 9101

^ 9102

9105

9113

9115

9116

9117

9122

9124

9126

; 9127

9128

9130

9131

9134

9135

9136

9137

9139

9140

9142

9143

9144

9145

9146

9147

" 9148

9149

9150

9181

X-RAY ASSAY LABORATORIES

CR203

690

430

750

360

170

150

260

150

170

450

120

590

700

290

240

160

3280

390

2700

330

.1780

380

140

640

1810

330

160

290

420

270

7R

40

50

0

40

130

70

160

60

60

40

80

0

50

140

100

160

0

90

20

30

10

40

90

0

10

120

70

130

30

0

SK

180

50

110

140

180

60

180

SO

110

140

130

150

210

100

200

210

100

380

SO

80

0

150

120

20

10

180

560

300

290

170

- 73 -

re70

20

10

20

40

0

40

10

10

80

0

0

10

40

10

40

0

40

0

10

0

20

0

0

0

SO

50

20

0

0

- 74 -

X-ftAY ASSAY LABORATORIES

CR2Q3 IR SR RB

9182 220 10 200 O

MM 560 80 300 10

9185 310 20 70 10

9186 3?0 20 40 O

Table 5 - Minor elements analyses.

- 75 -

X-RAY ASSAY

SAMPLE

9012

9013

9109

9114

9119

9120

9121

9183

9190

9191

9192

9195

9196

9197

9198

9199

9202

LABORATORIES

RB

0

0

0

0

20

10

10

10

30

0

0

0

10

0

10

0

10

SR

W

100

30

90

230

HO

HO

50

IfcO

70

100

20

300

50

120

120

80

03-JUN-82

7R

100

100

0

30

70

HO

110

10

40

210

20

20

20

80

100

-70

50

REPORT 14903 REFERENCE FILE 10567

- 76 -

X-RAY A?sSAY 1 1

SAMPLE

9205

9206

9207

9232

9518

9.536

9758

9759

9760

9761

9762

9763

9764

9765

wwntwi

RB

20

W

30

W

60

tt)

0

U)

0

60

VO

0

70

0

SR

170

f.70

650

480

380

9?0

0

160

110

390

J80

30

J 30

290

22-SFP-

7R

60

Mi

170

W

i 00

90

0

i M

0

130

130

0

W

120

REPORT 15900 ffiFFJffNCE FILE 11S22

- 77 -

A^SSM

SAKPLE

9101910291059113911591169117912291249126912791289130913191349135913691379139914091429143914491459146914791489149915091819182918491859136

r LABORATORIES 21-DEO61

AU PPS

rtrt72

14rtrtrtrt3

rtrtrtrtrt463

rtrtrtrtrtrtrtrt2

rtrtrt2

rtrtZ2

REPORT

C02 K

1.10.31.01.31.20.40.1l.B1.30.90.30.60.53.23.40.42.21.82.14.20.40.11.1

CO. l0.12.2O.B2.00.50.30.75.24.95.1

13740 REF

Nl .PPM

-——— -———-———— ~————-*17

60047—— —14046——160————— ——————

. FILE

CU PPM

256222663075201601601209223663257

120651209997478777534941B

4897971801077130

9341-A5

ZN PPM

977054331607056441104792403987

100S3397356773749982948652768716015476)7B

AS PPM

21131OO

12

CIl

< 11

ci12247513637161356

17< 1<l< l

Table 6 - Trace element and analyses.

- 78 -

ASSAY LABORATORIES 03-JUN-82 REPORT 14903 REF. FILE 10567-B2

SAMPLE AU PPB C02 * NI PPM CU PPM IN PPM AS PPM

90129013910991149119912091219183919091919192919591969197919891999202

131

CIl11

ciCI2

CI1

CICICICI3

CI

0.10.24.30.1O.B0.10.12.40.1

CO.lCO.lCO.l0.20.20.2

CO.l3.3

—————- ———*—~240—18-r-

——

..

190180555336197

20100

57273110739211099

5556

17024322536473116893767991207170

322122

C 12 ,122163211

- 79 -

X-RAY ASSAY LA&CRATCRlfcS 22-SEP-82 REPORT 15*500 REF. FILE U522-T2

SAMPLE AU PPB C02 t CI PPM ZN PPf AS PPM

920592069207923295189536

97539759976097619762976397649765

3aiau4

13U

121

1CI1

0.80.41.60.33.00.5

0.21.87.52*04. B2.6C. 65.7

97HO446

2811

551862120386

5882

69297212ei58

26521951656751

100

111122

465

172aa38

NEWMONT- DU PONT JOINT VENTURE

PROJECT- 285

BURROWS TOWNSHIP

Fe 2 O 3 * TiO2-so-

90

JENSEN CATION PLOTFigure It

* Denotes thin section.

20 .80

30 70

^yv

7 Q 9109

A7 ^ - 09116

/\ r^ \ Iron -rich7 \ \"\ \ 9197Ep 9 '44 EJ9O12

7 ^ \ 0J?122 JL /*\\x 92O20 \ Tijajeiitic Basalt

7oZ......................... ^ ^!^*^ffl*lo.^..a.w...

Z \09117 9206(^X09134 X^^bL10^^./5

Z \ O^^JS^l^ ^919\) 0 * 207\ 91 9*84 9182 9

^""^••^

r^-0' \^A** \ \MH912\ \ \

\ rt^CN

\ \

~7\

\ \""". ^4 h '

l f f*. X9518 r-TV, C 7

0 Basaltic "** 0J3JE 9i4s '^^/C^/

(Pyroxene) — S'195 09139 ' ^i •iv /o J '— 9T5B y

Komatiite 0976o 3 0V34* X

7 x,170''^7 ^//* ' ' ^

30

20

1O

R.RB.

FGRAPHSAMPLE910191029105911391159116911791229124912691279126Q130913191349135913b91379139914091429143914491459146914791489149915091819182918491R59186

1 - Jensen PlotCODE

123456789

1011121314151617le192021 -2223242526

12345678

FEO+FE203+T10220.3930.0720.9724.3612.9640.8026.5436.2631.6023.4531.3219.5524.9024.0126.1135.4218.2427.2221.0731.3824.6326.8838.0124.7424.6622.347.3119.3127.6724.6524.4820.5326.3530.01

AL20330.9644.3449.4946.4781.7637.9269.1344.7046.7045.7148.4046.6242.4162.4555.9144.5114.0643.2222.7848.1623.0242.5244.0321. 5S24.7165.3887.4956.2346.1741.8442.0745.6946.25J9.74

M&O 48.65 25.59 29.55 29.175.29 21.274.34

19.02 21.70 30.85 20.26. 33.83 32.69 13.54 17.98 20.0867.7029.5656.1520.4752.3530.5917.9653.6850.6512.265.20

22.4526.1733.5033.4533.7827.3930.24

- 82 -

GRAPHSAMPLE90129013910991149119912091219183919091919192919591969197919891999202

lCODE

123456789

1011121314151617

FEO+FE203+T102 AL20337.94 39.2944.14 40.1752.40 29.1228.48 43.6824.73 45.7810.77 82.519.81 86.17

25.67 45.2728.01 43.458.30 83.50

31.71 44.5221.63 25.8922.22 59.6737.72 44.6334.74 45.1332.97 44.1435.31 52.10

HGO 22.77 15.68 18.48 17.84 29.496.714.02

29.07 28.548.21

23.78 52.46 18.11 17.65 20.12 22.89 12.59

iJRiF-IKPLr92C592C692C79 2?. 2C 5189526

1ccce

12•a

456

97*8

9762 C763 3764 9765

e9

1C1112131415

FEC+FE2C3+T1C2 AL2C329.25 51.7025.88 60.2622.A3 54.159.53 86.21

24.39 36.298.50 83.69

18.10 18.427.84 87.54

16.02 15.66is.ea 65.li17.97 70.6119.66 22.6121.68 . 42.3127.56 29.93

HOG 19. C5 13.67

397

3282

63. 4c 4.62

66 .32 15. C2 11.51 57. l z 26.01 32.51

NEWMONT- DU PONT JOINT VENTURE

PROJECT - 285

BURROWS TOWNSHIP

F e O -l- O.8998 Fe 2 O 3- 83 -

9109

AFM DIAGRAM

Figure 12

9O130

3O

40,

SO

70,

80.

09121

09759

09115

Q 912O

95361

Q9148

19191

90.

vV09761

9,0,

09206

09,34

J9186

H 09190

091*2

0920709137

.- 09126t3*13009149

H E95180^,34

09764

091O1

10

R. P. B.

GR t PHSftMPLE

tjJOj4P0 ?910591139115911691179122912491260 127912b913091319134913591369137PI 39Q 140

9142914301449145P146914791489149915091819162918491859186

.fc - AFM Diagram

CODE123456789

1011121314is1617181920212223242526

12345678

- 84

f31.7859.2348.6549.3427.5971.6862.4766.2756.4646.1956.9142.6345.0550.5148.7859.9831.5947.4237.7564.8442.2153.3265.8441.0642.9749.7615.9443.9253.6947.8750.8942.3553.0558.13

A21.1410.8911.2915.7365.555.96

31.5912.7119.6117.3020.1813.9519.7332.0829.8719.280.73

21.173.39

10.195.70

10,4514.807.445.71

33.2276.8324.298.23

14.026.60

16,5714.297.65

H47.06 29.Bb 40.06 34.93 6.87

22.36 5.95

21.02 23.92 36.51 22.92 43.42 35.22 17.41 21.35 20.74 67.68 31.41 58.85 24.97 52.09 36.23 19.36 51.49 51 .32 17.02 7.23

31.79 33.08 38.11 40.50 *,1.07 32.66 34.23

Calculations for AFM Diagram.

- 85 -

GRAPH 2SAMPLE CODE9012 19013 29109 39114 49119 59120 69121 79183 89190 99191 109192 119195 129196 139197 1*9198 159199 169202 17

F63.2774.81B2.8155.8348.312*. 6723.3050.4355.9017.7160.14

i 39.36S 57.111 62.72

60.8764.0967.91

i

A 13.729.010.71

12.14 16.45 65.97 70.94 16.07 10.47 71.78 13.325.08

15.18 19.09 16.889.06 17.42

H23.0116.IB16.4832.0334.749.375.76

33.5033.6310.5126.5455.5627.7118.1922.2626.8514.67

C3 t F I-S 1 K f L '92C592Cc-92C792? 2

2CCCt

1234

95?6

97? 9 976C

. 95

1C111213

C 7 * -

F59.24 55.27 44.74 23.10 41.57 17.33

33.03 2C.37 32.C9 39.10 35.83 37.10 3S.91 52.30

A17.65 27.34 27.26 7C.62 18.42 71.72

o.se71.?t0.77

43.7249.4b

0.9620.88l C. 3 6

Ki3.ll 17.39 28.OC6.26

40.01 10.45

fc5.99 7.6t

67.14 17.17 14.7C ol .92 39.31 37.2e

70"TV 60~7T 50

9206

3*207

-.9124 7113

H* 101913O

]9O12 J9TO9

914291451

M 39

J9758

1976019136

09760

Q 913*

4cRno*r* F F

FIG. a Albite-epidoce-hornfels fades. Andalusite may occur la the highest temperature part of this facies. w:nkl*r (1*76)

A* Mnctrltt

FIG.' t. (B 1.1) Quartz-atbite-muscovlte-chlorite subfacies of the greenschist fades. The minerals in parentheses can appear only when the mole fraction of CO? in the fluid phase (Jfco J happened to be very small, c.x.. In the metamorphism of carbonate- free basic rocks. In such a case, die dashed tie lines tremolite/actinollte to epidote or to chlorite are valid, Chloritoid or stilpnomelane may be generated only if certain particular chemical conditions are fulfilled. From Fig. 23, although not from Fig. 22, It can be seen that muscovite may appear along with stilpnomelane. Paragonite may also be present. The chemical composition of the chlorite* may vary within the limits shown by the thick line on tba AF side. If die composition of tbe chlorite is different from that shown in die present case, die tie lines to dolomite, calcite, etc., are also shifted correspondingly. This is suggested by die cross hatching across die tie lines.

ACF - A'F K DIAGRAMFigwr* 13 R. P. B.

90A

80A

70

097590914S

(71 (39121 9232

09536Q9115

09120

60A

50"TV" 40"A"

09791 09762

091170914?* 206

09131

09761 J0 9196

9149\H 09207

[7J 9101

092O609196

^?J 35H91490

914OQ. 9126^- ~

91500^*'•"^fe

9182

09134 09127

9119

09184

09109

091O1

09146

t) Q919S 09T39 *763

145

09760

09136 30

20

10

A l-O,9O

NEWMONT-DU PONT JOINT VENTURE

PROJECT- 285

BURROWS TOWNSHIP

Sltlmtnllt

A A'

097590914*

Q O9121 9232

0953609115

Trrndltt F F

Ct/mninglnillt

PIG. e (S 2.3) Sllllmanite-almandlne-orThoclase subfacies of the almandine- amphi bolite facies. Epidote * plagioclase are no longer compatible here, wvnklcr df Tt)

0911709762

(3*1*7

091099l81H9ai2Baa9-*9— 9116

9137

09101

09146

^) 09195 09139 *763

7009145

8O

90

GRAPH 3 - ACF DiagramSAMPLE CODE A 'C F

9101 l 40.90 19.90 39.20**102 2 50.27 13.3* 36.399105 3 49.31 17.11 . 53.589113 4 47.78 17.40 34.829115 5 70.02 11.46 18.519116 6 49.29 13.55 37.16911? 7 63.23 12.30 24.469122 8 48.32 17.52 34.16Q124 9 49.46 15.15 35.399126 10 47.61 19.69 32.70Q127 11 52.59 10.08 37.33,9178 12 45.56 19.08 35.369130 13 43.98 18.25 37.789131 14 58.67 13.13 28.209134 15 52.19 14.36 33.459135 16 50.46 15.82 33.729136 17 30.41 11.78 57.819137 18 44.30 19.74 35.969139 19 34.47 18.29 47.2*9140 20 48.29 20.03 31.6391*2 21 36.49 14.64 48.679143 22 47.91 16.00 36.0991*,4 23 48.93 16.23 34.849145 24 30.70 25.36 43.959146 25 37.59 14.51 47.919147 26 60.47 13.86 25.6591*8 l 74.26 12.25 13.490149 2 49.10 22.63 28.279150 3 46.09 21.53 32.369181 - 4 46.12 15.60 38.289132 5 43.36 21.96 3^.689184 6 v 40.21 27.78 32.019185 7 45.36 21.02 33.629186 8 46.32 16.68 47.00

Table 9 - Calculations for ACF Diagram.

- 88 -

GRAPHSAMPLE90129013910991149119912091219183919091919192919591969197919691999202

3CODE

1Z3456789

1011121314151617

A45.83 47.14 47.68 42.64 42.98 66.19 70.62 46.92 44.33 67.96 48.59 35.77 51.56 47.17 47.23 44.61 47.75

C12.8014.187.94

20.9421.2614.1015.1313.2218.948.96

12.0813.6320.4213.3114.5520.0319.72

F41.3738.6844.3836.4235.7619.7114.2539.8636.7323.0539.3450*6028.0239.5338.2235.3632.52

AK92C 292929595

979797S797Q79797

P L- CCCEC5 106 2C7 332 418 53fc 6

56 8f 9 S60 1Ctl 1162 1263 1364 14ftS 15

A53.4552.8753.8769.9743.417C.C9

33.51. 68.8932.4057.8361 .7235.544*.3744.13

C13.43 24.1C13.44 16.CO 19.02 12.66

11.6319.969.53

11.7515.6315.2217.7818.84

F33.13 23. C3

37.5617.24

11.13 SB. 07

27.85

tGRAPH

SAMPLE•M0191029105911391159116911791229124912691279128913091319134913591369137913991409142914391449145914691479148914991509181 -918291B491859186

Table

4 - A'FK DiagramCODE

123456789

1011121314151617181920212223242526

12345678

- oy -

A46.6757.4559.0456.9072.2356.6568.5858.3157.4256.7258.3556.0052.9065.0160.6557.6534.4553.9541.9560.1042.6956.105B.0541.0443.8967.0476.3862.9458.6353.9855.2355.0157.1155.19

i 10 - Calculations for A'FK Diagram

i

f44.7341.5940.2041.4719.1042.7126.5341.2241.0838.9641.4143.4745.4431.2638.8738.5365.4943.8057.4739.3757.1742.2641.3358.7555.9428.4513.8736.24tl. 1844.8044.1643.8042.3344.08

KB. 600.960.75l .648.670.644.900.471.494.320.24 .0.53l .663.730.483.820.062.250.580.530.151.640.610.210.174.519.740.82O. 191.210.611.190.560.73

- 90 -

GRAPHSAMPLE90129013910991149119912091219183919091919192919591969197919891999202

4CODE

123 i4 i56789

1011 i1213 S14 j15 11617

A52.0854.7951.7753.6853.8474.0375.0153.5054.1473.4554.7041.1264.1354.0954.8955.6259.06

F47.01 44.95 48.19 45.65 44.80 22.05 15.13 45.44 44.86 24.9144.2858.1834.8445.3344.4144.0840.22

K0.910.260.040.471.363.939.861.061.001.641.020.701.030.570.700.310.72

GRAPHSAPPLE

l 9205j 92C6, 92C7; 9232

9518, 9536

! 975897599760976197*2976397649765

ACCDE

123456

69

1C1112131415

A60.8064.5359.7276.6550.7273.88

37.8478.3135.7463.0067.1941.8352.2754.15

F37.68 28.11 36.24 15.36 43.89 18.17

61.95 12.66 64.C633.C9 24.66 57.95 44.58 45.45

K1.517.364.047.995.AC7.95

0.21 9.04 0.2C 3.9C 8.15 C. 22 3.15 0*40

- 91 -

The most valuable asset of total rock geochemistry was in

the sorting out of stratigraphic units. This is especially

helpful where outcrop is sparce or where chloritization and

other forms of alteration have made many of the rocks similar

in appearance, however, with some experience the color and

hardness techniques proposed by Jensen (1976) to classify

rocks in the field works amazingly well.

Further total rock analyses on a wider scale covering

more rock units especially on the East and North Groups will

further assist in sorting but the structure"'in .that area.

Diamond drill core should be submitted for total rock

analysis as well so units may be correlated both between

drill holes and with outcrops. Gold mineralization is likely

confined to a particular stratigraphic unit and this unit

may be related to or in contact with another unit that can

be easily traced. Total rock geochemistry could assist an

exploration team in locating and tracing economically

favourable horizons.

- 92 -

STRATIGRAPHY

Several workers have attempted to determine a stratigraphic

sequence for the area north of Burrows Township, notably the

Timmins area. Pyke (1978a and b, 1982) determined a strati

graphic sequence for the Timmins area based on chemical data.

In summary, his sequence was based on two volcanic cycles

of three periods, each with a continuous sedimentary process

depositing intervolcanic sedimentary units. The older

sequence was named the Deloro Groip and comprised three

volcanic formations. These were termed: (1) Lower Volcanic

Formation composed of ultramafic rocks engulfed in weakly

foliated diorite centered around the Shaw Dome; (2) Middle

Volcanic Formation composed of calc-alkaline basalts and

andesites with pyroclastics dominating the upper part of the

sequence; and (3) Upper Volcanic Formation composed of calc-

alkaline rhyolitic and dacitic tuff and lapilli-tuffs. The

next younger group was named the Tiedale GfO'Up and again

comprised three volcanic formations. These were termed:

(1) Lower Volcanic Formation consisting largely of peridotitic

and basaltic komatiites at the base and interlayered komatiites

and magnesium tholeiitic basalts in the upper part; (2)

Middle Volcanic Formation consisting of mainly iron tholeiite

basalts; and (3) Upper Volcanic Formation consisting

dominantly of felsic calc-alkaline pyroclastic rocks. Some

overlap between formations does exist.

- 93 -

Stratigraphically, the rock sequences from east to west

are: the Lower Tisdale komatiitic volcanic rocks in and

around Little Marne Lake surrounded by magnesium and iron tholeiitic

basalts of Middle Tisdale with interfingerings calc-alkaline

volcanic rocks west and south of Little Marne Lake; a series

of magnesium and iron tholeiites trend west through Ottereyes Lake

to Mouse Lake and a series of magnesium and iron tholeiites are

bounded to the east and west by Upper Volcanic Formation calc-

alkaline volcanic rocks on the South Group of claims.

The Tisdale Group hosts the major,gold deposits of the

Timmins area.

Figure 14 demonstrates a proposed regional stratigraphy

for the Burrows Township area extended from work done by

Pyke (1982) to the north.

What has become apparent from this study is that the

Tisdale Group, as proposed by Pyke (1982), is indeed present

in Burrows Township. This does not mean that economic gold

deposits definitely exist, but, at least the rocks Are right.

- 94 -

Figure 14 - Regional stratigraphy of the Timmins - Gogama - Matachewan area, modified after Pyke (1982).

- 95 -

GEOPHYSICS

Initial planning of the claim group to be staked by

Newmont, connecting the East and West Groups, optioned from

the Sirola-Karvinen partnership, was based on the aeromagnetic

data from the Sinclair Lake Aeromagnetic sheet ODM-GSC (1970),

Figure 14. This data indicates an inverted "U" shaped magnetic

high trending northeast from the southwest corner of Burrows

Township to Pond l east of Mouse Lake. The magnetic trend

then turns east then southeast passing into Kemp Township

southeast of Little Marne Lake. A splay trends northeast from

Pond l, then north along the west side of Sinclair Lake. This

is quite likely a gabbro sill. Several major breaks, shown

as magnetic low areas, have also been interpreted from this

data.

The strong aeromagnetic high trending northeast from the

southwest corner of Burrows Township to just south of Pond l

may be attributed to a magnetite-chert iron-rich unit. This

unit or units was traced in outcrop and from diamond drilling

done by Dowa (1974), Pickands Mather (1962), Dominion Gulf

(1951), Hollinger (1975) and Newmont (1982).

The magnetic high trending southeast from Pond l through

Little Marne Lake is caused by several rock units. At Pond l,

the iron-rich units are present and they terminate at the

north-south lineament that bisects the property. A diabase

dike swarm causes the magnetic high east of the above mentioned

j

l

X

Figure 15 - Aeromagnetic map of Burrows Township. ODM-GSC (1970), Sinclair Lake Sheet, 286 (Rev.). Scale: 1:63,360

- 97 -

major break, while the magnetic high through Little Marne is

caused by a komatiitic metavolcanic sequence.

In order to aid geologic interpretation due to scarce

outcrop coverage, to delineate possible economic targets and

to fulfill assessment work requirements, Newmont decided to

conduct a ground magnetometer survey over the grid cut to

conduct the geological survey. Added resolution was obtained

from this survey which will be submitted for assessment work

credit at a later date. The iron-rich units are several in

number indicating either several disti.nct units, complex

structural deformation or a combination of the two. Being

that several distinct iron-rich rock types were found in

outcrop and by diamond drilling, the author favors the combi

nation reasoning.

The komatiitic sequence near Little Marne Lake was mapped

by the author and boundaries interpreted from the ground

magnetometer survey and diamond drilling by Paymaster (1957).

Diabase dikes were easily outlined magnetically and conformed

well with the geological survey.

Subsequent to the ground magnetometer survey, a VLF

electromagnetic survey was conducted over northeast-southwest

trending lines using transmitting station NAA Cutler, ME.

The northwest-southeast trending lines were surveyed by a

horizontal loop, Max Min II electromagnetic survey with coil

separation of 100 m and for additional detail and depth

- 98 -

penetration 50 m, 150 m and 200 m coil separations. Where dip

angle crossovers on the VLF EM survey had high field strength

correlations, several lines of Max Min EM were conducted over

the anomaly in an attempt to eastablish or rate it quantitatively.

These surveys will be filed for assessment work credit at a

later date. The conductors east of and south of Mouse Lake

were found to be iron sulfide-rich rock types by the geological

survey and from diamond drilling by Dowa (1974), Hollinger

(1975), Dominion Gulf (1951) and Newmont (1982). West of

Ottereyes Lake a conductor was delineated by VLF EM, however,

it was not substantiated by Max Min. Some IP may resolve it.

South of Little Marne Lake, the conductor delineated there

was a graphitic zone with pyrite associated with it. This

was determined from diamond drilling by Amax (1972) and

Newmont (1982). The conductor in the central part of Little

Marne Lake is likely a talc-chlorite zone in the komatiitic

sequence filled with water. Diamond drilling by Paymaster

(1957) passed through such a zone and the location

coincides with the conductor outlined by Newmont's EM survey

by both VLF and Max Min methods.

Selected areas over the conductors were chosen to be

surveyed by induced polarization on time-domain mode and resisti

vity. These surveys were conducted for the purpose of locating

possible disseminated sulfide zones to either side of a

conductive unit, pyrite associated with the graphite unit,

. 99 .

south of Little Marne Lake, was anomalous. Another zone of

high chargeability was within the komatiitic sequence northwest

of Little Marne Lake. Northwest of Bear Lake, a zone of

anomalous chargeability was drilled by Newmont (1982) and

found to be altered pyritized, silicified and epidotized

intermediate (calc-alkaline dacite) metavolcanic rock cut by

a diabase dike. Anomalous gold was not found in this rock.

Geophysical methods provided excellent tools to assist

geological interpretation and to delineate diamond drill

targets. Some more work over selected areas.will be needed

to provide additional detail before more diamond drill targets

are selected.

Water covered areas were picketed and surveyed after

freeze-up so that all possible targets could be delineated and

assessed.

- 100 -

ECONOMIC GEOLOGY

The prime exploration target was gold.

Mineralized zones in outcrop and quartz veins were sampled

and assayed for gold in ppb, copper, zinc and arsenic in ppm.

GOLD

Background gold was 20 ppb, copper 40 ppm, zinc 200 to

300 ppm and arsenic was not generally detected. Table 11 shows

assay values for 46 samples.

Comparing mineralized zones with till, heavy mineral non

magnetic and magnetic fractions, gold is generally anomalous

in the non-magnetic heavy mineral fraction indicating that

the gold mineralization is not exposed and is likely north of

the areas sampled and that gold is not in the magnetic zones,

however, one assay of a magnetic fraction from the South

Group reported 756 ppb. This indicates that the gold is in

either sulfide facies or sulfide carbonate iron-rich rocks

or in mineralized altered host rock, most probably in the

komatiitic sequence. If gold was tied up in quartz it would

likely have been carried off with the quartz in the light

fraction during heavy media separation. Anomalous gold

concentrations and the shape of observed gold particles indi

cate that the gold found in heavy media separation did not

travel too far from its source, probably on the order of

- 101 -

400 to 500 m, however, diamond drilling failed to detect the

source. Diamond drill log summaries are attached.in the

Appendix. Actual logs and assays will be submitted for assess

ment work credit at a later date. Suffice to say that all

iron-rich units, graphitic units and altered (silicified and

pyritized) zones were split, sampled and assayed for Au, As,

Cu and Zn. All sludges were assayed for gold. While results

were disappointing, the geophysical and overburden till sampling

program have delineated other target areas for stripping and

trenching, more detailed geophysics, mainly IP, resistivity

and horizontal loop EM. Should targets be defined, a diamond

drilling program will follow.

COPPER

Copper values are not significantly different regardless

where they came from i.e. till, mineralized zones or quartz

veins or heavy media non-magnetic fraction. A copper deposit

in this area is not likely.

ZINC

Zinc values are significantly higher in mineralized zones

that from till or heavy media non-magnetic fractions. Wiis

would indicate that zinc is not associated with gold. Zinc

- 102 -

minerals (sphalerite) must be fine grained as it was not noted

in hand samples. Zinc should be looked for in ironstones,

especially those that are sulfide-rich.

ARSENIC

Arsenic does not appear to be associated with rocks or

mineralization in this area.

IRON

Exploration by Pickands Mather for Rio Tinto Canex Ltd.

(D. McKay Option) in 1962 of the magnetite-rich ironstone

southeast of Mouse Lake concluded that the deposit was

approximately 44,000,000 tons of 28 to 36% soluable iron and

that the deposits was too small to be economically exploited.

SAND AND GRAVEL

Sand and gravel is plentiful throughout the area and

any building or construction will have a ready source of raw

material for ballast, fill and concrete aggregate.

- 103 -

BELL-WHITE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD.P.O. BOX |87. HAILEYBURY, ONTARIO TEL: 672-31O7

Qkrtifiratr of AnalgfitaNO. B365-81 DAT*: Novtfltb'er 10, 1981

SAMPLE^) OF: Rock(14) RECEIVED: Nov.ewber 1981

FROM: Mr. R. P. Bowen, Newwont Exploration of Canada Ltd.

Samp.No.

91034678

91101

28

912359

91328

Gold ppb

48122121975

68 * 172 *

11145

155

15

Copper ppm

46904472

1686

6272864

90381862

Zinc ppm

50727742560380929948046640427

8091933243319

Arsenic p pin

ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 25

* Checked.ND denotes not detected.

Table 11 - Trace element analyses of 46 rock samples.

IN *CCOROANCC WITH LONG -tSTABLISH tO NORTH AWCn'CAN CUSTOM. UNLCSS IT IS tPIC ir ICALLY STATED OTMr**.ISC COLD AND SILVCR VALUtS RC^ORTID ON TH14I SHtCTS MAVC NOT BtlN ADJUSTtD TO COHPfH. SA1I FOB LOtilS. AND C*lf.S IKMtRtNT IN TMt fIRt

ASSAY PROCESS

• ELL-WHITE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTC

- 104 -

BELL-^A/HITE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD.P.O. BOX 187, HAILEYBURY, ONTARIO TEL: 672-31O7

Qfcrttfirat? nf AnalgataNO. B409-81 DATE: December 16, 1981

SAMPLE (S) OF: Rock(l) RECEIVED: November 1981

FROM: Mr, R. P. Bowen, Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd.

Sample No.

9187

Gold ppb

14

Arsenic ppro

NO

Copper ppm

40

Zinc ppm

28

Note: ND denotes not detected.

IN ACCORDANCE WITH lONC .MT**LI*HID NORTH AMERICAN CUSTOM. UNLESS IT IS SPECIFICALLY STATIC OTHERWISE COLD AND SILVEN VALUK HEPORTCD ON TMCSI SHICTS HAVI NOT *tlN ADJUSTED TO COMPtN. • AT[ rOK LOSSES AND CAINS INHERENT (N THC FIRE

ASSAY PROCESS

BELL-WHITE ANALYTICAL. LABORATORIES LTD.

NO. Bil 4-82

SAMPLE(S) OF:

SAMPLE(S) FROM:

BELL-WHITE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD.P.O. BOX 187. HAILEYBURY. ONTARIO TEL: 672-31O7

ffirrttfirat? of AnalgsteDATE: May 26, 1982

Rock(2) RECEIVED: May 1982

Mr. P. Bowen, Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd.

SamP- No- Gold ppb Copper ppm Zinc ppm Silver ppm Arsenic

9209

9210

463

122

250

80

1284

376

1.0

0.8

N.D.

N.O.

N.D. denotes not detected.

IN ACCORDANCC WITH LONG -f STA*t ISHCD NORTH AMCR'CAN CUSTOM. UM.fSS 'T IS iPCCiriCALLY STATCD OT^IRAIbt GOLD *SD MLVIB VAlft* BtPORTCD ON Twtit SHIET& MAVl NOT P l l N ADJ^'S-TtD TO COMPtN. t*Tl lOK LOSStS AND GA -.s INHIRIST IN lnl HRE

ASiAV PROCtSS

BELL-WHITE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD.

- 106 -

BELL-WHITE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD.P.O. BOX 187, HAILEYBURY, ONTARIO TEL: 672-31O7

Qkrttfirat? af AnalgaiaN0. B148-82 DATE. June 21, 1982

SAMPLE (S) OF: Rock (22) RECEIVED: June 1982

SAMPLE(S) FROM: Mr. R. P. Bowen, Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd.

Sample

9204920892139219922092229223922492309241924592499250925192529253925492559256925792589259

Gold ppb

45915112719325366161126

1517

28225292227

1178219

Copper ppmV 20

9406

174 260 156 250 230 182 174 74

370 480 520 500 340 164 142 310 560 350

1400

Zinc ppm

2228215

167116413960013238

55226

2050344016505280119030402040178043601860738

* Samp.No. 9208 25 Arsenic ppm.

IN ACCORDANCE WITH LONC-ESTABLISHE D NORTH AMERICAN CUSTOM. UNLESS IT IS SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE COLD AND SILVER VALUES REPORTED ON THESE SHEETS HAVE NOT BEEN ADJUSTED TO COMPEN SATE FOR LOSSES AND CAINS INHERENT IN THE FIRE

ASS* r fAOCfSS.

BELL-WHITE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD.

BILL-WmTE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD.P.O. BOX 187, HAILEYBURY, ONTARIO TEL: 672-31O7

Qkritfiratr af AnalgaiaNO. B166-82 DATE: July 7, 1982

SAMPLE(S) OF: Rock(3) RECEIVED: July 1982

FROM: Mr. R. P. Bowen, Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd.

Sample No.

9298

9299

9300

Gold ppb

4

21

14

Copper, ppro

144

128

192

Z1 ne ppm

38

63

SI

Note: Arsenic analyses to follow.

IN ACCORDANCE WITH LONG.ESTABLISHED NORTH AMERICAN CUSTOM. UNLESS IT IS SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE GOLD AND SILVER VALUES REPORTED ON THESE SHEETS HAVE NOT BEfN ADJUSTED TO COMPEN SATE FOR LOSSES AND GA'INS INHERENT IN THE FIRE

ASSAY PROCESS

• ELL-WHITE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD.

- 108 -

BELL-WHITE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD.P.O. BOX 187, HAILEYBURY, ONTARIO TEL: 672-31O7

Gkrttfirai? 0f AttalgaiaNO. B166A-82 DATE: July 9, 1982

SAMPLE(S) OF: Rock{3) RECEIVED: July 1982

SAMPLE(S) FROM: Mr. R. P. Bowen, Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd.

Sample No.

9298

9299

9300

Arsenic ppm

5

ND

ND

ND denotes not detected.

IN ACCORDANCE WITH tONG TSTABUSHED NORTH AMERICAN CUSTOM. UMtSS IT IS SPfdflCALLY STATED OTHERWISE COLD AND SILVER VALUCS HFPOHTED ON THESE SHEETS HAVE NOT BttN ADJUMCD TO COMPtN- (ATE fOR LOSSES AND GAINS INHtRlMT IN THE FIRE

ASSAY PROCESS.

BELL-WHITE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD.

- 109 -

BELL-WHITE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD.P.O. BOX 187, HAILEYBURY, ONTARIO TEL: 672-3107

Qkrttfirat? of AnalgatBNO. B238-82 DATE: August 26, 1982

SAMPLE(S) OF: Rock(lO) RECEIVED: August 1982

SAMPLE(S) FROM: Mr. R. P. Bowen, Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd.

Samp.No.

95301

234

Gold ppb

36

7

10

11

93

Oz. Gold Copper ppm

8

54

19232

660

Zinc ppm

15

55

456105

1460

Arsenic ppm

ND

5

5

5

5

ND denotes not detected.

IN ACCORDANCE WITH LONG.ESTABLISHED NORTH AMERICAN CUSTOM. UNLCSS IT IS SPECIf ICALLY STATED OTHERWISE COLD AND SILVER VALUES REPORTED ON 1HISE SHEETS HAVE NOT BEEN ADJUSTED TO COMPEN SATE f OK LOSSES AND CAINS INHERENT IN THE FIRE

ASSAY PROCESS.

BELL-WHITE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD.

APPENDIX

- no -

TABLE OF DIAMOND DRILL HOLESPROJECT 285

BURROWS TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO

All BX wireline

B-82-1

3.66 meters drill casing

182.88 meters total depth

O - 3.66 Overburden

3.66 - 33.50 Mafic metavolcanics

33.50 - 41.96 Diabase dike

41.96 - 45.85 Oxide iron formation \

45.85 - 60.05 Mafic metavolcanics

60.05 - 61.29 Carbonitized and steatized komatiite

61.29 - 63.09 Sulfide iron formation

63.09 - 65.66 Mafic metavolcanics

65.66 - 99.94 Diabase dike

99.94 - 101.60 Mafic metavolcanics

101.60 - 111.54 Mafic-intermediate transition

111.54 - 161.13 Felsic-intermediate metavolcanics

161.13 - 166.64 Dirty oxide iron formation - chert-chlorite-magnetite, garnet

166.64 - 182.88 Series of mafic s felsic tuffaceous beds

- 111 -

B-82-2

9.75 meters drill casing

209.40 meters total depth

O - 9.75 Overburden

9.75 - 64.21 Mafic-intermediate metavolcanic tuffs fi flows

64.21 - 98.65 Series of graphite-pyrite-magnetite iron forma tions interlayered with chert Si metavolcanics. Some portions brecciated.These small iron formations are separated by a series of mafic metavolcanics.

98.65 - 140.02 Mafic metavolcanic tuffs fi flows with somesmall felsic intrusive dikes.

140.02 - 148.56 Oxide iron formation

148.56 - 155.59 Mafic metavolcanic tuffs fi flows

155.59 - 157.10 Carbonitized fi steatized komatiitic unit

157.10 - 157.85 Oxide with some sulfide iron formation

157.85 - 169.97 Mafic metavolcanic tuffs fi flows

169.97 - 170.37 Oxide iron formation

170.37 - 190.59 Mafic metavolcanic breccia-oxide iron formationfragments as well as mafic metavolcanic and felsic intrusive fragments. Pyrite associated with mafic matrix.

193.92 - 194.03 Oxide iron formation

194.03 - 195.99 Metavolcanic breccia

195.99 - 209.40 Gabbro

- 112 -

B-82-3

3.66 meters drill casing

105.77 meters total depth

0. - 3.66 Overburden

3.66 - 105.77 Metavolcanic breccia - mildly carbonitizedoriginal rock possibly magnesium tholeiite to calc-alkaline basalts.

Green fuchsite chips l-2mm in size for first 10 meters or so.

Breccia could be of tectonic origin. Fragments are oligomictic and could be fit back together in the absence of the carbonaceous and chloriticmatrix.

Pyrite is ubiquitous throughout the core length associated with the matrix. Several thin mafic flows or feeder dikes were noted.

- 113 -

B-82-4

3.05 meters drill casing

90.50 meters total depth

O - 3.05 Overburden

3.05 - 32.39 Altered mafic carbonitized metavolcanic breccia as in hole B-82-3.

32.39 - 47.11 Tuffaceous and tnetasedimentary units argillaceousand carbonaceous

47.11 - 55.32 Graphite with pyrite balls.

55.32 - 88.88 Tuffaceous and metasediTOentary units.

88.88 - 90.53 Komatiitic unit largely unaltered but fracturescontain serpentine.

- 114 -

B-82-5

18.9Q meters drill casing

137.16 meters total depth

O -18.90 Overburden

18.90 - 34.97 Altered felsic to intermediate tuff with localpyritic concentrations.

34.97 - 40.68 Mafic to intermediate metavolcanics with^.ocally disseminated pyrite.

40.68 - 41.67 Breccia zone

41.67 - 56.16 Felsic to-mafic series of tuffs with some flowunits.

56.16 - 61.57 Volcanic-sedimentary-exhalative zone with somegraphitic s pyritic zpnes.

61.57 - 91.14 Felsic-intermediate tuff-lapilli tuffs

91.14 - 93.16 Basaltic komatiite

93.16 - 118.41 Diabase dike

118.41 - 132.22 Felsic to intermediate tuffs K lapilli tuffs.

132.22 - 137.16 Felsic to intermediate tuffs s lapilli tuffswith K-feldspar s epidote alteration and fine disseminate pyrite.

- 115 -

B-82-6

3.66 meters drill casing

188.67 meters total depth

O - 3.66 Overburden

3.66 - 17.37 Mafic metavolcanic flow.

17.37 - 100.42 Mafic to intermediate tuffaceous metavolcanicunits with 1-5* disseminated pyrite fi quartz s carbonate veining.

100.42 - 101.69 Sulfide (pyrite-pyrrhotite) iron formation.

101.69 - 110.85 Mafic metavolcanic tuffs S flows

110.85 - 112.88 Oxide iron formation

112.88 - 132.52 Mafic metavolcanic tuffs

132.52 - 138.59 Carbonitized s steatized komatiite

138.59 - 157.38 Intermediate to mafic tuffs K flows

157.38 - 163.38 Series of sulfide (pyrite-pyrrhotite) withsome magnetite and garnetiferous bedded iron formations interlayered with mafic metavolcanic tuffs.

163.38 - 170.52 Felsic to intermediate tuff S tuff breccia.

170.51 - 188.67 Gabbro

- 116 -

REFERENCES

American Association of Petroleum Geologists

1961: Code of Stratigraphic Nomenclature, Am. Soc. of Pet, Geol. Bull, Vol 45, no. 5 (May), p 645-660.

Carter, M.W.

1980: Geology of Connaught and Churchill Townships, District of Sudbury; Ontario Geological Survey Report 190, 81p. Accompanied by Geological Map 2414, scale 1:31 6BO or l inch to *s mile.

Carter, M.W.

1981: shining Tree Area, Districts of Sudbury and Timiekaming, Ontario Geological Survey OFR 5346, 67 p., 2 tables, 8 figures and l map.

Gledhill, T.L.

1926: Grassy River Area, District of Sudbury; p.57-76 inOnt. Dept. Mines, Vol. 35, Pt.6, 102 p. Accompanied by Map 35j, scale l inch to 1H miles.

Goddard, E.N.,Trask, P.D., DeFord, R.K., Rover, O.N., Singewald, J.T. and Overbeck, R.M.

1948: Rock Color Chart; The Geological Society of America, Boulder, C.O., reprinted 1951, 1963, 1970, 1975 S, 1979.

Irving, T.N. and Barager, W.R.A.1971: A guide to Chemical Classification of the Common

Volcanic Rocks; Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Vol. 8, p. 523-548

Jensen, L.S.

1976: A New Cation Plot for Classifying Subalkalic Volcanic Rocks; Ontario Div. Mines, MP 66, 22p.

- 117 -

Lovell, H.L., de Grijs, Jan, and Ploeger, F.

1977: Burrows Township, District of Sudbury, Ontario Geolo gical Survey Prelim. Map P. 1218, Kirkland Lake Series, scale 1:15,840 or l inch to \ mile. Data compiled 1973, 1976.

Middleton, R.S.

1969: Remanent Magnetism and Magnetic Susceptibility in the Interpretation of Ground Magnetics, Jamieson Township, District of Cochrane, Ontario; Unpublished M.Se. Thesis, Michigan Technological University.

ODM-GSC

1970: Sinclair Lake Sheet, Sudbury and Timiskaming Districts, Ontario; Ont. Dept. of Mine - Geological Survey of Canada. Aeromagnetic Series Map 286 G (rev.). Scale l inch to l mile, Survey flown 1947, 1948, and 1949.

Pyke, D.R., Ayres, L.D., and Innes, D.G.

1973: Timmins-Kirkland Lake Sheet, Cochrane, Sudbury and Timiskaming Districts; Ont. Div. Mines, Geological Compilation Series, Map 2205, scale l inch to 4 miles.

Pyke, D.R., Naldrett, A.J. and Eckstrand, O.R.

1973: Archean Ultramafic Flows in Munro Township, Ontario; Geol. Soc. America Bull., Vol. 84, p. 955-978.

Pyke, D.R.

1978a: Geology of the Redstone River Area, District of Timis- kaming; Ontario Div. Mines, GR161, 75p. Accompanied by Maps 2363 and 2364, scale 1:31,680 or l inch to H mile.

Pyke, D.R.

1978b: Geology of the Peterlong Lake Area, Districts ofTimiskaming and Sudbury; Ontario Geological Survey Report 171, 53p, Accompanied by Map 2345, scale (1:50,000).

- 118 -

Pyke, D.R.1982: Geology of the Timmins Area, District of Cochranei Ontario Geological Survey Report 219, 14Ip. Accompanied by Map 2455, Scale 1:50 000, 3 Charts, and l Sheet Microfiche.

Winkler, H.G.F.

1976: Petrogenesis of Metamorphic rocksj Springer-Verlug, 4th edition, 334p.

- 119 -

ASSESSMENT FILE REPORTS

Data on file at the office of the Resident Geologist,

MNR, Kirkland Lake, Ont., and at the Assessment File Records

Office, 77 Grenville Street, Toronto, Ontario.

Amax Exploration Inc. - 1972

Canex Aerial Exploration Ltd. - 1971

Dominion Gulf Co. - 1951

Dowa Mining Co. - 1974

Hollinger Mines Ltd. - 1975, Toronto Report No. 63.3377

D. McKay (Rio Tinto Canex Ltd.) - 1962

Paymaster Consolidated Mines, Ltd. - 1957

Prospector's Airways Company Ltd. - 1962

Sirola - Karvinen - 1981

Sirola - Karvinen (Newmont option) * 1982

Geochemical and Expenditures)

cutting and geological

in the i entered

41PMSW88S2 2.5106 KEMPClaims-told] 900

Exploration of Canada Ltd. A-3776?Address33 Yonge St., Suite 3?0, Toronto, ON M5E 1T2

Survey Company

Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd,Date of Survey (from Si to)02 , 10, 81(31 07 82Day l Mo.J Yr. Cay Mo. l Yr.

Total Miles of line Cut132.^3

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)R.P. Bowen, P.O. Box 5010, PMS, South Porcupine, ON PON 1KO

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

Electromagnetic

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Sun

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Days per Claim

40

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

SInstructions

Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Data

9 August 1982Certification Verifying

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim

Prefix Number

L. 618941618942618943618944618945

618946618947618948618949618950618951618952622240622241_622242622243622244

6222456^2246622247-

622248.622249622250

Expend. Days Cr

Mining ClaimPrefix

L..Number

622251

622252

622253 tgripS 622254

1'i "^ *l'.'*?3"'*'": —————————————————————————————————————————————————————

&&Mt ^..^-.'l:t***W&-

622255622256622257622258622259622260622261622262622263622264622265622266622267

622268622269622270622271622272622273

Expend. Days Cr.

Total number of mining claims covered by thii report of work.

For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Recorded

Dale. Recorded

AUe 9 1982Date Approved ai Recorded

,Mining Rec*)i*r

Branch Oyftcior

1 hereby certify that j have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Parson Certifying

R. P. Bowen, P.O. Box 5010, PMS

South Po rev t?ine, ON PON 1KODate Certified -9 Aug. 1982

oUJJJJto Geochemical and Expenditures)/"^

^B The Mining ActType of Survey^sT

LlneK/cut^lng and geologicalClaim Holder IjbJP

Newroont Exploration of Canada Ltd.Address

33 Yonge St., Suite 370, Toronto, OH M5E 1T2Survey Company Date of Survey

Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd. 8a2v |\JS ^Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

R. P, Bowen, P.O. Box 5010, PMS, South Porcupine, (

"Expenditures" section may be enterec in the "Expend. Days Cr." jealumns

Do not use shaded areas below, f -fa QTownship or Area (\

Burrows Twp.Prospector's Licence No.

A-3776?

(from b to) Total Miles of line Cut\, \ n ML i8?, 132.43DN PON 1KO

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Special Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveysr-

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

.Magnetometer

Radiometnc,. Rf l f-^ *'iNiNG r,,,.

Expenditures (excludes pdwe/fei/idplr^ fc? nType of Work Performed I nU ^ Lia U

Days perClaim

40

Days perClaim

Days per Claim

' - . . i. '

W r pIf IUI l

Performed on Claim(s) J AM '3QC/ J/

Cal c

ulation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total Expenditures

S -5- 15

iiii

r.

iiI4|5|G^

Total )ays Credits

Instructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Mining ClaimPrefix

L.

. .; ' . •••: V-

||IS

Number

622274

622275

622276

622277

622278

6222?9

622280

622281622282

622283

622284

622285

622286

622287

622288

622289622290

622304

622305

622306

U 622 307^622308

^M- |"^-^4 w O 4* C, j \) 7

Expend. Days Cr.

For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Recorded

Data RecordedA1IO A 1BQO

Mining ClaimPrefix | Number

L. j 622310

aa

mm 8mlilillitXsSsliml

(622311622312622313622314622315622316

622317

622318

622319

622320

622321

622323

622324 "

622325

622326

622327

622328

622329

624494

624495

624496624497

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

f

Mining Recorder

Expend. Days Cr.

lift

if iit

I Date

l 99 August 1982Certification Verifying Repo

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Addran of Penon Certifying

P.O. BO* 5010i PMS

th Porcupine, ON POM 1KODan Certified

9 AUPC, 1982Certifi

Ontario Geochemical and Expenditures)

, ) The Mining Act

"Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr.'V*olumns.

Do not use shaded areas below'-ft *"3|Type c;f Surveys)LlRg ^^tlng and geological

Claim HoldfBBNewmont Exploration of Canada Ltd.

Address33 Yonge St., Suite 370, Toronto, ON M5E 1T2

Survey Company Date of SNewmont Exploration of Canada Ltd. g2 fi

Township or AreaBurrows Twp. ^

Prospector's Licence No.A-37767

urvey (from Si to) Total Miles of line Cut

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)H. P, Bowen, P.O. Box 5010, PMS, South Porcupine, ON PON 1KO

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side

and enter total (s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions

credits do not apply

to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

^0

Days perClaim

Days per Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected n columns at right.

Date9 August 1982

Certification Verifying Report of

ignature)

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work. 109/11(3

For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr, Recorded

Date Recorded

AUG 9 1982Date Approved as Recorded

.Mining Recorder /h y

Branch OlrectcV 1 '

l hereby certify that t have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

. Bowen, P.O. Box 5010, PMSSouth Porcupine, ON PON 1KO Oat* Certified

Aug. 1982

(jmaiiu

J - The Mining ActType of Survey^)

L1&3' cutting and geologicalClaim Haider^^^B

Newmoirc Exploration of Canada Ltd.Address

33 Yonge St,, Suite 3?0, Toronto, ON M5E 1T2Survey Company Date of S

Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd. g2y , ,

"Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." /columns.

— Do not use shaded areas below.Jf^ Lj.Township or Area f\ l

Kemp Twp.Prospector's Licence No.

A-37767

urvey (from Si to) Total Miles of line Cut

9.5Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

H. P. Bowen, P.O. Box 5010, PMS, South Porcupine, ON PON 1KOCredits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey, using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

40

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

Instruction!Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Date IReco

9 August 198Certification Verifying Report

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

in

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work. 9/118

For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Recorded

Date

9 1982Date Approved as Recorded

Mining Recorder

Branch Director

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the fact* set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true. *"*

Name and Postal Address of Person CertifyingR.P. Bowen, P.O. Box 5010, PI'S,

South Porcupine, ON PON 1KOOat* Certified

9 Aug. 1982

Ontario

- 120 -

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

AiNO

*

Type of Sui Township o Claim Hold

Survey Con Author of I Address of Covering Di

Total Miles

SPECIAL

•vey(s) Geology - linecuttingr Area Burrows and Kemp

er(s) Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd.

many Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd.Report R.P. Bowen

Author 142 Eric Gsc., Porcupine, Ontario

iles of Survey, 2 Oct. 1981 - 31 July 1982(linecutting to office)

ofT-inennt 132.43

, PROVISIONSCREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

DAYS~, 1-1 per claim Geophysical

r.-nlnpr.l 40

Geochemical

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit! do not apply to airborne turveyi)

MagnetOme**r F.l*-rtrnmaanptir RaHinmrtrir

DATE: 10

Res. Geol.

August 1982 s——— ^ft^

Oiialifirarinns *^- 0*0*? 'T

Previous SurveysFile No.

'—Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSEDList numerically '

. l - KL.-; ' :' - ' ~ : 618941{prefix) (number) L. 618942"

L. 618943

L. 618944

L - 'J. '

L. 6^894.6

L . ^mi

Jtf 618949

L. 618956

L. 618951

L. 618952

L. 620953

L. 620954

L. ' 622240

L. 622241

L. r 622242

L. 622243

L. ) 622244

L. - 622245

,,...........^......................6R22A6...........

t. 622247 ,

TOI AL OLAIMo , ——— - ——— —

I

r

'iS3

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS - If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations ———————————————————————-Number of Readings Station interval ________________________ T-in* spacing^^^^^^ Profile scale_______________________________—--—_____—Contour interval.

Instrument.

(iz; O

O

oH

NNH tf

Q W

Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ———.

ELECTROMAGNETKflnil ronfigiiratinn

("Yiil fipparatinn

Arriirary

Method: D Fixed transmitter d Shoot back Q In line Frequency ., ..— .—,

(ipecify V.L.F. nation)

D Parallel line

Parameters measured.

Instrument.Scale constant.Corrections made.

Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument ————-—————————————————————————————————-——— Method D Time Domain D Frequency Domain

Parameters - On time ^-———-^—-———-———-————— Frequency —————-Off time__________________________ Range.— Delay time ———— Integration time.

Power.Electrode array.

Q Z Electrode spacing .

Type of electrode

- 121 -

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

L.(prefix)L.

L.

L.

L. .

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

TOTAL CLAIMS

622248(number)

622249

622250

622251

622252

622253 '•""""•""•" |

622254 *

| 622255 |

622256 '"

622257 ia

622258

622259 .

622260

622261

622262

622263

622264

622265

622266

622267

622268

622269

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically " " *

L.(prefix)

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

622270(number)

622271

622272

622273

622274

622275

622276

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

622277

622278

622279

622280

622281

i

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

TOTAL CLAIMS

622282

622283

622284

622285

622286

622287

622288

622289

622290

622295

- 122 -

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED 1 List numerically

L.(prefix) .L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

TOTAL CLAIMS

622296(number)

622297

622298

622299

622300

622301 . |

622302 * .............................. j

622303 |

622304 'l

622305 j-

622306

622307

622308

622309

622310

622311

622312

622313

622314

622315

622316

622317

————————— ——~-

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED 1 Lilt numerically ~~ "

L,(prefix)

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

i L. '

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

L.

TOTAL CLAIMS————————————

622318(number)

622319

622320 1

622321

622322

622323 "S

622324 \

622325 1

622326 'Z

622327 a

622328i 622329

624494

624495

624496

624497

628514

628515

628516

628519

634109

634110

- 123 -

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

L. 634111(prefix) (number)

L. 634112

L. 634113

L. 634114

L. 634115

L. 634116 .

L. 643017

L. 643611

'

TOT A I, CI .AIMS US

1

irjjvt

Ja

1

t

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED ILift numerically ~ " "

(prefix) (number)

::::::::::::::::

TOTAT.CI.AIMS

s1Sw*

a

Vi*M

SELF POTENTIALInstrument————————————————————————————————————— Range.Survey Method ________________________________________-.

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC Instrument -———Values measured.

Energy windows (levels) ____________________________________- Height of instrument_________________________Background Count. Size of detector——-————-——^^—.——-———---—-..-—.——..^.^--—-.^——™—^--. Overburden ——-—————————-—.-—--————-——^—-.——.—-^—-^^-^^^^..—-.

(type, depth - Include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey———————————————————————Instrument —————————————————————————Accuracy——.————————..————.—^^^————Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s) ——— Instrument(s) —————

(specify for each type of lurvey) Accuracy—————————————————

(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used^———————^^^——————-———.—————-—.Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude———————————————————————————————Line Sparing Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Naturc of Material)

Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth————— Terrain————————

Drainage Development———————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODS

Values expressed in: per cent p. p. m. p. p. b.

a aD

Cu, Pb,

Others,—

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle)

Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used__

Field Laboratory Analysis No.(—————————

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis————

Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used -——

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory,— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used ————

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

GeneraL General.

1983 06 24 2.5106

Mr. George J. KoleszarMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources4 Government Road, EastP.O. Box 984Kirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2

Dear Sir:RE: Geological Survey on Mining Claims L 618941 et al

In the Township of Burrows

The Geological Survey assessment work credits as listed with my Notice of Intent dated May 24, 1989 have been approval is of the above date.Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours very truly,

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

D. K1nv1g:mccc: Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd

Burrows Townshipcc: Resident Geologist

Kirkland Lake, Ontario

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario Jove

1983 05 24

Your file:

Our file:

/

2.5106

Mr. George J. KoleszarMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources4 Government Road, EastP.O. Box 984Kirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with state ments listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one scopy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.

Yours very truly,

E.F. AndersonDirectorLands Administration BranchWhitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1316

D. K1nv1g7mc

Encl:

cc: Newmont Exploration of Canada Ltd. Burrows Township

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining 4 Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

845 (6/79)

For further Information, 1f required, please contact Mr. F.M. Matthews at 416/965-6918

J

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Notice of Intent

for Technical ReportsOntario

1983 05 24

2.5106

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Lands Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

ste J

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Technical Assessment Work Credits

Ontaij

File

1983 05 24

2.5106

Recorded Holder

NEWMONT EXPLORATION OF CANADA LTD.Township or Area

BURROWS TOWNSHIP

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Induced polarization

77/19)section aacpuf'

Geological 40

Geochemical

days

days

days

days

__ days

days

davs

Man days D Airborne D

Special provision L* Ground SI

[XI Credits have been reduced becausecoverage of claims.

Q Credits have been reduced because ofto work dates and figures of applicant.

77(16)

of partial

corrections

Mining Claims Assessed

L. - 618942620953622241622246622295622299622306622308624494628514628519634109643017643611

to 52, Inclusive. 54to 44, Inclusiveto 90, Inclusive

to 304 Inclusive

to 29, Inclusiveto 97, Inclusive. is

to 16, Inclusive

Special credits under section MXX9C& for the following mining claims

20 Days GeologyL. - 618941

622240 622245622296 to 98, Inclusive 622305 622307 528516 ^^.^^^^^

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

l l not sufficiently covered by the survey Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 60; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 86(181-60:

828

Ontario

Ministryof GeotechnicalReloulces RePort

Approval

File

Mining Lands Comments

"AX\MuL

DTo: Geophysics

Comments

l j Approved (""l Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

To: Geology - Expenditures "vK ^VvjTtJA^Comments

Approved |"~| Wish to see again with correctionsSignature

DTo: Geochemistry

Comments

Approved Q Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

To: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. {Tel: 5-1380)

1593 (81/10)

1982 10 25 2.5106

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources4 Government Road EastP.O. Box 984Kirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2

Bear Sir:

We have received reports and maps for a Geological Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims L 618941 et al in the Township of Burrows.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be issued

Yours very truly

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380

DW: se

cc: R.P. BowenPorcupine, Ontario

cci Newmont Exploration of Canada LimitedToronto, Ontario

Telephone (705) 264-4709 Telex 067-81612

NEWMONT EXPLORATION OF CANADA LIMITEDHollinger Office Building

P.O. Box 1430 TIMMINS, ONTARIO P4N 7N2

7 October 1982

RECEIVEDOCT 81982 -~

MINING LANDS SECTIONMr. Fred MatthewsMinistry of Natural ResourcesLands Administration BranchMining Lands SectionRoom 1617, Whitney BlockQueen's ParkTORONTO, OntarioM7A 1W3

Dear Mr. Matthews:

Enclosed please find two (2) copies of Newmont's geological

report for assessment work credit for claims in Burrows and Kemp

Townships. Attached are copies of the report of work forms with

claims listed. The geotechnical data sheets are at the end of the

reports as required.

Thank you for your service.

Sincerely yours,

R.P. Bowen Project Geologist

RPB/sd

Encl.

CjPf.-.- -: k'C'If f rtrfutH.^

y

q),

5 M. -

00LO 00

3M.

o <h-

2M

NURSEY TWP M.1031

5M. l M -2 20ch

-- 5M.

6Z0738|t20737 J620736

L if L 'L l L l L 620731 /.620732 '620733 ' 620 734 .620735 U

620238 t X~r2 qJ2;j9 .'620240 620241 '620242,r.- ~P~~r~U;7-~ -*- ~- -i — - -H- —---

L i L

620237(jGaO236 [62078S 1620784

620777 b62ffTT6 620775

647217 5472166472)5 J 622287 BZZZO,

211 '547212 1547213 l 547214

5472081 547207 622328 '622327 ,.-.Si — -JL

|62224\3 .622244 622290

6Z0953L6223I5 l 622316

l T i V l 622Z53 l 622252 l 622251

624497 624496 62462225S 1622256 ' 622257 l 622258 | 622259

(634IIZ J622263 ^622262L——rL63411

' 622264 16222

L

^ ^622260

634114 'G22272 .622271 [622270 ' 622269' J- —————— ————ssoier~~ ~

m 34115 l 622273 [622274

6l34ll6l622279 | 622278 ' 622277

Publ4c RaservtS.R.OFJI* 163003W. * 4 O O eh.

CO C0 O)

- - 3M.CL^

CL^ LU

' l M- * 4.50 eh

5 M. 4M.

TWP. M. 69541PMSW8052 2.5106 KEMP 200

THE TOWNSHIP OF

BURROWSDISTRICT OFSUDBURY

LARDER LAKEMINING DIVISION

SCALE: 1-INCH 40 CHAINS

LEGEND

PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SAIF .LEASESLOCATED LAND ,VLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYSRAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINESCANCELLED

C,S.

Loc.L.O.

M.R.O. S.R.O.

c.

NOTES

40Q 1 surface rights reservation around all i lakes and rivers..

flooding rights to elev. 113* on Sinclair^ Lake to H.E.P.C. L.O. 7191. File 1162 vol.4.

Flooding rights between elev. 1070'and the high water mark on Burrows Creek to H.E.PC. L.O. 7199. File 36881.

SAND and GRAVELMNR GRAVEL RESERVE 3C2I

Areas withdrawn from staking under Section43 of the Mining Act, R.&O. 1970.

Order No. File Date DispositionW. 66/76 "~~•IBBUIT ""———

DATE OF ISSBF76

APR 25 1983

Ministry of Natural Resources

S.R.O.

PLAN NO . 6 9 l

ONTARIO

MINlSTRY.pF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS ANCUMAPPJNG BRANCH

O) CD

CL

en^Oa:o:GO

SOTHMAN TWP M. II2I

5 M. M,

•M2928 ' 312929 312932

oh- 00

O•z. o

47 0 4B 22

12 17 Appro*.

VIN TWP M.96441P14SW0052 2.5186 KEMP

NOTES

400' surface rights reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers.

Areas withdrawn from staking under Section 43 of the Mining Act, R sn 1970 O'c.'ei NO. File Date Disposition

W.66/76 IB85I7 I9/M/76 S R O.

RESERVESPUBLIC RESERVt , JULY 15/63 , FILE 163003

RESERVE , JUNE 6/63, FILE 163003

WAST E DISPOSAL SITE BUFFER ZONE 2/9/81

WNfi GRAVEL RESERVE 3C27

DATE OF ISSUE

APR 2 T B83

Ministry of Natural Raso'JTORONTO

LEGEND

PATENTED LAND

PATENTED FOR SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

LEASE

LICENSE OF OCCUPATION

CROWN LAND SALES

LOCATED LAND

CANCELLED

MINING RIGHTS ONLY

SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

HIGHWAY CROUTE NO.

ROADS

TRAILS

RAILWAYS

POWER LINES

MARSH OR MUSKEG

MINES ^

'used only with summer resort locations or when space is limited

TOWNSHIP OF

KEMPDISTRICT OF

SUDBURY

LARDER LAKEMINING DIVISION

SCALE : 1 INCH 40 CHAINS (1/2 MILE)DR.

K INAMOTO

DATE JUNE 7IPLAN NO. M. 9 66

ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSI IPVr-fS AND MAPr'lN'G Srt^Mv,^

LEGENDLITHOLOGIC UNITS

PHANEROZOICCENOZOIC"

PLEISTOCENE AND RECENTCM ,;y, ^.iiid, tjr^vel , till ,;:id stream deposit.-;

PRECAMBRIAN bEARLY PRECAMBRIAN (ARCHEAN)

f'AFIC INTRUSIVE RD(XS

IT..SIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS

a; Api it pfie fy. ;.-i 1 nHd Syeni t e fd cKparf-.e Gran i te '^.urtz ftPf CranodJ 01 i te

ori te

^ .ir i "i^ i;yry

FELSIC METAVOLCANIC ROCKS (CALC-ALKALI NE)Aa Massive unstratified tuff•3b Crystal tuff•l c l .api 11 i t -.iff•3d Vol c.'ini c: l ; ' .- c i a

INTERMEDIATE KLTAVOLCANIC ROCKS (THOIF.IITIC AND CALC-ALKALIN'E3a Massive u:.: ; t j a ti f lad t LI! f3b Lapilli 1 uff3c Vol c: f in i c l.; i. .:c i a^d Cornet 1.1--.;! i Jig tuffs and lapilli tnl fs

'•'AFIC METAVOLCANIC ROCKS (THOLEIITIC AND MINOR CALC-ALKALINE)2 a Mi-issi ve to we 11 fei i a t cd flows1'b Pi Hewed fi ows2c Amp-rule* l i i" " .'•"•d .md ijnoisi2 d Tuff2e I,.ipilli tuff2 f Vol r a r, i r i .1 (.'Cci a2 g r ;arnot ix" 1 ^ i i ng flows2h Pi utj '.ui.-i r '.z oy os

K0l 'ATIITIC METAVOLCANIC ROCKSl la "'aE5-jive poly.1-, i.i ...r* d . ' ---\ .

1 b S i"-i ri i f ex l * j xt ,u ^ d fi cwsle Mn?si\'e V-cj r-alt i c koinai i ite3d Pi l lowed } .: ..-,j j l i c kor;,, t i i ' cle I,,.p.il li (uffIf Tuff

g Kx 11-'i i r-: J vt; CM i ! t -r,,it e , i -.1 or i t

m: IC INIRUSIVE ROCKS7a dr.bro 7b Di or i te7c :,':.--! urn tholeiite ]'0r)-],yry

[tlAl jDLC;\MIC AMD MlT/'fiEDIflHrARY ROCKS dCHEMICAL MbTASEDIMENTARY ROCKS

f-a Kxhalati ve or i nhalative i ronst.one (suhscr i pt s O, S and C denote whether the oxide, sulfide or carbonate i ron.stone respectively is dominate

Gb Graphite with pyrite

CLASTIC METASEDIMENTARY ROCKSl 5a Argillitej ..'b ("rirbonacecus argi l l ite

St- Aioriite to pttble f.-c.nglomerat e with pyrite balls

qc. . . . .tour. . .tourmaline al . . . . .albite ep. . . . .epidotefu. . . . .fuchsite ank. . . ..jj.Jitj-it e sid. . . .sideritedol . . . ,(!o]o,-iii t- Q

Pb.... .lead ''•'J . . . . . ii i eke l

neMo. . . . .lirnao. . . . r,. j: . r.t te py. . . . .pyj-i t. e 1X5. . . . .rrhc.t ite

eh . . . . .chlurite •'i ''b. . . -

G ro-ip So mp te s

MT - Magnesium tholeiite

F T - l ron tho le i ite

CA ~ Calc-o Ikaline

i-,' C'.',1 . C"- r'i--." ft? r\ f^pwn.

' ' ' ' . ', . '. '., 't-- r.'lf,pi6ir~.

M (l H c; [j Q m . l ndi (j n

R e ',cr ,i? \-,

4S ^ rr 1

6222^4

l O AU 6 1982

NEWMONT EXPLORATIONDU PONT OF CANADA

JOINT VENTURE

GEOLOGY

Property SIROLA - KARVINEN; PROJECT 285

TNnArea BURROWS TOWNSHIP

Prov ONTARIO NTS 41 P/ 14 SOUTH GROUP

Drafted by: RPB Plotted by: RPB jChecKoJ by R P B

Scale: o-. -, -^ctnt j Date: AUGUST 1982

41Pt4SWe05a 2.5186 KEMP

n ifn f—i,—i r-i rn; r i f y rt 1 l! , , *

;--r^.;-( ^^-i^'igj 1 ^. ;.^,

•i^^^MBH

s^ r-i\— -(7A

f fto Ik " li- *g^ m*? *t*"- -i '

" Jtft-

: . "i

V

1

Si v c

Zo <52^< ^CEK ^30 5,H-t OZ (L z V U-LiJGu o

fe^O 0*^ a^i 0^ D"5"J Qz a

i

••••i^HBM

>•OO-lOuo

••••fl

*n00CN

H-

UW^ott aZUlZ5

. tt 4tt

i4-jOtt"(A

:*. *--

OJa.oO-

•H

a.ZIA

Z5oh-

(A

JOtt tt3CD

hiOJ

*i

^

VHa.3 OttO1-IA4UJ

*

\a.^Pz

Ott<^Zoo

a7

••H

eao.tts-~RieX6^

eaa. tt*^

X3"S*-" -*-1O

Q-

CD O.tt

i"S .*- 'TO

O

•fl

d

COo-c^

^(A3OD 4aj •i-jTO

C3

O

a^^

O Oou~)

O)

n:oCO

oNT

a

-3-

SM|*. l inch to

K*y map showing location of Burrows Township*

Figuro l

41P14SW0a5a 2.5106 KEMP 250

URROWS TOWNSHIP

Shining Tree 41 km

IMTM* ^O ^ , * Z. ^

r^feff CTT asa L..™. ^- p ^5. ^ JOn^i—n SB

Scale l ; 50,000

Burrows Township claim location map showing claim, hold by Nowmont I.plorotlon of Canada Ltd.

Flauro 3

NEWMONT EXPLORATION OF CANADA LTD™-i

NEWMONT- DU PONT JOINT VENTURE

SIROLA -KARVINEN PROPERTY: PROJECT 285

BURROWS -KEMP TOWNSHIPS, ON

NTS: 41 P/14

JANUARY 1982

JULY 1982

LOCATION MAPLEGEND

Claims covered in this report

Claims covered in a previous report

R. P B.