rpms ipcrf

8
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form Name of Employee: Neil N. Atanacio Name of Rater: Freddy T. Josef Position: Teacher I Position: Officer-in-Charge Review Period: April 2015 to March 2016 Date of Review: March, 2016 Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE *Prepared lesson plans. 40% * To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned Freddy T. Josef Rater Page 1 Weight per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Teaching-Learning Process April to March following parts: objective, subject matter, procedure, evaluation, and assignment. Utilized innovative teaching strategies. Established a system of monitoring student's discipline. Classroom routines and procedures are in placed. *Facilitated learning through lesson plans and innovative teaching strategies. *Initiated discipline of students. *Established classroom routines and procedures. 4-lacked 1 indicator 3-lacked 2 indicators 2-lacked 3 indicators 1-lacked 4 indicators

Upload: neil-atanacio

Post on 16-Dec-2015

138 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

RPMS

TRANSCRIPT

Sheet1

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee:Neil N. AtanacioName of Rater:Freddy T. JosefPosition:Teacher IPosition:Officer-in-ChargeReview Period:April 2015 to March 2016Date of Review:March, 2016Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Department of EducationTO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNINGTO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATIONMFO'sKRA'sOBJECTIVESTIMELINEWeight per KRAPERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)ACTUAL RESULTSRATINGSCORETeaching-Learning Process*Prepared lesson plans.April to March40%5-All daily lesson plans had the following parts: objective, subject matter, procedure, evaluation, and assignment. Utilized innovative teaching strategies. Established a system of monitoring student's discipline. Classroom routines and procedures are in placed.*Facilitated learning through lesson plans and innovative teaching strategies.

*Initiated discipline of students.*Established classroom routines and procedures.

4-lacked 1 indicator3-lacked 2 indicators2-lacked 3 indicators1-lacked 4 indicators* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assignedOVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Freddy T. JosefNeil N. AtanacioRaterRatee

Page 1DEP-ED RPMS Form-Teachers

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee:Neil N. AtanacioName of Rater:Freddy T. JosefPosition:Teacher IPosition:Officer-in-ChargeReview Period:April 2015 to March 2016Date of Review:March, 2016Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Department of EducationTO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNINGTO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATIONMFO'sKRA'sOBJECTIVESTIMELINEWeight per KRAPERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)ACTUAL RESULTSRATINGSCOREPupil Outcomes*Monitored, evaluated, and maintained pupil's progress.April to March40%5-Evidences showed that the teacher purposely plans assessments and varies assessment choices to match the different student needs, abilities, and learning styles. Class record reflected the bases of ratings in all classes/subjects areas handled. Student's portfolio contained all of their accomplishments.

*Maintained updated pupil's school records.

*Attained the required GSA for grade level and learning areas.

4-lacked 1 indicator3-lacked 2 indicators2-lacked 3 indicators1-lacked 4 indicators* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assignedOVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Freddy T. JosefNeil N. AtanacioRaterRatee

Page 2DEP-ED RPMS Form-Teachers

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee:Neil N. AtanacioName of Rater:Freddy T. JosefPosition:Teacher IPosition:Officer-in-ChargeReview Period:April 2015 to March 2016Date of Review:March, 2016Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Department of EducationTO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNINGTO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATIONMFO'sKRA'sOBJECTIVESTIMELINEWeight per KRAPERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)ACTUAL RESULTSRATINGSCORECommunity Involvement*Conducted regular PTA meetings/conferences.April to March10%5-130% accomplished4-115% to 129% accomplished*Conducted activities/projects in the community through Scouting.3-100% to 114% accomplished2-51% to 99% accomplished1-50% below accomplished*Established a functional organization linked with the Philippine National Red Cross.

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assignedOVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Freddy T. JosefNeil N. AtanacioRaterRatee

Page 3DEP-ED RPMS Form-Teachers

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee:Neil N. AtanacioName of Rater:Freddy T. JosefPosition:Teacher IPosition:Officer-in-ChargeReview Period:April 2015 to March 2016Date of Review:March, 2016Bureau/Center/Service/Division:Department of EducationTO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNINGTO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATIONMFO'sKRA'sOBJECTIVESTIMELINEWeight per KRAPERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)ACTUAL RESULTSRATINGSCOREProfessional Growth and Development*Formulated a functional action plan.April to March10%5-Implemented an action research with documentation, produced related teaching-learning modules, and received recognitions for exemplary performance.

*Produced related teaching-learning modules.

*Received special awards/citations/recognition for exemplary performance.

4-lacked 1 indicator3-lacked 2 indicators2-lacked 3 indicators1-no output were produced* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assignedOVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Freddy T. JosefNeil N. AtanacioRaterRatee

Page 4DEP-ED RPMS Form-Teachers