roundup power project. development participants (bank’s independent consultant)
TRANSCRIPT
Development ParticipantsRoundup Power Project
Bull Mountain Development Co.
FGS & Associates, LLCPower Project Mgmt.
Sargent & Lundy LLCPower & Permittting
Consultant / AE
Weir Intl Mining Consultants
Mining Consultant
Lorenzen Engineering
Permitting Consultant
Mission Engineering
Permitting Consultant
BKBH, PCPermitting Consultant
(Bank’s independent consultant)
Bull Mountains MineLocation
• Bull Mountains Mine is located in Musselshell and Yellowstone Counties, Montana
• Southeast of the town of Roundup
• Approximately 35 miles north of the city of Billings, Montana
Mine Status
• Mining began in August 2003
• Contracts in place
• First shipments in September 2003
• Test burns at major utilities
• Additional mineral rights purchased
Roundup Power Project:Basic Characteristics
• Mine mouth power generation facility• 2 x 350 MW (net) units• Pulverized coal, subcritical (2400
psi/1000F/1000F)• Pollution control:
– Dry scrubber for SOx control– Selective catalytic reduction for NOx control– Baghouse for particulates– Air-cooled condenser
FGS & Associates, LLC
Roundup Power Project:Basic Characteristics
• Water supply from well field (3 wells @ 400 gpm each)
• Water collected and recycled – zero discharge• 35-mile transmission line to Broadview substation• Coal transported by conveyor from mine wash
plant directly to the power plant.• Two 175-meter stacks
FGS & Associates, LLC
Performance Data andMaterials Requirements
• 386 MW gross, 350 MW net per unit (9.3% aux. power)• 9,840 Btu/kWh net plant heat rate (full load, including
allowance for operating degradation)• Coal consumption:
– 165 tons/hour/unit (full load)– 1.31M tons/year/unit (90% capacity factor)
• Air emissions (values for permitting, two units):– SOx: 0.12 lb/MBtu (2160 tons/year/unit)
– NOx: 0.07 lb/MBtu (1260 tons/year/unit)– Particulates: 0.015 lb/MBtu– CO2: 211 lb/MBtu
FGS & Associates, LLC
Air Pollution Emissionsin Permit Application
Pollutant Emissions Control TechnologiesNitrogen Oxides 0.07 lb / MBtu Selective catalytic reduction 90%
overall reduction Overfire airLow NOX burners
Sulfur Dioxide 0.12 lb / MBtu Low sulfur coal94% Overall Reduction Dry scrubber
Particulate Matter 0.015 lb / MBtu Pulse-jet baghouse99.8% overall reduction
FGS & Associates, LLC
Roundup Power Project Improving Emissions from Coal Fuel
Plants
4.37
1.04
0.40.25 0.12
1.08
0.440.19 0.14 0.07
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
US Average1970
US Average2000
"Clear Skies" Proposal
2010 2008
"Clear Skies" Proposal 2018
Roundup PowerProject
Po
un
ds
pe
r m
illio
n B
TU
SO2
NOx
Source: US EPA Environmental Scorecard 2000: Feb. 2002
“Clear Skies” Administration Proposal & US DOE 2002 Annual Energy Outlook
Other Permits
• Water Rights
• FAA
• Letter from COE – no permits required
• Others routine – maximum 30 day lead time
Key Milestones
• Began permitting: July 2001• Submitted air permit: January 14, 2002• Draft air permit issued: August 12, 2002• Record of decision: January 31,2003• Final awards major equipment packages: Oct 2004• Unit 1 boiler hydro test: Mar 2007• Commercial service for Unit 1: March 2008• Commercial service for Unit 2: July 2008
FGS & Associates, LLC
Overall Process - Current
1. Permitting
2. Lawsuits
3. Final Engineering
4. Construction
5. Operation
Permitting Status
• Permit filed 1/14/02
• Responded to questions from FLM’s (issue is regional haze)
• Completion letter from MDEQ received on 8/1/02
• Draft permit issued 8/12/02
• Record of Decision 1/31/03
Air Permit Appeal
• Filed 2/15/03
• Usual enviro groups
• Kitchen sink approach
• No new issues
• Hearing on June 4 – 6, 2003
• Board dismissed virtually all items in appeal
Permit Lawsuit
• Filed 11/26/03 in Musselshell County• Challenges Board of Environmental Review
appeal decision• Interventions in our behalf by WETA, and
AFL-CIO • Record is clear on all issues• Court ruled strongly in favor of the permit
on March 31, 2004
MACT Letter Appeal
• Filed in December 2003• BER appointed Hearing Examiner to hear appeal• Stated issue is mercury control• Another vehicle to try to stall the project• Hearing held on April 20 & 21, 2004• Hearing officer recommended denying all portions
of the appeal.• BER denied petition 7-0 on June 4, 2004
EIS Status
• Not required under Montana rules• Volunteered to do EIS• Approved EIS for mine includes plant property• Scoping Hearing: 4/4/02• EIS supplement submitted: 5/21/02• EIS draft to be issued 11/15/02• Hearing 12/5/02• Record of Decision 1/31/03
FGS & Associates, LLC
EIS Lawsuit
• Filed in Lewis & Clark County
• Motion to change venue to Musselshell County by MDEQ, BMDC1 and intervenors (WETA & AFL-CIO) approved
• Court date set for 11/29/04
DOI Lawsuit
• Filed October 29, 2003 by Nat. Parks Conservation Assoc., Greater Yellowstone Coalition, Wilderness Soc., & private individual
• Objects to DOI finding of no significant impact
• BMDC1 to enter as intervenor
Construction
• Engineering released in April
• 1st package to be released for bids in June
• Start late August
• 2nd package to be released for bids in August
• Start October
Economic Impact of Roundup Power Project
• Taxes on 2.7 million tons/year of coal used
• Property and school taxes on $800 million investment
• Transmission taxes on 5.5 m Mwh/year
• Payroll and income taxes on 150 employees at about $40,000/year + additional temporary maintenance activities
• Several million in direct local purchases and contracts
• Ripple or multiplier effect of payroll and local purchases (~ $50m/yr)