rough draft - optical switching seminar report

22
1 A Seminar Report on OPTICAL SWITCHING Prepared by JERY EAPEN B070255EC B.Tech (Electronics and Communication Engineering) Department of Electronics and communication Engineering NATIONAL INISTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CALICUT Kozhikode, Kerala- 673601, India Monsoon 2010

Upload: raja-boppana

Post on 28-Mar-2015

459 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

1

A Seminar Report on

OPTICAL SWITCHING

Prepared by

JERY EAPEN

B070255EC

B.Tech (Electronics and Communication Engineering)

Department of Electronics and communication Engineering

NATIONAL INISTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CALICUT

Kozhikode, Kerala- 673601, India

Monsoon 2010

Page 2: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

2

Department of Electronics and communication Engineering

NATIONAL INISTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CALICUT

CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that this seminar report entitled “Optical

Switching” is a bonafide record of the seminar presented By Mr Jery Eapen,

Roll No.B070255EC, During Monsoon 2010 in partial Fulfillment of the

requirement of award of B.Tech degree in Electronics and Communication

Engineering by the National Institute of Technology Calicut,

India.

Dr Lillykutty Jacob

Faculty In-Charge of Seminar

Department of Electronics and

Communication Engineering

N.I.T Calicut

Date:

Page 3: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................... 5

1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 6

2. OPTICAL SWITCHES .......................................................................................................... 7

3. PARAMETERS OF AN OPTICAL SWITCH ...................................................................... 8

3.1 Insertion loss: ................................................................................................................... 8

3.2 Crosstalk: ......................................................................................................................... 8

3.3 Extinction ratio: ............................................................................................................... 8

3.4 Polarization-dependent loss (PDL): ................................................................................. 8

3.5 Other parameters: ............................................................................................................. 8

4. DIFFERENT TYPES OF OPTICAL SWITCHES ................................................................ 9

4.1 OPTOMECHANICAL SWITCH .................................................................................... 9

4.2 MEMS .............................................................................................................................. 9

4.2.1 Working .................................................................................................................. 10

4.2.2 Advantages .............................................................................................................. 10

4.3 THERMO-OPTIC SWITCH ......................................................................................... 12

4.3.1 Working .................................................................................................................. 12

4.3.2 Advantages .............................................................................................................. 12

4.4 BUBBLE SWITCH ....................................................................................................... 13

4.5 LIQUID CRYSTAL SWITCH ...................................................................................... 14

4.5.1 Working .................................................................................................................. 15

4.6 ELECTRO-OPTIC SWITCH ........................................................................................ 16

4.7 ACOUSTO-OPTIC SWITCH ....................................................................................... 16

4.8 NON-LINEAR OPTICAL SWITCH ............................................................................. 17

5. Comparison of Optical Switching Technologies ................................................................. 20

6. CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 21

7. BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................ 22

Page 4: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

4

TABLE OF FIGURES

Figure 2.1 An All Optical Switch ............................................................................................ 7

Figure 4.1 Principle of MEMS optical switch operation ....................................................... 11

Figure 4.2 The general principle of thermo-optical switching elements ............................... 13

Figure 4.3 The general principle of the bubble optical switch ............................................... 14

Figure 4.4 The general structure of the liquid crystal switching element .............................. 15

Figure 4.5 An electro-optic directional coupler switch .......................................................... 16

Figure 4.6 Schematic of a polarization independent acousto-optic switch. ........................... 17

Figure 4.7 Nonlinear optical switching .................................................................................. 19

Page 5: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

5

ABSTRACT

Explosive information demand in the internet world is creating enormous needs for capacity

expansion in next generation telecommunication networks. Optical networks are widely

regarded as the ultimate solution to the bandwidth needs of future communication systems.

Optical fibre links deployed between nodes are capable to carry terabits of information but

the electronic switching at the nodes limit the bandwidth of a network. Optical switches at the

nodes will overcome this limitation. With their improved efficiency and lower costs, Optical

switches provide the key to both manage the new capacity Dense Wavelength Division

Multiplexing (DWDM) links as well as gain a competitive advantage for provision of new

band width hungry services. Optical switches will switch a wavelength or an entire fibre form

one pathway to another, leaving the data-carrying packets in a signal untouched. There are

several methods by which optical switching can be implemented (like MEMS, Bubble switch

etc.). A brief look into the different methods of implementing an optical switch and its

advantages over electronic switches is taken into account.

Page 6: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

6

1. INTRODUCTION

In telecommunication, an optical switch is a switch that enables signals in optical fibers or

integrated optical circuits (IOCs) to be selectively switched from one circuit to another.

The word is used on several levels. In commercial terms (such as "the telecom optical switch

market size") it refers to any piece of circuit switching equipment between fibers. The

majority of installed systems in this category actually use electronic switching between fiber

transponders. Systems that perform this function by physically switching light are often

referred to as "photonic" switches, independent of how the light itself is switched. Away from

the world of telecom systems, an optical switch is the unit that actually switches light

between fibers, and a photonic switch is one that does this by exploiting nonlinear material

properties to steer light (i.e., to switch wavelengths or signals within a given fiber).

Theoretically optical switches seem to be future proof with features of scalability, flexibility,

bit rate and protocol independent coupled with lower infrastructure costs but a network

service provider must evaluate the pros and cons and all possible options to select optimum

combination of electronic and photonic switches to meet the capacity and traffic management

requirements. This seminar presents an overview on optical switches.

Page 7: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

7

2. OPTICAL SWITCHES

Optical switches will switch a wavelength or an entire fiber-form one

pathway to another, leaving the data-carrying packets in the signal untouched. An electronic

signal from electronic processor will set the switch in the right position so that it directs an

incoming fiber – or wavelengths within that fiber- to a given output fiber. But none of the

wavelengths will be converted to electrons for processing.

Optical switching may eventually make obsolete existing lightwave

technologies based on the ubiquitous SONET (Synchronous Optical Network)

communications standard, which relies on electronics for conversion and processing of

individual packets. In tandem with the gradual withering away of Asynchronous Transfer

Mode (ATM), another phone company standard for packaging information.

Figure 2.1 - 1 An All Optical Switch

Page 8: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

8

3. PARAMETERS OF AN OPTICAL SWITCH

The most important parameter of a switch is the switching time. Different applications have

different switching time requirements. Other important parameters of a switch follow.

3.1 Insertion loss:

The fraction of signal power that is lost because of the switch. The insertion loss of a switch

should be about the same for all input-output connections (loss uniformity).

3.2 Crosstalk:

The ratio of the power at a specific output from the desired input to the power from all other

inputs.

3.3 Extinction ratio:

The ratio of the output power in the on-state to the output power in the off-state. This ratio

should be as large as possible.

3.4 Polarization-dependent loss (PDL):

If the loss of the switch is not equal for both states of polarization of the optical signal, the

switch is said to have polarization-dependent loss. It is desirable that optical switches have

low PDL.

3.5 Other parameters:

Reliability

Energy usage

Scalability (ability to build switches with large port counts that perform adequately)

Temperature resistance.

Page 9: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

9

4. DIFFERENT TYPES OF OPTICAL SWITCHES

The main optical switching technologies available today are as follows.

4.1 OPTOMECHANICAL SWITCH

Optomechanical technology was the first commercially available for

optical switching. In optomechanical switches, the switching function is performed by some

mechanical means. These mechanical mean include prisms, mirrors, and directional couplers.

Mechanical switches exhibit low insertion losses, low polarization-dependent loss, low

crosstalk, and low fabrication cost. Their switching speeds are in the order of a few

milliseconds, which may not be acceptable for some types of applications. Another

disadvantage is the lack of scalability. As with most mechanical components, long-term

reliability is also of some concern. Optomechanical switch configurations are limited to 1*2

and 2*2 port sizes.

4.2 MEMS

Micro-electro Mechanical Systems or MEMS is a new process for device

fabrication, which builds “micromechines” that are finding increasing acceptance in many

industries ranging from telecommunications to automotive, aerospace, consumer electronics

and others.

In essence, MEMS are Mechanical Integrated circuits, using photo

lithographic and etching processes similar to those employed in making large scale integrated

circuits – devices that are deposited and patterned on a silicon-wafer’s surface.

Page 10: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

10

4.2.1 Working

Software in the switch’s processor makes a decision about where an

incoming stream of photons should go. It sends a signal to an electrode on the chip’s surface

that generates an electric field that tilts the mirrors. The wavelengths bounce off the input

mirrors and get reflected off another mirror onto output mirrors that direct the wavelength

into another fiber. Switches with 256 incoming fibers and same number of outgoing fibers

have been successfully tested and employed.

4.2.2 Advantages

1. Fast

No opto-electronic conversion, so the entire process lasts a few

milliseconds, fast enough for the most demanding switching applications. The above

switch offered more than 10 terabits per second of total switching capacity, with

each of the channels supporting 320 GB per second – 128 times faster than current

electronic switches. Eventually such switches might support the petabit (quadrillion-

bit) systems that are looming on the horizon.

2. Size

Each mirror in one MEMS switch is half a millimeter in diameter, about

the size of the head of a pin. Mirrors rest one millimeter apart and all 256- mirrors

are fabricated on a 2.5 centimeter-square piece of silicon. The entire switch is about

the size of a grape- fruit –32 times denser than an electronic switch.

3. Power reduction

With no processing, or opto-electronic conversion, these switches

provide a 300-fold reduction in power consumption over electronic switches.

4. Economical

Standard silicon circuit manufacturing processors make the technology cost effective.

5. Larger Switches

The design of mirror-arrays uses one mirror for input and one for output. Coupled

with the VLSI technique, they promote building of much larger switches.

6. Stability

Silicon microns afford greater stability than if the mirrors were fabricated from metal.

Page 11: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

11

7. Accurate

Use of silicon fabrication technology results in stiffer mirrors that are less prone to

drifting out of alignment and which are robust, long lived and scalable to large

number of devices on wafer. Superior-Software control algorithms let the individual

elements manipulated precisely.

8. Well-matched to optics application

The technology is also well matched to optics applications – because easily

accommodates the need to expand or reconfigure the number of pathway through the

switch.

Figure 4.1- (1) Principle of MEMS optical switch operation

Page 12: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

12

4.3 THERMO-OPTIC SWITCH

The MEMS is not the only way to produce an optical switch architecture

that uses many small and inexpensive components to control the flow of light from input to

output. One interesting approach is to use what are known as Thermo-optical waveguides.

Waveguides can be built by the some standard process used to make integrated circuits and

so like “fibers on a chip”. Waveguides have a core and cladding made of glass with differing

indices of refraction, just like normal fiber optic cables.

The basic Thermo-optical switching element has an input waveguide and

two possible output waveguides. In between there are two short, internal waveguides that first

split the input light and then couple the two internal waveguides together again. The

recombined light would proceed down the “default” output waveguide. But thermo-optical

effect makes it possible to use this coupling of the light as a switching element.

4.3.1 Working

The general principle of thermo-optical switching element is shown in

the figure. An input light wave is split onto two separate waveguides. If no heat is applied to

the lower branch in the figure, the coupler will output the waveform on to the waveguide

labeled output#1 in the figure. The figure shows the heating element activated, and a slightly

different phase induced into the waveform on the lower branch. So the output light wave does

not take the default waveguide but ends upon the waveguide labeled output#2 instead.

4.3.2 Advantages

Because they can be built on a common material substrate like silicon,

waveguides tend to be small and inexpensive, and they can be manufactured in large batches.

The substrates, called wafers, can serve as platforms to attach lasers and detectors that would

enable transmission or receipt of optical pulses that represent individual bits. Integration of

various components could lead to photonic integrated circuit, a miniaturized version of the

components that populate physics laboratories, one reason the waveguide technology is

sometimes called a SILICON OPTICAL BENCH

Page 13: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

13

Figure 4.2-1 The general principle of thermo-optical switching elements

4.4 BUBBLE SWITCH

The switch consist of a silica waveguide with arrays of intersecting light

pipes that from a mesh. A small hole sits at a point where these light pipes intersect. It

contains an index-matching fluid (one whose index of refraction is the same as the silica). So

if no bubble is present at the junction, the light proceeds down the default waveguide path. If

a bubble of fluid is present at the junction, the light is shifted onto the second output

waveguide. The bubble acts as a mirror that reflects the light wave to another branch of the

switching element. An ink-jet printing head underneath can blow a bubble into the hole,

causing light to bend and move into another waveguide. But if no bubble is present, the light

proceeds straight. That this switch works at all is a testament to the extraordinary

sophistication of the fluid technology behind printers.

Page 14: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

14

Figure 4.3 0-1 The general principle of the bubble optical switch

4.5 LIQUID CRYSTAL SWITCH

Even more people are familiar with the liquid crystal displays found in

digital watches and some forms of computer output devices than are familiar with inkjet

printers. Liquid crystals can also be used as a basis for optical switches as well. When an

electrical field is applied to the liquid crystal, the molecules line up and so can become

opaque.

The liquid crystal switches rely on a change in the polarization of optical

signals with the application of electrical voltage to make a switching element. Because the

liquid crystal molecules are so long and thin, they will let only light of a particular orientation

pass through the liquid crystal.

Liquid crystal switching elements are built with two active components,

the cell and the displacer. The liquid crystal cell is formed by placing the liquid crystals

between two plates of glass. The glass is coated with an oxide material that conducts

electricity and is also transparent. The glass plate forms the electrodes of the cell portion of

the switching element. The main function of the cell is to reorient the polarized light entering

the cell as required. The displacer is a composite crystal that directs the polarized light

leaving the cell. Light polarized in one direction is directed to one output waveguide by the

displacer, while light polarized at a 90 degree angle is directed to a second output waveguide.

Page 15: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

15

4.5.1 Working

The upper portion of the figure shows the path of a light wave when no

voltage is applied to the cell. Input light of arbitrary polarization lines up with the default

polarization orientation of the liquid crystals inside the cell. The displacer also has a default

orientation and the light emerges as shown in the figure. The lower portion of the figure

shows the path of a light wave when voltage is applied to the cell. Note that the liquid

crystals in the cell and those in the displacer both change their orientation under the influence

of the voltage. The polarized light now takes the second output path.

Figure 4.4 0-1 The general structure of the liquid crystal switching element

Page 16: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

16

4.6 ELECTRO-OPTIC SWITCH

Electro-optical switches use highly birefringent substrate material and electrical fields to

redirect light from one port to another. A popular material to use is Lithium Niobate

(LiNbO3). Fast switches (typically in less than a nanosecond). This switching time limit is

determined by the capacitance of the electrode configuration. Electro-optic switches are

reliable, but have high insertion loss and possible polarization dependence. Polarization

independence is possible but at the cost of a higher driving voltage, which in turn limits the

switching speed.

Figure 4.5 0-1 An electro-optic directional coupler switch

An electrical voltage applied to the electrodes changes the substrate’s index of refraction. The

change in the index of refraction manipulates the light through the appropriate waveguide

path to the desired port.

4.7 ACOUSTO-OPTIC SWITCH

The operation of acousto-optic switches is based on the acousto-optic effect, i.e., the

interaction between sound and light. The principle of operation of a polarization-insensitive

acousto-optic switch is as follows. First, the input signal is split into its two polarized

components (TE and TM) by a polarization beam splitter. Then, these two components are

directed to two distinct parallel waveguides. A surface acoustic wave is subsequently created.

This wave travels in the same direction as the light waves. Through an acousto-optic effect in

the material, this forms the equivalent of a moving grating, which can be phase-matched to an

optical wave at a selected wavelength. A signal that is phase-matched is “flipped” from the

Page 17: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

17

TM to the TE mode (and vice versa), so that the polarization beam splitter that resides at the

output directs it to the lower output. A signal that was not phase-matched exits on the upper

output.

Figure 4.6 0-1 Schematic of a polarization independent acousto-optic switch.

If the incoming signal is multiwavelength, it is even possible to switch several different

wavelengths simultaneously, as it is possible to have several acoustic waves in the material

with different frequencies at the same time. The switching speed of acoustooptic switches is

limited by the speed of sound and is in the order of microseconds.

4.8 NON-LINEAR OPTICAL SWITCH

Another type of optical switch takes advantage of the way of the

refractive index of glass changes as the intensity of light varies. Most of the optical

phenomena in everyday life are linear. If more light is shined on a mirror, the surface reflects

more of the incident light and the imaged room appears brighter.

A non-linear optical effect, however, changes the material properties

through which the light travels. Mirror becomes transparent when more light is shined on it.

Glass optical fibers experience non-linear effects, some of which can be

used to design very fast switching elements, capable of changing their state in a femto-second

Page 18: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

18

(quadrillionth of a second time scale). Consider a non-linear optical loop mirror, a type of

interferometer in which two light beams interact.

In the mirror a fiber splitter divides an incoming beam. In one instance

each segment travels through the loop in opposite directions recombines after completing the

circle and exist on the same fiber on which it entered the loop. In cases, though, after the two

beams split, an additional beam is send down one side of the loop but not the other. The

intensity of light produced by the interaction of the coincident beams changes the index of

refraction in the fiber, which in turn changes the phase of the light. The recombined signal

with its altered phase, exits out a separate output fiber.

In general, non-linear optical switching requires the use of very short

optical pulses that contain sufficient power to elicit non-linear effects from the glass in the

fiber. An optical amplifier incorporated into the switch, however, can reduce the threshold at

which these non-linear effects occur. For the purpose of switching the intensity dependent

phase change induced by the silica fiber itself could be used as the non-linearity. The pulse

traversing the fiber loop clockwise is amplified by an EDFA shortly after it leaves the

directional coupler.

This configuration is called Non-linear Amplifying Loop Mirror

(NALM). The amplified pulse has higher intensity and undergoes a larger phase shift on

traversing the loop compared to the unamplified pulse. Although non-linear switches have yet

to reach commercial development, the technology shows promise for the future.

Page 19: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

19

Figure 4.6 0-1 Nonlinear optical switching

Page 20: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

20

5. COMPARISON OF OPTICAL SWITCHING TECHNOLOGIES

Platform Scheme Strengths Weaknesses

Opto-

mechanical

Employ

electromechanical

actuators to redirect a

light beam

Optical performance,

“old” technology

Speed, bulky,

scalability

MEMS Use tiny reflective

surfaces

Size, scalability Packaging, reliability

Thermo-

optical

Temper. control to change

index of refraction

Integration wafer-

level

manufacturability

Optical performance,

power consumption,

speed, scalability

Liquid

Crystal

Processing of polarisation

states of light

Reliability, optical

performance

Scalability,

temperature

dependency

Gel/oil

based

A subset of thermo-

optical technology

Modular scalability Unclear reliability,

high insertion loss

Magneto-

optics

Faraday Speed Optical performance

Acousto-

optic

Acousto-optic effect, RF

signal tuning

Size, speed Optical performance

Electro-

optic

Dielectric Speed High insertion loss,

polarisation,

scalability, expensive

Page 21: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

21

6. CONCLUSION

Photonic packet – switched networks offer the potential of realizing

packet-switched networks with much higher capacities than may be possible with electronic

packet-switched networks. However, significant advances in technology are needed to make

them practical, and there are some significant roadblocks to overcome, such as the lock of

economical optical buffering and the difficulty of propagating very high speed signals at tens

and hundreds of gigabits/second over any significant distances of optical fiber. There is a

need for compact light sources. At this time, fast optical switches have relatively high losses,

including polarization-dependent losses, and are not amenable to integration, which is

essential to realize large switches. Temperature dependence of individual components can

also be a significant problem when multiplexing, demultiplexing, or synchronizing signals at

such high bit rates.

Page 22: rough draft - optical switching seminar  report

22

7. BIBLIOGRAPHY

Xiaohua Ma; Geng-Sheng Kuo; “Optical switching technology comparison: optical

MEMS vs. other technologies " IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 41,no. 2,pp.

S16 – S23,2003.

Georgios I. Papadimitriou , Chrisoula Papazoglou, and Andreas S. Pomportsis ;“Journal Of

Lightwave Technology”, Vol. 21, No. 2, February 2003 Bourouha M.A,Bataineh M, Guizani M; SoutheastCon, 2002.Proceedings IEEE, pp.

405-413.

Rajiv Kumar, “Optical Switching”, Telecommunications, Nov-Dec 2002.

Walter Goralski, Optical Networking and WDM, Tata Mc Grawhill edition.

Rajiv Ramaswami, Kumar N Sivarajan – Optical networks. A practical perspective.

www.wikipedia.org