ropax ferry business case returns & environmental benefits · ropax ferry business case returns...

86
© Wärtsilä ROPAX FERRY BUSINESS CASE RETURNS & ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS 13.6.2016 [Presentation name / Author] 1 John Hatley PE Gas Initiatives ( MBA, MSE ) Wartsila North America Cell 281 221 4209 [email protected] Green Tech 2016 Green Marine Mapping Sustainable Future Shipping Quebec City May 30 June 1

Upload: ngoque

Post on 16-Apr-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

© Wärtsilä

ROPAX FERRY BUSINESSCASE RETURNS & ENVIRONMENTALBENEFITS

13.6.2016 [Presentation name / Author]1

John Hatley PEGas Initiatives ( MBA, MSE )

Wartsila North AmericaCell 281 221 4209

[email protected]

Green Tech 2016Green MarineMapping Sustainable Future ShippingQuebec CityMay 30 – June 1

© Wärtsilä

Harvey Gulf International

13.6.2016 [Presentation name / Author]2

Harvey Energy… on Charter March 2015

Harvey Power… on Charter October 2015

Harvey Liberty… on Charter May 2016

3 vessels, 23+ months operations… >15,000 hours…

charters running on gas fuel, no downtime.

© Wärtsilä

24+ LNG Fuel Vessels contracted Wartsila for North America

13.6.2016 [Presentation name / Author]3

3 @ BC Ferries +2

2 @ Seaspan

2 @ TOTE

3 @ Society Quebec Ferries

6 @ Harvey Gulf

+ @ Owner 2 + X Merchant

Vessels

© Wärtsilä

Society for Gas as a Marine Fuel SGMF

13.6.2016 [Presentation name / Author]4

Membership value…join the 100+ companies promoting safety and best practices

Source: http://www.sgmf.info/about/welcome

© Wärtsilä

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Keys

Global Energy Policies, market gamesmanship ?

Future Ahead, structural shifts?

As a vessel owner, all I want to knowis the tipping point…

What fuel strategy do I choose to to boost my bottom line & improve sustainability?

5 © Wärtsilä

A “Commodity Play” on fuel energy costs

seeking competitive advantage for market

share.

© Wärtsilä

Agenda

6 © Wärtsilä

What ? Fuel Price vs. Cost

Energy

Why & How ? No. Am ECA & Emissions

Owner Choices

Abatement: SCR, Scrubber, LNG

Business Case Cargo, Investor, Banker Views

ROPAX Ferry

Investment Returns

Oil Price Shock ! Business Case: Robust or Fragile?

Stress Test

Conclusions Business Case Appendix

© Wärtsilä

Agenda

7 © Wärtsilä

What ? Fuel Price vs. Cost

Energy

Why & How ? No. Am ECA & Emissions

Owner Choices

Abatement: SCR, Scrubber, LNG

Business Case Cargo, Investor, Banker Views

ROPAX Ferry

Investment Returns

Oil Price Shock ! Business Case: Robust or Fragile?

Stress Test

Conclusions Business Case Appendix

© Wärtsilä

Quiz…. Fuel Price ?

a) HFO 412.87 $ CAD / ton ….

b) MDO 466.30 $ CAD / ton .…

c) LNG 514.85 $ CAD / ton ….

8 © Wärtsilä

Which is the lowest price ?

© Wärtsilä

The Price Paid for what it Cost

9 © Wärtsilä

: the amount of money that you pay for something

: the price of something : the amount of money that is needed to pay

for or buy something

© Wärtsilä

Quiz… Fuel Answer Key

a) HFO 412.47 $ CAD / ton ….

b) MDO 446.30 $ CAD / ton .…

c) LNG 514.85 $ CAD / ton ….

10 © Wärtsilä

Which is the lowest price ?

Key concept… purchase energy, not tons or gallons, which is the lowest

cost per unit of energy?

Reference Common Values that will vary…

HFO 37,430 BTU/kg MDO 40,500 BTU/kg LNG 46,720 BTU/kg

density 980 kg/ m3 850 kg/ m3 430 kg/ m3

11.02 $ CAD / mm BTU

11.02 $ CAD / mm BTU

11.02 $ CAD / mm BTU

© Wärtsilä

LNG Cost 08 February 2016

Fixed Liquefaction Charge 4.60 CAD $/ GJ

Variable Sumas Gas Basis + 3.00 CAD $/ GJ

Total FOB LNG Price 7.60 CAD $/ GJ

conversion to million BTU x 1.05435

LNG FOB price 8.02 CAD $/ mm BTU

11 © Wärtsilä

Allow 3.00 $/mmBTU transport = 11.02 CAD $ / mm BTU or LNG 515 CAD $ / ton

© Wärtsilä

Agenda

12 © Wärtsilä

What ? Fuel Price vs. Cost

Energy

Why & How ? No. Am ECA & Emissions

Owner Choices

Abatement: SCR, Scrubber, LNG

Business Case Cargo, Investor, Banker Views

ROPAX Ferry

Investment Returns

Oil Price Shock ! Business Case: Robust or Fragile?

Stress Test

Conclusions Business Case Appendix

© Wärtsilä

Emission Control Areas

13 © Wärtsilä

Sulphur ECA’s, more

coming soon.

© Wärtsilä

IMO MARPOL Annex VI NOX

13.6.2016 [Presentation name / Author]14

2016 Tier III

© Wärtsilä

No. Am. ECA Fuel Sulfur Limit

15 Wärtsilä

Source:http://www.dnvusa.com/industry/maritime/publicationsanddownloads/publi

cations/newsletters/technical_regulatory/2012/north_american_emission_control_

area.asp

Fuel Sulfur 0.10 % limit commences 1 January 2015

© Wärtsilä

2015 ECA 0.1% Sulfur Fuel

16 © Wärtsilä

Works with high Sulfur HFO

Low total lifecycle cost

Use everywhere

Scrubber targets Sox……….. Selective Catalytic Reducer targets N0x………..

LNG targets CO2, NOx, PM, & SOx.

Source: 2015 Exhaust Gas Cleaning Scrubbers Dec 2015 011415.pptx

© Wärtsilä

Emissions, Environment, & Health

13.6.2016 [Presentation name / Author]17

CO2Carbon Dioxide

Greenhouse

Gas

NOxNitrogen Oxide

Ozone

SOxSulphur Oxide

Respiratory

PMParticulate

Matter

Carcinogen

© Wärtsilä

Watershed 12 December 2015

13.6.2016[Presentation name / Author]18

Paris COP21 nearly 200

nations adopt global pact to

fight climate change,

promise cuts to greenhouse

gas pollution with sanctions

for countries failing to

comply.

Source: http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/cop21-climate-change-talks-

saturday-announced-1.3362354

© Wärtsilä

22 April 2016 UN Secretary Signs Paris COP21

13.6.2016 [Presentation name / Author]19

Source: http://ec.europa.eu/clima/news/articles/news_2016042101_en.htm

UN Secretary signs world’s first

universal climate change

agreement by 195 countries of

Paris accord December 12, 2015.

Ratification now underway,

requires 55 countries signatures

constituting 55% of global

emissions for entry into force.

Source:

http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/international/negotiations/paris/index_en.htm

© Wärtsilä 13.6.2016 [Presentation name / Author]20

22 April 2016 IMO MEPC London

IMO response to Paris

COP21 Accord. CO2

reduction data

collection system and

reporting to flag states

for all vessels above

5,000 GT. First step

toward additional CO2

reduction measures.

Source:

http://www.marinelog.com/index.php?option=com

_k2&view=item&id=10892:imos-mepc-makes-

progress-on-co2-measures&Itemid=227

© Wärtsilä

Emission Control Areas

21 © Wärtsilä

DF Natural Gas Engine Diesel Engine0

20

40

60

80

100

Emission

values [%]

CO2

NOx

SOx

Particulates

-25%

-85%

-99%

-99%

LNG provides

significant emission

reductions

compared to

traditional diesel

engines

© Wärtsilä

Why clean ?

13.6.2016 [Presentation name / Author]22

Methane

[CH4]

4:1

(400%)

Ethane

[C2H6]

6:2

(300%)

Propane

[C3H8]

8:3

(267%)

Butane

[C4H10]

10:4

(250%)

Natural gas… lowest carbon ratio = cleanest burning fuel

© Wärtsilä

North America ECA SOx & NOx

23 © Wärtsilä

Canada Fuel Sulfur

2012… 1% Limit

2015… 0.1% Limit*

*Fleet Averaging Program

IMO Newbuilds

2016… NOx Tier III

© Wärtsilä

Canada Fleet Sulphur Averaging Program

13.6.2016 [Presentation name / Author]24

Transport Canada issues a

Canadian Air Pollution

Certificate for vessels

following the regime to

average sulphur content of

fuel across the firm’s fleet

until 31 December 2020.

Afterward all vessels are to

comply with 0.1% sulphur

content by fuel or

approved alternative

compliance option.

Source:https://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/marinesafety/bulletins-2013-

03-eng.htm

© Wärtsilä

Decision Tree… New Build IMO Vessel

25 © Wärtsilä

New

Build

Diesel

HFO

LNG

Scrubber … Fuel Sulfur

Compliance

LNG Compliance

North America ECA January 2016 multiple emission requirements; both fuel sulfur

limits (2015) and engine emissions requirements ( 2016 IMO Tier 3 ) in effect

New IMO Tier 3 engine

+ after-treatment… SCR, EGR 0.1% Sulfur… Fuel

Compliance

New IMO Tier 3 engine

+ after-treatment… SCR, EGR

+ Scrubber

New IMO Tier 3 engine

+ LNG cryogenics

© Wärtsilä

New Build Attributes

26 © Wärtsilä

Source: Wartsila Moss White Paper: Exhaust Gas Cleaning: How to Choose the Correct Scrubber,

Jennifer Ahlback, 2014.

Excess baggage as systems require host support; chemicals, tanks, waste stream

sludge, piping/pumps, controls/automation, soot blowers…

Diesel + SCR

LNG

HFO + SCR + Scrubber

© Wärtsilä

Wartsila NOx Selective Catalytic Reducer “SCR” System

27 © Wärtsilä

Soot Blower

Air

Pump

Mixing Duct

Dosing Unit

NOR Reactor

Controls

Urea Tank

Compressed

Air

Urea Mixing & Injection

© Wärtsilä

LNGPac System

28 © Wärtsilä

Source: http://www.wartsila.com/media/news/26-08-2014-wartsila-launches-new-technical-solution-for-fuel-gas-

handling

C Type

Cryogenic Tank

Cold Box

Bunker

Station

© Wärtsilä 29 © Wärtsilä

De- Plume Unit

Bleed-Off

Treatment

Alkali Feed

Module

Holding Tank

Exhaust Gas Fan

Alkali Storage

Tank

Sludge

Tank

Water

Measurement

Exhaust Gas

Analyzer

Scrubbing Water

Pump

Heat

Exchanger

CW Pump

Water

Measurement

Process

Tank

Closed Loop Scrubber

© Wärtsilä

Venturi Inline

13.6.2016 [Presentation name / Author]30

Scrubber Types

© Wärtsilä

Scrubber References

13.6.2016 [Presentation name / Author]31

Merchant

Container vessels:

5 vessels, 8 scrubbers, 105 MW

Tankers:

2 vessels, 2 scrubbers, 5 MW

Ro-Ro:

21 vessels, 42 scrubbers, 411 MW

Bulker:

10 vessels, 10 scrubbers, 104 MW

LPG:

8 vessels, 15 scrubbers, 132 MW

Cruise and Ferry

Cruise:

23 vessels

45 scrubbers

1281 MW in total

Ro-Pax:

11 vessels

37 scrubbers

280 MW in total

Others

Trawler:

1 vessel 11 MW

81 installations… 160 scrubbers… > 2,300 Mw

© Wärtsilä

2015 ECA & 2016 N0x Owner Choices

Consume compliant Low Sulfur Distillate… champagne fuel + Selective Catalytic Reduction for N0x

Switch to LNG fuel: safe, clean, abundant, affordable, & available natural gas LNGReduction: CO2, N0x, SOx, PM

HFO Alternative Compliance… install scrubber for S0x + Selective Catalytic Reduction for N0x

Abort the Port

13 June 2016

ECA & IMO force timely owner choices

© Wärtsilä

Agenda

33 © Wärtsilä

What ? Fuel Price vs. Cost

Energy

Why & How ? No. Am ECA & Emissions

Owner Choices

Abatement: SCR, Scrubber, LNG

Business Case Cargo, Investor, Banker Views

ROPAX Ferry

Investment Returns

Oil Price Shock ! Business Case: Robust or Fragile?

Stress Test

Conclusions Business Case Appendix

© Wärtsilä

Cautionary Remarks

Each investment case requires careful analysis, inclusion, and weighing a broad variety of issues stemming from technical, financial, operational, regulatory, and other areas.

The purpose of this exercise is to illustrate a Business Case example and how a few of many key considerations may be transcribed into financial modeling as an aide to decision making.

Readers are advised that neither the Author nor Wartsila nor it’s subsidiaries are responsible for any errors, omissions, or updates to this information contained herein or assumptions or derivations whatsoever.

34 © Wärtsilä

This presentation is no substitute for your good and responsible decision

making. Please utilize prudence and caution when making investment decisions

along with securing the advice and guidance of professionals.

© Wärtsilä

4 Viewpoints

35 © Wärtsilä

Ultimate

Environment

Safety

At fair return

capturing risks

PUBLIC

FERRY OWNER

BANKER

Transport safely

at optimal cost

reliably

VEHICLE DRIVER

Are risks

understood &

I’m repaid !

© Wärtsilä

4 Key Metrics

36 © Wärtsilä

Ultimate

Environment

Safety

Return on

Investment:

ROIC, EBITDA,

cash flows

PUBLIC

FERRY OWNER

All in Charter

Freight Rate

$ / unit

transported

VEHICLE DRIVER

EBIT, Times

Burden Cover,

cash flows

BANKER

© Wärtsilä

Business Case Vessel

37 © Wärtsilä

Canadian Corporation

ROPAX Capacity 700 passengers & 240 vehicles

New Build

North America ECA IMO Tier 3

Cruise Speed 16 knots ( 3 engines online, 1 standby )

Design 18 knots ( 4 engines online w/margin )

Electric Drive Twin Screw

Installed power 18,800 kW ( 25,200 HP )

Major Class Society

© Wärtsilä

The Route

38 © Wärtsilä

100% “ECA” Bound route, 580 nm round trip, 6 hour turnaround each port,

high season 6 months @ 2 day/RT, transition 5 months @ 3 day/RT, slow season

1 month @ 4 day/ RT, 16 knot schedule ( 18 knot max speed )… 148 RT/year

© Wärtsilä

Recall ?

39 © Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä

Recall ?

40 © Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä

Wartsila W31

13.6.2016 [Presentation name / Author]41

© Wärtsilä

W31 Diesel Electric

13.6.2016 [Presentation name / Author]42

SCR

© Wärtsilä

W31 LNG Electric

13.6.2016 [Presentation name / Author]43

LNG

© Wärtsilä

W31 HFO Electric

13.6.2016 [Presentation name / Author]44

Scrubber

SCR

HFO

© Wärtsilä

Exchange Rates

Then August 2014

$1 US = $1.09 CAD

Source: http://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=USD&to=CAD&view=5Y

© Wärtsilä

Then… 5 August 2014

46 Wärtsilä

LS380 1% 693 $ CAD/mt… LSMGO 0.1% 1,058 $ CAD/mt… LNG 700 $ CAD/mt

Source: http://www.bunkerworld.com/prices/port/us/hou/

© Wärtsilä

Vehicle Driver Transport safely at optimal cost reliably

47 © Wärtsilä

Passenger and vehicles find competitive transport costs, plus LNG advantage

captures significant emissions reductions supporting green goals.

© Wärtsilä

Vehicle Owner Transport safely at optimal cost reliably

48 © Wärtsilä

LNG advantage captures significant CO2 emissions reductions supporting green

goals… LNG is ≈ 34% below HFO & ≈ 25% below diesel.

CO2 gm/

unit mile

25% 34%

© Wärtsilä

Ferry Owner A fair return capturing risks

49 © Wärtsilä

Compelling fuel payback for LNG an initial screening tool … not a good investment metric.

© Wärtsilä

ROCE Investment Criteria

50 © Wärtsilä

ROCE: reflects the company fundamental earning power.

Source: Robert Higgens, Analysis for Financial Management, 10th Edition, pg 53-55.

Return on Capital Employed

(Return on Invested Capital, ROIC ) reflects the company fundamental earning power as it removes the distorting effects of leverage inherent with Return on Equity (ROE).

Shipping companies often target 12% ROCE

© Wärtsilä

Ferry Owner A fair return capturing risks

51 © Wärtsilä

Investor finds LNG Competitive Advantage for return on capital… LNG hurdle rate

is highest & yet preserves passenger substantial emission reductions.

© Wärtsilä

Xxx

52 © Wärtsilä

Warren Buffett… World Famous Investor

EBITDA as equivalent to earnings for a company is tantamount to the Egyptian Pyramids: forever state of the art…with never a need to be replaced, improved or refurbished…

© Wärtsilä

The Pyramids

Earnings Before Interest Taxes Depreciation Amortization

EBITDA may overstate available cash flow… when used carefully and fully understood it may indicate what is available to pay bank debt and shareholders.

Often viewed as one of many economic indicators of company performance by financiers/investors/bankers.

Is often utilized when company has significant fixed assets.

53 © Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä 54 © Wärtsilä

LNG fuel has strongest EBITDA… + $2.8 Million over HFO+ Scrubber

and + $4.6 Million atop MDO.

Years

EBITDA

MDO Fuel

HFO +

Scrubber

LNG Fuel

Ferry Owner A fair return capturing risks

© Wärtsilä

Banker Are risks understood & I’m repaid !

55 © Wärtsilä

Banker finds debt cover is weakest on MDO fuel, LNG is strongest.

© Wärtsilä

The Pyramids

Earnings Before Interest Taxes

EBIT = Revenue minus expenses, excluding tax & interest

EBIT may conservatively understate available cash flow… when used carefully and fully understood it may indicate what is available to pay bank debt and shareholders.

Often viewed as one of many economic indicators of company performance by financiers/investors/bankers.

EBIT nulls the effects of different capital structures and tax rates.

EBIT was the precursor to EBITDA.

56 © Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä 57 © Wärtsilä

Years

EBIT

MDO Fuel

HFO +

Scrubber

LNG Fuel

Banker Are the risks understood and I’m repaid !

LNG has strongest EBIT… Depreciation Canada 25 years straight line, loan

retires year 10… Dry docking years 5,10,15,20

© Wärtsilä

Agenda

58 © Wärtsilä

What ? Fuel Price vs. Cost

Energy

Why & How ? No. Am ECA & Emissions

Owner Choices

Abatement: SCR, Scrubber, LNG

Business Case Cargo, Investor, Banker Views

ROPAX Ferry

Investment Returns

Oil Price Shock ! Business Case: Robust or Fragile?

Stress Test

Conclusions Business Case Appendix

© Wärtsilä

Global Recoverable Shale Gas Resource

13 June 2016

Top 5 hold over half of world’s

shale gas resource

tcfSource: http://www.eia.gov/conference/2013/pdf/presentations/kuuskraa.pdf

© Wärtsilä

Canada #5 Shale Gas Resource

573 tcf gas & 8.8 billion barrels oil

British Columbia…Gas favorable, commercial production, market challenges

Alberta/ Saskatchewan…Gas massive area & modest concentration, activity starting

Eastern Canada…Gas development moving slowly

13 June 2016

Source:http://www.eia.gov/conference/2013/pdf/presentations/kuuskraa.pdf

© Wärtsilä

28 November 2014

61 © Wärtsilä

Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-opec-meeting-

idUSKCN0JA0O320141128

Key OPEC Vienna

meeting sets stage for

market share battle.

Brent begins steep fall.

© Wärtsilä

5 January 2015

62 © Wärtsilä

Source: http://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanvardi/2015/01/05/saudi-

arabias-750-billion-bet-drives-brent-oil-below-54/

Exert Discipline in the

Marketplace amongst OPEC

and Non OPEC countries...

Key focus on market

share… oil prices plunging.

© Wärtsilä

Discipline Target US or Russia ?

63 © Wärtsilä

Russia suffering double whammy:

Oil rich Ukraine and Black Sea burdened by politics under imposed sanctions as oil takes severe price slide…

Ruble plunges down against USD

Source: http://online.wsj.com/articles/ruble-hits-new-low-as-oil-prices-drop-1417441184

Source: http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/11/10/an-oil-price-cold-war-with-saudi-arabia-not-

so-fast-experts-say

Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/ruble-plunging-again-2014-

12p://online.wsj.com/articles/ruble-hits-new-low-as-oil-prices-drop-1417441184

1 December 2014

© Wärtsilä

Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/citi-saudi-arabia-wont-win-this-oil-standoff-2014-11

64 © Wärtsilä

Profits negative…

Severe Pain

Profits squeezed…

Manageable Pain

Key Oil Production Cost

40 $/BBL

Brent Breakeven Price

Total Production

© Wärtsilä

Saudi Arabia

11.6 m BBL/day

Canada jumps to #4

2014 Production

65 © Wärtsilä

US vaults to 1st in

production oil and

other liquids

OPEC

OPEC

OPEC

OPEC

OPEC

OPEC

OPEC

Source:

ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countri

es_by_oil_production

http://www.eia.gov/beta/international/ranki

ngs/#?prodact=53-1&cy=2014OPEC

© Wärtsilä

Government Breakeven Budgets

66 © Wärtsilä

Source:

https://alfinnextlevel.files.w

ordpress.com/2014/04/oil_

breakeven_deutsche_bank

_oct_14.png

40 $/BBL

Severe shortfalls @ prices under 100$/BBL, present oil glut & soft prices challenge

sustainability beyond short run

© Wärtsilä

Brent Crude Oil Prices

67 © Wärtsilä

Source: http://www.nasdaq.com/markets/crude-oil-brent.aspx?timeframe=1y

THEN

NOW

Oil severe 60% price drop

past 20 months as

abundant supplies face

weak demand from China

and stagnant EU.

© Wärtsilä

What’s the impact of the steep fall in oil prices !

Is competitive advantage of LNG robust or fragile ?

68 © Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä

Exchange Rate 31 May 2016

Now

$1 US = $1.31 CAD

Then August 2014

$1 US = $1.09 CAD

Source: http://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=USD&to=CAD&view=5Y

© Wärtsilä

Recent Fuel Prices 30 May 2016

Montreal

IFO 380@ 332 $ CAD

MGO@ 763 $ CAD

LNG@ 515 $ CAD

Note: Exchange Rate$1 US = $1.31 CAD

Source: http://shipandbunker.com/prices/am

© Wärtsilä

Ferry Owner A fair return capturing risks of oil fall 30 May 2016

71 © Wärtsilä

LNG maintains strong investment returns, but HFO+SCR+Scrubber yields highest rates

amidst steep oil dive… Diesel + SCR remains 3rd place.

© Wärtsilä

Stress Test & Return On Capital Robustness or Fragility

72 © Wärtsilä

Deviation

ROCE

Ships are long term multi-decade

investments while fuel prices

fluctuate short term.

LNG provides superior returns

versus steeper slopes of higher

volatility traditional fuels.

LNG Win Win: emissions reduction & long term superior investment returns over many price

scenarios compared to traditional fuels. Strong HFO scrubber returns yield 2nd place

overall… most volatile is MGO.

Tier 3 IMO 100% ECA

© Wärtsilä

Fuel Stress Test: Tier 3 IMO 100% ECA

THEN 5 August 2014

13.64% @ LNG 700 $ CAD/mt

11.95% @ MDO 1,058 $ CAD/mt

12.50% @ HFO 693 $ CAD/mt

73 © Wärtsilä

Deviation

ROCE

NOW 30 May 2016

14.39% @ LNG 515 $/mt

13.39% @ MDO 763 $/mt

14.51% @ HFO 332 $/mt

Today HFO Scrubber is highest return on Capital Employed with steep bunkers drop.

LNG holds 2nd place as robust investment today’s market; MDO remains lowest returns.

© Wärtsilä

Why Volatile ?

13.6.2016 [Presentation name / Author]74

Changes to LNG underlying commodity variable costs have far less impact than Diesel.

Source: Pivotal LNG, An AGL Resources Company

Source:

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/8BVDiBNJwLY/h

qdefault.jpg

Source:

https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/220/50384011

1_e3b8a10f17_z.jpg?zz=1

LNG Diesel

© Wärtsilä

Agenda

75 © Wärtsilä

What ? Fuel Price vs. Cost

Energy

Why & How ? No. Am ECA & Emissions

Owner Choices

Abatement: SCR, Scrubber, LNG

Business Case Cargo, Investor, Banker Views

ROPAX Ferry

Investment Returns

Oil Price Shock ! Business Case: Robust or Fragile?

Stress Test

Conclusions Business Case Appendix

© Wärtsilä

APPENDIXBusiness Case Details

76 Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä

Financials

77 Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä

Key Values

78 Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä

Key Values

79 Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä

Fuel Attributes

80 © Wärtsilä

Utilize fuels specific for regional case... As fuels widely vary, the historic

dollars per ton or gallon is challenging to use as fuels host widely varying

energy content and density values. Numbers shown are representative.

© Wärtsilä

EBITDA

81 © Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä

EBIT

82 © Wärtsilä

© Wärtsilä

Weight Average Cost Capital WACC

83 © Wärtsilä

Source: http://www.investopedia.com/walkthrough/corporate-

finance/5/cost-capital/wacc.aspx

WACC may be used as a hurdle rate for NPV or to

assess ROIC (ROCE) performance.

© Wärtsilä

Cost of Capital - Divisional & Project Costs ( WACC cont. )

84 © Wärtsilä

Source: http://www.investopedia.com/walkthrough/corporate-

finance/5/cost-capital/wacc.aspx

WACC must be adjusted up or

down to properly reflect project

risks that differ from those of the

overall firm.

© Wärtsilä

Net Present Value & Internal Rate of Return

85 © Wärtsilä

Source: http://www.investopedia.com/walkthrough/corporate-

finance/5/cost-capital/wacc.aspx

IRR = discount rate that makes

NPV equal zero.

© Wärtsilä

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Keys

Global Energy Policies, market gamesmanship ?

Future Ahead, structural shifts?

As a vessel owner, all I want to knowis the tipping point…

What fuel strategy do I choose to to boost my bottom line & improve sustainability?

86 © Wärtsilä

A “Commodity Play” on fuel energy costs

seeking competitive advantage for market

share.