root classes and spatial arrangement trials
DESCRIPTION
Root classes and spatial arrangement trials of gmelina on the yield of zea maize: its impact on climate changeTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Root classes and spatial arrangement trials](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042714/5562f6b0d8b42a213b8b54a9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ROOT CLASSES AND SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT OF GMELINA: ITS
EFFECT ON MAIZE AND IMPACT ON CLIMATE CHANGE
ONOFRE S. CORPUZ, PHDCFCST Arakan, Cotabato
Onofre S. Corpuz, Ph.D
![Page 2: Root classes and spatial arrangement trials](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042714/5562f6b0d8b42a213b8b54a9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The relationship between root system development of planted tree species and its survival, stability and growth has attracted considerable research interest (Van Eerden and Kinghorn 1978; Somerville 1979; Coutts and Lewis 1983; Deans and Ford I983).
The intelligent application of plant combination requires an understanding of the various species interactions. Vandermeer (1989)
Intercropping of corn crops in Gmelina RGP trials at various spatial arrangements will be explored/investigate in this study
Estimation of Biomass and carbon density of the farming system As input to green house gas inventory in the Country
INTRODUCTION
Onofre S. Corpuz, Ph.D
![Page 3: Root classes and spatial arrangement trials](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042714/5562f6b0d8b42a213b8b54a9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The study was conducted on May 8 – August 23, 2007 (1st cropping) and September 16 – December 31, 2007 (2nd cropping) in a field trials of RGP of Gmelina planted at different spacing in Matalam Cotabato (Fig. 1)
The climate is warm tropical with mean annual temperature ranging from 28 oC – 40oC
Mean annual rainfall of 2,373.5mm. The soil is silty clay with pH value ranging from 6.2 to 7.2. Six months after outplanting, maize were sown in the furrows at
25cm x 60cm. Basal application of complete fertilizer (14-14-14) and side dressing
of urea (46-0-0) at a rate of 120-28-28 (prevailing farmer’s practice in the area) were employed.
METHODOLOGY
Onofre S. Corpuz, Ph.D
![Page 4: Root classes and spatial arrangement trials](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042714/5562f6b0d8b42a213b8b54a9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Fig. 1. Map showing the Study SiteOnofre S. Corpuz, Ph.D
![Page 5: Root classes and spatial arrangement trials](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042714/5562f6b0d8b42a213b8b54a9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
RESULTS
Figure 2. Grain Yield of corn on both cropping season as affected by tree spacing
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Gra
in Y
ield
(to
ns
/ha
)
Mono-corn 2m x 2m 2m x 3m 2m x 4m
Tree Sapcing
Crop 1 Crop 2
Onofre S. Corpuz, Ph.D
![Page 6: Root classes and spatial arrangement trials](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042714/5562f6b0d8b42a213b8b54a9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Gra
in Y
ield
(to
ns/h
a)
Mono-corn R1 R2 R3
RGP Classes
Crop 1 Crop 2
Figure 3. Grain Yield of corn on both cropping season as affected by RGP class
RESULTS
Onofre S. Corpuz, Ph.D
![Page 7: Root classes and spatial arrangement trials](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042714/5562f6b0d8b42a213b8b54a9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Onofre S. Corpuz, Ph.D
RGP DBH H NL YD WT500 BIOM LA LAIRGP 1.000 DBH 0.000 1.000
H 0.144 0.127 1.000 NL 0.159 0.133 0.354 1.000 YD -0.344 0.821** 0.106 0.138 1.000
WT500 -0.074 0.668** 0.173 0.171 0.677** 1.000 BIOM -0.454 0.862** 0.138 0.204 0.904** 0.605** 1.000
LA -0.124 0.187 0.072 -0.134 0.249 0.166 0.211 1.000 LAI -0.123 0.181 0.069 -0.129 0.241 0.162 0.205 0.999** 1.000
Table 1. Multiple correlation of the growth and yield of corn as affected by tree spacing and RGP classes.
RESULTS
** Highly significant
![Page 8: Root classes and spatial arrangement trials](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042714/5562f6b0d8b42a213b8b54a9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Onofre S. Corpuz, Ph.D
TREE SPACING CORN BIOMASS Crop 1 Crop 2Mono-corn crop 7.3000a 7.5867a2m x 2m 4.0233b 4.0367b2m x 3m 4.7800bc 3.8500b2m x 4m 5.3133c 4.5500b
Table 3. Mean corn biomass (tons/ha) in both cropping season as affected by tree spacing.
Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level
RESULTS
![Page 9: Root classes and spatial arrangement trials](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042714/5562f6b0d8b42a213b8b54a9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Onofre S. Corpuz, Ph.D
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8C
orn
Bio
mass (
ton
s/h
a)
Mono-corn R1 R2 R3
RGP Class
Crop 1 Crop 2
Figure 4. Corn Biomass in both cropping periods as affected by RGP classes
RESULTS
![Page 10: Root classes and spatial arrangement trials](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042714/5562f6b0d8b42a213b8b54a9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Onofre S. Corpuz, Ph.D
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
30 DAP 60 DAP 90 DAP 105 DAP
Measurement Day
Heig
ht (m
) Control
2m x 2m
2m x 3m
2m x 4m
Crop 1 Crop 2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
30 DAP 60 DAP 90 DAP 105 DAP
Measurement Day
Corn
heig
ht (m
)
Mono-corn R1 R2 R3
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
30 DAP 60 DAP 90 DAP 105 DAP
Tree Spacing
Corn
Heig
ht (
m)
Mono-corn R1 R2 R3
Measurement Day
Crop 1 Crop 2
RESULTS
![Page 11: Root classes and spatial arrangement trials](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042714/5562f6b0d8b42a213b8b54a9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Figure 11. Leaf area index as affected by tree spacing
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Leaf
Are
a I
nd
ex
Mono-corn 2m x 2m 2m x 3m 2m x 4m
Tree Spacing
Crop 1 Crop 2
RESULTS
Onofre S. Corpuz, Ph.D
![Page 12: Root classes and spatial arrangement trials](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042714/5562f6b0d8b42a213b8b54a9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3L
ea
f A
rea
In
de
x
Mono-corn R1 R2 R3
Tree Spacing
Crop 1 Crop 2
R G P C l a s s
Figure 12. Leaf area index of as affected by RGP classes
RESULTS
Onofre S. Corpuz, Ph.D
![Page 13: Root classes and spatial arrangement trials](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042714/5562f6b0d8b42a213b8b54a9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
SOURCES AGB (MG/HA) RB (MG/HA)CARBON DENSITY
(MG/HA)Tree components 4.3 1.3 2.52
Corn Component 5.18 2.33
SOC 2.74
Total 7.59
Table 4: Biomass and carbon density of the farming system
RESULTS
Onofre S. Corpuz, Ph.D
![Page 14: Root classes and spatial arrangement trials](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042714/5562f6b0d8b42a213b8b54a9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Figure 13. Path correlation analysis
RESULTS
Onofre S. Corpuz, Ph.D
![Page 15: Root classes and spatial arrangement trials](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042714/5562f6b0d8b42a213b8b54a9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The intercropped maize showed significant difference in all agronomic and morphological characters in the 2nd cropping Mono-corn crop dominated significantly in all traits Tree spacing was significantly related to corn yield and biomassRGP class was insignificantly and negatively correlated with corn yield, biomass, leaf area and leaf area index. The significant relationship of tree spacing with corn yield, and biomass implies that wider tree spacing will mean higher yield in corn and the reversed is true with the negative relationship.The farming system stored C of 7.6Mt/ha at 1 year
CONCLUSION
Onofre S. Corpuz, Ph.D
![Page 16: Root classes and spatial arrangement trials](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042714/5562f6b0d8b42a213b8b54a9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Intercropping of corn with Gmelina at the early stage (not more than a year) with wider tree spacing is possible
A reducing corn yield would be expected when trying to intercrop corn in an older Gmelina
RECOMMENDATIONS
Onofre S. Corpuz, Ph.D
![Page 17: Root classes and spatial arrangement trials](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042714/5562f6b0d8b42a213b8b54a9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
The End….
Thank You!!!
Onofre S. Corpuz, Ph.D