rone

5
Chapter 3 METHODOLOGY In this chapter, the researcher present the research method used, the respondents of the study, the date gathering instruments and statistical tools for date analysis. Research Design This study aimed to determined the performance level BSMT 3 and BSMAR-E 3 students math of VMA Global College this 1 st semester of A.Y. 2011-2012. To meet the objective of this study the descriptive research design will be used to describe the nature of situation or a given state of affairs in terms of specified aspects or factors or characteristic of individual or group or physical environment or conditions (David 2002). With this study the researcher want to know if there is a significant difference to the performance level between the BSMT 3 to BSMAR-E 3 students in math of the VMA Global

Upload: rone-ryan-desierto

Post on 26-May-2015

208 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rone

Chapter 3METHODOLOGY

In this chapter, the researcher present the research method used, the respondents

of the study, the date gathering instruments and statistical tools for date analysis.

Research Design

This study aimed to determined the performance level BSMT 3 and BSMAR-E 3

students math of VMA Global College this 1st semester of A.Y. 2011-2012.

To meet the objective of this study the descriptive research design will be used to

describe the nature of situation or a given state of affairs in terms of specified aspects or

factors or characteristic of individual or group or physical environment or conditions

(David 2002). With this study the researcher want to know if there is a significant

difference to the performance level between the BSMT 3 to BSMAR-E 3 students in

math of the VMA Global College for the first semester of 2011-2012. Likewise the study

would give an insights to the faculty in the administration to deliver quality education.

Page 2: Rone

Subject /Respondents

The respondents of the study are the third year students of the VMA Global College that will be given self-administered questionnaires.

The surveyed total population is 400. However, the respondents are selected in terms of section. The total number of section of which is 7 (as the present S.Y. 2011-2012) the respondent for section are selected randomly to present their section as a group; the researcher will have to survey the respondents.

Total Population - 400Total number of section - 7No. o students in every Section =No. of Male = 400No. Female = 0

Using the Lynch formula, the researcher got the number of sample subject to present to population on which is based on any statement about the population from which it is drawn.

n=NZ 2 p(1-p) Ne2 +Z2p(1-p)

Where:

n = Of sample subjectN = Total number of sectione = Margin Error (5% or 0.05%)z = Confidence level valueP = Largest possible portion, usually 50% or 0.5

Sampling Technique

Page 3: Rone

The sampling that we will utilize in this study is a sample random sampling,

which is the basic and best-know probability sampling design that give each unit of the

population an equal probability or chance of being included in the sample.

From the list of total number of sections in VMA Global College respondents will be selected randomly using the table of random numbers. The researchers will select randomly the section they want to survey. Out of 7 sections the researchers decide to randomly select 2 sections of BSMT 3 and BSMAR-E 3 students of the VMA Global College. Then the researchers decided to focus on 44 respondents in every selected sections.

Data Collection

The data that will be used the study will be obtain by using a self-administered questionnaire.

The questionnaire will be given to 44 students of VMA Global College. It will be properly filled up and the questionnaire will be retrieved by the researchers. The data will be obtained from the questionnaires will be subjected to the analysis of the data.

Validity of Research Instrument

To test the validity of the instruments, content validity will be used. The instrument will be shown to 3 jurors for them to go over the items to job the appropriateness and to make accommodation in order to improve the research instrument. Each jurors was requested to analyze and rate the questionnaire based on criteria presented by Carter V. Good and Douglas B. Scates. Validation for questionnaire rated 3.7 which interpreted “Very Good”.