ron remillard kavli center for astrophysics and space research
DESCRIPTION
INPE Advanced Course on Compact Objects Course IV: Accretion Processes in Neutron Stars & Black Holes. Ron Remillard Kavli Center for Astrophysics and Space Research Massachusetts Institute of Technology http://xte.mit.edu/~rr/inpe_IV.2.ppt. IV.2 X-ray States of Black Hole Binaries. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
INPE Advanced Course on Compact Objects
Course IV: Accretion Processes in Neutron Stars & Black Holes
Ron RemillardKavli Center for Astrophysics and Space ResearchMassachusetts Institute of Technology
http://xte.mit.edu/~rr/inpe_IV.2.ppt
IV.2 X-ray States of Black Hole Binaries Thermal States and Accretion Disk Models
Defining States: Energy and Power Density Spectra Observational Support for the Multicolor Disk Model Applying Relativistic Disk Models
Hard State, Jets, and Microquasars Hard State and a Steady Jet Advection Models (ADAF and CDAF) Synchrotron/Compton Models
Steep Power-Law of Black Hole Binaries Summary of Properties Link to High-Frequency QPOs
Further Considerations of BH X-ray States Overview of X-ray State Evolution Alternative Descriptions of X-ray States Statistics of State Occupations
X-ray States of BHBs
1. Thermal State:
inner accretion disk
X-ray States of BHBs
1. Thermal State: fdisk > 75%; rms < 0.075 ; no QPOs (amax < 0.5%)
inner accretion disk
Thermal State ParadigmTheory: Hot gas in thin disk + viscous dissipation Rel. MHD: Plasma + Magneto-Rotational Instability
Thermal radiation ; weakly magnetized disk
T(r) r-p; p ~ 0.7 (Kubota et al 2005) (GR tweak of p=0.75)
modified disk blackbody
GX339-4 Relativistic Fe line
blackbody energetics GR/Keplerian velocities?
Kubota & Done 2004; Gierlinski & Done 2004
e.g. Miller et al. 2004; butsee Merloni & Fabian 2003
Emissivity vs. Radius in the Accretion Disk
GR Applications for Thermal State
Shakura & Sunyaev 1973; Makishima et al. 1986; Gierlinski et al. 1999; Zimmerman et al. 2005
Page & Thorne 1974; Zhang, Cui, & Chen 1997Gierlinski et al. 2001; Li et al. 2005
Relativistic Accretion Disk: Spectral Models
GR Applications for Thermal State
e.g. kerrbb in xspecLi et al. 2005; Davis et al. 2005
• Integrate over disk and B(T)
• Correct for GR effects(grav-z, Doppler, grav-focusing)
• Radiative transfer (i.e. f factor)
Thermal state X-ray spectra BH spin
Shafee et al. 2006; Davis, Done & Blaes 2006; McClintock et al. 2006
• Input Mx, d(kpc), disk inclination (i)
• Run model trials for values of:(viscosity parameter)model Comptonization (comptt, power-law, broken pow.)fit hardening factor vs. use Davis and Blaes model
• Derive a* (for various trials) in range of Lx
BH spin
McClintock et al. 2006
BH spin
McClintock et al. 2006
theory: disk should thicken near Lx ~ 0.3 LEDD
Thermal state BH spin
Shafee et al. 2006: a* ~ 0.75 for GROJ1655-40, 4U1543-47
Davis, Done & Blaes 2006: “moderate spin” (0.1-0.8) for XTEJ1550-564, LMC X-3
McClintock et al. 2006: a* > 0.98 for GRS1915+105
------
Systematic concerns:
• Are -disk assumptions valid?
• Theory of radiative transfer (hardening factor) accurate?
• ISCO is smeared by B-coupling? (Page & Throne 1974; Agol & Krolik 2000)
Hard State of BHBs 2. Hard State fdisk < 20%; ~ 1.4 - 2.1; rms > 0.10
steady jet
Hard State of BHBs: Steady Radio Jet
2. Hard State fdisk < 20%; ~ 1.4 - 2.1; rms > 0.10
radio : X-ray correlations: Corbel et al. 2000; Gallo et al. 2003
Hard State of BHBs: Steady Radio Jet
Corbel et al. 2000
Hard State of BHBs: Steady Radio Jet
50730 50740 50750
MJD
GRS1915+105 Oct. 1 – Nov. 7, 1997
X-ray c/s
H-ray HR
Radio Flux
Radio index
Modeling the Hard State
ADAF models:(Advection-Dominated Accretion Flow)
• transition: Keplerian to quasi-radial inflow at ~100-500 Rg
• energy ‘advected’ into BH• electrons can still radiate some synchrotron and inverse Compton
controversies! Model evolution!ADAF CDAF (convective DAF)
more outflow
XTEJ1118+480 (low NH)….truncated, cool disk(McClintock et al. 2001)
Modeling the Hard State
Hybrid models:• Synchrotron/Compton (Markoff, Nowak, & Wilms 2005) Kalemci et al. 2005
• ADAF-fed Syn./Comp.? (Yuan, Cui, & Narayan 2005)
XTEJ1118+480 synchrotron model(Markoff et al. 2001)
States of Black Hole Binaries
3. steep power law compact corona ?
> 2.4; rms < 0.15 ;
fdisk < 80% + QPOs (or fdisk< 50%)
mechanism? : inverse Compton
origin? : magnetized disk ?Energy spectra Power density spectra
1 10 100 .01 .1 1 10 100 Energy (keV) Frequency (Hz)
Neutron stars (atoll type) have thermal and hardStates, but they never show SPL-dominated spectra
Steep Power Law
Gamma Ray Bright State(Grove et al. 1998)
blackbody energetics
SPL
|
Physical Models for BHB StatesEnergy spectra Power density spectra
State physical picture
steep power law Disk + ??
thermal
hard state
Energy (keV) Frequency (Hz)
Are they different?
Very different X-ray spectra Extremely Different Gamma Ray Spectra QPOs vs. none
Conclusions: Do not combine thermal and SPL “soft” 3 X-ray States 3 Accretion Systems
Comparing SPL vs. Thermal States
High Frequency QPOs (40-450 Hz)
High Frequency QPOs
source HFQPO (Hz)
GRO J1655-40 300, 450
XTE J1550-564 184, 276
GRS 1915+105 41, 67, 113, 168
XTE J1859+226 190
4U1630-472 184 + broad features (Klein-Wolt et al. 2003)
XTE J1650-500 250
H1743-322 166, 242-------
ISCO for 10 Mo BH: = 220 Hz (a* = 0.0) 728 Hz (a* = 0.9)
Condensations at preferred radii QPOs (Schnittman & Bertschinger 2004)
High Frequency QPOs
source HFQPO (Hz)
GRO J1655-40 300, 450
XTE J1550-564 184, 276
GRS 1915+105 41, 67, 113, 168
XTE J1859+226 190
4U1630-472 184
XTE J1650-500 250
H1743-322 165, 241 -------
4 HFQPO pairs with frequencies in 3:2 ratio
HFQPO Frequencies vs. BH Mass
GROJ1655, XTEJ1550,
and GRS1915+105
qpo at 2o: o = 931 Hz / Mx
Same QPO mechanism and similar value of a*
Compare subclasses
while model efforts continue
HFQPOs Mechanisms Diskoseismology (Wagoner 1999 ; Kato 2001)
obs. frequencies require nonlinear modes?
Resonance in Inner Disk (Abramowicz & Kluzniak 2001). Parametric Resonance (coupling in GR frequencies for {r, }
Abramowicz et al. 2004 ; Kluzniak et al. 2004; Lee et al. 2005) Resonance with Global Disk Warp (S. Kato 2004)
MHD Simulations and HFQPOs (Y. Kato 2005)
Torus Models (Rezzolla et al. 2003; Fragile et al. 2005) GR ray tracing of accretion torus (Bursa et al.)
AEI + Rossby vortex (Tagger & Varniere 2006)
BH Outbursts & States
GRO J1655-40
1996-97 outburst
Thermal x
Hard (jet)
Steep Power Law
Intermediate O
“Unified Model for Jets in BH Binaries”Fender, Belloni, & Gallo 2004 Remillard 2005
Hard Color
X-rayintensity
BH States: OverviewGX339-4
Mx = 5 – 15 Mo
Frequent outbursts: 1970 - 2005+ extended, faint, hard states
Thermal x
Hard (jet)
Steep Power Law
Intermediate O
BH States: Overview
GRO J1655-40
1996-97 outburst
Thermal x
Hard (jet)
Steep Power Law
Intermediate O
BH States: OverviewH1743-322
Mx unknown (ISM dust)
HEAO-1 outburst: 1977RXTE: 2003; minor outburst 2005
Thermal x
Hard (jet)
Steep Power Law
Intermediate O
BH States: OverviewXTEJ1550-564
Mx = 9.6 + 1.2 Mo
Outbursts: 1998 ; smaller, 2000; + 3 faint hard-state outbursts
2001, 2002, 2003
Thermal x
Hard (jet)
Steep Power Law
Intermediate O
Black Hole States: Statistics
XTE J1550-564 GRO J1655-40 XTE J1118+480
Steep Power Law 26 15 0Thermal 147 47 0Low/hard 22 2 10
Intermediate 57 2 0
Timescales (days) for state (all BH Binaries)
duration transitionsSteep Power Law 1-10 <1Thermal 3-200 1-10Low/hard 3-200 1-5
Intermediate 3-30 1-3
Low Frequency QPOs (0.05-30 Hz)
XTE J1550-5641998 Sept. 23
QPO: 4 Hz, 12% rms
Q ~ 9
Flux 2 Crab (~0.2 LEdd)
fdisk = 0.1
QPO wave tracking
random walk in phase(Morgan et al. 1997)
Low Frequency QPOs : Subtypes
Type: A B CPhase Lag: soft hard near zero (Hz): ~8 ~6 0.1 – 15a (rms %) few few 5 – 20 Q : 2 – 3 ~10 ~10State: SPL SPL Hard/Int.
HFQPO coupling yes, 3o yes, 2o no HFQPOs
Wijnands et al. 1999
Cui et al. 1999
Remillard et al. 2002
Rodriguez et al. 2004
Casella et al. 2005
QPOs across states Jet INT SPL
?? diff. mechanism ?? evolution in magnetic instability
XTEJ1550-564
LFQPO Mechanisms Periastron precession of emitting blobs in GR (Stella et al. 1999)
Frame Dragging in GR (Stella & Vietri 1998; Fragile et al. 2001)
Resonance oscillation sidebands (Horak et al. 2004)
p-mode oscillations in a truncated disk (Giannios & Spruit 2004)
Inertial-Acoustic oscillations (Milson & Taam 1997)
Global disk oscillations (Titarchuk & Osherovich 2000)
Alfven waves (C.M. Zhang et al. 2005)
Accretion-Ejection Instability in disk (magnetic spiral waves)
(Tagger & Pellat 1999)
Radial oscillations in accretion shocks
(Molteni et al. 1996; Chakrabarti & Manickam 2000)
QPO Frequency vs. Disk Flux
? different types of magnetized disk ?