rolling stones vs. soil erosion

40
Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion Bienvenido “Nonoy” Oplas, Jr. Millora Farms Bugallon, Pangasinan WASWAC-BSWM Seminar on Soil Management Bureau of Soil and Water Management, DA, Quezon City May 12, 2014

Upload: nonoy-oplas

Post on 07-May-2015

129 views

Category:

Environment


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Photos of stone terraces, erosion control, treehouse, irrigation, ricefields, creek. Presented at a WASWAC meeting at Bu. of Soils and Water Management, DA.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion

Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion

Bienvenido “Nonoy” Oplas, Jr.

Millora Farms

Bugallon, Pangasinan

WASWAC-BSWM Seminar on Soil Management Bureau of Soil and Water Management, DA, Quezon City May 12, 2014

Page 2: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion

Outline 1.The Farm, Pangasinan 2.The Rolling Stones 3.Old Terraces 4.Various Terraces 5.Pool in the Creek 6.Treehouse 7.Irrigation and Ricefields 8.Concluding Notes

Page 3: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion

1. The Farm, Location • Brgy. Laguit Padilla, Bugallon,

Pangasinan • About 7 kms. From the highway in

Bugallon, which is 198 kms. From Manila

• Midland to upland farm; main crops are mangos and forest trees

Page 4: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion

2. The Rolling Stones

• Not Mick Jagger and his rock band • Though being a rock fan, I like their

name and songs • But stones, big and small, in the nearby

creek in the farm

Page 5: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion
Page 6: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion

3. Old Terraces, 2004-2005

• Built after the bigger treehouse was finished in March 2004

• Mahogany trees then were still small. We started planting a few trees in 1992

• The stones were gathered manually from a nearby creek.

Page 7: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion
Page 8: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion

4. Various Terraces

• Mostly around the treehouse, left, back, right.

• Stabilized and enriched the soil, reduced flash flood, strengthened the trees, help beautify the place

• At times though, the stones become hiding place of some crawlers: small snakes, reptiles, soil spider.

Page 9: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion
Page 10: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion
Page 11: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion
Page 12: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion
Page 13: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion
Page 14: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion
Page 15: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion

Near decomposing dried leaves in danger of being washed by flash flood (top left), collected and cleared (above), and put in an expanded terrace (left) with old deposit of organic materials. Average Height about 0.5 meter, Length about 5 meters, Width about 2.5 meters. Volume = H x L x W = 6.25 cubic meters.

Page 16: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion
Page 17: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion
Page 18: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion

Under the treehouse. Old formation, about 5 years ago. This has been damaged by a strong flash flood in recent years.

Page 19: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion
Page 20: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion

• Totally blocking a small water pathway with lots of stones, big and small.

• Dried leaves, pruned branches and some wild but inferior vegetation, were deposited at the back to decompose and become soil

• The stone formation in the front has evolved (next slide).

Page 21: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion

• Back of this stone structure has become a mini-pond during the rainy season.

• Trapped lots of top soil, mud and organic matter. It is becoming thicker and higher.

Page 22: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion
Page 23: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion
Page 24: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion

How much trapped soil so far? Last March, we measured about 5 meters from the 3rd row of stones: about 1 foot deep. about 6 feet wide = 6 sq. ft from that distance. It’s deeper than 1 ft near the stones, shallower from this spot. Dried leaves cover not included in this depth, only the trapped soil.

Page 25: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion

• How tall is this rock structure, our respective height would show. Should be at least 6 feet high.

• Full time caretaker Nong Endring Paragas (right), and his son Danny Paragas (below), part time

Page 26: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion

5. Pool in the Creek

• Built in late 2005; no cement, only big and small stones gathered to impound free-flowing water

• Visited by many friends from Manila and abroad.

• Short-lived, from October 2005 to May 2006. By June, flash flood started destroying the stones.

Page 27: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion
Page 28: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion

6. Treehouse * 2002 vs. 2014 versions

Page 29: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion
Page 30: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion
Page 31: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion
Page 32: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion
Page 33: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion

7. Irrigation and ricefields

• Impounding the upper creek with stones, sandbags and cogon. Very effective. The cogon is alive, expanding its roots

• Diverted water goes to the nearby ricefield in front of the treehouse.

Page 34: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion

• Old, cemented, mini-dam and water impounding structure. Water is diverted to the next field across the creek

• Strong flash floods have damaged and removed the big rocks supporting this mini dam.

Page 35: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion
Page 36: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion

• Ricefield across the creek that benefit from the diverted water of the mini-dam.

• There is spring water that develops above this area during the rainy season.

• For now the field is idle. Our caretaker is old enough to till this wide area.

Page 37: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion

8. Concluding Notes

• Building stone terraces has been very useful for us in the farm. They performed 3 basic functions: (1) control soil erosion, (2) reduced flash flood, the trapped organic matter and topsoil have become natural “sponge” that absorbed lots of rainwater; and (3) helped beautify the place.

• Pure human labor, no cement, no machineries, no government funds or subsidies were used. Revenues from selling some trees/lumber, charcoal, help fund the labor cost to build and expand the terraces, repair the treehouse.

Page 38: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion

• Thanks to our caretaker and extra workers (hired only when funds would allow)

• Finally, thanks to Dr. Samran Sombatpanit, Past President, World Association for Soil and Water Conservation (WASWAC) for inviting me to present in this unique seminar at the BSWM.

• Read more about the farm, http://sustaindevelopment.blogspot.com/

• Nonoy Oplas, [email protected]

Page 39: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion
Page 40: Rolling Stones vs. Soil Erosion