roland berger global automotive supplier study 20110911
TRANSCRIPT
"A4r
b_sp
eech
" –
2010
0111
–do
not
del
ete
this
text
obj
ect!
September 2011
Short version
Global Automotive Supplier Study
"A4r
b_sp
eech
" –
2010
0111
–do
not
del
ete
this
text
obj
ect!
2Global Automotive Supplier Study 2011_SHORT_final.pptx
Management summary
> Driven by booming car sales, the global automotive supplier industry achieved record profitability in 2010 (6.2% EBIT margin on global average)
> However, financial performance of suppliers differs heavily depending on headquarter region, company size and product focus.
– European suppliers achieved an EBIT margin of almost 7%, while North American and Japanese suppliers remain below global average
– Small and medium-sized suppliers have significantly improved their profitability compared to pre-crisis levels
– Chassis focused suppliers achieved the highest profitability, while Interior and Electric suppliers remain below average
> Revenue outlooks for 2011 full-year and for 2012 are relatively stable. Also profitability is expected to stay at a reasonable level, but drop below 6% EBIT margin on a global average
> Besides keeping profitability at a high level and ensuring real global delivery capability, suppliers need to put an even stronger focus on product innovation. Only suppliers who can differentiate themselves from competition via superior product functionality will be able to sustainably achieve EBIT margins in the range of 6% and above. Most other suppliers will get further pushed into the commodity corner, where their profit will be locked-in at a 3-4% level
Source: Roland Berger/Lazard
"A4r
b_sp
eech
" –
2010
0111
–do
not
del
ete
this
text
obj
ect!
3Global Automotive Supplier Study 2011_SHORT_final.pptx
Key supplier performance indicators 2000-2010 (n = ~600 suppliers)
Revenue growth [2000=100] EBIT margin1) [%] ROCE2) [%]
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
156
129
154
162
148
136
125
114
108103
100
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
1.61.1
5.7
4.75.15.2
4.74.2
3.1
5.3
6.2
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
2.52.0
10.1
8.18.8
9.3
8.3
7.2
5.0
8.4
11.1
1) EBIT after restructuring items 2) EBIT after restructuring items/capital employed
Driven by booming car sales, the global automotive supplier industry achieved record profitability in 2010
Source: Company information; Roland Berger/Lazard
"A4r
b_sp
eech
" –
2010
0111
–do
not
del
ete
this
text
obj
ect!
4Global Automotive Supplier Study 2011_SHORT_final.pptx
However, financial performance of suppliers differs heavily depending on region, company size and product focus
1 2 3> European suppliers improved
average EBIT margin to ~7%
> Chinese and Korean suppliers achieved double-digit EBITmargins
> Nafta suppliers improved, but still have the lowest profitability
> Japanese suppliers also below average
> Small/mid-sized suppliers (below 1bn EUR revenues) achieved highest profitability
> Suppliers with >10 bn EUR revenues show lowest profitability levels
> Chassis and Exterior focused suppliers with strongest margin improvements
> Powertrain and Tire suppliers still above average
> Interior and Electric/Infotainment suppliers significantly below average around the world
REGION COMPANY SIZE PRODUCT FOCUS
Source: Roland Berger/Lazard
Profitability trends in the global automotive supplier industry
"A4r
b_sp
eech
" –
2010
0111
–do
not
del
ete
this
text
obj
ect!
5Global Automotive Supplier Study 2011_SHORT_final.pptx
European suppliers achieved an EBIT margin of almost 7%, while North American and Japanese suppliers remain below global average
Supplier EBIT profitability by headquarter region 2010 vs. 2007
EBIT1)
margin[%]
Change 2010 vs. 2007 [%-pts.]
Europe NAFTA Japan China Korea Rest of Asia WORLD
+3.0 +0.4 +0.5-0.4 +2.4+0.4 +1.0
6.96.5
2007 2010
4.33.3
2007 2010
5.66.0
2007 2010
11.5
9.1
2007 2010
8.8
5.8
2007 2010
9.99.5
2007 2010
6.25.7
2007 2010
1 REGION
1) EBIT after restructuring items
Source: Company information; Roland Berger/Lazard
"A4r
b_sp
eech
" –
2010
0111
–do
not
del
ete
this
text
obj
ect!
6Global Automotive Supplier Study 2011_SHORT_final.pptx
Small and medium-sized suppliers have significantly improved their profitability compared to pre-crisis levels
Supplier EBIT profitability by company size 2010 vs. 2007
<0.5 bn 0.5-1.0 bn 1.0-2.5 bn 2.5-5.0 bn 5.0-10.0 bn >10.0 bn ALL
+1.2 0.0 +0.5+0.6 +0.6+1.1 +2.2Change 2010 vs. 2007 [%-pts.]
2007 2010 2007 2010 2007 2010 2007 2010 2007 2010 2007 2010 2007 2010
2 SIZE
1) EBIT after restructuring items
EBIT1)
margin[%]
6.25.7
6.2
5.1
7.3
5.1
6.55.9 6.1
5.5
6.7
5.55.95.9
Source: Company information; Roland Berger/Lazard
"A4r
b_sp
eech
" –
2010
0111
–do
not
del
ete
this
text
obj
ect!
7Global Automotive Supplier Study 2011_SHORT_final.pptx
Chassis focused suppliers achieved the highest profitability, while Interior and Electric suppliers remain below average
Change 2010 vs. 2007 [%-pts.]
2007 2010 2007 2010 2007 2010 2007 2010 2007 2010 2007 2010 2007 2010
1) EBIT after restructuring items
EBIT1)
margin[%]
6.25.7
6.66.9
7.8
6.77.4
5.1
6.66.7
5.04.4
4.85.3
3 PRODUCT FOCUS
Supplier EBIT profitability by product focus 2010 vs. 2007
Electric/info.Powertrain Chassis Exterior Tires Interior ALL
-0.1 +0.6 +0.5+1.1 +2.3 -0.5-0.3
Source: Company information; Roland Berger/Lazard
"A4r
b_sp
eech
" –
2010
0111
–do
not
del
ete
this
text
obj
ect!
8Global Automotive Supplier Study 2011_SHORT_final.pptx
Global supplier performance 2000-20101)
Revenue growth [2000=100] ROCE [%]
6.3
2008
-5.6
8.3
2007
2.9
15.2
2006
-0.2
12.9
2005
2.3
13.0
2004
3.7
14.0
-1.5
4.1
13.6
2002
4.3
13.1
2001 2010
2.7
17.1
2009
0.8
9.8
2000
6.7
11.7
2003
255
239247
193
120106
100
218
166
74
99112
10499102999694 90
2008
207
2009 20102006200520042003
136
200220012000 2007
TOP
LOW
TOP
LOW
Industry average
The 2008/2009 crisis has further broadened the gap between Top and Low performers in the supplier industry
1) Top = Top quartile, Low = Bottom quartile
Source: Company information; Roland Berger/Lazard
"A4r
b_sp
eech
" –
2010
0111
–do
not
del
ete
this
text
obj
ect!
9Global Automotive Supplier Study 2011_SHORT_final.pptxSource: Company information; Roland Berger/Lazard
156
129
154
162
148
136
125
114108
103100
01 02 03 04 05
~160
0600 07 08 09 10 11
5.3
060504030201
3.1
6.2
1.61.1
5.75.15.2
4.74.2
4.7~5.5
00 1110090807
2.0
10.1
8.18.8
9.38.3
09 1110
11.1~10
2.5
08070605
7.2
5.0
8.4
00 01 02 03 04
1) EBIT after restructuring items 2) EBIT after restructuring items/capital employed
Our forecast for 2011 full-year financial performance: global average profitability is expected to drop below 6% EBIT
Key supplier performance indicators 2000-2011e
> Still very good sales in BRIC markets> Stable mature markets
> Cool-down in China> OEM price pressure back to pre-crisis levels> Increased raw material prices
Negative drivers:
Positive drivers:
Revenue growth [2000=100] EBIT margin1) [%] ROCE2) [%]
"A4r
b_sp
eech
" –
2010
0111
–do
not
del
ete
this
text
obj
ect!
10Global Automotive Supplier Study 2011_SHORT_final.pptx
The general industry framework for automotive suppliers will remain challenging
Source: Roland Berger/Lazard
Trends shaping the supplier industry in the future
Car buyers
Regional shift
Price sensitivity
Legislation
CO2 reduction
Emission reduction
Safety regulations
OEMs
Localization of production (to sales markets)
Overcapacity/ restructuring (triad)
Increased technological complexity
Raw material markets
Provider consolidation
Rising demand (from other industries)
Capital markets
High volatility of capital markets
Loss of confidenceof investors
SUPPLIERS
Further increased MARGIN
PRESSURE and stronger need for differentiation via
INNOVATION
Reduced price level
Additional cost
Increasing prices
Increasing capital costsNew opportunities
Additional cost saving measures
Increased price pressure
"A4r
b_sp
eech
" –
2010
0111
–do
not
del
ete
this
text
obj
ect!
This presentation was prepared by Lazard & Co. GmbH ("Lazard") and Roland Berger Strategy Consultants ("RBSC") exclusively for the
benefit and internal use of our clients and solely as a basis for discussion of certain topics related to the automotive supplier industry
described herein. This presentation is strictly confidential and may not be reproduced, summarized or disclosed, in whole or in part,
without the prior written authorization both of Lazard and RBSC, and by accepting this presentation you hereby agree to be bound by the
restrictions contained herein.
This presentation is based on publicly available information which have not been independently verified by Lazard or RBSC. Any
estimates and projections contained herein involve significant elements of subjective judgment and analysis, which may or may not be
correct. None of Lazard, any of its affiliates, or any of its direct or indirect shareholders, or any of its or their respective members,
employees or agents nor RBSC provide any guarantee or warranty (express or implied) or assumes any responsibility with respect to the
authenticity, origin, validity, accuracy or completeness of the information and data contained herein or assumes any obligation for
damages, losses or costs (including, without limitation, any direct or consequential losses) resulting from any errors or omissions in this
presentation.
The economic valuations contained in this presentation are necessarily based on current market conditions, which may change
significantly over a short period of time. Changes and events occurring after the date hereof may, therefore, affect the validity of the
conclusions contained in this presentation and nor Lazard nor RBSC assume any obligation to update and/or revise this presentation or
the information and data upon which it has been based.