rock_mass
TRANSCRIPT
ROCK MASS CLASSIFICATION
Presented by:
Neil Benson
Rock Mass ClassificationRock Mass Classification
• Why?• How does this help us in tunnel design?
Rock Mass ClassificationRock Mass ClassificationWHY?WHY?
Ground interactionGround interaction
Summary of rock mass characteristics, testingSummary of rock mass characteristics, testingmethods and theoretical considerationsmethods and theoretical considerations
Types of failure which occur in rock massesTypes of failure which occur in rock massesunder low and high in-situ stress levelsunder low and high in-situ stress levels
Relationship between support pressureRelationship between support pressureand tunnel deformation for different ratios of rockand tunnel deformation for different ratios of rock
mass strength to in-situ stressmass strength to in-situ stress
Estimates of support capacity for tunnelsEstimates of support capacity for tunnelsof different sizesof different sizes
Engineering Rock Mass Classification SchemesEngineering Rock Mass Classification Schemes
• Developed for estimation of tunnel support
• Used at project feasibility and preliminary design stages
• Simple check lists or detailed schemes
• Used to develop a picture of the rock mass and its
variability
• Used to provide initial empirical estimates of tunnel
support requirements
• Are practical engineering tools which force the user to
examine the properties of the rock mass
• Do Not replace detailed design methods
• Project specific
Terzaghi’s Rock Mass Classification (1946)Terzaghi’s Rock Mass Classification (1946)
• Rock Mass Descriptions
– Intact
– Stratified
– Moderately jointed
– Blocky and Seamy
– Crushed
– Squeezing
– Swelling
Rock Quality Designation Index (RQD)Rock Quality Designation Index (RQD)(Deere et al. 1967)(Deere et al. 1967)
• Aim : to provide a quantitative estimate of rock mass
quality from drill logs
• Equal to the percentage of intact core pieces longer than
100mm in the total length of core
RQDRQD
• Directionally dependant parameter
• Intended to indicate rock mass quality in-situ
• Adapted for surface exposures as ‘Jv’ number of
discontinuities per unit volume
• Used as a component in the RMR and Q systems
Procedure for Measurement and Calculation of RQDProcedure for Measurement and Calculation of RQD
Weathering of Basalt with depthWeathering of Basalt with depth
Multi parameter Rock Mass Classification Multi parameter Rock Mass Classification SchemesSchemes
• Rock Mass Structure Rating (RSR)
• Rock Mass Rating (RMR)
• Rock Tunnelling Quality Index (Q)
Rock Mass Structure Rating (RSR) (1972)Rock Mass Structure Rating (RSR) (1972)
• Introduced the concept of rating components to arrive at
a numerical value
• Demonstrates the logic in a quasi-quantitative rock mass
classification
• Has limitations as based on small tunnels supported by
steel sets only
• RSR = A + B + C
Rock Structure RatingRock Structure RatingParameter A: General area geologyParameter A: General area geology
Considers (a) rock type origin(b) rock ‘hardness’(c) geotechnical structure
Considers (a) joint spacing(b) joint orientation (strike and dip)(c) direction of tunnel drive
Rock Structure RatingRock Structure RatingParameter B: Geometry : Effect of discontinuity patternParameter B: Geometry : Effect of discontinuity pattern
Considers (a) overall rock mass quality (on the basis of A + B)(b) joint condition(c) water inflow
Rock Structure RatingRock Structure RatingParameter C: Groundwater, joint conditionParameter C: Groundwater, joint condition
RSR support estimates for a 7.3m diameterRSR support estimates for a 7.3m diametercircular tunnelcircular tunnel
(After Wickham et al. 1972)
ExamplesRSR = 622” shotcrete1” rockbolts @ 5ft centres
RSR = 305” shotcrete1” rockbolts @2.5ft centresOR 8WF31 steelsets @ 3ft centres
Geomechanics Classification orGeomechanics Classification orRock Mass Rating System (RMR) (Bieniawski 1976)Rock Mass Rating System (RMR) (Bieniawski 1976)
Based upon
• uniaxial compressive strength of rock material
• rock quality designation (RQD)
• spacing of discontinuities
• condition of discontinuities
• groundwater conditions
• orientation of discontinuities
Rock Mass Rating SystemRock Mass Rating System
• Rock mass divided into structural regions
• Each region is classified separately
• Boundaries can be rock type or structural, eg: fault
• Can be sub divided based on significant changes, eg:
discontinuity spacing
Rock Mass Rating SystemRock Mass Rating System
Rock Mass Rating SystemRock Mass Rating System
BUT: 1976 to 1989 Bienawski
• System refined by greater data
• Ratings for parameters changed
• Adapted by other workers for different situations
• PROJECT SPECIFIC SYSTEMS
Development of Rock Mass Rating SystemDevelopment of Rock Mass Rating System
Rock Mass Rating SystemRock Mass Rating System
(After Beiniawski 1989)
Guidelines for excavation and support of 10mGuidelines for excavation and support of 10mspan rock tunnels in accordance with the RMR systemspan rock tunnels in accordance with the RMR system
(After Beiniawski 1989)
Rock Tunnelling Quality Index QRock Tunnelling Quality Index Q
• Based on case histories in Scandinavia
• Numerical values on a log scale
• Range 0.001 to 1000
‘‘Q’ Classification SystemQ’ Classification System
(After Barton et al. 1974)
‘‘Q’ Classification SystemQ’ Classification System
(After Barton et al. 1974)
• represents the structure of the rockmass• crude measure of block or particle size
‘‘Q’ Classification SystemQ’ Classification System
(After Barton et al. 1974)
• represents roughness and frictional characteristics of joint walls or infill material
‘‘Q’ Classification SystemQ’ Classification System
(After Barton et al. 1974)
• consists of two stress parameters• SRF can be regarded as a total stress parameter measure of
– loosening load as excavated through shear zones– rock stress in competent rock– squeezing loads in plastic incompetent rock
• JW is a measure of water pressure
Classification of individual parameters used in Classification of individual parameters used in the Tunnelling Quality Index Qthe Tunnelling Quality Index Q
Classification of individual parameters used in Classification of individual parameters used in the Tunnelling Quality Index Q the Tunnelling Quality Index Q (cont’d)
Classification of individual parameters used in Classification of individual parameters used in the Tunnelling Quality Index Q the Tunnelling Quality Index Q (cont’d)
Q Classification SchemeQ Classification Scheme
Resolves to three parameters
• Block size ( RQD / Jn )
• Interblock shear strength ( Jr / Ja )
• Active stress ( Jw / SRF )
Q Classification SchemeQ Classification Scheme
Resolves to three parameters
• Block size ( RQD / Jn )
• Interblock shear strength ( Jr / Ja )
• Active stress ( Jw / SRF )
• Does NOT include joint orientation
Equivalent Dimension DEquivalent Dimension Dee
Estimated support categories based on the Estimated support categories based on the tunnelling quality index Qtunnelling quality index Q
Rock Mass Classification SystemRock Mass Classification System
• RMR and Q system or variants are the most widely used
• both incorporate geological, geometric and
design/engineering parameters to obtain a “value” of
rock mass quality
• empirical and require subjective assessment
Rock Mass Classification SystemRock Mass Classification System
Approach:
• accurately characterise the rockmass ie: full and
complete description of the rockmass
• assign parameters for classification later
• always use two systems for comparison
Prediction of in-situ deformation modulus EPrediction of in-situ deformation modulus Emm
from rock mass classificationsfrom rock mass classifications
Geological Strength Index (GSI)Geological Strength Index (GSI)
• Method to link the constants m and j of Hoek-Brown
failure criterion to observations in the field
ie: a possible solution to the problem of estimating
strength of jointed rockmass
• A system for estimating the reduction in rockmass
strength for different geological conditions
• Overcomes deficiencies of RMR for poor quality rock
Estimate of Geological Strength Index GSIEstimate of Geological Strength Index GSIbased on geological descriptionsbased on geological descriptions
Estimation of constants based upon rockEstimation of constants based upon rockmass structure and discontinuity surface conditionsmass structure and discontinuity surface conditions
Plots of cohesive strength and friction angles Plots of cohesive strength and friction angles for different GSI and for different GSI and mmii values values
Swan Street ShaftSwan Street Shaft
Conceptual Geological StructureConceptual Geological Structure