robin feedback for literacy plan

8/3/2019 Robin Feedback for Literacy Plan

1/3

ED 345

Literacy Plan

Feedback

Directions are followed completely and accurately _X_Yes __No (Check one)Evidence Exceeds

Criteria

Sufficient Evidence to Meet Criteria Minimal Evidence to

Meet Criteria

Areas to Further Develop

Evidence of going beyond: Criterion 1:

You begin your plan with a clearly articulated

personal philosophy about literacy teaching and

learning for children in the fourth grade

classroom.

You accurately identify and explain the

theorists/theories upon which it is based.

(Vygotsky and Constructivism)

Connections between theory and practice are

clearly evident throughout your plan, classroom

design, and reflection.

Course Goal 2; EA Conceptualization, WTS 1

Evidence: You allude to scaffolding in this

piece. Think through a little

more about how scaffolding

helps to build responsibility.

Evidence of going beyond: Criterion 2:

Your summary accurately describes the range of

reading and writing behaviors of students in a

fourth grade classroom. It reflects a solid

understanding of the appropriate use of

development continuumsto describe the range

of reading and writing behaviorsin a diverse

fourth grade classroom.

Course Goal 5;EA Conceptualization, Diagnosis;

WTS 1, 8

Evidence: Areas to Further Develop:

Would you find many Emergent

readers/writers in your fourth

grade? How about Advanced?

1


2/3

Evidence of going beyond:

You provide a detailed

chart that explains a large

number of reading andwriting

concepts/strategies

appropriate for the diverse

learners in your fourth

grade classroom. You

include instructional

strategies you would use to

teach these

concepts/strategies.

Criterion 3: a, b, c, d:

The role of the teacher clearly translates the

philosophy into specific classroom practice.

This practice demonstrates an solid

understanding of literacy practices in the

following areas:

a. AssessmentsYou provide a chart of assessments that are

appropriate for meeting the diverse needs of the

students in a fourth grade classroom.

You articulate a clear understanding of the

relationship between assessment and instruction.Course Goal 3; EA Conceptualization, Diagnosis,

WTS 1, 8

b. Concepts/Strategies:Course Goal 2, 4; EA Conceptualization, Diagnosis;

WTS 1, 8c. Instructional components:

Most of the components of literacy instruction

are accurately described and show a clear

understanding of the purpose and an

understanding of the relationship between the

role of the teacher, student and the

environment.Course Goal 1, 2, 4, 5EA Conceptualization,Diagnosis; WTS 1, 8

Evidence:

Your description of shared

reading seems more

appropriate for an early

primary classroom.

Materials and/or genre are

minimally addressed.

Areas to Further Develop:

Think about how you would

assess the quality of the

thinking on these assessments.

Think also about how you would

record the interactions duringconferences, etc.

Evidence of going beyond: Criterion 4The classroom design/floor plan supports the

philosophy and instruction described in the

written plan. You make clear connections to the

Constructivist Theory and to some of the

components of balanced literacy. You articulate

an understanding of the role the environment as

it relates to your philosophy.Course Goal 1, 6; EA Conceptualization, Diagnosis;

WTS 1, 8, 9


How does Vygotskian Theory

relate to your classroom design?

2


3/3

Evidence of going beyond: Criterion 5

The reflection/Professional Development Plan is

reflects a self-awareness of an understanding of

areas for future growth for you as a learner.

The three goals selected are supported by a

rationale based upon your class plan andclassroom design.Course Goal 6; EA Diagnosis; WTS 9


Evidence of going beyond The paper consistently addresses these L4

Criteria for Effective Writing:

Establishing and Maintaining Context

Verbal Expression

Appropriate Conventions

Purposeful Structure

Evidence:

You clearly set the context and maintained itthroughout the paper. Your paper was well

organized, included appropriate depth of support

of your ideas, and articulated the relationships

among the ideas.EA Communication; WTS 6

Evidence:

There were some

typos/spelling errors as well

as some errors in punctuation

and capitalization. There was

no evidence of citations within

the paper or a referencespage at the end.

Areas to Further Develop:

Additional Comments: Brittany, you demonstrated a solid understanding of literacy learning and teaching at this stage of your

development as a teacher. Continue to grow your understanding of the theory and how it applies to classroom practice. Remember to

edit for conventions and to cite your sources both within your paper and in a reference page at the end to clearly delineate your own

thinking from that of others. Nicely done!

Overall Performance for the Literacy Plan:

___Distinctive _X__ Proficient ___ Emerging ___ Inadequate

Name: Brittany Balash Date: May 6th, 2010 Instructor: Robin Gleason

3

robin feedback for literacy plan

Documents