robert wager vancouver island university. a billion people experience hunger and another billion...
TRANSCRIPT
A billion people experience hunger and another billion lack essential vitamins and minerals in their diet
The global population is predicted to be 9 billion by 2050
FAO 2010
The Problem
The environmental and human health benefitsfrom adopting Bt cotton have also been extensively documented.
24% increase in cotton yield per acre 50% gain in cotton profit among smallholders Triple yield from 2002 (first year of Bt
cotton)
Over 90% of all Indian cotton is Bt today
Indian Experience
Bollgard II® accounts for up to 95% of cotton planted in Australia and its adoption has resulted in a decrease of 85% in the amount of conventional insecticides used during cotton production
Australian Experience
GM Crop Adoption Reduces Pesticide Use and Environmental Impact (1996-2009)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Perc
en
tag
e c
han
ge 1
996-2
009
*Values are for biotech crop areas only, not total global cropping area – GM crops account for ~10% of total global cropping area
Source: Brookes and Barfoot (2011) GM Crops: Global Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts 1996-2009. PG Economics, Dorchester UK
20091996
8.7% 17.1%
17 million farmers
15 are in Developing
World Grow 400 Million acres
Developing world
Grows 52% of All GE crops
20 of 28 countries that
Grow GE crops in
Developing World
grows 52%
17million farmers of which 15 are in developing world
52% of all GM crops grown in developing world
20/28 countries are in developing world
PRSV still can cause severe damage
2011: Transgenic papaya about 85% of production
NonTransgenic
Transgenic
“The WHO, the AMA, the U.S. NAS, the British Royal Society, and every other respected organization that has examined the evidence has come to the same conclusion:
Consuming foods containing ingredients derived from GM crops is no riskier than consuming the same foods containing ingredients from crop plants modified by conventional plant improvement techniques.”
(AAAS 2012)
Global Scientific Opinion
Controversies about the impact of genetically modified (GM) crops have
too often been based on
contested science
EASAC 2013
“The reported work from the Rowett is flawed in many aspects of design, execution and analysis and that no conclusions should be drawn from it.”
“Found no convincing evidence of adverse effects from GM potatoes.”
Royal Society Rebuke of Pusztai1999 GM potato paper
Health Canada Canadian Food Inspection Agency European Food Safety Authority Food Standards Australia New Zealand German Federal Institute of Risk Assessment German Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food safety France- ANSES (Agency for Food, Environmental, and Occupational Health and Safety) France- HCB (High Counsel for Biotechnology)- Six Academies of Science (France) Denmark- DTU National Food Institute Netherlands- Bureau for Risk Assessment (Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority) Brazil- CTNBio (Brazilian National Technical Commission on Biosafety)- Belgium- BAC (Biotechnology Advisory Council) Romania (Food Safety Authority) Belgium- VIB (Life Sciences Institute) French Society of Toxicological Pathologists (SFPT) European Federation of Biotechnology AFBV (French Association for Biotechnology Vegetables) ABNE (African Biosafety Network of Expertise) ACB (African Center for Biosafety) European Society of Toxicological Pathology
Partial List of World Food Safety Authorities that are critical
about Seralini et al 2012
Fig. 1. Mortality of rats fed GMO treated or not with Roundup. Rats were fed with NK603 GM maize at three different doses (11, 22, 33% in their diet: thin, medium and bold lines, respectively) compared to the substantially equivalent closest isogenic non-GM maize (control, dotted line). Lifespan during the experiment for the control group is represented by the vertical bar ± SEM (grey area). In bar histograms, the causes of mortality before the grey area are detailed in comparison to the controls (0). In black are represented the necessary euthanasia because of suffering in accordance with ethical rules (tumors over 25% body weight, more than 25% weight loss, hemorrhagic bleeding, etc.); and in hatched areas, spontaneous mortality.
Diet with maize (transgenic vs. conventional isogenic)
In some cases high doses seems to be protecting. In other cases, they are less harmful than lower doses!
Control group
Swiss NSF (2012), reviewing more than 2000 studies,
No health or environmental risks
Italian Study (2013) reviewed 1783 studies
No health or environmental risks
European Research
There is no validated evidence that GM crops
have greater adverse impact on health and the
environment than any other technology used in
plant breeding.
EASAC 2013
European National Academies of Science (2013)
17 years, >3,000,000,000,000 meals containing ingredients from GE crops
Zero documented cases of harm
Safety Record
Countries not Corporations
Brazil, China and India
Over 70 countries have active Biotechnology R&D programs
The next “Big” players
Micro-nutrient enhanced Iron, Zinc, Vitamin A
Fungal resistance-wheat, potato, banana
Viral resistance-many crops Bacterial resistance-banana, grapes, orange
Enhanced Nitrogen efficiency
Drought tolerance Salt tolerance Frost tolerance
Pharma crops
The Next Generation of GE Crops
Micro-nutrient enhanced Iron, Zinc, Vitamin A
Fungal resistance-wheat, potato, banana Viral resistance-many crops Bacterial resistance-banana, grapes, orange
Enhanced Nitrogen efficiency
Drought tolerance Salt tolerance Frost tolerance
Pharma crops
The Next Generation of GE Crops
“There is compelling evidence that GM crops
can contribute to sustainable development
goals with benefits to farmers, consumers, the
environment and the economy.”
EASAC 2013
European National Academies of Science (2013)