robert merrick - herbert smith freehills

18

Click here to load reader

Upload: informa-australia

Post on 16-Apr-2017

144 views

Category:

Business


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Robert Merrick - Herbert Smith Freehills

Rob Merrick, Head of Global Energy Group, Partner, +61 8 9211 7683, [email protected]

14 SEPTEMBER 2016

SEAAOC 2016

OUTLOOK FOR AUSTRALIAN OIL & GAS M&A

Page 2: Robert Merrick - Herbert Smith Freehills

2

OIL PRICE FALL = M&A RISE?

Conditions ripe

for M&A?

Page 3: Robert Merrick - Herbert Smith Freehills

3

UPTICK IN M&A?

After the Meltdown, an

era of opportunity for

mergers and acquisitions

The Australian, September 2008

Rich pickings on

horizon for oil and gas

Sydney Morning Herald,

November 2008

Low oil prices may

spark a frenzy of Australian

oil and gas acquisitions

Business Insider Australia,

December 2014

Oil price slide sets the

stage for M&A

Financial Times, September 2014

Oil slump spurs wave

of merger deals around the

world

The Australian, December 2014

Page 4: Robert Merrick - Herbert Smith Freehills

4

BUT THE REALITY HAS BEEN QUITE DIFFERENT…

Australia – Number of deals

8

7

5

6

12

13

11

6

9

6

8

66

15

10

9

12

11

6

10

8

11 11

6

10

7

6

9

12

13

4

9

13 13

6

3

12

6 6

21

16

17

12

7

8

12

4

0

5

10

15

20

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Source: Capital IQ

Page 5: Robert Merrick - Herbert Smith Freehills

5

Asia Pacific – Number of deals

24

20

26

23

20

33

27

30 30

26

22

1010

34

28

33

24

33

18

27 27

22

26

17

26

16 16

35

33

41

24

2122

31

18

6

37

2423

40

42

36

34

27

38

21

10

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Source: Capital IQ

Page 6: Robert Merrick - Herbert Smith Freehills

6

WHY HAVE WE NOT SEEN AS MANY DEALS AS EXPECTED?

Oil price volatility and unpredictability

??

Page 7: Robert Merrick - Herbert Smith Freehills

7

WHY HAVE WE NOT SEEN AS MANY DEALS AS EXPECTED?

We are not an as attractive destination as elsewhere …

Source: Beyond Borders: The Future of Deal-Making

Herbert Smith Freehills 2016

http://www.hsfbeyondborders.com/

Page 8: Robert Merrick - Herbert Smith Freehills

8

What sellers are offering…(stressed, cost-saving, portfolio rationalisation)

• mid-to-late life production assets with

near-term capex or decommissioning

exposures, or

• gas development opportunities without

a settled development plan /

commercialisation pathway, or

• exploration

What buyers want…(cash-rich independents, private equity / capital, hedge

funds)

• spend of US$250m – US$1b, and

• production, and

• preferably oil, and

• no near-term capex or

decommissioning, and

• exploration upside

WHY HAVE WE NOT SEEN AS MANY DEALS AS EXPECTED?

Page 9: Robert Merrick - Herbert Smith Freehills

9

SO WHAT IS THE OUTLOOK?

At the risk of sounding like a broken record, conditions are still ripe for

upstream M&A:

• forward curve is stabilising

• asset write-downs are being booked

Page 10: Robert Merrick - Herbert Smith Freehills

10

STRUCTURING, VALUATION AND RISK ALLOCATION INFLUENCERS – PACKAGE DEALS

• Exit of entire portfolios – take the good with the bad

• Some restructuring may be required to prepare the package for sale

• Need to manage pre-emption risks on individual assets within the

package (price allocation)

Page 11: Robert Merrick - Herbert Smith Freehills

11

STRUCTURING, VALUATION AND RISK ALLOCATION INFLUENCERS – PRE-EMPTION

• Buyers have little appetite for pre-emption

• Sellers must:

- avoid e.g. Texas two-step, economic interests, holdco sales; or

- minimise risk e.g. waivers, avoid disputes

Page 12: Robert Merrick - Herbert Smith Freehills

12

STRUCTURING, VALUATION AND RISK ALLOCATION INFLUENCERS – VALUE BRIDGING

• Sellers want premium to forward curve whereas Buyers want to pay

towards the lower end of the curve

• Valuation gaps bridged by:

- contingent payments

- ORRs

- warranty protection and purchase price retention

- risk sharing (some creative!)

Page 13: Robert Merrick - Herbert Smith Freehills

13

STRUCTURING, VALUATION AND RISK ALLOCATION INFLUENCERS – DECOMMISSIONING

Greater focus on exposure and impact on valuation

Starting point is that all structures, equipment and property must be removed

+

significant expense arising at an uncertain point in time

+

refundable PRRT credit capped at PRRT paid by actual tax payer

+

smaller, less financially robust players attracted to these types of assets

need to find solutions share risk

massive problem

Page 14: Robert Merrick - Herbert Smith Freehills

14

DECOMMISSIONING - RATCHET MECHANISM EXAMPLE

• Ratchet:

- Buyer responsible for first slice of decommissioning costs relating to the transferred

interest

- The next slice borne by Seller (70%) and Buyer (30%)

- Any other decommissioning costs and any other losses relating to decommissioning

borne by the Buyer

• Cash call mechanism: Once threshold decommissioning expenditure has been reached

(requiring Seller contribution), Buyer can cash call Seller for contribution to

decommissioning invoices. Back to back cash calls with JOA with supporting evidence to

be provided to the Seller and paid either directly to the Operator or to the Buyer

• Seller Contribution to decommissioning security: Seller support to decommissioning

security agreements by posting security on behalf of Buyer covering Seller’s expected

contribution to decommissioning costs.

• Transfer rights: Rights are transferable to acquirer of the licence interests

• Buyer default: Exclusion of liability in case of Buyer default under the agreement

Page 15: Robert Merrick - Herbert Smith Freehills

15

STRUCTURING, VALUATION AND RISK ALLOCATION INFLUENCERS – CONSENTS

• Regulators and co-venturers focussing on:

- technical capability orderly transition of operatorship

- financial capability security

Page 16: Robert Merrick - Herbert Smith Freehills

16

The contents of this publication, current at the date of publication set out in this document, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should

not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action based on this publication.

Herbert Smith Freehills LLP and its affiliated and subsidiary businesses and firms and Herbert Smith Freehills, an Australian Partnership, are separate member firms of the

international legal practice known as Herbert Smith Freehills.

© Herbert Smith Freehills 2016

DISCLAIMER

Page 17: Robert Merrick - Herbert Smith Freehills
Page 18: Robert Merrick - Herbert Smith Freehills