roaci abhi draft 090414 - github pagespatilnabhi.github.io/portfolio/assets/docs/bombardier.pdfmodel...
TRANSCRIPT
-
FEASIMULATION
• ModelSpecifications
• Abaqus Modelling
• TypesofModels
• AnalysisofFEAResults
1
-
MODELSPECIFICATIONS
254X100
2
-
MODELSPECIFICATIONS(CONTD.)
Dimensions
3
-
MODELSPECIFICATIONS(CONTD.)
Materials
1. Plies– Kevlar49/Epoxy(102,103,
105,106)
2. Core– NomexHoneycomb(104)
(AramidFibre,PhenolicCoated)
3. Cohesive(0.001mmlayers)
4
-
MODELSPECIFICATIONS(CONTD.)Plies- Kevlar49/epoxy
Elastic(MPa)
E1 E2 E3 Nu12 Nu13 Nu23 G12 G13 G23
76000 5500 5500 0.34 0.34 0.4 2300 2300 1800
Hashin Damage(MPa)
Longitudinal TensileStrength
LongitudinalCompressiveStrength
TransverseTensileStrength
TransverseCompressiveStrength
Longitudinal ShearStrength
TransverseShearStrength
1400 235 12 53 34 34
DamageEvolution(kN)
Longitudinal TensileFractureEnergy
Longitudinal CompressiveFractureEnergy
TransverseTensileFractureEnergy
TransverseCompressiveFractureEnergy
117.8 52.8 0.3 0.8
• Continuum ShellElement
MaterialProperties
5
-
MODELSPECIFICATIONS(CONTD.)Core– Nomex Honeycomb (AramidFibre,PhenolicCoated)
Elastic(MPa)
E1 E2 E3 Nu12 Nu13 Nu23 G12 G13 G23
0.1 0.1 60 0 0 0 0.1 25 17
• Solid (3DStress),Homogeneous Element
MaterialProperties
6
-
MODELSPECIFICATIONS(CONTD.)
CohesiveBehavior (MPa)
Knn Kss Ktt
1,000,000 800,000 800,000
QuadsDamage(MPa)
NominalStressNormal-onlymode NominalStressFirstDirection NominalStressSecondDirection
30 60 60
DamageEvolution(kN)(PowerBK=1)
NormalModeFractureEnergy ShearModeFractureEnergyFirstDirectionShearModeFractureEnergySecond
Direction
0.2 0.8 0.8
Cohesive
• CohesiveElement
MaterialProperties
7
-
ABAQUSMODELLING
• 7 Modules:
1. Part
2. Property
3. Assembly
4. Step
5. Load
6. Mesh
7. Job
8
-
ABAQUSMODELLING(CONTD.)1.PART
Partitions
9
-
ABAQUSMODELLING(CONTD.)2.PROPERTY&ASSEMBLY
10
-
ABAQUSMODELLING(CONTD.)3.STEP&LOAD
Supports(200mmapart)
3-PointBending
11
-
ABAQUSMODELLING(CONTD.)3.STEP&LOAD
12
Modelledasa‘half’symmetricmodeltosimplifycomputationandresultsanalysis
-
ABAQUSMODELLING(CONTD.)4.MESH
13
-
TYPESOFMODELS
1. Unrepaired(Undamaged)
2. CircularStep-Sanded
3. CircularTaper-Sanded
4. RectangularStep-Sanded
A. 102and103
B. 102,103,&104
14
-
TYPESOFMODELS(CONTD.)1.UNREPAIRED
Dimensions:200mmx50mm
Plies:0.254mmthick
Core:9.525mmthick
CohesiveElement:0.001mmthick
15
-
TYPESOFMODELS(CONTD.)2.CIRCULARSCARFED
CircularStep-Sanded CircularTaper-Sanded
16
CircularPatch(102):R25.4mm
-
TYPESOFMODELS(CONTD.)3.RECTANGULARSCARFED
17
-
ANALYSISOFRESULTS18
-
ANALYSISOFRESULTS19
• Reactionforceattheloadingnodesü PlotofForcevs.Displacement
ü Damageon1st ply(102)
• Maximumforceforvariousmodelscompared
• Otherresultsstudied:ü Stressesanddamagepatternsonplies,patches,
cohesiveelementsandhoneycombcore
-
ANALYSISOFRESULTS(CONTD.)20
1.UNREPAIREDMODEL
-
ANALYSISOFRESULTS(CONTD.)21
605N
1.UNREPAIREDMODEL
-
ANALYSISOFRESULTS(CONTD.)22
2.CIRCULARSCARFEDMODEL
-
ANALYSISOFRESULTS(CONTD.)23
610N
2.CIRCULARSCARFEDMODEL
-
ANALYSISOFRESULTS(CONTD.)24
3.RECTANGULARSCARFEDMODEL
-
ANALYSISOFRESULTS(CONTD.)25
548N
3.RECTANGULARSCARFEDMODEL
-
ANALYSISOFRESULTS(CONTD.)26
SUMMARY
MAXIMUMLOAD(kN)
UndamagedPanel RepairedPanel(CircularScarfed)RepairedPanel
(RectangularScarfed)
0.605 0.610 0.548
-
CONCLUSION
ü Theoptimumrepairmethodandparametersweredeterminedandvalidated
ü SimulatevariousmodelsusingFEAtodeterminetheoptimummodelandparametersforthechosenrepairmethod– [scarfrepair](NUS&PKU)
ü Theoptimumrepairmethodwasvalidated(foritsmechanicalperformance)byfabricatingthemodelandconducting3-pointbendingtest(UofT )
27