rmb mini project (2)final
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
1/48
STUDY ON STUDENTS PREFERENCE
TOWARDS VARIOUS MOBILESERVICE PROVIDERS WITH SPECIALREFERENCE TO COIMBATORE
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
2/48
INTRODUCTION Initially Department of Telecommunications
(DoT) was the only monopoly operator in thecountry.
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India was set upin 1997 and in 1999 National Telecom Policy wasannounced.
Indian mobile market is one of the fastest growing
markets and is forecasted to reach 868.47 millionusers by 2013.
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
3/48
MOBILE SERVICE PROVIDERS Bharti Airtel Limited (Bharti), Reliance Communications Limited (Reliance), Vodafone Essar Limited (Vodafone), Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL)-state owned, Tata Teleservices Limited (Tata), Idea Cellular Limited (IDEA),
Aircel Limited (Aircel), Unitech Wireless Limited (Unitech), Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL), Sistema Shyam TeleServices Limited (Sistema), Loop Mobile (India) Limited - Formerly BPL Mobile (Loop
Mobile), Videocon Telecommunications Limited (Videocon), S Tel Private Limited (S Tel), Himachal Futuristic Communications Limited (HFCL) and
Etisalat DB Telecom Private Limited (Etisalat).
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
4/48
NEED AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY Many new competitors have entered the market
with new attractive schemes, providing additionalfacilities, adding new features to existing ones.This study would help the service providers toidentify the facility to be provided to attract
customers. The scope is limited to Coimbatore. The major service provider considered for the
study are Bharti Airtel Limited (Bharti), Reliance
Communications Limited (Reliance),VodafoneEssar Limited (Vodafone), Bharat Sanchar NigamLimited (BSNL)-state owned, Tata TeleservicesLimited (Tata), Aircel Limited (Aircel).
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
5/48
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY To know about the awareness level of students
regarding their mobile service provider. To ascertain the attributes that students prefers in
selecting a particular mobile phone service provider.
To study the students satisfaction level towards
various services offered by mobile phone serviceproviders.
To assess the problems faced by the mobile phoneusers regarding their respective mobile phone serviceproviders.
To know which advertisement media puts moreimpact on the buying decision of students.
To understand and offer valuable suggestions toimprove the services of mobile phone service
providers.
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
6/48
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY The area of study confined to Coimbatore.
The sample size for the study is 50 samples Random samples were taken and research was
done based on convenience sampling
The data, which is collected Primary Source: The data has been collected
directly from respondent with the help ofstructured questionnaires.
Secondary Source: The secondary data wascollected from internet
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
7/48
LIMITATION OF THE STUDY The sample size of the study is limited to 50
respondents which are not based on anyscientific method for determining thesample size.
Geographical area of this study is confinedto Coimbatore District only.
The scope of the study was limited
Most of the responses were collected fromfemale and so the output are biased.
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
8/48
Statistical tools used: Percentage analysis
Friedman test
ANOVA
Correlation
Chi-square
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
9/48
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
10/48
Frequency Percent ValidPercent CumulativePercentValid male 18 36.0 36.0 36.0
female 32 64.0 64.0 100.0Total 50 100.0 100.0
TABLE SHOWING THE GENDER OF
THE RESPONDENTSGender
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
11/48
INTERPRETATION:It is clear from the above table that out of total
respondents taken for the study 36.0% of the
respondents are male and 64.0% of therespondents are female.
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
12/48
CHART SHOWING THE GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
13/48
Age
TABLE SHOWING THE AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentValid 18-21 30 60.0 60.0 60.0
22-25 20 40.0 40.0 100.0Total 50 100.0 100.0
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
14/48
Interpretation:It is inferred from the above table that out of thetotal respondent taken for the study , 60.0% of the
respondents fall under the category age of 18-21
years,40.0% of the respondents fall under the
category age of 22-25 years.
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
15/48
CHART SHOWING THE AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
16/48
Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative
PercentValid prepaid 41 82.0 82.0 82.0
postpaid 8 16.0 16.0 98.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0
Services
TABLE SHOWING THE SERVICE PREFERRED BY THERESPONDENTS
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
17/48
Interpretation:From the above table it is inferred that 82.0% of
the respondents use prepaid service and 16.0% of the
respondents use postpaid services.
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
18/48
CHART SHOWING THE SERVICE PREFERRED BY THERESPONDENTS
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
19/48
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulative
PercentValid airtel 30 60.0 60.0 60.0
vodafone 6 12.0 12.0 72.0bsnl 7 14.0 14.0 86.0
aircel 5 10.0 10.0 96.0reliance 1 2.0 2.0 98.0
tata docomo
1
2.0
2.0
100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0
Current Connection
Table showing the current connection used by therespondents
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
20/48
Interpretation:It is inferred from the above table that 60% of the
respondents use airtel, 12 % of the respondents use
Vodafone, 14% of the respondents use Bsnl, 10 % of the
respondents use aircel, and 2% of the respondents usereliance and tata docomo.
So it is concluded that majority of the respondents
are using Airtel
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
21/48
Chart showing the current connection used by therespondents
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
22/48
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativ
e PercentValid TV 38 76.0 76.0 76.0
Magazine 2 4.0 4.0 80.0Newspaper 4 8.0 8.0 88.0
Internet 6 12.0 12.0 100.0Total 50 100.0 100.0
Advertisement Impact
Table showing the advertisement impact of therespondents
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
23/48
Interpretation:Nearly 76 % of the respondents are attracted by
advertisements in TV, 4 % by magazines, 8% by
newspapers and 12% by internet.It is concluded that advertisement media that
puts more impact on the buying decision of students is
TV.
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
24/48
Table showing the advertisement impact of therespondents
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
25/48
Frequency Percent ValidPercent CumulativePercentValid yes 12 24.0 24.0 24.0
no 38 76.0 76.0 100.0Total 50 100.0 100.0
Satisfied Services
Table showing the satisfaction level of respondents
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
26/48
Interpretation :From the above table it is found that 76% of the
customers of various networks are not satisfied with their
service providers and only 24 % are satisfied.
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
27/48
Table showing the satisfaction level of respondents
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
28/48
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativ
e PercentValid coverage 23 46.0 46.0 46.0
call charges 18 36.0 36.0 82.0roaming facility 3 6.0 6.0 88.0
value added services 6 12.0 12.0 100.0Total 50 100.0 100.0
Facility Attracts
Table showing the facility that attracts the respondents
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
29/48
Interpretation:From the above table it is found that 46% of the
respondents are attracted by the coverage facility, 36% by
call charges facility , 6% of the respondents are attracted by
roaming facility and 12% by value added services.It is found that most of the respondents are attracted by
coverage facility.
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
30/48
Chart showing the facility that attracts the respondents
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
31/48
TABLE SHOWING THE ASSOCIATION BETWEENGENDER AND MONTHLY EXPENSES OF THERESPONDENTS ON MOBILE SERVICESCross tab:
monthly expenses Total
less
than 150 150-350 350-500
above
500 less than 150
gender male10 6 2 0 18
female
12 12 3 5 32
Total22 18 5 5 50
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
32/48
Interpretation:It is inferred from the above table that 22
respondents spend less than 150 out of which age 10
respondents are male and 12 respondents are female. 18respondents spend 150-350 out of which 6 are male and
12 are female, 5 respondents spend 350-500 out of which
2 are male and 3 are female. And 5 respondents spend
above 500 out of which majority are female.
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
33/48
Friedman Test
N50
Chi-Square40.669
df3
Asymp. Sig..000
Test Statistics(a)
Table showing the Rank of the factors that influence therespondents to use their service provider:
Mean Rankprice 2.79
network services 3.10brand image 2.56
value added service 1.55
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
34/48
Interpretation:From the above Friedman test it has been
found that value added service is the important factor that
influence the respondents to use the service provider as the
mean is found for the value added service is 1.55. the 2nd
factor is brand image and its mean is 2.56. Price is the3rd
factor as the mean is 2.76 and mean for network services
is high 3.10.
As the significance level is less than 0.05 , so the
value added service is most influencing factor.
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
35/48
Test Statistics(a)
FriedmanTestMean Rank
Sms pack 2.72concession call 2.74internet services 1.86
full talk time 2.67N
49Chi-Square 16.313
df 3Asymp. Sig. .001
Table showing the ranks for the value added service thatattracts the respondents
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
36/48
InterpretationFrom the above Friedman test it has been found that
internet services is the important factor that influence the
respondents to use the service provider as the mean is found
for the internet service is 1.86. The 2
nd
factor full talk time andits mean is 2.67. Sms pack is the3rd factor as the mean is 2.72
and mean for concession call is high 2.4
As the significance level is less than 0.05, the rank have
impact on preferences and so the internet value added service
is most influencing factor.
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
37/48
Friedman Test
Mean Rankbilling related 2.42
activate/deactivate3.00
info VAS's 2.35
network problem 2.23N
50Chi-Square
10.596df
3Asymp. Sig.
.014
Test Statistics(a)
Table showing the ranks of problems faced by therespondents with customer care service
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
38/48
Interpretation:From the above Friedman test it has been found that
network problem is the problem faced by the respondentsdue to which they have to contact customer care service
provider regularly as the mean is least for it (2.23) the 2nd
problem faced is information about VASs as its mean is
2.35. Billing related is the3rd problem as the mean is 2.42
and mean for network services is high 3.00.
As the significance level is greater than 0.05 , the
ranks have no high significant difference. And it is found
that most of the respondents face network problem.
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
39/48
Correlationsconnectivity satisfaction serive awarness
connectivity Pearson Correlation 1 -.123 -.102 -.062Sig. (2-tailed) .396 .480 .671
N 50 50 50 50satisfaction Pearson Correlation -.123 1 .074 .267
Sig. (2-tailed) .396 .609 .061N 50 50 50 50
serive Pearson Correlation -.102 .074 1 .105Sig. (2-tailed) .480 .609 .466
N 50 50 50 50awarness Pearson Correlation -.062 .267 .105 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .671 .061 .466N 50 50 50 50
Table showing the correlation between factors likeconnectivity, satisfaction, service, awareness
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
40/48
Interpretation:From the above table it is inferred that factors such asconnectivity, satisfaction, service and awareness are not
correlated with each other and there is no association
between them.
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
41/48
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.connectivity Between Groups .480 1 .480 2.131 .151
Within Groups
10.811
48
.225
Total 11.291 49satisfaction Between Groups .171 1 .171 1.922 .172
Within Groups 4.275 48 .089Total 4.447 49
service
Between Groups
.593
1
.593
2.356
.131
Within Groups 12.074 48 .252Total 12.667 49
awarness Between Groups .005 1 .005 .029 .867Within Groups 8.076 48 .168
Total8.081
49
One way ANOVA
Table showing the association between Age and connectivity, ageand satisfaction, age and service, age and awareness
h i i i b d i i
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
42/48
Null Hypothesis: There is no association between age and connectivity,age and satisfaction, age and service, age and awareness
Alternative Hypothesis: There is association between age andconnectivity, age and satisfaction, age and service, age and awareness
Interpretation:It is inferred from the above table that the calculated value for
connectivity (p=.151), satisfaction (p=.172), service (p=.131), awareness
(p=.867) has no association with age, as the there is no significant
difference i.e. less than 0.05, therefore we have to accept the nullhypothesis as there is no significant difference and similarity between
the gender age and connectivity, age and satisfaction, age and service,
age and awareness.
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
43/48
TABLE SHOWING THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN AGEGROUP AND PURPOSE OF USAGE BY THE RESPONDENTS
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
4.218(a) 3 .239
Likelihood Ratio 4.892 3 .180
Linear-by-Linear
Association.242 1 .623
N of Valid Cases 50
purpose of use Total
incomin
g calls
out
going
calls
sms
messagi
ng internet incoming calls
age 18-21 11 6 13 0 30
22-25 6 6 6 2 20
Total 17 12 19 2 50
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
44/48
Interpretation:Null Hypothesis: There is no association between age group
and purpose of usage of mobile service by the respondents.
Alternative Hypothesis: There is association between agegroup and purpose of usage of mobile service by the
respondents
From the above table it is shown that the Pearson chi
square significance value(p=0.239) which is more than
0.05) therefore we accept the null hypothesis (there is no
association between the age group and number of mobile
phone used by the respondents).
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
45/48
FINDINGS: Few years back mobile connections were not common among
the students. But with the mobile revolution now we can find
almost every student with mobile phone. Most of the students prefer prepaid connections than
postpaid connections.
Most preferred cellular company amongst the students isairtel and the least preferred company is reliance.
Mostly the students are dissatisfied with the services providedby the different mobile service provider.
Maximum number of respondents was attracted towards thecoverage facility and the least like the roaming services.
T.V. and internet are the best media advertisements that putmore impact on the students buying decisions.
M thl f f l hi h th l th
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
46/48
Monthly expenses of female are higher than male on themobile services which is derived through cross tabulation.
From the Friedmans test it has been found that value added
services like Internet are most influencing factor for studentsto have particular service provider. And the problem for whichthey need to contact customer care is network facility as itranked at 1st position.
In anova its inferred that there is no significant difference andthus there is no association between the gender age andconnectivity, age and satisfaction, age and service, age andawareness.
In chi-square it is inferred that there is no association betweenage group and purpose of usage of mobile service by therespondents.
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
47/48
CONCLUSION Study attempts to find out the satisfaction of
consumer regarding cell phone service providers.
Quality of service and the ability to attract and retain
customers dictate the success or failure of next-
generation communications service providers
There should be constant innovation by adding new
additional features since customers are looking for new
features from the mobile service provider.
-
8/2/2019 RMB Mini Project (2)Final
48/48
Thank you