__ IN THE SOPREME (A>RT OF FLORIDA

CSREGORY ANDREWS,

Pe+;Monec,

v. CAS6 Nod %N - 'O*j

STATE OF FLORINA, L1 CAs£ Mo.'. 1 O t% - 355

R%Mar*, 1S- 99%- S

PETITIoME.R's 3tJRISDICX10MAt. BRT E F >

Flocíh.

. TA%E OF COWrsyn

s.n a n

o cmi_.Sweement & - 3

Oesh

�042D

TABL.E_ ..0F C.ITATT,.ON5

___ C.ASE6 _____ _.________ ____.._.._.__..________ PMcE(fd ___

hacihalux,heds,.3191.3dLES2712Q3_.(_E�060ßSÓ)_,_,_._-......._.,_. . .

(erec A, C¬cl\ v. i4-etov-cv - C orp., 9% 0.h, 3%½3 MOS,

iin S&r 9997, Ho i Fe), M 359 ( \990) , .. . . .

___.. .._Eitz.pcAdiksh,3dD_h,2A_331,SiM-)E1EA206d. ....._...._......_. ..-..~____£ . . _

Fev.,ler v. SwAe, 492 Sci ad 13½½, 1347 (Fh. tw 1×At9sO . . ,, , . , . 6

L½mton v. Sw,4c, %3 ½3d e 373 . , .. . . . . . . . ,, . .

_haes_v., _ _MO %.S uct 9, u% ( F�060htA8hù 9

1..r:x..¾rocer v, hte, 5%S So. M 67 ( Fla, 9A pcA t% U 9

oc.h v. ½+e, 293 so.96 Ms, 45 (A \M4). . . . . . . , . , , . 9

W DAe v, See , ©o sac) Sta (Fk. am7) . . . .

ve\ v. Sk# , m % 3c) 433, %36 (.Fk. tw DcAc700Ò . . . . . . . . 7

ihr in v, %+e , VAO so.M 79'A, 203 ( F�060©©cÚ . . , , , . . . . 9

v«w v. ww,., in se.3d ns ( Fw.94 ¼^aore . . . . . . . Q7/9

w,w v, i c.,n, c9 se.M is? ( Fh, 198Ú , , , ., , . ., , . , , s 9

3×ae v. wn,c., sn se. aa u.9, n i c ea. sc» oce t½ss). . , . 7

ar..BE1LailT.HORITI45

A,-+, V , § 36%È F\ocick Cons%Aton , , , , , , , . ,,

n § o

TAT5 MSNT OF THE Laf4 Mnu 0F THE FACTS

. n . n n .. .. n.. n a . .,- = =�442" "

ocmciion_uáth_carnm ..c.chnodh:d._oc .le-,5c.iñoas3.4.cxhoA# .io.. . .

c,+;no 4 �060÷,nsoo. ow ( )( cò ed (O ef the F\c., ½.¥. ( W, 1., 9- 9, O

Tesed cecnme.n(_ed on.3e.noa..cq lb, Dol3 \dherein, cr¥ &c{cd the_ ¢stede

cA½d three_ oa;+ne.sses, * OEtteer Leveänn, 3.M., c,nc) Dwn W\\:c.ms (WLD,

9, 72-m). A+ ¥ke c.enchwan ef the Sche½ crise.-in-dnieß, ¥ke- clebrse . .

mcued b c,. men4 e +kd ha..M on insMáenc.q c ev{o ence

(v..2, R, tan Twe. Tcw ceoc+ denced %ewen (va, a, n. i2sl The pcq

cetvcne.Ô o, verd4+ nh n 9e¥i&íonef uw goilt3 oC \erncI oc 45dvior S

e enduc.A (No\. 1, R. 44| ; WL 2 , R 162).

A sen%erv-;cv scoce_shek icdict.ae a permisúbe. an¥encl er e. noen

29.~1 cnncWhs çicken op ¥0 \S ge.ccs (N/o\, Q, R. ½A-½Ù. The Ten-.\ C_coc¥ oc ocke.caec

Pe Nener Acdee o cf 6M er (exsùvieos cordoch en ei pesen order &he

or 6m o e e n o en¥ene eÑ h!cn ¥0 eree c.c5

n e. Pc nn (.Ve . 3. R. R. in-145\ The Tch\ C ncA«d

.._ �254C.4 14e.02- _hicil;t_Digitick_hd___6 pranh Pdeo

..__._Ce_ 10 C_O-...0û__Febcoca.p,Ro44_th +M huonc£ .cE n_wrinen

_._._. _. ____C G560.._ .....¾ML__ fi!L 2.._ _,....Q5È .k43di$,_M. . ___.SLO,1..r- -

.. _..__.____ _...Ors_t ca.hA_003R. PeAlfsonel_Meesos.FIMA .Mut-_d_.Appec

....__ M2. Åth RA_A _ sd�254,_O r M refleuph (*AMyde t

__ . __QeØ..c.6&�254,Etcs±ENÄ .he.-CAhcy..rLr _s ASE .._. . ... __._ ._..___ . ...__.. ___._. .

.TO9150%ÇTToepp WrATEMENT

. MADcidA. MMLvW.. _(,o.d hc..S..dlu..re¹r Ii_sdEchiCCL__to_f�254d£fA_

r- e 5 on_d.ADMc t r± M¼LM_ cnSS ctLCk S._

.____CO_fb9-. _ 56tO_ 90 _. Art Á_3CbMRoci_h._Constito±O , . . . . .... .

. R. Ap.E weammxaxe&L

awweb�060ç>remehAo ks àac.cesco ¿«isdMen w aview

o._clessie.o2.±he est Disód_ C.r.o.>rt .oß_AppecL%t_expee.ss4 oncl_Acec

AoAds with c3.Aedsic>n pee.dou cenchecec) the- Rest D:stcic.* f....o t of

..b_ppmed m3be... sosoe._point. oE \ca.»Mthoot ..expressh rec_ech Accrn.itî___

ceaicos recderec deúsiom in h ce preceder*, g>cec.e.chnt

sur4t4ARY of THE AR90MENT

Twe bst ots*tc_t 6ct cf Appeds cAsseci its chece+tm thqw mk n

n_ac_ce_uswhentM_tbtr.çpur.obwLhd_ti±uAse_cMmW

ecconecos c>sse5stment ef the «Nic)enc.EL. The- He2vechale_ AççehedeL 1.s Ren½n

n en½ons e# Apw.nt Anc�060sow,.ca nn e-pa, sowsw�254ea,ed oc

c. ca sms%ucJ evicienes ,.ms peamråecà est +c(cd ;n ahtc.½ +e chø em

nkerence of in¥e.nt the,,cef hi\e opining contmcq to e,wM estcJn her

scáv+ectea y,c, o si+es c.cA ecq cuerwons thcá expcess\3 c.,n)

ce_c,,,t\3 e,.onk\idh r dth EloMc)cA Weet et µecede.nt) other hte c

ces cf Approt ç>cececlecit, reel the- ç'cest Ocstew ¼.x-+ d OppecA% own

pcecede.nt on th!L ¼me- pnint% cd \e.,s,.a çÇAccAb\e, ½ the obwe-- siglec

c.nut,©,

The, hhie.. 3 e. Be.nton's e9(nice coc> \ec.*s cáth %tute>rted

to ive- ce_c.cxt3 ¥ec.nscépt ncJ ce.Ferenc.e.s ppeem ws op nion, c cJ

here $cá\ed ±n_cçç\q._oude, ocwn _readea_in chích±b 2e,te.cmine H,e

Tcht£ouch_duse._c c c ce.6eo_oo:1_c.ommiMA_sorce. p

. eJ113 +e ceceApssenne. eut£1eom peesentecbA Mc c

. . . pp\isAMe le_as he.ceho._______.__ ....______

MkV..MENT

THE_APPSik AT_E. CooBT_ERitE_CLIRDEBLVIMr___ .

. _AEEEL.LANI_A_MORE½ts_RELIEEQM_DIREAT ___..___.

APPEAL MID REMDERIW,- TTS OprNION

____ _COMT_R_6M_.TQ£6T_A_EXWED pgEcEDEAEA5__

_ _ __.A.R_EMkl._OEAEELYI_Mfr.AM ERROK_Ecos ___ _

STANDhRD (f REVI6W

h_ Flec4Alpame. C .±as_cdcecA eAir.hushed pper revie.,a e h .

.._..... .At.csadkr.1_cE ceir.iew_.dA±tís14ouri'5_exidentor4.

nunegs is chse- e£ c¼cceenn. Rtr ec.+de.w y, spg 9co

teA, M.wyee, wy +we- cote.s cf evidence., hhnven,

%3 h�060iok ME, c>�523l6¡ the pcInc.içûes ed ste.ce- ch. s L

CE Qgvi¼ç.-ch vi f.nmhe-ch; 3$9 So,9d M9 laOS(Fle

ch cet½nj{'+5 cAn s \wd on e ecconeco e.w

cf twet w or dn c e»ew eccenecos sssesstrnent &

the, pèdeoc.f.." C ;ge ce f- 6r9.11 -r, Nc.ctescw- C,.cycp., 9%

0.% ?,$9, Mos, no 4C*, SMw7, nc> L Ed. A4 359 (1990).

¼\c, e B the.cefore-, e..×comine- the, coTe.s c8 e.vidence- .. .....

pee.%enWd in the oc-se-, * See, MrrNW4 v. ©wnte ®hSel M3 (.F(c , 900

th½ tornar tchmo\s ( TMe.\ e,nd Appellc+e5 muje. thele casess nent

cor*ccc3 tea occi conç\rr,tig ¿th %+c.huswec) pceceebw �060ulin c

M9 cv-,.94 iTO (Fies. )WÜ økece¼,. the- F\c>cick bopeeme C�523cte.xpre

ceed iá+w +we swe<-ts hew Re mea u oc gA rn

filt is For the- cad +o c)e+ermine, cm es +½enko\d m½tr,

taket½er the. 5te.Ae h% be.en eMe to pcodfre- e empepe.nt,

schston+kd esidence ¥0 C.cntec,dk,,Y the, cMeMPS Storg,

IS the %½te. Sel¼ in this initted �060cderi,+ben it i%+be

tooM¼. dc*3 to ec.nt e. ment cf ex ui½:d ½ We.

Årfeecht e.A in +¥7. c.be,rr3e n ense-, cs% coeM n%c.ng

ie.ssee - inch..<&ed n�060nse,snct sopW by eke

eddenc-e,.'' b\er v. hote, %9'A kM GM, IP > (Fle~ l DCA 19%

The. rvmt ce.c.e.n½3 es¾i:Aisbet:1 pre44.cknt v0h(c..h ce.Gerence.s the. c8erernen+Cenet

____ ... _FlorALpceur he_t c.<d Ecs±_D:stáct_deósimos..caed_bl._40, _cscrl�060der

c _mesJem-, Akee v. ½w, i as h3cLS% ( Ehld_EA_am31 ;_Qbnio_ the

_._ _ __.. . �060ccenMe._ e Dr¥hc2*L \�254-Ü_A_cocc4cl ...c9inion Mth_the _.ß_on.rnbl�254_

4e_tàdhce _pmu*rneyAba_Le_«±s_we1±on dense,_o -J_sw±£J ews

..._.A_kMeepaken Abch_nsssssment ±bA..r..oucL__....

must ve, the Mr..te the benefi+ nÇ eq cedkets in

___..... _ .. _Abe.. evidenc.E. . . +be_r.ica.xn shnce.s_eithec_40còdhi_._

the Aeânc.e_ t ec h eb net IC Ms ledter, it s

. .____ ___tbs±cid_couces .igc&Qdpea±4_nquùted.___.. _..

Ecang +wer i t_is_±he ppes.melutg_hv£csel__

hbec, Ici, ( en)

__The_ ½umbie_QJkcAen prese-r*ed a co¼gel_soppoátienÍpecnL

n níen) cd s½c+ excect:,ts Scem +he. ca\ec ed vums resenny mr <ms,

ne ¥nec cece>�060cc~tes we*, tu,tc«->nnq b decoyn,%tM e.védence ne>r

ce- rcwhcc&e.cl_b3_sohs.tume.\ æme*nt_uidecre ner».ssay Aca_£sten

._ .. . cernck4\tg..es!tcJe>\;sh A neaQS._p\e,.cin AMMe>ner3rdeau>s c>od tha_cl ec

cumy eceahe c éÆense coe)/ccancesent_

ofece c£ c£ »c±oca_e_ccatescA e ns +esAce enansiens_e£

We»ec's ws .1 m oà hn où ,

DcAnc4Ts½ t s owel\3 proven +benx n acence e

ocwmswue.a eene.e s.name, to we m, us

( FA ht OcmócrÒ." ReçÅeg, �060pc

Tn +wh pcesect me- +wee a ne.vec cc3 e»(cJenc.e psented to

eachush Gr.4 caç sd:c.Mesen uns wMe. The c.c.se. m n-ak;og moce .

c>. creabarq c.en+es* we.e.n es t'A geu cAd tawre. Owe ec) c wt ec,c

cAeb u..cs e. b\e.ch mde, ced *bere. i.ms to socenochn city..omsc ed

eNiÕ«tv-- O cra e-E or chet ds�254, . .

�060echless,v>i+h n we QppemAe. Nevs 5 -xanw c»h e

«s%omes ¥ne. Pe+¼teneck one n+em cxr)/or ¼ eks;ces % emphuc

uegcq comu,,a meA atoner, ca ec) -u>ents meJe

s9pessecJ are v,, cua ywen che e ecennenos c_ccc.ince cs +wca ~ r

ç>cec.;se. p ccç½ Me. Acc)ceu>s invisienecd is besicle. +be_ point onck.c

secHen §%CO.69.", cM He. migb+ as taeO ¼ mic1'rcJAe qcut.cleue

nW, Sec. c½cxbed (Appendix ).

% Reøtow (no e.cconeo.2skt ossessec) the edche one) + e

e,ppliccMe \caa, by c.one)oc.k;cg it·s rev ew en ½e beds d a jacq

c ecl% Ínn o- cA%e pre%e,nh okto_c Cs judgener*ÎÆgJ+ciceic4.. _

. cer*cv c the DdeMts theoc4 8 wen%, cEc.h e.xpoessh e

._________ekcectiq_c.cotg tc> ced_lo__canÈkc-t _us±b meJLutesbRshed . pr t _..__.

en±be.sme,4elo±Le£3cs.a,_The--Bç>peA!cae Ccortleå\ecl±o prAse.a±__ces .

. . tecocck11tcAio_o_5_±ct_qW_Lts_.Ill_ e. d_cd _edqmtedicos pienutviecdecl_. ..

.d+b its sopposinen.

__ ._....__ . _lo...drJte.ctnW _.Mgçelled�254.I..odo.Left_penY_IMtihn_M �2544'_._

soMtchicm chelnotdse_to lbedeve3 Â_cr_csiRoby__ca..ldoc .

cans e±cen £1ccom receswcD, ±hheccMe 3 e Becaen

meAe ce e_econen, >s uiew ef %dea urh_rdtec) on±co£¾ ±o ¼c'tch

htae-s § sm. o n (0 (©. To oodsxntico._wi±bJ soo ostd§eod I

�060tc)cx%cow.s boM

The Bppellede- Ccxd5 meitYeo cçIn60, cçpewMoncd (nmmenW in..

c_itchie:ctiaterpc-e&chic:n -.expce56 chr�254¢*k-dM cA th i-hE (.occe.(-t

c±egretcRon cqí£cntúan Mewec) h3 ekhec- Ccuets, eß o

OM(..L hTON

cordosinn ½e_ PeMHener c>ssech, herein Wrk no chec kiec c

u etc.n_ aciehpançMditcex)t..cr)£eviMÄr_£mplihl:2ith .

Acc,n v. w, eso E.ac) wa,soa (FE. 200Ú be_s y,JteAey 790 M.QS

ucm, n % (Flex, tw c>amooù } Fip pc tc;d u. hye,*e-, 900 %.9d ½95, 507 ( Fic..

t�254,i9.4 So.3r) S93 ( Flcs, 2c) DC-AROid e o a, sopen, r ant >tÃ

ceA �523¾We_ Pippe_McAe_ C..ooct's c (sion in ¥½h pee_sent cAse- en

i ScWl9 pdntS d \�254x..ù.

Nn c*ber ¥0( e e d Çc.ch mic) ce.e- o'wh h Oppekde f,nd5

otr3 §777.09(O 8 the Rocich Sch.2¥es c4 ootuner9 b t¼ PdHoneA

appene.we cumsà %gh expc.nsinn e .w.A v. hte., sss s.ad

c*s c�254w cçpuccae tn % prewot «se

ce , in b+ ch the ce.omns paw½ed in thé priwXe HocM

woner C½)cei ns respecdo\\x ce.c ets, tiv.t this, ½--nere-b4

�060pcerne-Caset tit\ cac-ept Leis criencd hule_ta, evvd "if tk e

F

°

. . . . . . . .= . m. == = = - = .

___ _xcLthe_kts,_raad_mrA_em£c±s becch_oze__tcue_ced ..occe.ch. Exem . .

C,ERGI:TrATE OF 56RVI(.4

I seneay c£UIFY, thck E bcue. p\cuM rs teve c,#v4 e nececi copy of

e 9ecegoic( , b,d,y)fcktc>nca Scief , ine the knA cf Peisen OCD;c_ic.\s

ec M pacpnse ß wolUn + e scume +c> '. Q Sopceçv C.cock OC F\c>cir)s

590 Sæth..Dowd.._.©*eet Ted\ 333ee , E' v3% ec),

Awene (,enerr.d, ½ Câp5wd �060ot, hh½ssee, FL. 323c yew ec

ce ue, FL 32M90

b9

IN THE 50pREME c,ooRT of LogISA

SEGORY AMDREW5

. LA$5 iln

ATE CEELORIDA L:r, c,85E MOU DS -

Respecchot. 49%- R

APPEMO2.% ___ .

o . ¿\¼ Coce Foc

sL% Em

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALFIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

GREGORY ANDREWS,NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

Appellant, FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING ANDDISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v.CASE NO. 1D13-0355

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Opinion filed February 4, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.Brantley S. Clark, Jr., Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Courtenay H. Miller, Assistant PublicDefender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant AttorneyGeneral, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

BENTON, J.

Gregory Andrews, who the state alleged was born on January 11, 1963,

appeals his conviction for solicitation of a child under the age of sixteen (J.M.) to

conunit a lewd or lascivious act in violation of section 800.04(6)(a) and (b),

rubbing her leg. When J.M. said she did not have her phone on her person, he told

her to go get it. She then left the bathroom, grabbed the phone, ran home and

recounted events to her mother, who called the police.

Appellant argues that taking a nude photograph, particularly if the

photographer is also the subject, need not be a lewd or lascivious act. Evidence

that he requested a nude photograph, he maintains, was insufficient to prove

solicitation of a lewd or lascivious act or any other violation of law. He contends,

in short, that there existed insufficient evidence for the jury to conclude that he

acted with lewd or lascivious intent.

As pointed out in Chesebrough v. State, 255 So. 2d 675, 677-78 (Fla. 1971),

the Legislature has not defined the terms "lewd" and "lascivious." But

"[g]enerally speaking, [] these words, when used in a statute to define an offense,

usually have the same meaning, that is, an unlawful indulgence in lust, eager for

sexual indulgence." Id. at 678. See Pamblanco v. State, 111 So. 3d 249, 251 (Fla.

5th DCA 2013) (apparently adopting state's argument that "solicitation, like

attempt, is a crime which focuses on the defendant's intent"); State v. Brabson, 7

So. 3d 1119, 1124 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (stating that our "Supreme Court's holding

in Schmitt[ v. State, 590 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 1991)] appears to be entirely consistent

with the . . . view that the lewdness requirement may be satisfied by the

defendant's intent"). Which acts or conduct is lewd or lascivious is a factual issue

3

non-obscene nudity in photographs or films is a protected form of expression under

the first amendment.") (footnote omitted).

But the precise photograph Mr. Andrews envisioned is beside the point

under section 800.04. In the present case, "the totality of the circumstances was

such that the jury could properly have concluded that defendant's conduct violated

the statute." Egal v. State, 469 So. 2d 196, 198 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). Contrast

Payne v. State, 463 So. 2d 271,271-272 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (holding the act of

urinating in public does not by itself constitute a lewd or lascivious act). We reject

appellant's contention2 that the state had to prove that the nude photo he asked for

would be pornographic, in order to prove that his asking J.M. to disrobe for him in

the bathroom was unlawful under section 800.04(6)(a)&(b), Florida Statutes

(2012).

Uncomfortable after the first bathroom encounter, she testified, because a

man was saying "a whole bunch of stuff" to her that, she said she felt, should have

been directed to "a grown woman," J.M.'s testimony painted a picture for the jury.

The jury evidently credited her testimony that Mr. Andrews asked her to take a

nude photograph on the spot, in the bathroom that only the two of them shared,

while rubbing her leg and looking her "up and down." He might as well have said,

2 Appellant contended in his initial brief that "[i]n order to establish a pictureof a nude minor to be unlawful, the state would have to prove it contained an actuallewd exhibition ofgenitals."

5