riverside community college district budget allocation model

12
RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Budget Allocation Model Development Task Force Friday – November 21, 2008 9:00 - 11:00 a.m. AGENDA I. Welcome and Call to Order - Review minutes of November 7, 2008 meeting II. Budget Allocation Model - Analysis of Norm’s BAM proposal presented on November 7, 2008 - FY 2008-2009 and FY 2009-2010 Budget Projections Strategies for potential Budget Reductions - New and Vacant Position Funding Allocation Methodology - Treatment of Budget Savings and Base Budget Adjustments III. Other - Strategic Enrollment Management IV. Next Meetings (all from 9:00 – 11:00 a.m.) Friday, December 5, 2008 – DL 409 Friday, December 19, 2008 – Citrus Room Friday, January 9, 2009 – Citrus Room Friday, January 23, 2009 – Citrus Room V. Adjournment

Upload: others

Post on 03-Feb-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Budget Allocation Model

RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

Budget Allocation Model Development Task Force Friday – November 21, 2008

9:00 - 11:00 a.m.

AGENDA

I. Welcome and Call to Order

- Review minutes of November 7, 2008 meeting

II. Budget Allocation Model

- Analysis of Norm’s BAM proposal presented on November 7, 2008

- FY 2008-2009 and FY 2009-2010 Budget Projections

� Strategies for potential Budget Reductions

- New and Vacant Position Funding Allocation Methodology

- Treatment of Budget Savings and Base Budget Adjustments

III. Other

- Strategic Enrollment Management

IV. Next Meetings (all from 9:00 – 11:00 a.m.)

� Friday, December 5, 2008 – DL 409

� Friday, December 19, 2008 – Citrus Room

� Friday, January 9, 2009 – Citrus Room

� Friday, January 23, 2009 – Citrus Room

V. Adjournment

Page 2: RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Budget Allocation Model

RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

Budget Allocation Model Development Task Force Meeting of November 21, 2008

MINUTES

Task Force Members

PresentPeter Boelman, Associate Professor, Economics, Social & Behavioral Sciences (Norco) Aaron Brown, Associate Vice Chancellor, Finance Patti Braymer, Interim Vice President, Business Services (Moreno Valley) Jim Buysse, Vice Chancellor, Administration and Finance Becky Elam, Vice President, Business Services (Riverside) Norm Godin, Vice President, Business Services (Norco) Beth Gomez, District Budget Manager Cindy Taylor, Outreach/Passport to College Coordinator (Riverside) Tom Wagner, Associate Professor, Business Administration (Norco) – Arrived at 9:30 a.m. Ajene Wilcoxson, Associate Professor, Business Administration (Riverside) Meghan Skaggs, Treasurer, ASRCC (Norco) Kristen Van Hala – (Recorder) AbsentMichael McQuead, Associate Professor, CIS (Moreno Valley) Meshay Brown, President, ASRCC (Riverside)

I. Meeting was called to order

II. Minutes of November 7, 2008

The minutes of the November 7, 2008 meeting were reviewed and approved without change.

III. Budget Allocation Model

� Review of Norm’s BAM proposal (attached)

o Everything in blue was taken from the BAM summary report that was presented to the

Board of Trustees in May. The yellow line was created to set-aside additional reserve

funds. The intent was to fund as many aspects of the model as possible, before

reducing for the additional reserve set-aside.

1 of 4

Page 3: RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Budget Allocation Model

o The BAM Task Force will need to decide on the importance and priority of the BAM

component - 1% Reserve for Economic Uncertainty.

o Moreno Valley and Norco appear to be impacted the most by the way the additional

set-aside reserve was handled in the adopted budget. This impact was mitigated by the

additional budget augmentations subsequent to budget adoption, The augmentations

are shown as the “Small College Factor.”

o Budget savings treatment still needs to be resolved. Can unused funds be retained at

the site level and roll into the next year, for use on a one-time basis?

o Dr. Buysse cited DeAnza College as a budget example. Their budget was divided into

three groups: the “A” budget for personnel and utilities; the “B” budget (salaries); and

the “C” budget for capital outlay. By consensus of the BAM Task Force, this

methodology will be explored further.

o Historically, the P/T faculty and overload budgets have been over-spent. If this

occurs, how would shortages be handled? Right now they are handled primarily by

salary savings.

o Should it be the responsibility of the site to operate within the budget allocation model

and handle any shortfalls themselves, including in P/T faculty and overload

categories?

o We need to keep in mind that we are transitioning to a three-college system and that

some budget solutions and treatment may need to be phased in over time.

� Budget Reduction Strategies

o The state’s “Big 5” are meeting today. Aaron distributed a handout of a budget

scenario modeling what is expected to be worst-case showing mid-year cuts for 2008-

2 of 4

Page 4: RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Budget Allocation Model

o The projected adjustments and mid-year cuts result in an estimated shortfall of $5

million for 2008-09. Moving into 2009-10, the deficit is projected at $10 million after

the 5% contingency.

o Becky Elam distributed the Budget Allocation Model Principles sheet that was

presented to the Board in May. It has been updated by RCC to show Student Services

as a high priority. Student access, student programs, and stand-alone college status are

all priorities. Prioritizing in-house recruiting for positions instead of outside recruiting

will save money.

o Aaron distributed a revised version of the 2008-09 Budget Allocation Model that has

been updated for the budget augmentations provided to Moreno Valley and Norco

(shown as the Small College Factor.)

o There is approximately $2.1 million left of the Remaining Allocation Increment for

FY 2008-09 after factoring in the growth funding relocation, Lottery reduction, and

Moreno Valley and Norco augmentations.

o Possible consideration of a Golden Handshake.

o Scrutinize expenditures. Look at prior years to see how budget savings were achieved.

o Some budgets cannot be reduced without reducing student services.

o Some budgets have already been cut to fund new positions.

o Maintaining student access should be the primary goal.

3 of 4

Page 5: RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Budget Allocation Model

4 of 4

o Cutting P/T faculty may impact student accessibility. Would it be better to cut online

courses or in-class sections?

o Dr. Buysse will discuss Budget Reduction Strategies with Executive Cabinet on

Monday, November 24th. Communication has to be very clear.

o In the 1990’s, the District did not have any instructional equipment money or

scheduled maintenance money.

o When enrollment fees were increased to $26/unit, demand for classes died. We ought

to assume a similar scenario if the enrollment fees go up to $30/unit.

� Proposal Consensus

o Each Campus and each Vice Chancellor area should develop their own reduction

strategy. Departments can help advise on where cuts can be made. The goal will be to

achieve a 5% cut (approx. $7 million) over an 18-month period.

o It should be emphasized that these are planning strategies only at this point, so we can

be prepared in the event actual reductions become a reality.

IV. Next Meeting

� Next BAM Meeting is scheduled for Friday, December 5, 2008 in the Digital Library 4th floor

conference room, DL 409, 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.

o Discuss the BAM proposals.

Page 6: RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Budget Allocation Model
Page 7: RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Budget Allocation Model
Page 8: RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Budget Allocation Model
Page 9: RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Budget Allocation Model
Page 10: RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Budget Allocation Model

RIVE

RSID

E CO

MM

UNIT

Y CO

LLEG

E D

ISTR

ICT

RIVE

RSID

E CO

MM

UNIT

Y CO

LLEG

E D

ISTR

ICT

BUD

GET

ALL

OCA

TIO

N M

OD

ELBU

DG

ET A

LLO

CATI

ON

MO

DEL

The

BAM

Tas

k Fo

rce

will

con

tinue

to m

eet r

egul

arly

thro

ugho

ut F

Y 20

08-2

009

to a

sses

s an

d ev

alua

te th

e ne

w B

AM a

nd to

con

side

r th

e fo

llow

ing

item

s fo

r th

e Bu

dget

Allo

catio

n M

odel

:

�Re

view

/Ana

lysi

s of

Bas

e Ex

pend

iture

Bud

gets

�D

evel

opm

ent o

f Dis

cipl

ine

WSC

H:F

TEF

Stan

dard

s�

Stud

ent S

ucce

ss In

cent

ive

�N

ew P

ositi

on F

undi

ng A

lloca

tion

Met

hodo

logy

�Tr

eatm

ent o

f Bud

get S

avin

gs�

Base

Bud

get A

djus

tmen

ts�

On-

Line

Edu

catio

n FT

ES A

lloca

tion

�O

ther

Ince

ntiv

es/D

isin

cent

ives

FY 2

009-

2010

Bud

get A

lloca

tion

Mod

el

Pre

sent

ed b

y B

ecky

Ela

m a

t 11-

21-0

8 B

AM

mee

ting

Page 11: RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Budget Allocation Model

�A

stud

ent f

ocus

ed o

rient

atio

n. T

he b

est

inte

rest

of s

tude

nts

will

be

prim

ary.

Stu

dent

Ac

cess

and

Stu

dent

Ser

vice

s w

ill r

emai

n th

e hi

ghes

t prio

rity.

�Co

llegi

ality

.Re

sour

ce a

lloca

tion

mus

t be

view

ed a

s th

e di

strib

utio

n of

fund

s in

a

man

ner

that

is b

est f

or th

e D

istr

ict w

ith a

n un

ders

tand

ing

of th

e “p

ower

of t

hree

”. Co

ntin

ue w

ith th

e fo

cus

on M

oren

o Va

lley

and

Nor

co s

epar

ate

colle

ge g

oal.

Enga

ge th

e co

llege

com

mun

it y in

the

dial

ogue

. Re

duct

ion

mus

t be

equi

tabl

e.

�Lo

ng r

ange

pla

nnin

g. B

y re

lyin

g up

on th

e D

istr

ict s

trat

egic

goa

ls, t

he C

olle

ge E

duca

tion

and

Faci

lity

Mas

ter

Plan

s, th

e St

rate

gic

Plan

ning

and

Pro

gram

Rev

iew

pro

cess

. Vis

ion

mus

t mat

ch p

lann

ing

and

vice

-ver

sa.

Post

pone

cos

tly s

tart

-ups

.

�Em

pow

erm

ent o

f aut

horit

y an

d ac

coun

tabi

lity.

At

the

Colle

ge le

vel.

Aut

horit

y m

ust b

e as

sign

ed a

t the

low

est a

pplic

able

leve

l. Em

pow

er e

ach

entit

y to

det

erm

ine

whe

re

budg

et c

uts

will

com

e fr

om a

nd s

eque

nce

of

cuts

.

�Si

gnifi

canc

e of

fisc

al y

ear b

ound

arie

s. A

lignm

ent

of o

n-go

ing

com

mitm

ents

with

on-

goin

g re

venu

e st

ream

s an

d on

e-tim

e al

loca

tions

with

one

-tim

e ac

quis

ition

s. C

omm

unic

ate

fisca

l inf

orm

atio

n an

d pr

ojec

ted

shor

t ter

m a

nd lo

ng r

ange

impa

cts

to

the

cam

pus

com

mun

ity.

�Ca

mpu

s re

spon

sibi

lity.

By

prov

idin

g Co

llege

s w

ith th

e op

port

unity

and

aut

horit

y to

man

age

budg

ets

by p

rovi

ding

car

ry-o

ver o

f unu

sed

fund

s.

Allo

w e

ach

entit

y to

iden

tify

cut s

eque

nce;

pr

ovid

e fo

r ca

rry-

over

to in

cent

iviz

e co

st

redu

ctio

n an

d pr

omot

e lo

ng-r

ange

pla

nnin

g.

�Fi

duci

ary

resp

onsi

bilit

y. C

ompl

ianc

e w

ith F

eder

al,

Stat

e, a

nd L

ocal

reg

ulat

ions

will

be

adhe

red

to.

This

incl

udes

fund

ing

a m

inim

um fi

ve (5

) per

cent

Re

serv

e fir

st. C

omm

unic

ate

regu

lato

ry

requ

irem

ents

and

cha

nges

to th

e co

llege

fam

ily.

�D

ata

dete

rmin

ed d

ecis

ion-

mak

ing.

The

dat

a el

emen

ts o

f the

mod

el w

ill b

e w

idel

y kn

own

and

dist

ribut

ed. D

owns

trea

m fi

nanc

ial i

mpa

cts

mus

t be

iden

tifie

d in

dec

isio

n-m

akin

g. M

odel

sc

enar

ios.

Del

iber

ate

and

care

ful p

lann

ing

over

kn

ee-j

erk

reac

ting.

Dat

a in

form

ed d

ecis

ions

s h

ould

incl

ude

long

-ter

m im

pact

s.

PRIN

CIPL

ES:

The

Budg

et A

lloca

tion

Mod

el (B

AM) w

ill e

ncou

rage

:

RIVE

RSID

ERI

VERS

IDE

COM

MUN

ITY

COM

MUN

ITY

COLL

EGE

COLL

EGE

DIS

TRIC

TD

ISTR

ICT

BUD

GET

ALL

OCA

TIO

N M

OD

ELBU

DG

ET A

LLO

CATI

ON

MO

DELP

rese

nted

by

Bec

ky E

lam

at 1

1-21

-08

BA

M m

eetin

g

Page 12: RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Budget Allocation Model

�D

ynam

ic.

The

BAM

will

pro

vide

the

abili

ty to

re

flect

cha

nges

in D

istr

ict a

nd C

olle

ge

prio

ritie

s or

str

uctu

re. R

evis

it ba

se b

udge

t and

or

gani

zatio

nal s

truc

ture

. Re

loca

te e

xist

ing

staf

f to

prov

ide

bett

er o

ppor

tuni

ty o

f mee

ting

stan

d al

one

colle

ge s

tatu

s go

al.

�Co

mm

unic

ated

bro

adly

. Th

e Co

llege

co

mm

unity

will

hav

e a

full

unde

rsta

ndin

g of

th

e m

odel

, the

pro

cess

and

resu

lting

fund

ing

deci

sion

s. I

nfor

mat

ion

will

be

easi

ly a

cces

sibl

e an

d cl

early

com

mun

icat

ed. M

aint

ain

an o

pen

dial

ogue

with

the

colle

ge c

omm

unity

.

�Bo

ttom

-up

and

Top-

dow

n. M

echa

nism

s w

ill

exis

t for

inpu

t fro

m a

ll le

vels

of t

he C

olle

ge

com

mun

ity in

clud

ing

stud

ents

. Allo

w e

ach

entit

y to

det

erm

ine

whe

re b

udge

t cut

s w

ill

com

e fr

om.

�Ea

sy to

app

ly.

The

mod

el m

ust b

e st

raig

htfo

rwar

d in

its

appl

icat

ion.

�A

deci

sion

-mak

ing

tool

. Th

e BA

M m

ust

supp

ort s

trat

egic

pla

nnin

g, p

lann

ed g

row

th,

prog

ram

exp

ansi

on a

nd c

ontr

actio

n.Th

e BA

M

mus

t be

able

to r

espo

nd to

cris

isas

wel

l as

mul

ti-ye

ar p

lans

.

�Ev

alua

ted

and

asse

ssed

. O

n an

ann

ual b

asis

an

d im

prov

ed a

s ap

prop

riate

. St

rate

gic

Enro

llmen

t Man

agem

ent t

echn

ique

s sh

ould

be

intr

oduc

ed a

nd im

plem

ente

d.

�Ra

tiona

l. B

udge

ts m

ust r

efle

ct n

eeds

and

av

aila

ble

reso

urce

s. W

hen

imbe

dded

form

ula’

s do

n’t w

ork,

alte

rnat

ive

optio

ns m

ust b

e av

aila

ble.

Reo

rgan

ize

in a

sen

sibl

e an

d ef

ficie

nt

man

ner.

Ide

ntify

dup

licat

ion

of e

ffor

t and

co

nsol

idat

e to

eli m

inat

e re

dund

ancy

. Fi

ll va

canc

ies

from

with

in.

�Ti

mel

y. A

lloca

tion

of fu

nds

thro

ugh

the

BAM

w

ill b

e di

strib

uted

in a

tim

ely

man

ner

to a

llow

fo

r th

ough

tful

impl

emen

tatio

n of

pla

ns.

Pr

oact

ive

mea

sure

s ta

ken

now

will

alle

viat

e fe

ar

and

unav

oida

ble

actio

ns in

the

near

futu

re.

PRIN

CIPL

ES:

The

Budg

et A

lloca

tion

Mod

el (B

AM) w

ill b

e:

RIVE

RSID

ERI

VERS

IDE

COM

MUN

ITY

COM

MUN

ITY

COLL

EGE

COLL

EGE

DIS

TRIC

TD

ISTR

ICT

BUD

GET

ALL

OCA

TIO

N M

OD

ELBU

DG

ET A

LLO

CATI

ON

MO

DELP

rese

nted

by

Bec

ky E

lam

at 1

1-21

-08

BA

M m

eetin

g