risk matrix template

1
1a Decreasing 1b 1c 1d 1e 2a Decreasing 2b 2c 2d 3a A; B; C; X; Y; Z Static 3b 3c 3d Example: Personal Behaviour - Registrants violate boundaries Registrants fail to establish appropriate boundaries with services users, i.e. do not explain professional relationship to service users and violate boundaries, i.e. emotional, sexual, etc. Registrants abuse their position of power. Disclaimer: The purpose of this generic example is to give applicants an idea of how to complete this matrix. It would not necessarily be described as it is done here. The existing controls and mitigation actions are some of the possible controls and actions we would expect to see in place but not all of them are listed here. For example, for this specific risk safeguarding issues would have to be considered and actions put in place. The inherent and residual risk factor are not a real assessment - they were included here to demonstrate how to calculate the factor. 12 Likelihood 4 Impact 3 Existing Controls: Adherence to Ethical Framework and Code of Practice. Mandatory CPD and supervision audited by Professional Standards Authority at annual renewal of registration. Training provided by organisation. Leaflets and other information material available to registrants. Professional Conduct Procedure in place. Case facts and sanctions published on website to promote learning amongst registrants. Effectiveness of Mitigation: annual review of conduct cases suggests reduction of complaints against registrants in relation to boundary violations. 6 L (2) I (3) X (organisation holding register) Example: Technical Competence - Lack of effectiveness Registrants do not have the skills to practice so service provided does not have expected effect/outcome. Registrants cannot identify underlying issues and do not refer service user to appropriate qualified professional. Disclaimer: The purpose of this generic example is to give applicants an idea of how to complete this matrix. It would not necessarily be described as it is done here. 20 L (4) I (5) Existing control: Education and training equips registrant with skills to practice. Mandatory CPD requirements assist registrants to keep their skills up to date. Mandatory supervision identifies potential skill gaps and recommends appropriate training. Registrants sign up to Code of Practice/Ethical Framework that require them to practise within their competence and refer service users to other professionals if required. Organisation provides guidance on underlying health/social issues, for example, offers a protocol/checklist to registrants with common issues and symptoms. Effectiveness of mitigation: reduced number of complaints alleging lack of therapeutical effectiveness; feedback from supervisors; organisation monitors use of protocol/checklist by registrants and ascertains that 90% of registrants use the protocol; research demonstrates issue/risk is managed appropriately; organisation offers CPD on effectiveness and underlying issues undertaken by 70% of registrants. 4 L (2) I (2) X (organisation holding register); registrant; supervisor Example: Business Practice - Misleading advertising by registrants 16 L(4) I(4) 8 L (4) I (2) HEADLINE RISK DESCRIPTION OF RISK INHERENT RISK FACTOR IDENTIFY EXISTING CONTROLS & EFFECTIVENESS OF MITIGATION IS RISK DECREASING, INCREASING OR STATIC? RESIDUAL RISK FACTOR RISK OWNER

Upload: karan-kumar

Post on 15-Sep-2015

6 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Risk Matrix Template

TRANSCRIPT

Significant risksHEADLINE RISKDESCRIPTION OF RISKINHERENT RISK FACTORIDENTIFY EXISTING CONTROLS & EFFECTIVENESS OF MITIGATIONIS RISK DECREASING, INCREASING OR STATIC?RESIDUAL RISK FACTORRISK OWNER1aExample: Personal Behaviour - Registrants violate boundariesRegistrants fail to establish appropriate boundaries with services users, i.e. do not explain professional relationship to service users and violate boundaries, i.e. emotional, sexual, etc. Registrants abuse their position of power.

Disclaimer: The purpose of this generic example is to give applicants an idea of how to complete this matrix. It would not necessarily be described as it is done here. The existing controls and mitigation actions are some of the possible controls and actions we would expect to see in place but not all of them are listed here. For example, for this specific risk safeguarding issues would have to be considered and actions put in place. The inherent and residual risk factor are not a real assessment - they were included here to demonstrate how to calculate the factor. 12Likelihood 4Impact 3Existing Controls: Adherence to Ethical Framework and Code of Practice. Mandatory CPD and supervision audited by Professional Standards Authority at annual renewal of registration. Training provided by organisation. Leaflets and other information material available to registrants. Professional Conduct Procedure in place. Case facts and sanctions published on website to promote learning amongst registrants. Effectiveness of Mitigation: annual review of conduct cases suggests reduction of complaints against registrants in relation to boundary violations. Decreasing6L (2)I (3)X (organisation holding register)1b1c1d1e2aExample: Technical Competence - Lack of effectivenessRegistrants do not have the skills to practice so service provided does not have expected effect/outcome. Registrants cannot identify underlying issues and do not refer service user to appropriate qualified professional.

Disclaimer: The purpose of this generic example is to give applicants an idea of how to complete this matrix. It would not necessarily be described as it is done here. 20 L (4)I (5)Existing control: Education and training equips registrant with skills to practice. Mandatory CPD requirements assist registrants to keep their skills up to date. Mandatory supervision identifies potential skill gaps and recommends appropriate training. Registrants sign up to Code of Practice/Ethical Framework that require them to practise within their competence and refer service users to other professionals if required. Organisation provides guidance on underlying health/social issues, for example, offers a protocol/checklist to registrants with common issues and symptoms. Effectiveness of mitigation: reduced number of complaints alleging lack of therapeutical effectiveness; feedback from supervisors; organisation monitors use of protocol/checklist by registrants and ascertains that 90% of registrants use the protocol; research demonstrates issue/risk is managed appropriately; organisation offers CPD on effectiveness and underlying issues undertaken by 70% of registrants.Decreasing4L (2)I (2)X (organisation holding register);registrant;supervisor2b2c2d3aExample: Business Practice - Misleading advertising by registrantsA; B; C;16L(4)I(4)X; Y; Z Static8L (4)I (2)3b3c3d

&"Arial,Bold"&14CHRE Risk Register 2011-12&12Last updated 28/04/11

&9NOTE: each risk is scored according to the risk matrix. &10&"Arial,Bold"&9KEY: LA Linda Allan, CB Christine Braithwaite, HC Harry Cayton, RS Ros Hayles, SMT Senior Management TeamPage &P of &N

Page &P of &N