risk management in todays uncertain environment 3 2009
DESCRIPTION
Key risk issues for insurersTRANSCRIPT
Jason A. JonesE -ma i l : j j o n e s@ J on e sS t r a t e g yC on su l t i n g . c omPhone : ( 732 ) 476 -6387
Be rmuda , Ma r ch 19 – 20 , 2009
Risk Management in Today’s Uncertain Environment
Parad igm Shi f t f rom Risk to Uncerta inty
The Risk Management Agenda for 2009
Re-assessing Investment Risk
Fixing Broken Risk Models
Managing to Higher Capital Requirements
Proactive Cycle Management
Focus on Counterparty Risk
About Jones St rategy Consu l t ing
Copyright 2009, Jones Strategy Consulting, Inc. 3/17/2009
2
Overview
Paradigm Shift from Risk to Uncertainty
3/17/2009Copyright 2009, Jones Strategy Consulting, Inc.
3
A new approach to risk management is needed to address uncertainty, not just risk
� The financial crisis put uncertainty at the fore
� What’s the difference?� Risk – randomness with known probability
� Car accident frequency, odds of royal flush in poker
� Uncertainty – randomness with unknown probability
� Impact of global warming, outcome of financial crisis
� Risk models can measure risk but not uncertainty, so models are not enough
� A new thinking is required
Paradigm Shift from Risk to Uncertainty
3/17/2009Copyright 2009, Jones Strategy Consulting, Inc.
4
Wrong thinking:� Everything can be assessed in a mathematical model
� Human behavior and risk arbitrage don’t matter
� Inter-relationships among risks are simple enough to be quantified (e.g., correlations or copulas)
Better thinking:� Look for multiple ways of evaluating risk
� Uncertainty is affected by human behavior
� The past is not always a reliable indicator of the future
� Complex systems can’t be modeled with “hard science”
Paradigm Shift from Risk to Uncertainty
3/17/2009Copyright 2009, Jones Strategy Consulting, Inc.
5
It is, I think, particularly in periods of acknowledged crisis that scientists have turned to philosophical analysis as a device for unlocking the riddles of their field. Scientists have not generally needed or wanted to be philosophers.
- Thomas Kuhn
The Risk Management Agenda for 2009
3/17/2009Copyright 2009, Jones Strategy Consulting, Inc.
6
� Re-assessing Investment Risk
� Fixing Broken Risk Models
� Managing to Higher Capital Requirements
� Proactive Cycle Management
� Focus on Counterparty Risk
The Risk Management Agenda for 2009Re-assessing Investment Risk
3/17/2009Copyright 2009, Jones Strategy Consulting, Inc.
7
� Investment risk appeared artificially low due to:� Trend of rising financial leverage 1984–2007
� Untested structured finance and derivative products hid risk and leverage
� Issues hurting investments today:� Systemic de-leveraging
� Uncertain public policy response to financial crisis
� Mortgage defaults keep rising
� Investment risk is being re-assessed:� De-risking for liquidity and capital preservation
� Focus on gross risk rather than net risk
The Risk Management Agenda for 2009Fixing Broken Risk Models
3/17/2009Copyright 2009, Jones Strategy Consulting, Inc.
8
� Many risk models are seriously flawed� Economic capital models are proving unstable
� Catastrophe models substantially under-estimated losses from hurricanes Ike (2008) and Katrina (2005)
� Models don’t capture the whole picture (risks or uncertainties that go unconsidered – lack of imagination)
� Rare events are hard to model due to unreliable data
The Risk Management Agenda for 2009Fixing Broken Risk Models
3/17/2009Copyright 2009, Jones Strategy Consulting, Inc.
9
Loss of model credibility� AIG’s economic capital model indicated enough capital to
withstand 1-in-2000-year loss – 3 months before AIG’s collapse!
� On the folly of modeling 1-in-2000-year events (AKA 99.95% confidence level over 1-year horizon):Putting this into historical perspective, it means withstanding World Wars I and II, the Great Depression, the death of 30% to 60% of Europe’s population during the Black Death in the 1340’s, the fall of the Roman Empire, and countless other catastrophes and cataclysms in the past two millennia. No company on earth could find a credible way to model all of these risks, let alone manage capital requirements with such a model.- Quarterly Insurance Round-up: Third Quarter 2008, Jones Strategy
Consulting
� So why are ING, Allianz and others modeling at “confidence levels” of 99.95% or higher?
The Risk Management Agenda for 2009Fixing Broken Risk Models
3/17/2009Copyright 2009, Jones Strategy Consulting, Inc.
10
� What’s the solution?� Assess risk in multiple ways
� No black box models
� Use techniques to reduce model error
� Remove from portfolio any risks which are: not understood, unlimited or un-quantifiable
� Use risk limits as safety nets
� Model the whole loss distribution (good, bad and the ugly):
� Good: 1-in-2 year scenario, expected loss
� Bad: 1-in-20-year scenario, use reliable in-sample data
� Ugly: Very rare scenarios that can’t be modeled statistically – use scenario analysis, sensitivity analysis
� Control and manage risk - don’t just measure it
� Management judgment
The Risk Management Agenda for 2009Managing to Higher Capital Requirements
3/17/2009Copyright 2009, Jones Strategy Consulting, Inc.
11
� Insurers need more capital� Risk is elevated due to financial crisis and soft market
� Investment losses took a big toll on capital
� Top 10 P/C insurers lost 25% of their capital in 2008
� Frozen capital markets – no more “just in time capital”
� Actions to take� Retain capital – hold steady or cut dividends and share
buybacks
� Favor de-risking and rate adequacy over market share
The Risk Management Agenda for 2009Managing to Higher Capital Requirements
3/17/2009Copyright 2009, Jones Strategy Consulting, Inc.
12
Company
Shareholders’ Equity
12/31/2008
Shareholders’ Equity
12/31/2007 Change
Hartford Ins Group 9,268 19,204 -51.7%
American International Group, Inc 52,710 95,801 -45.0%
Allstate Ins Group 12,641 21,851 -42.1%
CNA Ins Cos 6,877 10,150 -32.2%
Liberty Mutual Ins Cos 10,160 12,366 -17.8%
W.R. Berkley Group 3,046 3,570 -14.7%
Progressive Ins Group 4,215 4,936 -14.6%
Berkshire Hathaway Ins 109,267 120,733 -9.5%
Chubb Group of Ins Cos 13,432 14,445 -7.0%
Travelers Ins Companies 25,319 26,616 -4.9%
Total 246,935 329,672 -25.1%
Figures in $ millions
The Risk Management Agenda for 2009Proactive Cycle Management
3/17/2009Copyright 2009, Jones Strategy Consulting, Inc.
13
� The soft market continues� Global recession means lower insurance demand, downward
rate pressure and more competition
� Forecast: Return of hard market (2010); Rate adequacy (2011)
� Investments will not help� Expect investment losses and low investment income in 2009
� Key actions to manage the cycle� Better metrics
� Control terms and conditions
� Be careful of new business
� Allocate capital
� Build a foundation of accountability
� Act quickly and aggressively
Watch for changes in loss cost inflation or deflation!
See my white paper, Managing the Underwriting Cycle
The Risk Management Agenda for 2009Proactive Cycle Management
3/17/2009Copyright 2009, Jones Strategy Consulting, Inc.
14
� Insurance rates keep declining� MarketScout:
� P/C rates fell 8% in February 2009
� Rate of decline is down from double digits
� Declines across all classes
� Cumulative rate decline exceeded 32% since February 2005!
� Reinsurers are turning the corner� Guy Carpenter report on January 2009 renewals:
� Prop/cat rates up 8% and casualty rates up 5%
The Risk Management Agenda for 2009Focus on Counterparty Risk
3/17/2009Copyright 2009, Jones Strategy Consulting, Inc.
15
� Counterparty risk is everywhere� Investments
� Derivatives / hedges
� Policyholders and agents
� Reinsurers
� Insurer responses:� Diversifying reinsurance programs
� Focusing on gross exposures (not just net)
� Re-evaluating policyholder behavior and agent balance receivables
� Reducing counterparty concentrations
� Investment de-risking
The Risk Management Agenda for 2009Focus on Counterparty Risk
3/17/2009Copyright 2009, Jones Strategy Consulting, Inc.
16
� Use your own due diligence and judgment!…regulators and investors should return to the tool they used to assess credit risk before they began delegating responsibility to the credit rating agencies. That tool is called judgment.
- New York Times, March 16, 2009, page A23. Opinion piece “Rated F for Failure” by Jerome S. Fons and Frank Partnoy.
Reinsurance and Insurance Risk,
Finance, and Strategy:
ERM
Rating Agency Relations
Cycle Management
Risk Metrics and Reporting
Counterparty Credit Risk
Capital Management
Copyright 2009, Jones Strategy Consulting, Inc. 3/17/2009
17
About Jones Strategy Consulting
3/17/2009
18
Copyright 2009, Jones Strategy Consulting, Inc.
402 Main Street, Suite 100-329Metuchen, NJ 08840
www.JonesStrategyConsulting.com