risk management at wellfleet bank (1)
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
1/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
1
Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
MSF 2013 SummerCase Study
Group 4
Bar Brieman
Vincent Zann
Carlos Castillo
Kevin Johnson
Kelin Xiang
Min Chen
Professor Dandapani
July 26th2013
-
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
2/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
2
Table of content:
Abstract------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3
Part One: Strategy and Risks----------------------------------------------------------------------4-5
Different Types of Risks Regarding Wellfleet Bank-------------------------------------4
How did those risks affect Wellfleet----------------------------------------------------------4-5
Part Two: Risk Metrics-------------------------------------------------------------------------------6
Part Three: Proposals and Decisions---------------------------------------------------------------7-11
Proposal 1----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7-8
Proposal 2----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------9-10
Final Decision-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------11
Part Four: Risk Management and Process------------------------------------------------------12-14
Appendix--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------15-21
-
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
3/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
3
Abstract
Wellfleet Bank was founded in London in 1847 and used to be the bank that provides its services
to Asian and African colony. During the period of 1960 to 1990, the bank made major decisions
and decided to go global and focus in North American and Europe. After the European
property/credit crisis in 1989-1992, the bank switched its core markets in emerging economies.
Corporate Banking and Consumer Banking were the two main businesses the bank had
undertaken. It had 58% and 42% of its Pre-Tax profits respectively. In 2007, the bank operated
in 55 countries with total assets of $329 billion and market cap of $51 billion. The bank focused
more on the syndicated and leveraged loans segment to its large corporate clients. Syndicated
and Leveraged loans are carried through by Investment Banking division and Wellfleet had its
own IB decision. In this paper, we examined the kind of risks that were associated with Wellfleet
and analyzed the impact of those risks. We also compared the two major proposals and made
relative decisions.
-
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
4/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
4
Part One: Strategy and Risk
1.1Given its strategy, what kind of risk does Wellfleet bank face?
In 2004, Wellfleets management had identified both syndicated and leveraged loans to
large corporate clients as areas of significant future growth for its corporate banking business,
and they strategically intended to pursue large transformational deals through its corporate
banking segment. They also formed a decision making forum consisting of three major members:
the group chief credit officer, deputy group chief risk officer and group head of client
relationships. Since the deals pursued by the bank were of large scale, these large scale credit
applicants itself could bring mega-risk to Wellfleet. Firstly, we can identify the first possible risk
would be the operational risk. In this case, it is mentioned that the chief credit officer can make
the final decision. The authority of this chief credit officer was unlimited as long as it is within
the bank regulatory limits. Further, the CEO/Board of Directors only reviews the corporate loan
portfolio and do not have any direct involvement with the process. If the deputy group chief risk
officer and group head of client relationship disagreed over a proposal, then the chief credit
officer can make the final decision. Industries with higher human interaction are likely to have
higher operational risk. Also, the bank had identified leveraged loans and syndicated loans as the
future growth segments. But those leveraged loans are provided to borrowers with existing high
debt risk of default. This could affect Wellfleet tremendously.
The second risk that Wellfleet is facing is the regulatory riskwhich is in compliance with
the Basel II standards and credit risks. Wellfleet should set aside and manage capital reserve to
be balanced with the riskiness of their activity. It defines as the risk that a change in laws and
regulations will materially impact a security, business, sector or market. A change in laws or
regulations made by the government or a regulatory body can increase the costs of operating a
business, reduce the attractiveness of investment and/or change the competitive landscape. 1
Wellfleet has a very high concentration on its Corporate Banking Group, which can be led
to concentration risk. In the case, Wellfleet corporate banking group constituted 58% of profit
before taxes and 72% of banks assets in 2007 while the remaining portion is attributed to its
consumer banking group. The consumer banking group accounted for bad debt provisions of
1http://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/regulatory_risk.asp
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/regulatory_risk.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/regulatory_risk.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/regulatory_risk.asphttp://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/regulatory_risk.asp -
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
5/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
5
$611 million in 2006 as compared to $214 million in 2004. 2If the bank concentrated too much
on corporate banking, the probability of loss would be higher from heavy lopsided exposure.
Wellfleet could also risk its own reputation. Reputational riskis defined as a threat or
danger to the good name or standing of a business or entity.3 As mentioned in the case, Wellfleet
has two proposals to be reviewed. This two proposals concerns with large amount of money that
is around 2 billion. If the bank rejects, then the trustworthiness of this bank would drop.
Wellfleet is also associated with country risk:A collection of risks associated with investing in
a foreign country4. These risks include political risk, exchange rate risk, economic risk,
sovereign risk and transfer risk.
1.2 Given Wellfleets new focuson large corporate deals and its need to recruit relationship
managers from investment banks, what are the challenges for the risk culture of the
organization, and its style of risk management in particular?
According to the case, we have already known that Wellfleet concentrated on corporate
banking. Although it is very profitable for the bank to focus on enlarging transformational deals
with clients, it involves a lot of challenges and risks. Risk culture can be defined as the system of
values and behaviors present throughout an organization that shape risk decisions 5. Risk culture
of the organization at Wellfleet focuses on the interaction between credit committee, clients and
client relationships managers. It can influence the decision making and relationship between
managers and employees. Client relationships managers are who directly contact each other and
understand their needs to find better profitable solution for both sides. Then the bank offers their
proposal via client relationship manager. However, most of the times, chief risk officer and head
of client relationship disagree over the proposals. In Wellfleet, it has a hierarchical work process
in credit officers. The credit committee has the ultimate authority on decisions.
2Harvard Case: Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank3http://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/reputational-risk.asp4http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/countryrisk.asp5http://www.businessweek.com/managing/content/may2009/ca20090512_720476.htm
-
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
6/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
6
Part Two: Risk Metrics
2.1 Calculate the Expected Loss, Economic Revenue and Economic Profit for both proposals?
Wellfleets credit risk management had taken a holistic picture of the risks associated with
the proposals. As importance was shined on their expected loss, economic revenue, andeconomic profit, risk models associated with each exposure had been used for the risk-adjustedrevenues.
The following describes the metrics used in internal risk assessment methodologies:
Exhibit 3Internal Risk Assessment: MethodologyThe risk-adjusted revenue measures revenues adjusted to the expected losses. This
measurement must be positive for it to be approved and any exceptions are must be reviewed bythe head of client relationship. The economic revenue measures revenues adjusted for expectedloss and capital charge. Lastly, the economic profit measures profits after accounting for
overhead costs from the finance department and taxes.6
The expected loss calculates a borrowers default and equals to: the Probability of Default (PD)
Loss Given Default (LGD%) Exposure at Default (EAD$). The probability of defaultmeasures the likelihood the borrower would default in the next twelve months; thus, the lowerthe better quality loan. Internal grades were developed based on internal loan ratings rangingfrom 1A to 11B, from least likely to most likely to default, respectively. The LGD is thepercentage of the loan exposure that cant be recovered in the event of default. Lastly, the EAD
measured the total current outstanding credit to the borrower and the estimated future drawdownon the account prior to default7. Additionally, the credit officers accounted for corporate ratingsfrom Moodys, Standard & Poors, and other rating agencies.
6Anette Mikes,Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals, (Harvard Business School 9-109-071), 22.7Mikes, 6.
Risk-AdjustedRevenue (RAR)
Economic Profit(EP)
EconomicResearch (ER)
-
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
7/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
7
Part Three: Proposals and Decisions
Proposal 1:
Ashar Business Credit Proposal - Zellmont Acquisition
Counterparty: Ashar Industries Date: April 7, 2006Wellfleet Rating 5A Market Cap: UDS 25.2 billion
Probability of Default(PD) 0.22%Loss Given Default(LGD) 56.86%
Exposure at Default (EAD$) $850,000,000
Expected Loss PD*LDG*EAD = $1,063,282
Interest Income, based on draw amount 0.525% $4,462,500
Plus Fee Income:
Underwriting Fee 0.20% $1,700,000Participation Fee 0.20% $1,700,000
Total Revenue $7,862,500
Risk Adjusted Revenue Total Revenue - Total Expected Loss = $6,799,218
Net Capital Charge $2,200,000
Economic Revenue Risk Adjusted Revenue - Net Capital Charge = $4,599,218
Transaction Cost less $825,713
Tax less $1,500,000
Economic Profit $2,273,505
3.1 Decision on Ashar-Zellmont acquisition:Ashar Industries decision to aquire Zellmontwill maintain its global position as the largest
steel producer to lead the competition. Its diversified revenue streams allow it to pull growthwithin competitive markets like North America and Europe, 40% sales and 33% salesrespectively. Zellmonts peer analysis is considered to have fairly lower risk to its currentcompetitors at 0.09 asset volatility. In contrast, Ashars ratings are considered to have a higher
asset volatility at 0.16. Moodys grade considers Zellmont Baa2/positive and S&P with
BBB/watch developments, yet Ashars with Moodys grade level at Baa3/review for downgradeand S&P ratings are BBB+/watch negative. Given these conditions, Ashar is performing well incomparison its industry and strong fundamental growth is expected from this acquisition.Their highly leveraged complex debt structure in the past created credit challenges to pin point
their sensitivity to interest rates and cost of debt or equity during acquisitions. On the contrary,Ashar Indistries has a strong track record from deleveraging. Their highly acquisitive historybrings integration risk, yet their ability to have high EBITDA margins and consistently maintainpositive free cash flows create strong sentiment to its spending flexibilities. From the
-
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
8/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
8
fundamental standpoint their three-year revenue CAGR provides insight to their growth storyand reflects strong at 79.20%, year ended 2005.
Its bottom line net income has improved since 2003 and reinforces trust that managementled by Amit Ashar and two sons have a positive effect on its earnings. Revenue diversificationthrough this acquisition will allow it to further expand their pallet into European jurisdictions andfurther deepen their positions in North America, Western Europe, Africa, and South America.Most of their sales within these markets will be mostly affected by new car sales, constructionand appliance & packaging. As their management team expects pre-tax cost synergies of $1billion to be realized within the first three years from takeover, Ashar Industries will hold astrong global market share position of 10% by volume.In conclusion, the Zellmont acquisition provided Wellfleets risk management assumption of
Amit Ashars full control of management and relaxed their sensitivity assumptions to determineif the Zellmont deal were unsuccessful. This provided positive free cash flows in both testedscenarios apart from analyzing their credit risk and broader risk issues which were reviewed bythe Group Credit Committee.8
8Mikes, 9.
0
2
4
68
10
12
14
2002 2003 2004 2005
D&A EBITDA Net income
0
500
1000
15002000
2500
3000
3500
2002 2003 2004 2005
Free Cash Flow
-
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
9/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
9
Proposal 2
Gatwick Gold Corporation (GGC) Business Credit Proposal
Counterparty: GGC Date: October 10, 2008
Wellfleet Rating 5B Market Cap: UDS 25.2 billion
Probability of Default (PD) 0.39%Loss Given Default (LGD) 52.25%
Exposure at Default (EAD$) $1,000,000,000
Expected Loss PD*LDG*EAD = $2,037,750
Interest Income, based on draw amount:
EAD*Rate*0.5=
1st sixmo. 0.425% $2,125,000
EAD*Rate*0.5=
2nd sixmo. 0.525% $2,625,000
Plus Up-front Fee Income 0.30% $3,000,000
Total Revenue $7,750,000Risk Adjusted Revenue Total Revenue - Total Expected Loss = $5,712,250
Net Capital Charge $3,800,000
Economic Revenue Risk Adjusted Revenue - Net Capital Charge = $1,912,250
Transaction Cost less $300,000
Tax less $920,000
Economic Profit (year 1) $692,250
GGC Convertible Bond Expiration
Due February 27, 2009
Conversion Price $65
Out of the money $18.40Convertible BondsOutstanding 15,384,615 estimated
3.2 Decisions on GGC
GGCs exposure to political risk in South Africa with about 72% of its current productionbrings uncertainty of consistent future growth. In accounting for the three main components formining costs, including electricity, labor, and equipment costs, mining inflationary costs aresetting pressures in the rising competitive industry. The macro-economic agenda must beconsidered to forecast future growth of GGC. Fundamentally, GGCs revenues have maintained
consistent over the prior years. Gold prices have fluctuated in most recent months during 2008due to volatile uncertain markets. The greater issue stemming from bailouts, the more US Fed
-
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
10/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
10
and global systemic risks will arise. The estimated convertible bond expiration GGC has torefinance will bring sustainability through this facility request.
Wellfleets economic profits will be less than a percent: .069%, in economic profits within atwo year time frame, in comparison to the Zellmont acquisition at .26%. GGCshighlyleveraged environment has increased its debt to equity to 82% thus decreasing its interest
coverage ratio. Highly reliant on future financing and interest repayment, its ability to sustainrelies heavily on demand and gold price sentiments. Given their decreasing rates due to marketconditions, this deal becomes highly speculative in times of uncertainty and as Wellfleetsinitiative to unwind its hedge book from losses. Its position had been affected due to the creditcrunch unfolding and should star considering reassessing its dividend payouts of 20%.
On the positive note, considering they are the worlds third largest gold producer with 7%global production, low-cost production levels in comparison to the lower 50% of global costs onaverage, and their long term arena for safe investor exposures. This deal may be considered ifWellfleet feels their holdings on precious metals percentage needs additional exposure toincrease their risk weighted asset consideration.
0
2
4
6
8
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Net debt to EBITDA
Total debt to common equity
-50.00%
0.00%
50.00%
100.00%
150.00%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Net margin ROE Efficiency Ratio
-
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
11/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
11
3.3 Closing Statement
From the Economic and Financial perspective, the Proposal 1 (Ashar Industries) holds a
stronger position in finance, such as growing at a rate thats higher than industry standards. It is
the worlds largest steel producer (high volume) and they specialize in low-end commodity steel(low risk) with high level of raw material integration. Overall, they have good financial
performance, high EBITDA margins. From the managerial perspective, Ashar Industries run by
family for a long time and have been in the hands of experienced management that succeed in
turning around unproductive assets in the history. They also have abundant experience in
acquisitions and mergers. However, they have taken a huge amount of debt, which puts the
company at a risky financial position. Plus, the complexity of the financial structure has made it
harder to solve the current problem.
In Proposal 2, Gatwick Gold Corporation has had negative growth over the past 3 years and
was unable to service its present debt. Even though, the future outlook must be considered with
respect to the industry it operates in, we suggest that Wellfleet stay away from GGC until it
makes profit.
-
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
12/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
12
Part Four: Risk Management Process
4.1 Analyze the risk management process at Wellfleet Bank. What suggestions might you make to
the CEP about improving the process?
Risk management and internal control have crucial importance in banking activities. Asrequired by the Basel Committee of International Settlements, Wellfleet Bank implementedBasel II Accord and guidelines and formalized their risk-management practices. The reservecapital is monitored and managed to match the riskiness of their activities.
The internal control system within Wellfleet Bank is a balance of functions betweenrelationship managers and risk officers. Relationship managers court clients and bring inbusiness and revenues with margins and fee that the bank would earn. They would like to havetheir proposals approved so that they could get their incentives. Meanwhile, risk officers wouldundertake independent risk analysis to identify the internal risk within the proposal and makereward characteristics transparent. Risk officers would hold or disapprove those proposals whosebuilt-in risk is beyond criteria and policies.
Within the risk-management function, a hierarchy structure exists on bases of individualexperience of credit officers. The lowest level is credit officer who is authorized to sign offcertain types of business proposals. The more experienced a credit officer is, the risker and largerloans could be signed off. If a loan exceeds the credit officers limit, it should be passed forward
to regional credit officer for decision. At the paramount of this hierarchy is the Group CreditCommittee who obtains unlimited decision power on any loans within the banks regulatorylimits.
The Group Credit Committee consists of three senior members in the bank: the group chiefcredit officer, who serves as chair, the deputy chief risk officer, and the group head of clientrelationships, who represents the business viewpoint. This committee structure guarantees thedecision process is a balancing mechanism between credit function and relationship function.
Therefore, any credit proposal which is too big is required not signed-off before it gets the GroupCredit Committee.
Credit Officer
Regional Credit Officer
GroupCredit
Committe
Chief Credit Officer
Deputy Chief Risk Officer
Head of Client Relationship
Graph 1: Hierarchy Structure
-
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
13/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
13
Besides the Group Credit Committee, there are another seven risk committees operatingseparately on additional sources of risks, covering market risk, operational risk, compliance risk,country risk, reputation risk and business risk. These eight risk committees work under theGroup Risk Committee and deliver risk report quarterly. The chief risk officer report to theboard-level Audit and Risk Committee.
4.2 Problems and Improvements
The first problem stems from the hierarchy structure within the credit function. Torelationship managers, the Alpine Pass approach is time-consuming and reduces their serviceefficiency to their clients. If a proposal with known characteristics should go through the basiclevels to reach Group Credit Committee for final approval, it will take more time than necessaryto seal a deal. This inefficiency will reduce the attractiveness to potential clients and make thebank lose competitiveness to other banks.
A solution would be to develop a flat decision structure based proposal characteristics, suchas loan size, applicant company size, applicant history records. While small loans by smallcompany with good records could be signed off by credit officers, big loan by large companywith spot records could directly go to the Group Credit Committee. The graph belowdemonstrates how it works.
Loan
AssessmentLoan Size Company Size History Record
Credit Regional Credit
Officer
Group Credit
Committee
Graph 3: Flat Structure
GroupCredit
Committee
MarketRisk
Committee
CountryRisk
Committee
ReputationRisk
Committee
BusinessRisk
Committee
(Consumer)
BusinessRisk
Committee
(Corporate)
OperationalRisk
Committee
ComplianceRisk
Committee
Group Risk Committee
Board Audit and Risk Committee
Graph 2: Committee Structure
-
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
14/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
14
Another main problem is due to the committee structure. The eight subordinate committeescould specialize in risk assessment by focusing on the risk of their individual field. However,risk management is not particle physics. Risks of different types interact with each other. Defectin reputation could impair credit risk and business risk. A recessional market would widen credit
spread. The analysis independence of different risks would lead to an inaccurate result, thusimpair the preciseness of interest rate for loan.It would be not wise to merge all eight committees into one to manage all risk which will
take away the benefit of independence and balance between committees. However, consideringfinancial risks could be divided into micro and macro categories. It would be practical to mergethe eight committees into two functional committees (Graph 4). The systematic efficiency can beimproved by facilitating interaction between the two committees.
Macro Risk Committee
Group Risk Committee
Board Audit and Risk Committee
Micro Risk Committee
Market Risk
Country Risk
Business Risk (Corporate)
Business Risk (Consumer)
Credit Risk
Reputation Risk
Operational Risk
Compliance Risk
Graph 4: Committee Merge
-
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
15/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
15
Appendix:Table 1.1
ASHAR INDUSTRIES
Income Statement 2002 2003 2004 2005
Revenue 4889 9567 22197 28132
yoy% 96% 132% 27%
D&A 177 331 553 829
yoy% 87% 67% 50%
EBITDA 395 1700 6827 5575
yoy% 330% 302% -18%
EBIT 218 1369 6274 4746
yoy% 528% 358% -24%
Profit before tax -24 1400 6133 4703
yoy% 5733% 338% -23%
Interest Expense -208 -200 -265 -339
yoy% -4% 33% 28%
Net income 49 1182 4701 3365
yoy% 2312% 298% -28%
Minorities 0 35 615 520
Revenue CAGR,year ended 2005 79.20%
Cash Flow
Funds from Operations (FFO) 150 1413 5784 4511
Change in Working Capital 18 -93 -1171 -537Cash from Operations (CFO) 168 1320 4613 3974
Gross CAPEX -108 -421 -898 -1181
Other investment/acquisitions 28 -275 95 -6431
Cash from investing activities -80 -696 -803 -7612
Cash dividend 0 -164 -736 -2092
Free Cash Flow 136 999 3185 2476
Balance Sheet
Cash and equivalents 77 760 2495 2035
Marketable Securities 0 0 1 14
Fixed assets 3035 4654 7562 15539
Total assets 5512 10137 19153 31190
-
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
16/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
16
Short-term debt 262 780 341 252
Long-term debt 2022 2287 1639 8056
Gross debt 2284 3067 1980 8308
Net debt/(cash) 2207 2307 -516 6259
Common equity 1280 2561 5846 10150
Minority interests 0 261 1743 1834
Shareholder's equity 128 2822 7589 11984
Profitability
EBITDA margin 8.10% 17.80% 30.80% 19.80%
yoy% 119.75% 73.03% -35.71%
EBIT margin 4.50% 14.30% 28.30% 16.90%
yoy% 217.78% 97.90% -40.28%
Net margin 1.00% 12.40% 21.20% 12.00%
yoy% 1140.00% 70.97% -43.40%ROE 21.00% 87.90% 111.80% 42.10%
yoy% 318.57% 27.19% -62.34%
Return on capital employed -0.80% 3.40% 7.20% 2.80%
yoy% -525.00% 111.76% -61.11%
Efficiency Ratio 89% 122% 152% 112%
yoy% 37.85% 23.96% -26.26%
Capital Structure
Total debt to common equity 17.84 1.2 0.34 0.82
Net debt to common equity 17.24 0.9 -0.09 0.62Total debt to total assets 41% 30% 10% 27%
Total debt to EBITDA 5.78 1.8 0.29 1.49
Net debt to EBITDA 5.59 1.36 -0.08 1.12
Historic market cap 267 5679 23708 18879
Debt Protection
EBIT to interest expense 1 6.8 23.7 14EBITDA to interest expense(Coverage) 1.9 8.5 25.8 16.4
EBITDA - CAPEX to interest expense 1.4 6.4 22.4 13
Sources of Business Risk
Degree of Operating Leverage 9.11 4.16 4.57
-
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
17/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
17
Degree of Financial Leverage 0.59 0.69 0.65
Degree of Total Leverage 5.35 2.87 2.97
Table 2.2
GATWICK GOLD CORP.
Income Statement 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Revenue 2109 2297 2632 2975 3269
yoy% 9% 15% 13% 10%
D&A 260 409 505 602 590
yoy% 57% 23% 19% -2%
EBITDA 878 642 682 820 235
yoy% -27% 6% 20% -71%
EBIT 618 233 177 219 -354
yoy% -62% -24% 24% -262%
Profit before tax 676 116 -175 127 -428
yoy% -83% -251% -173% -437%
Interest Expense 48 80 99 117 113
yoy% 67% 24% 18% -3%
Net income 515 113 -198 -87 -605
yoy% -78% -275% -56% 595%
Minorities 18 19 23 30 31
CAGR,year ended 2007 11.58%
Cash FlowFunds from Operations (FFO) 525 579 667 1224 1027
Change in Working Capital -64 -121 -112 -129 -176
Cash from Operations (CFO) 461 458 555 1095 851
Gross CAPEX -363 -585 -725 -818 -1021
Other investment/acquisitions 55 -231 -63 57 -38
Cash from investing activities -308 -816 -785 -761 -1059
Cash dividend -328 -205 -165 -135 -149
Free Cash Flow 348 -184 -530 -432 -1212
Balance Sheet
Cash and equivalents 503 288 210 496 493
Marketable Securities 0 26 8 0 0
Fixed assets 2753 5870 5911 6065 6672
Total assets 4838 8176 8303 8961 9747
-
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
18/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
18
Short-term debt 350 318 188 59 337
Long-term debt 804 1282 1708 1426 1522
Gross debt 1154 1600 1896 1485 1858
Net debt/(cash) 651 1286 1678 989 1365
Common equity 1621 3142 2617 2990 2362
Minority interests 53 58 59 62 63
Shareholder's equity 1674 3199 2676 3053 2424
Profitability
EBITDA margin 41.60% 27.90% 25.90% 27.60% 7.20%
-32.93% -7.17% 6.56% -73.91%
EBIT margin 29.30% 10.10% 6.70% 7.30% -10.80%
-65.53% -33.66% 8.96% -247.95%
Net margin 24.40% 4.90% -7.50% -2.90% -18.50%
-79.92% -253.06% -61.33% 537.93%ROE 33.50% 5.10% -7.30% -3.10% -23.00%
-84.78% -243.14% -57.53% 641.94%
Efficiency Ratio 43.59% 35.30% 31.94% 34.46% 34.95%
-19.02% -9.51% 7.89% 1.40%
Capital Structure
Total debt to common equity 0.71 0.51 0.72 0.5 0.79
Net debt to common equity 0.4 0.41 0.64 0.33 0.58
Total debt to total assets 23.85% 19.57% 22.84% 16.57% 19.06%
Total debt to EBITDA 1.31 2.49 2.78 1.81 7.89
Net debt to EBITDA 0.74 2 2.46 1.21 5.8
Historic market cap 10467 9311 13103 13045 11848
Debt Protection
EBIT to interest expense 12.9 2.9 1.8 1.9 -3.1
EBITDA to interest expense (Coverage) 18.3 8.1 6.9 7 2.1
EBITDA - CAPEX to interest expense 10.7 0.7 -0.4 0 -7
Sources of Business Risk
Degree of Operating Leverage 5.18 12.02 14.16 -46.25
Degree of Financial Leverage 0.41 -0.06 -0.19 -0.66
Degree of Total Leverage 2.14 -0.77 -2.69 30.34
-
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
19/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
19
Exhibit 2 Internal Credit Grades (by Probability of Default, PD)9
CorporateGrades
Mid-Point PD PD Range S&P mapping:
(Basis points) Lower Upper Corporate
1A 1 0 1.5 AAA
1B 2 1.5 2.5 AA+
2A 3 2.5 3.5 AA
2B 4 3.5 4.5 AA-
3A 5 4.5 6 A+
3B 7 6 8 A
4A 9 8 11 A-
4B 13 11 17 BBB+
5A 22 17 30 BBB+
5B 39 30 43 BBB-
6A 51 43 59 BB+6B 67 59 77
7A 89 77 102 BB
7B 117 102 135
8A 154 135 175 BB-
8B 203 175 235
9A 267 235 305 B+
9B 361 305 400
10A 462 400 530 B
10B 606 530 700
11A 801 700 920 B-
11B 1054 920 1200
9Mikes, 22.
-
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
20/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
20
Exhibit 1a Wellfleet Bank - Segmentation by Business Line ($million)
2004 2005 2006
$ % $ % $ %Pre-tax Profit
Consumer Banking 1,058 47 1,273 47.5 1,322 41.5
Wholesale Banking 1,175 52.2 1,444 53.9 1,849 58.1
Corporate Items Not Allowed 18 0.8 (36) -1.3 7 0.2
TOTAL 2,251 100% 2,681 100% 3,178 100%Assets Employed
Consumer Banking 38,094 25.9 74,134 34.5 86,902 32.6
Wholesale Banking 108,712 73.9 140,464 65.3 178,688 67.1
Items Not Allocated 318 0.2 498 0.2 512 0.1
TOTAL 147,124 100% 215,096 100% 266,102 100%
Exhibit 1b Wellfleet Bank - Balance Sheet ($million)
2004 2005 2006
Tot Adv to Customers 73899.06 113522 141508Loans & Mortgages 72017.12 117791 139330Total Assets 147120.2 215096 266047
-
7/25/2019 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank (1)
21/21
Group 4 Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about Megadeals
21
Total Deposits 85090.78 119931 147382Total Liabilities 137051.4 202763 248650Total Shareholder's Equity 10068.74 12333 17397Shares Outstanding 1179 1316 1384Book Value per Share 7.4 9.03 12.18Tangible Book Value per Share 5.41 5.74 7.74
Exhibit 1c Wellfleet Bank - Income Statement ($million)
2004 2005 2006
Net Interest Income Loss Provisions 2966.12 4078 4776Operating Profit (Loss) 2317.53 2731 3195Pre-tax income 2249 2681 3178Income before XO Items 1619 1971 2354Net Profit (Loss) 1577 1946 2278Basic EPS before Abnormal Item 1.3 1.51 1.1Diluted EPS 1.27 1.47 1.67Dividends per Share 0.57 0.64 0.71
Return on Common Equity 19.63 18.6 15.86