riki merrick, aphl anna orlova, phd, phdsc lise stevens, fda nikolay lipskiy, md, drph, mba – cdc...
TRANSCRIPT
The Standards and Interoperability Framework Public Health-Reporting Initiative
Establishing collaboration on harmonization of standards for electronic public health reporting
Riki Merrick, APHLAnna Orlova, PhD, PHDSC
Lise Stevens, FDANikolay Lipskiy, MD, DrPH, MBA – CDC
CSTE Conference June 5th, 2012
The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of CDC , FDA or APHL.
About ONC S&I Framework
Office of the Chief Scientist
National Coordinator for Health IT
Office of Economic Analysis & Modeling
Office of the Chief Privacy Officer
Deputy National Coordinator for
Operations
Deputy National Coordinator for
Programs & Policy
Office of Policy & Planning
Office of Standards & Interoperability
Office of Provider Adoption Support
Office of State & Community Programs
• The Standards and Interoperability (S&I) Framework is a forum –enabled by integrated functions, processes, and tools – for implementers and experts to achieve harmonized interoperability for healthcare information exchange
• It represents one investment and approach adopted by the Office of Standards & Interoperability to fulfill its charge of enabling harmonized interoperability specifications to support national health outcomes and healthcare priorities, including Meaningful Use, the Nationwide Health Information Network, etc.
ONC S&I Framework
Source: http://wiki.siframework.org/S%26I+Framework+Functions
ONC S&I Framework
Every S&I Initiative focuses on a single challenge Using a set of value-creating goals and outcomes Creating of content, technical specifications and
reusable tools and services Enhance efficiency, quality and effectiveness of
the delivery of healthcare
Growing number of S&I initiatives since 2011
http://wiki.siframework.org
PHRI - Origins and Focus
ORIGIN: Public Health Reporting Initiative (PHRI) first community led initiative grew out of the Laboratory Reporting Initiative
FOCUS: Provider-Initiated Reports of Individual-level
Electronic Health Records (EHR) information to Public Health Agencies
…as opposed to Query of EHRsHarmonization / alignment of data elements across
different Public Health Agencies (domain specific)
http://wiki.siframework.org/Public+Health+Reporting+Initiative
Provider EHR Local/State/Federal PH
Provider - Initiated Report
PHRI - Goals
Reduce variability in data exchange specifications across public health programs and jurisdictions
Improve interoperability and data exchange between healthcare and public health
Reduce burden on senders Reduce burden on public health to receive,
extract, translate, load and analyze
Core date elements for most ready PH programs possibly by Stage 3 (October 2015; testing 2012)
Possibly after Stage 3 (later phase of initiative)
PHRI – Workgroup Statistics
Over 100 members from a wide variety of stakeholder organizations:
Federal/State PH reporting programs Standards Development Organizations Vendors Professional Associations
Five (5) co-leads, Two (2) Liaisons for Stakeholder Communications and Outreach, Two (2) Facilitators and an ONC Liaison
Bi-Weekly meetings (Wednesdays 4-5P EST)
http://wiki.siframework.org/Public+Health+Reporting+Initiative
PHRI - Approach
Over 30 user stories contributed from local, state and Federal agencies and from PH associations
Identify Core data elements for all reports
Harmonize data elements to simplify reporting process
Created 5 domains: Communicable disease Chronic disease Newborn/Child health Adverse event reporting Infrastructure/quality/research (not in first phase)
http://wiki.siframework.org/PH+Reporting+User+Stories#User Stories
PHRI – User stories already in MU
Immunization reporting to immunization registries (MU stage 1)
Electronic laboratory reporting of reportable condition lab results (MU stage 1)
Syndromic surveillance reports (MU stage 1)
Cancer registry reports (proposed MU stage 2)
PHRI - In Scope
Describing stakeholders, actors, triggers
ID core data elements
Harmonize vocabularies
Analyze existing standards (e.g., HL7 2.5.1 or Clinical Document Architecture (CDA))
OUT OF SCOPE (among other things): Defining reportable events in a jurisdiction Extensive bi-directional communication (beyond
acknowledgments) Defining transport protocols
PHRI - Deliverables
PHRI - Charter – Completed
User Stories - Completed• Domain specific • Consolidated across
Domains
Use Case – Completed Data Element
Harmonization Profile – June• Domain specific• Consolidated for
Common Core Elements across Domains
User Story Readiness Assessment – June
Functional Requirement Analysis and Standards Selection – June
Technical Specification (Implementation Guide) – August
Pilots – September
PHRI - Discoveries
Data mapping/harmonization: Defining core common data elements for PH and
mapping to EHR data model – most of them exist already! Adding data elements to MU stage 3, if required
• occupational data elements, smoking status value sets Modeling PH data elements to clinical care using Federal
Health Information Model (FHIM) Reconciling PH programs
• Occupational data elements use across programs• Different stages of readiness of the programs
PHRI - Next Steps
Assessment of potential readiness of user stories by Stage 3 of Meaningful
Selection of appropriate message/document format(s)
Creation of Implementation Guide
Reference implementation and pilot test
Consideration by HIT Standards Committee (4th Qtr)
Phase 1 Phase 2
User Story / Use Case Development
Phase 1 Phase 2
2/29 3/14 3/28 4/11 4/25 5/9 5/232/152/11/171/3
Standards Analysis and Selection; Data Dictionary; DAM
Pilot Readiness Assessment
6/6 6/20 7/4 7/18 8/1 8/15
Implementation Guide Development
Public Comment
Public Comment - CLOSED
Public Comment
Communication / Outreach
Functional Requirements / Data Element Requirements / IE Requirements
PHRI – Use Case /Standards Harmonization / Specification
You Are Here
Courtesy of John Stinn
Phase 1 (September-December 2011)
• Charter has been finalized • All participants work together on - assessment of needs for the
process - building a consensus on public health reporting definitions - building a consensus on a scope of
the Public Health Reporting HIT Standardization Framework
- development of criteria and selection use cases
- defining a list of WGs• Forming workgroups and starting
assessment of existing artifacts in a scope of the initiative
• Development of detailed work plan
Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sept Oct
Initiation
PHRI - Roadmap
2011
2012
User Story Validation Use
Case Documentation
FR / Modeling
Stds Harm
Phase 2 & 3(January-May; May - October)
• Harmonization of selected use cases into a single use case
• Identification of core data elements and data classes
• Working on harmonization of FHA and segment enterprise architecture for public health reporting
• Working on terminology• Identification and Harmonization of
vocabulary / content Exchange Standards• Development of implementation
documentation • Completion of assessment of business
process, policy barriers• Open source reference implementation• Pilot Demonstration
Spec Develop.
Reference Implementatio
n Pilot
Evaluation for
Certification
Courtesy of John Stinn
Questions?
For current status and to participate, visit the wiki:
http://wiki.siframework.org/Public+Health+Reporting+Initiative
To contact the speaker:[email protected]