rights to animal genetic resources report of an international workshop world trade institute,...
TRANSCRIPT
Rights to Animal Genetic Resources Report of an International Workshop
World Trade Institute, University of Berne,
Switzerland; 27-28 November 2008
Susette Biber-Klemm, Dr. iur. MAESenior Research Fellow WTI
Overview
Introduction Background to the workshop Goals and method Questions, presentations, learnings Conclusions and questions Outlook
219.04.23
INTRODUCTION
319.04.23
419.04.23
Who we are
Center of advanced studies and a forum for interdisciplinary research and teaching in international trade law and economics,
To develop innovative, concrete policy recommen-dations that reflect a better balance between economic and other regulatory objectives.
IP 9 Biotechnology Thomas Cottier, Susette Biber-Klemm: Lead
Michelangelo Temmerman, Sufian Jusoh, Michael Burkard, Cintia Busset
519.04.23
Funded by SDC
BACKGROUND
619.04.23
719.04.23
State of the World’s AnGRFA
Diversity of FAnGR Sustainable use Food security Equity and fairness
GPA: Strategic Priority Area 4Policies, Institutions, Capacity Building
819.04.23
Framework for exchange of animal genetic resources among countries:
a.Role of intellectual property rights b.Fair and equitable exchangec.Rights of indigenous and local communities/ Pastoralists
Terminology of the debate: examples
919.04.23
• Access and benefit sharing• Rights to traditional knowledge • Livestock Keepers Rights• Animal Breeders Rights• Patents• Intellectual Property Rights
WORKSHOP: GOAL AND METHOD
1019.04.23
Goal
At the interface of AnGRFA, trade and property rights:
take stock of current developments and debates;
identify core questions and further research needs.
1119.04.23
Workshop: Method
Inter- and transdisciplinary approach
Presentations by experts from different fields disciplines
microbiology, animal husbandry, agriculture, economics, law
affiliation academia, technical colleges, government agencies, IGOs, NGOs
1219.04.23
OVERVIEW OVER PRESENTATIONS AND LEARNINGS
1319.04.23
The Sessions: overview
Characteristics of Animal Breeding Animal Breeding and Biotechnology Legal Implications Changes to the Legal Framework?
1419.04.23
1519.04.23
Learnings The terminology needs to be clarified
What is a breeder? What is „traditional“, what is „modern“ breeding? Types of „breeding“ (Industrial; farmer‘s BO; indigenous?) Analogies, similarities, differences
Indigenous breeding systems and traditional european systems (BO) are comparable in various elements
Selection (but different technologies, criteria) Integration of breeding results in transfer of property Record keeping (mental vs. written)
1619.04.23
Learnings (continued)
There are essential differences between animal and plant breeding, access, transfer Genetic variation Transfer of results of breeding
The flow of AnGR is at present N-N and N-S. S-N flow might be increasing Search for „lost genes“: adaptation, quality, disease
resistance Facilitated by new technologies
1719.04.23
1819.04.23
Learnings Genetic engineering/ modern technology is used
in breeding technologies
Selection (markers assisted, genomics, protoeomics
reproduction technologiesAI, semen sexing, cloning
Successful gene transfer and cloning are for a rather distant future.
Effects of technologies Improve efficiency of selection programmes (quality, time)
Facilitate transfer of genetic information
Risk to widen the N-S technology gap
Risk to lead to a narrowing of the genetic base 19
2019.04.23
Learnings A great variety of Intellectual Property Rights are
used in AnGRFA Trade marks, geographical indications, trade secrets,
copyrights; patents
There is no sui-generis Animal Breeders‘ Right Patents are granted for processes and products
In AnGRFA so far no patenting of animals Patenting of technologies (selection, breeding) Concentration in breeding industry is to a vast degree
due to trade secrets
2119.04.23
2219.04.23
CONCLUSIONS AND QUESTIONS
2319.04.23
Some preliminary conclusions There are essential differences in animal and plant
breeding. Some analogies (in procedures) might be possible, but different approaches in substance are needed.
Genetic variation in animals is owned by the holder of the animal; the genetic value is included in the market price.
Exchange of genetic information (mainstream breeds) works on private basis and is running smoothly.
Specific solutions might be needed for local rare/ indigenous breeds (with qualities valuable at larger scale)
2419.04.23
Conclusions (continued) Breeding industry is an economic enterprise in a
free and competitive market. The same is true for trade in reproductive
materials. Legal obligations pro diversity of products would
be difficult to achieve. Other ways, means to balance negative impacts
must be found.
2519.04.23
Some Questions
Balancing concentration processes by diversity through participatory breeding What would be the (legal) means to strengthen
participatory breeding/ local breeding organisations?
Balancing genetic uniformity through sui-generis Intellectual Property Rights Is a disclosure obligation in a sui generis intellectual
property right (animal breeders right) a (long-term) alternative to trade secrets?
2619.04.23
Questions (continued)
Specific solutions for rare/indigenous breeds and associated TK Can registration of rare/indigenous breeds form a
basis for ABS (in analogy to TK)?
Is specific protection for TK needed. Can participation, registration, protection of TK be
bundled into a sui-generis (intellectual) (property) right?
2719.04.23
Questions (continued)
What can be left to the private actors; what needs to be regulated, managed by the state?
What incentives can be created to maintain and sustainably use AngRFA diversity?
What can be regulated on the national level, where is an international regulation needed?
Which would be the adequate negotiation/ regulatory body?
2819.04.23
Outlook Workshop Website: Presentations and links to publications
http://www.nccr-trade.org/ip-9-forthcoming/rights-to-animal-genetic-resources-2.html
Preparation of a working paper containingIntroduction
Summary of each presentation
Conclusion
Publication of results Initiate further research in an inter-/ trans- disciplinary team
Create and interdisciplinary team
Working in an stakeholder network
Mandated by an international body (WGAngr; WIPO; ???)
2919.04.23
THANK YOU FOR YOUR QUESTIONS AND YOUR INPUT
3019.04.23
http://www.nccr-trade.org/ip-9-forthcoming/rights-to-animal-genetic-resources-2.html