rights / license: research collection in copyright - non ... · depth,and3.5mlength,fig. 1....
TRANSCRIPT
Research Collection
Doctoral Thesis
Mean roughness coefficient in open channels with differentroughnesses of bed and side walls
Author(s): Yassin, Ahmed Mostafa
Publication Date: 1953
Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-000099176
Rights / License: In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted
This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For moreinformation please consult the Terms of use.
ETH Library
Prom. No. 2267
Mean Roughness Coefficient
in Open Channels with Different Roughnessesof Red and Side Walls
THESIS
PRESENTED TO
THE SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
ZURICH
FOR THE DEGREE OF
DOCTOR OF TECHNICAL SCIENCES
BY
Ahmed Mostafa Yassin, M. E.
of Cairo, Egypt
Accepted on the recommendation of
Prof. Dr. E. Meyer-Peter and Prof. Dr. R. Miiller
1Zurich 1953
Dissertationsdruckerei Leemann AG
Erscheint als Mitteilung Nr. 27
der Versuchsanstalt fiir Wasserbau und Erdbau
an der Eidgenossischen Technischen Hoohschule in Zurich
Herausgegeben von Prof. G. Schnitter
Verlag Leemann Zurich
TO MY WIPE
Leer - Vide - Empty
Acknowledgement
The writer wishes to express his thanks and sincere gratitudeto Prof. Dr. E. Meyer-Peter, for his valuable help and advice duringthe preparation of this thesis.
The writer is also grateful to Dr. A. Preissmann for his help.
Leer - Vide - Empty
Index
Symbols and abbreviations 7
I. Introduction 9
II. The model and the measuring apparatus 10
1. The model 10
2. The measuring apparatus 13
III. Fundamental equations for turbulent flow and uniform roughnessof bed and side walls 16
1. General equation of Darcy 16
2. Strickler'a equation 17
IV. The procedure of work 18
1. Experimental details and velocity distribution curves .... 18
2. The value of a 38
3. The energy line gradient Je 40
V. Mean roughness coefficient at different roughnesses of bed and
side walls 42
1. H. A. Einstein's equation based on Strickler's formula....
42
2. Another equation based on Darcy'a formula 44
3. A second hm equation 44
VI. Results and discussion 45
VII. Determination of the shearing stress on side walls and bed from
the velocity distribution 69
VIII. Summary 89
References 90
5
Leer - Vide - Empty
Symbols and Abbreviations
h depthb width
A area
P wetted perimeter, for a rectangular cross section = b + 2h
R Chezy's hydraulic radius =
-p
v velocityto written as index at the right hand side of a symbol, as vm or
symbolize an average value within a regionA ze loss of energy head
A zw drop in water level
y specific weight, weight of a cubic unit of fluid
p density, mass per cubic unit of fluid
g acceleration of gravity
7} viscosityv kinematic viscosity-n -r, it t
velocity X diameter of pipe vDR„ Reynolds number = ^—^—-.—;
,^
^ ^=—
e J kinematic viscosity v
r, , t-x , -, , velocity X hydraulic radius v RR. Reynolds number = r^—f-.—; ^
=—
6 J kinematic viscosity v
I, A I lengthQ discharge, volume of bulk flow per unit time
y vertical distance from the bed
x horizontal distance from the side wall
Log decimal logarithmD the diameter of a pipeh StricMer's roughness coefficient
hw StricMer's, roughness coefficient of the side walls
kft StricMer's, roughness coefficient of the bed of the channel
A Darcy's roughness coefficient in the general formula
Je energy line gradient
Jw water surface gradient
Js bed gradienta a correction factor to compensate for the use of the mean
velocity in calculating the velocity head
£ the ratio of the discharge measured at the flow nozzle to that
calculated from the mean velocity distribution curve
P correction factor for flow nozzle measurement
s the roughness height parameter, absolute roughness
drelative roughness
t0 shearing stress between the wall and the fluid
t0s shearing stress between the bed and the fluid
t0 shearing stress between the side walls and the fluid
v# the Prandtl "friction velocity" = l/—
u symbol refers to upstreamd symbol refers to downstream
T temperature of water
Abbreviations
SBZ. Schweizerische BauzeitungS.I.A. Schweizerischer Ingenieur- und Architektenverein
VDI Verein Deutscher Ingenieure
8
I. Introduction
All the old laws of friction put forward by Chezy, Darcy, Strickler
and other hydraulic engineers were given for uniform roughness of
the whole surface of closed or open conduits. But, as far as I know,
nobody had tried to carry out experiments on this special problemof getting the mean roughness coefficient in open channels in case
bed and side walls are of different roughnesses. H. A. Einstein
determined an equation [l]1) concerning this problem based on
Strickler's formula [2] making some special assumptions, but, no¬
body had tried to verify this equation.The principal aim of this work was to verify the equation of
Einstein or to find another equation which may be used with
sufficient accuracy in both field and laboratory experiments. As the
ratio between the depth and width of the open channels differs
widely in both cases, as it is small in most of the existing rivers and
canals, and relatively big in many experiments, three channels
were examined:
Channel I
100 cm wide and 35 cm deep. The measured
water depth varied between 4.99 cm and 32.20 cm
discharge varied between 17.22 lit/sec and 319.80 lit/sec
Reynolds number i?/ between 13430 and 174700 (RJ = ^-\Perforated steel plates were used as artificial roughness.
Channel II
50 cm wide and 35 cm deep. The measured
water depth varied between 4.81 cm and 33.64 cm
x) Figures between brackets [ ] indicate references.
9
discharge varied between 7.56 lit/sec and 153.50 lit/sec
Reynolds number Re' between 10810 and 114470
Perforated steel plates were used as artificial roughness.
Channel III
60 cm wide and 60 cm deep. The measured
water depth varied between 4.71 cm and 57.72 cm
discharge varied between 6.90 lit/sec and 388.70 lit/sec
Reynolds number Re' between 8000 and 191550
Rounded gravel having diameter = 4.0 mm to 11.7 mm fixed in
place with cement was used as artificial roughness.
In each channel the following cases were examined:
a) (la, IIa, Ilia) both bed and side walls smooth,
b) (lb, lib, IIIb) bed rough and side walls smooth,
c) (Ic, lie, IIIc) both bed and side walls rough.In channel III the following case was also examined,
d) (Hid) bed smooth and side walls rough.In channels I and II the bed and side walls were made smooth
by the help of white putty, but in channel III only cement was
used because of the cold weather.
It may be important to note here that the flow was always
streaming flow as the water depth was always greater than the
critical depth. The flow was practically uniform as the difference
in depth upstream and downstream was not greater than 0.2 mm.
Also the flow was turbulent. Supposing that according to Krey [3]we leave the transition region at RJ ^ 1500 to 6000, and seeing that
the minimum Re' calculated in our measurements was 8000, we can
say that our flow was always fully turbulent.
II. The Model and the Measuring Apparatus
1. The Model
It consists of three main parts:A. the inlet, B. the channel, C. the outlet.
10
modifications.
its
and
model
The
1.
Fig.
2m
I0
OS
IC-C
Section
mj[c
hann
elPlan
Part
D-0
Section
—-^^^^^S*«H
Rete
inin
q'
.—r
wall
Concrete
hosm
os.
m>.
/]
:„
,.
plates
Concrete
8-B
Section
n)(C
hann
elPlan
Part
Profit!
e7
"
-'hi—-.--4"--"I-,
om—
--39
us-—i
(.mati.-
A. The inlet
A basin of a rectangular cross section 1.12 m clear width, 2.25 m
depth, and 3.5 m length, Fig. 1. The water is introduced by two pipesof 25 cm diameter each. Each pipe has 17 cm diameter flow nozzle
connected to a differential manometer to allow the measurement
of the discharge which is regulated by a special valve.
To ensure smooth water surface in the channel the followingprecautions were used:
a) a half, brick wall spaced 80 cm from the inlet, 75 cm high to
diminish the energy of the entering water,
b) a horizontal steel screen at the top of this wall,
c) a vertical steel screen fixed at this wall,
d) a vertical steel screen at about the middle of the inlet basin,
e) a sloped steel screen just before the channel,
and at the entrance of the channel,
f) a sloped steel screen which was made free to move at first, but
later on, it was found more convenient to fix it to get better
velocity distribution in profile 7 (7 m from the beginning of the
channel),
g) a floating timber screen 1 m long in channel I, and 2 m long in
the two other channels.
Two 5 cm diameter pipes were provided to help to empty the
inlet basin.
B. The channel
It consists of 11 separate rectangular part channels, each 4 m
long, 1 m clear width, 0.40 m depth, giving a total length of 44 m.
Each channel was supported at the joints on broad flanged I beams
imbedded in concrete foundations spaced 4 m from each other. The
joints allow the expansion or contraction of the channels due to
change of temperature and were made water tight.After fixing the channel straight and horizontal it was given a
slope of 1 °/00 using cement mortar. This 1 °/00 slope made a loss of
more than 5 cm in the usefull depth of the channel.
When the bed surface was smoothened by cement it was found
that the bed was smoother than the side walls, so both side walls
12
and bed were covered with white putty to have them equallysmooth.
To facilitate measurements of velocity, water and bed levels,
three portions of rails were set up, the first between 4 metres from
the inlet and metre 11, the second from metre 19 to 27, and the
third from metre 36 to 41. Further, a small carriage rolled on each
portion. The brass rails of rectangular cross section 5x15 mm were
fixed on small brass supports (of a T section with a groove in the
middle just bigger than the width of the rail) imbedded in cement and
spaced 30 cm from each other. The rails were free to move as a
precaution against the change of temperature. An attempt was made
to fix all the rails horizontally at the same level. The differences in
level between the separate portions were exactly measured. Each
of the three carriages rolled on three rollers the diameter of which
were adapted till each carriage was exactly horizontal and all
carriages were at the same level.
C. The outlet
A basin 5.05 m in length and 1.12 m clear width. A sluice gate
having a vertical scale was placed 4 m from the end of the channel
to allow the regulation of the water level in the channel. The water
flows only over the gate.
2. The Measuring Apparatus
a) Discharge
The discharge was measured by the help of two flow nozzles,
each in one of the two inlet conduits, one connected to an air-water
differential manometer, and the other connected to a mercury-
water differential manometer, both of the [7-tube type.The two flow nozzles used were constructed according to the
VDI specifications [4]. A length of at least 50 D upstream and 10 D
downstream from the nozzle"must be kept free from disturbances.
We can get the discharge by applying the formula:
Q = pA2i2gTAh (1)
13
in which Q is the discharge, /? is the discharge coefficient (taken
according to the VDI specifications), A2 is the area of the nozzle
mouth, and Ah is the difference in pressure head in the conduit
immediately upstream and downstream from the nozzle.
Each inlet conduit can supply about 200 lit/sec, but, if the
required discharge was less than 200 lit/sec, the conduit connected
to the air-water manometer was always used as the reading of A h
is much easier due to the higher water columns.
b) Velocity distribution
It was measured by the Pitot-tube, Prandtl type, Fig. 2 and 3 [5].Prandtl devised an instrument [6] in which the pressure openingsare so located that the slight decrease in pressure due to the highervelocity around the nose of the tube is exactly offset by the rise in
pressure caused by the reduction in velocity ahead of the stem of
the instrument; thus the instrument is given a coefficient of unity.The diameter D of the instrument used in channels I and II is
0.92 cm, with a total height of 60 cm. As it was not sufficient for
channel III (the water depth was much bigger), another instrument
pt d izzz p*
:o.so
a-b t>i
Fig. 2. The Pitot-tube, Prandtl type.
14
with a height of 96 cm and D = 1.24 cm was used. The instrument
was connected to a special E7-type differential manometer havingtwo sliding indicators with mirrors. One side of the manometer
indicates the static pressure ps and the other the dynamic pressure,
or let us say, the total pressure pt. The velocity can be calculated
from the formula.
t, = 2flr"|MzZk (2)
Fig. 3. The measuring apparatus, the Pitot-tube, the point gauge and the
hook-gauge well.
15
Both pressures ps and pt change with the increase of the angle 6
which the stem of the instrument may make with the direction of
flow. Prandtl found that the difference pt—ps practically remains
constant till 0 = 17°.
c) Bed and water levels
Bed level was measured by an ordinary point gauge, Fig. 3,
supported on the sliding carriage, and could be transported from
carriage to carriage. The gauge was mounted on a graduated rod
actuated by a slow-motion screw equipped with a vernier for
accurate readings to 0.1 mm. At the beginning, this point gauge
was also used to measure the water level, but later, it was found
inconvenient for big water depths due to the big oscillation of the
water surface. To overcome this difficulty, two side hook gauge
wells were constructed at both measuring profiles. Each was connec¬
ted with a short pipe 5 mm clear diameter to the axis of the bed of
the channel, and had a hook gauge with a vernier for accurate
readings to 0.1 mm, with the same mechanism as the point gauge.
The oscillation was then much smaller and slower in the wells which
gave much more accurate readings of the water level. Each time we
have to move the hook gauge with the oscillation of the water level
in the well and take x maximum readings and x minimum readings,(x^lO), then compute the average value of these 2x readings.The zero point for each well was accurately fixed.
III. Fundamental Equations for Turbulent Flow and Uniform
Roughness of bed and side walls
1. General equation of Darcy
In 1858 Darcy published the following equation which was very
useful to hydraulics:
Je = -yr— for circular pipes (3)
16
for other cross sections we have to replace the term D (the diameter
of the pipe) with the hydraulic radius, and so we come to the form:
J°=ll^ (4)
or A = i?Je|f (5)
From dimensional considerations it is known that the dimensionless
coefficient A is only a function of the Reynolds number Re' and of
the relative roughness p.For high values of Reynolds number and
rough flow it was found by experiment that A depends only on the
relative roughness. So, A is not a constant characteristic of the
surface.
2. StricMer's Equation
In 1923 A. Strickler from Switzerland, independently from
Manning, published what he called a practical and convenient
equation for the mean flow velocity [2]:
vm = kiri.je1i' (6)
This equation was given for fully turbulent rough flow with the
assumption that k is a function of the absolute roughness of the
surface of the walls of pipe or channel, independent of the Reynoldsnumber.
,const
, . ._.
k = ^^- |*| =m (7)
is
In the metric system the dimension of \k\ is m!'jsec.It was found by experiment that this equation did not act
totally right in our case. In Fig. 26, 27 and 28, in which k is drawn
against h the curves rise to a certain limit and then begin to fall
again instead of either going further up or keeping horizontal. It is
possible that we are in the transition zone to rough flow because k
was shown as function of the Reynolds number at least for small
depth.
17
IV. The Procedure of Work
1. Experimental details and velocity distribution curves
(Fig. 5-17)
The first step was to get a smooth water surface for big discharges.That was attained by using a group of screens as mentioned before.
The arrangements of the screens had a big influence on the velocitydistribution near the inlet. This can be easily seen from curves
3 and 4 in Pig. 9. Curve 4 was measured when the steel screen at the
entrance of the channel was free to move and the timber floating
Fig. 4. Velocity distribution in 6 horizontal sections, profile 39, case la,
h= 10.18 cm.
18
screen was only one meter long. After fixing the steel screen and
replacing the floating screen by another two metres long the
velocity distribution was measured again (curve 3) and found to be
much better.
To choose the measuring profiles, the velocity distribution was
measured in different cross sections. Each cross section was divided
into 6, 7, 8 or 9 horizontal sections (depending on the water depth)and for each horizontal section the velocity was measured usingthe Pitot-tube for channel I, in 6 points chosen according to the
S.I.A. specifications [7] (11 points in channel II and 13 points in
channel III) as shown in Fig. 4. From the horizontal velocitydistribution curves we can draw the mean vertical velocity distri¬
bution curve, the area of which if multiplied by the channel's width
will give the discharge. The ratio of the discharge measured at the
flow nozzle to that calculated from the mean velocity distribution
curve, which we call £, gives an idea of the accuracy of Pitot-
tube and flow nozzle measurements. The deviation of this ratio
from unity was generally found to be smaller than 1%.The mean velocity distribution curves in different profiles for
channel I can be seen in Fig. 5 and 6. For each curve h, Q, a. 2), £ and
Re' are given. As it is better to have a long measuring length, the
first measuring profile must be as near as possible to the inlet and
the other as near as possible to the outlet, and in the same time both
profiles must have a normal velocity distribution curve and a
reasonable <x value. It was found that the most convenient measuring
profiles were profiles 7 and 39 (9 and 39 in channel III).In each of the ten cases the velocity distribution was measured
in profile 39 at three different depths. The velocity distribution
near the inlet (profile 7 or 9) was measured at three different depths,
only for the case of totally smooth channel (la, IIa and Ilia). The
mean velocity distribution curve at the inlet is more or less vertical,
but in profile 39 tends to be curved. The character of the velocitydistribution can be judged on the basis of the correction factor a
(eqn. 13). The value of a upstream is smaller than that downstream.
2) a = correction factor to compensate for the use of the mean velocityin calculating the velocity head, see page 38.
19
0.25 0.50 0.75 vm in m/sec
Case la
Curve Profilecm
h
cm
a
Lit/seca. I *;
1 7 99 95 10.06 ess J. 038 0.999 S5 370
2 7 99 95 20.18 lee.e 1.016 1.002 lit ISO
) 6 99.86 20.3? 187.7 1 035 0.998 133 S90
« — 19 99.99 10M 188.3 1025 1.008 133 700
5 26 100.2 20.32 188.7 i.oa 0.8S8 133 980
Fig. 5. Mean velocity distribution curves in different profiles, case la.
20
25
20
10
-A2
/ / /
0.25 0.50 0.75 I'm in m/sec 1.0 1.15
Case la Curve h
cm
Q
Lit/seca i r>i
Profile 39 1 W.IB 67.2 I. Oil I.OOS IS 860
1 4 = 99.95 2 20.fi 187.7 1.038 1.006 133 320
3 29.7S 319.3 1.026 0.989 I7t 0*0
Fig. 6. Three mean velocity distribution curves in profile 39, case la.
21
3
i
\
J j11
0 0.25 0.50 0.75 vm in m/sec 1.0
Case lbCurve h
cm
Q
Lit/sectt 4 R>
Profile 39 1 9.97 52.40 ;.<?*« 0.985 17120
1 b' 98.95 2 19.51 ISO.oo 1.0*2 0.999 919W
S 29.91 273 SO l.03li 0.994 US 300
Fig. 7. Three mean velocity distribution curves in profile 39, case lb.
22
0.25 0.50 0.75 vminm/sec loo
Case IcProfile 59
|| ..«, ||
Curve h
cm
Q
Lit/seca I He
1 9.95 52.10 Wit 0.96S 37IS0
2 20M IU9.00 I.0S1 0.9)7 S0S70
3 29.S7 259.30 t.ou 0.868 13$ 270
Fig. 8. Three mean velocity distribution curves in profile 39, case Ic.
23
4
3 %
• 1
-
2
1
/ M
/ P *
——-*r^L-ca3-*'
P •
/ /
/ /
/ /
0 0.25 0.50 0.75 vmi„m/sec 1.0
Case Ha Curvehcm
aLit/sec
a. i Re'
Profile 7 l 10.1$ 10.92 I.01S 0 978 leoso
2 20.43 80.80 1.0it 0.990 77 no
16=50.263 3S.S6 150.70 1.022 0.99S III $30
4 11.72 ISO AO 1.02k 0.977 III 700
Fig. 9. Four mean velocity distribution curves in profile 7, case II a.
J
\\
2
/
0 0.25 0.50 0.75 vm inm/sec 1.0
Case IlaProfile 39
1 b=t9.82 1
Curve h
cm
a
Lit/seca. I Hi
1 I0.1S iO.Bi I.0S6 0.995 38130
2 20S2 80.80 1.051 1.0)5 77330
i ii.62 ISI.VO 1.01,1 0.991 112690
Fig. 10. Three mean velocity distribution curves in profile 39, case Ila.
30
25
20
IS
10
0.25 0.50 0.75 vm in m/iec loo
Case Eh Curve hcm
QOf/sec
a t *i
Profile 391 10.29 26.28 1070 0.972 12110
1 b-if9.82 2 2OA0 71 90 I.0S7 0 936 68 280
3 33.63 HO. 70 1 Oil 0.991 101420
Fig. 11. Three mean velocity distribution curves in profile 39, case lib.
30
S
c
25
20
15
10
0.25 0.50 0.75 vminm/sec loo
Case lie Cum hon
aLit/sec
a. i *.'
Profile 3s 1 10.33 2S.*0> 1.077 0.SB3 30 770
|';6=4S.«jl! 1
Z 20.17 ee.io LOSS 0.592 62*20
3 S0A8 113.to 1.057 0.954 671.20
Fig. 12. Three mean velocity distribution curves in profile 39, case lie.
27
3
1
2
i
\
/
>
) //JJJ
0.25 0.50 0.75 vm in m/sec l.oo
Case Ma Curveft
cm
Q
Lit/sec
a. I Re
Profile 9 1 2012 101 6 1.022 1012 83920
1 0 = 6015 Z 40 36 2S4.3 1.027 l.02i ISH70
3 S7 2S iBSS I 022 1.012 191620
Fig. 13. Three mean velocity distribution curves in profile 9, case Ilia.
28
3
2
/ I /
0.25 0.50 0.75 vm in m/sec loo
CaseHa Curveh
cm
a
Lit/seca 4 «e
Profile 39I 20.12 102.10 1.027 1.009 88(50
1 b=60.0S2 41.00 252.60 1.017 1.017 151170
3 57.50 SBS.oo I.03S 1.021 ISt 250
Fig. 14. Three mean velocity distribution curves in profile 39, case Ilia.
29
60
%
SO
to
10
20
10
0.15 050 0 75 vm in m/sec l.oo
CaseMt Curveh
cm
a
Lit/seca. £ Be
Profile 391 10.14 63.3 1.071 /.CO .5 seioo
1 b'60.0S 2 2./S J04.6 i.oes 0.995 IIS 700
3 53.98 2$l S I.0S7 1.009 itetto
Fig. 15. Three mean velocity distribution curves in profile 39, case Illb.
30
3
\
2
\
\/
0 0.25 0.50'
0.75 vm in m/sec 1.0
Case McProFile 39
I b'602 I
Curve hcm
a
Lit/seca I Re
1 70.28 eo.ss I.I09 0.993 46980
2 iO.tl 111.to 1.097 1.009 84/80
3 5*88 zn.ro 1.097 0.997 96400
Fig. 16. Three mean velocity distribution curves in profile 39, case IIIc.
31
3
\\
2
\
1
0 0.25 0.50 0.75 vminmfiec loo
CaseMdProfile 59
I b'60.2 a
I 1
Curvehcm
QLit/sec
a I «i
1 20.27 80.00 1068 0.398 6*040
2 40.22 I7B.S 1.070 I.OOS WZISO
3 S87Z 262.25 1.076 0.937 117730
Fig. 17. Three mean velocity distribution curves in profile 39, case Hid.
32
Fig. 18. General view of channel I, taken from the downstream, case lb.
In channel I, Pig. 18, the existing channel was used with | = 0.35
In channel II, Fig. 19, a concrete slab was built in the middle of the
channel making ^= 0.7. In channel III, Fig. 20, two concrete
slabs were built 60 cm apart and 60 cm high (-=- = l.o). In channels
I and II perforated steel plates 2 mm thick, with perforations
33
Fig. 19. General view of channel II, taken from the upstream, case lie.
5 mm diameter spaced 7 mm centre to centre, Fig. 21 and 22, were
used as artificial roughness3). In channel III rounded gravel, Fig. 23,
the grain-size distribution curve of which is given in Fig. 24, was
used as artificial roughness. The gravel was cemented to one side of
each of the 44 concrete slabs each 2 m long, with which the side
walls of channel III were built. For bed roughness the gravel was
cemented to concrete slabs 59 X 59.5 cm and 3 cm thick.
s) For further details see pages 9 and 10 and Fig. 1.
34
Fig. 20. General view of channel III, taken from the upstream, case Hid.
To calculate the roughness coefficient the following data were
required: the discharge Q, the water depth at both measuring
profiles hu and hd and A zw. These data were measured at different
depths and repeated at least four times for each depth taking into
consideration that we must have in each case uniform flow, by the
help of the sluice gate at the outlet. As it was very difficult to have
the water depth in the two profiles exactly the same (the difference
35
Fig. 21. The perforated steel plates used as artificial roughness in channels
I and II.
was not bigger than 0.2 mm), it was necessary to apply mean values
for v, h, B, P and A, namely,
depth: m 2 upstream
wetted perimeter:p
Pu + Pd symbol d refers to
m 2 downstream
wetted area:a Au +Adm 2
Hydraulic radius: p _
^w + ^dm p 1 p
ru^~rd
mean velocity:Q
Vm =aT
36
Fig. 22. The channel in case Ic, the carriage and the point gauge.
And so both fundamental equations of Darcy and Strickler must be
written in the following form:
Darcy: X=RmJe^ (8)m
Strickler: k = -^—^ (9)
and as the depth and the velocity are not the same upstreamand downstream we have to make correction for the energy line
gradient.
37
:~*T»mm**L^k «&#-*» t.«mm,w wv„ *jff~» *? -*t wr- vs^r°P^r^Fj[TI^3L**»*&m»>*rj**. #W1^% i^»»Wl \^P
Fig. 23. The gravel used as artificial roughness in channel III.
2. The value of a
As mentioned before a is a factor to compensate for the use of
the mean velocity in calculating the velocity head. The value of a
depends on the shape of the velocity distribution curve. If the latter
is known a can be calculated as follows:
The kinetic energy
Ek = lPjj*dA = «±v3mA (10)
A
thus a = -3^- I I v3dA (11)
A
38
too
.5>
80
60
10
20
by the square-mesh sieve with /
openings of 10mm /
96.66 % passed through /3.34 % retained on the sieve /
100.0 %
8 10
o d in mm (square - mtsh eiere)
12
Fig. 24. Grain-size distribution curve of the rounded gravel used as artificial
roughness in channel III.
at any point, v = vm + Sv, where 8v is the deviation from the mean
value vm [8], so,
uvlA =HvldA + 3Hv*m8vdA + 3$jvm8^dA+ttWdAA A A A
but, according to the definition of the mean value j$8vdA = 0 so that,A
39
AAA
if St; is small, JfSt;3^ will be a very small term that could beA
neglected, and it follows that,
•2dA (12)
for practical purposes, with a good approximation, referring to
equation 11, we can say that,
Zv3AA(13)
3. The Energy Line Gradient Je
According to Bernoulli, see Fig. 25,
*« + *« +- + «»!£ = ** + ha +^ + «*£ + A*e (14)y zg y zg
where p0 is the atmospheric pressure which can be assumed equalin both sections, and a is a correction factor already defined depend¬
ing on the shape of the velocity distribution.
vu = the mean velocity in profile I—I
vd = the mean velocity in profile II—II
Fig. 25.
40
but,
thus,
Aze = Azw +-~ KvJ-ocdv/)
and 4^= J„Aze_ r
Jp. = t4> +2gAl
Al
(«u*\.a-*dt>«ia)
(15)
(16)
As is was found by experiment that the difference between ocu and
ocd is very small, it may be assumed that au = <xd = 1, in such a
case (see the tables in fig. 5 to 17 giving the computed values of a),
Je, — Jw +2gAl
(17)
To get an idea of the percentage error due to this assumption
we have to take two numerical examples, one having the biggestcalculated values of <xM and ad, and the other having the biggestcalculated difference between ad and au, as the error in calculating
Je depends mostly on xd—
<xu and not on the value of <xu or otd itself.
Example 1: Case Ila:
Xu = 1.044 hu = 19.99
ad =1.051 hd = 20.00
cm bu = 50.26
cm bd = 49.82
cm Q =
cm Jw =
78.40 lit/sec1-034 %0
considering a values:
neglecting a values:
with an error of:
Je
1.010%0
1.018%0+ 0.8%
A
0.01434
0.01446
+ 0-8%
k
106.64
106.22
-0.4%
Example 2: Case la:
a„ = 1.016 hu = 20.31
a.d = 1.038 hd = 20.30
cm bu = 99.95
cm bd = 99.95
cm Q =
cm Jw =
189.0 lit/sec1.046 "/oo
considering a values:
neglecting a values:
with an error of:
Je
1.014%
1.046%0+ 3.1%
A
0.01325
0.01366
+ 3.0%
k
106.27
104.66
-1.5%
This shows clearly that the biggest error comes from biggestdifference between <xd and <xu even when their values are small. The
41
error increases also with the increase of the mean velocity. And as
the error will be of the same order of magnitude in the three or four
different cases of roughness arrangements, then the total error in
km or Xjn will be so small that it can be safely neglected.
V. Mean Roughness Coefficient at Different Roughnesses of
Bed and Side Walls
1. H. A. Einstein Equation based on Strickler'a Formula
H. A. Einstein [1] tried to apply Stickler's formula also for the
case where the roughness coefficient along the wetted perimeter is
not constant. He divided the wetted perimeter into n parts Pv P2,... ... Pn having roughness coefficients kv k2, kn and dividingthe whole cross section into n parts with areas Alt Az, An.He assumed that each part has the same mean velocity
vi — which at the same time will be equal to the mean velocity of
the whole cross section vm — and the same energy line gradientJe. Applying the Strickler'B law of friction we get for each part:
Vt =vm = ktRt'i*j;L (18)
Further, vm = kmRi.j;i. for the whole cross section
so,
or.
kmIP' = ktBti'
k '/>R. = R m lift)
We can get now another equation by assuming that the area of each
part At equals the wetted perimeter Pi multiplied by the hydraulicradius Rt,
as A = EAi (20)
and as R =-=-, or, A = PR
Thus, PR = SPt Bt = Rk'i>ZA
42
for a rectangular open channel,
fcm —•*» + *«
K1' K'u
(22)
where Pb — the wetted perimeter of the bed = 6
and Pw = the wetted perimeter of the side walls = 2h
To apply this equation for a case of the bed rough and side walls
smooth at any certain depth h we have to apply kb the value found
by experiment at the same depth h for the case of totally roughchannel, and kw the value found by experiment at the same depth h
for the case of totally smooth channel. The km value computed from
this equation km (theoretical) must be compared with the experi¬mental value km found by experiment at the same depth h for
the case of the channel having bed rough and side walls smooth.
The deviation
equation.
K tc~
K„
gives an idea of the accuracy of the
Example:
For channel III, case bed rough and side walls smooth,
(case IIIc) = 61.826 = 60.1 cm at h =
table 13
Applying the equation,
50 cm,
K„
(case Ilia) = 104.73
(case IIIb) = 82.66
k —
60.1+2X50
60.1+
100
61.82'/. 104.733/'
81.69
deviation81.69-82.66
8X66X 100 =-1.17%
the minus sign means that the theoretical value is smaller than the
experimental value.
43
2. Another equation based on Darcy's formula
As in Darcy's formula the value of A is a function of the relative
roughness and Reynolds number we cannot apply the assumptionof Einstein as we shall have a different relative roughness for each
separate part of the cross section. Any how we can try the following
empirical formula:
K =^ (23)
for a rectangular open channel.
the application is the same as by Einstein's formula.
Example:
For case Illb as above, table 13,
at h = 40 cm A6 (case IIIc) = 0.0366
Xw (case Ilia) = 0.0125
Xmxp (case Illb) - 0.0221
Applying the equation,
. 0.0366X60.1 + 0.0125X2X40nooQ
'W =
lioj= 0-0228
j .-0.0228-0.0221
1AA „ noo.deviation = X 100 =
+3.03%
3. A second Jcm equation
We can also try an empirical equation based on Stickler's
formula with the same form as the above Am equation, namely,
K =^ (25)
for a rectangular open channel,
t. &ft "ft + ^w "w /9R\
44
Example:
For case Illb as above, table 13,
at h = 30 cm kb (case IIIc) = 62.87
kw (case Ilia) = 107.18
kmexp (caselllb)= 76.15
Applying the equation,
. 62.87X60.1 + 107.18X2X30OK nl
.
*W =
12^= 85-01
deviation = 85,°!~~^6,15 x 100 = +11.63%
VI. Results and Discussion
All the experimental datas for the three cases are given in tables
1 to 10. For each channel the following curves are given:
k in function of hm, Fig. 26, 27 and 28,k in function of Bm, Fig. 29, 30 and 31,
A in function of hm, Fig. 32, 33 and 34,
A in function of Bm, Fig. 35, 36 and 37, and
Log (100 A) in function of Log Be', Fig. 38, 39 and 40.
In the last curve both Blasius and Nikuradse,'& curves for smooth [9]and rough pipes [10] are drawn in dotted lines after converting the
values of Log Be to the corresponding values of Log Be'. As for
circular sections
Be' = -5, then Log Re' = Log Re-Log 4 = Log Re-0.6.
In fact we cannot compare between Nikuradse'a curve for rough
pipes and our case as each line of Nikuradse's curve is given for a
constant relative roughness, but in open channels the relative
roughness changes with the change of the hydraulic radius. The
interesting case is that of total smooth channel. In all three cases,
la, IIa and Ilia, our curves go exactly parallel to Blasius line, and
45
9f
OtDtDtOOlOlOlOlOOOOtnOOlOlOOOOWOlOll^
JOS05OTOSOlOlOl*"WWtOtOtOh-0*ktOtOtOH-iH-OU5
r—OlOCOr^OOOOCnrF^tOr-t*05tO-JtO<ltO<OOi05tOOOtD
I—'I—'1—I—'ososoaosoooooooocototOH-osososostotototocototocotoi—'Ooooootooototototocoooooooh-'H-i—ii—iQ lit/seoXHOlHUOGOUtOlCOOCOOlt^l^OHHOWCO^OlWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOiOSOO
pppppppppppppppppppppppp
000O0000OSOSOSO5H^K»-H^>l^h-l-'>-'t-l00000000*>.l^.^.*^O5O5O5OS5O?OCcDOl*^^l^<I^IOS0T^JOlOl01^I0a05Ol
B&
00000000®0!0»0000»-)0>0!aOl^^^^-a^3-J-JtOtOtOtOtOWWWOOOCOC10S050StOtOtOtO<I<IOS»i^hOOWOhO\0!*'COWhNihO)^OW»J
COs
o
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOtO^-rf*-Oi05jf^0505050505tOt>00=OS03050StOOSrf».^
i5.^
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOtOtOtOtOWW03WWrf*.^-Otrf^tf^^05rf^010105t—'Oh-WS-
Wrf»-0(0(rf^tO>-JtOWh^05Wr-'tOCD^r^--J050TWOlOCO0COb5l^-J»01ffi000l0>H-l»CCC>J0l<IKIOHO0SKl
<^CSOOCOOOOlOOOOOOOiOOOtOOOOOOOOOO©
h-1H-'f—'I—'h-*1—iHHHOOtDHOtOOOHOCCOHCDCCCJTOtr^0l0l0l0l(f»-rr^k^-0000#.-O000000r^-000000rr*-00000!O~JOC0OO<I*>-C0O0il<^050lt0c0^0i0iC0lf^0t0t
|x—.H-1£o
CD^Toi
oiNKiwawowoo^OiMMMO^WMUiMOaojCl^O<10lO!D01OM<lH0C-100^O(O00fflOWKl<lOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
to
OlOTOlOlOlOlOlOlOlOlOTOT^-^^rf^rf^rf^^rf^h^-^rf*-^
tat0tOtOtOh-(—'(—'(—iOh-OH^OCOCDO^OI-J^IMKIWM
o^totooi-acs-joo-jtooiOitoomoH^oooooi—"Ji^
©ppppppoooopppppooooppp©
p—'1—'1—'r—'h-Jt—'(—'(—'1—'(—'h-'1—'1—'t—'h—'H-H-'1—ih-'(—'tOtOtOtOMtOtOtOWMWWlliMWM^^I^affiOlOOlHHHOHHHHWMWWO<l<m»C00JHWC0O^M01Hi^
V
000©0©0©000©0©0000000000
HHKHMt«l0KI^»C0W0!0ia^HOO10MWNIO^<«a<IOTOIOlOlOlOlOlHCD©l^QOHW^^<IOlWCD
log
(100A)
NH•w<*,
~s
§(f.
s
Ss-^s
S*»,
©-a
Oa
Ss-.^,
OlO"^&o
aaOr,
sTO
a*-H
0sa
A,^v^ce><>
Sa
a0>
oUo
OSa3
oo5voa
s>-s
s
(«>
a<«>
Cl
s^H.
Kg
<^«.
a.
log
(100A)
01-*0)0!D!DmcOO<OrtHIOrtl>HHa>IN<DMO-*OMOt-10«HJiHM00050000050505C35000505(MCOIMCOCOC00505051r^OOXCOCOCOCOCOCOCOTt<^^lOlO^COCOCOCOOOCOCOCOCOCOCOCO<NC^G<ICN<NCNcyi(N(N©q(NC<IC<l
<
00(M05CO^H'H^I>l>10COCOCO(NTHC<jTjfTjHOOCOGOa30CMlC'H^10Tt<CO'^(MCOOHOHC)HiHHJ^H/T(lTjlrtrirtHiHiH0!0>ffi01O)0)C0000000C0X00
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
ft?60Oi-H
csot-H(oo»nN!Oom<D«os^rtHiorto^miH-*niOTiirtMMCO^lO^-^lO00O50000O5O0i-HFHCM^H(N(N00O5O51OlOlOC0C0C0COasO5O5HHHHHHlOIO1010l0lO0000<0Q0Q0(»aCJaOOOHHHHHHH
^'*TH-*-*T(l'*'*'<ll'»l(T*^'»l(Ttl'*'*T(lTt(Tj*TjlT|HlOlOlOlOl0101010lO>0
ft?
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo©OlO^OiHlOtDM©t^!NC^HJ^MCC>«l>(MmiO(N«mifl-^0^^05t-omoooiHifiiHrtujccniocoMHiMNujcct-aonHOJcooi'HajcDco-^Tt*co-^Tt*ao05ooooooooio^t~iocDcocDr-t-cocoeNcoiac©ioioioioHHHHHHnnnco»nco©©co(OtooiOiO)HHHmccco^ioioio
to
1 o
O ©HOJ^HC)^Cl^H^01'H^H^H01ffi'!jiOOO»,#^^h'*H^il001C'«ti00lCI>lO-H^Xt>lC001>00-H^001OlO-^C0COC0C0'H^l>l>t^l>00t^I>
6h?ooiooooiooioooooioooooooooioiooioioioeMOOOcoooooo
co-*iocO'*TjiTj(ioco'>*Ttico-*coiocO'*-*ioioioioioin-*'*cO'*co-*-*
^
010COOOOOOCD'*-*CO-*0'HOOI>05(NCD-*COTHCOlOe<ICNC005t~i-H05COHtOOfflmNrtOMt'iHHCO^HOlNajlOOOOTllolTjIOt^OXOOOOO
^W-^N5qMl010 1QlOlOlfll>CDt>lOCOlOt^^OtOCOCOCDtOCOlOCOtO0000GO00GO00GO00000000X0000O000O000O0000O0O00000O000000Q0GOO0
OOFHOOCO^Hi-HGOCOCOCO^HCOOOOO^Hi-HOOi-Hr-lrHCOi-Hi—fCOlCOOr-Hi—ii-HOOCOCOTHcO^^^COT*T(('>*TjiTj(COCO'*'*CO-*-*-*Tj(-*Tj(T«TjHCO-*'*10COCOooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
o
*1
oOHODtDHOfficiTtirHiMt^n^HjnociooiHQoiomoniot'iO'*lOiniO-H^^lOCN<MCOCOCOCOCOe0COCOCOCOI>t~CO<Ni-Mi-HC5C5C5^HCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCO»010>0101010COCDCOCOCOCOt-l>l>0000000000000505C305
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
dsCDt^I>t't^t-l0 1010lfll0 10lfllO©COCOCOW-*'^!>r'C0 01ffiOt'CDOCD-^^^^^^OOOOOOOOaOOO^HrH^H^H^HrHTjH^^101010I>r^OOOOC3505C5
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Qlit/secOOOtNOOiOOiOOlOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0>OrtOOnt-aCT«5(NlOO«5(NOOJ01>0»CDt-[-00-*01^00lO
M»ooxt-i»M»TK***offlooao^>o^t-t»^ooionoooHHHHHHK)l0l0«3i0fflOOOOOOi0i0i000(»X^^i0t>OOO
^H r-< i-H hhiHhhhhmmcknMMp:
WlOCOCOtX)M<»01iH-HMCDiHC4M©OCO'*HJKO^t-tDOHHJin(MffiOHHHHHMHHMNMMOOOOOHOHHtOOOaOOSHHM
miOl010l010000000lOlOlOlOlOlOOOO(N(NCOt>000005<NcN(N
47
log
(100A)
PIOOISOMlOOOnT|l«>OtOMOOMOMMOI00003«00001H0i0101ffl0slOl0I0ilWrtNC0HNH«HHHN!NHOHOrHTtira^Tttcocococococococoeococococococococococococococococo
<6<6o<6o^<6oo<6Sd<6oo<6S9^Soo'oo'oSd<6d
-<.
OT)HCOO>Ot>05'*'*lOi—IC0-*CO>OI>OJ00C35>ir5lO«5O5a5-*COlOC0-*i-KNrtrt-^-^-^eNCN^eNrMi-i^Hi-ioOOOOOOOOOOOOO
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq
ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
logR.' MW^lOt^OOMOHr-(0*CC010IOt1HCO'^t^c35C330500C35COCO'^'^CO
HHHHlOlQlOOOOOCOMOlffiffiOJOOOOOOOOOHHHHH
$
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo-^COCDO2t>CD00CSCOt^^^i—(t^COCOrHlOlOCDCNOOt^OOi-HI^COi—l(N5>-*0!H(OtOOH10!DHMT-(fllrt(iJt-9COOOH10010MtOt-lOC0C0C0-*t~0000'*'^'*'*O^HOa3O00OOTi<T(l-^!MC0l>t-0000l>HHHHOJMCQCOtOtOtDOJOJOlXrtOHi-KNININININmMMMn
(0
1 o
© © lOT*-*CDTtl-*05'*COO-*a50COTtlcO-*OCO->*-*TjllOlC>0>0'*-*>0
fc?MOOtDOOOqiDOOOlOCOt-OlDOOOCOOOOlOlOlOlOOOO
Tii^'ld^T^lCTlHld^T^^^TiH^^TH^^^-^TJH'^CO-COCOCO'^'^CO'
r«s
ilcqoOINNfflNOININlOt-lO^illOOt-OtDHlOOHOONffllNrtHNNOOlONffiOOlCO^OXillOlOMtMHOOOD^OOJOHODHO
Tt*C<IC0C0lO»O'^»C'^^W5'^C0'<*C0C0C0C0C0(N(M(M(Mi-H(NC<I^HC<lC<Joooooooooooooocooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
^HnffiHfflMHHHrtHlfllflHnCOlOXHHOHOIOIOHlOHn*^n co co ^^ co co "^ "^ *^ ^* ^* ^^ ^n ^^ ^* co "^ co ^^ ^^ co ^^ ^^ "^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
o
-1-5?
r-i—iio^Ht^r-ioioaicccoooaoooioio^cocoioco-^ooosoooooooo^^^lacqCNCN-^^^liOCOCOCOCOOiOCSCiCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCDCDC0COCOC01OlOlOCDCDCOCDr-r-t~I>t~C~t--t~a0a0GI000O0O0O000GOa0
of a
CDC0t0t~T*T(l^l*1010lO(N(N(N«OHHHl0loloO!DX00C0XX^TttTtH-^OOOOOOi-trti—li—l-*-*-*t#CDCOCOCOC~I>t-t>C-0000000000
Qlit/sec05<MOOOOOO>0000000000000000000"00COCAjlOOCiCiaOt~l><NlOTjHaOOOOCOC010lO<NCOCOi—l<Mi—lOSOi—<CO
t*^^XCI(N(N^in(Ot^iniOCOl0^^t*I>«M«M^OOJOOOHHHfllOlOlOC5C5asO5"*Tt<*!j<Ttl0000a000<N<N!N!N!NCOlOCOCOCO
'^OOfOOJ'HHXlOMNHXOlOHOXOJOCOC'^tDHPJlOint^OOi—(i-HOi-*FHr~aoc30ooaoc3C5t-i>i>r~csa3a50'-H'—i^H^Hr-Hi—i
lOioioujooOTtTH'tioajoiaoicciMnnocDfflt-t-ooooo
48
log
(100A)
000«30lOlOONO>0100)HHflO>0!acO[>OOOt-!0^t-Hfl-IO<M^Hi-H<NOOI>t>t>'*COCDlO-*'*tJ('*co-^T(lT)HCOT)HC<5rO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
-<
^O!t-IN(0-*T)I10(S1HHHH10IO«HHHO^»03001>0<OC-
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
6©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©
ft?
Oi—i
lonio^iooOHrtaiotooo^cOHnMot-atDt-io^Oiffl
rtNMNl0l0l0l0t-hM>0tll»03»ffl0!O01OOOOOOOO
ft?
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
1000«OOOHt-M(Nn!15aiMMnoOOMOt>bO>-*0-*ffi
HHHHCOCOnMIQlOlOtOM^^t^OlOiOlOlOOOOHHHrt
to
1 O
o <D
fc?oioiO)t>t^aoJOoiO)oa)o;oiOiQOHwoM'HOMHOHOoi
^h^^^^^^10t^^^tH^'^-^H'^iO1O1O»01010»0»0»01010^*
^
r-C5-#iOTtico^H^HCoooGOooeD(Mooa3«oeoc;c5<oic<Ncoi>coro'<*<
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
(NC0(N<M^Hr^rHOO^i-Hi-<Ol-lOOOOO^H—<-HOrt^Hi"H00500000000000000000000000000003
^«»0HMt'(D(N(Nr't^ffit^'<#t*0)tDI>Q0!0C0«0DOO©P:l0HrtHNO)OJ0)01OOOO»00^(nP5MrtilM»^C0HOHfll
0000600060666660666606606000
of a*-ii-ii-*t-t-c-t-oaoJO)rtrti-irt«NiNiNmmnmTi('*-*'*
&od>Sd>od>d'£ood>d>Sd><£<6d>oood>d>d>d>d>d>d>
o
-p
t^S<10001>T(l-*(NiOOOOiOOiOOO>aOOOOOOOOOOQOHrtiooxoooiH^t»ooi^aooocoojt'«w»iOHO'Ot^
OHrtHOOOOMMeOTjM10t-0^^iKOOO«lt>XHNnOHHHHconcocoioio«5«!t-t-c-ci30000«iNoieqio«5ioio
ioooo®««-*i)i'«[»a«ootooot-OHHmK5Hi>a«a'*«B»>*»ne»^HHHN»OO>*00»ONOOHHHI0lO»
lOlOlOlOOOOOiOiOiOiOOJOOO^^OiOQOOlOiWMCOn
49
OS
CTbibbo^bbbbbbc^^twosiNSNjiNstsoswbsbbboboboCH^.I-'«<I«OOOI>S05tS>-'C50005tOlf^tOOOaOOOOll-'©lf>-l-,050SI-'
t^.!4».0505tatai>siNSXicococo~a<i<i<ii^-i^-m-*>-tot3i>staOl-'-JOitSI>»U)U)*>-0505taU>|sSI>SI—'-J~J~]-]0>05050lOOOOOOOOlit/secOObiCOCCMIMHCOMHvloiOOOl-Jl^MOlOlCflailiHOOH<IO0xOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0l0iO0000Ot»OOOO
pppppppppppppppppppppppppppp
*>-lf>-#>-rf»-05050505taisaN>tS^I-'H-l—'CO'£>COCO-J-J~J<I*»-lf»-rf»-l4»-O5O5b»t3<I^a<IOSCHri^rf*-tf*.O5U)tOt»OlOTCnOl05O5O5t0l—'OOO
B|«
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
000000000O000000-a<I<I^KI~J<I-aO5O5asO5CHCHOlCHO5O5O5O5Mj^MWKiHHMOlOIOIClOOOOtfitOHbSHHHOWMWW
5-,CO
3
o
H-H-Ot—'l>0tOt0tOl>5U>tOt--'05tON>t0O5O5t>5t0t0l>OO5ls»O5O5*».O5CDOOCO^-ObStSOlf^OOltnP-i|t^-atStOOCH05C35l*»-^lf^Ol0500
J2.5-
CnOSCiCHOtUlOtOiOTCnt^Ot^^t^rf^WtOtOOOK-H-t—iOOKKICO??-
Ol*-05COCOC5000©tSCOt«CNl^-etOT05tDCDlf»-Ol>f».~]COtS05>-'t«O~Jl^-OI05®O05h-'tS0505*k03050505<l00tsS00~]Cn05O0J0llf»-
bobobobo^bbCTOi^bc^J^^!^!^^I^^H^tao5^^H-'I--'h^.|>»c^
OTCnOTOlOlOlOtCflC5lOl0nOlO5OSOiO5O5OSOiO5O5O5-a^I'J<IO5O5OOOOWO5CfiCDCO0501COMb3K)t5t5MlOt50001HHWHt500
3xto"
COOO1
OOOOCOfO(OOCOCO»C003CftClC3JOlCnOIOlCOWWWMHMHtui^wKiaiOiooiHHHoacDOo-aooooMMKioi-'HHHtD-JO<ICn5DO~]OOlt».l-'OJOlh-l>SCOC005OT<IH-00-JOxi(^Ot05C0OtSOlOH-H-l—00l>Slf^<S<l-a05bS05^iaJI>»000l^tS05*^0505OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
to
bbbbbbbbbbbbbobobobo<i<i<i<ibTbibirf^bbbbMMHHQOQDOO»HHOOWWW«OOOOOOOQ0010I01C1<1005tSO<l>SI>S"05l-'CO<I05lf>-*«t«-JOl|f^O<OOOaOa<I05COI>SOl
tR
ooppppppppppopppppoooooppooobbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbMHHMMMMh-"HMHMMMMMWMHMMMt5b5Wt5WMOS05C3505050i05C35<l^<I<IOOOOOOOOCC)COCOOl>»l>3b»l>BO?00000»t«bS050tOSO»Ol*^)f>-0<lf».«sStSt;a(sSOOOCD<I*^*k05^CT>l01-'-a
><
ppppppppppppppppppppppppppppk>tOlOklOtOIOtOtOktOlOtOklOIOkIOktOWWWW^t^i>-
h-.k-it—'h-'h-b0t0H-*>-rf^rf^tfi.O5O5O5O5?ClCOCDCDCnOllf*.O500^I^IOl00OOM00OOQ0HHWMOOOO<ItD!0OlOO00OaiC3<000
log
(100A)
IS
OOOOOiOitf'-lf-OOOOCJlOiOTrf^OOOOlf"-^*-*'-
#»-OCn^00OC005C0l—'<IO5COO5tO^DCOO5COCOCDCO00OS
§r
MHHH
HMH'h-'00000000C5O505O5^-^-^-^K>t0tOt0cococotooooo-j-aC7icncncnif».ii^t^-cooiOtOioi<i<i^i<ilit/seo 05COCOtOs^-C0050^1COCom05COh-05COCn^0050t05Cnoaooooooooonooion^oooos^o
pppppppppppppppppppppppp
-4-a~icsoxm^.>^.i—'h-t-'1-.'^rf^tf^cocococotot—<h-*-*i—<
3*
pppppppppppppppppppppppp^^^lj^^^LjbbbbbxcJicnbibtt-i>.I^-cocococoCn^Ol^l-'HOOCnOlOlOHOtOO'OOtD^OCOMMMMOCDOOCOtOCOMOOOlOJCD^WMWMOlOOWWWOSW
COs
o
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOtototocococotocototobowcococococococotococococo^.^•JOCOCOCOCOCHCOCOO*>-tOtOtC>~]tO<100COCOC»CO
r^
OOCCOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCOOOGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD000O00<I0000000000000000COCDCO^OCO00G000tO^'tOtO
S--h-h-'H-i^!OT<i<io5cc>C7iODOo^cni^-cn^icoco*».H-<ioooi
[^^[^|^^^^^^^|^CO^CO^COCOCOCOCOCOOiCOCObbbbbbbbbbboobtoboobtobbtDbob
a-a
3xta
*"*
o©
O1
OOOOCOOO~3~a-J~aC5<35CSC5^-^l^-^-COCOCOCO>--H-'H-'l—'-)-J-l»OH»^MSHHf-JviKioHOOOOOOOCOtOtO^tf^l^OO^IbOCOCOQOUttOh-'CntOCOMCOOOODOOOO5000CDOOl£.OOOOIs3a50CnOlO>C»C00100>-'C5^<I>-'lf>-t*oooooooooooooooooooooooo
£3
bbbbbooobobo^^^j^ibbbbst-t-t-fe-bbbbrfi-^rf».COM~a-q-qCOCOCC>CO~3<I~aCSCC>000000COCOCCCOh-i-ii-'coooooi^.corf'.totoi—'-a^if^oooxcocotoasi^-Oii^.
o4
|8
pppppppppppppppppppppppp
h^h-H^i—'toi—'totototototototototototototococococo<DfflCDcDO!OOOOOOOHKHMW^W^W^WWOJOJOlOOCDOOOlOO^vimOTOJOJOOOOOHODMKJOl
^
oooooooooooooooooooooooo
botototocobocococococooscocococococococooioicnoiCOCOCOCOOCOOOl—'1—'(—<(—'COCOCOCO<IOO~300tOCOtOtO
tototocnh-cOH^i—^"QooiaoiWoicnMO^tacDWMCn
log
(100A)
log
(100A)
00T)<iNO5r-ic0toirji>i>i>t—*FHFHFHi>coeocoi>t~eoi>0'^Tj*o-<*INfH050030SOOCOCOCOCOi—IHHH010!03fliO)0)©0)0000
dddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
-;
COFHlOCi05tOi^COi^t>r-C-OasasCS10Tt<Tt<"<*l»£)10'r}<»rjtDt-l>tDINpHOOSIOIOIOiOCOCOCOCOCOININININiNINININiNININININININCSIINlNFHFHFHFHFHFHFHrHr-lrHFHr—IfHfHfHfHfHfHfHfHfHfHfHfHfH0000000000000000000000000000
dddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
ft? »OlO-'#C-CT>COt>Tt<OOCOOit-OOINtD0003'NlOOOlNT)<tOt-OOC&OIN0>OOOOI>OFHCOFH(NiNCOI>0000000005i3505rH'*'*'*t-I^OOOOFHF-lFH(N>OtOtOi©C505050JOOOOFHFHrHFH(N<NiN(N(N<N<N<N
Tti^^T^^^^^^flTtl-^TtllOlOlOWlOlOlOlOlOlOlOlOlOlOlOlO
05
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO«01>0«3IOm«5^^^HCOT)li>1000MloOO>01HOOOO(0-*lO!>MiMHO:WTHOQOI>01lOlOCOb,M,itllOlOffl'«*HfMlOi>OlQlON^10IOl>OHmiNMilIOffiOHiN^llOtOi>TillOO!00)OOHHHFlHCO^'*-^txxcOQOHrM(M(NlololOlOi>i>i>i>XfflOiaJ
f 8o © tOtOCIDi>i>^i>Cf;MMCfiOOOOlOIOIOlOOJ0010JCDCDCDCO
!N(N(N(NO5OiOiO5O5OiO5OiC5O5OiO5tOtOtOtOll0»r0»OlOlCirjlOlC
fc?^-^^'^COCOCOCO'^Ttl'^-^»0>OtCW5COCOCOCO>OlC10>r5tOtOtOtO
C^<N(N<NCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCO-^H-^'^'^TflTjH-^TjH^H^H-riHTtl
1*8
00^Hi>M!Di>)O«i>Mli:t*«tDMrHCD«HMOINT)lt*OflitD000005COtO(N0005C-10"0030500CO>OtO'*CCOOINOe<IOl35'*
FHC0C0^00O000C500t~t~t~tOtOtOtOtOtOtOtOTtl'F}<lO*OC0CO<NCOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
*5?!OS>o«iooi(N^nMnM(SHFiMonio«50isNoioooo(N<NCO<N<NtN<N<NiN<NtN<N<N<N<NFH<NiN<N<N<N<N<N<NCN<N<N<NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
J to8
a"
COtOa}0<NCiCOt0^t-FHtOtO<NlOtf30**aOCSCi<Nt-t>tO''^tOFHCOOHMHINrtTll'JOWTjlTjIIOIDOtDiOiOlOIOQOOJCJOlHrtrtMMil-*^!0(0IDC0a>Q0Q0(»S50J01©OOOOOOOOHHHH
&; s
HMWStOili>QOOOJaH!NO)OiOHH(NtMMCOCO©i>i>i>QOQO^Fj'^'FjIOt-t-OOF-lFHINlNTtlTjIlOlOt-t-t-t-OOOOOOOOOSOSOSCS
dddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
Qlit/secWOOOlOOOlOOOOOOOOOOOOiOOOOOOOO©
OqeO<NO<NOCOFHFHtOt~l>T)H050t-;l>tO<Nt-;0<Nt-tOtOOCOt~
d<NcoT)!dddiNoooJFH^dr-JTH>OFH^i^dccd<NT)5FHTj;too6FHFHFHFHC0C0TdTjH0103OOt0l>t~l>>O>OlOC0F-l(N<N<N00a000a0
fHfHfHfHfHfH(NC<)(N(NCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCO
i-H-*-<*<NW5FHOSinoOOCOCOC-<NC»C»OOFHCOcot-FHtOtO<NT)(rH<N
^OIN^OOCOlOOOlOOOFHlOTilt^OSINOOINTjIOllOOOOJINOSCOtOt^
^oioiooJ66doiffl66d8iadddddi)D»oodto[^i>i>HMF(HHrNMiM(N«MM'*"*itlT(l'*i#itllOlOlOO
log
(100A)
MHaiCJ^fNHOCCGOiM^OOOQlO^ncOHHHOOJOJCOOO
doodoooooodoodooooododoooodo
-<
lOiOCDHOHT)(OJTt<(NOiHCD^(NOOHt^OOO®TtlCO»lO(NMC01flH^TH(MH0500050lOlfllOlfl(NWHHOOOOOJ050505
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
ododdododdodododdddddoooddo'd
ft?beo
HCOH!>l>H^t^lOffll>COCOCO'^Ti<'*lOO^OHH(N^lOlOlO
ft?
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooiOHCOOlt-01iO«OmiC^OO(NaOHl>Ttl>OiOHM!>HM>H
OOOiO'HWlOI>05COOOOJOlOCOt>OOOC<l'*lOG001'HiNOHTj<ffO
T o
o ©oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Eh?oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
cocceocococococococococococOi^5ooco««cococoe^
^aOGOOiiOOOI>01I>(N(NlOOcOHMlO(M01lOCOcOOJHTl<OSlOrtGO
t*l>000^»OiOtD(N<MNN>OCO(0«DOJOiOOHHNNWW^«lO>OWOCOO^'COl>t-t-I>I>I>I>l>l>l>OOCOCOCOXOOGOOOOOOO
^S5
«D0iM<OtOC0HHl0Ol0lflu3l>t't'WMMC0mW00l0t'0>C000
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
o
£ w
^00-*MCOHNOO(OMCCOI>HiOCqHOOWCOOOlOOiHQOHOO
NW(NG<l(:0W^^lO>OlO»r5^C'tOt-t-l>C000Q0C0COC0C000O5CO
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
ojfl^^OSCO^OffOCO^CC^^O^C<ICO^H(NCO-^^^lOCOC^C<lCCCO'^^Tj<lOI>a0O000(N(M(N(NlOlOlO'OI>l>t>^X00Q0COa)aOlO5
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
0lit/secOOOiOOOGO^OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOGOO'^QOOiOMH^'^Ir-HOlMCO'^COOt'lOlOOlO'OIXNM
W>flFH00O<MOr^O,*'*rH!OOCiM0JQ0ir'(MCCG0l>M0i«iG0 05
H^05M(NOi'^OWt>Ht>OMCOH?Dail>TfHlOOCC,HM010i
lOOlQCDOOHlNOOHr-iOOO>-ia030r<t>r~-oooococococo
53
t£
OlOlOlOl#*.|^l^l^^t^WW&3WWtOWU)K)b5H'HMWpij^^i^^ajfliapppwppopHpppHHpppipioipi^b^biwbbob^bb^Go^tob^MtOh^cobboi^bo^tob
KjHHHCD-aosooi^i^^^ooooaffiaomKiNini©GOGOOlWSDI—'©COCO^CJOsOlWtOOSI—'©CDOTI^OStO0000<IO5lit/sec*-Oirf»-C5GOl^-*>-©01tOtO~]tOh--qcOa5CO*-OiOl--J<10lOl>-'>£-COOOOOOOO^lOOOOOOOOOJOOCnOOCTOtWOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
cocDtoa3Gooooooo-a~a~]~JOio>oiOitotototoGoooco<i>^.i^.iii.i^.Ol^.|(i.*.|f^OS050JtOtOtOI—tOh-^0*>-05^-'l-'tO^©00«DOSOT05
3*
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
0505OJO505O3OSOSaJ05O5050lOlOlCHOl*-^-*-05O50505tSt0t0t000>010ItKCUI^l|i^HMM-J<l<IOOtO<OtD<I^0101lMMJN)05Ot00J0ll^-05t-'000lt005t005O5Dl-'0il^lsS0lOlf>.00t00l05C5
Isa
"
a
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOtOtOtOtOtOt0050505tOtOtOtOtOtOt005tOtOt005tOtOt005tOtOtO
f^
H-iHHMbSHWHKJbSK't0t0t0t0t0tOtO05tOH-h-h-t—iCiCD~J-JSP
01lM31HK»lM-tDHH(DO0H000e01OO00000!^Uti»00Ot5WCDH0iaUl^ll^OlffiH^O010lMvlM00<I0lK)K)'JOt5l^
i—'i—'i—'h-tototototototototototototototototototototot-ototoo^1—'H-h-'^^.^^M^rf^Oi050S050Srf^rf^^^rf^^rf^>^^rf^lf»-^rf*.rf^
totototototototototototototototototototototototototototoM-aMMtotototototototototototototototototototototototoHHMHoioiOioi^ooooooiCooioiOioioiQoioiOioioi^
35
81
OOOOtDtD<DtD(K0Ca)00<<l<1010ll^l^lf>.t5taK>KI
OOt«MOOtDH-J<iail-OlKHM^IOlOiOOi^Mi|iOffl^KIOlOat«Mo;t5HOiOi^»oioioiO^-aoo-]toij>Mos^-JOOowoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
£>
OlOlOlOTrf^^^^rf^^-rf^rf^tf^hf^rf^rfi.^^l^.^^^^tfi.05050505
OOOOC0©CDC0CD©C0C00000G0aiM^0101^WWWCDCDtDC0OOOO00M000005050505CnCIX^-^OO0000OG0<ICn00a505O-J^Oll-JCi^JOSI—'OOOOOlOTlf^tOOSH^OlOCOCnOOOl^.OJ-aOOI-'OS
CFQ
to
ppppppppppppppppppppppppppppbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb05O5O5O5O505O505O505O5O5O5O5O505rf».>f».05^>f*.rf*.rf^t^asCSCsa5OlOxOTC5OxC5Oia3<3iOSCias-4^!~4-J©©CD©-J-J0000~ltOC500<HD<W0JCnQ0OCJt0ia00^MWt5MtaCDt5KJ<II^CO01WOOl
>-
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Oi0»o»0t0<oi0icii0i0itncn0icnoi0i030a050505a50:050o~aooooOlOlOlfflOlffiOlOTOlOlOJOJ'J^I^MOOOO^^OOCOWCOKiWW&l&SOMM(^0)Ml^OJfl)WMt5HWl^Mif».|fi©OHOOUT001
log
(100A)
ao>
«>
JO
6*1is^(«!»(
<*>.
sre.
a
sa
<?*.a,
<^a
o-ao
»-o-!
a-
&.a
a«>
11-1
sid»—^.
5?aWOa
03o
~s*—^
os
a
«ors
3*^
a
o8
OS
a
a,
5^
99
ClOlCnOlOl*'.||».>^.l^1t!'050a03tOlNStOtOtOh-h-i|-'H-l-'h-0D00QC-3Mq0CDGDOO=0J0O<0COJ0ppcDJ0HHOppOlO(Olbbbbcbbo^b5h^i>»bt^bbo5toc^^oDb5tobo5^.05coboto
OS05to00I—'COCPh-tOt0050>f>.GOCOl^-t005<ia>-JtOOOa5h-©~JCn
t»t5(«KltSNltSK)HHHHHHHHO5O5O5OltOt0tOh-~J~a~]-JbStOt0tO00<l-a-aO503O505H-h-ih-l—iWO5^p00^HJOipO0*^05<lOl^.topp^]p^ipplf»-p|^*>-tOwbil^^bibo^^'KJOsbckbb'h^^^H-w^^^ibt-'bbbl^-OOOOOOOCTOOOOOOOOOOOOOOh^OOiOOOS
oopppppoppppooppopppooppoppp^^^UiUi^^^^I-iH-'J->-iJ-<I--iJ-'H-h-I-iI--i©bbb©bbbcocococooooooooo~j~j~a<ioi^t^^bototOH-oooo-j<ioirf*-^rf^COCO0000CD00-aC5O5tOh->--©COCD00t0h~©COtO>-'CD00tOCOCDOl
pppppppppppppppppppppppppppp^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^bbbbbbibibibti^i»-*'05^)^|fk^|^^)f05COCOU&:OOOOUlOll^^OlOl^l^Wt0^tO
00-J00CJlrf*.0000CJlO5CSOt©~JC5O5Mh-'OSCSOSa5OSCHtO00©tOrf*-
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOtOtOtOt0050505t00505tOtObOt005tOtOtOtOtOtOtOtOt00505tOtO^I*3^^IWW05h-Otavl^tOCOt5HCO(0©^tO^I^*JWH"J"J
C5C5C5C35~J<I~3<l-3<I-J<I<l~3<l~JQOOOaOCOCDCOCOCDCOCOCOCO000»0000p^^O^^^^^00^^t005t0tOH-tO_tOtO^l^J^l<l
^wlq^too'tobbb^bcDK-iobo^osbboooibb^ibbbtOCO©00OSC5tO0SCJl0J00SCOO5C5COmCO-qrfi.COO5OSCD>—OHCDUl
>—Ih-'h^h-'I—1h*I—It—'I—iI—'I—ih»JK-'h-I—'I—'HMHI-'H-<I—'
HHHHHHHHOpppOOOpppOpffiOOtOOOtDp^U'^^^^^^bobobbbibibibrbbbbbobobobobibobibo
^bStOt«'toisS^tO»'tObS^to'tO^'t005050505050505050sk)05'tO*]"a»a^<l<IM^CO00000D©tDCDCOH-H4HMHHMMtOOOt500
h-l—'l—H-h-H-h-h-tOtOCOCOtOtOtOtOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOtOOOtO
HHMMHMOOfflffitDCOOOODWaffiOjOlOlWWWCOMHHM^oiOJOJOOfO^cooo'aaMHOOOOcocc^MMH-^ioiaiwtOOO<Ih-OOOtOOOl0000505050TC0005h-'©OSCJl00C500tOH-'O5~JWWOt5WaOTWOi«500^MODWMWH^i^GOOiO©W)^OOloooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
OOOlOlt^l^l^WtOCOOOOOHMOOaKI^OMMMOWOCMCD00^IOimrf^h-'tOO5OtCOOia5tO0D0505COl—'C300O05rfi.05G00500
ppppppppppopooppopppppoppppp
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbtot«toi>»totototototototototototototototoi>»tototototototo
~J0DOl-J<lt0H-0l~a--IOl000St0l^-Ol0SC0H-t0#'-t00S0SO<I0Si—'
pppppppppppppppppppppppppppp^^^>^I^>^i^!^^!^^^OS05OS0S0S0S0SOS0S0SOS0S0SOS0SOSOtOlOlCHrf^OSOSOSl—'*-*©*—i00O0a0COa5C5C5a5O5tOI>OtO>KCJl>^-C5«)<OOiaiWOl03tOOO-at30il^<lCO<IOl^O)0010COOb50M»l^
'
/a
'
~~—
.—-^i»
h
,
*
f
0 5/0/5 20 25 JO hm in an
Fig. 26. Strickler's roughness coeff. k in function of depth h, for 3 cases la,lb and Ic. Tables 1, 2 and 3.
„
b-j^.
•
•
_3—
—^_
0 5/0/5 20 25 30 hmincm
Fig. 27. Strickler's roughness coeff. k in function of depth h, for 3 cases
IIa, lib and lie. Tables 4, 5 and 6.
56
no
k
100
90
80
10
60
SO
'/~nia
%
/•
20 10 iO SO hm in cm
Fig. 28. k in function of the depth h for 4 cases Ilia, Illb, IIIc and Illd.
Tables 7 to 10.
k
W5
95
90
85
SO
°
/;
a
• ^^
h
I«,
"""*""""^h
0J05 0.05 0.07 009 0.11 015 0.15 0J7 Rm in m
Fig. 29. Strickler's roughness coeff. k in function of hydraulic radius R, for
3 cases la, lb and Ic. Tables 1, 2 and 3.
0.14 Rminm
Fig. 30. Strickler's roughness coeff. k in function of hydraulic radius B, for
3 cases IIa, lib and lie. Tables 4, 5 and 6.
0.20 Rminm
Fig. 31. k in function of the hydraulic radius B for 4 cases Ilia, Illb, IIIc
and Hid. Tables 7 to 10.
0.016
\
0.032
0028
0.024
0.020
0.016
0.012
\\
fc
—>-4
20 25 50 hm in cm
Fig. 32. A in function of the depth h, for 3 cases la, lb and Ic. Tables 1, 2
and 3.
0.016
\
0.012
0.028
0.024
0020
0.016
0.012
\
Bc
~J$__"~~
*.
a.
10 20 21 10 hmincm
Fig. 33. A in function of the depth h, for 3 cases Ila, lib and lie. Tables 4,
5 and 6.
59
0.068
X
0.060
0.052
aou
0.036
\
-Me
0.028-Ed
0.020
-Mb
20 50 to 50 hm in cm
Fig. 34. A in function of the depth h for 4 cases Ilia, Illb, IIIc and Hid.
Tables 7 to 10.
0.036
A
0.032
0.028
0.021,
0.020
0.016
0.01!
4
0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.13 0.15 0.17 Rmmm
Fig. 35. A in function of the hydraulic radius R, for 3 cases, la, lb and Ic.
Tables 1, 2 and 3.
60
0.036
A
0.032
0.028
0.02i
0.016
0.01}
;
He
0.08 0.10 0.12 OM Rm in m
Fig. 36. A in function of the hydraulic radius R, for 3 cases Ha, lib and He.
Tables 4, 5 and 6.
0.068
0.060
0.052
0.0U
0.036
0.028
0.020
0.012
Ec
:-***.
%
0.0% 0.06 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.18 0.20 Rm in m
Fig. 37. A in function of the hydraulic radius R for 4 cases Ilia, Illb, IIIc
and Hid. Tables 7 to 10.
61
0.6
0.5
04
03
0.2
0.1
J,,"'"
4-/5.5
30
.---*
^-_63
\
~^-*._
I2S
lc 203.5
~^ -lb
NIKURkDSE.^^""1
"-» ^^**""»-"-•/a
3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.3 5.0 5.2 log Ri
Fig. 38. Log (100 A) in function of Log Be', for 3 cases la, lb and Ic. Dotted
lines represent Nikuradse's curve for rough and smooth pipes. Tables
1, 2 and 3.
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
.iL*M.
,.--"
\»
30
.---""
"'""-.J...^\ 63
--*"
''"VUS
Jlr203.5***-!
"^ ^-"
BUSIUS
NIKURAD.
— "V^*
lib
3.6 3.8 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.0 5.2 log Hi
Fig. 39. Log (100 A) in function of Log Re', for 3 cases Ha, lib and lie.
Dotted lines represent Nikuradse's curve for rough and smooth pipes. Tables
4, 5 and 6.
62
\
l.:i5.3...
.,-'''
^.Mc JO
^;-
Md63
„---"~
\*v?>0 ^Ti*^^ .--r=^
^^^
l!B
2035
=$*>.
.----'Mb
NIKURAD.
-^$2;i-/^~~^*°^ -T^- —wa
36 38 io 41 ti 46 «S 5o 52 %/?i
Fig. 40. Log (100 A) in function of Log Be', for 4 cases Ilia, Illb, IIIc and
Hid. Dotted lines represent Nikuradse's curve for rough and smooth pipes.Tables 7 to 10.
a little higher, at the beginning and then curved more or less to
Nikuradse's line. This shows that our case was totally smooth with
a possible little waviness in the channel. It shows also that the
equations for smooth surfaces of pipes can be also applied for
smooth open channels.
In tables 11 to 14, the percentage deviation of the theoretical
values of the roughness coefficient in equations 22, 24 and 26 from
the experimental values is given. It is clear that the deviation at
small depths is relatively big and that can be explained by the fact
that the shearing stress between the side walls and the fluid, t0b, is
smaller than that against the bottom for small depths as will be
mentioned later.
The third channel shows clearly that equation 26 cannot be
applied as the deviation is big.
63
£CD O OO 1—1 r~ OS CO Tt< CO
CN
a3*-*3 CO CO * © IN lO CD
* cS <N m * CO CO CO CO
fl ©1 1 1 1 1 1 1
aatioT3
lO •* CO r+ CO t> lO
&1 « o CO o ro CO t- t-
H SCO IN <N 1—1 1—1
o o o © © © ©
o o o © © © ©
* r^ IN i^ OS * <N
& I—H * 1—I 02 00 OO 00CN CO in IN ^1
CO if o o o © © © O
Fig.o o o © O © O
^ <N in CO 00 CO rH rH
C6 l-H CO -* CO CO CO CO-P 8 INa s< O o © © o © O
erimeO o © © © © ©
ft lO on CO CO t^ TH t*
M 1—1 -+ IN f-H © © ©
H CO <N IN IN IN (N <N
o o © © © © ©
o o o © © o ©
© -p CM 00 m lO CO ^-t r~
CD bD c3 OS 00 ia 1—4 1—1 t- oIN
_4 CO CO CO CO CO "#
^uation+ + + + + + +
CO 10 r^ * Iffl T*4 t>
1 o W CO 00 oo t- CO
H m OO OS <3! 133 ro ro00 OO 00 OO 00 00 OO
© -p <N CO lO ^ * © 00
IN OB C8 lO o lO (33 00 <N lO
CN V> ^H CO CN 1—1 i—4 CM <N
:juation&# + + + + + + +
o "O on ro © CO 00
&rS
E- OO t- t~ t~ •* CO
W * 1^ on 00 OO 00 oo
00 00 00 oo 00 00 oo
CO H CO * r^ © © CO CD
CN 1 •* IN m 1—1 r-i lO rH
8 CO m CO r- r~ CD CDbb oo oo 00 oo 00 OO 00
P-H
CO w 10 C35 CO CO t>cS
^gOO lO CO CO * * ©
rimen'r-4 lO >o -* CO <N <N
© © © © o © O
© m IN CO 00 CO 00 ©ft «f CO rH (TO <TO © © c-
>4iCO lO "* CO CO CN ^
00 oo 00 00 00 oo oo
r-5 s m © m © >o © IN
o 1—1 rH IN «N CO CO
sCO
CO
HCO
CO
rSS
8 —v
rSfOs T*S •ea
Cl "J
iV.^
s? s
M wCO
8s
rSS 0
'TS
r§ -a
e ^S> 1-1
~ COC Co
*~ it
CO ^~-
So
CO
a© 0 * 10 CO 00 CO r^ t~
CN
SP'-*3 r—f ro 10 © 10 ro CO
C3 cS * IN CO IN ^H © ©
CJ + 1 1 1 1 1 1
aatioTJ
© © IN ro 0 •4 ^
a* 1—1 <N ro 1^ r- CO CO
H sCO IN ^
© © © © © © ©
© © 0 0 © © ©
t~ r^ OS CO CO CO IN
e OS (N ro 00 r- CO CO<N IN ^-t
CO J © © © 0 O © ©
.bbO © 0 0 © © ©
S«- ^ CO IN w* ro 1^ r~
c3 f—* CD lO Tt( CO CO CO
g CN
f. -< © O © © © © ©
rime© © © © © © ©
©
ft 03 IN CD r^ r-^ CO CO
X IN T(4 r—i © O ro ro
H^ CO IN <N IN IN
© © O © O © ©
© O © © O © ©
© -p 00 OO * CD ro 0 XCO be cS ro CO ro lO 0 CO ^
%'> 0 IN IN IN <N ^ r*
quation^^ 1 + + + + + +
CO CO 00 lO CO * r-
JIN lO ro OO IN * -#
H CO CO 10 CO r— 1— t-00 ro ro ro ro ro ro
CO r~ ro r^ 10 on t*IN bD <3 00 Tt4 ro 10 © 0 (N
(N %'> rH ri ^J, ^J, ^ © ©
tion 0^^ 1 + + + + + +
a
3o1
ro O 0 ^ 1^ r^ CO
I * r- i—i ro IN * 0
W 10 <N 10 lO CO CO CO
00 ro ro ro ro ro ro
£ 00 CD * CO r~ ,_, CO
(N © CO CN <*» <N ro CO
S D~ ,—i CO * 10 10 CObe ~y 00 ro ro ro ro ro ro
rH
00 10 0 0 rt on 0ce
.vST* >o 00 CD ro ^-* CO
rimenlCO CO CO CO m m *© © 0 © © © ©
© 00 CO © CD t—t 10 roft c~ CO 10 0 CO c-
r5i IN on ra en 00 on t~
00 00 00 00 00 00 00
r£©
m © in © in © *1—1 i—i IN CN CO CO
64
ti© o Ml Ml •o CO CO 00 rt
MlCM
bo "J3co % 00
1
CO
CO
1
°2CO
1
hH
1
©
CO
+
i-l CM
CO t~
+ +
uatio73
t- l~ CO CM 00 CO M<
a1 * o l-H os US CM r* ©
H JCO Ml CM CM IM CM CM
© o © © © © ©
d o © © © O ©
io ira OS CO ^ i—1 ©
& CO Ml © >o CM © 00
mi CO Ml CO CN CM CM i-l
CO i O O © © © © ©
bbd O © © © © ©
h
^ CI 00 r~ r> "O IO l>
CO o lO CO CO CM CM CM
-P § CM rH r-1
imen^ o o © © © © ©
o o © © © O O
©
ft CO CO CO M CO © t-
X c~ o © 1^. CD CO >o
H CO lO Ml CO CO CO CO
o o © © © © ©
o © © © © o ©
© -p
bo JS
CM Ml CM CO © I-l t-
COCO © rM CO CO CM Ml
CM co •£ o CM CM I-H © r- Ml
quationi-H
+ + +
l-H
+ + + +
,-H ira Ml 1—1 CO CM ©
ir- © OO © lO CO 00
H CO CO o IO l> 00 00
CO r- 00 00 00 GO 00
© -P CO Ml Ml Ml CO r- io
CM bo co 00 O © CO CM i-i ©
CM *> Ml lO CO CM o i—l CO
tion <^T3 + + + + + 1 1
CO
aMl Ml CIS CO CO 133 pH
Sia © CM © CM CO Ml
H o r~ Ml r~ © ^H cm
CO CO l> t- 00 GO GO
00 & lO 00 O io CM CO ©
CM t- CO ^h r-i © CD ©
£ c~ Ml CM CO <-> CM lObb lO CO t- r~ 00 00 00
t*
io CM 00 00 CD CO o
CO
.vSMl lO ao t—t Ml f. co
a CO 00 r~ i^ CO Ml CM
o © © © © © ©
au© o lO Ml r~ Ml CM CO
ftA
l-H CM 00 00 CO 00 CM
•44 1> pH CM CM CM l-H i—I
io CO CO CO CO co co
rS« 1 lO © o O o © ©1—1 CM CO Ml iO co
I
CO
£5
8o
CO
age ation © pH © 00 CM CM CO
MlCM
a
CM
OO idCM
idCO
CO
qCM
CO CM
© CO
© + + + + + 1 1T3
cS3 lO Ml CO 1—1 CM CM O
c1 t- M Ml lO CO C~ 00
H JCM CM CM CM O.I CM CM
© © O © o © ©
d o O © © © ©
CO CM i—l CO r^ CO ©
& CO i—i CO Ml lO t- ©
CM CM CM (M CM CM CM
CO S © © o © o © ©
Fig."C d © © O o © ©
* CO CO CO M CO © l>
co t~ © © 1^ CO CO lO
-P S CO lO Ml CO CO CO CO
ti -c o © © © © © ©
S© © © © © © ©
©
& © CO 1— © 10 lO l>
X © lO CO CO CM CM CM
W .o CM i-H i-H l-H i-H
o © © © © © ©
© © © o © © ©
© -p© pH CO CO © CO l>
lO r~ CO CN CO i-H CM
CM
°t3
,-H CO 00 © OS. © O
quation1 + + + + + +
lO CO <-> CO OO Mi l>
i00 t~ © o CM © ©
H CO CO © lO ^H t~ »o
© CS 00 CO CO t~ [~
© -p 00 CM _ lO CO lO CM
CM be cS r-+ CM 1> H t~ X l>
CM c3> £- Ml © © © i-H <M
PiO
° T3 1 1 1 + + + +
EquaMi CO r^ no CO lO CO
iJi
CO CO
OS
CO
CM
OS CO
Ml
© OS
CM OS
© 00 CO t^ r~ t^ CO
_j r~ CO r- © Ml 00
CM M CM © 00 i-H t~ ©
S GO CO CM i^ Ml © 00
bO i* OS OS 00 i> r~ t- CO
"3 © 1(0 Ml i^ Ml CN CO
g i—1 CM OO 00 CO 00 CM
a .* t~ ,_H CM CM CM i-H i-H
srimelO CO CD CO CO CO CO
lO CM CO 00 CO CO ©
fti4a
Ml lO 00 l-H Ml t- CD
K CO 00 1^ r~ CD Ml CM
w © © © © O © ©
rf©
US © © © © © o
CM CO Ml io co
65
It appears that the deviation in eqn. 24 is bigger than that of
eqn. 22. To find the reason for that we have to discuss the origin of
both equations. When Strickhr wrote his law of friction he assumed
that the value of k depends only on the state of roughness of the
surface, or assumed that k does not vary with the variation of the
depth or hydraulic radius. That was found to be not exactly true.
The value of k increases with the increase of the depth till a certain
limit then begins to decrease again, Fig. 26, 27 and 28. Any how
the difference between the maximum and the minimum computedvalues of k is not bigger than 5 % in all our cases, except in case III c
(10 %). This shows that the assumption of Strickhr is a good approxi¬mation for practical purposes.
On the other hand, the factor A in the equation of Darcy dependson the Reynolds number and the relative roughness for small
Reynolds numbers, and only on the relative roughness for bigReynolds numbers. For this reason, the value of A, in some cases,
for small depths was found to be about the double of A at biggerdepths. For example, in case IIIc, Fig. 34, at 5 cm depth A = 0.0673
and at 60 cm depth = 0.0357. In case lie, Fig. 33, A = 0.0329 at
5 cm depth and 0.0193 at 34 cm depth. And as A depends to a certain
limit on the Reynolds number, a sure mistake will result in applying
eqn. 24 at a certain depth, as at this depth the Reynolds number
in case of totally rough is not the same as of totally smooth channel.
For example, in channel III, at 5 cm depth Se' = 8000 for totally
rough channel and 14000 for totally smooth channel. For 10 cm
depth Ee' = 22000 and 40000 respectively, and for 20 cm depthRe' = 48000 and 85000 respectively. This shows that eqn. 24 can
not be expected to be totally correct.
v^
v ^A *)On the other hand, as Jp =
7„!"
„and J, =
„
"
', an error
**JBW*'. 8giJmof a % in measuring Je will give an error of a % in A and about <r%
in k. So the percentage deviation in A equation ought to be about
the double of the deviation in the km equation. But, as the deviation
in the AOT equation is generally smaller than the double of the
deviation in the km equation, we can say that — in spite of the
*) dX _dJe dk_ 1 dJe
66
above explanation — the Am equation acts still as a rough approxi¬mation but not so well as km equation (eqn. 22).
Any how, as the percentage deviation in both equations is not
very big, and within the possible errors in measurements, both
equations can be accepted for laboratory and field purposes.
The deviation—~ '^ changes in signwith the increase ofdepth
and that is due to the change of the ratio —- with the change of
depth. As has to be expected the deviation in the Am equation and
the deviation in the hm equation have generally different signs.
It was found also that for totally smooth channel, Prandtl-
Karman's formula 1
— = ALogRelf\+B (27)
can be applied for open channels. According to Nihuradse [11]A = 2 and B= —0.8. As for circular sections i?e = 4i?e', the
equation must be written in the form,
-^ = 2 Log 4 Be'iX- 0.8 (28)
As an example: for case Ilia, at h = 57.72 cm, Re' = 191550,A = 0.0126, l/A~= 0.112.
Log 4 Rji\ = Log 4x191550x0.112 = Log 85810 = 4.9336,
the right hand side of the equation =2 X 4.9336-0.8 = 9.067,
the left hand side of the equation = jr^r^= 8.929
with a deviation of j^X 100 = 1.5%.
At h = 40.46 cm, Re' = 156560, A = 0.0124, yX= 0.111
the r.h.s. = 8.884, the l.h.s. = 9.000 with a deviation of 1.3%.
Concerning the mean velocity distribution curves (cal¬culated with mean values over horizontal sections), the followingmay be noticed, see Fig. 5 to 17 and table 15.
a) The maximum velocity is below the water surface and the
vratio -5^ does not change too much and decreases with the increase
of depth.
67
*
8
rH OO CD
^ WWo o o
00 IN Tt<^4 ^ CO
O O OT|l lO -*o o ©
CD rH CO
lOlO *© o ©
O t- I>
I— lO -r)Ho o o
r~r co io
c~ lO -*o oo
t- r- ooCM CO CO
o o o
rH CO t^
t^ CO CO
o © o
OS t- t>
© OS OSrH © O
OO © CO(Ot-t-
o o ©
8
Si
rS
10 10C-
O 00 CO00 CD CD
CO 00 00
lO CD rH
r~ t- oo
OS CO CO
CO 00 OS00 D- CO
CO CO t*-*003r~ oo co
OS I> torH CO CO
C- CO lO
CO rH CO
* lO <N
C~ CD CO
CO CM CD
* ^ INCO lO CO
i> -* co00 OS lO
CO CO to
© CO l>
t> rH COCO CO CO
Ot-lffl-* OS *t> IO to
O OO o o o O © © © © © © © © O OO o o © © © © © © © o o o
la1°
8.20 14.00 19.00 7.50 15.00 24.50 8.35 16.00 20.50 7.70 16.50 23.00 7.40 13.00 19.00 7.70 13.20 19.00 13.00 21.00 36.00 14.00 25.00 30.00 13.60 24.80 35.00 15.00 24.00 32.00
* C- COoo co ia
o o oO OS COrH O O
ONIOOS OS 00
© O O
lO CO CO
Ir~ t-- CD
o o o
to OS to
OS OS t^
o© o
rH OS CD
OS 00 l>
O © O
O tHtXt- CD to
© ©O
o co oCM OS OSrH © ©
© o oCM O 00
-h ^ o
o r- co
t- CO l>
o © o
Vm m/secCO 1C CD
lO CM 00
CD OS O
00© o
lO t> OS
<N <* 00
-r}H CO CO
IO C- 00
CO CO CM
O 00 —I
co t- OS
os oo r-
MO*to c- oo
t- CD OSO CD lOto CD t>
OOOlOCO rH ©00 O rH
lOOlrtCO © OS
to 00 00
rH 00 CM
© rH CO
to CO CO
© IO CD
CO«HJco t- r~
O © rH o © o O O O © © © © © © © © O O r^ r* o o o o © © © o ©
o
a ">
| CC 0.708 0.986 1.147 0.595 0.840 0.977 0.591 0.803 0.965 0.649 0.844 0.969 0.580 0.779 0.910 0.553 0.725 0.816 0.897 1.074 1.166 0.633 0.885 0.971 0.562 0.681 0.714 0.707 0.784 0.801
Q lit/secO O OIN t- CO
o© ©* O OS
o o ©rH © CO
-* o ©00 00 t-
00 o oIN OS 1>
o o o* rH CO
o © oIN CO ©
o o oCO CD CO
to © oCO "* rH
oon© IO CM
[~ t- OSCD 00 rH
rH CO
CM © CO
IfllOt*^ IN
IN OS OSlO * lO^ CM
© © rH
CO 00 lOCO rH O
CM t~ -*to CO CO
(N CO rH
CM IN OS
© lO 00rH CM CO
OS tH rH
CD © OS
CM CM
© rH t-
CD IO rH
rH CM
O 00 INoo r- co
r-1 tM
O 99.95 99.95 99.40 49.82 49.82 49.43 60.05 60.05 60.20 60.20
10.18 20.42 29.79 9.97 19.51 29.95 9.95 20.34 29.57 10.35 20.52 33.62 10.29 20.40 33.63 10.35 20.27 30.49 20.12 41.00 57.50 20.34 42.16 53.98 20.28 40.43 54.88 20.27 40.22 58.72
CasecS
M
r=1—1
o
M
cSMM
libo
MM Ilia Illb IIIc PHI
CO
60
.aT3rl
O
68
b) For the same case of roughness at the same distance from the
bed the mean velocity increases with the increase of the total water
depth, except in case Hid, i. e. with bed smooth and side walls
rough, as in this case for small water depth the bed has a biggerinfluence on the velocity distribution than the side walls, see Fig. 17.
c) The shape of the mean velocity distribution curve is more
or less the same in profile 39 independent of the case of roughness.
d) The value of a, calculated according to eqn. 13 and not from
the mean velocity distribution curve, increases with the increase of
roughness and its value at the inlet is smaller than that at the
outlet. (Further see page 41.)
VII. Determination of the shearing stress on side walls and
bed from the velocity distribution
1. Introduction
All the developments above are based on the concept of the
hydraulic radius introduced by Chezy for pipes of non-circular
cross section or for open channels.
It may be of interest to recall the statement which leads to the
concept of the hydraulic radius in the case of the same uniform
roughness of bed and side walls for the normal flow in an open
channel.
Fig. 41
1 Chezy assumed that:
a) The shearing stress t0 is proportional to the square of the velocity,
b) the shearing stress is uniformly distributed along side walls and
bed.
69
A simple consideration of equilibrium leads then to the conclusion:
r0 = ev*
AlPr0=AlAyJe
A
To = YyJe = V*
v~fRJe with -B =-p-
One can ask if the second assumption of the uniform distribution
of t0 proves satisfactory if the width is much greater than the depth.A first attempt to answer this question would be to compare the
results of measurements of energy losses for two channels with the
same roughness but with different shapes at the same hydraulicradius, table 16.
But it would be even more interesting to measure the values of
the shearing stress at different points of the wetted perimeter in
order to have more detailed informations on the mechanism of
fluid friction in open channels. As direct measurements of the very
small shearing stresses by means of some mechanical device seems
practically impossible, we must use some indirect method of esti¬
mating the shearing stress. Fortunately the introduction of the
universal velocity distribution formula in the neighborhood of a
wall by Prandtl allows such an estimation on the basis of careful
measurements of the velocity distribution.
It must be emphasised that the formula of H. A. Einstein is
entirely based on the concept of the hydraulic radius, as it is based
on the Strickler's formula where the coefficient k is assumed to be
the same for all parts of the wetted perimeter.
2. The universal velocity distribution formula of Prandtl
The introduction by Prandtl and his school of the mixing lengthin the theory of turbulent fluid motion leads to a velocity distri¬
bution formula in the neighborhood of a wall of the following form 5):
5) Concerning all the equations used in this part, see the comprehensivebook of Bakhmeteff on turbulent flow [12],
70
0.0190
0.0198
0.0207
0.0219
0.0246
0.0299
0.0211
0.0218
0.0226
0.0237
0.0264
0.0305
87.70
88.35
88.98
89.50
88.30
85.04
83.64
84.45
85.22
85.35
84.44
83.43
0.0137
0.0139
0.0144
0.0154
0.0168
0.0195
0.0135
0.0142
0.0150
0.0158
0.0170
0.0203
104.27
105.53
106.45
106.80
'
106.45
104.75
104.27
104.84
105.65
105.77
104.30
102.20
0.15
0.13
0.11
0.09
0.07
0.05
II
channel
Ichannel
II
channel
Ichannel
II
channel
Ichannel
II
channel
Ichannel
36
Fig.
A35
Fig.
30
Fig.
k29
Fig.
36
Fig.
A35
Fig.
30
Fig.
k29
Fig.
channel
rough
Totally
channel
smooth
Totally
mRm
cm
35
=h
cm,
50
=b
with
II
channel
and
cm
35
=h
cm,
100
=b
with
IChannel
roughness.
same
the
and
forms
diff
eren
tof
channels
two
for
radius
hydraulic
the
offunction
in
coef
fici
ent
roughness
The
16.
Table
^ = C1 + C2Logy (29)
where v is the velocity at a distance y from the wall, v* the so called' 'friction velocity'', i—
v* = y^ (so)
02 a universal constant = 5.75, which is a characteristic of turbu¬
lence,
Ct a constant characteristic of the surface which may be called the
"surface characteristic".
On the basis of the development of theory and of experiments
by Nikuradse a distinction must be made between the smooth flow
and the rough flow according to the nature of the walls. For these
two cases the formula for the velocity distribution in best agree¬
ment with his experiments were:
— = 5.5 +5.75 Log^ for smooth flow (31)
— = 8.48 + 5.75 Log -^ for rough flow (32)v% s
where s is the roughness elevation measured by the mean diameter
of the sand attached to the inner surface of the pipes experimented
by Nikuradse [9 and 10].
Eqn. 31 could be applied when the number — is smaller than
5, eqn. 32 when this number is greater than 70. For 5 < — < 70
(the transition zone) neither eqn. 31 nor eqn. 32 is applicable. The
logarithmic law 29 is however valid in this case with the value
<72 = 5.75.
The universal validity of the logarithmic distribution law allows
to compute the values of the factors v* and C1 in any special case
by comparison with an actual distribution of the velocities in the
vicinity of the wall. From the value of v* = ]/— we can get the
value of t0 = p v*2 = ^-JL-.
Although the formulas were deduced only for the vicinity of the
wall, the experiments of Nikuradse on pipes with circular cross
section showed that formula 29 remains valid with good accuracy
over the whole cross section.
72
3. First attempt to determine the shearing stress z0
The velocity of flow was measured at distances 1, 2, 3, 5 resp.
7 cm from the bed and from the side walls of the channels, tables
17 to 28. The first idea was to compare the measured velocitydistribution with that according to eqn. 29 and to fix the values
of the two factors v* and Cx in order to get the best agreement.The values of v% and C1 were determined in accordance to the
method of least squares: Iiy1,y2 yn were the distances from
the wall at which the velocities vvv2 vn were measured, the
difference between the measured velocity at yi and the computed
velocity according to eqn. 29 is:
Vi - Ci v* - 5.75 v* Log yt
the terms G1 v* and 5.75 v* are then to be chosen so that the sum
of the squares of the differences is a minimum, or,
n
2 K-C>* -5.75 V* Log%)2 = min. (33)
The conditions for the minimum lead to the two equations:
n n
»C>* + 5.75 v* £ Log^ = X vi (34)
n n n
Ci*>* 2 Log& +5.75«* 2 (Logy,)2 = 2 ^LogSfc (35)t=l i=l t=l
The values of Cx and v* can easily be computed from these two
linear equations.In principle the method could be applied for the determination
of the local shearing stress at any point of the wetted perimeter.However the unavoidable errors in measuring the velocity make
it impossible to determine the local shearing stress with reason¬
able accuracy. As the velocity does not change very much from
point to point on the same horizontal near the bed it was found
more convenient to introduce "an average velocity distribution in
the vicinity of the bed", and similarly "an average velocity distri¬
bution in the vicinity of the side walls" by taking the average value
of the velocities at a certain distance from the bed respectively
73
CO
CS CO
8" S
5 II
CO C
CO »«
"S- II
<5^
e-3
e£>3.
:§ ^
s II
H§**^>
CO
©
^
^
lO
o * "5 i-H 00 K> 00 * f-H lO
05
lO
CO
oo 000000 ©
eo©
I-H
©
eo <N
00 00
lO
ot- i* <N <N 00 lO CO eo i-H
oo00 M5
oo
0500
I-H
G5
00
© 100 ©"*t* CO
© ©
lO i-H OS lO 05 00 © i-H © ©
sidewallx
=
lO
oo 00
00
<NOS OS 103 103 100 © ©
53.05eo O eo C5 00 t- o © ©
IN00
i-H
05 05 ©©
©©-H
r-H
i-H
© ©
© ©
CO 85.2 92.3 96.0 103.8 114.3 121.2 L21.0 L17.7 112.5
incefromthe
eo o r-H t- CO >o eo CO I>
ooeo 00 05
lO
OS ©INi-H
CO
(N
©
IN
eo ©
(N —I
00 OO i-H CO © 1> ^* © CO
a
distfoCO 00 OS OS 103 111 126 128
lO ©IN il
i-H i-H
•* lO 05 © CO © © eo >#
<NIN
eo00
<N05
CO05
eo©
eoen eq
eo oo
eq r-i
w
a>o W5 05 eo «J 00 «5 «5 ©
.a i-Heo
00
©OS 05
eo
©COr—1
00-H
00l-H
i-H W5cn -h
>>
a IN l> lO t- <N "* lO t- 00
velc t- OS CO
oo 05©© ©
CD
©©-H
* oo-H ©
eo © © •* -* 10 t- IN IN
eo CD
c-
<N
00 00
o05
CO
© 101 101IN O© ©i-H i-H
«5 -* eo OS (N IN eo t- 00
<N OSco oo
eo
©<N
©00
©© 1Q
© ©
a oo 05 Iffl OS © (N © 00 *
o
r-i co
i-H
1>
eo ©
i>
eo
oolO
oo©© © oo
55 a i-H IN eo t- COi-H
CD
INCD
eo
CD W5cd lO
74
o «
7^
2g §
8S3
S°Cii
•5s
MS
so
o
CO
8
3
8
«>=0
8
OSCO
o
Si,
S h
8 .
S «<a
-« -5-
* «o
g ^-
CD c^
§ II
3 S>
8
8o
•«*
?
^ 5i %,5»3 <M
"-* »*-a k.
<N
8 "
Si 0>
velocityv
in
cm/secat
a
distancefromthe
sidewallx
=
59.05 70.4 76.4 76.6 79.8qcoqq.qMjqsoidoo'cocdoo^ocdci00°OO0°Ot>O0t-Oo
58.05 72.2 77.8 78.4 87.1^<N<0O)C3^HO>
00O300O300O0O000
57.05 74.6 79.2 80.7 88.5 CO''!JHi-H*^l>'*JHl>'N50303030300030003
55.05 101.5 101.7 97.9 96.5
53.05 76.6 76.7 82.6 90.6 100.7 101.6 99.8 95.9
COi>asi-lNS)isc<3Nt-S^OO°OOOOOC3C3 105.1 109.0 106.9 103.8
oo
CO
t-ooq^qcotot-
sl ai oo >o d >>' "I id00*^X0003000303 108.6 114.0 113.8 106.7
oCO
t~03Tt,COCDCX(*003
Tj3^dc^d^—ndXfc^0300030o0303 113.1 117.4 112.3 107.6W=0O3»OWKtOH00!>.00000300O3O 114.1 117.2 12.5 L10.2
i—1
O0Ci,c0C33O^C-,lO
oooooo»^csio3cddt-^.00°00300O3O 112.6 113.7 111.3 106.5
r- 78.3 83.5 88.5 99.7 101.1 101.1 100.9 101.3
>o 97.6 101.0 98.0 94.5
CO 74.6 78.9 83.3 87.2 cococo^cooicsicNi030303O303O303O3
CNI 70.6 73.5 76.9 84.2TdHOOTjHCqO'— ">*03
doscooidoo^00OO00O0C3O3O00O
ao
i-H
64.4 68.6 72.2 76.0OOOillOMBlHOJ
d-HCOKJld^H-dicOmoooooooooooooo
Sj a i-H <N CO lO t- 10 co i—< oo
i—1 <N CO CO
75
o 1> to to to CO I> ©
OSin
oto
lOto
toto©to
l-H CO lO
CD CO
lO
© to CO © CO m * lO
00lO to
o CO
1>
CO <N 00
r~ co
lO
o <N lO CO © f—< OS to
lO
lOto©
toCO 1> ©
1>
CO <N
IIlO
o t~ <N t- © CO <N *
wallx CO
lO
to
tolOr-
CO
00to
00lO 00OO t>
<Dto
CO © lO o m CD -*T3
to<N CD lO
00 ©<N lO
OS 00
the
from 00
CO
* © •n t~ i-l © t-
-* © CO
00 ©lO©
io oOS OS
anceoCO
o OS ^H <N <N * 00
a
dist 00lO
00CO
©00
© OS OS
to © t~ CD © OS l-H
'secCO 00 CO
00
O©
lO
©lO rl
OS OS
ao
.g •** to I—1 O CD CO CD
lOto
CO to lO
COo©
<N lOOS 00
&
veloc c- 65.6 73.5 75.2 84.1 85.6 84.9 78.5
o lO CO CO OS in OS
CO
to00
too m lO CD <N
l> I>
£~ * 00 I> o CD CD
<N oto
lOto
1Cto
<Nl>© OSr- CO
a PH o <N CO CD 00 IN
o
lOlO
lO lO
CD
CD CO CD CO
s> a l-H <N CO t> l-H lO OSi-H i-H
OS
r*5
*0
~°ev,
^ ii
OS«3
e<3
cV
© Oo
3
CO
«0
e
lOOS 00 (N rt © ^ CO © 00
OS
lO
>o lO O © tH CD CO CO CD* lO CD I> t> t> t- to CD
mCO © © (N rt CO © 00 ©
00
lO
t> on OJ l~H OS (M ,-H to CO* lO CD t~ t^ 00 00 l> t»
mCO OS CD in © © © CD ©
lO
OS o CO CO (N wa T(H ,—i CO-* CD CD r~ 00 GO 00 00 t-
inCO rt t- t~ CO
idTO
CD <M © ^ rH
II
8
OO © 00 00 CO
lO
©l> o 00 * OS eq CO -* i-H
£ CO
lO
» r- CO © 00 CO (N © in
Is •* lO CO 00 00 © © CO CO
side 00 'cH <N © <N t> © 00 <N 00
•* OS CD © ^H <M lO o 00 00 ©
,fi•* lO CD t~ 00 © o © © ©
a CO •* <M OS * CD o CO © *
CO I> r- ,-H r~i 00 -*H CO M< © incH * Id CD t~ r~ OS o o © ©
0) rt rt 1-1
istanc ©CO
8.1 8.6 5.1 8.5 8.4 4.7 5.0 6.0 2.7 7.3* lO CO CO r^ © © © © ©
rt 1-1 1-1
»-H 00 © © OS © CO CO * CO
tS<N
OS GO ^H ,-H © * cq <N <M CD
o -* lO CO 1^ 00 © o © © ©
m/stH
OS © <M t- m CO 00 © m ©o
CO CD OJ o o * r^ CO r^ r-
a
* lO CD t~ on © © © © 00
>> CD O I> OS 00 i> CO to ©+= 1> p^ 00 CO o on <M IN © t-o lO lO CO m oo © © © 00o
13>
00 1M r~ t~ J-H
lO m
00
CO
CO 00 GOin00
i-H -* •* © © [~ t~ •* CO
CO OS r^ 1* CO © * >o CO ©•m m CO i> 00 CO 00 00 t-
CO CO CO CD CO 00 o © ©IN OS r^ <N OS CD © ^H © 00
* lO CD CD r- 1> 00 [- t-
fi 00 <N t~ 00 * CO CD m t-
o * o 10 CO <N * r^ -* co
rt * in in CD t- t~ c- t~ t-
Ss a l_i (N CO lO r~ m m m * oqrt CN CO * in
76
10 © IN to (N <N ,_, CO to
OSIO
IO CO to
IO lO
CO
tol>
toor-
to ©to to
IOCO * to to o (N IN 00
CO
IO
to to OS
lO IO
oo
toCO IO ^h it-
it- to
IOIO to IT- o lO 00 * OS
IO
00 IT- IN
IO to ir- tr-
CO
c-
to OS
it- to
lO
olO o OS t-
II
io<NCO
CO
CO
os to
£- IT-
t-H or- r« O o OS © CO 00
5*CO
00 00 INIO to t-
CO
CO
>oCO
CO t-
00 r-
sideto
t- OS to CO OS OS <N to tH
fromthe
OS to i-l
IO to00to
IO CO
CO
INOS
© CO
OS CO
00
CO
OS oo to o rH to CO © 00
00 —I
us toIN
r-
1-
IT-
00
00 OS
CO t>
OS 00
anceoCO
IO o o * OS o © 00 fH
a
distCO
IO
00 r)HIO to
IN to
t-
oOS
CO
OS
* oOS OS
-p<N
to 00 t- to o 00 OS -* IO
IO IO IN
lO toIN
r-
to
t- 00
CO
OS
CO 00
OS 00
arH
1—1 TtH to o <N 00 CO 00 CO
to i-l
IO too
t-
IT-
00
IN
OS
© Tt<OS 00
>> -# OO OS CM -# t- tH -<
velocitr- O
IO
00 <N
>o toio
C-
CO
00
IO
CO
CO OS
00 t-
* oo i—t OS
>o oCO
IN
CO
i-H IOCO It-
OS oq © IN OS IN OS CO
CO to IN
io to to
IO r-
IT-
to <N
1—1 o o 00 <N OS © t-
eo CO CO CO
to r- t-
T)H ©t- t-
a lO i-l 00 rt l—< co l—1 l—l
o
*00 rH
* IO
00
IO
00to
OSto
© to
t> to
Ss a rH <N CO •o t-^H
CO<N
r-l OS
CO CO
OJ
t=>
^
13
©
CS i-sS
i* T3S
o ^
?0 aj
Oi<*3
1 r«S
5-1
g as
s- oi"So "s
>so>
o O1—A
«3 0
^ JN
e«3i--l
oiII<M
5i«
e
^
>o t- -* © CO t- J- IT- t- * «5
OSco
00
CO tHGO °0 GO OS
* "* Tt< -*IO to
58.05IT- © IN IO IN ts tH M( CO ISO
CO
CO© CO 00 CO OJ i-i >-H
IO t5 IO US
OS OS
57.05CO IO 00 CO co <so in on IN to
CO -*CO © -* -** «* •*
IO "O 1Q IS
i-l >>
>o >o
55.05IO IN © M( to ^n © l-H
wallx
=
to
IO[- i^ CO oo
IO ^ IO "O
IO Ml
IO •«
'—.—' .—• .—
53.05 36.8 41.9
m
the
side to* (N CO t-H t- to oo
© 00 -*«5
© *to to to
CO
CO
l-H IO 00 _ CO i-H CO
(N IT- IN OS
»oIO CO
to to
toto
<D
©CO
C- CO OS IN CO OS CO
t
a
dist *OS CO
IO
oto
1- ©to t-
OSto
tN
IN
OS _ * CO Tt< OS t-
/seca
*oo IN
lOIO IT-
CO to
to
to
a*
OS >o lO OS to to ©
ouiaIT-
CO
CO OS CO"O
IN IO
to to
CO
to
velocityt- 38.7 41.9
CO -* o °o 00 ^ IO <s
lO <NIO
1- oo t- oo
«5 "O IO K3IO X3
io >o
<N t- i-H rt to OS OS -* © <*
CO
CO -*to OS •* «5 CO "<*
IO "O IO tl
IN Cnti
>o >o
to m IO IO © 00 ^ oo IN CQ
tN
CO
o CO to <N <=> -H Ci
IO »0 iO »o© Oi
IO «5
PI (N IO T(l CO H «) O »5 CO 1-1
o CO
CO
toCO
© IN C- to GO OS GO I*
* Mf
5s cm r-4 <N CO IO © T*< CO
77
COOO
5©
«o IS
o
a*
OSCO
t^
e 5-
COOi
Si
CN l> (N OJ to l> fH 00 CO "^
OJ
lOoCO
OJ
CO -*CD CO 00 i-H *
IN t> CO <N to * oo CD oo oo
00
mCOCO
CN TO en <NTO
<Nm
OS fH
-* in
CN CO 00 ,_, * 00 t~ * •* oo
r-
lOCD
COIN 00
to toCO
to
CD
min *io m
II !N CO 00 00 to 00 i—i © OO 00
s CO
m CO
in
TO CDlO
COCOCD
in
COCO OJ
CO lO
wal© CM o 1—1 00 CO t— CO CO <N CO
12*02
CO 1—1 CD
TOINCO
CO in CO t-
t~ co
the
FromIN lO * o o CN CO i-H i—I CO
00
COOJ
CO
TO
<*CO
TO
oCD
IN ©00 00
OJ ©
ance 1—1- (N CO CO 00 TO <N CD IN <N
dist ..oCO
o CO oTO CO
CO ©00
IN 00 <N
-p
cS!NIN
rH OJ OJ © <* CD oj T—f I-H
/secCM
•*00 CO
TO COOJ 00 ©
ao
.3 *o TO 00 © CD © © CO m
•*INTO
<N
CDIN IN CO in c-
t- CO
£
veloc I> 37.9 41.7 50.4 59.1 62.9 64.2 64.2 65.0 61.0
oo r~i CO CO 00 00 OJ i-H OJ
co • (NCO
00
coIN CD 1—1
TO© CO
m^ CO
m m
CD © r~ t> © o i—i <N ©
CM CD
<N
1—1
COTO
CO
© in 00 OS © ©to m
a !> r~ t- to m <N OJ * -*
f*
<N CNCO
CO
CD
CO
© fH
Si a p-t (N CO t> COi—t
CD
INmCO
-* CO
78
^ 8
II |» ©
8 8ft O
o
f<3
II <s
~T co
©4 3
<2> co
<o §II |
I5
~^3 8
Co 0} CO
g 1^
Ob S
co §
=0
8oo
s8
O CO _^
8•* -S
8o
5?> Id
8 II
.o
"* o
co *"*
S ||e
<N * o I> 00 CD»OTt<>-HTt<CS©lo
05 oCO
OS
CO CO
<N 00 TJH o CO »^C3c.lOOOfflM
00
lO
INCO
o•<*
lO 00 OCHtJbOltOS-* OKJIO'O-*'*'*'*
so CO <N i-H -* t-'Oil^«'OCO,«
lOto
CO
CO CO P3>QHOOH^HN
II CO lO * CD CD OciJOONWON
8 CO
1QCD
CO
O t- TtlcocMCOi—I0QCDCOlO CDCOCDCocDCOir5K5
wal.
'
© <N O >0 00 CO co mi 00 0O © C5 t- <N
T3• IH
en
CO OS Oi
CO CO•* CO 00 Oi © <N © TjH
no *o t> t~ t^ CO
the
from<N t~ es (N co CO 00 (N CO t- lO * CD
00
CO00 OSCO CO
* CO OS <=, OS Ci 00 lO * CD
lO CO CD C~ t^ CO
ance 1—i © * CD CO <N oo oo <a f. t- © CO
a
dist©CO
© OS <N >-H oi ca © >o t)h c»
>0 CO t- t- t- CO
Is OS «5 i> >o o oo N W lO CO CO CD
sect~ OS
CO COco co <N 00 CN CO i-H lO CO CD
CD Co t~ t~ t- CD
ao
.a
>>
*CO ?>. <N Oj 00 oo 00 Ci CO IN * 00
1> OftCO CO
OS O i-H 00 © <N © l-H
CD CO t> t- t~ CD
'
^H CD lO (35 ©CO©CoeNOO<N01
"©>
t~
CO
•cH CD <NCOGN*-Hi—ll-Ht~colO cocococococoioio
t- -# CO os fliiots^itsaoico
CO oCO
00
CO
<N cd t-iHNoomci* HJH5IOU310X3HJ1I5
00 l> t- >C OHHtOt-^IHJOO
<N
INoCO
eo
CO CO *•<*T^^^HTJ^«-c(^*
a- OS t~ l> * 00CO©t»©CO-5tl^
o
i—i
CO
<N <N
oCO
>C CDtOOCOrtOlOCiCO COCO-*co*#COtJ<1H
Ss a i-H <N CO t- lO CO rH
i-H (N CO 00
CO
79
<N to t~ OS IO t- CO CO
OS
10to
IN CO CO
OS
CO
OS
CO
to to
CO CO
<N © CO OS r- IN os in
CO OS
CO CO
o CO l-H OS
T|H CO
<N -# CO <N © * O CO
IOOS<N
to
CO© >0 IO <N
II !N © r- c- CO IO O -H
8 CO
lO CO
IO
CO
© OS
-*CO
IO
CO OS>o *
wals> <N •* r- 00 CO to © t-
to IO
CO
© <N © to
IO
OS CO
IO lO
the
from<N to to i-H * "O GO i-H
00
CO CO*-#
OS oolO to
rH 00to to
ance r-H © * © i-H <N OS CO
a
dist©CO
© -**© OS
lOCOto
<N pH
to to
C3<N
© <N i-H © © to o
sectoCO
CO to i-H
to
pH 00to IO
v
in
cm/-*
<N © to * c- <N <N
<n
COOSCO
<N ©io
to
lOCO CO
IO IO
-p
ot- * tN r- to to CO
IB
>
t- oCO
00
CO
© to ©>o
-H t~
"O "*
r- t» CO i-H © <N •*
CO
<N©CO
to
CO
00
CO
OS
CO
© ©
* OS <N <N IT- <N CO
CM CO
<N
to
<N
CO
CO CO
CO
CO
IO to
CO CO
a CO CO lO © o * 00
o
i-H
OSi-H
© >©IN CO
©CO© <N
CO CO
5» a i-H <N CO r-hH
lO OShH pH
*S5
Sio
a?so
£ II
O o
•^ *>•
S §.© ^
•£ ^
5 'I
to
S5
5©
<N 00 OS CO T)H "* to 00 <N IO
OS
lOCO CO
>o IO IO
Os to
N t~ * t-H * i-H © IN t~ CO
CO•a
to (N>o IO
to>o
OS
>oOS
IO
©<a
CO>o >o
<N hH <N OS CO It- to to •* *
"O >oto
IOOSIO
IOto to
<N
to
tr¬
io
©
>o
II <M l> * to to * CO (N IO IN
8 CO
>olO OS
>oCO
to
© <N l-H CO
t-
IOto
wal© <N 00 to 00 t> lr- l-H pH PH IO
Hh
'53to 00 CO
to to Ir- 00 00
(N
00
<NCO
CO
the
FromN to >o <N OS [~ 00 IO © *
00
CO to<Nto
OSto
i-H
000000
OS00
to
00
ance pH 00 CO to OS © © * IO >o
a
dist©CO
<Nto
©to
oIr-
l-H
00
oOS
©OS CO
00
t>
cSIN
CM
OS >o © lO PH IO © pH >o
/secoto
COto
toto*t- 00
00
00
00
CO CO
ao
** <N to CM IN © Tt< PH IN
CO
toto
to©00 00
CO
CO 00
ity© 1* e^ tr- * CO CO © *
>
I> CO
IO
00
IO
CO
tototo
CO
to<N IO (N IO
to
00 t~ CO * <N 00 © to to
CO CO OS CO
IO >or-
>o
i-H
to to
00
>o
to OS <* to CO 00 © to IN
(N
co CO
>oCO
IO
•oto to
>o IO
a CO © to to o Oi to to 1>
o
CO
toCO CO co
CO to ** IO
9s a - IN CO t> l>
<N
00
CO
CO
lO
80
e«3
MH
2.
Sin O
8o
o feII
o °
^5
*-l
CO
8
i-H
es
- _3Os
o
ci>
so
^S- mn
f«S
o
«0
8
CM •* Os t~ CO r-- CM » co CD Ml 00 OO CO 1-1 r-i iC)
osIO -# Ml
OS•*
co CO CO
IO
CM CMIO
Ml OS CM«5
t- OSM
OS 00
* Ml
CM OS «3 IO Ml m * <N CO 1—1 CO CO CO IO T-1 OS t^
CO CD oo
"# Ml
CO
io
m 00
IO
OSIO
OSIO •o
>o
>oMK5
CO CO
IO X3
CM l~ CO CD CM Tt< Jv o >o * CO 00 O0 00 CO CM CO
lO
OS »H CD OO 00
CO©CD
1-1CO CO
Ml
CO•>*CD
>-<CO
osIO CO
© OjCD X5
II CM O CO OS <o T-H »~( OS C3S CM Ml t~ CO t^ CO CO CO
wallx co
IO
lO i> CMCD
<*3
CO
CDCD CO
r-H CO CM «3 CM 1M CD M
CD CO
<D CM CD oo 00 «5 * OS t~ c<5 F—1 ^ CM Ml OS "3 CD CJ
thesic CD © i-H
CD CO COCOCO
00
COOOCO
IO CO CM
OO
CM
OO 00
Ml
Oo 00
*3oo
CO "5
fromCM O CO CM CO t~ OO OS OS * IO IO oo OS >-1 IO Ml
CO
t- Os
io >oCMCD
«3
CO
IOCD
CO
CO
CM r-l
00
CM CO
CO
COOO CO oo
I> CO
ance i-H © "I 00 co t~ c^5 CO OO CD >o 00 <=> CM >M OS oo
a
distoco
OS OO
IO «5
CO
CD CO
CD
CO CO(N CM o
00
CO
OO
CD
00
CO
O0 oo
Ml
oo
OS oo
ISCM
CM
CM CM rH CO i—1 >o * CO OS OS CO 00 oo t^ CM 1M
oID CO CO
CD
CO CO
o OSCO
CO
O0 CO
«3
OO
CD
00
COoo
»0oo
Mloo
v
in
cm/(—1
CO CO O f^ IO ^* 00 CO * OS rt »•( o CO CD Oo
i-H COCD co
COCD CO
OSCD
CO T—1
00
CMOO
CO
CO
»5
00CO
00
CMoo
CO CM
>>+3
velocCM t~ CO CM <N Ml CO CO CO CO CO CM CO Ml CO 1>
I-
>0 «5 CD
OS
W5 CD CO
OSCD
OOCO
OSCO
CM
l>
CM © CO IO XjCO co
00 *» OS OO O * >-H Ml IO CO Tt< CM rH Ml * CM
CO
* Ml00 CO
IO
"1
>o
IO
toOs OS CO
CO
00
>o
CO
COIO ^
IO lO
OS *»( [- X5 * CM 00 t^ o i^ OS Ml >o CM CO ><5
CM ^* CM* Ml
OS
CO
e<3 o >oM<
>o OSMl
T—1
IO
•^1>o
CO
IOMlW5
CO
IO
X5>0© «oIO >o
Fl O i>- CD cs CO CO t~ CM CO 00 CD Os oo oo CM CO
i-H
CD OSCO »3
l>
CO
OS=<3
CD
CO
MH o MlMl
CM
Ml•** Ml Ml
MMl
CO Ml
-* Ml
55 S 1-4 IN CO r- IO CO
CM
1—1
CO 00
CO
81
o
CQ
<=j v>
«© «>
IICO
•«
.0 •e&
„ C£>
lidII•-S
01 Q>CO
s O"OS 0
CO ci1-4
"©" II5~ 54
s 0•* 0
1 0
05
s <M
1 55
>-5v. II03 <S
*»
^*a
•<S>
0
0r-~>
9>
^
OD<M
95r-^
kO
8
^
1to
T3
O
*4H
9
•I
t- 1—I CO CO CO
H l> O 00 b
^^1 ^!p ^tjl ^5* ^*5^
© CD !NI t> * CD t-;lO O « » M M W
il «3 lO O IO IO *
» I
GO T|i »0 CO t- 00 tH
il 10 10 10 10 10 l»
^ e « 00 « o is
H h J «j 00 00 d10 10 to to CD to <c
th <n in c-_ >o t-- cq
Tji CO i-J 00 eo 10 t»
K5 IO ® tS t- t- tO
H O0 00 N H (0 h
0 -# to CO t~ o oco to to t- t- c- r~
to io to to CO to -#
H 00 oi CS 0> t- *
CD to to t- b- t» t-
to IC O t- Tf 00 lft
t- IN
10 to
tO IN I- t-
te tc t- h
C- tJ( CO CO CO 05 ©
to 06 <N 06 •* -* t^10 10 to to t* t- tp
CO OS •<* 00 CO © t-;©' to OJ >* to to ©'K3 IQ IO to to to to
05 CD <* 00 © 00 00
i-i # IOM 6 rt rt
*<** IS o 10 10
05 CO IO CO «<J 05 CO
i> t~ to r~ w$ co w5co co co ^# ^ ^ ^
00 -* © © * © >o
ei 10 <n° 03 00 © i-<
CO CO CO CO CO * *#
H Ol « t- i-H IO C5
82
x. I 3 7 14 22 30 22 li 7 3 1
Fig. 42. Velocity measuring points, channel III, h = 60 cm.
from the side walls. The points in the vicinity of the corners were
neglected as the velocity in these points is influenced by both bed
and side walls. The points from which the average velocity distri¬
bution was computed are located in the shaded area of Fig. 42.
The results of the calculations for the cases Ilia, Illb, IIIc and Hid
are summarized in table 29.
The values of the factors C1 and t>% are also given as computed
by the above described method. From v% the value of t0 =^-*-
can
be determined. It was assumed that t0 is constant along the bed
(t0j) and constant along the side walls (t0J. A simple consideration
of equilibrium gives the relation:
br0b + 2hr.=yAJe (36)
The relative percentage difference between the 1. h. s. of this equation
computed from the velocity distribution and the r. h. s. computedfrom the measured gradient is also noted on table 29. In order to
check the validity of equations 31 and 32 the values of Gx were also
83
V*computed and compared with the value 5.5 + 5.75 Log — in the
smooth case. In the rough case the "equivalent sand roughness of
Nikuradse" was deduced from the term
or Logs =
'
M.
If the difference in the values of the 1. h. s. of eqn. 36 computedfrom the velocity distribution and of the r. h. s. computed from the
measured gradient is taken as a measure for the suitability of the
method, it can be seen that we obtained good results for roughflow, but for smooth flow (case Ilia) the differences are so big that
in this case no definitive judgement can be made. The differences
between the value of Cx as calculated from the actual velocitydistribution and from eqn. 32 are very appreciable too.
It must be emphasised that the determination of r0 is very sensi¬
tive to small errors in the measurements of velocities. As an examplethe velocity distribution in the vicinity of the side walls for case Illb,
at h = 20.34 cm (table 22), was measured twice and we obtained:
Distance from mean velocity mean velocitythe wall, x 1 "* measurement 2 nd measurement
1 cm 47.850 cm/sec 47.900 cm/sec2 51.250 50.750
3 53.450 53.550
5 56.817 56.967
209.367 cm/seo 209.167 cm/sec
It seems to be a good agreement between the first and the
second measurements. The computed value of r0a was however in
the first case 0.0050 gm/cm2 and in the second case 0.0053 gm/cm2,i. e. with a difference of 6 %, which is bigger than for the velocity.
For the rough case the real value of s "equivalent sand rough¬ness", seems to be somewhere between 0.5 and 0.6 cm.
The mean diameter of the rounded gravel used as artificial
roughness sm as computed from Pig. 24 = 0.82 cm. The difference
between sm and s is due to the fact that a part of the gravel was
imbedded in the cement used in fixing it to the concrete slabs, and
to the manner of rolling of the gravel surface.
84
00 3 0.383 0.377 0.239oo a co co mi ot~ CO OS GO rH to
t- Ml t- -* I> CM
<£<6<6o<£<6 0.722 0.530 0.498
+ M
to to
to
CO Oi CO CO to r-i
O CO <N CM 00 CD
CM CO CO GO 00 to
o o d d a osMCqHHHH
19.645 19.499 18.638 19.025 19.397 18.874
O
O CO l> t- CM CM
t- CM CM O CO CD
M CO rH CO 00 O
00 TH mi CO CO t>
t-tOHO«JHgo to a a o as
GO CO Oi GO CO oo t- to a> cm mirH co o cm co a
to Ml GO to Ml CM
to C3 t- CD rH CM
to CM Ml O rH CM
OO^IIOON<N CM IN CM CM CM
OCOONNINl—1 IN rH CM rH CM
a o d o C351—irH i—1 rH
00)03000CM i—1 rH CM rH
differencein
eqn.36 /o -7.25 -25.5 +
1.22+
3.12+
5.43 -1.96 -7.03+
0.23+
0.55 -1.11 -1.18 -0.26
"a cd m< o> o co oj
MCOOHMOt~ cs co co co oi-H rH fH i-H i-H i^
o o o o o o
d d odd d
* CO CO t~ OJ rH
to O CO to l> CO
to CM O O CD toCO i—1 CO i-H i-H Ooo qo oo
d d d d d d
co co to e» t> to
O I> Ml Ml rH to
O t- Ci CD to 00
CM rH ^ rH r—i OO O O OO O
oddddd
o t- e» Mi O co
CM CM CD to M< MlCO CO O CM GO CO
O CM rH <N O rH
O O OO OO
d d do do
© CO CO Ml M< © MlCM to 00 00 t- Mli-H CO to to CO CM
Ml Ml CO CO CO CO
to to <M CM 00 CM
t~ rH GO CM to GO
m; m; mi cm q cm
to CO to CO "* CM
t- O 05 CM as r~
CO t- CO IN to C5
mi rH co q oq co
Ml Ml Ml Ml CO (N
CM CD 00 t> rH CMCM l> CO O t> toCO © CM CO GO CM
CM to CO Ml CM Ml
T5 ^2 TS T^ ^ Ts rd 'TS T3 rH rj r-H
© g © g © gTj ~3 73 ^3 T3 r3
© g © g © grO £,Q £.5 £
-§ 57.50 40.37 20.12 53.98 42.16 20.34 54.88 40.43 20.28 58.72 40.22 20.27
Case Ilia Illb IIIc Hid
85
4. Second attempt to determine the shearing stress t0
As the determination of the shearing stress by the method
described above requires a great number of velocity measurements,
and as the results were very sensitive to errors in measuring the
velocity, an attempt was made to find a method which would re¬
quire the measuring of the velocity in few points only.The simplest method is to assume the validity of eqn. 31 and 32
and to introduce in these equations the value of the velocity mea¬
sured at the centre of the channel. As the equations do not contain
any unknown except v*, its value could be determined.
Example:
Case Ilia, h = 20.12 cm, v = 0.01156 cm2/sec,
v in the centre of the channel at a distance of 10 cm from the bed and
30 cm from the side walls is 97.5 cm/sec.
Introducing these values into eqn. 31 assumed valid for the velo¬
city distribution in the vicinity of bed and side walls we get:
5.5 + 5.75 Log Q0115*6 for v* on bed,
30 Xv5.5 + 5.75 Log
* for v% on side walls.
From these two equations the value of v* could be computed bythe method of successive approximation, and from v* the value
of t0 is computed with eqn. 30.
For the rough case we computed the value of v% for the two
assumptions s = 0.5 cm and s = 0.6 cm. The values of t0 computedin this way are given in table 30, also the relative difference between
the two sides of eqn. 36. The errors are not so great for the roughcase, but for smooth case the computation of t0 by this attempt
gave consistently too low values compared with the first attempt(20 to 30%). This can be explained by the fact that the velocitydistribution as given by equation 31 does not remain valid at
great distances from the walls of the channel.
97.5
97.5
86
?H
rss-Si
S
o
o
CO
I5
so
CO
rfS
5ft
2Q
e<3
£
third
attempt
differencein
eqn.36
°//o -0.84+
1.12+
3.13 -4.60+
0.33+
4.58 -2.56+
0.60+
4.66
a««° a
©CO o
II &CO
O CO CO * IN CO
O co t- i—t r~ coCO rH IN rH rH OO O O O o o
CD rH rH IN O T«
CO "# t- 00 O lO
O0ffl[-t-"*rt
O O O O O O
lO IN IN OS IN COCO IN O lO O OOS iO O CO OS OS
O IN rH (N O i-H
O O O OO O
differencein
eqn.36
/o -7.54 -7.33+
1.56 -4.12 -2.84 -2.59-
10.28 -5.63 -2.66 -7.43 -3.93+
0.40
a»
©lO O
II CJJ
OS
O CO rH CO CO OS
•^ IN -^ OS rH lOt- OS *C CD CO rH
r—i rH t~i i—i r-4 i—i
OO OO o o
00 00 IN "cH CO CO
1- lO •* t- O <N
00 CO »0 rH CD CD
IN rH IN rH i-H O
O O O O O O
CD CD CD CD CO tXIN <N CD 1> o r~
t- 00 CD CD CO O
O O O O O o
lOlNNOJINHCO t"- O rH O C~
os co o in os r~
ONHMOHO O O OO O
secondattempt
differencein
eqn.36
°//o -4.90 -7.58+
6.50+
1.76+
2.69+
18.96 -6.90 -7.79 -5.05
° a©CD O
la"II 0000
t-tt)00NO^00 OS 00 00 IN CO
* OS 00 t- OS "*CO O IN O rH Oo o o o o o
t-t-OOJt-IS•* CO Tjl IN CD OrH OS OS l> CD IN
IN ^ i—* i-H r~i T—t
O OO OO O
IN C- OS * CD CO
CD t- <N O 00 CN
t- -** t~ CO CD OS
O (N O IN O rH
O O O OOO
differencein
eqn.36
°/ /o -29.58 -22.97 -7.97 -11.36+
1.30-
4.85-
2.36+
12.57 -10.76 -11.38-
8.02
° aolO O 01440 01432 01008 00861
t~ lO lO IN IN t*
rH OS IN X rH CO
CO OS £- t- 00 TjlCO O IN O rH OO O OO oo
CO IN CN CD CO ** r- * * c- *OS 00 00 CO ȣ5 rH
i^ i—i i^ i—i r^ t^
o OO OO o
IN 00 OS CO CD rH
CO U0 IN OS 00 CO
t~ CO t^ rH CO 00
O IN O IN O rH
O O O O O o
n>i <"i ®'it3 =3-d =3 T5 ^ID g <D g ID g
rQ £rQ £r= £
^ T3 ^ *«* ^ T3
© to © to © to
rQ £r0 r*rO £
tj "3 ^ *3 ^ "300 g <D g OJ grO P=rQ £rQ £
< a 57.50 40.37 20.12 53.98 42.16 20.34 54.88 40.43 20.28 58.72 40.22 20.27
Case Ilia Illb IIIc PHI
87
5. Third attempt to determine the shearing stress z0
As it was not sure that the theoretical velocity distribution
formula remains valid at relatively great distances from the walls,
and as on the other hand the measurements of the velocity at
distances 1 or 2 cm from the solid boundary is possibly disturbed
from the effect of the velocity measuring device (Pitot-tube), an
attempt was made to determine the shearing stress from the mean
velocity measured in one line at a distance of 7 or 5 cm from the side
walls and the bed by an analogical computation as in the second
attempt. At 20 cm depth t0 was determined from the mean velocity
at a distance of 3 cm from the walls. The value of the velocity at
7 or 5 or 3 cm distances from the wall were the mean values as
explained in the first attempt. The computed values of t0 are
summarized on table 30.
6. Results
1. It was found that at 20 cm depth the shearing stress on the
bed t0j is bigger than that on the side walls t0 in both cases totallysmooth and totally rough channel. For 40 and 60 cm depths we can
not give definitive judgements as the difference between t0j and t0w
is small and within the possible error in measurements speciallybecause we have found that the value of t0 is very sensitive to any
small error in the velocity measurement.
2. We can say that eqn. 32 for rough flow can be applied for open
channels as well as for pipes. But, concerning eqn. 31 for smooth
flow we can not give a definitive opinion about it as the difference
between the 1. h. s. and r. h. s. of eqn. 36 was very big in case Ilia.
That may result from the inaccuracy of our measurements of velo¬
city with ordinary mechanical devices or from the equation itself.
3. To get an exact value for t0 we have to choose sufficient lines
parallel to the solid boundary and measure the velocity in many
points in each line (as in first attempt), and it would be necessary
to repeat the measurements in the same profile then go to another
profile and do the same and so on till we are certain of the value
of t0 computed. As equations 29, 31 and 32 were written for the
vicinity of the wall we are not supposed to go far from the wall but
88
to be as near as possible to it. On the other hand, we cannot be sure
of the velocity measured near the wall as the measuring device
causes some disturbances near the wall giving a bigger velocityhead than would be expected. The fixing of the safe allowable
nearest point to the wall depends on the dimensions of the velocity
measuring device and must be determined by comparison with
different devices. We have to notice here that the factor of time is
a very important factor by using a Pitot-tube as we may have to
wait at least 10 minutes in each point till the oscillations in the
manometer connected to the Pitot-tube disappear, to get exact
readings of the velocity head.
4. If we want to get a rough value of t0 for any surface we have
to measure the mean velocity on a line spaced 3 to 7 cm from the
surface and parallel to it and then apply the method explained in
the third attempt. For rough surfaces, if we don't know the approxi¬mate value of s we have to measure the mean velocity at least in
two lines parallel to the surface.
5. This point of the shearing stress t0 is very interesting and very
important and requires further experimental investigations.
VIII. Summary
1. The principal aim of this work was to study the problem of
the mean roughness coefficient in open channels, in the case that
the bed and side walls have different roughnesses.2. Three channels with different shapes and different roughness
arrangements were studied. The dimensions of the three channels
were: 100X 35 cm, 50 X 35 cm and 60X 60 cm.
3. It was found that both equations:
2/3^m —
P.Einstein
act satisfactorily enough for both field and laboratory purposes.
89
4. An attempt was also made to determine the shearing stress
between the wall and the fluid r0 from the velocity distribution.
5. It was found that at 20 cm depth (6 = 60 cm), r0j is biggerthan t0k. That shows that the definition of the hydraulic radius
introduced by Chezy represents only a mean value of t0. At bigger
depths no definitive judgement could be given. It seems that the
difference between t0j and t0w is small.
6. The problem of the shearing stress t0 requires further experi¬mental investigations which may lead to a new definition of the
hydraulic radius, based on the separate values of r0b and t0w.
References
1. H. A. Einstein, Der hydraulische oder Profil-Radius. SBZ. Band 103,
No. 8, 24. 2. 1934.
2. Strichler, SBZ. Band 83, No. 23, 7. 6. 1924.
3. Schiller, Eisener, Handbuch der Experimentalphysik, IV. Teil, page 297.
4. VTJI-DurchflufimeBregeln, Regeln fur die Durchflufimessung mit genorm-ten Diisen, Blenden und Venturidiisen.
5. Prandtl-Tietjens, Hydro- und Aeromechanik, II. Band.
6. Hunter Rouse, Engineering hydraulics.7. Normen fur Wassermessungen, SIA. No. 109, 1924.
8. Charles Jaeger, Technische Hydraulik.9. Nikuradse, VDI-Forschungsheft 356, GesetzmaBigkeiten der turbulenten
Stromung in glatten Rohren.
10. Nikuradse, VDI-Forschungsheft 361, Stromungsgesetze in rauhen
Rohren.
11. Erwin Hoeck, Druckverluste in Druckleitungen groBer Kraftwerke.
12. B. Bakhmeteff, The mechanics of turbulent flow.
90
Curriculum vitae
I was born on January 1st, 1923 in a small village near El-Mansura,
Egypt. I completed my primary education in 1935 and my secondaryeducation in 1940. I joined the Faculty of Engineering of Fouad 1st
University and graduated in 1945 with the degree of Bachelor of
Civil Engineering (B. E.). In the same year I joined the EgyptianState Railways as an Engineer where I spent 8 months. On March
20th, 1946, I was transferred to the post of Demonstrator in the
Civil Engineering Department of Faculty of Engineering, Fouad 1st
University, where I succeeded to get the degree of Master of
Engineering (M. E.). My thesis was accepted on the recommendation
of Prof. M. Hafez, Cairo, and Prof. W. W. Hay, University of
Illinois, U.S.A.
In December 1949 I came to Switzerland in a mission from the
Egyptian Government to study for a Doctorate in HydraulicResearches. In April 1950 I joined the Swiss Federal Institute of
Technology as a hearer. After passing a special admission examina¬
tion in October 1951, I began my doctor work under the super¬
vision of Prof. Dr. E. Meyer-Peter.
Zurich, May 1953.