rhode island greenhouse gas process
DESCRIPTION
Rhode Island Greenhouse Gas Process. Background and Accomplishments. Jonathan Raab, Raab Associates, Ltd. Sponsors Department of Environmental Management State Energy Office. RI Economic Development Corp. RI House, Policy Office (ex officio) RI League of Cities and Towns - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Rhode Island Greenhouse Gas ProcessBackground and Accomplishments
Jonathan Raab, Raab Associates, Ltd.
Sponsors
Department of Environmental Management
State Energy Office
Stakeholders
Associated Builders and ContractorsAudubon Society of Rhode IslandBrown UniversityBusiness RoundtableConservation Law FoundationDepartment of AdministrationGovernor's Policy Office (ex officio)Narragansett ElectricNat. Fed’n of Independent BusinessesNew England Gas CompanyNorthern RI Chamber of CommerceOil Heat InstituteProvidence Chamber of CommerceRI Builder's AssociationRI Dept. of Environmental ManagementRI Dept. of Transportation
RI Economic Development Corp.RI House, Policy Office (ex officio)RI League of Cities and TownsRI Petroleum InstituteRI Public Interest Research GroupRI Public Transit AuthorityRI Division of Public Utilities and CarriersRI Senate, Policy Office (ex officio)RI Society of Environmental ProfessionalsRI State Energy OfficeRI Statewide PlanningSave The BaySierra ClubSustainability CoalitionThe Energy Council of Rhode IslandUS EPA (ex officio)US DOE (ex officio)
Working Groups
• Energy Supply / Solid Waste (Phase I and II)
• Buildings / Facilities (Phase I, II, and III)
• Transportation / Land Use (Phase I, II, and III)
Phase III Only:
• Education
• Forestry
Baseline Energy Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions by
Sector for Rhode Island (Carbon Equivalent)
-
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Mill
ion
To
nn
es C
arb
on
Eq
uiv
alen
t
Transport
Residential
Industry
Commercial Notes: This chart shows energy sector emissions with emissions from electric generation allocated among the four tertiary sectors (industry, transport, commerce and residential) based on the electricity consumed in those sectors.
Selecting the Target
• Selected Governors’/ Premiers’ Targets for now.
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Years
Mill
ion
Tonn
es C
arbo
n Eq
uiva
lent
Baseline
Governors' Premieres' Target
By 2010: reduce to 1990 levels
By 2020: 10% below 1990 level
Beyond: Reduce to non-threatening levels
Option Information
Option NameSaved
Carbon1
Cost of Saved
Carbon2
Compact Residential Appliances Initiative 80 -$550
Combined Heat & Power (CHP) Initiative (Industrial)
35 -$70
Resource Management (RM) Contracting 70 <$0
Green Power Purchasing thru SBC 13 $250-300
Local Fuel Economy Improvements (Feebate) Initiative
125 -$300
Notes:1 Estimates of thousands of metric tons in 20202 Cost of Saved Carbon is net costs (costs minus savings) per metric ton carbon equivalent reduced by the option.
Energy and Solid Waste Options: Selection
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Saved Carbon (thousands tonne C)
Co
st o
f S
aved
Car
bo
n (
$/to
nn
eC)
3.1 3.3
1.5
1.31.1 (s)1.61.1 (d)
1.2.1 & 1.2.21.4
Options by the Amount of Carbon Savings in 2020 and Cost of Saved Carbon
Creating/managing options (II): Results
52 Options Generated
49 Consensus 3 Non-consensus
All options include estimated Carbon Saved, Carbon Saved, Cost of Saved Carbon,Cost of Saved Carbon, and Co-benefitsCo-benefits
Contribution of Options to GHG Savings vs. Baseline in 2020 in Scenario: Consensus & Non-Consensus
Energy Supply &
Solid Waste18%
Transport & Land-
Use40%
Buildings and
Facilities42%
Contribution of Options to GHG Savings vs. Baseline in 2020 in Scenario: Consensus & Non-Consensus
State Incentives for Fuel Economy9%
VMT-based Insurance8%
Renewable Portfolio Standard7%
Industrial Energy Efficiency7%
Fossil Energy Efficiency6%
Urban & Suburban Forestry5%
Upgrade Building Codes5%
Pay as You Throw4%
Non Industrial CHP3%
Elec Eff in Non-Res Facilities3%
Convert Cropland to Forestry3%
Compact Appliances3%
Transit Oriented Development5%
Resource Management Contracting5%
Increase Gas Tax3%
Open Space Protection4%
Industrial CHP4%
All Others5%
Fleet Fuel GHG Content3%
Bottle Bill1%Efficient Heating
2%
Fuel Switch Oil to Gas1%Building Shell Retrofits
1%
Tax Credits for Energy Efficiency1% “All Other” Measures
Design 2000Efficient Residential CoolingTax Credits for Energy EfficiencyRetrofit ProgramEfficient Lighting & AppliancesCompact Floor SpaceFuel Switching: Electric to FossilPublic Facilities InitiativeLocal Govt. Vehicle Fuel EfficiencyConvert Croplands to WetlandsSolar Water HeatingSolar Water HeatingLow Input AgricEnergy Star HomesSolar PV Cells ProgramGas Air Conditioning
Scenario Net Economic Benefits and GHG Savings vs. Baseline
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18 C
onse
nsus
Con
sens
us &
No
n-
Con
sens
us
Con
sens
us +
No
n-
Con
sens
us +
R
egio
nal/N
atio
nal
Mill
ion
To
nn
es C
Eq
uiv
alen
t
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
Mill
ion
Dis
co
un
ted
199
9$
Cumulative GHG Savings Cumulative Net Economic Benefit
Phase II
• Phase II of the process, launched 9/02-7/03• Chose 8 of the highest-priority options
Energy Supply: RPS Transportation: Feebates, TOD Buildings/Facilities: Tax Credits, C/I Fossil Heated
Retrofit, Industrial Targeting Solid Waste: Pay-As-You-Throw, Commercial
Resource Mgt.