rgb inks in a cmyk world
DESCRIPTION
Invited talk given at Fogra Colour Management Symposium on 26th February 2010 in Munich, Germany.TRANSCRIPT
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
RGB inks in a CMYK world
Dr. Ján MorovičHewlett–Packard CompanyFogra Colour Management Symposium26th February 2010, München
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
OverviewBackgroundCMY and CMYK printingPotential benefits of multi–primary printingChallenges of using multiple primariesConclusions
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
What ismulti–primary printing?
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Terminologyprimary – a colorant (ink, toner, dye, wax, ...)
chromatic primary – primary with significant colorfulness as opposed to a neutral, achromatic primarysecondary – the result of using two primaries simultaneously
e.g. cyan and yellow, giving a green result
multi-primary – using more than three/four primaries (cyan, magenta, yellow + black)
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Background
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Digital printing on the upmove from B&W to CMYK+
2007: CMYK+ 45%; multi-primary 10%2015: CMYK+ 75%; multi-primary 15%
growth of WW digital print market 2005: €32 billion2015: €125 billion
strong benefits for customers (differentiation, flexibility) and print service providers (value added, cost)market share highly desirable
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
HP portfolioHP Professional Displays
HP DreamColor LP2480zxProfessional Display
HP Photosmart Pro Printers
HP Photosmart Pro B9180 Printer
HP SmartStream Workflows
HP LF Design Printers
HP Designjet Z3200Photo Printer series
HP LF Commercial Printers
HP Designjet L65500 Printer series
HP LF Industrial Printers
HP Scitex TJ8300/TJ8500 Printer series
HP Indigo Digital Presses
HP Indigo 7000 Digital Press
HP Light Production MFP
HP CM 8000 Series Color MFP
HP Web Press
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
CMY printing
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
The simplicity of CMYideal CMY primaries – each controls one of eyeʼs color receptor (cone) typese.g., changing amount of cyan (C):
changes amount of light absorbed in low–frequency part of visible electromagnetic spectrum L cone is sensitive to it – response controlled by C
each color can be matched using exactly one CMY combination
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Color inputs to ink amounts
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
CMY limitationsunwanted stimulations
cone sensitivities overlaptrichromatic methods cannot match all color experiences
e.g., C affects not only L cones but also M and S onesprinting black text or line art using CMY
can result in artifacts from miss–registrationunwanted absorptions
actual inks are not like ideal ʻblock dyesʼ – further gamut droppoor color constancy
prints change appearance with illumination
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
CMY limitations
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
CMYK printing
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
What can adding blacK do?
increase lightness rangeprinting black line art and text using single inklower cost
amounts of more expensive CMY inks replaced by smaller amount of cheaper K ink
improve color constancyusing more K (spectrally flat) gives prints that change less with changes in lighting
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
What can adding blacK do?
increase lightness rangeprinting black line art and text using single inklower cost
amounts of more expensive CMY inks replaced by smaller amount of cheaper K ink
improve color constancyusing more K (spectrally flat) gives prints that change less with changes in lighting
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
What can adding blacK do?
increase lightness rangeprinting black line art and text using single inklower cost
amounts of more expensive CMY inks replaced by smaller amount of cheaper K ink
improve color constancyusing more K (spectrally flat) gives prints that change less with changes in lightingco
lor i
ncon
stant
metam
eric
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Color inputs to ink amounts
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Cost of adding Kredundancy
same color can be achieved using multiple, alternative primary combinations – e.g. K=10 and C=M=Y=10 may be equivalent
trade-offsK=10 is cheaper and more color constant; C=M=Y=10 is less grainy
consequencesidentify which print attributes matter – use primaries appropriatelybalance likely to depend on application – in photography grain is more objectionable than in technical illustrations
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Multi–primary benefits
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
most obvious benefitadding carefully chosen new inks to CMY allows for reduction of unwanted absorptions
therefore spectra that allow for greater cone response ratiostherefore greater resulting colorfulness
e.g., adding red, green and blue inks to CMY can increase color gamut on a given paper by a quarter
More gamut
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Prolonged lightfastnesscolorfulness and longevity are natural enemiessome materials tend to have greater gamut at expense of longevity
some dyes versus more lightfast but less colorful pigments
trade-off is most marked at same number of primaries though → adding more primaries can deliver both attributes
e.g. gamut of six primary dye printer can be matched by ten primary pigment printer, which has far greater longevity
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Prolonged lightfastness
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Prolonged lightfastness
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Other benefitsBetter color constancy: colorants resulting in ʻflatterʼ spectra are usedLess grain: colorants with more similar density / lightness are combinedSpectral reproduction: match under wider range of illumination enabled by greater spectral gamutReduced ink volume: primaries close to traditional secondaries
e.g. M=Y=10 can be replaced by R=10 in hypothetical printer – halving the ink amount; 15% overall saving typical
Küppers side–by–side printing: enabling opaque inks, lower ink use, greater predictability (e.g., Océ CPS700 printer)
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Challenges
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Color inputs to ink amounts
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Multi–primary color gamutdetermining color gamut of 12 ink printer requires sampling 12 dimensional space
coarse, uniform sampling of 10 steps per colorant – 1 trillion primary combinationspredicting the color of each of these combinations – decades of computation
gamut is needed when:designing and choosing primaries color separations are developed for them
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Twisting transitions
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Sneaky secondaries
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Sneaky secondariesY+R=R
M+B concave
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Spectral gamut mappingwhen spectral reproduction is the aim, what is done for spectra that cannot be matched – spectral gamut mappingunderstanding still in infancymost popular approach (e.g. Chau & Cowan, 1996):
represent spectra in 3+n dimensional space (Wyszecki, 1953)
first three account for colorimetry under chosen light source – ʻfundamental basesʼ remaining are ʻmetameric blacksʼ - only account for spectral and not colorimetric properties
match original in fundamental basesminimize distance in metameric blacks
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
P. Morovič ʼ07
original reflectance
fundamental bases
metameric blacks
all metamers
+single set ofblack weights
all possibleblack weights
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Other challengesAmplitude modulated halftoning: moiréColorant capacity: same limit applies for all ink sets – only combinations below it are valid
Chen ’06
!
!
"#
$%&%'()*%$!+,!-./.')(%&')-!0*$!-.1&!-')&%')02!!
!
Figure 3–8. Portion of the target used for detecting inkblots.
Table 3-6. Summary of digital signal and effective area coverage of all the overprint
ramps for determining inkblot critical values.
! 3)4)&0/!1)4*0/! 5'%0!-.6%'04%!
! 7%0*! 708)(9(! 7)*)(9(! 7%0*! 708)(9(! 7)*)(9(!
:!)*;!.6%'<')*&1! =>?! =>?! =>?! :??@! :??@! :??@!
A!)*;!.6%'<')*&1! =BA! =C?! =A?! :=:2B@! :BD2C@! ::>2D@!
"!)*;!.6%'<')*&1! =C"! =#?! =B?! :##2"@! A?=2A@! :=#2#@!
=!)*;!.6%'<')*&1! ==?! ==?! ==?! A?>2>@! A?#2#@! :#:2C@!
B!)*;!.6%'<')*&1! =C?! =C?! =C?! A:"2=@! A:"2=@! A:"2=@!
!
EF%! 0+.6%! 0*0/,1)1! /.-0&%$! &F%!(08)(9(!-./.'! 40(9&! 0*$! )&1! <')*&0+/%! -%//9/0'!
<')(0')%12! GH! &F%! IJKLK! (.$%/! M%'%! -.*1&'0)*%$! &.! &F%1%! <.1)&).*1N! 0! -.*1)$%'0+/%!
<.'&).*!.H! &F%!<')*&)*4!1,1&%(O1!-./.'!40(9&!M.9/$!*.&!+%!91%$2!EF)1! )1!$)04'0((%$!)*!
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
RGB and CMYK accessn–primary systems most directly addressed via n channelsbut, there is need for RGB and CMYK interfaces to multi–primary systems:
ease of integrationvast majority of content defined in three dimensions (RGB or CMYK with a specific black generation)
challenge: design virtual RGB and CMYK spaces for addressing multi-primary system
the two also need to be consistent with each other
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Self–calibration and profilingcomplex, multi–primary printing systems benefit from embedded spectral reflectance measurementself–calibration and profiling result in
more stable and predictable outputeasier and fasterintegration of printerinto existing workflows greater flexibility ofusing them to printonto wider rangeof substrates
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Conclusions
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Futurology• Move towards more primaries in
production (benefits seen in photo & fine art + potential for new benefits)
• Move towards some spectral reproduction (but not across the board – colorimetric originals need no spectral reproduction)
• Cost likely to be strong driver (but at increasing image quality)
• Commoditization of color gamut (with differentiation in others; underlining importance of standardization)
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Conclusions1. multi–primary printing has potential to deliver more
value both to its providers and recipients and is on the increase
2. having more than three chromatic inks opens door to host of benefits (gamut, constancy, spectral reproduction, grain, ink volume, non–overprinting)
3. delivering potential benefits is not low hanging fruit but requires tackling currently unsolved problems
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
AcknowledgmentsMichel EncrenazJohan Lammens
Albert SerraJordi ArnabatVirginia PalaciosMarti MariaJay GondekXavi Bruch
Rafa GimenezAleix OriolRamon PastorPeter MorovičEduard Garcia
2010 © Hewlett–Packard Company
Thank you!