revising the final paper part 1: content revision

35
Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Upload: anabel-martin

Post on 27-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Revising the final paperPart 1: Content revision

Page 2: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

For our next meeting

1. Please bring your draft again for next meeting

2. You may also bring your laptop.

Page 3: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Body draft evaluation sheet: Areas covered

• Content • Logic: Logical soundness: absence of errors in

logic; clear connection of the different sections to the thesis

• Sufficiency of evidence: Presentation of specific details (ex. figures, examples) to support the arguments (reasons)

• Strengthening of the refutation

Page 4: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

• Composition:• Coherence (Paragraph): local coherence;

linkage of ideas/sentences in the paragraph level

• Coherence (Essay): global coherence; linkage of paragraphs in the entire essay

Page 5: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

• Grammar & mechanics: formal American English rules; punctuations

• Style:• Word choice• Conciseness• Distancing • Hedging

• Documentation• In-text citation (I-TC)• Reference list (Ref.)

Page 6: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

CONTENT PROBLEMS

Page 7: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

LOGIC

1. Irrelevant parts (sentences or paragraphs)Some sentences/paragraphs seem to have no

connection with the RQ/TS or the argument discussed in a particular section.

2. Missing/ “buried” arguments The student did not present the arguments

(pro-, counter, refutation) The arguments are “buried” somewhere.

Page 8: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

LOGIC

3. Weak refutation: The refutation is not very convincing because the reader is not told why the refutation is more believable than the counter-A.

Page 9: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

1. Irrelevant parts

• Remove or relocate irrelevant parts• Clarify the need for these parts

Page 10: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

2. Missing / “buried” arguments

• State the argument • Compare your outline with the body draft: Are

the arguments in the outline repeated in the body paragraphs?

• Arguments used as headings turn these to topic sentences

Page 11: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

2. Missing / “buried” arguments

• “Buried” arguments = not given a prominent place in a paragraph

• SOLUTION: Properly manage emphasis: Emphasize what should be emphasized; deemphasize what should not be emphasized.

• What should you be emphasizing?• What is your goal?

Page 12: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Managing emphasis

Emphasized

• The beginning and end of paragraphs

• The beginning of sentences

• Complete sentences or independent clauses

• Statements that are repeated

Deemphasized

• The middle of paragraphs

• The middle and end of sentences

• Subordinate clauses and phrases

Page 13: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Goal: Introduction (G-S): definition of memory

The human mind is defined as the brain in action. The mind can perform different mental tasks that the brain alone cannot do. Different cognitive processes occur within the mind, such as dreaming, thinking, and deciding. Emotions also happen in the mind. Memory is one of the most complicated processes the mind can do.

Page 14: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Goal: Introduction (G-S) of memory

The human mind is defined as the brain in action. The mind can perform different mental tasks that the brain alone cannot do. Different cognitive processes occur within the mind, such as dreaming, thinking, deciding, and feeling. Memory is one of the most complicated processes the mind can do.

Page 15: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

GOAL: To prove that TV viewing causes childhood obesity

Pro-argument 1: Because of the coupled behaviors of viewing and snacking, TV viewing can lead to increased caloric intake .

Page 16: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Pro-argument 1: Because of the coupled behaviors of viewing and snacking, TV viewing can lead to increased caloric intake

Obesity is caused mainly by the excessive intake of calories relative to their expenditure. In other words, people become obese because they eat more calories than they spend on activities. Because TV viewing triggers snacking, there emerges a behavioral link between TV exposure and an excessive intake of calories; this eventually leads to obesity. This behavioral coupling is shown in a study by. . .

Page 17: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Pro-argument 1: Because of the coupled behaviors of viewing and snacking, TV viewing can lead to increased caloric intake

Obesity is caused mainly by the excessive intake of calories relative to their expenditure. In other words, people become obese because they eat more calories than they spend on activities. Because TV viewing triggers snacking, there emerges a behavioral link between TV exposure and an excessive intake of calories; this eventually leads to obesity. This behavioral coupling is shown in a study by. . .

“buried”

Page 18: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

TV viewing leads to obesity because of the behavioral link between TV exposure and an excessive intake of calories. Obesity is caused mainly by the excessive intake of calories relative to their expenditure. In other words, people become obese because they eat more calories than they spend on activities. This excessive caloric intake occurs because, as studies have demonstrated, TV viewing triggers snacking behavior. This is proven in a study of . . .

emphasized

restates the argument in preparation for the supporting evidence.

links background info to the argument

Page 19: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Additional

• Strengthen the connection of your arguments to the RQ/TS:• Mention keywords or their synonyms or

substitute terms from the RQ or TS as you present the arguments.

Page 20: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Example

TS: The age of criminal responsibility should not be decreased to 15.

• Pro Argument:

At fifteen, children are still incapable of adult judgment. . . . <evidence>

BETTER:

The age of criminal responsibility should not be decreased because at the age of 15, children are still incapable of adult judgment.

Page 21: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Example

Counterargument:

The lenient treatment dealt to child-criminals emboldens them to commit more serious crimes. According to the MMDA. . . . <evidence>

BETTER:

One criticism against the current juvenile delinquency law is that the lenient treatment dealt to child-criminals emboldens them to commit more serious crimes. According to the MMDA. . . . [evidence]

Page 22: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Revision activity: 5 minutes

1. Read your pro-argument section(s).

2. Is the argument stated? If not, put this in.

3. Has the argument been buried? Put this in a place of emphasis and make the necessary adjustments on the rest of the paragraph.

4. Add explicit connecting statements to the RQ/TS as needed.

Page 23: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

REFUTATION

Page 24: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Strengthening the refutation

• Weak presentation: The refutation is not very convincing because the reader is not told why the refutation is more believable.

Page 25: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

• TS: The use of electronic media as instructional material does not increase students’ learning.

Some researchers claim that the use of television or video shows as class instructional material enhances students’ learning by increasing their interest in the subject matter and reducing boredom (Harvey, 1993). However, Gustaffson’s (2006) study shows no significant difference between test scores of students who had only a lecture as compared to those who had a lecture plus a video presentation. [evidence] Another study by Levin (1998) study also reveals similar results. [evidence]

Page 26: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Some researchers claim that the use of television or video shows as class instructional material enhances students’ learning by increasing their interest in the subject matter and reducing boredom which takes away their focus on the subject matter (Harvey, 1993). However, more recent experimental studies tend to disprove this supposed effectiveness. Gustaffson’s (2006) study shows no significant difference between test scores of students who had only a lecture as compared to those who had a lecture plus a video presentation. [evidence] Another study by Levin (1998) study also reveals similar results. [evidence]

Authorial comment that shows

your assessment of the strength

of your sources or evidence over

the opposition.

Page 27: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Revision activity: 5 minutes

1. Locate your refutation section.

2. Put in an authorial comment to strengthen your refutation.

Page 28: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE

Page 29: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Insufficient evidence

• No facts, only generalizations are given.

Include factual support from your sources: state the bases of their conclusions

include research details that will add to the credibility of your evidence

Page 30: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Including factual support

Capital punishment should not be implemented because, as Langston (2003) says, it is not a deterrent to crime.

Capital punishment should not be implemented because it is not a deterrent to crime. Langston (2003) makes this conclusion based on a comparison of the crime rates before and after capital punishment was implemented in the UK. The results show only a “statistically insignificant” change of .0032%. . .

Page 31: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Adding research details to increase credibility

• Number of participants in the study• Duration• Methodology

Page 32: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Adding research details

According to the National Obesity Research Group (2009), obesity affects the health not only of the obese persons but also of their offspring. . .

A 20-year study by the National Obesity Research Group (2009) involving 1,945 participants in America shows that obesity affects the health not only of the obese persons but also of their offspring. . . .

Page 33: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Others

Vague or general words/phrases:• affect / X has an effect• influence / X has an influence• X has consequences• X will have an outcome

Solution:

1. Qualify X has a negative effect on learning

X leads to favorable consequences

Page 34: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Solution:

2. Exemplify or Explain:

Marijuana affects the central nervous system. It causes mental blocks, panic attacks, and...

3. Replace with precise words

Political advertisements influence the voting population.

Political advertisements increase name recall among the voters.

Page 35: Revising the final paper Part 1: Content revision

Revision activity: 5 minutes

1. Take 5 minutes to reread a section of your paper.

• affect / X has an effect• influence / X has an influence• X has consequences• X will have an outcome

2. Look for these vague/general words and fix these: qualify, explain or exemplify, or replace with precise expressions.