reviewer guidelines
DESCRIPTION
Review guidelinesTRANSCRIPT
ISLAM AND CHRISTIAN-MUSLIM RELATIONS
Reviewer Guidelines
1. A review should briefly summarise a book, discuss its significance, and offer a constructive appraisal of its contents.
2. If relevant, comment on the possible audience for a book. For example, is it likely
to be of interest mainly in one particular part of the world? Is it targeting a general or specialist reader? How does the work compare with ‘competitors’ (i.e. with books of the same genre and subject-matter targeting a similar audience). Would it make a good text-book?
3. Ensure that your style is accessible, and avoid unnecessary jargon. ICMR has a
wide readership; please bear this in mind when writing reviews. 4. Express your own views, likes and dislikes. We want you to communicate your
enthusiasm and expertise. However, it is our aim that any criticism should be constructive rather than personalised.
5. If, for any reason, you cannot meet the agreed deadline, it is essential that you
inform the editorial assistant as soon as possible (Emma Loghin, [email protected]).
6. Reviews should fall between 1000 and 1200 words in length. The review editors
reserve the right to shorten reviews that exceed this limit without necessarily referring back to the reviewer.
7. Please identify the book at the top of your review following the format of this
example:
Ultimate Visions: Reflections on the Religions we Choose, edited by Martin Forward, Oxford: One World, 1995, 208 pp., £14.95 (paperback), ISBN 11-85168-100-0
8. All copy should be double-spaced with good margins. Please send the review as
an e-mail attachment to Emma Loghin [email protected]. 9. Please indent every paragraph except the first. Do not leave spaces between
paragraphs.