review panel 2 meeting agenda thursday 29 november 2012 5:00 peris meeting …€¦ · ·...

PRIMARY SCHOOL ORGANISATION

REVIEW PANEL 2 MEETING AGENDAThursday 29 November 2012 5:00

Peris Meeting Room, Headquarters, Caernarfon

Item Time Attachment

1. 16:30 WELCOME AND APOLOGIES -

2. 16:40 MINUTES OF THE LAST MEETING

Right click and chooseopen file

3. 17:00 MATTERS ARISING FROM THE LAST MEETING

- Gwynedd Council Schools Allocation 2012/2013

- Property Matters, Analysis of Spending Requirements onCarmel and Bronyfoel School Buildings

- Numbers of Out of Catchment Pupils (update of page 8 ofthe statistics package) Right click and choose

open file

4. 17:45 POSSIBLE OPTIONS / SITES

Right click and chooseopen file

5. 18:30 PANEL MEMBERS COMMENTS -

6. 19:00 NEXT STEPS -

7. 19:15 ANY OTHER MATTER -

8. 19:30 CLOSE and DATE OF NEXT MEETING

January/February 2013

-

1

GROESLON, CARMEL AND BRONYFOEL (FRON) AREAREVIEW PANEL 1

Minutes

Present:Cllr. Sian Gwenllian (SG) Education Cabinet MemberDewi R Jones (DRJ) Head of EducationTony Bate (TB) Leading Manager School OrganisationGuto Rhys Huws (GRH) Schools Reorganisation Programmes CoordinatorDafydd Gibbard (DG) Senior Manager Corporate PropertyGwenan Jones-Parry (GJ-P) School Organisation Support Officer taking minutes

Cllr. Eric M Jones Local Member Groeslon WardCllr. Dilwyn Lloyd Local Member Talysarn Ward

Eirwen Hughes Ysgol Bronyfoel HeadteacherGwyn Jones Ysgol Bronyfoel Chair of GovernorsRebecca Conant Ysgol Bronyfoel Parent Governor

Swyn Maelor Owen Ysgol Carmel HeadteacherCadfan Roberts Ysgol Carmel Chair of GovernorsNia Griffith Ysgol Carmel Parent Governor

Einion Evans Ysgol Y Groeslon HeadteacherAlun Wyn Jones Ysgol Y Groeslon Vice ChairSeimon Williams Ysgol Y Groeslon Parent Governor

Apologies: None

Full MinutesNo.

ItemItem / Topic Items Discussed

1. Welcome andApologies

Chairman DRJ welcomed and thanked all who attended the meeting.

2. OpeningStatement fromthe Education

Cabinet Member

SG noted that her priorities had been developed since her election in May as the EducationCabinet Member. The main aim is to give every child an opportunity to develop fully inregard to four themes:

1. Each childs welfare is central and safety procedures are fundamental.2. Consistency in the standard quality of childrens experiences. Creating an

appropriate teaching environment.3. Creating sustainable schools for the future, in the country and towns.4. Identifying children and young adults and their families who need extra early

support, and direct them to appropriate help before the problem worsens.

Since 2009 the Council has been implementing its Excellent Primary Education for Childrenin Gwynedd strategy and as a result a new Area School will be opening in Bro Dysynni inSeptember 2013. Following the re-organisation of the Tywyn, Y Berwyn and Y Gadercatchment areas, a new Priorities Plan has been approved by the Cabinet on 9 October2012. The Groeslon, Carmel and Bronyfoel areas have been prioritised in the plan andfunding is available (in principle) for a new development.

It was noted that it was crucial to refer to the area as Groeslon, Carmel and Bronyfoel (Fron).

3. Terms ofReference andMembership ofthe Area Panel

The terms of reference was introduced, allowing everyone an opportunity to ask questions,and the following was explained:

Membership of the review panel

Definition of the review panels work

Scope of the work and what questions need answering in regard to meeting with the

22 October 2012

2

brief

Schedule and proposed completion date

The aim is to conduct three education panel meetings October, November and January2013. The aim is to present a specific proposal to the Cabinet at the end of March 2013.

This panel is a link to the community, the hope is that each panel member takes everyopportunity to share information and update the area:

Headteachers to report back to staff in the schools Chairman Governors to report back to the schools government bodies Parent governors with the support of newsletters by the school organisation office

to report back to the parents

Minutes, agendas and any other relevant documentation will be available on the Councilwebsite www.gwynedd.gov.uk/trefniadaethysgolion.

It was clearly noted that the discussions within the review panels are outside of theconsultation. Following the review panel meetings SG will choose a proposal to present tothe Cabinet, if approval is given there will be a statutory consultation period on that specificproposal. As part of the statutory consultation period a meeting will be held with staff,governors and parents of all the relevant school.

4. WorkProgramme /Outline of the

Process /Timetable

The work program was discussed and the opportunity was provided for members toquestion any aspect of it.

It was asked whether the Cabinet report could be referred at the Full Council. It was notedthat it is possible but there would have to be a specific reason in regard to policy.

5. FactualInformation

StatisticalAnalysis of the

Area

A statistical pack was presented and its content was discussed.

A request was received to provide the cost per pupil of all schools to allow comparison withevery school in the County.

Attention was drawn to table 11 condition and suitability of buildings. DG explained that thefirst column (125,500 Carmel and 46,000 Bronyfoel) were one off payments and that thesecond column represented the respective yearly maintenance cost. Further explanationwas requested by the next meeting to explain what one off work is required.

The surplus places figures were highlighted, and it was noted that pupil numbers in Ysgol YGroeslon have decreased over the last three years. This was not due to the standard ofeducation but to the condition of the building. It is not possible to accommodate 128students in Groeslon as the document noted. A request from the members that surplusplaces should not have too much emphasis. TB noted that surplus places is a key factor forthe Welsh Government and that there is pressure from the Government on Authoritys toreduce surplus places. Surplus places and building conditions are key matters that areconsidered in twenty first century schools financial applications. But, it was explained thatsurplus places is one of many factors under consideration when determining proposals inaccordance with Gwynedds strategy.

It was asked how projections are made considering the high number of out of catchmentpupils. Projections are made by headteachers and verified by the Authority. One membernoted that the new housing project in Groeslon should be considered in the projections.There are a number of nursery school children therefore there should be an increase in thenumber in Groeslon.

One member noted that a school organisation discussion in an area threatens the schools asparents dont want to send their children to a school with an uncertain future.

The importance of receiving information about out of catchment pupil numbers washighlighted.

3

6. Presentation andOpen Discussion

A presentation was given by TB that addressed the following:1. Why the area?2. Main factors to consider3. Meeting the Need Open Discussion

(1) Why the area?The context and background were given, along with the condition of the Ysgol Groeslonbuilding and the financial application to the Welsh Government for a new school building forGroeslon which was rejected in 2010 was also mentioned. It was noted that as part of thefeedback that the buildings condition was not enough in itself to attract the finance, theapplication had to be more strategic. The area had been prioritised by the Cabinet inSeptember and explained the reasons for defining the area in Groeslon, Carmel andBronyfoel (Fron).

(2) Main Factors to consider?Encompass the following elements while highlighting relevant elements of the strategy:

Quality of Education

Learning Environment

Pupil Numbers

Classroom Size

Leadership and Staffing

Community and Language

Financial Resources

Geographical factors

Sites

(3) Meeting the Need Open DiscussionA member noted that it was important not to undermine the village halls with a new schooland that they must co-exist side by side. It was noted on the other hand that opportunitiesalso arise with change, the community to which a hall provides service can be extended, andtherefore strengthening the community provision.

Will a new site be used for a new development? Every possible site is under consideration atthe moment.

A member explained that costs are important, and he does not want to see the schoolsreceive less funding following any change. TB responded that the schools full allocation mustbe looked at. School finances are based on pupil numbers. Looking at the three schools oneof them is in the minimum staffing protection policy. This means that the school receivesadditional money from the Authority because the funding based on the numbers is notenough to employ a headteacher and teacher. This means that the school in not sustainablein its current structure, this is reflected in the high per pupil cost. By conducting thesediscussions, it is necessary to consider opportunities that eliminate the need for protectionand that reduce the range in per pupil cost.

It was asked whether the models under consideration will be costed or not.It was answered in the affirmative.

A timetable for the release of finances by the Welsh Government was requested, is there apossibility of money being released before 2014? There are regular discussions withGovernment officers, they understood the fragile situation and are open to discussions.

One member asked, if the chosen proposal included school closures, will the Council give thebuildings and green land to the communities? Are selling the current schools part of thefinancial scheme to fund the project? It was explained that the proposal will not presumeselling any of the Councils assets. A school post-use policy exists and it notes clearly thatcommunities have first refusal of any site following the closure of a school. There is anopportunity for the community to create a business plan to show that there is a plan in place

4

for the running of the site that enables the Council to justify transferring the asset to thecommunity.

It was noted that a community impact assessment will identify community obligations of anyspecific proposals, and will provide a list of things to mitigate the negative impact. Thecommunity regeneration officer is available to hold discussions and advise the community ifnecessary.

A member noted that the statistical package can be misleading to anyone that is not part ofthe meeting as its focus is on per pupil cost.

A request was received for the two local members to meet with DG to discuss possible sites,the importance of sites was highlighted.

One member of the panel noted that it was unsuitable to discuss sites excessively as theproposals model had not been discussed yet. This is the opportunity for local people to givedifferent models/options forward.

An Area School, a Multi-Site Area School and Federation were proposed as different options.Research into these options is therefore required by the next meeting.

An application for more information on travelling costs, suitability of the local roads andtransport arrangements, considering young children are being transported.

A member noted the importance of listening to different options by local people and that itis underpinning that the decision has not been made, otherwise there is no use for thepanels discussions.

One member mentioned savings and the money available from the Council, if there wasenough finance available Ysgol Y Groeslon would have a new building without effectingother schools in the area. In response it was noted that a financial application for this waspreviously made in 2010, there is now an opportunity to invest over 4.5 million of fundingon the areas education provision.

It was asked what would happen if the business case was rejected? DRJ noted that it isimportant for Council officers to create a strong business case to avoid this. If this happenedthe whole situation would have to be re-evaluated in its entirety as the Councils money hasbeen allocated based on an equal contribution by the Welsh Government.

A summary of information required by the next meeting at the end of November:1. A list of the per pupil cost in each primary school in Gwynedd2. A detailed explanation of building costs for Carmel and Bronyfoel schools3. Explanation of forecasts and out of catchment pupil forecasts4. Site information DG to meet with the two local members and to present more

information on possible sites5. Research work into possible models Area School, Multi-Site Area School and

Federation.6. Work on traffic assessment and transportation costs.

TB noted that a newsletter will be released informing local people what is being discussed.Copies for staff, governors and parents will be sent to the schools and it is kindly requestedthat the school headteachers distribute them.

8. Date of the nextMeeting

29 November 2012; 5:00 Peris Meeting Room, Council Headquarters

RP 1 Minutes - Groeslon Carmel and Bronyfoel (Fron) 22-10-12.pdf

Ysgol / School

DYRANIAD

2012/2013

Allocation

y disgybl

Adran 52

Rhan 1 /

per pupil,

Section 52

Part 1

Cyfanswm

Gwarchodaet

h Lleiafswm

Staffio /

Minimum

Staffing

Protection

Total

Ysgol / School

DYRANIAD

2012/2013

Allocation

y disgybl

Adran 52

Rhan 1 /

per pupil,

Section 52

Part 1

Cyfanswm

Gwarchodaeth

Lleiafswm

Staffio /

Minimum

Staffing

Protection

Total

ABERCASEG 409,882 3,722 ABERDYFI 166,815 8,209 35,750

BODFEURIG 197,799 4,201 BRYNGRUG 197,314 6,105 15,095

LLANLLECHID 838,611 3,721 DYFFRYN DULAS, CORRIS 222,233 4,257

PENYBRYN 422,183 3,703 LLANEGRYN 157,270 5,167 16,425

RHIWLAS 184,055 5,068 7,499 LLWYNGWRIL 148,196 7,098 32,477

TREGARTH 470,106 3,579 PENBRYN 661,731 3,325

6 Ysgol Dalgylch Dyffryn 2,112,754 3,813 7,499 PENNAL 173,577 6,226 20,714

ABERSOCH 154,736 7,411 37,012 7 Ysgol Dalgylch Tywyn 1,560,321 4,302 84,710

CRUD Y WERIN 206,067 3,859 BEUNO SANT 218,082 4,115

EDERN 259,128 4,016 BRO TEGID 339,582 3,362

FOELGRON 161,254 5,718 17,379 BRO TRYWERYN 155,513 5,981 24,202

LLANBEDROG 222,800 3,453 FFRIDD Y LLYN 218,494 3,468

LLIDIARDAU 127,140 8,544 17,534 O.M. EDWARDS 228,336 3,806

NEFYN 432,064 3,756 PARC, BALA 157,540 7,877 37,335

PONT Y GOF 317,103 3,348 6 Ysgol Dalgylch Y Berwyn 1,099,466 4,072 61,537

SARN BACH 218,654 4,144 CEFN COCH 603,829 3,570

TUDWEILIOG 165,350 4,231 2,742 DYFFRYN ARDUDWY 214,548 4,379

10 Ysgol Dalgylch Botwnnog 1,725,554 3,964 34,913 LLANBEDR 195,256 4,438

BETHEL 459,298 3,493 TALSARNAU 184,237 5,722 14,452

CWM Y GLO 218,983 3,405 TAN Y CASTELL 271,961 3,677

DOLBADARN 545,715 3,611 Y GARREG 151,656 7,154 33,584

GWAUN GYNFI 547,274 4,100 Y TRAETH 606,648 3,223

LLANRUG 716,279 3,114 7 Ysgol Dalgylch Ardudwy 1,624,307 3,976 48,036

PENISARWAEN 202,056 4,774 BONTNEWYDD 608,618 3,502

WAUNFAWR 425,733 3,560 FELINWNDA 154,805 5,666 23,184

7 Ysgol Dalgylch Brynrefail 2,656,039 3,585 - LLANDWROG 264,644 3,831

BALADEULYN 178,663 8,211 33,068 MAESINCLA 1,114,134 4,092

BRO LLEU 549,111 3,566 RHOSGADFAN 178,587 4,745 4,270

BRONYFOEL 201,592 6,848 18,661 RHOSTRYFAN 218,347 3,367

BRYNAERAU 229,328 3,513 SANTES HELEN 321,713 3,958

CARMEL 188,372 4,156 Y GELLI 622,164 3,470

GROESLON 304,972 3,890 YR HENDRE 1,209,264 3,622

LLANLLYFNI 323,789 3,822 9 Ysgol Dalgylch Syr Huw Owen 4,083,658 3,832 27,454

NEBO 153,125 5,697 22,589 ABERERCH 238,440 4,530

TALYSARN 278,432 4,181 BABANOD MORFA NEFYN 161,008 3,751

9 Ysgol Dalgylch Dyffryn 2,228,721 4,048 41,250 BRO PLENNYDD 258,935 3,893

BEDDGELERT 165,895 6,521 26,602 CHWILOG 199,955 3,476

BORTHYGEST 200,798 3,609 CYMERAU 1,076,099 3,269

EIFION WYN 719,986 3,512 LLANAELHAEARN 174,819 4,576 2,177

GARNDOLBENMAEN 209,078 4,288 LLANGYBI 286,637 3,630

LLANYSTUMDWY 142,241 3,824 5,404 PENTREUCHAF 334,088 3,582

TREFERTHYR 362,290 3,202 YR EIFL 187,199 4,390

Y GORLAN 327,763 3,378 9 Ysgol Dalgylch Glan y Mr 2,917,178 3,638 2,177

7 Ysgol Dalgylch Eifionydd 2,128,051 3,655 32,006 BABANOD COED MAWR 254,516 4,302

BRITHDIR 163,359 4,032 102 CAE TOP 774,250 3,548

CLOGAU 180,059 5,551 11,751 EIN HARGLWYDDES 383,141 3,279

DINAS MAWDDWY 196,999 9,188 33,357 FAENOL 644,576 2,946

DOLGELLAU 551,348 3,750 GLANADDA 209,751 5,244

FRIOG 158,711 5,413 17,556 GLANCEGIN 713,090 3,660

GANLLWYD 172,563 8,680 36,710 HIRAEL 628,589 3,498

IEUAN GWYNEDD 137,142 9,577 21,850 LLANDYGAI 545,185 3,339

LLANELLTYD 173,936 4,314 960 Y GARNEDD 902,013 2,839

LLANFACHRETH 140,480 8,780 39,088 Y FELINHELI 508,521 3,501

9 Ysgol Dalgylch Y Gader 1,711,238 5,335 161,272 10 Ysgol Dalgylch Friars / Tryfan 3,507,149 3,370 -

BRO CYNFAL 228,572 4,437 Cyfanswm / Cyfartaledd Sirol 34,824,066 3,838 621,232

BRO HEDD WYN 260,303 3,710

EDMWND PRYS 181,655 5,400 11,702

MAENOFFEREN 786,951 4,104

MANOD 375,316 3,952

TANYGRISIAU 233,062 4,465

6 Ysgol Dalgylch Y Moelwyn 2,065,859 4,180 11,702

Dyraniad Ysgolion Cynradd 2012/2013

Gwynedd Schools Allocation 2012-2013.pdf

Breakdown of the spending requirements on the Ysgol Carmel buildings

Maintenance backlog - this is the sum required to spend on the maintenance of variousconstruction elements over the next five years. This is based on regular condition surveys andcosts are based on recent similar schemes.

It was noted in the original document that the backlog total is approximately 125,000. Followinga visit to the school there was one element that needed correcting which leads to a reduction ofthe total to 110,000.

Work that needs attention:

Upgrade some lightingWork on part of the boundary wallRe-fence part of the boundaryRe-tarmac part of the playgroundRe render one gable endTwo new windowsRe-plaster one wall in the kitchenCanopy above the cooking equipmentNew heating systemExterior decorationRepair one flat roofRepair part of soffit

Suitability - this is the expenditure required to reach the Assemblys 21C standards for the school,based on current numbers. It was noted originally that the sum amounted to 445,000 on thebasis that Assembly requirements include the need for a hall on the site.

Following a visit to the village hall, the opinion of the Property unit is that the hall (approximatelya hundred yards from the school) is suitable for the purpose of physical education, group work,concerts, extracurricular activities etc. It therefore appears that the provision of another new hallon the school site would be an overprovision.

In light of this, the original figure reported needs to be changed. The suitability requirements aretherefore limited to staff resource space, learning space resource and provision to eat out of theclassroom during lunch.

The cost should therefore be adjusted to approximately 275,000

Fire Work

It was originally reported that the spending requirement is approximately 3,000. This amount isderived from the recommendations of the fire risk assessment. Such assessments have beencompleted for each building by the Council and the work is prioritised according to risk. No workat this school is derived from any high risk.

Breakdown of the spending requirements on the Ysgol Bronyfoel buildings

Maintenance backlog this is the sum required to spend on the maintenance of variousconstruction elements over the next five years. This is based on regular condition surveys and thecosts are based on recent similar schemes.

It was noted in the original document that the backlog total is approximately 46,000. Following avisit to the school the spending requirement will continue as noted.

Work that needs attention:

Upgrade some lightingSome electrical workWork on part of the boundary wallRe-tarmac part of the playgroundAdapt the canopy above the cooking equipmentRepair the ceiling in some roomsReplace one flat roof

Suitability - this is the expenditure required to reach the Assemblys 21C standards for the schoolbased on current numbers. It was noted originally that the sum amounted to 155,000 based oncurrent Assembly requirements.

The requirements in regard to suitability includes staff resource space and modifications to thehall. As part of the building is used less following the closure of the additional Needs Unit, it ispossible that the space can be used as part of the response, that could lead to a lower cost.

Fire WorkIt was originally reported that the spending requirement is approximately 18,000. This amount isderived from the recommendations of the fire risk assessment. Such assessments have beencompleted for each building by the Council and the work is prioritised according to risk. No workat this school is derived from any high risk.

Property Matters.pdf

8

Dalgylch maer disgyblion yn byw / Catchment where pupils live

Ysgol /School

Groeslon Carmel Bronyfoel Rhosgadfan Rhostryfan Bro Lleu Brynaerau CaernarfonCyfeiriad

ddim ar gaelCyfanswm

Total

Y Groeslon 66 0 2 3 2 0 2 0 0 75

Carmel 2 40 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 48

Bronyfoel 1 7 10 2 0 1 0 3 2 26

Arall 17 3 2

CYFANSWMY DALGYLCH

/ TOTALCATCHMENT

86 5016

% o blant y dalgylch sy'n mynychu ysgolion eraill /% of catchment area children that attend otherschools:

Dalgylch Nifer / No. %

Y Groeslon 20 23%

Carmel 10 25%

Bronyfoel 6 38%

% o ddisgyblion yr ysgol o ddalgylchoedd eraill /% of pupils in the school from other catchmentareas:

4. DISGYBLION ALL DALGYLCH / PUPILS OUTSIDE CATCHMENT AREA

Ysgol / School Nifer / No. %

Y Groeslon 9 12%

Carmel 8 17%

Bronyfoel 16 62%

Strategaeth Addysg Gynradd o'r Ansawdd Gorau i Blant Gwynedd : 4.9.1 Ein disgwyliad yw bod gan bob plentyn yr hawl i gael mynediad at addysg safonol o fewn pellter rhesymol i'r cartref

Excellent Primary Education For Children in Gwynedd Strategy :4.9.1 Our expectation is that every child will be entitled to have access to quality education within reasonable distance of the home"

Ffynhonnell: Data cyfrifiad ysgolion Medi 2012Source: Data from September 2012 school census

Pupils Outside Catchment Area.pdf

Options for discussion regarding education provision forthe Groeslon, Carmel and Bronyfoel (Fron) area

Review Panel 229 November 2012

Notes

Following a request by the Panel in the first meeting the following models were researched:

Establish a New Area School for the Groeslon, Carmel and Fron (Bronyfoel) area

Establish a Multi Site Area School for the Groeslon, Carmel and Fron (Bronyfoel) area

Develop a method of co-operation/ federation between Ysgolion Groeslon, Carmel and Bronyfoel

These options were considered against the Excellent Primary Education For Children In Gwynedd strategy.

ITEM 4 RP2

2

Area School (by closing Ysgolion Groeslon, Carmel and Bronyfoel)

Considerations Notes Advantages Disadvantages

LearningEnvironment

4.3.1. Our expectation is that the learningenvironment for the Countys children andteachers in other words the condition of theschool, the classroom, staffroom, play provision meet 21st century teaching and learningrequirements.

Buildings and facilities that are new, modern, and fit for purposefor all the children in the area. New 21st Century school with allthe relevant elements available for staff and pupils; multi purposehall, foundation phase area, outdoor play area, staff room etc.Areas pupils able to take advantage of modern provision on adaily basis.

-

Pupil Numbers

4.2.1. Our expectation is that planning for thefuture of education in different catchment-areasneeds to reflect trends in terms of population andprimary pupil numbers.

It will create a firm provision in the area to better withstanddemographic changes in the future. Reduces surplus places in thearea. Possible that fewer pupils will move out of the area, thusstabilising numbers.

-

Class Size and AgeRange

4.1.1. Our expectation is that there will beappropriately-sized classes in Gwynedd primaryschools so that children within the county acquirethe best possible experiences and opportunities.

Classes that are of an appropriate size with less of an age range.

-

Leadership andStaffing

4.4.1. Our expectation is that headteachers willhave a fair opportunity to provide professionalleadership and management for their schools.

More non teaching time for the headteacher to lead and manage.The budget will allow a deputy headteacher to be employed. Noneed for the headteacher to manage staff from afar. Everyonewill work on the same site. Better opportunities for staff careerdevelopment.

Need for fewer posts.

Community

4.5.1. Our expectation is that the CountysPrimary Schools serve as a focal point forcommunity-based activities, enriching pupilsexperiences and opportunities.

Brings children from different villages together to learn andsocialise. Ensures a firm education provision which will besustainable within a wider area to better withstand demographicchanges in the future. Extends opportunities for children to haveaccess to wider community facilities.

** Community Report Result**

Loss of presence of a school in two villages(measures will be taken to lessen theeffect).


Language

4.8.1 Our expectation is that all the countyspupils will have developed age-relevant bilingualskills which allows them to become fullyparticipating members of the bilingual society inwhich they live.

**Language Report Result** **Language Report Result**

Financial Factors

4.6.1. Our expectation is that Gwynedd will makethe best possible use of all financial resourcesavailable for the Countys primary education.

Opportunity to attract investment from the Welsh Government.Per pupil spending will be more equal in the area. The area schoolwill not be in the safety net. More effective provision ofresources.

Transport costs could be higher than thecurrent arrangement.

GeographicalFactors

4.9.1. Our expectation is that every child will beentitled to have access to quality education withinreasonable distance of home.

Education provision would be available within a reasonabletravelling distance.

Some pupils will travel further to school(compared to current arrangements).

3

Multi-Site Area School (Close three schools and open one school on two sites)


LearningEnvironment

4.3.1. Our expectation is that the learningenvironment for the Countys children andteachers in other words the condition of theschool, the classroom, staffroom, play provision meet 21stcentury teaching and learning requirements.

Building, facilities and resources will berenovated.

The effect of the investment would be lessened as there are twosites to develop.

Pupil Numbers

4.2.1. Our expectation is that planning for thefuture of education in different catchment-areasneeds to reflect trends in terms of population andprimary pupil numbers.

Surplus places in the area will be reduced. One site could be more fragile than the other regarding pupilnumbers. One site could be a drain on the other. Both sites willneed to be able to withstand demographic changes. Hard tomanage who receives education on which site (as it is one school).


4.1.1. Our expectation is that there will beappropriately-sized classes in Gwynedd primaryschools so that children within the county acquirethe best possible experiences and opportunities.

Class sizes will be more appropriate and therewill be less of an age range within classes.

It will not enable single age classes mixed age classes wouldremain, perhaps with an age range of 3 years in some classes.Challenge of arranging appropriate classes on two sites.


4.4.1. Our expectation is that headteachers willhave a fair opportunity to provide professionalleadership and management for their schools.

More non teaching time for headteacher to leadand manage.

Two sites to manage. Headteacher will need to manage staff fromafar. More staff for headteacher to manage.Possible to employ a deputy headteacher based on numbers, but asite manager will be needed at least.

Community


Brings children from different villages together tobe educated.Keeps a school site presence in two villages.


Loss of school presence in a village (measures will be taken tomitigate the impact).


Language

4.8.1 Our expectation is that all the countyspupils will have developed age-relevant bilingualskills which allows them to become fullyparticipating members of the bilingual society inwhich they live.

**Language Report Result****Language Report Result**

Financial Factors

4.6.1. Our expectation is that Gwynedd will makethe best possible use of all financial resourcesavailable for the Countys primary education.

Per pupil spending in the area would be moreequal.More effective provision of resources.

Uncertainty regarding the Welsh Government business case.Challenge to the governors to ensure that pupils on one site dontreceive greater funding than those on the other site.Maintenance costs are higher as there are two sites. Possible thattransport costs higher than current arrangements. Possible toemploy a deputy headteacher based on numbers, but a sitemanager will be needed at least.

GeographicalFactors

4.9.1. Our expectation is that every child will beentitled to have access to quality education withinreasonable distance of home.

No pupil in the area will have to travel anunreasonable time to school.

Some pupils will travel further to school compared to currentarrangements.

4

Developing methods of Co-operation / Federation


LearningEnvironment

4.3.1. Our expectation is that the learningenvironment for the Countys children andteachers in other words the condition ofthe school, the classroom, staffroom, playprovision meet 21st century teaching andlearning requirements.

-

No upgrading the option would not attract money from the 21C schoolsprogramme. There would not be an investment to create school(s) of 21stCentury Schools standard criteria e.g. suitable hall, headteacher room,suitable foundation phase. Condition of Ysgol Y Groeslon will continue todeteriorate and temporary buildings would need to be used.

Pupil Numbers

4.2.1. Our expectation is that planning forthe future of education in differentcatchment-areas needs to reflect trends interms of population and primary pupilnumbers.

-

One school will remain in the safety net. Over 100 surplus places willremain. Possibility that numbers in one site will fall due to the condition ofthe building. Projections in one school looks fragile in respect to numbers.


4.1.1. Our expectation is that there will beappropriately-sized classes in Gwyneddprimary schools so that children within thecounty acquire the best possible experiencesand opportunities.

-

Classes will remain to have an age range of up to 4 years.Class sizes will remain between 9-30.


4.4.1. Our expectation is that headteacherswill have a fair opportunity to provideprofessional leadership and management fortheir schools.

Staff expertise can be shared. More nonteaching time for the headteacher. Moreopportunity to strengthen and developleadership role. Opportunities to co-operateon professional matters and develop planstogether for the benefit of the pupils.

Three sites to manage. More staff to lead and manage. Staff will need to bemanaged from afar. Budget enables headteacher based on pupil numbers,however two head of sites, therefore any savings would go on running theeducation infrastructure rather than being spent on pupils. No need forthree headteachers as present (should a formal federation form).

Community


No schools will close in any village.

** Community Report Result**Uncertainty will remain regarding sustainability of education provision inthe area.


Language

4.8.1 Our expectation is that all the countyspupils will have developed age-relevantbilingual skills which allows them to becomefully participating members of the bilingualsociety in which they live.

**Language Report Result** **Language Report Result**

Financial Factors

4.6.1. Our expectation is that Gwynedd willmake the best possible use of all financialresources available for the Countys primaryeducation.

Financial Budgets will remain.Savings from the cost of two headteacherswill be spent by the school as needed.

No investment from Welsh Government will be attracted. Range in per pupilspending will remain between the schools - a range of 3,000. Highmaintenance costs of the three sites. Transport costs between sites. Budgetenables headteacher based on pupil numbers, however two head of siteswould need to be employed, therefore any savings would go on runningthe education infrastructure rather than being spent on pupils.

GeographicalFactors

4.9.1. Our expectation is that every childwill be entitled to have access to qualityeducation within reasonable distance ofhome.

No child will travel further to school.

-

5

Key:Blue = AdvantagesRed = Disadvantages

Comparing The Three Models

Considerations Area School Multi-Site Area School Co-Operation / Federation

LearningEnvironment

Buildings and facilities that are new, modern,and fit for purpose for all the children in thearea. New 21st Century school with all therelevant elements available for staff and pupils;multi purpose hall, foundation phase area,outdoor play area, staff room etc.Areas pupils able to take advantage of modernprovision on a daily basis.

Building, facilities and resources will berenovated.

The effect of the investment would be lessened asthere are two sites to develop.

No upgrading the option would not attract moneyfrom the 21C schools programme. There would notbe an investment to create school(s) of 21st CenturySchools standard criteria e.g. suitable hall,headteacher room, suitable foundation phase.Condition of Ysgol Y Groeslon will continue todeteriorate and temporary buildings would need tobe used.

Pupil Numbers

It will create a firm provision in the area to betterwithstand demographic changes in the future.Reduces surplus places in the area. Possible thatfewer pupils will move out of the area, thusstabilising numbers.

Surplus places in the area will be reduced.

One site could be more fragile than the otherregarding pupil numbers. One site could be a drainon the other. Both sites will need to be able towithstand demographic changes. Hard to managewho receives education on which site (as it is oneschool).

One school will remain in the safety net. Over 100surplus places will remain. Possibility that numbersin one site will fall due to the condition of thebuilding. Projections in one school looks fragile inrespect to numbers.


Classes that are of an appropriate size with lessof an age range.

Class sizes will be more appropriate and therewill be less of an age range within classes.

It will not enable single age classes mixed ageclasses would remain, perhaps with an age range of3 years in some classes.Challenge of arranging appropriate classes on twosites.

Classes will remain to have an age range of up to 4years.Class sizes will remain between 9-30.


More non teaching time for the headteacher tolead and manage. The budget will allow a deputyheadteacher to be employed. No need for theheadteacher to manage staff from afar. Everyonewill work on the same site. Better opportunitiesfor staff career development.

Need for fewer posts.

More non teaching time for headteacher tolead and manage.

Two sites to manage. Headteacher will need tomanage staff from afar. More staff for headteacherto manage.Possible to employ a deputy headteacher based onnumbers, but a site manager will be needed atleast.

Staff expertise can be shared. More non teachingtime for the headteacher. More opportunity tostrengthen and develop leadership role.Opportunities to co-operate on professionalmatters and develop plans together for the benefitof the pupils.

Three sites to manage. More staff to lead andmanage. Staff will need to be managed from afar.Budget enables headteacher based on pupilnumbers, however two head of sites, therefore anysavings would go on running the educationinfrastructure rather than being spent on pupils. Noneed for three headteachers as present (should aformal federation form).

Community

Brings children from different villages together tolearn and socialise. Ensures a firm educationprovision which will be sustainable within awider area to better withstand demographicchanges in the future. Extends opportunities forchildren to have access to wider communityfacilities.


Loss of presence of a school in two villages(measures will be taken to lessen the effect).

Brings children from different villages togetherto be educated.Keeps a school site presence in two villages.


Loss of school presence in a village (measures willbe taken to mitigate the impact).

No schools will close in any village.


Uncertainty will remain regarding sustainability ofeducation provision in the area.

Language **Language Report Result** **Language Report Result** **Language Report Result**

Financial Factors

Opportunity to attract investment from theWelsh Government. Per pupil spending will bemore equal in the area. The area school will notbe in the safety net. More effective provision ofresources.

Transport costs could be higher than the currentarrangement.

Per pupil spending in the area would be moreequal.More effective provision of resources.

Uncertainty regarding the Welsh Governmentbusiness case.Challenge to the governors to ensure that pupils onone site dont receive greater funding than thoseon the other site.Maintenance costs are higher as there are twosites. Possible that transport costs higher thancurrent arrangements. Possible to employ a deputyheadteacher based on numbers, but a site managerwill be needed at least.

Financial Budgets will remain.Savings from the cost of two headteachers will bespent by the school as needed.

No investment from Welsh Government will beattracted. Range in per pupil spending will remainbetween the schools - a range of 3,000. Highmaintenance costs of the three sites. Transportcosts between sites. Budget enables headteacherbased on pupil numbers, however two head of siteswould need to be employed, therefore any savingswould go on running the education infrastructurerather than being spent on pupils.

GeographicalFactors

Education provision would be available within areasonable travelling distance.

Some pupils will travel further to school(compared to current arrangements).

No pupil in the area will have to travel anunreasonable time to school.

Some pupils will travel further to school comparedto current arrangements.

No child will travel further to school.

Item 4 - PA2 Options.pdf

review panel 2 meeting agenda thursday 29 november 2012 5:00 peris meeting …€¦ · ·...

Documents