review of willi cbq

Upload: machluf

Post on 05-Feb-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/21/2019 Review of Willi Cbq

    1/3

    1973] BOOK REVIEWS AND SHORT NOTICES 565

    in the ancient world. Due to the method of publication, a xeroxed typescript,

    many typographical errors remain in the text. In some places, the author'slanguage is a bit too precious for the subject matter, e.g., "the deep structure

    of the petition" (p. 65).

    St. Michael's College, Toronto, Can. J. T. FORESTELL, C.S.B.

    THOMAS WILLI, Die Chronik als Auslegung : Untersuchungen zur literarischenGestaltung der historischen berlieferung Israels (FRLANT 106; Gttingen:

    Vanderhoeck & Ruprecht, 1972). Pp. 267. Cloth DM 55; paper DM 51.This could be called a new "Special Introduction to Chronicles." It treats

    the old tried-and-true cruxes of sources, date, and purpose ; but with a pregnantly

    "original" approach. Thus, though leaving the reader at times uncertain of

    where he stands or is heading, it contributes many items to a freshened re

    appraisal. Instead of the formerly "big" characteristics of the Chronicler (omis

    sion of the North and Elijah, and of all activities of Moses ; von Rad's levitischePredigt; Hezekiah's Passover, Manasseh's captivity, Josiah's fatal disobedience),we here see focused rather long lists of disjointed details supporting more modern

    traditions g e schichtlich assertions.There are three chapters, each curiously purporting to combine many long-churned empirical facts with a biblical leitmotif whose relevance is at best

    mystical or misty. Thus, the first chapter is entitled "YHWH'S rule in the hand

    of David's sons (2 Chr 13:5)Theme and Influence of Chronicles," and a

    brief outset bears the subtitle, "1 Chr 10: Saul's Kingship as prolegomenon to

    Israel's state history," to which in fact corresponds a three-page assertion of the

    authenticity and utter centrality of the Chronicler's first narrative verse after

    the genealogies. But virtually the whole of the chapter has nothing perceptible

    to do with its title: it is an exhaustive history of the exegesis of Chr, clear and

    normal enough except for the lengthy sympathetic attention given to someJewish commentatorsand especially Delmedigo 1591-1655, who furnishes the

    motto of the title page, "explanation is not narration," prs l' sippr.

    The second chapter is entitled, "'Abram, that is, Abraham' (1 Chr 1:27):

    Chronicles as Exegesis," {Die Chronik als Auslegung, title of the whole book).Here nothing at all is said about the Abraham citation or its relevance. Instead,

    there are four subdivisions unfolding the Chronicler's intention. This is first

    briefly inspected from some a priori categories (midrash; "Die Chronik als

    Auslegung" for the third time; discounting of corruptions in transmission).

    Thereupon, attention is directed to "the Chronicler at work": (1 ) by the

    alterations he himself introduced into the pre-existing (Kings) text; (2) by

    his adaptations, glosses, typological, and other interpretations; (3) by his

  • 7/21/2019 Review of Willi Cbq

    2/3

    566 T H E CATHOLIC BIBLICAL QUARTERLY [Vol . 35

    own reflection (pp. 54, 59; p. 187 with Mowinckel admits occasional oral

    traditions; only at the very end, p. 233, are enumerated and evaluated thevarying sources named within the Chr text itself, a strangely pre-empirical

    procedure considering the 30 pages systematically marshaling all sorts of

    secondary comments at the outset). The Chronicler's topographical adaptations

    prompt the interesting insight on p. 119, "Every writing of history perforce

    strives to update the localizationsnaturally at the risk of error."

    The third chapter is entitled, " Th e history of the prophets' [presented as a

    citation of 1 Chr 29:29 but not in fact such] and its expositorChronicles as

    late postexilic historiography." This latter element of the title is repeated for

    the middle of three subheads, the first being geistesgeschichtliche Einordnung

    (where does it fit from a cultural point of view? anti-Samaritan polemic? culticfootnotes?), and the third dealing with the relations between prophetism and

    history: "Prophet, summarizer, and exegete: primary, secondary [Kings], and

    tertiary writing of history according to the Chronicles' concept of the history

    of the transmission of traditions." The primary compiling of history is due tothe prophets who were caught up in making it, and who are cited in the twobooks of Chr so copiously. Their absence from Ezra-Neh suffices to prove

    this an entirely different work (p. 216; 180ff.; with no advertence to A.

    Fernndez' defense of this view) but not by a different author, as S. Japhet,

    VT 18 (1968) 332, and D. Freedman's nowhere-cited, CBQ 23 (1961) 441.

    Handing on of a prophetism, already recognized as "extinguished," is a

    phenomenon of the period following Alexander, during which the Chronicle

    must have been written (p. 244), and to whose over-all spiritual outlook it

    gives a good clue. This main conclusion of the book is a worthwhile new

    insight. First-rank history is what prophets do; so-called historians write this

    down; "Chroniclers" in every age manage to look original by just passing

    on what they recognize as really charismatic.

    Pontifical Biblical Institute, Rome ROBERT NORTH, S.J.

  • 7/21/2019 Review of Willi Cbq

    3/3

    ^ s

    Copyright and Use:

    Asan ATLAS user, you may print, download, or send articles for individual use

    according to fair use as defined by U.S. and international copyright law and as

    otherwise authorized under your respective ATLAS subscriber agreement.

    No content may be copied or emailed to multiple sites or publicly posted without the

    copyright holder(s)' express written permission. Any use, decompiling,

    reproduction, or distribution of this journal in excess of fair use provisions may be a

    violation of copyright law.

    This journal is made available to you through the ATLAS collection with permissionfrom the copyright holder(s). The copyright holder for an entire issue of a journal

    typically is the journal owner, who also may own the copyright in each article. However,

    for certain articles, the author of the article may maintain the copyright in the article.

    Please contact the copyright holder(s) to request permission to use an article or specificwork for any use not covered by the fair use provisions of the copyright laws or covered

    by your respective ATLAS subscriber agreement. For information regarding the

    copyright holder(s), please refer to the copyright information in the journal, if available,or contact ATLA to request contact information for the copyright holder(s).

    About ATLAS:

    The ATLA Serials (ATLAS) collection contains electronic versions of previously

    published religion and theology journals reproduced with permission. The ATLAS

    collection is owned and managed by the American Theological Library Association(ATLA) and received initial funding from Lilly Endowment Inc.

    The design and final form of this electronic document is the property of the AmericanTheological Library Association.