review of som revenues and allocation process new faculty orientation session october 19, 2011 s....
TRANSCRIPT
Review of SOM Revenues and Allocation Process
New Faculty Orientation SessionOctober 19, 2011
S. Dawn BulgarellaSr. Associate Dean for Administration & Finance
SOM Revenues - $569 MillionFY 2010
Federal Grants$194.2 34.1%
Other Grants$44.4 7.8%
Philanthropy$24.1 4.2%
Other$45.0 7.9%
Hospital/Health System
$81.8 14.4%
HSF$39.7 7.0%
State14.1%
IER7.4%
Tuition3.0%
“Discretionary Funds”$139.724.56%
Values are in millions
Mission-Aligned Budgeting
Missions: Teaching Research Patient Care
Budget Sources:
Tuition IER HSF ASETF Grants Hospital
SOM ASETF Allocation FY 2010
Purpose of the ASETF (state) Allocation Process
Align state funding with appropriate missions of the SOM and its departments
Develop a model that helps the Dean evaluate the performance of departments with regard to teaching, research and space utilization
Propose methods to identify and correct inequities in the historic allocation of state funding to departments
Allocation Model for SOM/JHS Depts
Departmental infrastructure 7.5% Size of Faculty (FTEs) 7.5% Teaching Efforts 35% Research Productivity 35% Dean’s discretion 15%
Space costs are factored into final allocation Legislative earmarks are respected outside of the model Basic and Clinical departments are treated the same in
the model
Teaching Subcomponent of the Model
Teaching (35% overall)
- Graduate teaching : credit for graduate students registered/mentored; # of didactic credit hours; # PhDs conferred
- Medical teaching : credit for # of course or clerkship directors; faculty contact hours in MS1&2; contact weeks in MS3&4; mentorship of scholarly activity
- T-series & R21s: credit for NIH training grants
- Post-docs & Residents : credit for headcount
-
Research Subcomponent of the Model
Research (35% overall)
- Total expenditures : credit for total expenditures on extramural funding as a market share across the School – incentivizes grants awarded
- Extramural salary coverage : credit for extramural salary support as a market share across the School – incentivizes collaboration on grants
Accountability for Space Space is assigned to departments and charged back at three
different rates per square foot per year: research space (~$24), admin space (~$15), and clinical space (~$18)
If a department generates sufficient indirect costs to cover the space costs assigned to them, it is held harmless in the allocation
If a department does not cover its space costs via generation of indirect costs, the ASETF allocation is reduced accordingly
Discretionary 15% (~$7.65M) of the allocation of state
dollars to departments is based on Dean’s discretion – primarily now determined by quality and special circumstances as discussed with the Dean by the chairs.
SOM State Appropriation History:Includes Operations and Special Program Support
State Support Principles Protect core missions
Education Research Patient Care/Service
Continued investment in areas of strategic priority Assessment of primary revenue streams (i.e., IER,
HSF/Health System, Philanthropy) for new opportunities to improve operations and strategic growth
Improve productivity and efficiency where possible
A Glass Half-Full Perspective
Every other medical school will be negatively impacted by the current economy – some will figure out how to weather, and even competitively strike, during this down time
UAB ranks 14th in “support from parent institution” among 125 medical schools
In Conclusion Our Allocation Model is complicated, but
tested and transparent We believe that we are rewarding the
behaviors that fulfill the School’s mission The SOM and its departments are well
supported relative to our peer institutions
But, Is There Enough Institutional Funding In Departmental Budgets
to Support Growth
Yes, if we are Productive & Efficient:
- extramural funding thresholds are met and maintained (probably 55-70%)
- faculty reasonably participate in teaching (Medical School and Graduate School)
- departments are efficiently operated (i.e., spending less than 35-40% of state funding on things other than faculty salaries
Questions?
Thank you!