review of instrumentation control valves and the control loop-2011

24
A Review of Process Instrumentation, Control Valves, and the Control Loop CM4120 Unit Operations Lab January 2011 1

Upload: charles-ipan

Post on 10-Oct-2014

31 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

A Review of Process Instrumentation, Control Valves, and the Control

LoopCM4120

Unit Operations LabJanuary 2011

1

Page 2: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

Outline

Process Instrumentation ReviewA look at Regulatory Control ValvesWhat is a Control Loop?PID Controllers and terminology

2

Page 3: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

3

Temperature Measurement

Thermocouples•low cost sensor

•needs transmitter/readout

•-440 to 5000ºF, typically 1 to 2ºF accuracy

•wide temperature range for various types

•rugged, but degrades over time

•many modern transmitters can handle T/C or RTD

Page 4: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

4

Temperature Measurement

RTD’s•-300 to 1150ºF, 0.1ºF accuracy or better

•more fragile, expensive than T/C

•very stable over time

•wide temperature range

•also needs readout/transmitter

Page 5: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

5

Pressure Measurement

Pressure Transmitters•available in gage pressure, absolute pressure and differential pressure

•typically 0.075% range accuracy

•50:1 turndown

•same transmitter and sensor body as in dP flow measurement and dP level

Page 6: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

6

Flow Measurement

Differential Pressure – Orifice Meter

•well-characterized and predictable

•causes permanent pressure (energy) loss in piping system, typically 8 ft. head loss (3 to 4 psi loss)

•5:1 rangeability

•requires straight run of 20 pipe diameters upstream, 5 downstream

•suitable for liquid, gas, and steam

•accuracy is 1 to 2% of upper range

Page 7: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

7

Flow Measurement

Turbine Flow Meter•accuracy is 0.25% of rate

•good for clean liquids, gases

•5 to 10 pipe diameters upstream/downstream

•10:1 turndown

•3 to 5 psig pressure drop

Page 8: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

8

Flow Measurement

Magnetic Flow Meter (Mag Meter)

•0.4 to 40 ft/s, bidirectional

•accurate to 0.5% of rate

•fluid must meet minimum electrical conductivity

•head losses are insignificant

•good for liquids and slurries

•upstream/downstream piping does not effect reading

•linear over a 10:1 turndown

Page 9: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

9

Flow Measurement

Vortex Flow Meter•suitable for liquids, steam, and gases

•must meet min. velocity spec

0.5 to 20 ft/sec range for liquid

5 to 250 ft/sec for gases

•non-clogging design

•not suitable if cavitation is a problem

•accuracy is ½% of rate

•up to 5 psig head loss

•linear over flow ranges of 20:1

Page 10: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

10

Flow Measurement

•used for steam, liquids, gases

•measure mass flow, density, temperature, volumetric flow

•expensive, but 0.2% of rate accuracy

•very stable over time

•100:1 turndown

•negligible to up to 15 psig head loss

Coriolis Effect Mass Flow Meter

Page 11: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

11

Level Measurement

Non-Contacting – Radar Level•suitable for liquids and solids

•foaming, turbulence, vessel walls and internals can effect signal if not installed correctly

•can use “stilling leg” if turbulence is extreme

•typically 0.1 inch accuracy

Page 12: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

12

Level Measurement

Contacting – dP Level•suitable for liquids only

•foaming and turbulence will effect signal

•can use “stilling leg” if turbulence is extreme

•typically 0.05% range accuracy

•100:1 turndown

•uses same dP transmitter as in dP flow measurement

Page 13: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

Regulatory Control Valve

13

Trim setdesirable to have flow linearly proportional to valve position for good control

Actuator(F.O. or F.C.?)

Page 14: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

Valve Trim Inherent Characteristics

14

Quick Openingsafety by-pass typeLarge flow response when valve starts opening ismore important than linear response

Equal Percentage~ 80% of all control valvesprovides linear response to valve position

Linearused when majority of system pressure drop isdue to valve position

Page 15: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

Flow Coefficient vs. Valve Position for each Valve Characteristic

0

0.5

1

0 20 40 60 80 100Stem Position (% Open)

f(x)

=%

QOLinear

15

By definition:for Cv = 1,1 gpm flow w/1 psi pressure dropacross valve

Page 16: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

Installed Characteristic

16

Size the valve trim, then select valve characteristicw/ the most linear response:

…use Equal Percent Characteristic valve to achievea linear Installed Characteristic

0

50

100

150

200

0 20 40 60 80 100Stem Position (% Open)

Inst

alle

d Fl

ow R

ate

(GPM

)

Linear Valve

=% Valve

Page 17: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

Typical Control Loop

17

All elements of a loop have same loop number

Page 18: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

“PID” Controllers

18

Page 19: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

Review of Controller Terminology

Process Variable (PV) = Measured variable of interest, in EU

Setpoint (SP) = Desired value of the PV, in EU

Output (OP) = Controller output, 0-100%

Error = Difference between Setpoint and PV

19

Page 20: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

Relating this to our Control Loop:

20

Process Variable

Output

Setpoint

Page 21: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

Controller TerminologyPID control

Dynamic equation that is used to match the controller’s response to a measured disturbance.Goal is to minimize disturbance and return to setpointEquation is “tuned” to match process response using up to 3 tuning constants

21

Page 22: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

Controller TerminologyTuning Constants:Proportional term – Adjusts output

proportional to the error multiplied by Gain

Integral term – Added to output based on error existing over time, Reset

Derivative term – Additional adjustment to output based on rate of change of error, Rate

22

Page 23: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

Controller TerminologyController Modes of Operation:

Auto mode – Output of controller is set by PID algorithm based on features enabled and tuning parameters

Manual mode – Output is controlled by an operator (i.e. “not in control”)

Cascade mode – Output is controlled by PID but setpoint comes from the output of a “primary or master” controller

23

Page 24: Review of Instrumentation Control Valves and the Control Loop-2011

ReferencesMiller, Richard W., Flow Measurement

Engineering Handbook, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996.

Riggs, James B., Chemical Process Control, 2nd

Ed., Ferret Publishing, Lubbock, TX, 2001.Taylor Instrument Division, The Measurement of

Process Variables, no date.www.emersonprocess.com/rosemount/,

Rosemount, Inc., Oct. 2006.www.emersonprocess.com/micromotion/, Micro

Motion, Inc., Oct. 2006.www.ametekusg.com/, Ametek, Inc. Oct. 2006.

24