retention of hiv+ pregnant and breastfeeding women on universal antiretroviral therapy (option b+)...
DESCRIPTION
Retention of HIV+ pregnant and breastfeeding women on universal antiretroviral therapy (Option B+) in Malawi. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Retention of HIV+ pregnant and breastfeeding women on universal antiretroviral therapy (Option B+) in Malawi
Lyson Tenthani* & Andreas Haas*, Hannock Tweya, Andreas Jahn, Joep J van Oosterhout, Frank Chimbwandira, Zengani Chirwa, Wingston Ng’ambi, Alan Bakali, Sam Phiri, Landon Myer, Fabio Valeri, Marcel Zwahlen, Gilles Wandeler*, Olivia Keiser* for the Ministry of Health in Malawi and IeDEA Southern Africa
* equal contribution
Background
Malawi pioneered “Option B+” to prevent mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV.
(Potential) benefits• Higher PMTCT coverage • Improved PMTCT• Reduced maternal morbidity and mortality • Avoiding repeated short-course antiretroviral
exposures • Reduced transmission to serodiscordant partners
Concerns• Acceptability of ART to prevent mother-to-child
transmission• Retention and adherence among
asymptomatically HIV infected women
Methods
Facility-level data from on 21939 Option B+ patients from 540
sites
Descriptive analysis of 6 months retention
rates
Descriptive analysis of the proportion of
patients loss to follow-up per site
Meta-regression for site-level predictors of
loss to follow-up
Patient-level data from 19 sites with
EMRS
Kaplan-Meier curves for time from HIV
testing to ART start
Logistic regression & competing risk
regression for loss to follow-up
Meta-analysis & meta-regression for
site level predictors of loss to follow-up
Loss to follow-up among Option B+ patients 6 months after ART start
Site-level predictors for loss to follow-up
OR (95% CI) p-valueUrbanity 0.059 Rural 1 Mostly urban 1.29 (0.96-1.71) Urban 1.39 (0.98- 1.96) Managed 0.040 Faith-based 1 Ministry of Health 1.19 (0.94- 1.50) Private 1.17 (0.65- 2.13) Other 0.64 (0.39- 1.04) Electronic (yes/no) 1.29 (0.93- 1.77) 0.115Level of care 0.047 Health Centre 1 District Hospital 1.28 (0.97- 1.68) Central Hospital 2.70 (0.92-7.94)
Loss to follow-up among Option B+ patients 6 months after ART start
Non Electronic Electronic
Cumulative incidence of loss to follow-up
No follow-up and loss to follow-up
No follow-up visit Lost at 2nd visit Lost during months 3-8
OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p SHR (95% CI) p
ART indication
Low CD4 Stage 3/4
1 <0.00 1 <0.00 1 0·1
B+ pregnant 4.8 (4.0-5.7) 2.0 (1.5-2.7) 1.2 (0.8-1.7)
B+ breastfeeding 2.1 (1.7-2.6) 1.0 (0.6-1.4) 0.8 (0.5-1.1)
Percentage of Option B+ pregnant women with no follow-up visit
. (0.00, 44.95)with estimated predictive intervalOverall (I-squared = 93.2%, p = 0.000)
19
15
12
16
5
7
102
18
13
6
1
Cohort
8
9
17
14
411
3
.11
.24
.17
.12
.23
.05
.32
.35
.24
.29
.24
.3
B+*
.22
.31
.16
.3
.26
.26
.19
18.71 (12.95, 24.47)
4.17 (0.58, 24.35)
17.03 (12.24, 23.20)
7.46 (3.14, 16.71)
8.82 (2.87, 24.04)
10.83 (6.40, 17.77)
1.72 (0.24, 11.24)
29.51 (25.06, 34.38)43.15 (36.41, 50.15)
27.03 (20.49, 34.74)
28.35 (21.19, 36.79)
13.64 (9.06, 20.01)
11.81 (7.25, 18.67)
Percent (95% CI)
14.29 (8.09, 23.99)
29.63 (19.01, 43.02)
28.47 (21.54, 36.58)
28.89 (17.57, 43.63)
1.04 (0.15, 7.02)25.68 (21.00, 31.01)
30.00 (14.14, 52.72)
18.71 (12.95, 24.47)
4.17 (0.58, 24.35)
17.03 (12.24, 23.20)
7.46 (3.14, 16.71)
8.82 (2.87, 24.04)
10.83 (6.40, 17.77)
1.72 (0.24, 11.24)
29.51 (25.06, 34.38)43.15 (36.41, 50.15)
27.03 (20.49, 34.74)
28.35 (21.19, 36.79)
13.64 (9.06, 20.01)
11.81 (7.25, 18.67)
Percent (95% CI)
14.29 (8.09, 23.99)
29.63 (19.01, 43.02)
28.47 (21.54, 36.58)
28.89 (17.57, 43.63)
1.04 (0.15, 7.02)25.68 (21.00, 31.01)
30.00 (14.14, 52.72)
-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
* Proportion of B+ pregnant women
Time from HIV testing to ART initiation
Conclusion
• Compared to ART patients in an advanced stage of the disease Option B+ patients are at increased risk of loss to follow-up.
• Pregnant Option B+ patients are at particularly high risk to get lost.
• Most Option B+ patients who were lost started at the day of HIV testing and never came back.
• ART preparation at first visit is crucial.
• Barriers to retention in care need to be fully understood.
• Many sites with a low rate of LTF demonstrate that a good level of retention in care can be achieved.