resuscitation what works what doesnt and whats coming down the tube persoff
TRANSCRIPT
©2010 MFMER | slide-1
Jason Persoff, M.D., S.F.H.M.
Resuscitation: What Works, What Doesn’t, and What’s Coming Down the
Tube
©2010 MFMER | slide-2
Financial Disclosures
None to report
Motivational Disclosures
Explain the Gorilla Again…
• How much time did that video take?• Exactly 82 seconds
• In the hospital, how long does it take to recognize cardiac arrest?
Herlitz et al. Resuscitation 2001.Herlitz et al. Resuscitation 2001.
Are We Sure He’s Dead, Jim?
• Eberle confirmed our skills at pulse check • Sensitivity 90%
• Specificity 55%
• Accuracy 65%
• Median time needed to identify presence or absence of pulse:
• 24 seconds overall, 32 seconds for pulse absent patients
• In 2009, Tibbells confirmed we’d only gotten a little better• Sensitivity 86%
• Specificity 64%
• Accuracy 78%
• Bottom line: in controlled circumstances, we don’t know if a patient has a pulse or not
Eberle et al. Resuscitation 1996 (33)
Tibballs J and Russell Philip. Resuscitation 2009; 80: 61
Eberle et al. Resuscitation 1996 (33)
Tibballs J and Russell Philip. Resuscitation 2009; 80: 61
Clinically Futile Cycles
• Pulse Check
• Rhythm Analysis
• Failure to Simulate, Rehearse, React• “…the typical cardiac arrest victim receives a faster
response as a casino patron than they do as a hospital inpatient.”
• Adams BA, et al. Resuscitation 2009; 80: 65.
New BCLS Guidelines Emphasize What Works
Neurologically Intact Survival
(CPC 0-1)
Survival to Hospital Discharge
Return of Spontaneous Circulation
Death
CPC Status
•0 Normal•1 Good•2 Mod Disability•3 Major Disability•4 Persistent Vegetative State•Brain Death
Cerebral Performance Category
88% of all In-Hospital Cardiac Arrests Occur on Patients with DNR Status
Hodgetts et al. Resuscitation 54: 2002
Neurologically Intact Survival
(CPC 0-1)
Survival to Hospital Discharge
Return of Spontaneous Circulation
Death
CPC Status
•0 Normal•1 Good•2 Mod Disability•3 Major Disability•4 Persistent Vegetative State•Brain Death
Outcomes in VF / VT
54-76%
17-57%
58-75%
14-27% of Pediatric In-Hospital Arrests
24% of Adult In-Hospital ArrestsSamson et al. NEJM 354: 2006
Nadkarni, et al. JAMA 295: 2006
Total Surviving Neurologically
Intact ~12%
Neurologically Intact Survival
(CPC 0-1)
Survival to Hospital Discharge
Return of Spontaneous Circulation
Death
CPC Status
•0 Normal•1 Good•2 Mod Disability•3 Major Disability•4 Persistent Vegetative State•Brain Death
Outcomes in PEA / Asystole
53-52%
10-20%
61-62%
Usually preceded up to 8 hours prior to arrest by marked changes in SBP, HR, or oxygen
saturation Skrifvars et al. Resuscitation 70: 2006
Nadkarni, et al. JAMA 295: 2006
Total Surviving Neurologically
Intact ~6.8%
Untreated V-Fib/VT
Electrical Phase
0-4 minutes
High Countershock Receptivity
Circulatory Phase
4-10 minutes
CPR Needed Before Shock
Metabolic Phase
10+ minutes
Comprehensive Multisystem Approach
After Mader T,
Resuscitation 2007
Cardiac Arrest Physiology
Circulatory Collapse0-3 Mins
•Pulse Check?•Call Code?•CPR?
Code Team Arrival3-6 Mins
•How quickly does the team arrive and who leads?
CPR, Drugs, Intubation6-10 Mins
•Arrhythmia Recognition?
•Airway, Breathing•Shocks•Drugs
Code Team Begins to Integrate10+ Mins
•Kitchen Sink•Txfr or
Pronounced
Acute VF Arrest
Metabolic Phase
Electrical Phase
Circulatory Phase
Fibrillating myocardium
deplete of ATP
Losing Time, Losing Life
Weisfeldt ML and Becher LB. JAMA 2002;
288: 3035.
Decreased Survival Predictable
CPR Initiated >1-2 Minutes
After Collapse
Survival ↓↓↓↓34% to 14%
Herlitz et al.Resuscitation
49: 2001
Cooper et al.Resuscitation
68: 2006
Code Team Arrival > 3
Minutes After Collapse
Survival ↓↓↓↓Starts
@ 2MinsSurvival 0%
@ 6 Mins
Skrifvars et al. Resuscitation
70: 2006
ACLS Training Status of Nurses
SHD 31% vs. 20%
30 day26% vs. 5.9%
1 year21% vs. 0%
Moretti et al.Resuscitation
72: 2007
Quality of CPR Lots o’ Stuff
Chest Compressions
Start Now
Good Recoil
Push Hard
Pump Fast
Compressions Matter
CPR when done
perfectly provides only…
–1/3 normal cardiac output
–10-15% normal cerebral
blood flow
–1-5% normal cardiac
blood flowSanders et al. Resuscitation 1985.
Compressions Matter
• Compressions too shallow 62.6% of the time
• Compressions too slow 71.9% of the time
* p < 0 .0083
*75% 25%
ROSC No ROSC
Quartile 1
95.5 - 138.7 cpm
*24%76%Quartile 2
87.1 – 94.8 cpm
58% 42%Quartile 3
72.4 – 87.1 cpm
*42% 58%Quartile 4
40.3 – 72.0 cpm
Abella. Circulation 2005; 111:428-34
*
Compressions Matter
62%
0%
42%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
%Too Shallow
% Too Deep
%
IncompleteRelease
Wik et al. JAMA 2005: 293:299-304
The Hands Off Interval
Yu et al. Circulation 2002; 106:368-72
Physiologic Consequences
Physiologic Consequences
• Compression depth inversely correlates with likelihood of successful defibrillation
• Mechanisms of why this may happen• Rapid drops in aortic diastolic pressure
• Expansion of the right heart (compromising left ventricular size and flow)
• Delays in resuming chest compressions following defibrillation decrease ROSC and neurological intact survival
Edelson DP, et al. Resuscitation 2006; 71: 137.Yu et al. Circulation 2002; 106: 368.Chamberlain D, et al. Resuscitation 2008; 77: 10.Berg RA, et al. Resuscitation 2008; 78: 71.
Shock ‘Em
• AEDs• Widely available but with long hands-off times
• Shock ‘Em NOW!
Chan PS, et al. NEJM 2008; 358: 9.Lloyd MS, et al. Circulation 2008; 117: 2510.Op Ed: Perkins GD. Resuscitation 2008; 79: 1.
Shock ‘em Yesterday
• Risk of shock: negligible• Brave volunteers didn’t die
• Few case reports
Op Ed: Perkins GD. Resuscitation 2008; 79: 1.
Er…I Can’t Check The Rhythm Due to Compressions…So…Hands Off, Right?
• Wrong…Zoll (among other manufacturers have accelerometer pads that “zero out” compressions
Shocking
• Delayed defibrillation• Black race associated with delays in defibrillation
(p<0.001)
• Small hospital size (<250 beds)
• “After hours” (nights/weekends)
• Non-monitored bed
Chan PS, et al. NEJM 2008; 358: 9.Herlitz et al. Resuscitation 2001.
So If We Can’t Check A Pulse…?
• Continuous capnography• Increasingly appears to be predictive of excellent
perfusion
• Markers of perfusion include a sudden increase in PCO2
• Ventilations can be titrated to accommodate for EtCO2 of 35-40mmHg
Oxygen is Rapidly
Consumed
•2-4 Minutes•Asymmetric distribution
Switch to Anaerobic Metabolism
•Hepatic perfusion necessary to clear•pKa, pH and other changes change medication effects
CO2 Rapidly Rises
•Adds to acid burden•Needs lung perfusion and ventilation to
clear
Low Flow
•Functional reductions in compression-
assisted forward flow•Arteriole failure with low effective blood
volumes
Hypoxia
Circulatory
Collapse
Lactic Acidosis
Hypercarbia
Whatever Happened to the ABC’s?
“The
Drain”
New Paradigm: CCR
• “Iatrogenic hypotension”– Over-zealous BVM use due to
• Desire to correct hypoxia
• Belief that hyperventilation will correct acid-base derangements
• What is the appropriate tidal volume for a patient in cardiopulmonary arrest?
• Roughly 750cc
• What is the volume of an adult bag-valve-mask?
• 1.5 liters
• Designed for 1-handed operation
New Paradigm: CCRNew Paradigm: CCR
Michard F. Anesthesiology 2005
New Paradigm: CCR
• Phenomenon of auto-PEEP usually referred to patients on a ventilator
• Rate exceeded at least 60.9% of the time in humans
• In swine models, hyperventilation results in…• …increased intrathoracic pressure
• …decreased coronary perfusion pressures
• …lower survival
New Paradigm: CCR
•Abella. Circulation 2005; 111:428-34.
• Aufderheide, et al. Resuscitation 2004.
Oral Airways
Oral Airways
• Contraindicated in conscious patients• Can premote retching and laryngospasm
• Trauma
Why is Airway De-Emphasized?
• Patients gasp during cardiac arrest
• Gasping…• …is a forceful agonal respiration
• …is a marker of improved prognosis
• …increases cerebral blood flow
• …decreases intracranial pressure
• …improves upper airway patency
• …generates cardiac output
•Yang, et al. Crit Care Med 1994; 22: 879.
•Ristagno G, et al. Resuscitation 2007; 75: 366.
•Xie J, et al. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:238.
•Srinivasan V, et al. Resuscitation 2006; 69: 329.
•Ewy GA and Kern KB. J Am Coll of Cardiol 2009; 53:147.
GASP!!!!
Rats!
A hemorrhagic
model of PEA in rats
Suzuki M, et al. Resuscitation 2009; 80:109.
External Cooling
Cold Is Cool
• Why hypothermia?• Superoxide generation post-resuscitation
• Calcium influx into cells
• Decreased available glucose
• Increased oxidative phosphorylation
• Cooling preserves mitochondria
• The only “brain preserving” therapy post-arrest
• Hazards• Coagulopathy
• Impaired WBC function
• Decrease in cardiac index
• Hyperglycemia (Real)
• Requires• Continuous bladder or central monitoring of temperature
• Target 32-34°C
Cold is Cool
A. Aguila et al. / Resuscitation 81 (2010) 1621–1626
Cold is Cool
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Good Neuro Bad Neuro Death
Hypothermia
Normothermia
After data from SA Bernard, et al. NEJM 2002; 346: 557-63.
Cold is Cool
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Good Neuro Death
Hypothermia
Normothermia
After data from THACASG. NEJM 2002; 346: 549-56.
Cold is Cool
After THACASG. NEJM 2002; 346: 549-56.
Cold Is Cool
• Therapeutic Hypothermia• Depression in cardiac index from TH means pressors are indicated
• Maintenance of MAP 90-100mmHg
• Oddo M, et al. Crit Care Med 2006
• Paralysis is recommended but must be combined with sedation
• Paralysis is stopped once core temp is >35°C
• TH causes selective increases in CK-MB
• Standard resuscitation peak ~100 at 6 hrs
• TH resuscitation peak ~300 at 12 hrs
• Nevertheless, STEMI or suspicion of MI should NOT preclude PCI
Cold Is Cool
• Therapeutic Hypothermia• Goal: RAPID decrease in core temp to 32-34 Deg C
• Average 6 hours to achieve targets
• Oddo M, et al. Crit Care Med 2006
• Cold LR 30mL/kg bolus plus external cooling in comatose patients post-resuscitation
• Bottom Line: HIGHER CPC SCORES, SIMILAR SURVIVAL
• CPC 0-1 seen in 54% of those treated vs. 30% of controls
• Review: Bro-Jeppensen J, et al. Resuscitation 2009; 80: 171.
• Theoretical decrease in diminishment of ECG VF to asystole
• Cooling DURING arrest seems to improve ROSC, but not survival
• Pre-Arrest and Intra-Arrest Hypothermia and VF. Menegazzi JJ, et al. Resuscitation 2009; 80: 126.
Fin
Universal Algorithm
Shockable Rhythm?
Yep
V-Fib
Pulseless VT
Have no idea
Nope
PEA
Asystole
360JMono
150JBiphasic
150JBiphasic
or
5 Cycles
(150 Compressions)
Pressor (Epi vs. Vaso)
Shock
Drug
Shock
Antiarrhythmic
(Amiodarone)
Assignment #1
• You come across an unconscious patient who appears unarousable and not particularly lively. As a group, determine:
• Who will lead the code
• Determine interventions prior to defibrillator arrival
• When the defibrillator arrives, how would you set it up?
Debriefing #1
• Group leader, discuss what chaos ensued
• How did you figure out to use the defibrillator?
• How did you decide on a collective course of action?
• What areas of uncertainty existed?
• Take 2: new group leader, same exercise
VF/Pulseless VT
• Peripheral vs. Central Lines
• Precordial Thumps
• Cough CPR
• Pulse Checks
Universal Algorithm
Shockable Rhythm?
Yep
V-Fib
Pulseless VT
Have no idea
Nope
PEA
Asystole
360JMono
150JBiphasic
150JBiphasic
or
5 Cycles
(150 Compressions)
Pressor (Epi vs. Vaso)
Shock
Drug
Shock
Antiarrhythmic
(Amiodarone)
PEA: A Common Cause of Arrest
Desbiens NA, Crit Care Med 2008; 36:391.
PEA: A Common Cause of Arrest
• All patients in PEA should receive:• IVF wide open to “fill the tank”
• Patients will go into vascular collapse commonly as shock ensuesincreasing the relative vascular volume by many liters
• Oxygen
• Systemic hypoxia causes vasoconstriction of the pulmonary arteries leading to RV dysfunction and thus decreases in LV preload
• Epinephrine
• Peripheral alpha-agonist can clamp down the vessels effectively but will also increase myocardial workload via beta-agonist effects. This is a short-term fix
• Chest Compressions
• Already discussed
Assignment #2
• Your team arrives on a patient who is agonally breathing but appears to have a very faint, rapid pulse.
• At what point would you institute chest compressions?
• What interventions should you initiate immediately and why?
• Name some immediate causes that could have led to this collapse
Debrief #2
• What were the difficulties this go around in deciding course of action?
• Ultimately, what did your group decide was the etiology for the collapse and how did you approach it?
• What algorithms do you think may have helped you perform better?
Bradycardia
Tachycardia
What, No Love for CCR?
• Effect of CCR on Alveolar Collapse and Recruitment• More Atelectasis
• More Hypoxemia
• Worse Hemodynamics
• Effects Persist Even After Resumption of IPPV
• But…the pigs used were anesthetized• Markstaller K, et al. Resuscitation 2008; 79: 125.
Methyl-Prednisolone 40mg
IV after Epinephrine
Hydrocortisone 300mg qd x 7 days
Mentzelopoulos SD, et al. Arch Int Med2009; 169: 15.
Steroids
Low Relative Cortisol Levels
Sillberg VAH, et al. Resuscitation2008; 79: 380.
Wyer, et al. Ann Emergency Med 2006; 48: 86.
Koshman, et al. Ann of
Pharmacology2005; 39: 1687.
Vasopressin
Non-Adrenergic Vasoconstrictor
Sillberg VAH, et al. Resuscitation2008; 79: 380.
Yup in animals, not so in humans largely due to study design heterogeneity.
Epinephrine
plus Vasopressin
Smoke if You Got ‘Em
Sillberg VAH, et al. Resuscitation2008; 79: 380.
Epinephrine
αααα/ββββ Agonist
Resuscitation Medications
External Cooling
Cold Is Cool
• Why hypothermia?• Superoxide generation post-resuscitation
• Calcium influx into cells
• Decreased available glucose
• Increased oxidative phosphorylation
• Cooling preserves mitochondria
• The only “brain preserving” therapy post-arrest
• Hazards• Coagulopathy
• Impaired WBC function
• Decrease in cardiac index
• Hyperglycemia (Real)
• Requires• Continuous bladder or central monitoring of temperature
• Target 32-34°C
Cold is Cool
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Good Neuro Bad Neuro Death
Hypothermia
Normothermia
After data from SA Bernard, et al. NEJM 2002; 346: 557-63.
Cold is Cool
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Good Neuro Death
Hypothermia
Normothermia
After data from THACASG. NEJM 2002; 346: 549-56.
Cold is Cool
After THACASG. NEJM 2002; 346: 549-56.
Cold Is Cool
• Therapeutic Hypothermia• Depression in cardiac index from TH means pressors are indicated
• Maintenance of MAP 90-100mmHg
• Oddo M, et al. Crit Care Med 2006
• Paralysis is recommended but must be combined with sedation
• Paralysis is stopped once core temp is >35°C
• TH causes selective increases in CK-MB
• Standard resuscitation peak ~100 at 6 hrs
• TH resuscitation peak ~300 at 12 hrs
• Nevertheless, STEMI or suspicion of MI should NOT preclude PCI
Cold Is Cool
• Therapeutic Hypothermia• Goal: RAPID decrease in core temp to 32-34 Deg C
• Average 6 hours to achieve targets
• Oddo M, et al. Crit Care Med 2006
• Cold LR 30mL/kg bolus plus external cooling in comatose patients post-resuscitation
• Bottom Line: HIGHER CPC SCORES, SIMILAR SURVIVAL
• CPC 0-1 seen in 54% of those treated vs. 30% of controls
• Review: Bro-Jeppensen J, et al. Resuscitation 2009; 80: 171.
• Theoretical decrease in diminishment of ECG VF to asystole
• Cooling DURING arrest seems to improve ROSC, but not survival
• Pre-Arrest and Intra-Arrest Hypothermia and VF. Menegazzi JJ, et al. Resuscitation 2009; 80: 126.
Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome
Respect for the RRT?
• Does an RRT decrease mortality and frequency of codes: Maybe
• Yes: Downey AW, et al. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 477.
• Measured alteration in mental status
• Delay in MET call resulted in death (37% vs. 22%)
• Yes: Dacey MJ, et al. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 2076.
• Yes: Sebat F, et al. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 2568.
• Yes: Sharek PJ, et al. JAMA 2007; 298: 2267.
• No: Chan PS, et al. JAMA 2008; 300: 2506.
• Single hospital before and after intervention, no differences inmortality, but decrease in ICU admission rate
• No: MERIT Study. Crit Care Resusc 2007; 9: 206.
• MET not called for >15 mins prior to CA
Respect for the RRT
• “Why doesn’t anyone call for help?”• Buist M. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 634.
• Implementation of an RRT improves vital sign recording• Chen J, et al. Resuscitation 2009; 80: 35.
Break
Isn’t Orientation over yet????