resume - ericdocument resume ed 026 565 ac 003 129 by -piven, herman; alcabes,abraham education and...

DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 026 565AC 003 129

By -Piven, Herman; Alcabes, AbrahamEducation and Training for Criminal Justice; A Directory of Programs in Universities and Agencies

(1965-1967).'Department of Health, Educatiori and Welfare, Washington, D.C.

Pub Date UMNote-136p.Available from-Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 (S.70).

EDRS Price MF -S0.75 HC Not Available from EDRS.

Descriptors- Agencies, Continuing Education Centers, *Corrective Institutions, Court Litigation, *Directories,

Graduate Study, *Inservice Programs, *Law Enforcement, Parole Officers, Probation Officers, *Professional

Education, UniversitiesThis directory lists academic institutions and service organizations which report

major training programs for practice in corrections, law enforcement, and the courts.

Part one lists the colleges, universities, and graduate professional schools which

offer a major course of study for practice in the field of criminal justice. Part twocontains a list of crime and delinquency centers which are structurally associated with

a university and engaged in training. Criminal justice systems which conduct majorinservice training programs are listed in part three: probation/parole; correctionalinstitutions, and law enforcement systems. (n1)

iii100.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION & WELFARE

OFFICE Of EDUCATION

. THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE

..4011,111 PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT. POINTS Of VIEW OR OPINIONS

STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE Of EDUCATION

POSITION OR POLICY.

.41;:-,4111:4411Par

4 Ake A41

0

0 0

I 00

SI

40.

-

EDUCATION AND TRAINING FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE

a directory of programs in universities and agencies ( 1965-1967

BY

Herman PivenAbraham Alcabes

PILOT STUDY OF CORRECTIONAL TRAINING AND MANPOWER

U. S. DEPARTMENT OFHEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE

Social and Rehabilitation ServiceOffice ofJuvenile Delinquency and Youth Development

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We wish to thank the National Council on Crime and Delinquency,sponsors of the Pilot Study of Correctional Training and Manpower.This directory was prepared under a grant from the Office of JuvenileDelinquency and Youth Development.

The authors widh to express their appreciation to the 2,500 sdhoolsand agencies throughout the country which provided information necessaryfor this directory.

Pro ect Staff

Eileen Brower Goldie Sherman

Florenc Parkinson Johannah Turner

About The Authors

DR. HERMAN PIVEN is full-time director of the project. H hasdirected research and taught on the graduate level in social workfor a nuMber of years.

DR. ABRAHAM ALCABES is co-director of the project and is alsoengAged in teaching and research at the Columbia University Graduate

School of Social Work.

Both authors have worked as probation officers and have conducted

researdh in the correctional field. Their recent studies havfocused on developing evaluation instruments by whidh to assess the

impact of training on correctional practice.

PREFACE

Many individuals and organizations have expressed the need to

identify various types of training programs designed to prepare for

practice with delinquents and offenders. Students, faculty members,

training leaders, practitioners and others have frequently requested

information as to the location of training for specific roles in the

field of Criminal Justice. This directory attempts to provide infor-

mation of this nature in compact form. It identifies those academic

institutions and service organizations which report major training

programs for practice in correctiona, law enforcement and the courts.

ORGANIZATION OF THE DIRECTORW

Part I. Listed in Part I are colleges, universities, and graduate pro-

fessional schools which offer a major course of study for practice in

the field of Criminal Justice.

A. Educational programs in departments other than professional schools

are classified into senior and Junior colleges and designated as

follows: (1) Criminology/Social Deviance; (2) Corrections/Correctional

Administration; (3) Law Enforcement/Police Science/Police Administration;

(4) other programs designed to train for work with juvenile or adult

offenders.

B. Educational programs in graduate schools of (1) social iork,-10) clinical

psychology, (3) psychiatry, and (4) law are desigpated by specialized

courses in the classroom and field for professional practice in Criminal

Justice.

Part II. This section contains a list of Crime and Delinvency Centers

which are structurally associated with a university and engaged in

training. Their programs are designated accoiding to the academic and

practitioner personnel groups being trained.

1/ Relevant definitions used throughoutilmstudy are provided in the

introduction to each section of the directory.

-v-

Part III. Criminal Justice systems which conduct major In-Service

Training programs are listed in this section: (A) probation/Parole,

(E) correctional institutions, and (C) law enforcement systems.

Eadh is classified by governmeht lvel. Their programs are designated

according to the practitioner groups engaged in In-Srvic Training.

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

The directory is based upon data reported directly to the project

by academic institutions and Criminal Justice systems. The populations

surveyed by the project are as follows:1(

TYPE OF ORGANIZATIONNUMBER OF ORGANIZATIONS REPURN RATEsmarm RESPONDED

Colleges and universities (otherthan professional schools) si 838 602 72

Professional schoolsSocial work 58 50 86Clinical psychology 67 46 70

Psychiatry 234 191 82

Law 133 87 65

University Crime and DelinquencyCenters IV 28 27 96

Criminal Justice systemsProbation and parole 1,647 807 49Correctional institutions 920 335 36Law enforcement .....222, ....da. 41

Total 4,684 2,453 5/ 52

Does not include small number of late returns excluded from computeranalysis.

1/Forty-seven additional organisations wer initially identified asCenters in the Moreton, and 46 of these responded to the survey.They are excluded here because their responses Showed them to beregular academic departments of the university or organisations otherthan Crime and Delinquency Centers.'

i1/Study populations and peocedures are described briefly in Appendixes

A to F. For detailed findings and descriptions of study populations, seeBerman liven and Abraham Alcabes, Education Training, and Manpower InCorrections And Law Enforcement (Wishington, .C.: U.S. -Department of loath,iducation and Welfare, Office of Juvenile Delinquency and Youth Develop-ment, 1966), Volumes I-IV. See also Volumes V and VI, forthcoming.

-vi-

It is likely that some additional training programs which meet study

criteria are offered by organizations not listed in the directory. There

are three possible reasons why sudh organizations are omitted: (1) the

organization initiated a new training program since the surveys were

completed; (2) the organization was not included among the project populations

for survey; (3) the organization did not respond to project questionnaires.

It is our hope that subsequent publications of the Criminal Justice

training directory will include an even more complete list of training

organizations and programs than is provided in this initial edition.

Herman Piven and Abraham Alcabes

CONTENTS

PREFACE

Organization of the Directory 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 411 410 411 411 411 411 411 41 411 411 411 411 411 411

Sources of Information

ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS CWFERING COURSES OF STUN

FOR THE FIELD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE.- PART I

COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES - Introduction

Senior Colleges - List of Programs

Junior Colleges - List of Programs

V

2

3

16

PROFFSSIONAL SCHOOLS

Graduate Schools of Social Work - Introduction 25

List of Programs .Graduate Schools with Doctoral Programs

in Clinical Psychology - Introduction 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41

List of Programs

Psychiatric Residency Centers - Introduction 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41

26

31

32

33

List of Programs ...... 34

Schools of Law - Introduction 41 0 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 0 40 40 40 40 40 do 50

List of Programs ....UNIVERSITY CRIME AND DELINQUENCY CENTERS OFFERING

TRAINING FOR THE:FIELD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE - PART II

51

Introduction ,.........". 58

List of Programs ................................................ 60

CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCIES CONDUCTING MAJOR

IN-SERVICE TRAINING PROGRAMS - PART III

PROBATION/PAROLE SYSTEMS - Introduction ........... 66

Federal - List of Programs ... 68

State - List of Programs ...................................... 69

County and Municipal - List of Programs ....... 72

CORRECTIONAL INSTINTIDN SYSTEMS - Introduction ...................

State - List of Programs ..............................

County and MUnicipal - List of Programs .........................

Private Institutions For Juvenile Offenders -List of Programs

75

77

82

83

LAW ENFORCEMENT SYSTEMS - Introduction ............................ 84

Federal - List of Programs .. ..................... ***** .......... 86

State - List of Programs ....................................... 87

County and Municipal - List of Programs ......................... 89

97A. Colleges and Universities ......................................

B Professtonal Schools 103

C. University Crime and Delinquency Centers 107

D. -Probation/Parole Systems 111

E. Correctional Institution Systems 117

F. Law Enforcement Systems 123

PAIR I

MADE= INSTITUTIONS OFFERING COURSES OF STUDYFOR TEE FIEM OF CRDENAL JUSTICE

se

COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES OFFERING A CONCENTRATIONIN THE CRIME AND DELINQUENCY FIELDS

(1965/66 AND 1966/67) 2/

Introduction

This section lists academic institutions and departments, other

than graduate professional edhoole, which report that they offer a

concentration ("twelve or more credit hours in a defined program of

study")if in one or more of the Crime and Delinquency fields.

The four types of Crime and Delinquency concentration were de-

fined as follows:

(1) Criminology/Social Deviance - the study of causes and

responses to crime and delinquency as aocial or peychological

phenomena

(2) Corrections/Correctional. Administration - the practice and

administration of programs for prevention, control, and

treatment of offenders

(3) Law Enforcement/Police Science/Police Administration - the

practice and administration of programs for detection and

apprehension of offenders

(4) "Other" educational programs designed to train students for

work with juvenile or adult offenders

The list which follows is separated by college level. All 96 senior

colleges listed have regional accreditation)/ Twelve of the 75 junior

colleges listed do not have regional accreditation and are identified

1accordingly.

2/

y See Appendix A for a summary of study method and a description ofcolleges and universities surveyed by the project.This would constitute at least a minor program of study in mostcolleges.

1/According to Lovejoy's College Guide, (80 edition, 1966).-5/ These institutions are designated by the symbol (J2).

-2-

1. SENIOR COLLEGES

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SCHOOL

1. Arizona State

University

Tempe, Arizona

2. Arizona State

College

Flagstaff, Arizona

3. University of

Arkansas

Fayetteville,

Arkansas

4. California State

College

Los Angeles,

California

5. Chapman College

Orange, California

DEPARTMENT

Sociology

Police Science

and

Administration

Social Welfare

Police Science

and

Administration

Sociology

Sociology and

Social Welfare

6. Chico State College

Social Welfare

Chico,California

and Corrections

PAM I - SECTION A

CRIMINOLOGY/

SOCIAL

DEVIANCE

U & G

CONCENTRATION AND DB3REELamy

LAW

ENFORCEMENT/

CORRECTIONS/

POLICE SCIENCE/

CORRECTIONAL

POLICE

ADMINISTRATION

ADMINISTRATION

U & G

OTHER

MENTIONED

CONCENTRATIONSY

Social Welfare - U

. Social Welfare - U

U & G

Sociology and

Social Welfare - U

1.1Symbols used to designate level ofConcentration: U = Undergraduate program only;

G = Graduate program only;

U &G = Both undergraduate and giaduate programs.

2/ Concentrations other than (1) Criminology/Social Deviance, (2) Corrections/CorrectionalAdministration, (3) Law

Enforcement/Police Science/Police Administration mentioned by responding institutions as "designedto train for

work with juvenile or adult offenders." (Excludes programs in graduate professionalschools of social work,

law, clinical psychology and psychiatry.)

1. SENIOR COLLEGES

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SCHOOL

7. Fresno State College

Fresno, California

8. La Sierra College

La Sierra,

California

9. Long Beach State

College

Long Beach,

California

DEPARTMENT

Criminology

Behavioral

Sciences

Sociology

CRIMINOLOGY/

SOCIAL

DEVIANCE

Police Science

and Administration

10. Pepperdine College

Sociology

U & G

Los Angeles,

California

11. Sacramento State

Police Science

U & G

College

and

Sacramento,

Administration

California

12. San Diego State

Sociology

College

San Diego,

California

13. San Francisco

Social Welfare

State College

San Francisco,

California

Sociology

U & G

CONCENTRATION AND DEGREE LEVEL

LAW

ENFORCEMENT/

CORRECTIONS/

POLICE SCIENCE/

CORRECTIONAL

POLICE

ADMINISTRATION

ADMINISTRATION

U & G

U & G

G*

*Programs initiated in the academic year 1966167 are identified by an asterisk.

U & G

U & G

OTHER

MENTIONED

CONCENTRATIONS

Counseline

Behavioral Science

Social Welfare - U

1. SENIOR COLLEGES

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SCHOOL


LAW

ENFORCEMENT/

CRIMINOILIGT/

CORRECTICWS/

POLICE SCIENCE/

OTHER

SOCIAL

CORRECTIONAL

POLICE

MENTIONED

DEPARTMENT

DEVIANCE

ADMINISTRATION

ADMINISTRATION

CONCENTRATIONS

14. San Jose

Law Enforcement

State College

and Administration

GI*

San Jose,

California

Sociology/

U & G

U & G

Social Service

Anthropology

15. University of

School of

U & G

U & G

U & 0

California

Criminology

Berkeley,

California

16. University of

Sociology

Sociology

California

Santa Barbara,

California

17. University of

Sociology

Sociology

Redlands

Redlands,

California

18. Regis College

Sociology

Sociology

Denver, Colorado

19. University of

Sociology

Colorado

Boulder,Colorado

20. Florida State

Criminology

U & G

U & G

U & G

Criminalistics

University

and Corrections

Tallahassee,

Florida

1. SENIOR COLLEGES

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SCHOOL

21. University of

Georgia

Athens,Georgia

22. Valdosta State

College

Valdosta,

Georgia

23. Bradley University

Peoria, Illinois

24. DePaul University

Chicago, Illinois

25. Roosevelt University

Chicago, Illinois

26. Southern Illinois

University

Carbondale,

Illinois

27. University of

Illinois

Urbana, Illinois

28. Wheaton College

Wheaton, Illinois

29. Anderson College

Anderson,

Indiana

DEPARTMENT

Sociology/

Anthropology

Sociology

Sociology

Sociology

Sociology/

Anthropology

Center for Study

of Crime,

Delinquency

and Corrections

Socioloa

Sociology/

Anthropology

Sociology and

Social Work

Sociology and

Social Work

CRIMINOLOGY/

SOCIAL

DEVIANCE

U & G

U & G

U & G


LAW

ENFORCEMENT/

CORRECTIONS/

POLICE SCIENCE/

CORRECTIONAL

POLICE

ADMINISTRATION

ADMINISTRATION

U & G

Degree Level

Unspecified*

OTHER

MENTIONED

CONCENTRATIONS

Sociology

Social Welfare - U

Sociology

(pre-Social Work)

Social Work - U

1. SENIOR COLLEGES

NAME AND LOCATION

OF. SCHOOL

30. Indiana University

Bloomington,

Indiana

31. Drake University

Des Mbines

Iowa

32. Mount Mercy College

Cedar Rapids,

Iowa

I33. Simpson College

Indianola,

Iowa

34. University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa

35. Kansas State College

of Pittsburg

Pittsburg, Kansas

36. University of Kentucky

Lexington,

Kentucky

37. University of

Louisville

Louisville,

Kentucky

38. University of

Maine

Orono, Maine

39. College of Notre

Dame of Maryland

Baltimore,

Maryland

DEPARTMENT

Police

Administration

Sociology

Social Science

Sociology

Sociology*

Social Service

and Psychology

Sociology

Southern Police

Institute

Sociology/

Anthropology

socioloa


LAW

ENFORCEMENT/

CRIMINOLOGY/

CORRECTIONS/

POLICESCIENCE/

OTUR

SOCIAL

CORRECTIONAL

POLICE

MENTIONED

DEVIANCE

ADMINISTRATICN

ADMINISTRATION

CONCENTRATIONS

U & G

Social Service

Sociology

Law Ehforcement and.

Corrections(combined)*

Social Work - U

Unspecified*

Pre-Social Work

Social Welfare

Sequence - U

1

co

1. SENIOR COLLEGES

NAME AND LOCAT

OF SCHOOL

ON

40. Boston University

Boston,

Massachusetts

41. Albion College

Albion,

Michigan

42. Marygrove College

Detroit,

Michigan

43. Michigan State

University

East Lansing,

Michigan

44. University of

Michigan

Ann Arbor,

Michigan

45. Wayne State

University

Detroit, Michigan

46. Western Michigan

University

Kalamazoo,

Michigan

47. Bethel College

Saint Paul,

Minnesota

'41

CRIMINOLOGY/

SOCIAL

DEVIANCE

DEPART

Sociology

Sociology

Sociology

School of Police

Administration

and Public Safety

Sociology

Sociology/

Anthropology

Sociology/

Anthropology

Sociology/

Anthropology

Social Science

Division

U & G

U & G


LAW

ENFORCEMENT/

CORRECTIONS/

POLICE SCIENCE/

CORRECTIONAL

POLICE

ADMINISTRATION

ADMINISTRATION

U & G

U & G

U.

OTHER

MENTIONED

CONCENTRATIONS

Sociology

Sociology

Delinquency

Prevention and

Control

Social Welfare - U

Pre-Social Work

1. SENIOR COLLEGES

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SCHOOL

48. Mankato State

College

Mankato,

Minnesota

49. University of

Minnesota

Minneapolis,

Minnesota

50. University of

Montana

Missoula, Montana

University of

Nebraska

Lincoln, Nebraska

52. University of Omaha

Omaha, Nebraska

53. University of

Nevada

Reno, Nevada

54. John Jay College

of Police Science

City University of

New York

New York, New York

51.

55. City College of the

City University of

New York

New York, New York

DEPARTMENT

Sociology

Sociology

CRIMINOLOGY/

SOCIAL

DEVIANCE

Sociology,

Anthropology, and

Social Welfare

Sociology

Law Enforcement

and Security

Sociology

Division of

Social Science

Division of

Social Sciences

Sociology/

Anthropology

U & G

a


LAW

ENFORCEMENT/

CORRECTIONS/

POLICE SCIENCE/

CORRECTIONAL

POLICE

ADMINISTRATION

ADMINISTRATION

U.

OTHER

MENTIONED

CONCENTRATIONS

Social Welfare - U

Delinquency

Social Work - U

1. SENIOR COLLEGES

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SCHOOL

DEPARTMENT

56. New York University

Sociology

New York,

New York

Public

Administration

Sociology*

57. Notre Dame College

of Staten Island

Staten Island,

4, 0

New York

58. Rosary Hill College

Sociology

Buffalo,

New York

59. Saint Bonaventure

University

Saint Bonaventure,

New York

60. State University

Sociology

College at Buffalo

Buffalo, New York

61. University of

North Carolina

at Greensboro

Greensboro,

North Carolina

62. Bowling Green

State University

Bowling Green, Ohio

Social Science

Sociology/

Anthropology

Sociology

Sociology

CRIMINOLOGY/

SOCIAL

DEVIANCE

U & G


LAW

ENFORCEMENT/

CORRECTIONS/

POLICE SCIENCE/

CORRECTIONAL

POLICE

ADMINISTRATION

ADMINISTRATION

a

U&G*

OTHER

MENTIONED

CONCENTRATIONS

Social Work - U

Sociology of Law-

Crime*

Unspecified

Sociology

Sociology

(pre-Social Work)

1. SENIOR COLLEGES

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SCHOOL

63. Capital University

Columbus, Ohio

64. Defiance College

Defiance, Ohio

65. Kent State

University

Kent, Ohio

66. Ohio Northern

University

Ada, Ohio

67. Ohio State

University

Columbus, Ohio

68. Ohio University

Athens, Ohio

69. Youngstown

University

Youngstown, Ohio

70. Oklahoma State

University

Stillwater,

Oklahoma

71. Albright College

Reading,

Pennsylvania

DEPARTMENT

Sociology

Sociology/

Psychology

Political

Science - Law

Enforcement

Program

Sociology/

Psychology

Sociology

Sociology/

Anthropology

Police Science/

Sociology

Sociology

Sociology

CRIMINOLOGY/

SOCIAL

DEVIANCE

U & G

U & G


LAW

ENFORCEMENT/

CORRECTIONS/

POLICE SCIENCE/

CORRECTIONAL

POLICE

ADMINISTRATION

ADMINISTRATION

OTHER

MENTIONED

CONCENTRATIONS

Sociology

(Social Welfare-U)

Pre-Social Work

Social Welfare - U

Social Work - U

1. SENIOR COLLEGES

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SCHOOL

72. Holy Family College

Philadelphia,

Pennsylvania

73. Temple University

Philadelphia,

Pennsylvania

74. Thiel College

Greenville,

Pennsylvania

75. University of

Pennsylvania

Philadelphia,

Pennsylvania

76. Villanova University

Villanova,

Pennsylvania

77. Winthrop College

Rock Hill,

South Carolina

78. Lincoln Memorial

College

Harrogate,

Tennessee

79. Memphis State

University

Memphis,

Tennessee

DEPARTMENT

Ftychology

Sociology

Sociology

Sociology

Sociology

Sociology

Sociology/

Anthropology

Sociology/

Anthropology*

CRIMINOLOGY/

SOCIAL

DEVIANCE

U & G

CONCENTRATION AND DEGRZE LEVEL

LAW

ENFORCEMENT/

CORRECTIONS/

POLICE SCIENCE/

CORRECTIONAL

POLICE

ADMINISTRATION

ADMINISTRATION

U & G

U & G

OTHER

MENTIONED

CONCENTRATIONS

Psychology

Sociology

Sociology

(pre-Social Work)

Sociology

Probation-Parole*

1. SENIOR COLLEGES

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SCHOOL

80. University of

Tennessee

Knoxville,

Tennessee

81. Bishop College

Dallas, Texas

4 82. North Texas

)ri

State University

Denton, Texas

83. Pimirie View

A & M College

Prairie View,

Texas

84. Sam Houston State

Teachers College

Huntsville,

Texas

85. Texas Wesleyan

College

Fort Worth,

Texas

86. Trinity University

San Antonio,

Texas

87. College of

Southern Utah

Cedar City, Utah

DEPARTMENT

Sociology

Sociology

Sociology

Sociology

Government

Sociology

Institute of

Contemporary

Corrections and

The Behavioral

Sciences

Sociology

Sociology'

Technical

Education


LAW

ENFORCEMENT/

CRIMINOLOGT/

CORRECTIONS/

POLICE SCIENCE/

OTHER

SOCIAL

CORRECTIMAL

POLICE

MNTIONED

DEVIANCE

ADMINISTRATION

ADMINISTRATION

CONCENTRATIONS

Degree Level

Unspecifiee

U & G

U*

U & G

U & G

Public

Administration

Social Welfare - U

Pre-Social Work

Social Problems'

Psychology

1. SENIOR COLLEGES

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SCHOOL

DEPARTMENT

88. University of Utah

Sociology

Salt Lake City,

Utah

89. Utah State Univ. of

Sociolocy

Arg. & Applied Sci.

Logan, Utah

90. Virginia State

Sociology

College

Norfolk Division

Norfolk, Virginia

Eastern Washington

Sociology

State College

Cheney, Washington

92. Seattle University

Sociology

Seattle, Washington

93. Washington State

University

Pullman, Washington

Sociology

CRIMINOLOGY/

SOCIAL

DEVIANCE

U & G

Police Science

U & G

Sociology

94. University of

Sociology

Washington

Seattle, Washington

U & G

U & G


LAW

ENFORCEMENT/

CORRECTIONS/

POLICE SCIENCE/

CORRECTIONAL

POLICE

ADMINISTRATION

ADMINISTRATION

Degree Level*

Unspecified

U & G

OTHER

MENTIONED

CONCENTRATIONS

Helping Services

Emphasis

Delinquency

Prevention

Social Work - U

Social Welfare - U

Sociology

1. SENIOR COLLEGES


LAW

ENFORCEMENT/

CRIMINOLOGY/

CORRECTIONS/

POLICE SCIENCE/ OTHER

NAME AND LOCATION

SOCIAL

CORRECTIONAL

IOLICE

MENTIONED

OF SCHOOL

DEPARTMENT

DEVIANCE

ADMINISTRATION

ADMINISTRATION CONCENTRATIONS

95. West Virginia

Social Work

Social Work

-U

University

Mbrgantown,

West Virginia

96. University of

Sociology

Social Work

-U

Wyoming

Laramie, Wyoming

2. JUNIOR COLLEGES

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SCHOOL

1.

Phoenix College

Phoenix, Arizona

2.

Allan Hancock

College

Santa Maria, Calif.

3.

Bakersfild Junior

College

Bakersfield, Calif.

4.

Barstow

College

Barstow, Calif.

5.

Cabrillo College

Aptos, Calif.

6.

Cerritos College

Norwalk, Calif.

7.

Chabot College

Hayward, Calif.

DEPARMiNT

Police Science

Law

Enforcement

Police Science

Law

Enforcement

Police Science

Police Science

Police Science

CRININOLOGT/

SOCIAL

DEVIANCE

CONCENTRATION

CORRECTIONS/

CORRECTIONAL

ADMINISTRATION

Us

LAW

ENFORCEMENT/

IVLICESCIENCE/

POLICE

ADMINISTRIMION

OTHER

MENTIONED

CONCENTRATIONW

Concentrations other than (1) Criminology/Social Deviance,

(2) Corrections/Correctional Administration,

(3) Law Enforcement/Pblice Science/Fblice

Administration mentioned by responding institutions as

"designed to train for work with juvenile oradult offenders."

Programs initiated in theacademic year 1966/67 are identified by an asterisk.

2. JUNIOR COLLEGES

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SCHOOL

8.

Chaffey

College

Alta Loma, Calif.

9.

City College of

San Francisco

San Francisco, Calif.

10. Coalinga

College

Coalinga, Calif.

11. College of Marin

Kentfield, Calif.

12. Compton College

Compton, Calif.

13. Contra Costa

College

San Pablo, Calif.

14. Diablo Valley

College

Concord, Calif.

15. East Los Angeles

College

Los Angeles, Calif.

CRIMINOLOGT/

SOCIAL

DEPARTMENT

DEVIANCE

Police Science

Correctional

Science

Social Science &

Correctional Science

Criminology

Pblice Science

Police Science

Police & Fire

Science

Police Science

Police Science

Police Science

CO

NC

EN

TR

AT

ION

ODRRECTIONS/

CORRECTIONAL

ADMINISTRATION

Us

LAW

ENFORCEKENT/

POLICE SCIENCE/

POLICE

ADMINISTRATION

V

OTHER

MENTIONED

CONCENTRATIONS

2. JUNIOR COLLEGES

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SCHOOL

16. El Camino Junior

College

El Camino College,

Calif.

17. Foothill College

Los Altos Hills,

Calif.

18. Fresno City College

Fresno, Calif.

19. Fiallerton Junior

College

Fullerton, Calif.

20. Gavilan College

Gilroy, Calif.

21. Grossmont College

El Cajon, Calif.

22. Lassen College

Susanville, Calif.

23. Los Angeles City

College

Los Angeles, Calif.

24. Los Angeles Valley

College

Van Nuys, Calif.

DEPARTMENT

Police Science

Law

Enforcement

Education

Police Science

Police Science

Police Science

Police Science

Police Science

Law & Police

Science

Police Science

CRIMINOLOGY/

SOCIAL

DEVIANCE

CONCENTRATION

CORRECTIONS/

CORRECTIONAL

ADIUNISTRATION

LAW

ENFORCEMENT/

POLICE SCIENCE/

POLICE

AMINISTRATION

OTHER

MENTIONED

CONCENTRATIONS

2. JUNIOR COLLEGES

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SCHOOL

25. Mbdesto Junior

College

Mbdesto, Calif.

26. Monterey

Peninsula College

Monterey, Calif.

27. Mt. San Antonio

College

Walnut, Calif.

28. Orange Coast College

Costa Mesa, Calif.

29. Pasadena City College

Pasadena, Calif.

30. Porterville College

Porterville, Calif.

31. Rio Hondo Junior

College (J2)

Santa Fe Springs,

Calif.

32. Riverside City College

Riverside, Calif.

DEPARTMENT

Law

Enforcement

Adult Education

Correctional

Administration

Police Science

Social Science

Police Science*

Public Safety

& Service

%lice Science

Police Science

Social Science

Police Science

Police Science

CRIMINOLOGY/

SOCIAL

DEVIANCE

CONCENTRATION

CORRECTIONS/

CORRECTIONAL

ADMINISTRATION

LAW

ENFORCEMENT/

POLICE SCIENCE/

POLICE

ADMINISTRATION

OTUR

?MENTIONED

CONCENTRATIONS

Social Welfare - U

Police

Supervisory*

Social Work &

Pnyclhology

discipline) - U

(J2) denotes junior college not regionallyaccredited according to Loveiov's Colleke Guide (8 * edition, 1966).

2. JUNIOR COLLEGES

NAYS AND LOCATION

OF SCHOOL

33. Sacramento City

College

Sacramento, Calif.

34. San Diego

Junior College

San Diego, Calif.

35. San Joaquin Delta

College

Stockton, Calif.

36. San Jose City College

San Jose, Calif.

37. Santa Ana College

Santa Ana, Calif.

38. Santa Barbara City

College

Santa Barbara, Calif.

39. Santa Monica City

College

Santa Monica, Calif.

40. Santa Rosa Junior

College

Santa Rosa, Calif.

41. Shasta College

Redding, Calif.

42. Southwestern College

Chula Vista, Calif.

43. Vallejo Junior

College

Vallejo, Calif.

DEPARTMENT

Police Science

Police Science

Police Science

Law

Enforcement

Social Science

Vocational/

Technical

Division

Police Science

Law

Enforcement

Law Enforcement*

Police Science

Police Science

Administration

Industrial-

Technical

CRIMNOLOCY/

SOCIAL

DEVIANCE

CONCENTRATION

LAW

ENMRCEMMIT/

CORRECTIONS/

POLICE SCIENCE/

CORRECTIONAL

POLICE

ADMNISTRATION

ADMINISTRATION

OTHER

MENTIONED

CONCENTRATIONS

Police Supervision*

2. JUNIOR COLLEGES

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SCHOOL

44. Ventura College

Ventura, Calif.

45. Yuba College

Marysville, Calif.

46. Trinidad State

Junior College

Trinidad, Colorado

47. New Haven College

West Haven, Conn.

48. Central Florida

Junior College

Ocala, Fla.

49. Daytona Beach

Junior College

Daytona Beach, Fla.

50. Junior College of

Broward County (J2)

Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.

51. Miami-Dade Junior

College (J2)

Miami, Fla.

52. Palm Beach Junior

College

Lake Worth, Fla.

DEPARTMENT

Police Science

Applied Arts

Law

Enforcement

Police Science

Division of

Applied Science

Law

Enforcement

Law

Enforcement

Police Science

Law

Enforcement

CRIMINOLOGY/

SOCIAL

DEVIANCE

CONCENTRATION

CORRECTIONS/

CORRECTIONAL

ADNINISTRATION

LAW

ENFORCEIIENT/

POLICE SCIENCE/

POLICE

ADMINISTRATION

U.

OTIMR

MENTIONED

CONCENTRATIMS

U.

2. JUNIOR COLLEGES

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SCHOOL

53. St. Petersburg

Junior College

St. Petersburg, Fla.

54. Boise Junior College

Boise, Idaho

55. Bloom Township

Community College

Chicago Heights,I11.

56. Baltimore Junior

College

114

h)

Baltimore, Md.

57. Montgomery

Junior College

Takoma Park, Md.

58. Delta College (J2)

University Center,

Michigan

59. Grand Rapids

Junior College

Grand Rapids, Mich.

60. Lansing Community

College (J2)

Lansing, Mich.

61. Northwestern

Michigan University

Traverse City, Mich.

DEPARTMENT

Police

Administration

Sociology

Law

Enforcement

Law

Enforcement

Pblice Science

Law

Enforcement

Public Safety

Business

Law

Enforcement

CRIMINOLOGY/

SOCIAL

DEVIANCE

Us

CO

NC

EN

TR

AT

ION

CO

RR

EC

TIO

NS/

CO

RR

EC

TIO

NA

LA

DM

INIS

TR

AT

ION

LAW

ENFORCEMENT/

POLICE SCIENCE/

POLICE

ADMINISTRATION

Us

Us

Us

OTHER

MENTIONED

CONCENTRATIONS

2. JUNIOR COLLEGES

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SCHOOL

62. Meramec Community

College (J2)

Murkwood, Mo.

63. Borough of Manhattan

Community College

New York, New York

64. Erie County

Technical Institute(J2)

Buffalo, New York

65. Mohawk Valley

Community College

Utica, New York

66. New York State Univ.

Police

Agricultural & Technical

College at Farmingdale

Farmingdale, New York

67. Westchester Community

College (J2)

Valhalla, New York

68. Cuyahoga Community

College (J2)

Cleveland, Obio

69. Community College &

Technical Institute

of Temple University

Philadelphia, Pa.

DEPARTMENT

Law

Enforcement

Correctional

Administration

Police Science

Police Science*

EVening

Division Science

Police Science

& Correctional

Administration

Law

Enforcement

Police Science

CRIMINOLOGY/

SOCIAL

DEVIANCE

CONCENTRATION

CORRECTIONS/

CORRECTIONAL

ADMINISTRATION

LAW

ENFORCEMENT/

POLICE SCIENCE/

POLICE

ADMINISTRATION

OTHER

MENTIONED

CONCENTRATIONS

Public Safety*

Industrial

Security

2. JUNIOR COLLEGES

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SCHOOL

DEPARTMENT

CONCENTRATION

LAW

ENFORCEMENT/

CRIMINOLOGY/

CORRECTIONS/

POLICE SCIENCE/

SOCIAL

CORRECTIONAL

POLICE

DEVIANCE

ADMINISTRATION

ADMINISTRATION

70. Harrisburg Area

Police Science

11

Community College

(J2)

& Administration

Harrisburg, Pa.

71. San Jacinto

Police Science

Junior College (J2)

Pasadena, Texas

72. Clark College

Police Science

Vancouver, Wash.

1 rv4-

73. Righline College

(J2)

Seattle, Wash.

Law

Enforcement

74. Milwaukee Institute

of Technology

Police Science

Technology

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

75. Casper College

Law

U*

Casper, Wyoming

Enforcement

OTHER

MENTIONED

CONCENTRATIONS

U.

GRADUATE SCHOOLS OF SOCIAL M3RK

(1965/66)

Introduction

This section lists sehools panting a master's degree in social

work which report that they offer on or more of the following special-

ized courses:

(1) Classroom courses in Corrections - defined as courses specific-

ally designed to train students for practice or administration

of programs in the prevention, care and treatment of delinquents

and criminals

(2) Classroom courses in Criminolow/Social Deviance - defined as

courses to study the causes and responses to crime and delin-

quency as social or psychologjcal phenomena

(3) Field placements in Correctional Settings - defined as student

practice in probation, parole, correctional institutions, or

other programs directed to the prevention, care and treatment

of delinquents and offenders

The 46 schools of social work which offer one or sore of the courses

described above are listed alphabetically by state.

See Appendix la for a summary of study method and a description of

social work and other graduate professional schools surveyed by

the project.

-25-

1. SCHOOLS OF SOCIAL WORK

NAME AND LOCATION,OF SCHOOL 2./

1. University of CaliforniaSchool of Social WelfareBerkeley, California (L)

2. University of SouthernCaliforniaSchool of Social WorkLos Angeles, California (L)

3. University of DenverThe Graduate School ofSocial WorkDenver, Colorado (I)

4. University of ConnecticutSchool of Social WorkHartford, Connecticut (S)

5. Howard UniversitySchool of Social WorkWashington, D.C. (L)

6. Florida State UniversitySchool of Social WelfareTallahassee, Florida (L)

7. Atlanta UniversitySchool of Social WorkAtlanta, Georgia (S)

8. University of HawaiiSchool of Social WorkHonolulu, Hawaii (S)

9. University of ChicagoSchool of Social ServiceAdministrationChicago, Illinois (L)

PART I - SECTION B

CLASS AND FIELD Comm

CLASSROOMCOURSES INCORRECTIONS

X

X

X

X

CLASSROOMCOURSES INCRIMINOLOGY/SOCIAL DEVIANCE

FIELDPLACEMENTS INCORRECTIONALSETTINGS

X

X

X

I/ Includes only those Graduate Schools of Social Work which offer a master's

degree. The size of each school is designated by an (S) for small and an

(L) for large. Small schools are defined as those which awarded 50 or less

master's degrees during the academic year 1965/66; large sohools are those

which awarded more than 50 master's degrees during the academic year 1965/66.


NAME AND LOCATIONOF SCHOOL

CLASS AND FIELD COURSES


10. Loyola UniversitySchool of Social WorkChicago, Illinois (S)

11. Indiana University XDivision of Social ServiceIndianapolis, Indiana (L)

12. State University of IowaSchool of Social WorkIowa City, Iowa (S)

13. University of Kansas XGraduate Department ofSocial WorkLawrence, Kansas (S)

14. University of Louisville XThe Raymond A. Kent School ofSocial WorkLouisville, Kentucky (S)

15. Louisiana State UniversitySchool of Social WelfareBaton Rouge, Louisiana (S)

16. TUlane UniversitySchool of Social WorkNew Orleans, Louisiana (L)

17. University of MarylandSchool of Social WorkBaltimore, Maryland (S)

18. Boston CollegeSchool of Social WorkBoston, Massachusetts (L)

19. Boston UniversitySchool of Social WorkBoston, Massachusetts (S)

20. Michigan State UniversitySchool of Social WorkEast Lansing, Michigan (S)

-27-

CLASSROOMCOURSES INCRIENOLOGY/SOCIAL DEVIANCE

X


X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

1. SCHOOLS OF SCCIAL WORK





21. University of Michigan XSchool of Social WorkAnn Arbor, Michigan (L)

22. Wayne State UniversitySchool of Social WorkDetroit, Michigan (L)

23. University of Minnesota XSchool of Social WorkMinneapolis, Minnesota (L)

24. University of MissouriSchool of Social Work andCommunity DevelopmentColumbia, Missouri (L)

25. Saint Louis UniversitySchool of Social ServiceSt. Louis, Missouri (L)

26. Washington UniversityThe George Warren Brown Schoolof Social WorkSt. Louis, Missouri (L)

27. University of Nebraska XGraduate School of Social WorkLincoln, Nebraska (S)

28. Adelphi UniversitySchool of Social WorkGarden City, Long IslandNew York (L)

29. Fordham UniversitySchool of Social ServiceNew York, New York (L)

Hunter College of The City XUniversity of New YorkSchool of Social WorkNew York, New York (S)

31. New York University XGraduate School of Social WorkNew York, New York (L)

30.

-28-

X

X

X

X

X


X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X




32. State University of X

New York at BuffaloSchool of Social WelfareBuffalo, New York (L)

33. Syracuse UniversitySchool of Social WorkSyracuse, New York (S)

Yeshiva UniversityWurzweiler School ofSocial WorkNew York, New York (S)

35. University of North CarolinaThe School of Social WorkChapel Hill, North Carolina (S)

36. Ohio State University X

School of Social WorkColumbus, Ohio (S)

37. Western Reserve UniversitySchool of Applied SocialSciencesCleveland, Ohio (L)

38. University of OklahomaSchool of Social WorkNorman, Oklahoma (S)

39. Portland State CollegeSchool of Social WorkPortland, Oregon (S)

40. University of Pennsylvania X

School of Social WorkPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania (L)

41. Our Lady of the Lake CollegeThe Worden School of SocialServiceSan Antonio, Texas (S)

42. University of Utah X

Graduate School of Social Work

Salt Lake City, Utah (L)

34.

-29-


CLASSROOMCOURSES INCRIMINC1OGY/SOCIAL DEVIANCE

FIELDPLACEMDNTS INCORRECTIONALSETTINGS

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X



43. Richmond ProfessionalInstituteSchool of Social WorkRichmond, Virginia (S)

44. University of WashingtonSchool of Social WorkSeattle, Washington (L)

45. University of WisconsinSchool of Social WorkMadison, Wisconsin (L)

46. University of WisconsinSchool of Social WorkMilwaukee, Wisconsin (L)


X

X



X


X

X

X

X

a

GRADUATE SCHOOLS WITH DOCTORAL PROGRAMS

IN CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY(1965/66) I/Introduction

This section lists schools and departments granting a Ph.D. in

clinical psychology which report that they offer one or more of the

following specialised courses:

(1) Classroom courses in Corrections - defined as courses specific-

ally designed to train students for practice or administration

of programs in the prevention, care and treatment of delinquents

and criminals

(2) Classroom courses in Criminology/Social Deviance - defined as

courses to study the causes and responses to crime and delis-

quency as social or psychological phenomena

(3) Internships in Correctional Settings - defined as student

practice in probation, parole, correctional institutions, or

other programs directed to the prevention, care and treatment

of delinquents and offenders

The 14 sdhools of clinical psychology which offer one or more of

the courses described above are listed alphabetically by state.

3/ See Appendix B for a summary of study method and a description of

clinical psychology and other graduate professional sdhools surveyed

by the project.

-31-

2. DEPARTMENTS OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY

NAME AND LOCATION


CLASSROOM

OF SCHOOLS WITH CLASSROOM COURSES IN INTERNSHIPS IN

DOCTORAL CLINICAL COURSES IN CRIMINOLOGY/ CORRECTIONAL

PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAMS 2.1 OORRECTIONS SOCIAL DEVIANCE SEIVINGS

1. Loyola UniversityChicago, Illinois (L)

2. Boston UniversityBoston, Massachusetts (L)

3. Michigan State University

East Lansing, Michigan(Size unknown)

4. Wayne State UniversityDetroit, Michigan (L)

5. University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota (L)

6. Saint Louis University X X

St. Louis, Missouri (L)

7. University of NebraskaLincoln, Nebraska (S)

8. New York UniversityNew York, New York (L)

9. University of CincinnatiCincinnati, Ohio (S)

10. Western Reserve UniversityCleveland, Ohio

11. University of Oklahoma X X

Norman, Oklahoma (S)

12. University of HoustonHouston, Texas (L)

13. University of Texas X

Austin, Texas (L)

14. University of UtahSalt Lake City, Utah (L)

X

1/ The size of each school is designated by an (S) for small and (1) for large.

Small schools are those in which five or less doctoral degrees in clinical

psychology were awarded during the academic year 1965/66; large schools

are those in which more than five doctoral degrees in clinical psychology

were awarded during the academic year.

-32-

PSYCHIATRIC RESIDENCY CNNTERS

(1965/66) I/

Introduction

This section lists psychiatric residency centers which report one

or more of the following specialized educational programs:

(1) Criminal Justice specialization - defined as specialization

in Forensic Psychiatry, Penal Pmychiatry, or other speciali-

zation for p.actice in Criminal Justice settings. These

settings include the courts, probation, parole, correctional

institutions, and other programs directed to the prevention,

care and treatment of suspected or adjudicated delinquents

and offenders

(2) Experience with offender cases - defined as direct practice

experience by the psychiatric resident with:

(a) Criminal or delinquency cases pending din-position before

the Court

(b) Adjudicated probation or parole casea

(c) Incarcerated prisoners or delinquents

(d) Drug addicts in a hospital or community program

(e) Patients in hospital facilities for the criminally insane

(f) Practice experience with other criminal or delinquency cases

The 166 Psychiatric Residency Centers which offer one or more of

the training programs described above are listed alphabetically by

state.

2/Seml Appendix B for a summary of study method and a description of

psychiatric residency centers and other graduate professional

schools surveyed by the project.

-33-

3. PSYCHIATRIC RESIDENCYCENTERS

TYPE OF CRIMINAL

JUST

ICE

SPE

CIA

LIZ

AT

ION

EXPERIENCE WITH

OT

HE

ROFFENDER CASES FC2

NAME AND LOCATION OF

FORENSIC

PENAL

MENTIONED

THE ACADEMIC YEAR

PSYCHIATRIC RESIDENCY CENTER

PSYCHIATRY

PSYCHIATRY

SPECIALIZATION

1262/66

1.

University of Alabama

Medical Center

Birmingham, Alabama

(S)

2.

U.S. Veterans Administration

Hospital

North Little Rock, Arkansas (S)

3.

University Hospital

Little Rock, Arkansas (S)

4.

Agnews State Hospital

San Jose, California (S)

5.

Camarillo State Hospital

Camarillo, California (S)

6.

Community Mental Health Services

San Francisco, California (S)

7.

Herrick Memorial Hospital

Berkeley, California

(S)

X X

8.Langley Porter Neuropsycbiatric

X

Institute

San Francisco, California (L)

9.

Letterman General Hospital

San Francisco, California (L)

X

2/Small Centers are defined as those which had five or fewer

residents completing their third year of

psychiatric training during the academic year1965/66.

Large Centers are those which had more

than five such residents.

3./ Specializations--other

than Forensic or Penal Psychiatry--for practice in Criminal Justice settings.

3. PSYCHIATRICRESIDENCY CENTERS

NAME AND LOCATIONOF

PSYCHIATRIC RESIDENCYCENTKR

WE OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE SPECIALIZATION

EXPERIENCE WITH

OTHER

OFFENDER CASES

FORENSIC

PENAL

MENTIONED

FOR THE ACADENIC

PSYCHIATRY

PSYCHIATRY

SPECIALIZATION

YEAR 1965/66

10. Mendocino

State Hospital

X

Talmage, California

(S)

11. MetropolitanState Hospital

Norwalk, California

(L)

12. Mount ZionHospital and Medical

Center

San Francisco,

California (L)

13. Pacific State

Hospital

Pomona, California

(S)

14. Patton State

Hospital

X

%.n

Patton, California

(S)

15. StanfordMedical Center and

XX

Affiliated Hospitals

Palo Alto, California

(L)

16. U.S. Naval Hospital

Oakland, California

(S)

17. U.S. VeteransAdministration

Hospital

(Sepulveda)

Los Angeles,

California (S)

18. U.S. VeteransAdministration

Hospital

Long Beach,

California (S)

19. University of

California Medical

XX

Center

Los Angeles, California

(L)

$

X X

3. PSYCHIATRIC RESIDENCY CENTERS


PSYCHIATRIC RESIDENCY =TER

20. Los Angeles County General

Hospital, Unit I

Los Angeles, California (L)

21. Fort Logan Mental Health Center

Fort Logan, Colorado (S)

22. Colorado State Hospital

Pueblo, Colorado (S)

23. U.S. Veterans Administration

Hospital

Denver, Colorado (S)

24. University of Colorado


Denver, Colorado (L)

25. Connecticut Valley Hospital

Middletown, Connecticut (S)

26. Institute of Living

Hartford, Connecticut

(Size unknown)

27. Norwich Hospital

Norwich, Connecticut (S)

28. St. Elizabeth's Hospital

Washington, D.C. (L)

29. Walter Reed General Hospital

Washington, D.C. (L)

30. University of Florida Teaching

Hospital and Clinics

Gainesville, Florida (L)

TYPE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SPECIALIZATION

OTHER

MENTIONED

SPECIALIZATION

FORDISIC

PENAL

PSYCHIATRY

PSYCHIATRY

X X X X

XX

EXPERIENCE WITH

OFFENDER CASES

FOR THE ACADEMIC

YEAR 1965/66

X





EXPERIENCE WITH

OTHER

OFFENDER CASES

FORENSIC

PENAL

MENTIONED

FOR THE ACADEMIC

PSYCHIATRY

PSYCHIATRY

SPECIALIZATNIN

YEAR 1965/66

31. Jackson Memorial Hospital

Miami, Florida (IJ

32. EMory University Affiliated Hospitals

Atlanta, Georgia

33. Medical College of Georgia Hospitals

Augusta, Georgia (S)

34. Milledgeville State Hospital

Milledgeville, Georgia (L)

35. Chicago Medical School


Chicago, Illinois (S)

36. Galesburg State Research Hospital

Galesburg, Illinois (S)

37. Illinois State Psychiatric Institute

Chicago, Illinois (L)

38. Michael Reese Hospital and

Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois (L)

39. Presbyterian - St. Luke's Hospital

XChicago, Illinois (S)


Hospital

Hines, Illinois (S)

X




TYPE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICESPECIALIZATION

FORENSIC

PENAL

PSYCHIATRY

PSYCHIATRY


Hospital (West Side)


42. University of Chicago Hospitals

and Clinics


43. Indiana University Medical Center

Indianapolis, Indiana (L)

44. Mental Health Institute

Cherokee, Iowa (S)

45. Mental Health Institute

Independence, Iowa (S)

46. State Psychopathic Hospital

Iowa City, Iowa (L)

47. University of Kansas Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas (S)

48. University of Kentucky Medical Center

Lexington, Kentucky (S)

49. University of Louisville


Louisville, Kentucky (S)

50. Menninger School of Psychiatry

Topeka, Kansas (L)

51. Charity Hospital of New Orleans

New Orleans, Louisiana (L)

OTHER

MENTIONED

SPECIALIZATION

X X

EXPERIENCE WITH

OFFENDER CASES

FOR THE ACADEMIC

YEAR 1965/66

X




52. Tulane University Affiliated

Hospitals

New Orleans, Louisiana (S)

53. Chestnut Lodge

Rockville, Maryland (S)

54. Johns Hopkins Hospital

Baltimore, Maryland (IA)

55. University of Maryland Hospital

Baltimore, Maryland

(Size unknown)

56. Sheppard and Ehoch Pratt

Hospital

Towson, Maryland (S)

57. Springfield State Hospital

Sykesville, Maryland (S)

58. U.S. NavalHospital

Bethesda, Maryland (S)

59. Austen Riggs Center

Stockbridge, Massachusetts (L)

60. Boston

City Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts (S)

61. Boston State

Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts (L)

62. Massachusetts Mental Health

Center

Boston, Massachusetts (L)

TYPE OF CRIICENAL JUSTICE SPECIALIZATION

OTUR

FORENSIC

PENAL

MENTIONED

PSYCHIATRY

PSYCHIATRY

SPECIALIZATION

X X

X

X X

EXPERIENCE WITH

OFFENDER CASES

FOR THE ACADEMIC

YEAR 1965/66

X X X X X X X X X X

3. PSYCHIATRIC

RESIDENCY CENTERS


PSYCHIATRIC RESIDENCYCENTER

63. Medfield State Hospital

Harding, Massachusetts

(S)

64. New England Center Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts

(S)

65. Metropolitan State Hospital

Waltham, Massachusetts

(S)

66. University Hospital


(S)

67. Worcester State Hospital

Worcester, Massachusetts

(S)

68. Henry Ford Hospital

Detroit, Michigan

(S)

69. Lafayette Clinic

Detroit, Michigan

(L)

70. Traverse CityState Hospital

Traverse City, Michigan

(S)

71. Wayne County

General Hospital

Zloise, Michigan

(S)

72. Ypsilanti

State Hospital

Ypsilanti, Michigan

(L)

73. Hennepin CountyGeneral Hospital

Minneapolis, Minnesota

(S)

74. Mayo Graduate School

of Medicine

Rochester, Minnesota

(L)


OTHER

FOR

EN

SIC

PEN

AL

ME

NT

ION

ED

PSY

CH

IAT

RY

PSY

CH

IAT

RY

SPE

CIA

LIZ

AT

ION

X X

X X

EXPERIENCE WITH

OFFENDER CASES

FOR THE ACADEMIC

YEAR 1965/66





75. University of Minnesota Hospitals

Minneapolis, Minnesota (L)


Hospital

Minneapolis, Minnesota (S)

77. University of Mississippi Medical

Center

Jackson, Mississippi (S)

78. Barnes Hospital

St. Louis, Missouri (L)

79: Jewish Hospital of St. Louis

St. Louis, Missouri (S)

80. Malcolm Bliss Mental Health Center


81. University of Missouri Medical

Center

Columbia, Missouri (S)

82. St. Louis State Hospital

(Missouri Institute of Psychiatry)


83. St. Louis University Group

of Hospitals


84. Western Missouri Mental Health

Center

Kansas City, Missouri (S)

85. University of Nebraska Affiliated

Hospitals

Omaha, Nebraska (L)

FORENSIC

PENAL

PSYCHIATRY

PSYCHIATRY

X X X X

OTHER

MENTIONED

SPECIALIZATION

X X

EXPERIENCE WITH

OFFENDER CASES

FOR THE ACADEMIC

YEAR 1965/66

X X X X

3. PSYCHIATRICRESIDENCY CENTERS



86. Essex County Overbrook Hospital

Cedar Grove, New Jersey

(S)

87. New Jersey Neuro-Psychiatric

Institute

Princeton, New Jersey

(S)

88. New Jersey State Hospital at

Ancora

Hammonton, New Jersey

(S)

89. New Jersey State Hospital

Greystone Park,

New Jersey (S)

9°.

New Jersey State Hospital

Marlboro, New Jersey

(S)

91. Albany MedicalCenter

Albany, New York

(S)

92. Binghamton State Hospital

Binghamton, New York

(S)

93. Bronx Municipal Hospital

Center

New York, New York (L)

94. Brooklyn State Hospital

Brooklyn, New York

95. Buffalo State Hospital

Buffalo, New York

(S)

96. Central Islip State Hospital

Central Islip, New York

(L)

97. City Hospital

Center at Elmhurst

New York City, New York

(L)


FORENSIC

PENAL

PSYCHIATRY

PSYCHIATRY

X X

OTHER

MENTIONED

SPECIALIZATION

EXPERIENCE WITH

OFFENDER CASES

FOR THE ACADEMIC

YEAR 1965/66

-

....x.a.LuziNUY CENTERS



TYPE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE

FORENSIC

PENAL

PSYCHIATRY

PSYCHIATRY

98. Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center

New York City, New York CL)

99. Creedmoor State Hospital

New York City, New York (L)

100. Edward J. Meyer Memorial Hospital

Buffalo, New York (S)

101. Grasslands Hospital

Valhalla, New York (S)

102. Harlem Hospital Center

New York, New York (S)

103. Kings County Hospital Center


104. Marcy State Hospital

Marcy, New York

(S)

105. Middletown State Hospital

Middletown, New York (L)

106. Montefiore Hospital and Medical

Center

New York City, New York (S)

107. Mount Sinai Hospital


108. New York Hospital - Westchester

Division

White Plains, New York (S)

SPE

CIA

LIZ

AT

ION

OTHER

MENTIONED

SPECIALIZATION

EXPERIENCE WITH

OFFENDER CASES

FOR THE ACADENIC

YEAR 1965/66

3. PSYCHIATRICRMIDENCY CENTERS



109. New York Medical College

Metropolitan Hospital

Center

New York, New York (L)

110. New York University Medical

X

Center and Bellevue Hospital

Center


111. Pilgrim State Hospital

X

West Brentwood, New York

(S)

112. St. Lawrence State Hospital

Ogdensburg, New York

(S)

113. St. Vincent's Hospital

and

Medical Center of New York


114. State University of New York

Upstate Medical Center

Syracuse, New York

(1.)

115. Strong Memorial Hospital

of the

X

University of Rochester

Rochester, New York

(L)

116. Rochester State Hospital

Rochester, New York

(S)

117. Roosevelt Hospital

New York, New York (S)


Hospital (Bronx)

New York City, New York (3)

TY

PE O

F C

RIM

INA

L J

UST

ICE

SPE

CIA

LIZ

AT

ION

OTHER

MENTIONED

SPECIALIZATION

FORENSIC

PENAL

PSYCHIATRY

PSYCHIATRY

X

X

X

EXPERIENCE 'dITH

OFFENDER CASES

FOR THE ACADEMIC

YEAR 1965/66

X X

3. PSYCHIATRIC

RESIDENCY CENTERS



119. U.S. Veterans

Administration

Hospital (Manhattan)

New Yoec, New York (L)

120. Utica State Hospital

Utica, New York

(S)

121. Duke University Affiliated

Hospitals

Durham, North Carolina

(L)

122. Dorothea Dix Hospital

Raleigh, North

Carolina (L)

Ir.

123. John Umstead Hospital

Butner, North Carolina

(S)

124. North Carolina Baptist Hospitals

Winston-Salem, North Carolina

(S)

125. University ofCincinnati

Hospital Groun

Cincinnati, Ohio (L)

126. Cleveland Psychiatric Institute

Cleveland, Ohio (S)

127. Columbus State Hosital

Columbus, Ohio (S)

128. Rollman Psychiatric Institute

Cincinnati, Ohio (S)

129. University Hospitalsof

Cleveland

Cleveland, Ohio (S)


EXPERIENCE WITH

OTHER

OFFENDER CASES

FORENSIC

PENAL

MENTIONED

FOR THE ACADEMIC

PSYCHIATRY

PSYCHIATRY

SPECIALIZATION

YEAR 1965/66

X X

3. PSYCHIATRIC

RLSIDENCY CENTERS



130. Central State

Griffin Memorial

Hospital

Norman, Oklahoma

(S)

131. Oregon State Hospital

Salem, Oregon

(S)

132. University of Oregon

Medical

School Hospitals and Clinics

Portland, Oregon

(S)

133. Allentown State Hospital

Allentown, Pennsylvania

(S)

134. Danville State Hospital

Danville, Pennsylvania

(S)

135. Hahnemann Medical Collegeand

Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

(S)

136. Harrisburg State Hospital

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

(S)

137. Health Center Hospitalsof the

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

(L)

138. Hospital of the University of

Pennsylvania


(S)

139. Jefferson Medical College


(S)

140. Mayview State Hospital

Mayview, Pennsylvania

(S)


OTHER

FORENSIC

PENAL

MENTIONED

PSYCHIATRY

PSYCHIATRY

SPECIALIZATION

EXPERIENCE WITH

OFFENDER CASES

FOR THE ACADEMIC

YEAR 1965/66




141. Norristown State Hospital

Norristown, Pennsylvania (S)

142. Philadelphia Psychiatric Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (L)

143. Philadelphia State Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (S)

144. Temple University Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (L)

145. U.S. Naval Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (S)


Hospital

Coatesville, Pennsylvania (S)

147. Warren State Hospital

Warren, Pennsylvania (L)

148. Emma Pendleton Bradley Hospital

Riverside, Rhode Island (S)

149. State of Rhode Is3and Medical

Center-Institute of Mental Health

Howard, Rhode Island

(Size unknown)

150. Medical Center Hospitals

Charleston, South Carolina (S)

351. Tennessee Psychiatric Hospital

and Research Institute

Memphis, Tennessee (S)


EXPERIENCE WITH

OTHER

OFFENDER CASES

FORENSIC

PENAL

MENTIONED

FOR THE ACADEMIC

PSYCHIATRY

PSYCHIATRY

SPECIALIZATION

YEAR 1965/66

X



PSYCHIATRIC RESIDENCY CENZEii

TYPE oF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SPECIALIZATION

EXPERIENCE WITH

OTHER

OFFENDER CASES

FORENSIC.

PENAL

MENTIONED

FOR

TH

N A

CA

DE

MIC

PSYCHIATRY

PSYCHIATRY

SPECIALIZATION

YEAR 1965/66

152. Vanderbilt University Hospital

XNashville, Tennessee (S)

153. Alistin State Hospital

XAustin, Texas (S)

154. Baylor University Affiliated

X

Hospitals

Houston, Texas (S)

155. Southwestern Med3eal School

XDallas. Texas (L)

156. University of Texas Medical

XBranch Hospitals

Galveston, Texas (L)

157. U.S. A4r Force hospital

San Antonio, Texas (S)

)98. University of Utah Affiliated

XHospitals

Salt Lalze City, Utah (L)

159. University of Vermont Affiliated

Hos-oltals

Burlington, Vermont

(Size unknown)

160. Central State Hospital

XX

Petersburg, Virginia (S)

:161. University of Virginia Hospital

Charlottesville, Virginia (S)

167. Northern State Hos?ital

ledro Woolley, Washinffton (S)


TY

PE O

F C

RIM

INA

L J

USM

CE

SPE

CIA

LIZ

AT

ION

effiw

ao.

/0.

*VD

mar

CO

Ma.

Win AND LOCATION OF


163. University of Washington

Affiliated Hosnitals

Seattle, Washington (L)

164. Western State Hospital

Tacoms, Washington (S)

165. Milwaukee County Mental Health

Center North Division

Milwaukee, Wisconsin (5)

16(J. University of Wisconsin Affiliated

Hosf,itals

1Mrldison, Wisconsin (L)

1

aela

.M.la

EXPERIENCE WITH

OTHER

OFFENDER CASES

FORMSIC

PENAL

MENTIONED

FOR THE ACADEMIC

PSYCHIATRY

PSYCHIATRY

SPECIALIZATION

YEAR 19W66

XX X

SCHOOLS OF LAW(l965/66)V

Introduction

This section lists law schools which report that they offer one

or more of the following specialized courses in addition to Criminal

Law:2(

(1) Classroom courses in Correctional Law - defined as courses

in the content, theory, method amd procedure of Correctional

Law from case disposition through completion of sentence

(2) Special sequence in Criminal or Correctional Law - "Hine or

more credit hours in a defined program of study"

(3) Field placementai in Criminal Justice settings - defined as

student experience in Criminal or Correctional Law in the

following types of organizations:

(a) Legal Aid Bureau and other community agencies providing

legal service to the indigent

(b) Bar Association aad other professional committees providing

legal service to the indigent

(e) 011ice of the Prosecuting Attorney or PUblic Defender

(d) Correctional agencies and institutions

(e) Other placements for experience in Criminal or Correctional

Law

The 59 schools of law which offer one or more of the courses listed

above are listed alphabetically by state.

2, See Appendix B for a summary of study method and a description ofschools of law and other graduate professional sdhools surveyedby the project.This course is required for the LL.B. (J.D.) degree. Classroomcourses in Criminal Lar were defined as courses in the content,theory, method and procedure of Criminal Law from police actionthrough conviction.

r

-50-

4

4. SCHOOLS OF LAW

NAME AND LOCATIONOF SCHOOL 1/

1. Samford UniversityCumberland School of LawBirmingham, Alabama (S)

2. University of CaliforniaSchool of LawBerkeley, California (L)

3. University of CaliforniaSchool of LawLos Angeles, California (L)

4. University of San DiegoSchool of LawSan Diego, California (S)

5. University of San FranciscoSchool of LawSan Francisco, California (L)

6. University of SouthernCaliforniaSchool of LawLos Angeles, California (L)

7. University of ColoradoSchool of LawBoulder, Colorado (L)

8. University of DenverCollege of LawDenver, Colorado (L)

9. University of ConnecticutSchool of LawHartford, Connecticut (S)

10. Yale UniversitySchool of LawNew Haven, Connecticut (L)

11. American UniversityWashington College of LawWashington, D.C. (L)


CLASSROOMCOURSES INCORRECTIONALLAW

X

X

X

X

X

X

SPECIALSEqUENCE INCRIMINAL ORCORRECTIONAL LAW

FIELDPLACEMENTS INCRIMINAL JUSTICESETTINGS

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

y The size of each school is designated by an (S) for small and (L) for large. Small

schools are defined as those which awarded 70 or less LL.B.(J.D.) degrees and

large as more than 70 LL.B.(J.D.) degrees during the academic year 1965/66.

-51-

L. SCHOOLS OF LAW


12. George Washirqton UniversityLaw SchoolWashington, D.C. (L)

13. Georgetown UniversityLaw CenterWashington, D.C. (L)

14. Hoiard UniversitySchool of LawWashington, D.C. (S)

15. Florida Agricultural andMechanical UniversityCollege of LawTallahassee, Florida (S)

16. University of MiamiSchool of LawCoral Gables, Florida (L)

17. Emory UniversityEtory School of LawAtlanta, Georgia (L)

18. University of GeorgiaSchool of LawAthens, Georgia (S)

19. De Paul UniversityCollege of LawChicago, Illinois(Size unknown)

20. University of IllinoisSchool of LawUrbana, Illinois (L)

21. Northwestern UniversitySchool of LawChicago, Illinois (L)

22. University of Notre DameSchool of LawSouth Bend, Indiana (S)



X

X

X

X

* School reports a sequence of 8 credit hours.

SPECIALSWIENCE INCRIMINAL ORCORRECTIONAL LAW

X

X


X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

4. SCHOOLS OF LAW


23. Drake UniversityLaw SchoolDes Moines, Iowa(Size unknown)

24. University of KansasSchool of LawLawrence, Kansas (L)

25. Washburn University of Topeka

School of LawTopeka, Kansas (S)

26. University of MarylandSchool of LawBaltimore, Maryland (L)

27. Boston CollegeLaw SchoolBrighton, Massachusetts (L)

28. Harvard UniversityLaw SchoolCambridge, Massachusetts (L)

29. University of Minnesota

Law SchoolMinneapolis, Minnesota (L)

30. University of Missouri at

Kansas CitySchool of LawKansas City, Missouri (S)

31. Saint Louis UniversitySchool of LawSt. Louis, Missouri (S)

32. Mbntana State UniversitySchool of LawMissoula, Montana (5)

33. Columbia UniversitySchool of LawNew York, New York (L)

34. State University of New York

at BuffaloSchool of LawBuffalo, New York (5)

CLASS AliD FIELD COURSES


X

X

X

X

-53-

SPECIALSEQUENCE INCRIMINAL ORCORRECTIONAL LAW

X


X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

4. SCHOOLS OF LAW


35. New York UniversitySchool of LawNew York, New York (L)

36. St. John's UniversitySchool of LawNew York, New York (L)

37. Syracuse UniversityCollege of LawSyracuse, New York (L)

38. Duke UniversitySchool of LawDurham, North Carolina (L)

39. University of North CarolinaSchool of LawChapel Hill,North Carolina (L)

40. Baldwin-Wallace CollegeCleveland Marshall Law SchoolCleveland, Ohio (L)

41. Capital UniversitySchool of LawColumbus, Ohio (S)

42. University of CincinnatiCollege of LawCincinnati, Ohio (S)

43. Ohio State UniversityCollege of LawColumbus, Ohio (L)

44. Oklahoma City UniversitySchool of LawOklahoma City, Oklahoma (S)

45. University of OklahomaCollege of LawNorman, Oklahoma (L)

46. University of TulsaSchool of LawTulsa, Oklahoma(Size unknown)

47. University of PittsburghSchool of LawPittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S)



X

X

X

SPECIALSEQUENCE INCRIMINAL ORCORRECTIONAL LAW

X

X

Fla])PLACEMENTS INCRIMINAL JUSTICESETTINGS

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

4. SCHOOLS OF LAW

NAME AND LOCATIONOF SCHOOk

48. University of South CarolinaSchool of LawColumbia, South Carolina (L)

49. State University of South Dakota

School of LawVermillion, South Dakota (S)

50. University of TennesseeCollege of LawKnoxville, Tennessee (L)

51. Vanderbilt UniversitySchool of LawNashville, Tennessee (L)

52. University of HoustonCollege of LawHouston, Texas (L)

53. Southern Methodist University

School of LawDallas, Texas (L)

54. University of TexasSchool of LawAustin, Texas(Size unknown)

55. University of UtahCollege of LawSalt Lake City, Utah (S)

56. College of William and Mary

The Marshall-Wythe School of Law

Williamsburg, Virginia (S)

57. Marquette UniversityLaw SchoolMilwaukee, Wisconsin (S)

58. University of WisconsinLaw SchoolMadison, Wisconsin (L)

59. University of WyomingCollege of LawLaramie, Wyoming (S)



X

X

X

X

X

* School reports a sequence of 7 credit hours.

-55-

290-841 0-68-5

SPECIALSEqUENCE INCRIMINAL ORCORRECTIONAL LAWes

X

X


X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

PART II

UNIVERSITY CRIME AND DELINQUENCY CENTERS OFFERING TRAINING

FOR THE FIELD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE

UNIVERSITY CRIME AND DELINQUENCY CENTIRS(1965/66 AND 1966/67) .11

Introduction

This section lists University Crime and Delinquency Centers which

report that they offer training programs in Criminal Justice for aca-

demic or practitioner groups. The five criteria for a Center are:

(1) That it exist as a distinct organizational unit

(2) That it be responsible to either central administration an4/or

a school or department of a university or college

(3) That it employ at least one full-time professional staff member

(4) That new employees be selected by center staff and administration

rather than by outside organisations

(5) That it offer training courses, institutes, or workshops for

at least one of the following groups during the academic years

1965/66 or 1966/67:3(

Law enforcement personnel (i.e., administrators, police officers -

adult division, and police officers - juvenile division)

Court ummael (i.e., judges in criminal, juvenile, or family

courtst prosecuting attonieys, and public defender attorneys)

erobationasonnel (i.e., administrators, parole

board members, probation/parole officers - adult division, and

probation/parole officers - juvenile division)

Correctional institution personnel (i.e., administrators, cottage

parents, correctional officers, classification and assignment

personnel, diagnostic and treatment personnel, and general

counseling personnel)

Faculty of the college or univemitt

See Appendix C for a summary of study method and a description ofthe centers surveyed by the project.This criterion excludes organizations engaged in research, consultation,or related activities but not directly engaged in training personnel

for Criminal Justice.

Matriculated students enrolled in courses offered for

,degree credit,

A Continuing Center is defined as one Whose training programs in

Criminal Justice are assured until at least 1970.

Crime and Delinquency Centers (N=27) are listed alphabetically by

state. Twenty-three Centers offered training programs in both 1965/66

and 1966/67. One Center terminated at the end of the 1965/66 academic

year and three others began training operations in 1966/67.

-59-

NAME AND LOCATION

OF CENTER

PART II

UNIVERSITY CRIME ANDDELINQUENCY CENTERS

TYPE OF PERSONNEL TRAINEDFOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE

LAW

PROBATION

CORRECTIONAL

ENFORCEMENT COURT

AND PAROLE INSTITUTION

MATRICULATED CONTINUINC

PERSONNEL

PERSONNEL PERSONNEL

PERSONNEL

FACULTY STUDENTS

CENTER

1. Institute for PoliceStudies

California State College

Long Beach, California

XX

X

2. Northern California Peace

Officers School

Diablo Valley College

Pleasant Hill, California

XX

X

3. Rio Hondo Peace

Officers

Academy

Rio Hondo Junior College

Santa Fe Springs, Calif.

XX

XX

4. MDTA Law Enforcement Center

Law Enforcement Department

Trinidad State Junior College

Trinidad, California

XX

XX

X

5. Youth Studies Center

University of Southern California

Los Angeles, California

X

6. Institute of Correctional

Administration

School of Government and

PUblic Affairs

American University

Washington, D.C.

XX

X

NAME AND LOCATION

OF CENTER

FART II

UNIVERSITY CRIME AND DELINQUENCY CENTERS

TYPE OF PERSONNEL TRAINED FOR CRIMINALJUSTICE

LAW

PROBATION

CORRECTIONAL

ENFORCEMENT COURT


MATRICULATED CONTINUING

PERSONNEL

PERSONNEL PERSONNEL

PLRSONNEL

FACULTY

STUDENTS

CENTER

7. Center for Youth and

Community Studies

Howard University

Washington, D.C.

XX

XX

8. Georgia Institute of Law

and Government

Law School

University of Georgia

Athens, Georgia

XX

XX

9. Center for the Studyof Crime,

Delinquency and Corrections

Southern Illinois University

Carbondale, Illinois

XX

XX

10. The Center for Studies in

Criminal Justice

University of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois

XX

XX

11. Governmental Research Center

University of Kansas

Lawrence, Kansas

XX

XX

12. Southern Police Institute

University of Louisville

Louisville, Kentucky

XX

*Programs initiated for these personnelin the academic year 1966/67 are identified by an

asterisk.

NAM AND LOCATION

OF CENTER

PART II



LAW

PROBATION

CORRECTIONAL

ENFORCEMENT COURT


MATRICULATED

CONTINUING

PERSONNEL

PERSONNEL PERSONNEL

PERSONNEL

FACULTY

STUDENTS

CENTER

13. Training Center in

Youth

Development

Law-Medicine Research Institute

Boston University


XX

14. The National Center on Police

and Community Relations

Michigan State University

East Lansing, Michigan

XX

15. University Committee on Training

for the Control of

Delinquency and Crime

Law School

University of Minnesota


X

16. Institute for Delinquency Control

School of Social Service

St. Louis University

St. Louis, Missouri

X

17. Youth Development CenterV

Syracuse University

Syracuse, New York

18. Training Center on Delinquency

and Youth Crime

Institute of Government

University of North Carolina

Chapel Hill, North Carolina

X

X

X X

Center initiated training programa

in 1966/67 although in operationprior to that tine.

NAME AND LOCATION

OF CENTER

PART II

UNIVERSITY CRIMEAND DELINQUENCYCENTERS

TYPE OF PERSONNELTRAINED FOR CRIMINALJUSTICE

LAW

PROBATION

CORRECTIONAL

ENFORCEMENT COURT



PERSONNEL

PERSONNEL PERSONNEL

PERSONNEL

FACULTY STUDENTS

CENTER

19. Institute onCorrections -

Delinquency ProjectI(

University of Toledo

Toledo, Ohio

20. Youth Development

Training

Centerbi

School of AppliedSocial Science

Western ReserveUniversity

Cleveland, Ohio

21. Law - MedicineCenter

'School of Law

A^

Western ReserveUniversity

irCleveland, Ohio

X

22. Southwest Center

for Law

Enforcement

University of Oklahoma -

North Campus

Norman, Oklahoma

X

23. Center forPolice & Corrections

The PennsylvaniaState University

University Park,

Pennsylvania

24. Institute ofContemporary Corrections

and the BehavioralSciences

Sam Houston StateCollege

Huntsville, Texas

X

Center began operations

in 1961/67.

sy Center terminated at

end of 1965/66

academic year.

X X

NAME AND LOCATION

OF CENTER

PART II



LAW

PROBATION

CORRECTIONAL

ENFORCEMENT COURT



PERSONNEL

PERSONNEL

PERSONNEL

PERSONNEL

FACULTY STUDENTS

CENTER

25. Center for Law and the

Behavioral Sciences

Law School

University of Texas

Austin, Texas

X

26. Training Center for the Prevention

and Control of Juvenile

Delinquency

University of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah

X

27. Law Enforcement Career

Development Center

Bureau of Government

Extension Division

University of Wisconsin

Madison, Wisconsin

XX

C.,SIV"iir711ZWM.

PART III

CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCIES CONDUCTING

MAJOR IN-SERVICE TRAINING PROGRAMS

-65-

PROBATION/PAROLE SYSTEM(1965) 2./

Introduction

This section contains a list of probation and parole systems which

report major Inpaervice Training programs.

A probation/Parole system is defined as follows: All departments,

divisions, and branch offices of a public organization whose functions

include probation or parole work or administration, and whose personnel

were recruited to and operate under the direction of the sane top

executive.

In4ervice Training is defined as training programs which consist

of a scheduled series of teadhing sessions that are organized and con-

ducted under the sole auspice of the responding probation/Parole system.

In-Service teaching sessions sky be limited to particular personnel of

the system or may be open to employees of other correctional systema

A major In-Service Training program is determined by two criteria:

(1) that the probation/Parole system employ at least one staff member

responsible for training on a full-time basis or that its training

programs be formally organized through a Central Training Unit (Training

Center, Training Department); (2) that the probation/parole system employ

a staff of at least ten full-time prObation/parole officers.

Probation/parole systems conducting major In-Service Training programs

(N=43) are classified by level of government. Each system is designated

See Appendix D for a summary of study method and description of theprobation and parole systems surveyed by the'project.Inp-Service Training is distinguished from (1) General Trainini(e.g.,supervisory conferences, special lectures or seminars, and short-terminstitutes or workshops), (2) Outside Training (i.e., training programsconducted by other organizations in Which the probation/Parole systemparticipates either as a co-sponsor or by providing arrangements forattendance of its staff saibers).

-66-

fa,

1.1,.r,

by whether it offers training programs to the following practitioner

groups:

Ttainees - defined as employees who will become professional staff

members only upon completion of their on-the-job training apprenticeship

New prt,tctitioners - defined as personnel who have been members of

professional staff for six months or less

Ekperienced practitioners - defined as personnel who have been

members of professional staff for more than six months

In addition, each system is identified according to whether it

serves adult offenders, juveniles, or both.

-67-

FEDERAL

NAME AND LOCATION

OF AGENCY

PART III - SECTION A

PROBATION - PAROLE AGENCIES

PRACTITIONER GROUPS FOR WHOM IN-SERVICE

TRAINING PROGRAMS WERE CONDUCTED (1965)

NEW

arsaTENCED

SUPERVISORS

CENTRAL

FULL-TIME

AGE GROUP

OR

TRAINING

DIRECTOR OF

OF AGENCY

TDAINEES PRACTITIONERS PRACTITIONERS

ADMINISTRATORS

UNIT

TRAINING

CASELOAD 2/

1. Southern District Court

U.S. Probation Office

1./

Los Angeles, Calif.

XX

XX

A & J

2. Northern District Court

U.S. Probation Office ii

Chicago, Illinois

XX

XX

XA & J

1/All federal probation offices also provide parole

services.

2/ A = Adults;

J = Juveniles;

A & J = Adults and Juveniles.

STATE

NAME AND LOCATION

OF AGENCY

1. Board of Directors of

State Institutions for

Juveniles





SUPERVISORS

CENTRAL

FULL-TIME

AGE GROUP

NEW

EXPERIENCED

OR

TRAINING

DIRECTOR OF OF AGENCY

TRAINEES

PRACTITIONERS

PRACTITIONERS ADMINISTRATORS

UNIT

TRAINING

CASELOAD

Phoenix, Arizona

XX

2. Division of Delinquency

Prevention

Youth Authority

Sacramento, Calif.

XX

XX

XX

J

13. Parole and Community

cn

Services Division

Sacramento, Calif.

XX

XX

XX

A

4. Division of Administration

Department of Parole

Denver, Colorado

XX

XX

XA

5. Division of Institutions

Dept. of Public Welfare

Atlanta, Georgia

XX

XX

XJ

6. Board of Paroles & Pardons

Dept. of Social Services

Honolulu, Hawaii

XX

XA

7. Juvenile Parole Branch

Corrections Division

Dept. of Social Services

Honolulu, Hawaii

XX

J

X

STATE

NAME AND LOCATION

OF AGENCY

8.

Division of Parole

Dept. of Correction

Indianapolis, Indiana

9.

Division of Probation

and Parole

Dept. of Corrections

PART III - SECTICW A



TRAINING PROGRAMS WERE =DUCTED (1965)

SUPERVISORS

CENTRAL

FULL-TIME

AGE GROUP

NEW

EXPERIENCED

OR

TRAINING DIRECTOR OF OF AGENCY

TRAINEES

PRACTITICNERS

PRACTITIONRRS ADMINISTRATORS

UNIT

TRAINING

CASELOAD

XX

XA & J

Frankfurt, Kentucky

XX

XX

XA

10. Youth Conservation

Commission


St. Paul, Minnesota

X

11. Division of Parole

Board of Parole

Albany, New York

XX

XX

XX

12. Children's Services

Dept. of Social Welfare

Albany, New York

XX

XX

X

13. Adult Parole Authority

Division of Correction

Columbus, Ohio

XX

XX

X

14. Board of Probation

and Parole

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

XX

XX

X

15. Division of Probation

and Paroles

Dept. of Correction

Nashville, Tennessee

XX

XX

XX

XX

XA &

X

A Li A A Li

STATE

NAME AND LOCATION

OF AGENCY





SUPERVISORS

CENTRAL

FULL-TIME

AGE GROUP

NEW

EXPERIENCED

OR


TRAINEES

PRACTITIONERS

PRACTITIONERS ADMINISTRATORS UNIT

TRAINING

CASELOAD

16. Second District Juvenile

Court

State Juvenile Court

Salt Lake City, Utah

XX

X

17. Bureau of Juvenile

Probation & Detention

Dept. of Welfare

and Inst,tutions

Richmond, Virginia

XX

XX

XA & J

18. Virginia Probation and

Parole Board

Dept. of Welfare

and Institutions

Richmond, Virginia

XX

XA

19. Dept. of Welfare

Division of Child Welfare

Charleston, West Virginia

XX

XX

X

20. Division of Corrections

Dept. of PUblic Welfare

Madison, Wisconsin

XX

XX

XA & J

COUNTY & MUNICIPAL

NAME AND LOCATION

OF AGENCY

PART II - SECTION A




SUPERVISORS

CENTRAL

FULD-TIME

AGE GROUP

NEW

EXPERIENCED

OR

TRAINING


TRAINEES

PRACTITIONERS

PRACTITIONERS ADMINISTRATORS

UNIT

TRAINING

CASELOAD

1.

Alameda County

Probation Department

Oakland, Calif.

XX

XX

XA & J

2.

San Diego County


San Diego, Calif.

XX

XX

XA & J

3.

Orange County


Orange, Calif.

XX

XA & J

4.

Santa Barbara County



XX

A & J

5.

Santa Clara County

Juvenile Probation Dept.


XX

X

6.

Dade County Juvenile &

Domestic Relations Court

Miami, Florida

XX

XX

X

7.

Washtenaw County


Ann Arbor, Michigan

XX

A

8.

Juvenile Division

Macomb County Probate Court

Mt. Clemens, Michigan

XX

X

COUNTY & MUNICIPAL

NAME AND LOCATION

OF AGENCY





SUPERVISORS

CENTRAL

FULL-TIME

AGE GROUP

NEW

EXPERIENCED

OR

TRAINING


TRAINEES

PRACTITIONERS PRACTITIONERS ADMINISTRATORS UNIT

TRAINING

CASELOAD

9.

Juvenile Division

Oakland County

Probate Court

Pontiac, Michigan

XX

XX

A &J

10. Circuit Courts

St. Louis Probation

and Parole Department

St. Louis, Missouri

XX

A

11. Essex County


Newark, New Jersey

XX

XA & J

12. Kings County

Second Judicial Dept.

Probation Office

Brooklyn, New York

XX

XA

13. Niagara County


Lockport, New York

XX

XA & J

14. Nassau County


Mineola, New York

XX

XX

XA & J

15. New York City

Office of Ptobation

New York, New York

XX

XX

XA & J

COUNTY & MUNICIPAL

NAME AND LOCATION

OF AGENCY





SUPERVISORS

CENTRAL

FUIL-TIME

AGE GROUP

NEW

EXPERIENCED

OR


TRAINEES

PRACTITIONERS

PRACTITIONERS ADMINISTRATORS UNIT

TRAINING

CASELOAD

16. Onondaga County


Syracuse, New York

X

17. Lucas County


XX

XA & J

Toledo, Ohio

XX

X

18. TUlsa County

Juvenile Court

Tulsa, Oklahoma

XX

19. Multnomah County


Portland, Oregon

XX

XX

20. Davidson County

Juvenile Court

Nashville, Tennessee

XX

21. Dallas County Juvenile

Probation Office

Dallas, Texas

XX

X

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION SYSTEMS

(1965) yIntroduction

This section lists correctional institution systems reporting

major In-Service Training programs.

A correctional institution system is defined as follows: All prisons,

reformatories, jails, workhouses, training schools, camps, halfway

houses, diagnostic centers, &Mother correctional facilities and their

personnel which operate as a separate administrative unit under the

direction of the same top executiveea(

In-Service Training is defined as training programs which consist

of a scheduled series of teaching sessions that are orgenized and conducted

under the sole auspice of the responding institutional system. Inraervice

teaching sessions may be limited to particular personnel of the system

or may be open to employees of other correctional systems)/

A major InrService Training program is determined by two criteria:

(1) that the correctional institution system employ at least one staff member


programs be formally orginized through a Central Training Unit (Training

Center, Training Department); (2) that the correctional institution

system be located on the state or federal level, be a training school

for juveniles on the county or municipal level, or be a private institution

caring for juvenile offenders.i(

y See Appendix E for a summary of study methods and description of the

correctional institution systems surveyed by the project.When juvenile and adult facilities and personnel are divided into

separate administrative units, eadh with its own top executive, they

are treated as two systems.y In-Service Training is distinguidhed from (1) General Training (e.g.,

supervisory conferences, special lectures or seminars, and short-terninstitutes or workshops), (2) Outside Training (i.e., training programsconducted by other organizations in which fie correctional systemparticipates either as a co-sponsor or by providing arrangements forattendance of its staff members).

!V The correctional institution systems excluded, by these criteria arecity and county jails and workhouses and juvenile detention homes.

-75-

Correctional institution systems conducting major InmService

Trainimg programs (N=42) are classified into state systems, county and

municipal systems, and private institutions for juveniles. Rich system

is designatod by the practitioner groups for whom training is offered

and the age group of its inmate population.

-76-

STATE

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SYSTEM

PART III - SECTION B

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION SYSTENS


TRAINING PROGRAMS WERE CONDUCTED

(1965)

CLASSIFICATION

AND GENERAL

DIAGNOSTIC & CENTRAL

FULL-TIME

AGE GROUP

COTTAGE

CUSTODY

COUNSELING

TREATMENT

TRAINING

DIRECTOR OF

OF INMATE

PARENTS

STAFF

STAFF

STAFF

UNIT

TRAINING

FOPULAT1ONY

1. Dept. of Corrections

Sacramento, Calif.

XX

XX

XA


State Dept. of Institutions

Denver, Colorado

XX

XX

A

3. Division of YouthServices

State Department

of Institutions

Fort Logan, Colorado

XX

XX

XJ

4. Connecticut Reformatory

Cheshire, Conn.

XX

A

5. Long Lane School

Middletown, Conn.

XX

XJ

6. Connecticut State Prison

Somers, Conn.

XX

XX

A

7. Corrections Division

Dept. of SocialServices

Honolulu, Hawaii

XX

XX

A & J


Board of Control

of State Institutions

Des Moines, Iowa

XX

A & J

A = Adults; J = Juvenilss; A & J =

Adults and Juvenilss.

STATE

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SYSTEM





CLASSIFICATION

AND GENERAL


FULL-TIME

AGE GROUP

COTTAGE

CUSTODY COUNSELING

TREATMENT

TRAINING

DIRECTOR OF

OF mum

PARENTS

STAFF

STAFF

STAFF

UNIT

TRAINING

POPULATION

9.

Division of Institutions


Frankfort, Kentucky

X

10. Division of

Institutional Services

Kentucky Dept. of

Child Welfare

Frankfort, Kentucky

XX

11. Maryland State

Dept. of Correction

Baltimore, Maryland

XX

12. Department of Correction

Boston, Mass.

XX

13. Michigan Dept. of

Corrections

Lansing, Michigan

XX

XX

XA

14. State Dept. of

Social Services

Lansing, Michigan

XX

15. Division of Adult

Correction

Minnesota Dept. of

Corrections

St. Paul, Minn.

XX

XX

XA

X X

A A A

X

,e

STATE

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SYSTEM





CLASSIFICATION

AND GENERAL


FULL-TIME

AGE GROUP

COTTAGE

CUSTODY COUNSELING

TREATMENT

TRAINING

DIRECTOR OF

OF INNATE

PARENTS

STAFF

STAFF

STAFF

UNIT

TRAINIhn

POPULAITON

16. Division of Youth

Conservation

Minnesota Dept. of

Corrections

St. Paul, Minn.

XX


Jefferson City, Mo.

XX

XX

XA

18. State Dept. of

Public Institutions

Helena, Montana

X

19. Division of

Correction & Parole

State Dept. of

Institutions & Agencies

Trenton, New Jersey

XX

XA & J

20. Penitentiary of

New Mexico

Santa Fe, N.M.

XX

XX

A

XX

X

XX

A & J

21. New York State

Training Schools

Office of

State Institutions

State Dept. of Welfare

Albany, New York

XX

XX

STATE

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SYSTEM


CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONSYSTEMS

PRACTITIONER GROUPS FORWHOM IN-SERVICE

TRAINING PROGRAMS WERECONDUCTED (1965)

CLASSIFICATION

AND GENERAL


FULL-TIME

AGE GROUP

COTTAGE

CUSTODY COUNSELING

TREATMENT

TRAINING

DIRECTOR OF

OF DIME

PARENTS

STAFF

STAFF

STAFF

UNIT

TRAINING

POPULITION

22. North Carolina

Prison Department

Raleigh, NorthCarolina

23. North

Carolina Board

of Juvenile Correction

Raleigh, North

Carolina

X

24. Division of Treatment

Services

Department ofMental

Hygiene &Correction

Columbus, Ohio

25. OhjoYouthCommission

Columbus, Ohio

X

26. Board of Control

Corrections Division

Salem, Oregon

X

27. Dept. ofPublic Welfare

Bureau of Youth Services

Harrisburg,Pennsylvania

X


Columbia, SouthCarolina

29. South Dakota

State Penitentiary

Sioux Falls, So.Dakota

XX

XA

XX

XX

XA

XX

XX

XA

XX

XX

A & J

XX

X

XX

XX

XA

XX

A

STATE

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SYSTEM





CLASSIFICATION

AND GENERAL

DIAGNOSTIC & CFATRAL

FULL-TIME

AGE GROUP

COTTAGE

CUSTODY

COUNSELING

TREATMENT

TRAINING

DIRECTOR OF

OF Imre

PARENTS

STAFF

STAFF

STAFF

UNIT

TRAINING

POPULATION

30. Utah State Prison

Draper, Utah



and Institutions

Richmond, Virginia

32. Division of Adult

Correction

OD

Olympia, Washington

ha



Madison, Wisconsin

X

X X X X

X X

XA

XA

XA

XX

XA & J

COUNTY & MUNICIPAL

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SYSTEM

1. Juvenile Facilities

Division

Los Angeles County

Probation Dept.

Los Angeles, Calif.





CLASSIFICATION

AND GENERAL


FULL-TIME

AGE GROUP

COTTAGE

CUSTODY COUNSELING

TREATMENT

TRAINING

DIRECTOR OF

OF INN=

PARENTS

STAFF

STAFF

STAFF

UNIT

TRAINING

POPMATION

XX

2. Santa Clara County

Juvenile Probation

Department

So

San Jose, Calif.

XX

XJ

IN4

1

SD y

5. Berkshire Farm for Boys

Canaan, New York

X

6. The Children's Village Inc.

Dobbs Ferry, New York

X

7. House of the Good Shepherd


X

PRIVATE

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SYSTEM





CLASSIFICATION

AND GEMAL


FULL-TIME

AGE GROUP

COTTAGE

CUSTODY COUNSELING

TREATMENT

TRAINING

DIRECTOR OF

OF INMATE

PARENTS

STAFF

STAFF

STAFF

UNIT

TRAINING

POPULkTION

1. Rancho San Antonio

Chatsworth, Calif.

X

2. Maryhurst School


X

3. Villa Maria School

Grand Rapids, Michigan

4. Good Shepherd Home

St. Paul, Minnesota

XX X

X

X .x X X

LAW ENFORCEMENT SYSTEMS(1969

Introduction

This section contains a list of law enforcement systems Which report

major In-Service Training programs.

A law enforcement system is defined as follows: All departments,

divisions and branch offices of a public organization wb3se functions

include law enforcement, and whose personnel were recruited to and

operate under the direction of the same top executive.

In-Service Training is defined as training programs Which consist

of a scheduled series of teadhing sessions that are organized and con-

ducted under the sole auspice of the responding law enforcement system.

In-Service teaching sessions may be limited to particular personnel of

the system or may be open to employees of other law enforcement systems.31(

A major InService Training program is determined by tvo criteria:

(1) that the law enforcement system employ at least one staff member


programs be formally organized through a Central Training Unit (Training

Center, Training Department); (2) that the law enforcement nystem be

located on the state or federal level or in a large county (with the

county seat having a population of at least 250,000), or in a large

municipality (cities with a population of at least 100,000).

le See Appendix F for a summary of study method and description of thelaw enforcement systems surveyed by the project.

V In-Service Training is distingnidhed from (1) General Trainin (e.g.,

supervisory conference) special lectures or se nars, and short-terminstitutes or workshops 9 (2) Outside Training (i.e., trainingprograms conducted by other organizations in which the law enforce-

ment system participates either as a co-sponsor or by providingarrangements for attendance of its staff melbers).

-81+-

Law enforcement systems conducting major In-Service Training programs

(N=103) are classified by level of government. Each system is designated

by Whether it offers training programs to the followLng practitioner

groups:

Recruits - defined as new employees being trained for certification

as law enforcement officers

Juvenile offiderii - defined as police officers Whose major assignps

sent is to the juvenile or youth division (bureau or detail)

Other officers - defined as police officers Whose major assignment

is to a unit other than the juvenile division

FEDERAL

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SYSTEM

1. Internal Revenue

Service

U.S. Department of the Treasury

WashinGton, D.C.

PART III - SECTION C

LAW ENFORCEMENT SYSTEMS

PRACTITIONER GROUPS FOR WHOM IN-SFIIVICE

TRAINING PROGRAMS WERE CONDUCTED

(196 )

CENTRAL

FULL-TIME

JUVENILE

OTHER

TRAINING

DIRECTOR OF

RECRUITS

OFFICKRS

OFFICERS

UNIT

TRAINING

X

STATE

MILME AND LOCATION

OF SYSTEM

1Alabama De-ot. of Public Safety

Mcntmmery, Alabama

2.

Alaska State Police

Denartment of Public. Safety

Junewl, Alaska

7California Highway Patrol

Sacramento, California

4.

Colorado State Patrol

Denver, Colorado

co

,a 1

5.

Delnware State Police

Dover, Delaware

6.

Department of Public Safety

Atlanta, Georgia

7.

Idaho Stnte Police

Boise, Idaho

8.

Illinois State Highway Police

S-)rinfield, Illinois

9.

Indiana State Police

Indianalsolis, Indiana

10. Kansas Highway Patrol

Toneka, Kansas

11. De7t. of State Police of Michigan

East Lansing, Michigan

1.2. Minnesota Himhway P?.trol

St. Paul, Minnesota


LAW MFORCEMENT SYSTEMS


TRAINING PROGRAMS WERE CONDUCTED.. (1965),

......---

CENTRAL

FULL-TIME

JUVENILE

OTHER

TRAINING

DIRECTOR OF

REC17TTS

OFFICERS

OFFICERS

UNIT

TRAINING

X X X

X

STATE

Mea

vax1

11.1

11

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SYSTEM

PART III -

SECTION C

LAW ENFORCFMFANT

SYSTEMS

PRACTITIONER GROUPSFOR WHOM

IN-SERVICE

TRAINING PROGRAMSWERE CONDUCTED

(1965)

CENTRAL

FULL-TIME

JUVENILE

OTHER

TRAINING

DIRECTOR OF

RECRUITS

OFFICERS

OFFICERS

UNIT

TRAINING

13. NewYork State Police

Albany, NewYork

X

14. North Carolina

State Highway

Patrol

Raleigh,

North Carolina

X

15. NorthDakota HighwayPatrol

Bismark,

North Daknta

X

16. Oregon StRtePolice

Salem, Oregon

X

17. PennsylvaniaState Police

Harrisbixrs, Pennsylvania

152

2hocie Island State

Police

North Scituate,

Rhode Island

X

10

Terme:33er, Highway

Patrol

Nashville,

TennessPe

X

20. 1.'ir6iniaState Police

Ri c

hninnd4, Vircinia

X

21. Vermont Doi)artment

of Pnblic Safety

Mon4'orlior

22.:4?shington

3tate

Oly

mpi

a,Vashington

63. En-rerci,mentDivision and State

Pat-ol

Madison,

Wisconsin

X

COUNTY & MUNICIPAL

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SYSTEM

1.

Birmingham Police Department

Birmingham, Alabama

2.

Mobile Police Department

Mbbile, Alabama

3.

Phoenix Police Department

Phoenix, Arizona

4.

Tucson Police Department

Tucson, Arizona

At 5.

Little Rock Police Department

ir

Little Rock, Arkansas

6.

Berkeley Police Department

Berkeley, California

7.

Fresno City Police Department

Fresno, California

8.

Glendale Police Department

Glendale, California

9.

Alameda County Sheriff's Department

Oakland, California

10. Oakland Police Department

Oakland, California

11. Pasadena Police Department

Pasadena, California

12. San Diego County Sheriff's Department

San Diego, California





CENTRAL

FULL-TIME

JUVENILE

OTHER

TRAINING

DIRECTOR OF

RECRUITS

OFFICERS

OFFICERS

UNIT

TRAINING

X X X X X X X X X

X

COUNTY & MUNICIPAL

PART III - SECTION

C

LAW

RC

IDi

SYSTEMS

PRACTITIONER GROUPS FORWHOM IN-SERVICE

TRAINING PROGRAMS WERECONDUCTED (1965)

CENTRAL

FULL-TIME

NAND AND LOCATION

JUVENILE

OTHER

TRAINING

DIRECTOR OF

OF SYSTEM

RECRUITS

OFFICERS

OFFICERS

UNIT

TRAINING

13. San JosePolice Department

San Jose, California

X

14. Santa Ana Police Department

Santa Ana, California

X

15. TorrancePolice Department

Torrance, California

16. Denver County Police Department

Denver, Colorado

17. Bridgeport

Police Department

Bridgeport,

Connecticut

18. Hartford Police Department

Hartford, Connecticut

19. Dade County

Sheriff's Office

Miami, Florida

20. Miami Police Department

Miami, Florida

21. St. PetersburgPolice Department

St. Petersburg, Florida

22. City of Tampa Police

Department

Tampa, Florida

23. Savannah Police Department

Savannah, Georgia

24. Honolulu Police Department

Honolulu, Hawaii



COUNTY & MUNICIPAL


TRAINING PROGRAMS

N'

CONDUCTED (1965)

CENTRAL

FULL-TIME

NAME AND LOCATION

JUVENILE

OTHER

TRAINING

DIRECTOR OF

OF SYSTEM

RECRUITS

OFFICERS

OFFICERS

UNIT

TRAINING

25. Chicago Police Department

Chicago, Illinois

XX

XX

X

26. Evansville Police Department

EVansville, Indiana

XX

XX

27. Fort Wayne Police Department

Fort Wayne, Indiana

XX

XX

X

28. Hammond Police Department

Hammond, Indiana

XX

XX

29. Indianapolis Police Department

Indianapolis, Indiana

XX

XX

30. South Bend Police Department

South Bend, Indiana

XX

XX

31. Des Moines Police Department

Des Moines, Iowa

XX

XX

32. Topeka Police Department

Topeka, Kansas

XX

XX

33. Wichita Police Department

Wichita, Kansas

XX

XX

34. Louisville Division of Police


XX

XX

35. Springfield Police Department

Springfield, Massachusetts

XX

XX

36. Detroit Police Department

Detroit, Michigan

XX

XX

X



COUNTY & MUNICIPAL



CENTRAL

FULL-TIME

NAME AND LOCATION

JUVENILE

OTHER

TRAINING

DIRECTOR OF

OF SYSTEM

RECRUITS

OFFICERS

OFFICERS

UNIT

TRAINING

37. Flint Police Department

Flint, Michigan

X

38. Lansing Police Department

Lansing, Michigan

X

39. Duluth Police Department

Duluth, Minnesota

X

40. Minneapolis %lice Department


X

46 41. Kansas City Police Department

to

Kansas City, Missouri

X

42. Metropolitan Police Department of the

City of St. Louis

St. Louis, Missouri

X

43. Camden Police Department

Camden, New Jersey

X

44. Elizabeth Police Department

Elizabeth, New Jersey

X

45. Newark Police Department

Newark, New Jersey

X

46. Paterson Police Department

Paterson, New Jersey

X

47. Albuquerque Police Department

Albuquerque, New Mexico

X

48. Albany Department of Police

Albany, New York

X

X X

-

1

41)

vs 53. Winston-SalemPolice Department

Winston-Salem, North Carolina

XX

XX

54. Summit County Sheriff's Office

Akron, Ohio

XX

XX

55. Cincinnati Ohio Division of Police

Cincinnati, Ohio

XX

XX

56. Cleveland Police Department

Cleveland, Ohio

XX

X

57. Columbus Division of Police

Columbus, Ohio

XX

XX

58. Division of Police of Dayton, Ohio

Dayton, Ohio

XX

XX

X

59. City of Toledo Police Department

Toledo, Ohio

XX

X

60. Multnomah County Sheriff's Office

Portland, Oregon

XX

XX

COUNTY & MUNICIPAL

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SYSTEM





CENTRAL

FULL-TIME

JUVENILE

OTHER

TRAINING

DIRECTOR OF

RECRUITS

OFFICERS

OFFICERS

UNIT

TRAINING

49. Buffalo Police Department

Buffalo, New York

XX

X

50. New York City Police Department

New Yorkl.New York

XX

XX

X

51. Niagara Falls Police Department

Niagara Falls, New York

XX

XX

X

52. Syracuse New York POlice Department

Syracuse, New York

XX

XX

COUNTY & MUNICIPAL

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SYSTEM





CENTRAL

FULL-TIME

JUVENILE

OTHER

TRAINING

DIRECTOR OF

RECRUITS

OFFICERS

OFFICERS

UNIT

TRAINING

61. Portland Police Bureau

Portland, Oregon

X

62. Allentown Police Department

Allentown, Pennsylvania

X

63. Chattanooga Police Department

Chattanooga, Tennessee

64. Knoxville Police Department

Knoxville, Tennessee

X

65. Amarillo Police Department

Amarillo, Texas

X

66. Corpus Christi Police Division

Corpus Christi, Texas

X

67. Dallas Police Department

Dallas, Texas

X

68. El Paso Police Department

El Paso, Texas

X

69. Houston Police Department

Houston, Texas

X

70. San Antonio Department of Police

San Antonio, Texas

X

71. Arlington Police Department

Arlington, Virginia

X

72. Newport News Police Department

Newport News, Virginia

XX

COUNTY & MUNICIPAL

NAME AND LOCATION

OF SYSTEM



PRACTITIoNER GROUPS FOR WHOM IN-SERVICE


CENTRAL

FULL-TIME

JUVENILE

OTHER

TRAINING

DIRECTOR OF

RECRUITS

OFFICERS

OFFICERS

UNIT

TRAINING

73. Norfolk Police Division

Norfolk, Virginia

XX

XX

74. Richmond Bureau of Police

Richmond, Virginia

XX

XX

X

75. King County Sheriff's Department

Seattle, Washington

XX

XX

X

76. Spokane Police Department

Spokane, Washington

XX

XX

X1 MD

77. Tacoma Police Department

Tacoma, Washington

XX

X

78. Madison Police Department

Madison, Wisconsin

XX

XX

79. Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department


XX

X

COMMIX AND UNIVERSITINI

The 602 colleges and universities from which data are drawn for this

directory are located in 47 states and the District of Columbia)/

California is represented by the largest number of institutions (87),

followed by New York (51), Pennsylvania (39), Illinois (25), and

Michigan (23). Those states with the smallest representation are

North Dakota (2), Nevada (1), and Maine (1).

Table I below shows the distribution of responding colleges and

universities among nine regions of the country.

TABLE I

RISPONDING ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS, CLASSMED BY MUM

REGION Lk/

New England

Middle Atlantic

East North Central

West North Central

South Atlantic

East South Central

;West South Central

Mbuntain

Pacific

NUMBER OF RESPONDING PER CENT

ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS OF TOTAL

39 6.5

98 16.3

91 15.1

63 10.5

85 14.1

44 7.3

6.9

31 5.1

110 18.3

602 100.1

y The nine regions correspond to those utilized by the Federal Bureau

of Investigation in their Uniform Crime Reports.

I/ Alaska, Nemaii, and Delaware are not represented.

-98-

Minety-nine per cent (402) of responding senior colleges, and

eighty-nine per cent (175) of responding junior colleges are accreditedel(

The 25 non-accredited institutions were included in the survey because

they had been cited in earlier studies as offering an educational

program in one or sore of the Crime and Delinquency fields.

Two-thirds of the responding:academic institutions are four-year

(senior) colleges which offer a baccalaureate degree. The remaining

one-third are two-year (junior) colleges offering an associate degree.

As Shown in Table II below, the relative proportion of responding

senior and junior colleges is virtually identical to their proportion

in the project mailingeW

TABLE II

EMPONDING ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS CLASSIFIED BY COLLEGE MEL

=MAE LEVELACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS RESPONDING ACADEMIC

IN SAMPLE MAILING INSTITUTIONS

(N) % (N) %

Senior (574) 68 (406) 67

Junior (264) 32 (196) 33

TCTAL (838) 100 (602) 100

ji For project purposes, accredited schools are those academic institu-tions designated in Lovejoyls College Guide (88 ed. New York: Simonand Schuster, 1966), as having regional approval and recognition byone of the six regional accrediting associations in the United States.An academic institution which is approved only by a state university,state board, department of education, or a professional associationis considered non-accredited.

V All percentages in this and subsequent tables are rounded for easein reading. The actual sum of rounded percentages is reported inall cases.

-99-

A review of earlier studies, college guides, and college bulletins

revealed a total of 328 academic departments in 318 institutions which

were cited as offering an "educational program" in one or more of the

Crime and Delinquency fields. A detailed questionnaire of 12 pages

(long form) was sent to eadh of the cited "program" departments.1( The

return rate from these departments was 66 per centea(

A briefer questionnaire of 6 pages (short form) was sent to 510

colleges and universities whiCh had not been cited in earlier studies

as offering an "educational program" in the Crime and Delinquency fields)/

These institutions were of two kinds: (1) 83 colleges and universities

with an undergraduate program in social welfare, (2) 427 colleges and

universities representing a one-third random sample of junior colleges

and senior collegese2( The return rate from these 510 colleges and mi-

ffversities vas 75 per cent.

a/questionnaires were addressed personally to the chairman of the depart-

neat or that individual listed as responsible for Crime and Delinquency

programs.N'This includes 149 long-form returns and 68 responses to a shorter

followup questionnaire.2/ questionnaires were addressed directly to the president or chancellor

of the college or university.

41 The original listing for this group consisted of 88 schools located

at accredited senior colleges (listed in an untitled directory com-

piled by the Council on Social Work Education, 1965). Three schools

were reclassified with academic department respondents When they

indicated a Crime and Delinquency program and subsequently completed

a long-form questionnaire. Two other social welfare schools were

excluded from this phase of the study When they were found to offer

a graduate degree program in social work.

y Drawn from a population of all 366 junior colleges and 930 senior

colleges listed in American Council on Mucation, American Junior

Colleges (6111 ed.; Washington, D.C., 1963) and AmeriasWiticesand Collo:tee (91b ed.; 1964), and Lovejoy's College Guide, 221..c t.

The following categories were excluded from the populatioi7fOr purposes

of drawing the samples: (1) institutions cited in earlier studies as

offering an educational program in crime and delinquency; (2) institu-

tions offeringan undergraduate social welfare program; (3) colleges

made up entirely of a single graduate professional school (e.g., law

or medicine); and (4) colleges or universities not regionally

accredited.pi This includes 385 short-form returns. Ninety-one of these responses

merely stated that no course or program in a crime and delinquency

field was offered in any department of the college or university.

-100-

6

Table III below summarizes the rate of questionnaire returns

among these academic groups.

TABLE III

QUESTIONNAIRE RNTURNS AMONG RESPONDING ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONSCLASSIFIED BY CITED "PROGRAMP DESIGNATION

ACADEMIC

Cited asin Crimefield

SUBPOPULATION

offering "Programs"and Delinquency

Not cited

TOTAL

NUMBER OF QUESTIONNAIRESSEW RIMMED

328

510

838

217

385

602

MUM RATE

66

75

72

APPENDIX B

PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLS OF SOCIAL WORK,

CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY , PSYCHIATRY AND LAW

/d;y-103-290-841 0-68-8

The data on educational programs for the fields of Criminal Justice

at professional schools were drawn from four populations an follows:

(I) graduate schools of social tork in the United States accredited by

the Council on Social Work Education; (2) doctoral clinical psychology

programs in the United States approved by the American Psychological

Associationg (3) psychiatric residency centers in the United States

approved by the Council on Medical Education and the American Board of

Phychiatry and Neurologyp2( and (4) law schools approved by the American

Bar Association.

Information in this directory is based upon responses to project

questionnaires from 374 graduate professional schools in the United

States. This represents 76 per cent of all approved professional schools

in the United States from the four populations at the time of survey

(March, 1966 to February, 1967).

Ehch of the four surveys employed a mail questionnaire of approxi-

mately ten pages. An identical followup was sent to nonrespondents

after six weeks. Questionnaire items were highly structured and pre-

coded. Questionnaires were addressed personally to the following:

Council on Social Work Education, Graduate Professional Schools of

Social Work in Canada and the U.S.A., (New York: January, 1965).

Directors of Tres. .: APA A..roved Graduate De-rtments of P cholocan syc..19 5 unp

Association).

y "Approved Residencies - Psychiatry," The Journal of the American Medical

Association, 194 (October-December, 1965), pp.227-235.

ill American Bar Association, "Law Schools on the Approved List of A.B.A.,

1964," Review of Legal Education, Law Schools and Bar Adukssion

Requirements in the United States, (Chicago: Fall, 1964), pp. 4-16.

rom e

-104-

deans and directors of schools of social work; directors of clinical

psychology programs; directors of education programs at psychiatric

residency centers; and deans of schools of law. Approximately two-

thirds of the questionnaires ware filled out by the dean or director;

the renainder were completed by respondents in other administrative or

teaching positions of the school.

5Mestionnaire Returns From the Professional Schools. Table I below

shows the rate of questionnaire returns from each of the four types

of professional schools.

TABLE I

=URN RATE OF PROJECT QUISTIONNAIRES FROM PROFFESIONAL SCHOOLS

TYPE OF SCHOOL

NUMBER OF QUESTIONNAIRES RETURN RATE

SENT RETURNED

Social work 58 50 86

Clinical psychology 67 y 46 70

Psychiatry 234 y 191 82

Law 1332/ 87 65

TOTAL 492 374 76

Ekcludes one school on the approved list which had since discontlnued.

Ekcludes four Centers which had since merged with other Centers.

2/ Excludes one law school which had since discontinued.

The rate of questionnaire returns from professional schools follows

a strikingly even pattern among the nine regions of the United States.

The only major exception appears to be the disproportionately high re-

turn rate from the West North Central region (Iowa, Kansas, Minnesots,

Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota). Table II below

shows the return rate from professional schools by region.

-105-

TABLE II

RErU2N RATE OF PROJECT QUESTIONNAIRES FROM PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLS BY REGION

RETURN RATE IN PER CENTCLINICAL

REGION y SOCIAL WORK PSYCHOLOGY PSYCHIATRY LAW

New England 80 83 88 57

Middle Atlantic 75 62 79 37

East North Central 91 64 77 68

West North Central 100 100 loo 86

South Atlantic 88 67 75 74

East South Central 50 60 86 71

West South Central 100 83 83 60

Mountain 100 60 100 88 .

Pacific 83 33 79 60

TOTAL RErURN RATE 86 70 82 65 .

NUMBER OF SCHOOLS (50) (46) (191) (87)

2/ The nine regions correspond to those utilized by the Federal Bureau

of Investigation in their Uniform Crime Reports.

Schools of social work responding to the project questionnaire are

located in thirty-one states and the District of Columbia. Responding

schools of clinical psychology are located in twenty-two states and the

District of Columbia. Psychiatric residency centers are located in

thirty-six states and the District of Columbia, and responding schools

of law are located in thirty-eight states and the District of Columbia.

New York is represented by the largest number of schools of social work,

clinical psychology, and psychiatric residency centers. California is

represented by the largest number of law schools.

-106-

APPENDIX C

' UNIVERSITY CRIME AND DELINQUENCY CENT=S

Data for this directory were drawn from 74 of the 75 organizations

originally presumed to be University Crime and Delinquency Centers.

Table I below classifies the 75 organizational units included in the

original Mailing. About a third (27) of these organizations met

project criteria for a University Crime and Delinquency Center. Twenty-

three centers offered training programs during both the 1965/66 aud 1966/67

academic years. One Center was operative during the 1965/66 academic

year but terminated at the end of that year. Three Centers did not begin

training operations until September, 1966.

TABLE I

CLASSIFICATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL UNIIS PREVIOUSLY C1TED5(

AS SPECIAL UNIVERSITY CENTERS FOR TRAINING IN THE

CRIMINAL JUSTICE FIELDS

TYPE OF ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT

Special university Centers forCriminal Justice training yAcademic departments for CriminalJustice training

Centers not at a university, orUniversity Centers in fields otherthan Criminal Justice

Special university Centers for Criminal

Justice terminated prior to 1965/66

Special university Centers forCriminal Justice research (only)

No response

TOTAL

RZSPONDEICS(N) %

(27) 36

(32) 43

(10) 13

( 3) 4

( 2) 3

( 1) 1

(75) 100

1/Cited in the literature.b(Centers engaged in training for Criminal justice during the academic

year 1965/66 or 1966/67.

lir A revIew of earlier studies and the relevant literature yielded a pre-

liminary list of 75 "centers" which were cited as offering training for

the criminal justice fields in the academic years 1965/66 or 1966/67.

Queationnaires were mailed to the directors or administrative heads of

eadh "center."

-108-

The Centers for which data are reported are located in 17 states

and the District of Columbia. Five Centers are found in California and

three in Ohio. Illinois, Texas, and the District of Columbia each

have two Centers. The remaining Centers are located in 13 different

states

The distribution of Centers among the nine regions of the country

is shown in Table II below. Seven of the Centers, representing the

largest regional concentration, are found in the East North Central

region. Three regions (New England, East South Central, and Mbuntain)

are represented by one Center each. The other sixteen Centers are fairly

evenly distributed among the remaining regions.

TABLE II

UNIVERSITY CENTERS CLASSIFIED BY REGION

REGION(N)

New Nngland( 1)

Middle Atlantic( 2)

East North Central ( 7)

West North Central ( 3)

South Atlantic( 4)

East South Central( 1)

West South Central ( 3)

Mbuntain( 1)

Pacific( 5)

4

7

26

11

15

4

11

4

19

TOTAL (27) 100

pj The nine regions correspond to those used by the Federal Bureau of

9 Investigation for purposes of their Uniform Crime Reports.

1../ Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri,

New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Utah, Wisconsin.

-109-

A majority of Centers (22) are located at a senior college or

a graduate professional school. The distribution of the Center

population by the level of the college or university at which they

are located is presented below in Table III.

MUMUNIVERSITY CENTERS CLASSIFIED BY LEVEL OF COLLEGE AT WRICR

mu Ala LOCATED

00LLB3E LEVEL (N) %

Junior college ( 3) 11

Senior college y (15) 56

Graduate professional school ( 7) 26

Unclear ( 2) 7

TOTAL (27) 100

2/These do not include centers located at graduate professional sdhools.

f

PROBATIWPAWLE SYSTEM

The 807 probation and parole systems from which data were drawn

for this directory constitute a 49 per cent return of the 1,647 systems

in the United States Which were listed in a comprehensive agency

directory1( and to which project questionnaires were mailed from February

to June, 1966.3(

Table I below shows the distribution of responding probation and

parole systems among nine regions of the United States.

TABLE I

RESPONDING PROBATION AND MOLE SYSTEMS

CLASSIFIED BY REGION

RMIONVNUMBER AND PER CENT OF RESIONDING SYMMS

(N) %

New England (56).

6.9

Middle Atlantic (109)

36..55East North Central (214)

West North Central ( 71) 8.8

South Atlantic (120)

2114.9

East South Central ( 40) 5.0

West South Central ( 55) 6.8

Mbuntain ( 64) 7.9

Pacific ( 77) 9.5

All Regions of the U.SeY ( 1) .1

TOTAL (807) 99.9

The nine regions correspond to those used by the Federal Bureau of

Investigation for purposes of their Uniform Crime Reports. Federal

district probation and parole offices were assigned to the region

containing that city in which the district office was located.

ly Centralized federal systems serving au regions of the country.

1/National Council on Crime and Delinquency, Probation and Parole Direstsm,

U.S. and Canada, (New York: 1963). This directory was updated in 1965---

through correspondence with relevant state departments, and reports

from field staff of the National Couneil on Crime and Delinquency.

Nineteen additional systems were removed from the population (and the

number adjusted to 1,647) due to post office returns for "no such

address" or letters stating that the organization performed no probation/

parole functions or was part of a larger probation/parole system

receiving a project questionnaire.

-112-

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,a,770771,X77,74.,717,774,32 47, 4-777775.77777

The composition of responding probation and parole systems by

function and age of offenders is contained in Table II below.

TABLE II

RESPONDING PROBATION AND PAROLE SYSTEMS CLASSIFIED BY FUNCTION ANDAGE LEVEL OF OFFENDERS

FUNCTION AND AGE NUMBER AND PER CENT OFLEVEL OF OFF/RIDERS RESPONDING SYSTEMS

(N) % il

Probation (only)

Adults (only) (79) 10Juveniles (only) (242) 30Adults and juveniles (170) 21

Sub-total (491) 61

Parole (only)

Adults (only)Juveniles (only)Adults and juveniles

Sub-total

( 16) 2( 10) 1( 4) < 1

( 30) 4

Probation and Parole

Adults (only) ( 23) 3Juveniles (only) (120) 15Adults and juveniles (142) 18

Sub-total (285) 35

Unclear

TOTAL

( 1) < 1

(807) 100

y Percentages are rounded for ease in reading.

-113-

Table III below shows the distribution of responding probation and

parole systems by the level of government at ihich they are located.

TABLE III

QUESTIONNAIRE RETURNS FROM PROBATION AND PAROLE SYSTEMCLASSIFIED BY LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT

GOVERNMENT LEVEL

FederalStateCountyMunicipal

URAL

NUMBER OF QUISTIONNAIRES RETURN RATE

SENT RETURNED

74 47 64

126 80 64

1,355 633 47

92 47 51

1,647 807 49

The probation/parole systems responding to project questionnaires

are located in 49 states and the District of Columbia)/ Michigan is

represented by the largest number of probation/parole systems (70),1

followed by Ohio (57), New York (51), California (43), and Massachusetts

(42). Those states with the smallest representation are Wyoming and

West Virginia (2 each) and Alaska and Vermont (1 each).

A detailed questionnaire of 14 pages (long form) was mailed to 247

probation or parole systems considered most likely to engage in extensive

training. These systems were of the following types: (1) "centralized"

systems on the state and federal levelstY (2) systems with ten or more

full-time probation or parole officerel( on any level of government. The

return rate from these larger systems was 74 per cent.

If Rhode Island in not represented.

3/ Includes all probation/Parole systems located within the state,

regardless of government level.y A centralized" system was defined as one which had probation or

parole jurisdiction over an entire geographical-governmental unit

(e.g., an entire state). A "decentralized" system is operationally

autonomous but has jurisdiction only over one part of a geographical-

governmental unit (e.g., federal district probation/parole offices).

ly This is as indicated in the Probation and Parole tlrectory, Ilk cit.

A briefer questionnaire of four pages (short form) was sent to 1,400

smaller probation/parole systems whose staff included less than ten full-

time probation/parole officerself The return rate from these smaller

systems was 45 per cent. A substantially higher rate of questionnaires

was returned by larger systems than by smaller systems at each of the

four levels of government. Table IV below summarizes the rat of

questionnaire return by government level and size of system.

TABLE IV

QUESTIONNAIRE RETURNS FROM PROBATION AND PAROLE SYSTEMSCLASSIFIED BY LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT AND SIZE OF SYSTEM

LEVEL CT GOVERNMENTAND SIZE OF SYSTEM


SENT RETURNED

Fedral

Large 12 9 75

Small 62 38 61

Stat

Large 91 64 70

Small 35 16 46

County

Large 130 101 78

Small 1,225 532 43

Municipal

Large 14 8 57

Small 78 39 50

TOTALS 1,647 807 49

2/ Follow-up questionnaires to non-respondents were also of the short-

form variety. In all instances, questionnaires were addressedpersonally to the chief probation/parole officer or his administrativeequivaleut.

-115-

The 334 correctional institution systems from which data were

drawn for this directory constitute a 36 per cent return of the 920

correctional institution systems in the United States to which project

questionnaires were directed from February to June, 1966. The return

rate from all correctional institution systems other than jails and

workhouses is 63 per cent.

Table I below ahows the distribution of responding correctional

institution systems among nine regions of the United States.

TABLE I

RESPONDING CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION SYSTEMS CLASSIFIED BY REGION

NUMBER AND PER CENT OF RIMMING SYSZEMS

REGION AL)New England (20) 6.0

Middle Atlantic (43) 12.8

Eaet North Central (55) 16.4

West North Central (44) 13.1

South Atlantic (38) 11.3

East South Central (17) 5.1

West South Central (w) 6.0

Mountain (32) 9.6

Pacific (66) 19.7

All Regions of the U.S. ( 0) 0.0

TOTAL (335).il 100.0

2, Detailed information is lacking for one system; training is there-

fore reported on a total of 334 correctional institution systems.

Table II below shows the distribution of responding correctional

institution systems by level of government and type of system.

-118-

, 4.,

TABLE II

=URNS FROM CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION SYSTEM CIASSIFIED BY LEVELOF GOVERNMENT AND TYPE OF FACILITY

TYPE OF CORRECTIONAL NUMBIN OF QUESTIONNAIRE; =URN RATEINSTITUTION SYSTIX MIT =EKED

State and federal systemswith facilities designed for:

Adults5( only 41

(e.g., prisons andreformatories)

35 85

Juveniles only 44 32 73(e.g., training schools)

Adults and juveniles 15 13 87

80h(Sub-total loo 80

City and county systems withfacilities designed for:

Adults only 488 67 14

(jails and workhouses)

Juveniles only 43 28 65

(training schools)

Adults and juveniles -

Sub-total

Juvenile detention homesg(

Private institutionsfor juveniles

Unclear

TOTALS: All Systems

531 98 19

216 125 58

67 28 42

62( 3E(

920 334 36

e Includes "older youth" not classified as juvenile within theresponding jurisdiction.

Represents 78 state systems and two systems from the Districtof Columbia.

Six systems, originally thought to be county jails, indicatedotherwise. Three of these reported institutional facilitiesfor both admits and juveniles. Tbe remaining three aystemscould not be classified and were designated "unclear."

y Five detention homes are on the state level; three of theseresponded to project questionnaires. All other detention homesare on the city or county level.

-119-290-841 0-68-9

The correctional institution systems responding to project questionp.

naires are located in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. California

is represented by the largest number of correctianal institution systens (45),

followed by Pennsylvania (18), Now York (16), Midhigan (15), and Ohio (15).

Those states with the smallest representation are Maryland, Mississippi,

Montana, Rhode Island, and Vermont, eadh represented by one institutional

system.

A detailed questionnaire of 16 pages (long form) was sent to those 210

institutional systems believed most likely to engage in extensive training

because of larger offender populations, staff size, and/or greater financial

resources. These systems were of the following kves: (1) all systems on the

state and federal levels; (2) county and city training schools for juvenilespg(

and (3) private correctional institutions for juveniles.41( The return rate

from all of these systems was 65 per cent.

y Drawn from: The American Correctional Association, Directory, State

and Federal Correctional Institutions of the United States of America,

Canada, and, and cotland, Washington, D. 1 5 Eight institu-

tional systems from this population were subsequently removed (and the

number adjusted to 100) when eight states initially assumed to administer

their adult and juvenile institutions in two separate systems responded

as one system. The 100 institutional systems included were: 97 under

state jurisdiction, one federal system, and two systems located in

the District of Columbia.

Drawn from: Charles E. Lawrence, Directory of Public Training Schools

Serving Delinquent Children, (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Children's Bureau,

1964). Juvenile state institutions in this directory were excluded

from this category since they had already been included under state

systems. One local juvenile training school originally inaluded in

this population was subsequently removed (and the number adjusted to

43) when we received a letter indicating that it no longer existed.

If Drawn from: (1) Directory for Ekceptional Children, (Boston: Porter

Sargent, 1965); 2 ew York State Department of Social Welfare,

Directo of Child-Carin Institutions and A encies, (New York: 1962).

Two private institutions initially included in this population were

later removed (and the number adjusted to 67) when they sent letters

indicating that they did not accept court referrals and so were not

"correctional" institutions.

-120-

v

4

A briefer questionnaire of six pages (Short form) was sent to 710

institutional systems considered leas likely to engage in training.

This included city and county jails and workhousedd and juvenile

detention homeseY The return rate from these systems (which almost

always consisted of a single institution) was 28 per cent.

y Drawn from an IBM listing of U.S. jails and workhouses compiledby the U.S. Bureau of Prisons in 1964. A one-seventh randomsample was selected from each state because systems of thistype were numerous and were not expected to have extensive in-service training programs. Seven jails originally selected inthis manner were removed from the sample due to post officereturns of "no such address" and inappropriate classification.

2/ Drawn from the following: National Council on Crime and Delinquency,Directory of Detention Homes, (New York: 1964). Seven juveniledetention homes initially included in this population were subse-quently removed (and the number adjusted to 216) due to post officereturns of "no such address" or letters indicating that thedetention home was part of a larger correctional system which hadalso received a project questionnaire.

-121-

117.Irr,,,,,,,,OVING,17,ig,,We, .;,71,

,..1,6.6)ir

APPENDIX F


/,2./ .423-

r ? ".. b r

The 308 law enforcement systems from which data were drawn for

this directory constitute a 41 per cent return of the 759 systems to1/

which project questionnaires were directed from February to June, 1966.-d

questionnaires were returned from large systems at the rate of 66 per cent

and from small systems at the rate of 29 per cent.

Table I below shows the distribution of responding law enforce-

ment systems among nine regions of the United States.

TABLE I

RESPONDING LAW ENFORCEMENT SYSTEMS CLASSIFIEDBY REGION

NUMBER AND PERCENT OF RESPONDING SYSTEMS

REGION

New England (16)

Middle Atlantic (41)

East North Central (52)

West North Central (46)

South Atlantic (37)

East South Central (15)

West South Central (28)

Mountain (25)

Pacific (44)

All regions of the United States ( 4)

(308)

5.2

13.3

16.9

14.9

12.0

4.9

9.1

8.1

14.3

1.3

100.0

Table II below shows the distribution of responding law enforcement

systems by the level of government at which they are located.

1 Drawn from: (1) Law Enforcement Personnel in the U.S. Government,

unpublished), provi i )aton,iLstrasozi n3.tivet

Office of the U.S. Courts in 1965, and (2) The National Police Chiefs

and Sheriffs Information Bureau, The National Directory of Law

Enforcement Administrators, (Milwaukee: 1965).

-124-

TABLE II

QUESTIONNAIRE RETURNS FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT SYSTEMS CLASSIFIEDBY LEVU. OF GOVERNMENT

NUMBER OF QUESTIONNAIRES MOURN RATEGOVERNMENT LEVEL SENT RETURNED 0

Federal5( 8 4 50

Stated, 49 33 67

County 372 104 28

Municipal21' 330 167 51

TOTALS 759 308 41

iv The eight federal systems are as follows: Federal Bureau of Investi-

gation, U.S. Marshals, Immigration and Naturalization Service,

Bureau of Customs, Internal Revenue Service, Bureau of Narcotics,

Bureau of the Postal Inspector, and the U.S. Secret Service.

There are only 49 state law enforcement systems; Hawaii has no lawenforcement department operating at the state level.

2/ The Washington, D.C. police department was classified as a municipal

syst4m.

The law enforcement systems responding to project questionnaires

are located in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. California

is represented by the largest number of law enforcement systems (25),

followed by Texas (17), Ohio (16), New York (15), and New Jersey (13).

Those states with the smallest representation are Arkansas, Delaware,

Maine, Mississippi, New Hempshire, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming,

each represented by one law enforcement system.

A detailed questionnaire of 15 pages (long form) was mailed to

237 law enforcement systems considered most likely to engage in extensive

training. These systems were of the following types: (1) all systems on

the state and federal levels; (2) system in large countiesti( 00 systems

in large municipalities..g/ The return rate from these large systems was

66 per cent.

yr Operationally defined as counties whose county seat had a populationof 250,000 or more.

V Cities with a population of 100,000 or more.

-125-

A briefer questionnaire of six pages (short form) was mailed to

522 law enforcement systems located in smaller counties and municipalities

as follows: (1) a 10 per cent random sample of small counties whose

county seat had a population under 250,000 within each state; (2) a 1/33rd

(3.3 per cent) random sample of small cities (population under 100,000)

within each state. The return rate from these smaller law enforcement

systems was 29 per cent.

Table III below summarizes the rate of questionnaire return by

government level and the size of population in which the law enforcement

system is located.

TABLE III

QUESTIONNAIRE RETURNS FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT SYSTEMS CLASSIFIED

BY LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT AND POPULATION SIZE

LEVEL OF GOVERNMENTAND POPULATION SIZE

FederalLargeSmall

StateLargeSmall

CountyLargeSmall

MunicipalLargeSmall


SENT RETURNED

8

49

4.8324

132198

759

4 50

33 67

22 4682 25

98 7469 35

308 41

Among. the 308 respondents from law enforcement, almost half

(46 per cent) report that their system maintains a separate juvenil

unit to deal with delinquents (N=142). Thirty-nine per cent report,

that their juvenile work is integrated into regular units (N=119).

Fifteen per cent gave no answer or could not be classified (N=47).

*************

-126-

0

Cow C,1%3

tr) (CY3

X0cnp co

r U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE': 965 0-290-841

-waw

a.

U. S

.D

EP

AR

TM

EN

T O

F

HE

ALT

H, E

DU

CA

TIO

N,A

ND

WE

LFA

RE

-

Soc

ial a

nd R

ehab

ilita

tion

Ser

vice

Offi

ce o

fJuv

enile

Del

inqu

ency

and

You

th D

evel

opm

ent

2