ResultsSection

Write a succinct results section This study examined fine motor skills in 20 children (time required to

make origami crane (s)) between males and females at two different ages (7 and 13)

A possible answer.. In this study, we compared fine motor skills between males and

females at ages 7 and 13, using a two-way ANOVA with gender and age as the two between subjects factors. The analysis revealed a significant main effect of gender (F(1, 16) = 125.93, p<0.001), a significant main effect of age (F(1, 16) = 36.94, p<0.001), but no significant interaction between age and gender (F(1, 16) = 0.41, p>0.05). Females completed the origami crane significantly faster than males, regardless of age. Older children (13) also had significantly faster completion rates than younger children (7), irrespective of gender.

97 words Had there been more than 2 levels of either independent variable, I would

have needed results for post-hoc testing

Tables: Headings-Incorrect: ---------------------------------- Temporal lobe: Left Right -----------------------------------Wordy: ---------------------------------- Left Right temporal temporal lobe lobe -----------------------------------Correct: ------------------------- Temporal lobe ----------------------- Left Right--------------------------

Tables-Some notes can be placed below the table.

-Limit the lines to those that are necessary.-Use horizontal rather than vertical lines.

Set Size = 6 Set Size = 12

Tgt. Pres. Tgt. Abs. Tgt. Pres. Tgt. Abs.

Lag 0 2 8 0 2 8 0 2 8 0 2 8

Median RT (ms) 963 968 583 910 662 566 893 630 517 899 661 520

% Correct 96.6 99.0 98.7 97.9 97.0 98.7 97.2 97.6 98.7 95.7 98.6 98.7

Table 1

Mean Median RTs and Percentages of Correct Responses in Experiment 1a

Set Size = 6 Set Size = 12

Tgt. Pres. Tgt. Abs. Tgt. Pres. Tgt. Abs.

Lag 0 2 8 0 2 8 0 2 8 0 2 8

Median RT (ms) 963 968 583 910 662 566 893 630 517 899 661 520

% Correct 96.6 99.0 98.7 97.9 97.0 98.7 97.2 97.6 98.7 95.7 98.6 98.7

Table 1

Mean Median RTs and Percentages of Correct Responses in Experiment 1a

Note – RT = Reaction Time; Tgt. = Target; Pres. = Present; Abs. = Absent; ms = milliseconds

Table 1: Correlation matrix between belief that atheists are common (BAC), Belief in a Dangerous World (BDW), belief in God (BiG), and explicit negative attitudes towards atheists (NATA).

Measure   BAC BDW BiG NATA  

BAC -- 0.14 0.04 -0.15

BDW -- 0.16 0.36*

BiG -- 0.55*

NATA         --  

*p < 0.01

See p.163 of 5th manual for sample regression table

Graphs: Labels

Label

Label

UnacceptableLabel

Long,wordy,label

UndesirableLabel

Labe

l

Optimal

Example Figure CaptionsFigure Captions

Figure 1: Mean amount of money offered to the “Responder”, showing no significant main effect of the “Responder’s” religious affiliation or the participants’ belief in God. There was no significant interaction between these factors. Error bars represent +/- 1 standard deviation.

Figure 2: Mean amount of money offered to the atheist “Responder” by participants who reported belief in God and those who did not. There were no significant differences between the groups. Error bars represent +/- 1 standard deviation.

Figure 3: Correlation between belief in God and explicit negative attitudes towards atheists (NATA) (p < 0.01).

Figure 4: Correlation between explicit negative attitudes towards atheists (NATA) and the amount of money offered to the atheist responder (p > 0.05).

Figure 5: Correlation between Belief in a Dangerous World and explicit negative attitudes towards atheists (NATA) (p < 0.01).

DiscussionReferencesAppendixes FootnotesTablesFigure CaptionsFigures

Comparing Groups – One IV

Main Effects and Interactions (2+ IV’s)

Main Effects and Interactions (2+ IV’s)

Experiment 1

230

240

250

260

270

280

290

300

310

Invalid Valid Color Valid

Target Location

Rea

ctio

n Ti

mes

(in

mill

isec

onds

)

Instructions

No Instructions

Correlation

Grading Scheme /30 (/15)

Figures and Tables (/10) Have descriptive statistics been provided in either a table or

graph? Are the graphs simple and easy to read? Are all figures and tables labelled appropriately?

Content and Grammar: (/15) Were the statistical tests applied appropriately? Is there rational given for atypical tests used? Are results provided with appropriate/adequate information

(obtained F value, df, level of significance)? Were the results discussed in sufficient detail?

Style: (/5) Includes APA formatting and use of headings, etc. to convey

information; proper use of reporting p values etc.