results from the 2005 educational technology surveys cara lane research scientist catalyst research...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys
Cara LaneResearch Scientist
Catalyst Research and DevelopmentOffice of Learning Technologies
![Page 2: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Project Collaborators
Office of Learning Technologies Office of Undergraduate Education
Office of Educational Assessment Classroom Support Services
Computing & Communication UW Libraries Office of Educational Outreach Student Technology Fee Committee
![Page 3: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Report
Full report: http://catalyst.washington.edu/projects
Contents: Acknowledgements Methods Results Conclusions and recommendations
![Page 4: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Response Details
Instructor survey Sample size: 4,390 Response Rate: 34.4%
Student survey Sample size: 3,500 Response rate: 28.2%
Focus groups 40 instructors and 25 students
![Page 5: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Faculty Demographics
Respondents 884
Average Age 50
Gender 61% male 39% female
RANK
38%
20%
15%
20%
7%
Full AssociateAssistant LecturerInstructor
![Page 6: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Undergraduate Demographics
Respondents 648
Average Age 22
Gender 39% male 61% female
CLASS
16%
14%
36%
34%
Freshman Sophomore
Junior Senior
![Page 7: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Finding
Support for technology facilities and services is high
![Page 8: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Faculty Quote
“Labs are everywhere, they’re all over the place, they’re readily available, and they’re economical to use. So I can freely give assignments and have projects and homework that require a computer now and students can go and do them.”
![Page 9: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Finding
Strong interest in Web-based tools
![Page 10: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Online Portfolios
Which of the following educational technologies would like instructors to use in your courses?
50% Online Portfolios 46% Computer simulations 38% Streaming Videos 26% Instant messaging 14% Video Conferencing
![Page 11: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Finding
Wireless in classrooms will increase laptop use during class sessions
![Page 12: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Laptop Ownership
Fa
cu
lty
UG
rad
s
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Own laptop
![Page 13: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Laptops in Classrooms
Fa
cu
lty
UG
rad
s
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Current use w/ wireless in rooms
![Page 14: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Undergraduate Quote
“The things that will make wireless really powerful will be new applications that begin to use that connectivity to do new things”
![Page 15: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Finding
Correlation between gender and tech skills
![Page 16: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Expertise by Group
Fac
ult
y
Ug
rad
s
0
10
20
30
40
50
Per
cen
tag
e
Beginner Intermediate Expert Advanced
![Page 17: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Expertise by Gender
Faculty Women
UGrad Women
FacultyMen
UGrad Men
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Per
cen
tag
e
Advanced/Expert
![Page 18: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Finding
Undergraduates use more types of technology for academic purposes than faculty do
![Page 19: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Academic Use of IM
Fa
cu
lty
UG
rad
s
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Use IM
![Page 20: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Finding
Faculty want better access to technology in classrooms
![Page 21: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Opportunities to Use Technology
The UW should provide more opportunities to use educational technologies 73% agree
How? #1: Improve access to technology in
classrooms
![Page 22: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Faculty Quote
“Most lecture halls are equipped with the appropriate technology, but most smaller classrooms are not. If you invest the time to use technology in a 50-person class and don’t know if you are going to get the same classroom every year, the significant cost of transformation may not pay off in the event that you do not get an equipped classroom again.”
![Page 23: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Finding
Undergraduates want course materials available online
![Page 24: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
The UW Should Require all Courses to have Web Sites
Fac
ult
y
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
AgreeStrongly
AgreeSomewhat
Neutral DisagreeSomewhat
DisagreeStrongly
![Page 25: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Undergraduate Quote
“Something that would help support my learning would be having more information about a course online, especially requiring professors to put a syllabus on a Web site. It would be nice to look on the teacher’s Web site and see all the assignments. That would be fantastic.”
![Page 26: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Finding
Teaching assistants and graduate students that do not teach have different attitudes towards technology
![Page 27: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Demographics
Graduate Students Respondents
286 Average Age
32 Gender
39% male 61% female
Teaching Assistants Respondents
411 Average Age
29 Gender
44% male 56% female
![Page 28: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
The UW should Provide Guidance in Building Online Portfolios
Fac
ult
y
Ug
rad
s
Gra
d S
tud
ents
TA
s0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Agree
![Page 29: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Laptops for Students
Gra
d S
tud
ents T
As
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Detracts Enhances
![Page 30: Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56649efd5503460f94c11622/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Next Steps
Current Partners are using survey results to
inform decisions ECAR survey
Future Repeating surveys every 3 years Next survey in spring 2008