results and discussion collection and...
TRANSCRIPT
59
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Collection and screening of plant material for potent gold and silver nanoparticle
synthesis
Collection of Plants and Extract preparation
The healthy leaves of Cassia auriculata, Cassia tora, Cassia occidentalis, Cassia
sophera, Cassia fistula were collected from the botanical garden Gulbarga University,
Gulbarga. The leaves were gently washed with soap solution and bavistine to remove the
dust and any other contaminants, shade dried at room temperature. Dried leaves were
powdered and 5% of aqueous extracts were prepared by boiling the leaf powder in
distilled water for 5-10minutes, centrifuged and supernatants were used as reducing
agent.
Screening and Biosynthesis of AuNPs and AgNPs
Initially, the color of the reaction mixture confirmed the reduction AuNPs and AgNPs
obtained by adding the leaf extracts into 1mM chloroauric chloride and silver nitrate
aqueous solution (Plate-2, Fig.1a & b), various colors of the gold nanoparticles and
brown color of silver nanparticles were observed. Extracellular synthesis of AgNPs and
AuNPs was observed in three plants i.e, Cassia auriculata, Cassia fistula and Cassia tora
whereas intracellular synthesis was observed in Cassia occidentalis and Cassia sophera.
In extracellular gold nanoparticle synthesis the color varies depending on the size and
shape of the AuNPs, smaller particles appears pink while large particles appear purple.
Intracellular synthesis of AgNPs and AuNPs is not yet fully understood. Intracellular
60
synthesis always takes longer reaction times and also demands subsequent extraction and
recovery steps. Hence we have concentrated on extracellular synthesized nanoparticles
for further characterization and bioassay. Senapati et al. (2012) reported the intracellular
production of gold nanoparticles using an alga Tetraselmis kochinensis. Rai & Durn
(2011) stated the mechanism for intra and extracellular synthesis of nanoparticles differs
in various biological agents. Basavaraja et al. (2008) reported about the significant brown
color of extracellular synthesized silver nanoparticles. The increase in color intensity with
incubation time revealed enhanced nanoparticles synthesis. The size of the nanoparticles
depends on color of the colloidal solution (Jain et al. 2006). Vahabi et al. (2011)
explained the color intensity, indicates the reduction of ions and formation of
nanoparticles due to excitation of surface plasmon resonance of the metallic
nanoparticles. (Table.2) shows the UV-Visible spectra of the synthesized AuNPs and
AgNPs, time taken for reduction size and color of the nanoparticles.
Cassia Plant
Time for reduction
of Nanoparticles
Wavelength /
Particle Size (nm)
Gold Silver Gold Silver
1. Cassia auriculata (E)
2. Cassia fistula (E)
3. Cassia occidentalis(I)
4. Cassia sophera(I)
5. Cassia tora(E)
8 min
25 min
4 hours
24 hours
24 hours
3 min
15 min
1hours
24hours
24hours
535
556
545
-
-
14
29
23
-
-
427
441
432
-
-
17
35
21
-
-
Table.2. Time of reduction, wavelength and size of AuNPs and AgNPs of Cassia species.
(E- Extracellular, I- Intracellular synthesis).
61
Hence both extra and intracellular synthesis of AuNPs and AgNPs were observed in
screening and based on the results obtained we decided to carry work on Cassia
auriculata.
Phytochemical Analysis
The results of preliminary phytochemical analysis of aqueous leaf extracts revealed
relative distribution of the secondary metabolites responsible for the reduction of
AuNPs and AgNPs. Phytochemical analysis reveals presence of phenols, flavoniods,
terpenoids, tannins, cardiac glycosides, sterols and saponins (Table.3).
Medicinally valuable angiosperms have the greatest potential for the synthesis of metallic
nanoparticles with respect to quality and quantity (Song and Kim 2009). Medicinal plants
possess important phytochemicals and active compounds which are medicinally valuable
and exhibit significant properties in the treatment of various diseases. These
phytochemicals are not only important in medicines, but also responsible for the
reduction and stabilization of metal nanoparticles. Shukla et al. (2008) Li et al. (2007),
Jacob et al. (2008) reported that the phytochemicals such as water soluble proteins,
polyphenols, and sugars present in plant extracts plays a significant role in reducing and
stabilizing the NPs. Ankamwar et al. (2005b) reported the antibacterial and antioxidant
properties of biomolecules present in the plant extract have facilitated excellent stability
of the nanoparticles. Most of these phytochemicals are water soluble and can be easily
extracted in water without losing their properties. Such phytochemicals act as metal
reducing and capping agents, there by resulting in one step biosynthesis of metal
nanoparticles.
62
The main water soluble phytochemicals are flavones, organic acids, proteins and
quinones responsible for immediate reduction. According to Hemen Dave et al. (2012),
the genus Cassia have important source of naturally occurring bioactive quinones and
secondary metabolites which might have helped in rapid reduction of nanoparticles.
Therefore compared to bacteria and fungi, plants are better candidates for the rapid
synthesis of nanoparticles. Polarity based fractionation leads to the separation of only
Table.3. Phytochemicals screening of Cassia species. CA:Cassia auriculata, CF: Cassia
fistula, CT: Cassia tora, CS: Cassia sophera, CO: Cassia occidentalis
63
water soluble bioactive components. However Shankar et al. (2004), Parashar et al.
(2009), Elavazhagan et al. (2011) described various extraction procedures for plant
extract preparation from green and dry leaves (upon boiling). Philip et al. (2011) reported
that saponin present in aqueous extract was responsible for the mass production of silver
and gold nanoparticles. Jha et al. (2009) assumed the formation of pure metallic
nanoparticles and bimetallic nanoparticles by reduction of the metal ions was possibly
facilitated by reducing sugars or terpenoids. Jiang et al. (2006) reported that
phytochemicals were directly involved in the reduction of ions and formation of silver
nanoparticles. However Xie et al. (2007) assumed that these polyphenolic compounds,
quinones and other coordinating phytochemicals present in the leaf extract aided in
stabilization of AuNPs. Proteins, polysaccharide and phytochemicals play a role in the
synthesis of AgNPs and AuNPs (Park et al. 2011, Rai et al. 2009).
Characterization of Nanoparticles
UV-Vis Spectroscopy
The formation of various nanoparticles from their different salts gives characteristic
peaks at different absorptions due to surface plasmon resonance. As the plant extract was
mixed in the aqueous solution of ion complex, the color started changing from ruby red
and brown due to reduction of ions and excitation of surface plasmon vibrations, which
indicate the formation of nanoparticles.
64
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR)
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy is a chemical analytical technique. It is
used to determine the nature of associated molecules of plants or their extracts with
nanoparticles. Based upon the wavenumber, infrared light can be categorized as far
infrared (4-400 cm−1
), mid infrared (400-4000cm-1
) and near infrared (4000-14000cm-1
).
Transmission electron microscopy
It is mainly used for size and morphological studies of nanoparticles.
X-ray diffraction (XRD)
This technique is used to establish the metallic nature of particles. X-rays are
electromagnetic radiation with typical photon energies in the range of 100eV-100keV,
short-wavelength X-rays (hard X-rays) in the range of a few angstroms to 0.1 Å (1-120
keV) are used. The formation of nanoparticles synthesized was further supported by X-
ray diffraction (XRD) measurements. The Bragg reflections corresponding to the (111),
(200), (220), (310) sets of lattice planes were observed that may be indexed on the basis
of the FCC structure of gold and silver NPs. All the peaks match well with the standard
JCPDS file 04-0783. The XRD pattern clearly shows nature of nanoparticles.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) is a thermodynamic technique measures the change
of mass as a function of temperature in a preselected environment. Data obtained from
this technique are usually expressed in percentage weight loss versus temperature, and
65
this is quite useful in evaluating the thermal stability and reaction rates at various
atmospheric conditions. It is also a good method for establishing purity of materials.
Effect of Leaf extracts concentration on formation of Gold Nanoparticles
Dried leaves were powdered and aqueous extract of Cassia auriculata was prepared with
different concentrations (1%, 5%, and 10%) by boiling the powder in double distilled
water, filtered and supernatant was used as reducing agent and 1mM tetracholoroauric
acid (HAuCl4) was kept constant. The procedures were performed at room temperature.
As the concentration of leaf extract increased there was an increase in particle size in
AuNPs. 1% leaf extract mediated synthesis resulted in ruby red color of the solution due
to surface plasmon resonance which confirms the formation of nanoparticles. UV-Vis
spectra reveals absorbance at 540nm, crystallite size of nanoparticle calculated by XRD
was 10nm and TEM image shows particles were spherical and polydispersed (Plate-3,
Figure.2). Reduction time for the synthesis was 1minute in all the three solution. 3% of
leaf extract mediated synthesis resulted in blue color of the solution which confirms the
formation of nanoparticles. UV-Vis spectra reveals absorbance at 534nm, crystallite size
of nanoparticle was 12nm and TEM image shows particles were spherical and
polydispersed (Plate-4, Figure.3). 10% of leaf extract mediated synthesis resulted in blue
color of the solution which confirms the formation of nanoparticles. UV-Vis spectra
reveals absorbance at 530nm, crystallite size of nanoparticle was 15nm and TEM image
shows particles were spherical and polydispersed (Plate-5, Figure.4). The concentrations
of leaf extract have affected the particles size but have no effect on shape of the
nanoparticles.
66
Effect of HAuCl4 concentration on Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles
It has been reported that the nanoparticles size and shape mainly depends on different
factors like concentration of leaf extract, salt solution, PH and temperature (Armendariz
et al. 2004, Rai et al. 2006). Three concentrations (0.5mM, 1mM and 2mM) of HAuCl4
were used by keeping the leaf extract concentration 1% as constant. It was observed that
there was not much difference on particles size and morphology. 1% of leaf extract and
0.5mM Tetracholoroauric acid (HAuCl4) mediated synthesis resulted in blue color of the
solution which confirms the formation of nanoparticles. UV-Vis spectra reveals
absorbance at 530nm, crystallite size of nanoparticle by XRD calculation was 14nm and
TEM image shows particles were spherical and polydispersed (Plate-6, Figure.5). 1% of
leaf extract and 2mM tetracholoroauric acid (HAuCl4) mediated synthesis resulted in
ruby red color which confirms the formation of nanoparticles. UV-Vis spectra reveals
absorbance at 535nm, crystallite size of nanoparticle by XRD calculation was 20nm and
TEM image shows particles were spherical and polydispersed (Plate-7, Figure.6).
Synthesis and Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles
Effects of Leaf extract concentration on Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles
For the synthesis of silver nanoparticles the three different concentrations (1%, 5%, and
10%) of leaf extracts of Cassia auriculata were prepared by boiling the powder in double
distilled water, filtered and supernatant was used as reducing agent. The concentration of
Silver nitrate (AgNO3) was kept constant (1mM). As the concentration of leaf extract
increased there was decrease in particle size of AgNPs. 1% leaf extract mediated
synthesis resulted in brown color of the solution due to surface plasmon resonance which
67
confirms the formation of silver nanoparticles. UV-Vis spectra reveals absorbance at
435nm, crystallite size of nanoparticle was 35nm and TEM images shows particles are
spherical and polydispersed (Plate-8, Figure.7). Reduction time for the synthesis was 4-6
minutes in all the three solution. 3% leaf extract mediated synthesis resulted in brown
color of the solution which confirms the formation of nanoparticles. UV-Vis spectra
reveals absorbance at 430nm, crystallite size of nanoparticle by XRD calculation was
25nm and TEM images shows particles were spherical and polydispersed (Plate-9,
Figure.8). 5% leaf extract mediated synthesis resulted in dark brown color of the solution
which confirms the formation of nanoparticles. UV-Vis spectra reveals absorbance at
420nm, crystallite size of nanoparticle was 11nm and TEM image shows particles were
spherical and polydispersed (Plate-10, Figure.9). The concentrations of leaf extract have
affected the particles size but no difference was observed in morphology of the silver
nanoparticles. There was no marked difference in the shape at various biomaterial
dosages as reported by Huang et al. (2007).
Effect of AgNO3 concentration on synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles
Three concentrations (0.5mM, 1mM and 2mM) of AgNO3 were used by keeping the leaf
extract concentration 1% as constant. Varying the concentrations of AgNO3 did not show
much difference on morphology of silver nanoparticles.
1% of leaf extract and 0.5mM AgNO3 mediated synthesis resulted in brown color of the
solution which confirms the formation of nanoparticles. UV-Vis spectra reveals
absorbance at 450nm, crystallite size of nanoparticle by XRD calculation was 20nm and
TEM image shows particles were spherical and polydispersed (Plate-11, Figure.10). 1%
68
of leaf extract and 2mM AgNO3 mediated synthesis resulted in ruby red color of the
solution which confirms the formation of nanoparticles. UV-Vis spectra reveals
absorbance at 440nm, crystallite size of nanoparticle by XRD calculation was 30nm and
TEM image shows particles were spherical and polydispersed (Plate-12, Figure.11).
Engineered AgNPs are typically stabilized against aggregation through adsorption or
covalent attachment of organic compounds prior to evaluating their environmental fate
and toxic effects. These molecules on the surface of the nanoparticles provide
electrostatic, steric, or electrosteric repulsive forces between particles, allowing them to
resist aggregation (Hotze et al. 2010). These molecules, if applied during synthesis, are
also often referred to as “capping agents” and allow the control of size and shape (Wiley
et al. 2005).
Rapid Phytosynthesis and Characterization of Gold and Silver Nanoparticles under
Microwave Irradiation
The biosynthesis of nanoparticles was performed under microwave oven using 1%
Cassia auriculata leaf extract and 1mM salt solution. Leaf extract was taken in a 250 mL
conical flask and immediately the whole mixture was put in a domestic microwave oven
(Samsung Model GW73BD). The mixture was subjected to several short burst of
microwave irradiation as described in Materials and Methods. The reduction of aqueous
AuCl4 ions during reaction with the Cassia auriculata leaf extract was followed by UV-
Vis spectroscopy. It was found that the colorless solution turned ruby red within 30
seconds of microwave irradiation, the UV-Vis absorption spectra recorded shows a strong
resonance at 524 nm and peaks arises due to the excitation of surface plasmon vibrations
in the gold nanoparticles, crystallite size of nanoparticle by XRD calculation was 15nm
69
and TEM images shows particles are spherical and polydispersed (Plate-13, Figure.12).
The ability of microwave irradiation to bring about reduction of Au+ to Au
0 within 30sec
indicates the superiority of this method. However in case of silver nanoparticles synthesis
the reduction of aqueous Ag ions during reaction with the Cassia auriculata leaf extract
may be easily followed by UV-Vis spectroscopy. The solution started changing the color
from yellowish to brown in 55 seconds due to reduction of silver ions, which indicates
formation of silver nanoparticles (Lopez et al. 2013). The UV-Vis absorption spectra
recorded shows a strong resonance at 440 nm due to the excitation of surface plasmon
vibrations in the silver nanoparticles, crystallite size of nanoparticles calculated by XRD
was 15nm and TEM images shows particles were spherical and polydispersed (Plate-14,
Figure.13). We reported fastest synthesis as compared to others who got in 90secs
(Deshpande et al. 2011) and 5minutes (Renugadevi et al. 2012). The template method
provides good control over the shape and dimensions of nanoparticles and is faster under
the microwave irradiation method. The microwave irradiation effectively utilizes the
internal heat generated within the matrix and is able to bring about the complete
reduction within short duration of time. The solution containing ions moves through the
solution under the influence of an electric field, resulting in expenditure of energy due to
an increased collision rate, converting the kinetic energy to heat.
70
Rapid Phytosynthesis and Characterization of Gold and Silver Nanoparticles under
Sunlight Irradiation
Sunlight-induced rapid synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles was investigated. Leaf
extract (1%) Cassia auriculata was treated with 1mM tetracholoroauric acid and silver
nitrate in a separate conical flask and were irradiated to sunlight during the summer,
afternoon of a sunny day 45º C temperature was recorded. It was found that the colorless
solution turned ruby red within 55 seconds and reddish brown within 1minute of sunlight
exposure. The UV-Vis absorption spectra of gold nanoparticles recorded at 540nm,
crystallite size calculated by XRD was 10nm and TEM images shows particles were
spherical and polydispersed (Plate-15, Figure.14). The UV-Vis absorption spectra of
silver nanoparticles was recorded at 440nm, crystallite size was 20nm and TEM images
shows particles were spherical and polydispersed (Plate-16, Figure.15). The visible light
radiation significantly prompted the synthesis of silver NPs using a culture supernatant of
the Klebsiella pneumonia bacterium (Mokhtari et al. 2009). Ravishankar et al. (2011)
reported the AgNPs synthesis within 1minute from Pleurotus florida extract. Karimi
Zarchi et al. (2012) synthesized smaller sized biogenic silver NPs were fabricated under
direct sunlight radiation. The concentrations used and particles size obtained of
biosynthesized gold and silver nanoparticle during the course of work given in (Table.3).
71
FTIR analysis
The FTIR spectrum indicates various functional groups present at different positions. IR
spectroscopy study has confirmed that the carbonyl group of amino acid residues and
peptides of proteins has a stronger ability to bind metal, so that the proteins could most
possibly form a coat over the metal nanoparticles (i.e., capping of AuNP and AgNP) to
prevent the agglomeration of the particles, and thus stabilized in the medium. The peaks
in the region between 3412 cm-1
to 2849 cm-1
were assigned to O-H stretching of alcohol
Table. 3. Particles size of Gold and Silver nanoparticles synthesized from Cassia
auriculata leaf extract
72
and phenol compounds and aldehyde –C-H- stretching of alkanes. The peaks in the
region 1597 cm-1
to 1508 cm-1
and 1385 cm-1
to 827 cm-1
corresponds to N-H(bond) of
primary and secondary amides and –C-N- stretching vibration of amines or –C-O-
stretching of alcohols, ethers, carboxylic acids and anhydrides (Plate-17, Figure.16). The
presence of important phytochemicals (Usha & Bopaiah 2012) and essential amino acids
(Gaikwad et al. 2010) in C. auriculata might have facilitated the synthesis and
stabilization of nanoparticles. The FTIR analysis reveals the dual function of biological
molecules, which might contribute to the reduction and stabilization of gold and silver
nanoparticles in the aqueous medium.
Identification of Protein Capped on Gold and Silver Nanoparticles
Protein polar groups interact with polar solvent and get dissolved. The proteins identified
in aqueous dry leaves extract are polar proteins. The estimated amount of proteins found
associated with the AuNPs (120µg/mg), AgNPs (144µg/mg) and plant extract
(190µg/mg). The SDS analysis revealed presence of two proteins of 15kD and 42kD.
(Plate-18, Figure.17) shows the bands of proteins present in plant extract and associated
with AuNPs and AgNPs. The observation specifies the presence and binding of proteins
with nanoparticles which lead to their possible stabilization and functionalization of NPs.
The presence of proteins was also confirmed by FTIR analysis of Cassia auriculata
(Udayasoorian et al. 2011). The peaks were assigned to stretching of N-H, O-H and C=O
of primary and secondary amides. These proteins could be responsible for the synthesis
as well as stability of nanoparticles. Hence water soluble phytochemicals and water
soluble proteins facilitated the reduction of nanoparticles and immediately proteins may
adsorbed on the surface of nanoparticles making the solution stable. Previous studies
73
show that the proteins get bound to surface of nanoparticles immediately upon contact
(Elechiguerra et al. 2005). We believed sooner the proteins gets adsorbed to the
nanoparticles lesser will be the particle size leading to stabilization. Kaur et al. (2009)
suggested impact of proteins on the shape of SeNPs. The proteins can bind to the gold
and silver nanoparticles either through free amine groups or cysteine residues (Gole et al.
2001). Maliszewska et al. (2013) demonstrated the stabilization of silver nanoparticles
occurs by electrostatic repulsion due to the negative charge of protein molecules, and
conformational changes occur when proteins adsorb onto nanoparticles (Fei et al. 2009).
Gaikwad et al. (2010) detected ten amino acids in the leaves of Cassia auriculata.
Among that D-Threonine, L-Ornithrine hydrochloride, Aspartic acid, L-Cystine and
Hydroxyproline were polar. The reported proteins have significant role in plant and
human as well which makes the NPs biocompatible. There might be possibility that these
polar proteins have assisted in reduction and stabilization of nanoparticles. (Plate-19,
Figure.18) shows the hypothesized mechanism of reduction and stabilization of NPs.
Peptides of proteins possesses strong ability to stick on metals due to adsorption and
forms coating over the nanoparticles (capping of AgNP/AuNP). This prevents
agglomeration of the particles in the medium. Adsorption of proteins at the nano-bio
interface is assisted by several forces such as hydrogen bonds, solvation forces, Van der
Waals interactions etc. The binding of amines on gold nanoparticles was reported in
Cinnamomum zeylanicum (Rai & Durn 2011). The proteins were active biomolecule
present in the plants responsible for the reduction of noble metal nanoparticles (Sheny et
al. 2011). Fayaz et al. (2011) reported involvement of tyrosine residue in the reduction of
gold ion from Maduca longifolia extract. Capping agents have become increasingly
74
prevalent in NP synthesis and are primarily used to stabilize the highly reactive NP
surfaces (Dylan et al. 2011). Organic molecules bound to the NP core impart stability
through electrostatic repulsion, steric stabilization or a combination of both mechanisms
(Lead et al. 2009). In addition to stabilizing properties, capping agents were also utilized
to alter surface chemistry of NPs for specific applications such as drug delivery, to
control size and shape during NP synthesis (Tolaymat et al. 2010, Murugadoss et al.
2010).
Immobilization study of AuNPs and AgNPs
In the present investigation we have developed a simple, inexpensive and well-suitable
network hydrogel system, effectively used for obtaining highly dispersed nanoparticles
by using Cassia auriculata leaf extract as reducing agent. The swollen hydrogel acts as
the nanoreactors that immobilize the nanoparticles, offering large free space between the
cross-linked networks for the nucleation and growth of the nanoparticles. Alginate has
potential to form edible films, exhibit poor water resistance due to hydrophilicity owing
to presence of carboxylic and hydroxyl groups. Alginate has been cross-linked with
divalent Ca2+
which can ionically interact to produce strong gels or insoluble polymers.
Preparation and Characterization of Au-BNC and Ag-BNC
The alginate hydrogel was prepared by gel casting technique. Pure alginate films were
transparent, however the gold containing film was pink, characteristic color of gold
nanoparticles (Peter 2011), and silver containing films were brown which is characteristic
of silver nanoparticles (Liz-Marzan 2004). The formation of the nanoparticles in the
hydrogel networks was indicated by the appearance of color (Plate- 20, Figure.19).
75
UV-Visible spectra of Bionanocomposite
Pure alginate did not show any absorbance in the visible region, whereas AuNPs and
AgNPs embedded film had an absorbance centered at 526nm and 424nm. The absorbance
was due to the reduction of ions and excitation of surface plasmon vibrations, which
indicate the formation nanoparticles (Kuila et al. 2007, Zhang et al. 2008) and confirms
the nanoparticle formation (Plate-20, Figure.20). The gel had diverse surface charges and
sizes of the AgNPs inside which caused expansion of the hydrogel networks (Murali
Mohan et al. 2006). The immobilization of nanoparticles has strong localization of
particles within the gel networks. Therefore, plant extract can stimulate the nanoparticles
stabilization to a greater extent when compared to conventional hydrogel systems where
chemicals methods are used for immobilization of metal nanoparticles on alginate films
(Anubha et al. 2009, Sandip et al. 2010, Vincent et al. 2010).
FT-IR analysis
FT-IR spectroscopy confirmed chemical structure and potential interactions between
alginate and nanoparticles. The peak at 3268cm-1
represents –OH stretching frequency
due to hydrogen bonding, while in the region 1590-1000cm-1
represents C=O stretching
of carboxylic acid, ethers, esters or N–H bending (amide II) present due to plant extract.
The band at 1026cm-1
related to O-glycosidic bonding between β-D-mannuronic and α-L-
guluronic acid residues and indicates the degree of stability of the linear chain in the
alginate (Torres et al. 2005). The peaks near 500cm-1
region represents the formation of
metallic bonding formed due to AuNPs and AgNPs (Plate-21, Figure.21).
76
TEM images of Gold and Silver Bionanocomposites
TEM images of Au-BNC and Ag-BNC shows the particles were uniform, spherical and
discrete with particle size varies between 5-15nm (Plate-22, Figure.22). Most of the
nanoparticles were separated from each other due to protection by alginate which
indicates good stabilization.
Measurement of dry films width
The width of AuNPs and AgNPs embedded dry films were measured by using
micrometer and found 0.8µm of gold film and 1.3µm of silver film.
Fresh and Dry weight/ Moisture content
The fresh weight of AgNPs containing film was about 15.66mg and AuNPs film was
15.33mg, similarly dry weight Ag-BNC was 3.33mg and Au-BNC was 2.77mg. The
weight loss observed in Au-BNC was 79.66% and Ag-BNC was 88.57%.
Swelling and degrading studies
The swelling behavior of an antibacterial film is an important aspect of its successful
biomedical application. The invitro degradability of the composite was performed by
soaking the dry hydrogels in phosphate buffer (pH-7.0) commonly used in biological
research and distilled water. The dry films soaked in double distilled water have shown
slight swelling after 2days and no signs of degradation were observed even after a month.
The dry films started swelling in 2 minutes and completely degraded within 6 minutes in
phosphate buffer. The osmolarity and ion concentrations of the buffer matches those of
the human body, hence these composites can be exploited in drug delivery applications.
The films obtain a high swelling degree in a short period of time, causing their
dissolution due to ionic changes between the calcium ions present in the hydrogel
77
structure present in the medium. The ionic strength of the medium influences the swelling
capacity of ionic gels (Ravindra et al. 2012). Therefore, the use of biopolymer,
biodegradable and biocompatible cross-linked hydrogel templates are more convenient
for developing metal nanoparticles than conventional non-aqueous systems of non
biocompatible polymeric systems for biomedical applications (Brandon et al. 2009,
Armentano et al. 2010).
Thermal Studies
The thermal analysis (TGA) graphs (Plate-22, Figure.23) of Au-BNC and Ag-BNC film
shows the weight loss took place in three steps. In the first step 10.33%-15.89% weight
losses was observed between 100-180°C due to absorbed moisture of hydroxyl molecules
present in the biopolymer. The second major weight loss of 37.72% was observed from
200-450°C due to organic moieties present around the noble metal nanoparticles with the
presence of alginic polymer network. The last stage where 5-23% weight loss occurred
from 500-870°C due to decomposition of Ca+. The remaining 30-40 % residue is AuNPs
and AgNPs respectively. Hence the multistep gravimetric study indicates good thermal
stability of Au-BNC and Ag-BNC films as compared to reported earlier (Murthy et al.
2008, Yonghyun Kim et al. 2011, Ravindra et al. 2012, Madhusudana Rao et al. 2013).
Application Studies
Antimicrobial assay
From the onset of nanotechnology the antimicrobial effect of silver nanoparticles has
regained its lost status and thus provides a faster wound healing along with its efficacy
against microbial resistance to antibiotics.
78
Antimicrobial assay of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles was examined against gram
negative bacteria E. coli and gram positive B. subtilis, fungal strains like A. niger and A.
flavus. The AgNPs shows significant inhibitory activity against bacteria and fungi.
AgNPs exerted highest toxicity against A. niger and intermediary effects on E. coli,
B. subtilis and A. flavus (Plate-23, Figure. 24 & 25). AgNPs synthesized at 5%
concentration were found to be significantly toxic to the fungi whereas standard antibiotic
Clotrimazole did not show any zone of inhibition at 50µg/ml on A.niger (Plate-24,
Figure.26 & 27). AgNPs synthesized at 3 % concentration were found better on bacteria
tested followed by 1%. The maximum toxicity observed in AgNPs synthesized from 3%
and 5% of leaf extracts. The zone of inhibition in figures and graphical presentation given
in plates mentioned above. The reason could be that the smaller size of the particles leads
to increased membrane permeability and cell destruction. Our results are in agreement
with Boswellia ovalifoliata (Savithramma et al. 2011).
The toxic effects of silver on bacteria have been investigated for more than 60 years
(Franke et al. 2001). Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the inhibitory
effect of the AgNPs on bacteria. The exact mechanism behind the activity of nanosilver
on bacteria not yet fully elucidated, the three most common mechanisms of toxicity
proposed up to now are: uptake of free silver ions followed by disruption of ATP
production and DNA replication (Lok et al. 2006), formation of reactive oxygen species
(ROS) (Park et al. 2009) and direct damage to cell membranes (Raffi et al. 2008). It was
also suggested that silver ions released by AgNPs can interact with phosphorus moieties
in DNA, resulting in inactivation of DNA replication or can react with s-containing
proteins leading to the inhibition of enzymatic functions. AgNPs are highly reactive
79
because they generate Ag+ ions, whereas metallic silver is relatively unreactive (Morones
et al. 2005). Moreover, silver ions are known to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS)
that are detrimental to cells, causing damage to proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids (Hwang
et al. 2008). Ag+
may displace native metal cations from their usual binding sites in
enzymes (Ghandour et al.1988). Furthermore, silver ions inhibit oxidation of glucose,
glycerol, fumarate, and succinate in E. coli (Ahearn et al. 1995). This indicates that
AgNPs may target the bacterial membrane, leading to a dissipation of the proton motive
force (Lok et al. 2006). Consequently, the nanoparticles preferably attack the respiratory
chain, cell division finally leading to cell death (Rai et al. 2009). Holt and Bard 2005
found that Ag+ inhibited respiration of E. coli by determining change of oxygen dissolved
in culture resolution (Holt and Bard 2005). Besides, Kim et al. 2008 found that Ag+
interacted with thiol (–SH) group of cysteine by replacing the hydrogen atom to form
–S-Ag, thus hindering the enzymatic function of affected protein to inhibit growth of
E. coli.
According to Ashkarran et al. (2012) species sensitivity also depends on the structure
of the cell wall composition in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Several
additional factors influence the susceptibility or tolerance of bacteria to NPs. The
antibacterial effect of AgNPs found higher than CuNPs against E. coli (–) and S. aureus
(+) bacteria (Lu et al. 2009). The shape and size of nanoparticles have differential effect
on microorganisms. Tavares et al. (2009) speculated shape-dependent interaction of
AgNPs having different shapes with different effective surface areas in gram-negative
bacterium E. coli. Choi et al. (2008) observed that spherical and hexagonal AgNPs were
adsorbed onto the bacterial cell surface, causing cell surface depression. Shrivastava et al.
80
(2011) studied the dose dependent effect of silver nanoparticles (in the size range of 10-
15 nm) on the Gram-negative and Gram-positive microorganisms. Bard et al. (2005) have
reported micromolar levels of Ag+ ions to uncouple respiratory electron transport from
oxidative phosphorylation, inhibit respiratory chain enzymes, or interfere with the
membrane permeability to protons and phosphate. In addition, higher concentrations of
Ag+ ions have shown to interact with cytoplasmic components and nucleic acids (Dibrov
et al. 2002).
Sotiriou and Pratsinis (2010) proposed that the antibacterial activity of AgNPs depends
on size. They provided evidence that smaller size of AgNPs releases many Ag+ ions and
these ions dominate antibacterial activity. Patil et al. (2012) have investigated
antibacterial property of AgNPs against S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and E. coli. The plant
extract reduced AgNPs shows good fungicidal effect on A. flavus, A. niger and A.
fumigates (Singh et al. 2010). The fungistatic or fungicidal effect of AgNPs were due to
the inhibitory action of plant metabolite reduced silver and the mechanism involved was
cytoplasm granulation, cytoplasmic membrane rupture and inactivation or inhibition of
intracellular and extracellular enzymes. These biological events could take place
separately or culminating with mycelium germination inhibition (Cowan 1999).
The bactericidal activity of nanoparticles depends on the stability in the cultured medium
too. Nowadays the main problem is bacteria have developed resistance towards many
antibacterial agents. Hence there is increase in use of AgNPs in various fields against
microorganisms, so there is need to prepare the AgNPs with cost effective methods and
to find out the mechanism of antimicrobial activity. There are alarming reports of
opportunistic fungal infections. The infections caused by opportunistic fungi were
81
included under new spectrum of fungal pathogens. The results suggested that AgNPs
have exerted antifungal activity by disrupting the structure of cell membrane and
inhibiting the normal budding process due to the destruction of membrane integrity. The
present study indicates AgNPs have considerable antimicrobial activity.
Effect of Gold nanoparticles on seed germination
The impact of biologically synthesized AuNPs investigated on seed germination and
seedling growth in Pennisetum glaucum. AuNPs did not affect the seed living process but
have enhanced the seed germination and seedling growth compared to the control. Seed
germination enhancement have been speculated as dispersed nanoparticles can penetrate
through the seed coat and create “nano-holes” on seed coats, resulting in improved
germination conditions, slow and minimal release of Au ions could be one of the reason
for AuNPs to have no major effect on germination of Pennisetum glaucum seeds. The
highest percentage of seed germination was 86.66% and increased seedling length at
50µg/ml of gold nanoparticles followed by 20µg/ml. The seed germination and seedling
growth in this study was positively altered by nanoparticles. Thus, nano treated seeds can
be used to lower the environmental impacts of fungicides/pesticides and reduce the cost
of agricultural production. The nanoparticles after penetrating the seed coats, could
contact radicals directly. The root elongation of sensitive plant species would have a dose
dependent response. (Plate-25, Figure. 28 & 29) shows the effect of AuNPs on seed
germination, root length and shoot length of Pennisetum glaucum. Hence higher
concentration of AuNPs used in the study increased the germination percent with root,
shoot and total seedling length. This biological response of seed germination and
elongation could be highly dependent on both plant type and nanoparticle properties.
82
These results could be important for both areas of plant biology and nanotechnology. The
strategy of using biologically synthesized AuNPs to agricultural crop plants reduces the
cost of production and the environmental impact. The accumulated gold nanoparticles
move through the vasculature of the plant (Sabo et al. 2011). Compared to plant cell
walls and membranes the penetration of nanoparticles into seeds is expected to be
difficult due to thick seed coat (Srinivasan and Saraswathi 2010). The bioaccumulation,
biomagnification and biotransformation of engineered nanoparticles in food crops are still
not well understood (Rico et al. 2010). It has been suggested that metal transport proteins
may be involved in transporting gold across membranes (Bali et al. 2010) and Gardea-
Torresdey et al. (2002) have hypothesized that the NPs transport was active and the
translocation through the plant occurs through the water transport pathway (Sharma et al.
2007). The most logical hypothesized mechanism that metal transporters used for
essential metals are able to transport gold without having evolved to do so. The
nanoparticle effectively penetrates seed coat and influence the seed germination and plant
growth (Khodakovskaya et al. 2009). The reason could be that the NPs can penetrate
through seed coat and may be activate the embryo which leads to fastest germination. On
the contrary when nanoparticles were applied on leaf surfaces, entered through the
stomatal openings or through the bases of trichomes and then translocated to various
tissues (Uzu et al. 2010). Lin and Xing (2007) reported the positive effects of suspensions
of MWCNTs on seed germination and root growth of six different crop species radish
(Raphanus sativus), rape (Brassica napus), rye grass (Lolium perenne), lettuce (Lactuca
sativa), corn (Zea mays) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus). Nano-TiO2 (anatase) improved
plant growth by enhanced nitrogen metabolism (Yang et al. 2006) that promotes the
83
absorption of nitrate in spinach. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were found to penetrate
tomato seeds and affect their germination, growth rates and water uptake inside seeds
(Khodakovskaya et al. 2009). Our results are in agreement that the biological synthesized
AuNPs enhanced the germination and seedling growth of biofuel producing crop. The
AgNPs extended the vase life of gerbera flowers by inhibiting microbial growth and
reduced vascular blockage which results the increased water uptake and maintained the
turgidity (Liu et al.2009). The biological synthesized AgNPs enhanced the germination in
Pearl millet but reduced the growth of seedlings (Asra and Srinath 2014). With concerns
of toxicity, major attention has been driven to their uptake, translocation and
biotransformation in the plant systems. Although too much of anything is toxic,
observations have been made on the beneficial aspects of various nanomaterials and
enhanced water and nutrient uptake, gaseous exchange, and delivery of crucial chemicals
to the plants. Chilopsis linearis root growth was inhibited in the presence of gold above
0.8 mM (Rodriguez et al. 2007). Starnes et al. (2010) reported gold ions inhibited alfalfa
growth in liquid culture above 250µM and inhibited growth of Arabidopsis thaliana on
solid medium above 100µM gold. The toxicity of gold NPs in plants is concentration
dependent. From this it can be hypothesized that the least concentrations found worthy to
the plants whereas higher doses may affect the growth of the plants. Guadalupe de la
Rosa et al. (2009) investigated that up to 160mg/L, AuNPs did not reduce corn seed
germination or plant growth. The interaction of plant cell with the nanoparticles results in
modification of plant gene expression and associated biological pathways which
ultimately affect plant growth and development. The effect of NPs investigated in various
84
studies was dependent upon the type of plants used, nanoparticles size, shape and charge
also the particular environmental conditions.
Nano-encapsulated agrochemicals should be designed in such a way that they possess all
necessary properties such as effective concentration (with high solubility, stability and
effectiveness), time controlled release in response to certain stimuli, enhanced targeted
activity and less ecotoxicity with safe and easy mode of delivery thus avoiding repeated
application (Boehm et al. 2003). The study shows positive effect of green nanogold on
biofuel plant. Apart from the good growth in certain environmental conditions biofuel
crops get infected by various fungal, bacterial, viral diseases and nematodes, parasites.
The control of parasitic weeds with nanocapsulated herbicides could reduce the
phytotoxicity of herbicides on crops (Perea and Rubiales 2009). Surface modified
hydrophobic nanosilica has been successfully used to control a range of agricultural
insect pests (Barik et al. 2008). The use of such nanobiopesticide will be more acceptable
since they could be safe for plants and cause less environmental pollution in comparison
to conventional chemical pesticides. Hence nanoparticulate formulations can be used as
novel agrochemicals with high specificity and improved functions.
Effect of Silver nanoparticles on seed germination
The biosynthesized AgNPs were used to study its influence on seed germination, shoot
length, root length in Pennisetum glaucum. Silver nanoparticles did not adversely affect
the seed living process. Infact AgNPs have enhanced the seed germination compared to
the control. As mentioned above seed germination enhancement could be due to
dispersed nanoparticles can penetrate through the seed coat and create “nano-holes” on
seed coats, resulting in improved germination conditions, slow and minimal release of
85
Ag+ ions could be one of the reasons for AgNPs to have no major effect on germination
of Pennisetum glaucum seeds. The highest percentage of seed germination was 93.33% at
50mg/L of silver nanoparticles. Since results revealed treating seeds with silver
nanoparticles did not reduce germination, so possible to use this treatment in agricultural
practices. This may explain that seed germination in this study was not greatly altered by
nanoparticles. Silver nanoparticles can protect seeds against fungi as well as the
conventional fungicide. Results of seed protection test indicate that silver nanoparticles
may be an alternative to conventional fungicides for protecting seeds against fungi. Thus,
nano treated seeds can be used to lower the environmental impacts of fungicides and
reduce the cost of agricultural production. The silver nanoparticles at 50µg/ml decreased
the root length and shoot length followed by 20µg/ml. Nanoparticles adhere to plant roots
and exert physical or chemical toxicity in plants. Radicals, after penetrating the seed
coats, could contact the nanoparticles directly. The root elongation of sensitive plant
species would have a dose-dependent response. Sresty and Rao (1999) predicted that
roots are the first target tissue to confront with excess concentrations of pollutants. Toxic
symptoms seem to appear more in roots rather than in shoots. The nanoparticles
presumably cross the epidermis and the root cortex by the apoplastic route and then
endodermis via protoplasts, to reach the central part of the roots and transported to
shoots. The impact of AgNPs can be evaluated in three levels; physiological
phytotoxicity, cellular accumulation and subcellular transport of AgNPs. AgNPs
accumulated progressively in the sequence: border cells, root cap, columella and
columella initials. AgNPs were apoplastically transported in the cell wall and found
aggregated at plasmodesmata (Jane et al. 2013). Breakage of cell wall and vacuoles in
86
root cells of test species described the toxicity of particles as the pore size of the cell
walls smaller than the nanoparticles which can be taken up and translocated through
stems to leaves. Hence AgNPs could penetrate the plant system and may interfere with
intracellular components, causing damage to cell division. It was investigated that AgNPs
impaired the stages of cell division and caused cell disintegration (Kumari et al. 2009).
The effect of silver nanoparticles on seed germination, root length and shoot length of
Pennisetum glaucum is given in (Plate-26, Figure.30 & 31). Higher the concentration of
AgNPs decreased the root, shoot and total seedling length. It was observed that higher
concentration of nanoparticles had adverse effect on plant species. Inhibition of seed
germination and root elongation found to be highly dependent on both plant type and
nanoparticle properties.
Nanotoxicology is the study of the toxicity of nanomaterials. Because of the size effects
and large surface area, nanomaterials have unique properties compared with their larger
counterparts (Cristina et al. 2007). Seed germination and root elongation is a rapid and
widely used acute phytotoxicity test with several advantages: sensitivity, simplicity, low
cost and suitability for unstable chemicals or samples (Munzuroglu and Geckil 2002).
However mechanism of nanotoxicity remains unknown it would depend on the chemical
composition, chemical structure, particle size and surface area of the nanoparticles.
Toxicity of nanoparticles may be attributed to two different actions (1) a chemical
toxicity based on the chemical composition e.g. release of toxic ions and (2) stress or
stimuli caused by the surface, size and shape of the particles (Brunner et al. 2006).
Smaller NPs would have higher surface energy and thus proved more toxic to the cell
(Krug and Wick 2011). In terms of metallic nanoparticles (MNPs), copper nanoparticles
87
have shown to be toxic on two crop species, mung bean (Phaseolus radiatus) and wheat
(Triticum aestivum) as demonstrated by the reduced seedling growth rate (Lee et al.
2008). Kumari et al. (2009) studied AgNPs could disrupt cell division process causing
chromatin Bridge, stickiness and cell disintegration in Allium cepa. Another study on root
cells of Allium cepa reported that ZnO NPs exert cytotoxic and genotoxic effects,
including lipid peroxidation, decreasing of the mitotic index and increasing the
micronuclei and chromosomal aberration indexes (Kumari et al. 2011). According to
Raskar and Laware (2014) the lower concentration of ZnO NPs was not harmful to the
cell division and early seedlings growth in onion. Up to this point, most evidence on
phytotoxicity appeared to support the hypothesis that surface area as most important
factor on the phytotoxicity of nanoparticles to plants at both seedling and cellular levels.
Seed germination in zucchini was unaffected by bulk or nano Ag, Cu, Si, MWCNTs or
ZnO even at 1000 mg/L (Stampoulis et al. 2009). The silver nanosolution coated seeds
recorded better germination than the seeds treated with fungicide and concluded to use
silver nano coating instead of using fungicides (Karimi et al. 2012). Silver NPs even at
the highest dose employed (4000 ppm) did not disturb the germination of the seedlings or
the growth of Ricinus communis (Jyothsna and Pathipati 2013). Yang and Watts (2005)
reported Nano-TiO2 promoted photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism and improved
growth of spinach. TiO2 NPs via the electrospray promoted the germination of lettuce
(Lactuca sativa) seeds (Stephen et al. 2014) and wheat (Mahmoodzadeh and Aghili
2014). Similarly nano SiO2 significantly enhanced the seed germination in tomato
(Siddiqui and Al-Whaibi 2014). The multiwall carbon nanotubes penetrated tomato seeds
and increased the germination rate up to 90% (compared to 71% in control) by rising
88
water uptake, also increased plant biomass (Khodakovskaya et al. 2009). Our results are
in agreement that biologically synthesized silver NPs enhanced the percentage of seed
germination in Pennisetum glaucum. Majumdar and Ahmed (2011) reported significant
inhibition in rate of seed germination, root and shoot growth by silver nanoparticles when
compared with silver ions in Oryza sativa, Brassica campestris and Vigna radiata. The
silver ions inhibited barley seed germination (El-Temsah and Joner 2012). Reports on
various size of AgNPs showed that Ag colloid (0.6±2nm) had greater toxicity in flax,
barley and rye grass than AgNPs of 5 and 20nm (Locke et al. 2000). Engineered
nanoparticles adhere to plant roots and exert physical or chemical toxicity in plants.
Lin et al. (2009) reported the root growth inhibition by using different nanoparticles on
different plant species. AgNPs also inhibited the growth of Lemna minor (Gubbins et al.
2011). AgNPs significantly decreased plant biomass, plant tissue nitrate-nitrogen content,
chlorophyll a/b and chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm) in an aquatic macrophyte Spirodela
polyrhiza (Jiang et al. 2012). Nanoparticles phytotoxicity on various edible plants and the
potential impact of NPs on agricultural processes was examined (Mondal et al. 2011,
Rico et al. 2011). TiO2 NPs were efficiently taken up by plant roots and localized in the
parenchymal region and vascular cylinder in Triticum aestivum, Brassica napus and
Arabidopsis thaliana (Larue et al. 2011). AgNPs caused changes in proteins involved in
the redox regulation and in the sulfur metabolism. AgNPs altered some proteins related to
the endoplasmic reticulum and vacuole (Vannini et al. 2013). The nanoparticles may also
bind with different cytoplasmic organelles and interfere with the metabolic processes at
that site (Jia et al. 2005). Yin et al. (2011) has been suggested that phytotoxicity depends
on plant selection, concentrations tested, size, and exposure conditions. Silver
89
nanoparticles during penetrations inside the root cell, damaged the cell wall as well as
vacuoles to enter and concluded that it may be due to the penetration of larger particles
entering through small pores of cell walls. Ruffini and Cremonini (2009) reported AgNPs
mostly affected the shoot and root growth than seed germination. A comparative study of
nano TiO2 and AgNPs on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) mature plants, AgNPs
exhibited low chlorophyll contents, higher SOD, and less fruit production, but nano-TiO2
treated plants showed only higher SOD values at the highest (5000 mg/kg) levels of
treatment (Uhram et al. 2013). However Krishnaraj et al. (2012) reported AgNPs treated
plant (Bacopa monnieri) had higher levels of protein and carbohydrate while
comparatively lower level of total phenol content (TPC), CAT and POX activities,
reflecting the better plant growth with reduced toxicity. Nanoparticles may increase
lipid membrane peroxidation upon contact to cells due to the reactive oxygen species
(ROS) (Nel et al. 2006). The entry of nanosilver into the cell has damage DNA (ATSDR
1990). Copper oxide NPs damaged DNA in some agricultural and grassland plants
(Raphanus sativus, Lolium perenne, and Lolium rigidum) (Atha et al. 2012). MWCNTs
induced increased oxidative stress and decreased cell proliferation, which eventually led
to complete cell death in Rice (Tan et al. 2009). While examining the acute toxic effects
of AgNPs in different organisms, Liu and Hurt (2010) suggested that the toxic effects of
silver nanoparticles was due to the presence of nanoparticles and secondly by the release
of Ag+ ions from nanoparticles and the free radicals generated during the AgNPs
suspension.
90
Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Biosynthesized Gold and Silver Nanoparticles on
Human Cancer Cell Lines
The study describes dose dependent cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of biologically
synthesized AuNPs and AgNPs on A549, LNCap-FGC, MDA-MB. The half maximal
inhibitory concentration (IC50) was calculated as the concentration required for
inhibiting the growth of cancer cells in culture by 50 % compared to the untreated cells.
The effect of synthesized AuNPs and AgNPs on human carcinoma cell lines was
investigated by knowing IC50 values using MTT assay (Plate-27, Figure.32). The IC50
of AuNPs obtained at 10µg/ml on all the cancer cell lines and increased concentration of
AuNPs 30µg/ml resulted in 100 % cell lysis. The IC50 for AgNPs could be less than
10µg/ml, because at this concentration AgNPs has resulted in 100 % cell lysis of cancer
cell lines (Plate-28, Figure.33). Longer exposures could result in additional toxicity to the
cells. These results demonstrate that AuNPs and AgNPs facilitated concentration
dependent increase in toxicity. However, the actions of AuNPs and AgNPs depend on
size, shape, conditions of media, type of cells, dose and exposure time. Since most Nano
toxicological screening studies found simpler to perform in in vitro on cell cultures,
though these results may not accurately predict the in vivo toxicity. Griffith and Swartz
(2006) provided a basis for understanding the mechanism of toxicity and nanoparticle
uptake at the cellular level. Goodman et al. (2004) proved AuNPs as biologically inert
and non-toxic. The cytotoxicity induced by gold nanoparticles depends on size, shape,
functional group, charge as well as on the method of cellular uptake (Chen et al. 2009). It
was found that 1.4nm gold nanospheres triggered necrosis, mitochondrial damage and
oxidative stress on all examined cell lines, and found no evidence of cellular damage for
91
15nm gold nanospheres bearing the same surface group (Pan et al. 2009). The result
highlights the possible size dependent toxicity of gold nanoparticles, while many studies
focused on determining the lethal dosage of nanoparticles (LD50, dose required to kill
half of the population). In addition, the potential cytotoxicity of AgNPs against cancer
was demonstrated (Sriram et al. 2010). Franco-Molina et al. (2010) reported the
cytotoxic effect of colloidal silver on MCF7 human breast cancer cells through induction
of apoptosis. AgNPs disrupts normal cellular function, affects the membrane integrity
and induces various apoptotic signaling genes of mammalian cells leading to
programmed cell death (Sanpui et al. 2011). Gopinath et al. (2008) observed the IC50
value and molecular mechanism of 10-15nm size of AgNPs mediated cytotoxicity in
BHK21 (noncancer) and HT29 (cancer) cells at 27µg/ml, whereas in our study IC50
value was lesser than the concentration reported. The present IC50 results revealed that
Cassia auriculata mediated synthesized AgNPs shows more efficacy than the previously
report. In a study on the effects of AgNPs on skin using the human derived keratinocyte
HaCaT cell line model, AgNPs caused concentration and time dependent decrease of cell
viability, with IC50 values of 6.8±1.lM (MTT assay) and 12±1.2lM (SRB assay) after 7
days of contact (Zanette et al. 2011). However in our experiment the incubation time of
cell with nanoparticles was only 4hrs which has revealed 100 % cell lysis in short period
of time and made these nanoparticles more efficient. Using an MTT assay, comparison of
effective concentration (EC50) values of AgNPs of different sizes (5nm, 20nm and 50
nm) and surface areas on different cell types (A549, HepG2, MCF-7 and SGC-7901
cells) were also evaluated (Liu et al. 2010). The silver nanoparticles on Human
epidermoid larynx carcinoma cell line exhibited a dose dependent toxicity and the
92
viability of Hep-2 cells was decreased to 50% (IC50) at the concentration of 500nM
(Kaliyamurthi et al. 2012). In the present study silver nanoparticles were found to be
more toxic than gold nanoparticles as reported earlier (Foldbjerg et al. 2011). The
flavonoid conjugated AgNPs were devoid of anticancer effect and found synergic effect
of AuNPs on cell lines (Raghunandan et al. 2011), lower cytotoxicity of AgNPs
compared to AuNPs may attributed to the difference in surface charges between NPs
(Yen et al. 2009). The cytotoxic effects of silver nanoparticles were due to active
physicochemical interaction of silver atoms with the functional groups of intracellular
proteins as well as with the nitrogen bases and phosphate groups in DNA (Moaddab et al.
2011).
DNA Fragmentation
The impact of AuNPs and AgNPs in DNA fragmentation was investigated. The assay
involves extraction of DNA from a lysed cell homogenate followed by agarose gel
electrophoresis. The gel after electrophoresis clearly revealed the intensity of all treated
DNA samples has diminished, possibly because of the cleavage of the DNA (Plate-29,
Figure.34). The metals produced ROS such as hydroxyl radical (OH), superoxide radical
(O2-
) or hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) which cleaves the DNA. These nanoparticles produce
oxidative stress which causes direct damage to the DNA in which a single electron may
be accepted or donated by the metal. Excessive production of ROS in the cell known to
induce apoptosis (Martindale and Holbrook 2002) and plays an important role in
apoptosis induced by AgNPs (Carlson et al. 2008). AgNPs were also reported to induce
severe structural damage and accumulate in mitochondria, which eventually contributed
to oxidative stress (Asharani et al. 2009b). Generation of excessive intracellular ROS
93
leads to apoptosis and necrosis (Hackenberg et al. 2011) because increased ROS levels
correlate with massive DNA breakage and high levels of apoptosis and necrosis (Singh
and Ramarao 2012). However a number of mechanisms affect the ability of nanoparticles
to cause DNA damage. ROS may cause DNA–protein crosslinks, damage to the
deoxyribose phosphate backbone, and specific chemical modifications of purine and
pyrimidine bases (Dizdaroglu 1991). ROS can also modify the DNA bases and cause
strand scission by degrading the ribose ring (Yang and Gao 2002). The DNA damage by
gold nanoparticles further supports the fact that gold nanoparticles induced apoptosis in
HL-60 cells (RaviGeetha et al. 2013). Highly reactive ROS caused oxidative harm to
DNA and cell enzymes (Boonstra and Post 2004). Panda et al. (2011) suggested that
AgNPs induced DNA damage was apparently mediated through ROS. Cadet et al. (2010)
reported that H2O2 being highly reactive with Ag, yielded OH radicals which in turn
damaged DNA.
Antibacterial Activity of Au-BNC and Ag-BNC Bio-nanocomposites
The Au-BNC and Ag-BNC nanocomposites evaluated to determine the antibacterial
activity. The bionanocomposites were found antibacterial against E. coli (Gram negative)
and B. subtilis (Gram positive) strains as indicated by zones of inhibition around the films
in bacterial culture plates and there was no zone of inhibition found around the control
alginate film indicating no antibacterial activity of alginate (Plate-30, Figure.35 & 36).
The nanoparticles embedded throughout the networks releases ions within aqueous media
and interact with the bacteria. It has been reported that when metallic silver reacts with
moisture or human fluids, releases silver ions, damaging bacteria or inhibiting bacterial
replication (Blaker et al. 2004). Ag-BNC was found better than Au-BNC in antibacterial
94
activity which confirms that AgNPs have strong effects on microbes as reported in the
literature. Clinical guidelines recommended the use of silver dressings for wounds
healing by preventing microorganisms (Best Practice Statement 2011) and have
beneficial effects on cost of wound management and on quality of life parameters
(Opasanon et al. 2010). From the results, the bionanocomposite hydrogels showed better
activity towards the gram-negative bacteria than gram-positive bacteria, due to the
presence of high lipid content in the gram negative bacterial cell wall (Madhusudana et
al. 2013). The possible mode of increased toxicity of bionanocomposite may be due to
nanoparticles releases ions easily and interact with lipid layer of cell membrane (Murali
Mohan et al. 2007) thus extending their application for antibacterial purposes. The
composites of silver nanoparticles within polymers results in the improvement of
antimicrobial activities at lower concentrations (Madhusudana et al. 2013).