restitution contracts – prof. merges jan. 31, 2011

61
Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Upload: ally-beste

Post on 15-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Restitution

Contracts – Prof. Merges

Jan. 31, 2011

Page 2: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011
Page 3: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011
Page 4: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Restitution

Page 5: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011
Page 6: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011
Page 7: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011
Page 8: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011
Page 9: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011
Page 10: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011
Page 11: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Cotnam v. Wisdom

• Procedural history?

Page 12: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Cotnam v. Wisdom

• Procedural history?

• Plaintiff wins below (jury trial)

• Judgment below reversed and remanded

Page 13: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Cotnam v. Wisdom

• What is an “intestate”?

Page 14: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Cotnam v. Wisdom

• What is the holding in this case?

Page 15: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Cotnam v. Wisdom

• What is the holding in this case?

• Plaintiff/Doctor is owed reasonable compensation for services rendered; remanded for retrial on issue of proper amount of damages

Page 16: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

• Why no contract?

Page 17: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Jury instruction # 2

• What was it?

Page 18: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Jury instruction # 2

• What was it?

• “Character and importance of operation and decedent’s ability to pay are elements to be considered in determining what is a reasonable charge . . .”

Page 19: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Jury instruction # 2

• What was wrong with it?

Page 20: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Sceva v. True - guidance

• What categories of contracts are discussed in the Sceva case?

Page 21: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Sceva v. True - guidance

• What categories of contracts are discussed in the Sceva case?

“necessaries furnished to [a legally incompetent person] may be liable in assumpsit . . .”

P. 107

Page 22: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Varieties of K’s

• Explicit oral or written K

• “Implied in fact” K

Page 23: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Varieties of K’s

• Explicit oral or written K

• “Implied in fact” K

• “Quasi-contract” or Implied in Law Contract

Page 24: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Implied in law Ks

• Why a “legal fiction”?

Page 25: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011
Page 26: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011
Page 27: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Jury instruction # 2

• What was wrong with it?

• Bottom 108: relevant only if there is a contract . . .

Page 28: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

What is the proper measure of recovery?

• A “reasonable compensation for the services rendered . . .”

Page 29: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Why the emphasis on Dr/patient cases?

• What is unique?

• Professionals expect compensation

• Compare Mills v. Wyman

Page 30: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Restitution

Rest. 1st of Restitution § 112 comment a – the case of the hopeful home improver

Page 31: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Restatement 3d Restitution – Tentative Draft 2010

§1 (3) There is no liability in restitution for an unrequested benefit voluntarily conferred, unless the circumstances of the transaction justify the claimant's intervention in the absence of contract.

Page 32: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Indiana Lumbermens Mut. Ins. Co. v. Reinsurance Results, Inc., 513 F.3d 652 (7th Cir. 2008) (Posner, J.)

If while you are sitting on your porch sipping Margaritas a trio of itinerant musicians serenades you with mandolin, lute, and hautboy, you have no obligation, in the absence of a contract, to pay them for their performance no matter how much you enjoyed it . . . .

Page 33: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Contract is incomparably superior to restitution as a means of regulating most voluntary transfers because it eliminates, or minimizes, the fundamental difficulty of valuation…. The consequence for the law of restitution is that restitution is not normally available to the claimant who should have made a contract with the recipient but failed to do so.

-- Rest. Restitution, TD, § 1, comment f

Page 34: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

§ 371. Measure Of Restitution Interest

• If a sum of money is awarded to protect a party's restitution interest, it may as justice requires be measured by either

• (a) the reasonable value to the other party of what he received in terms of what it would have cost him to obtain it from a person in the claimant's position, or

• (b) the extent to which the other party's property has been increased in value or his other interests advanced.

Page 35: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Restatement (Third) of Restitution And Unjust Enrichment (Tentative

Draft)2005

§ 1. Restitution And Unjust Enrichment

A person who is unjustly enriched at the expense of another is liable in restitution to the other.

Page 36: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

§ 1 Illustration 4. Acting in an emergency and with no opportunity to contract, A provides medical services to B. A does not intend to act gratuitously and plans to seek compensation later. The circumstances of the transaction make it one in which the law permits A to assert that he did not intend to make B a gift of services.

Page 37: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

R3d Restit. TD § 20. Protection Of Another's Life Or Health

A person who performs, supplies, or obtains professional services reasonably necessary for the protection of another's life or health has a claim in restitution against the other if the circumstances justify the claimant's decision to intervene without a prior agreement for payment or reimbursement. Restitution under this Section is measured by a reasonable charge for the services provided.

Page 38: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Schott v. Westinghouse

Page 39: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Collana v. Oak Park Homes

Page 40: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011
Page 41: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011
Page 42: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

What was the K in Collano?

Page 43: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

What was the K in Collano?

• Between Callano and Bruce Pendergast

Page 44: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

How did Oak Park Homes enter the scene?

Page 45: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

How did Oak Park Homes enter the scene?

• Why no contract action between Callano and Oak Park Homes?

Page 46: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Callanos Bruce Pender-gast

$$

Promise to install shrubs

Page 47: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Why not sue Pendergast/Grantges?

Page 48: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Callanos Bruce Pender-gast

$$

Promise to install shrubs

Page 49: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Callanos

Oakwood Park Homes

Page 50: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Callanos

Oakwood Park Homes

“Privity of Contract”

Page 51: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Callanos

Oakwood Park Homes

No “Privity of Contract”

Page 52: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Callano on “quasi-contracts”

• Clothed with the semblance of contract for the purpose of the remedy

• “The duty defines the contract”

Page 53: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Compare Paschall’s, note 2, 112

Page 54: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Compare Paschall’s, note 2, 110

• “Exhaustion of remedies” against contracting party -- ?

Page 55: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Mechanics’ liens - 113

Page 56: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Pyeatte v. Pyeatte

• History

• Facts

Page 57: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Why a restitution claim?

• Contract “indefiniteness”

• Still relevant?

Page 58: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

What can be claimed?

• Compare Wisner

Page 59: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

What can be claimed?

• Amount of claim in Pyeatte?

• Time limits on claim?

Cal Fam Code § 2641 (10 years or more, no separate recovery)

Page 60: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Dementas v. Tallas

• Good case to suggest need for reform?

• Is the result unfair?

Page 61: Restitution Contracts – Prof. Merges Jan. 31, 2011

Wendy Gordon, On Owning Information: Intellectual Property and the Restitutionary

Impulse, 78 Virginia Law Review 149-281 (1992)